CITY COUNCIL 2-7-00THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST
COUNCIL AGENDA
February 7, 2000
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Honorable Howard J Kerr, Mayor
Samuel J. Henry, Alderman First Ward Henry T. Chandler, Alderman Third Ward
Robert T. E. Lansing, Alderman First Ward Lawrence Temple, Alderman Third Ward
Ashley M. Maentz, Alderman Second Ward Mary Ann Pekarek, Alderman Fourth Ward
Peter M. Mott, Alderman Second ward G. Bishop Gallagher, Alderman Fourth Ward
REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS
1. Comments by Mayor
A. Appointment to the Plan Commission
2. Comments by City Manager
3. Comments by Council Members
A. Finance Committee Report
Consideration of a Recommendation from the Finance Committee Regarding a Motion to Approve Changes in certain Fees and Charges for Fiscal Year 2001 (Final Approval)
PRESENTED BY FINANCE COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN JERRY HENRY
The approval of a motion is required to implement the increases in various fees and charges that were recommended in the “Annual User Charge Analysis”, which were reviewed by the Finance
Committee on November 18, 1999 and earlier this evening at the Finance Committee meeting.
Included in this detailed analysis, which is conducted annually on the several hundred user fees and charges utilized in the City, was a review of all fees and charges, permits, licenses,
and fines and penalties. The annual review of these charges ensures that the fee charged is consistent with the actual costs incurred for delivering these services.
The Finance Committee conducted a review of the “Annual User Charge Analysis” at its Budget meeting of November 18 and earlier this evening and recommends that the following increases
be approved and are effective for the fiscal year beginning on May 1, 2000.
Only those fees recommended for increase are noted below. A complete review of all fees charged by the City can be found in the “Annual User Charge Analysis” report, which was previously
distributed in the Finance Committee packet. The proposed increases are summarized below:
Fees and Charges:
Current Proposed
1. Water Rates/100 Cubic Feet FY2000 FY2001
a. Resident User $2.20 $2.30
2. Sewer Charge/100 Cubic Feet $0.20 $0.25
3. Water Main and Meter Fees
a. 1” Main Tap $360 $370
b. 1½” Main Tap $720 $740
c. 2” Main Tap $925 $950
d. 2” + Main Tap $620 $640
e. ¾” Meter $285 $295
f. 1” Meter $340 $350
g. 1½” Meter $650 $675
h. 2” Meter $850 $875
4. Golf Course Fees/Charges
Seasonal Fees – Resident:
1. Adult Single $730 $750
2. Adult Combo $1,360 $1,400 3. Limited $525 $540
4. Senior Citizen $425 $435
5. Senior Citizen Combo $800 $820
6. Junior $295 $325
b. Seasonal Fees – Non-Residents:
1. Adult Single $1,000 $1,040
2. Adult Combo $1,900 $1,980
3. Limited $625 $660
4. Junior $295 $325
c. Daily Fees – Residents:
1. Weekday – 9 Holes $16 $17
2. Weekday – 18 Holes $25 $26
3. Senior Citizen – 9 or 18 Holes $20 $20
4. Saturday, Sunday, Holiday – Twilight $19 $20
5. Saturday, Sunday, Holiday – 18 Holes $30 $31
d. Electric Golf Carts:
1. 9 Holes $17 $18
2. 18 Holes $25 $26
e. Daily Fees – Non-Resident:
1. Weekday – 9 Holes $19 $20
2. Weekday – 18 Holes $29 $30
3. Senior Citizen – 9 or 18 Holes $22 $23
4. Saturday, Sunday, Holiday – Twilight $20 $22
5. Saturday, Sunday, Holiday – 18 Holes $34 $35
f. Seasonal Start Times: $220 $225
5. General Fees and Charges
a. Park Contributions $3,700/Lot $3,900/Lot
b. Open Space Contributions $3,700/Lot $3,900/Lot
6. Boat Ramp/Beach Permits
a. Power Boat Ramp (Senior) $195 $200
b. Power Boat Ramp (R) $260 $270
c. Sailboat Launch and Storage (W/S)(R) $1,175 $1,200
d. Sailboat Launch and Storage (W/S)(R Sen.) $560 $575
e. Sailboat Launch and Storage (R) $800 $810
f. Sailboat Launch and Storage (Senior) $410 $425
g. Fishing Parking (R) $75 $80
h. Fishing Parking (Senior) $55 $60
i. Sailboat Beach Launch and Storage (R) $250 $260
j. Sailboat Beach Launch and Storage (Sen.) $185 $200
7. Parking Permits
a. Resident – Full Year $200 $210
b. Resident – Half Year $100 $105
c. Resident – 4 Month Hang Tag $70 $75
d. Resident – Remote $80 $90
Current Proposed
Parking Permits – Continued FY2000 FY2001
e. Resident – 4 Month Remote HT $30 $35
f. Resident – Unlimited $550 $575
g. Non-Resident – Full Year $420 $440
h. Non-Resident – Half Year $210 $220
i. Non-Resident – Quarterly Hang Tag $110 $115
8. Historic Preservation Committee Fees (NEW)
a. Demolition & Replace – Complete N/A $500
b. Demolition & Replace – Partial N/A $300
c. New Structure N/A $300
d. Addition & Alternations N/A $250
9. Fire Prevention Fees (NEW)
a. Alarm System Review N/A 1% of Sq. Ft.
b. Sprinkler System Review N/A 1% of Sq. Ft.
c. Specialized Systems Review N/A $50 each
d. Fire Inspection Fee (1-3 Free) N/A $50 each (After 3rd)
Recommended Action: Final Approval of the proposed increases in fees and charges for FY2001. (Staff Contact: Robert Shaffer 615-4222)
B. Status Report on the Elawa Farm Executive Steering Committee
PRESENTED BY ALDERMAN ASHLEY MAENTZ AND CHRISTINE SHAW, CO-CHAIRMAN
In August 1998, as part of the proposed Middlefork Farms Subdivision, the City purchased 16 acres on the west side of Waukegan Road of what was then called the LeWa property. The City’s
primary interest in securing the property was for a future elementary school site and neighborhood park for the northwest quadrant of the City. The purchase was made in conjunction
with Lake Forest Open Lands and the Lake County Forest Preserve District. Through a series of visioning sessions with over 75 participants representing approximately 20 community, civic
and governmental organizations, a concept plan for the redevelopment of Elawa Farm was developed.
In August 1999, Mayor Kerr appointed the Elawa Farm Executive Steering Committee to develop a coordinated business plan for the development and use and the historic Elawa Farm property
and buildings. The committee has subsequently met over the past five months, and Committee Co-Chairmen Ashley Maentz and Christine Shaw will provide a status report on the committee’s
discussions to date.
OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
CONSENT AGENDA
1. Approval of the Minutes from the January 20, 2000 City Council Meeting
A copy of the minutes are attached beginning on page 12.
2. Approval of a Resolution in Support of Legislation to Fund Truck Weigh Station Staffing
Illinois Route 41 is a major roadway used continuously by trucks traveling to destinations in and beyond Lake Forest. The infrequent and irregular hours of operation of the truck weigh
station serving northern Lake County presents a serious safety situation on Route 41 as the increasing truck traffic is not sufficiently monitored for safety problems and other violations.
To address this situation, State Representative Susan Garrett recently introduced legislation that would fund regular and consistent truck weigh station staffing in the State of Illinois,
allowing for increased truck safety monitoring.
A copy of resolution supporting this legislation is attached as page 15. If approved, the resolution would be sent to neighboring communities recommending their support of this action.
3. Consideration of a Resolution Appropriating Funds for the 2000 Street Resurfacing Program
Engineering for the 2000 Street Resurfacing Program is complete. The City plans to resurface approximately 6.5 miles of streets this year during the summer months. The following is
a list of the streets included in the 2000 Program:
Bank Lane – Illinois Road to Deerpath Wedgewood Court
Illinois Road – Band Lane to Western Devonshire Lane
Evergreen Drive Devonshire Court
Jennifer Court Polo Drive
Kathryn lane Praire Avenue (North and South)
Kurtis Lane Telegraph Road – Everett Road to Everett
Old Mill Road – Rt. 43 to dead end east School Road
Oak Knoll Drive – Old Mill to where concrete begins Fairway Drive
Lawrence Avenue Kennett Lane
Oak Knoll Drive – Bowling Green Drive to Arcady Drive Wood Hill Lane
Wedgewood Drive Lawrence Avenue
Stonleigh Court Cascade Court North
Parliament Court Cascade Court South
Wimbledon Court Estate Lane East
Stratford Court Wild Rose Lane
Grove Court White Oak Road
Heritage Court
The entire project is to be funded through motor Fuel Tax (MFT) Funds. In order to stay on schedule (accept bids March 21 and award bid on April 3), it is necessary at this time to
appropriate by Resolution the proposed MFT expenditure of $950,000.00 A copy of the Resolution for Maintenance of Streets and Highways by Municipality under the Illinois Highway Code
is attached beginning on page 16. A map indicating streets that will be affected is attached beginning on page 17.
Recommended Action: Approval of the Consent Agenda items as presented
ORDINANCES
1. Consideration of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 47, “Misdemeanors”, of the City Code Regarding School Curfew for Minors (Second Reading and Final Approval)
PRESENTED BY FOURTH WARD ALDERMAN MARY ANN PEKAREK
In February of last year, the process of reviewing the City’s parental responsibility ordinances was undertaken with several community meetings, input and suggestions from the School
districts, C.R.O.Y.A., and LEAD. On November 18, 1999, the City Council passed the parental responsibility ordinance.
As part of this process, the School Curfew ordinance was suggested for consideration: 1) to align our ordinance with the Village of Lake Bluff, and 2) to give the Police the authority
needed, when asked, to pick up a child who was not in school. While the parental responsibility ordinance passed, the language of the School Curfew ordinance continued to be reviewed.
After much more discussion and language revisions, a final draft is presented for your consideration. Input from School District 115, School District 67, and the Police Department
was again received. We also conferred with Judge Victoria Rosetti of the Lake County Juvenile Court to be sure the language is appropriate. The changes to the ordinance since last
considered by the City Council are in italics.
This ordinance makes it unlawful for minors to be away from school when it is in session and gives our Police the authority to enforce a school curfew. A copy of the proposed ordinance
is attached beginning on page 18. First reading of the ordinance was granted at the November 18, 1999 City Council Meeting.
Recommended Action: Grant second reading and final approval of an ordinance amending Chapter 47 of the City Code adding a new Section, “School Curfew for Minors.”
2. Consideration of a Recommended Amendment to the City’s Fire Prevention Code to Allow for the Charging of Plan review fees, Sprinkler and Alarm System Permitting and Excessive Multiple
Re-inspections Fees. (First Reading)
PRESENTED BY FIRE CHIEF MIKE BEATTY (847) 615-4240 AND
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU CAPTAIN MIKE FRAKE (847) 615-4238
The Fire Department Fire Prevention Bureau conducts plan reviews on all commercial remodeling and new construction in the City. The reviews look for building plan compliance with City,
State and National Fire and Building codes. Should discrepancies exist in the plans, notes are written on the plans and they are sent back to the owner for correction, re-submittal
and re-review. Once plans are approved, installation inspections and final acceptance tests are conducted. All of this would be covered by the plan review and permitting fee. Currently,
the fire department does not charge for this service. In calendar 1999 the Bureau conducted 199 plan reviews. In 1997 and 1998 the bureau conducted 143 and 175 plan reviews respectively.
The Fire Prevention Bureau also conducts safety and fire inspections on all commercial and public buildings every year. These inspections involve an initial inspection and any number
of re-inspections on all commercial and public buildings every year. These inspections involve an initial inspection and any number of re-inspections to gain compliance. 75% of the
building owners comply within three inspections to bring their buildings up to code. These three inspections cover about three months. every effort is made to work with the building
owner to assure compliance. If the violation will cost the owner significant money, then a time table is worked out with the owner for compliance and that violation is put on hold while
the agreed upon plan is worked through. Should the owner not submit a compliance plan for long term violations, then the re-inspection process will run about five months and could end
in a “red tag” being placed on the building exits.
A red tag is a bright red notice that is applied to all of the building’s exits and states that the building is in violation of City safety codes. Typically, the violations are corrected
quickly once the tags are applied. In calendar 1999 the Bureau performed 823 initial inspections, 514 re-inspections of which 119 were fourth or higher re-inspection. In an effort
to encourage timely correction of violations, reduce inspector’s office and field follow-ups and possibly eliminate the red tag stage, the Fire Department would like to charge a fee
for excessive multiple re-inspections.
To be able to charge a fee for plan reviews and re-inspections, the Fire Prevention Code must be amended. Attached beginning on page 20 is the proposed Fire Prevention Code ordinance
amendment as written by the City Attorney. The requested fee schedule is presented in another agenda item.
Recommended Action: Approval of the First Reading of an ordinance amending the Fire Prevention Code to allow the Fire Department to charge a fee for Plan Reviews, Sprinkler and Alarm
System Permitting and Excessive Multiple Re-Inspections.
3. Consideration of a Report and Recommendation from the Zoning Board of Appeals for a Special Use Permit to Recognize an Existing Use and to Allow for the Expansion and Renovation of
Nollen Residence Hall located on the Lake Forest College Campus, west of Sheridan Road and south of Rosemary Road. (Lake Forest College Variation) (First Reading and Final Approval)
PRESENTED BY SENIOR PLANNER CATHERINE CZERNIAK (615-4299)
On January 24, 2000, the Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing to consider a request for a Special Use Permit to recognize the existing use on the site and to allow for the expansion
and renovation of Nollen Residence Hall located on the Lake Forest College campus. This project is a continuation of the College’s efforts to upgrade the residence halls throughout
the campus to allow the College to effectively compete with other liberal arts colleges for students. The existing residence halls do not meet today’s standards with respect to the
types of room configurations offered, computer facilities, social spaces and other amenities.
A year ago, the City Council approved a Special Use Permit for Deerpath Residence Hall to allow similar improvements. The recently completed Deerpath Hall project has received many
commendations from members of the community and has established a standard of quality for future renovations of residence halls. Like Deerpath Hall, the Nollen Hall project will go
beyond interior upgrades and the addition of space by including enhancements to the exterior of the existing building.
The Zoning Board of Appeals heard testimony from several neighbors who stated general support for the improvements proposed for Nollen Hall. In addition, the neighbors identified issues
including noise from the campus, the appearance of the trash collection areas and the need for an overall landscaping plan, that need to be addressed. The Board recognized that the
planned improvements to Nollen address some of the issues raised, but not all of them. The Board encouraged the College to continue to move forward to complete the College Master Plan.
The Master Plan will comprehensively address many of the concerns raised and as part of the City review of that plan, there will be many opportunities for public input.
The Zoning Board of Appeals voted unanimously to recommend approval of the Special Use Permit to the City Council subject to several conditions of approval.
The ordinance with findings and conditions is attached beginning on page 21.
The Zoning Board of Appeals’ report is attached beginning on page 26.
Recommended Action: Waive first reading and grant final approval to an ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit for Lake Forest College to recognize the existing use and to allow
for the expansion and renovation of Nollen Residence Hall.
4. Consideration of an ordinance authorizing the Acquisition of Real Estate
PRESENTED BY CITY MANAGER ROBERT KIELY (847) 615-4271
On November 18, 1999, the City Council adopted Resolution 99-27 which endorsed the Ad Hoc Municipal Services Committee’s recommendation to expand Municipal Services at its current location
on Laurel avenue, and as authorized, the Mayor and City Manager to negotiate the acquisition of an adjacent 3.5 acre parcel of land. The Mayor and City Manager have secured the necessary
MAI appraisal and have submitted a bona-fide offer based on said appraisals to the owner of the property. The City Council will be meeting in Executive Session prior to the regular
Counsel Meeting to determine whether it is in the City’s best interest to proceed with the passage of the ordinance and institute eminent domain proceedings. A copy of the proposed
ordinance is attached on page 46.
Recommendation: Pending City Council consideration of this matter in Executive Session
OLD BUSINESS
NEW BUSINESS
1. Consideration of a Report and Recommendation from the Plan Commission for Final Approval of a 2-Lot Subdivision and a Special Use Permit for Property Located at 611 Rosemary Road
(Peper Subdivision) (Second Reading and Final Approval)
PRESENTED BY SENIOR PLANNER CATHERINE CZERNIAK (615-4299)
On November 12, 1999 the City Council granted tentative approval of the Peper Subdivision and first reading of the associated Special Use Permit subject to several conditions of approval
as recommended by the Plan Commission. The property proposed for subdivision is located on the southwest corner of Rosemary and Washington Roads. The subdivision will create a lot
for the existing farm house and a vacant lot to the west of the farm house.
On January 12, 2000 the Plan Commission held a public hearing to consider final approval of the subdivision. The Commission reviewed the progress made to date on the various conditions
of approval. The Commission voted 5 to 1 to recommend final approval of the subdivision and Special Use Permit to the City Council based on the fact that the necessary conditions of
approval have been satisfied. A review of the conditions is provided in the attached Plan Commission report beginning on Page 49.
Recommended Action: Grant final approval of the subdivision and an ordinance granting a Special Use Permit subject to the conditions of approval recommended by the Plan Commission.
2. Approval of Leases for the Grove School Cultural Campus
PRESENTED BY CITY MANAGER ROBERT KIELY, JR. (615-4271)
In October 1997, the City acquired a 26+ acre site located on the east side of Ridge Road between Old Mill and Old Elm Road. For more than sixty years, the former Grove School occupied
this site as a school for handicapped and disabled children.
In March 1998, the Grove School Blue Ribbon Committee was appointed and charged with identifying uses for the property that would be in the best interest of the entire community. The
Lake Forest/Lake Bluff Senior Center, Lake Forest Symphony/Music Institute, and the City’s Recreation Department stepped forward and expressed their interest in occupying three of the
buildings on the site. Temporary use permits were then approved for the Lake Forest Symphony/Music Institute and Gorton Community Center to occupy two of the buildings on a short-term
basis. The City Council has subsequently approved an ordinance creating a special use permit to allow a cultural campus at Grove School.
At this time, the City Council is asked to consider the approval of three long-term uses as follows:
Organization Building Lease Term Lake Forest Symphony/Music Institute Volwiler Hall five years Lake Forest/Lake Bluff Senior Center Dickinson Hall 20 years Recreation Department Dickinson
Hall 20 years
The proposed leases are consistent with the guidelines developed by the Grove School Subcommittee of the Finance Committee appointed by Mayor Kerr to review the leasing structure and
financing of improvements to the Grove School property.
Discussion of these leases was tabled from the January 3, 2000 meeting so that additional information could be obtained for the Lake Forest Symphony/Music Institute proposed lease.
Copies of the proposed leases are attached beginning on page 64.
Recommended Action:
a) Approval of the lease with the Lake Forest/Lake Bluff Senior Center for Dickinson Hall for
the period of January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2019;
b) Approval of the lease with the Lake Forest Recreation Center for a portion of Dickinson Hall
for the period of January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2019; and
c) Approval of the lease with the Lake Forest Symphony/Music Institute for Volwiler Hall for
the period of January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2004.
3. Discussion on Grove School Environmental Remediation
PRESENTED BY MAX SLANKARD, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (615-4216)
In March, 1998, the City purchased the Grove School property from Bethany Methodist. As part of the acquisition negotiations, an escrow was established to provide funds for the remediation
of an oil storage tank in the basement of Dickinson Hall, in addition to the clean up of some oil-impacted soils adjacent to the building. One of the requirements of the escrow was that
the City Council make a formal determination as to the development of the property prior to undertaking any remediation activities.
On May 3, 1999, the City Council approved the report of the Grove School Blue Ribbon Committee regarding future use of the campus. Subsequently, on September 16, 1999, the City Council
approved a Special Use Permit for the Grove property to be used as a cultural campus. At the same time, the City Council entered into an agreement with ERM North Central to provide turnkey
services for the environmental remediation, with a not-to-exceed amount of $45,000. It was the goal of the City Council at that time to clean the property and secure from the IEPA a
“No Further Remediation” letter. Work began under that contract in November, 1999, with the removal of the tank from Dickinson Hall. The element of the work that has not taken place
is the removal of soil adjacent to the structure. The reason for this delay is the presence of two significant white oak tree immediately adjacent to the west side of Dickinson Hall.
The removal of the soil would pose a significant threat to these trees. The contractor has been evaluating methods of achieving closure of the site, while not impacting these trees.
It is the conclusion of the contractor that, if the soil on the west side of the building is not removed, then deed restrictions would have to be placed on the property. These restrictions
will likely include a provision for non-disturbance of soils below two feet in the areas immediately adjacent to the building; the maintenance of the floor slab in the building; and
a restriction on installation of on-site potable water wells. If the Council is not willing to accept these restrictions, then the soil must be removed, and the trees will likely be
killed. It is the staff’s feeling that the contemplated restrictions will not impact the ability of the City to develop the property as currently envisioned.
Attached in the packet beginning on page 87 is an aerial photo of Dickinson Hall indicating the trees under discussion, and a memorandum from City Arborist Dan Reeves, noting his concerns.
A representative from ERM North Central will be present to discuss the potential impacts of the contemplated deed restrictions.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council direct ERM to proceed with the remediation in such a way that the two oaks be saved, recognizing that this will result in
deed restrictions on the Grove property.
4. Authorization for the Purchase of Three Police Patrol Vehicles
PRESENTED BY THE SUPERINTEDNENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
MICHAEL THOMAS (615-4265)
The City of Lake Forest operates twelve marked and six unmarked police vehicles for its daily patrol and investigative operations. Nine of the marked squads are 1996 Chevrolet Caprices
and have been refurbished at the 90,000 mile mark; the other three are 2000 Chevrolet Impalas. The refurbishment process included new engines, transmissions and all other major components.
Refurbishing these cars was at the time, the most cost effective means of providing the officers with safe, reliable vehicles. However, as the market for used Caprices has changed,
it has become a better economic decision to purchase new vehicles. The available vehicles include the Ford Explorer, Crown Victoria, and the Chevrolet Tahoe and Impala 2000. Staff
cannot justify the expense of the Explorer nor the Tahoe. The Crown Victoria, although used by many state, county, and municipal police departments, is not staff’s first choice due
to both maintenance and driver comfort concerns. In terms of maintenance, the City utilized Ford Crown Victorias for the years 1992-1994, and at that point, the units posed a safety
concern with unpredictable acceleration problems. They also incurred numerous oil seal “blow outs” and slippage in the transmissions. The current Crown Victoria’s base price is approximately
$1,225 higher than the Chevrolet Impala. Chevrolet recently debuted the Impala 2000 as a car that was designed first and foremost for police use. The new Impalas are front-wheel drive
and are somewhat smaller than the Chevrolet Caprices but larger than the Chevrolet Luminas (no longer built with the police package). The City Council authorized purchase of three Chevrolet
Impalas on July 15th, 1999. These units were put into service in early January 2000 and so far have been extremely good cars.
Due to heavy daily use and the mileage that accrues, all of the refurbished police marked squad units are on a 190,000 mile replacement schedule. Staff has budgeted for two more units
in this fiscal year. However, due to both GM production and the third unit having over 160,000 miles, staff requests that a third unit be purchased but paid for via F.Y. 2001 capital
equipment funds. By ordering these cars in early February, the City does not expect to take delivery until mid-late May, 2000. If staff was to wait until May, 2000 to order the third
unit, GM’s production of these cars would not occur until late November.
Based upon the companies that provided bids to the City in July, 1999, updated quotes were received for the purchase of three new squad cars. Staff also received a bid for the outright
purchase of the three existing units.
Bid Tab for Impalas
Dealership Impala Bid * 3 Units Package Trade -In Price Net Price
Shepard Chevrolet $19,422.37 $58,267.11 $9,900 $48,367.11
Miles Chevrolet (State Bid) $19,282.88 $57,848.64 $9,000 $48,848.64
Bernard Chevrolet $19,731.82 $59,195.46 $7,500 $51,695.46
Bid Tab for Used Vehicles
Company Package Price for 3 Caprices with 190,000 miles
Chicago Motors $6,666
RECOMMENDED ACTION: The City budgeted $86,000 in F.Y. 2000 to replace five marked squad cars. Three were purchased in July, 1999. It is recommended that Shepard Chevrolet be awarded
the bid for the purchase of three police patrol vehicles in the net amount of $48,367.11,; two of the three units will be paid for via F.Y. 2000 funds (which is $7,456.06 under the budget
amount of $39,700.80). The third unit will be paid for via the F.Y. 2001 capital equipment fund.
APPROVAL OF AUTHORIZED INVOICES AND PAYROLLS
During the month of January 2000, the following amounts were disbursed from the Cashier’s Account:
GENERAL FUND, IMRF, & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT WATER TOTALS
INVOICES 1,142,522.47 445,495.91 1,588,018.38 PAYROLL 799,046.38 116,591.88 915,638.26 TOTALS 1,941,568.85 562,087.79 2,503,656.64
AUTHORIZATION OF TREASURER’S WARRANTS TO MEET EXPENSES OF February, 2000
The motion to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign such warrants as may be necessary to meet the February, 2000 audited accounts.
ADDITIONAL ITEMS FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION
EXECUTIVE SESSION
ADJOURNMENT
Office of the City Manager
February 4, 2000
The City of Lake Forest is subject to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Individuals with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who require
certain accommodations in order to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting, or who have questions regarding the accessibility of the meeting or the facilities, are required
to contact City Manager Robert R. Kiely, Jr., at (847) 234-2600 promptly to allow the City to make reasonable accommodations for those persons.
City Council Agenda
February 7, 2000 Page 11 of 1