Loading...
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 2013/02/27 MinutesThe City of Lake Forest Historic Preservation Commission Proceedings of the February 27, 2013 Meeting A regular meeting of the Lake Forest Historic Preservation Commission was held on Wednesday, February 27, 2013, at 6:30 p.m., at the City of Lake Forest City Hall, 220 E. Deerpath, Lake Forest, Illinois. Historic Preservation Commissioners present: Chairman Kurt Pairitz, Commissioners Bill Ransom, Fred Moyer, Jim Preschlack, John Travers, Susan Rafferty Athenson and Mary Ellen Swenson Commissioners absent: None City staff present: Catherine Czerniak, Director of Community Development and Megan Neuman, Planner 1. Introduction of Commissioners and staff, overview of meeting procedures – Chairman Pairitz Chairman Pairitz reviewed the meeting procedures followed by the Commission and asked the members of the Commission and staff to introduce themselves. 2. Approval of the meeting minutes. There was no action taken on this item. NON-RESIDENTIAL PETITION 3. Consideration of a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for site and building modifications including changes to the parking lot, driveway, lighting, landscaping and entrance at the Church of the Holy Spirit, 400 E. Westminster. Owner: Church of the Holy Spirit Representatives: Sarah Alward and David Yocca, Conservation Design Forum Chairman Pairitz asked the members of the Commission to declare any conflicts of interest or Ex Parte contacts. Commissioner Preschlack recused himself from participating in review of this agenda item due to his involvement in the Church. Mr. Buerkle, Senior Warden, Church of the Holy Spirit, introduced the project. He stated that the intent of the project is to provide a framework for the stewardship of the Church and the site, to preserve the Church and the campus for long term , for the next generation. He stated that the property is historic and that the intention is to do the project right to avoid any regrets after the work is completed. He stated that the goals of the project are to be respectful of the site and the community, to address safety issues and to make the Church accessible for all who choose to worship there. He Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 27, 2013 - Page 2 stated that over half of the congregation is over 60 years old. He noted the attempt to do this project using a transparent and collaborative process. He stated that town hall meetings were held and neighbors, as well as members of the Church, were invited to provide input. He stated that the plans that were developed reflect the input received. He reviewed the goal s of the project stating an interest in meeting important functional needs on the site with minimum change to the property. He reviewed the functional needs of the site including: improved accessibility, accessible parking spaces, pedestrian safety, drainage improvements, repair of deteriorated asphalt, minimizing the removal of healthy pl ants and improved environmental stewardship and sustainability of the site. He stated that there is an interest in optimizing the long term benefits while minimizing the short term implementation costs. He reviewed the key elements of the plan noting the proposed reconfiguration of the parking lot to improve traffic flows and address drainage, the addition of a pedestrian walkway, enhanced exterior lighting, reconfiguration of the circle driveway and removal of the steps at the main entrance to the Church and removal of the curbing to provide for barrier free access. He stated that the proposed plan addresses the project goals, minimizes change on the site and preserves the architectural character of the building. He pointed out that the plan addresses accessibility issues without the addition of ramps or rails. He stated that the current accessible parking spaces do not comply with ADA regulations. He noted that the proposed work improves pedestrian pathways and separates pedestrians from vehicles. He noted that site drainage will be improved through some re-grading, the addition of bioswales and low impact plantings. He stated that the proposed lighting will improve visibility without visible glare. He acknowledged that there are some important elements of the plan that still need to be finalized but stated that approval by the Commission of the key functional aspects of the plan is requested to allow work to move forward. He explained the timeline stating that the work on the parking lot is planned for this summer, a time of lower activity at the Church. He stated that repairs to the parking lot are long overdue. He stated that the change to the front entrance is an important element of the plan and explained that the elevation between Westminster and the entrance would be modified to allow elimination of the steps at the Church entrance. He reviewed the pending issues noting that final landscape and lighting plans need to be prepared and that final selection of the pavers needs to occur. He stated the intent to complete the plans consistent with the philosophy of the Commission and in a manner that preserves the integrity of property. He noted that the lighting plan will provide for safety on the site in a manner that is unobtrusive to the neighbors. He stated that the lighting needs to be durable and facilitate snow removal . He stated that the aesthetics, number, color of the light fixtures along with the intensity of the light will all be balanced with impacts on neighboring properties. He added that the lighting plan will recognize that the site is not always used in the evenings. He stated that in concept, the landscape of the site will remain pastoral, but will be sustainable. He stated that prairie plantings are not proposed. He stated that the pavers for the parkway, driveway and pedes trian paths will be selected to draw from the stone of the building and to differentiate usage areas. He stated that the intent is to keep the hardscape simple and functional. He clarified that the stone is not intended as a decorative element of the plan. He introduced Mr. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 27, 2013 - Page 3 Yocca of Conservation Design Forum noting that the firm is the premiere firm of its type in the Country. Dave Yocca, Principal, Conservation Design Forum, stated that he will provide some background on the design decisions that led to the proposed plan. He stated that the plans were developed through a nine month process using a comprehensive approach. He stated that the intention is to address all of the issues on the site with this single major capital improvement project. He stated that this solution is intended to last for 50 plus years. He noted that over the years, the Church itself, the building, has under gone change. He noted that careful attention was paid to the changes to the building, but not to the site. He presented the site plan indicating where pavement is proposed. He confirmed that work is still underway to finalize the landscape and lighting plans. He noted that alternatives for the layout of the site were studied and a decision was made to work within the footprints of the existing pavement and green space. He explained that the changes will be small and will not likely be noticed by someone who is not familiar with the site. He noted that only a few parking spaces are added. He stated that a key goal is to provide more parking spaces that are easy, convenient and safe for use by the elderly. He stated that as presented, the plan exceeds the number of accessible spaces that are required on the site. He explained that accessible spaces are provided at both the east and west primary entrances. He stated that accessible access is necessary at both entrances since the Church really functions as two buildings, each with different uses. He reviewed the parking lot layout noting that vehicle circulation is improved to better accommodate comings and goings between services. He stated that the driveway entrance to the main parking lot remains generally in its existing location. He stated that the driveway entrance from Wisconsin Avenue is proposed to be widened from the current 15’ width to accommodate two-way traffic. He stated that the Church is aware of the need to be sensitive to the aesthetics of a wider driveway on the Wisconsin Avenue streetscape he noted however that a wider driveway on to Wisconsin Avenue is important from an operational and emergency access perspective. He stated that the Church is looking for guidance on this issue. He discussed the parking lot noting that the existing asphalt will be removed along with the trees in the existing islands. He noted that most of the trees are dead or diseased but acknowledged that one 21-inch Red Oak tree will be removed but pointed out that it has a large hollow space in the trunk and its longevity is questionable. He stated that shade trees are proposed in the new islands which are configured to allow the trees to thrive. He discussed the proposed reconfiguration of the circle drive at the main entrance to the Church. He again noted that various alternatives were explored to achieve the goal of making the entrance accessible to people and vehicles. He noted that the radius of the existing circle drive is too tight with parking currently permitted along the outside of the circle. He stated that the existing parking spaces in the circle do not meet the requirements for accessible spaces. He stated that the reconfigured circle drive softens the curve while generally keeping the pavement at the same width. He stated that the geometry of the circle is different with the new plan and the grade is raised eliminating the need for steps . He discussed the entrance to the Church stating that options, including ramps, were Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 27, 2013 - Page 4 studied in an effort to explore ways to make the main entrance to the Church accessible. He noted that all options studied, except the one presented to the Commission, involved modifying the façade of the building or placing railings or switchback ramps near the entrance. He noted that the desire is to allow people with limited mobility to use the same path of arrival as others. He discussed lighting noting that much of campus is dark. He provided a plan of the existing lighting and described the existing light fixtures. He explained that the intent is to provide a higher quality and more visible lighting while minimizing any off site visibility of the lighting. He stated that the lights were selected to be compatible with the Church and with the neighborhood. He stated that the proposed lights provide a wider distribution of light than the existing lights by installing more poles at a lower height. He noted that the concrete poles and the light fixtures were selected to be consistent with, but smaller than the City street lights. He reviewed a plan showing the distribution of light noting that light would be directed away from the property lines. He stated that the Church is considering an LED light for efficiency, durability, better color rendition and improved visibility. He stated that a different approach to lighting is being considered for the east side of the property. He noted that the current plan requires the relocation of two City streetlights to allow the proposed modifications to the existing driveways. He stated that in addition to the pole lights, both bollard and ground mounted lights are being considered. He stated that the Church is sensitive to the appearance of lights at night noting that both the number of lights and the brightness will be considered as lighting is studied further. He provided some renderings of proposed landscaping noting areas that are delineated to remain as turf and the general intent for the distribution of new trees. He noted the intent to replace dead and dying trees and to build succession into the plan by staggering the plantings to achieve a sustainable natural tree canopy over time. He stated that the lower plantings at the entrances and as part of the rain garden are still being finalized. He noted that there is the opportunity for flexibility in the rain gardens with options for permeable pavers, turf or plantings. He stated that overall , plantings on the site will be organized as part of a formal plan. Ms. Czerniak provided an overview of the various components of the project. She stated that in general, the re-working of the parking lot, within the existing footprint, and reconfiguring the drive aisles and planting islands appears appropriate. She noted that the parking lot is not an historic aspect of the site. She requested Commission input on the proposed hardscape materials and the variety of colors proposed to distinguish the usage of various areas. She acknowledged that based on the presentation , staff understands that the site lighting is still being studied and considered by the Church. She agreed that careful attention to the type of lighting, lighting intensity levels, locations and numbers of fixtures need to be carefully considered in the context of the historic nature of the site and the surrounding residential neighborhood. She requested Commission input on the lighting concepts presented to date. She admitted that the existing shoebox lights are not historically significant, but noted that they do direct light downward, rather than allowing light to spill out in other directions. She acknowledged that the proposed light poles and fixtures are generally consistent with the City street lights but noted that the street lights are along streets, generally in front of homes , and Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 27, 2013 - Page 5 are spaced a considerable distance apart. She noted that many fixtures are proposed in the parking lot and in some cases could illuminate the side or rear yards or elevations of surrounding homes. She discussed the Wisconsin Avenue driveway noting that this driveway has always been a concern to the neighborhood. She explained that the maximum width of driveways in residential neighborhoods is 16’. She noted that this driveway has served as a secondary ingress/egress from the Church parking lot for use during peak times, but was not intended for use on a daily basis or for high volume traffic. She noted the neighbors’ concerns that widening the driveway will change the character of the neighborhood streetscape. She reviewed the proposed changes to the main entrance noting that the east side of the site has the most historic integrity. She acknowledged the goal of improving accessibility to this part of the Church and noted that the changes proposed in this area merit further study. She stated that the proposed grade changes will bring the top of the circular drive up to the level of the threshold at the entrance to the Church. She noted that this change appears to truncate the entrance, reducing the verticality of the Gothic arches and settling the building into the ground. She stated that the proposed retaining walls on either side of the entrance further diminish the verticality of the entrance. She noted that the staff report suggests some options for Commission action including approving a portion of the project and continuing other aspects to allow for further study, or continuing the entire petition to allow further study and refinement of the project overall. She stated that allowing work to proceed on the parking lot reconfiguration could help the Church meet the planned timeline. She noted that a number of letters were received both in support of and expressing concerns about this petition and were all provided to the Commission. In response to questions from Commissioner Travers, Mr. Yocca clarified that the photometric plan provided indicates the lighting levels at the pavement based on the exterior lighting as proposed. He stated that a photometric plan illustrating the existing lighting levels was not prepared. He acknowledged that with the existing low light conditions, there is currently not much light spillover on to neighboring properties. He stated that the proposed lighting is intended to provide a better distribution of light on the site and eliminate dark areas. He stated that there will be minimal lighting at the property lines and little light spilling upward or on to neighboring properties. In response to questions from Commissioner Swenson, Mr. Yocca confirmed that the plan presented proposes to increase the number of light poles from 11 to 20 explaining that the light poles are reduced in height to get a better distribution of light but as a result, more lights are needed. He stated that the lights will be a yellowish tone, not the same color as the street lights, less white and less bright. In response to questions from Commissioner Swenson, Ms. Czerniak stated that the City does not have any photometric standards. She noted however that the community is historically very dark, intentionally. She noted that the City’s lighting guidelines require that the source of the light not be visible and that lighting be directed downward. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 27, 2013 - Page 6 Commissioner Ransom commented that with the number of lights proposed, even if there is no spillover, the presence of the lights will create hotspots. He stated that these glaring spots will likely be a concern for the neighbors. He stated appreciation for the effort to aesthetically match the style of the streetlights but stated that it may be more important to find a light that reduces impact on the surrounding area by cutting the number of lights and shielding the visible hotspots. He stated that once the lights are installed, it will be difficult to make any changes. He stated that more study is needed on how the lighting should be done to shield the neighborhood from impacts. In response to questions from the Commission, Mr. Yocca explained that there are optics inside the fixture and that although the light will be visible, it will not be glaring. He stated that there has been a great deal of progress in the area of lighting and as a result, the light poles can be lower and still provide even more light than the taller poles. Chairman Pairitz observed that the Steinberg fixture presented shows the LED lamp mounted in the crown of the fixture to achieve a downward cast of light. He stated his expectation that the glass may be frosted to further conceal the source of the light. He suggested that the petitioner identify some other locations that have similar lighting levels to those anticipated at this site to allow an understanding of the light level proposed. He noted that the petitioner seems to have an understanding of the sensitivities around lighting and is looking for a solution that is appealing aesthetically and addresses the issues. In response to questions from the Commission, Mr. Buerkle stated that the lighting levels proposed at the Church are significantly less than lighting levels at commercial installations. He stated that a shoebox type fixture could be reconsidered however the intent was to use new technologies to improve upon the current aesthetics. He suggested that a mock-up of the proposed light fixture on the site could be installed. He stated that activities at the Church vary day by day but agreed that a plan for reducing lighting in some areas, at some times, could be considered. The Commission agreed that a mock-up of the proposed light fixture and light intensity would be helpful. Reverend Sidebotham stated that the shoebox lights are currently on all through the night but stated that he still stumbles in the darkness from his house to the Church. He stated that it is a safety issue for him and for many parishioners. He stated an interest in avoiding glaring lights for his own benefit as a neighboring resident and for the benefit of the larger community. In response to questions from Chairman Pairitz, Mr. Yocca discussed the proposed hardscape. He stated that a pavement system of uni-lock pavers is proposed for all of the areas that are currently concrete or asphalt. He explained that the pavers will be part of the on site water management system and were selected for durability. He stated that the colors of the various pavers were selected to delineation use areas, to Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 27, 2013 - Page 7 minimize the need for signage and to relate to the building. He clarified that colored pavers are proposed instead of painted lines in the parking lot and to separate pedestrian and vehicle use areas. He added that the pavers are intended to break up the mass of paving. He stated that the use of color pavers and the color tones are still being studied. Commissioner Athenson observed that introducing colored hardscape may detract from the historic character of the Church. In response to question from Commissioner Ransom, Mr. Yocca confirmed that no barrier curb is proposed between the sidewalk and the parking lot. He noted the location of the drop off area adjacent to the sidewalk. Commissioner Ransom asked that use of a barrier curb should be considered further from a safety and operations perspective. Chairman Pairitz stated that a barrier curb keeps cars off of the sidewalk and defines the vehicle zone. He noted that the difference in the color of the pavement appears to be subtle which may work against its effectiveness in separating vehicles and pedestrians. He commented on the entrance off of Wisconsin Avenue acknowledging the interests of the residents in that area to maintain a residential feel to the entrance. He stated that the addition of an island in that driveway will only exaggerate the non- residential character. Commissioner Ransom commented that in his opinion, a wider driveway on Wisconsin Avenue in not necessary. Commissioner Athenson suggested that the landscaping along Wisconsin Avenue, near the driveway, be enhanced noting the care being given to landscaping at the front of the Church. She noted that this driveway was intended as a secondary driveway, not a main access, and noted that neighbors commented that in the past, the driveway was closed with a chain except during times of peak activity. Commissioner Swenson commented that the layout of the new parking lot looks more functional than the existing lot. In response to questions from Commissioner Swenson and Ransom, Melissa, the Director of the Church Preschool explained the drop off and pick up operations for the preschool noting that currently, parents walk children in to the Church. She stated that 40 to 50 children are dropped off per day. Reverend Sidebottom added that the drop off and pickup area is used by others, besides children, on Sundays and at other times. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 27, 2013 - Page 8 Chairman Pairitz suggested that thought be given to whether the driveway on Wisconsin Avenue should be an exit only to facilitate the drop off/pickup operations but noted that allowing it to remain two-way preserves flexibility. He noted however that it should be retained as a diminutive access and not be widened. In response to questions from Commissioner Ransom, Mr. Yocca discussed the existing and proposed locations of the trash collection area. He stated the proposed location will make trash pickup easier. He stated that gaining additional parking spaces is not the driving force in relocating the trash area. He acknowledged that the new location is adjacent to a residential neighbor. Mike Cully, Church property committee, stated that currently, cones are put out to block off parking spaces so the garbage truck can maneuver. Ms. Czerniak noted that the current trash area appears to be visible to the neighbor but that the proposed location appears to be tucked in near the neighbor’s garage and blocked from view. Commissioner Ransom suggested that consideration be given to whether the enclosure can be minimized or covered in some way. Commissioner Athenson suggested that plantings along the property line could buffer the neighbor. In response to questions from Commissioner Travers, Mr. Yocca reviewed the location of the existing perimeter fencing and noted areas where the fence will be re-located near the southern edge of the property. He stated that the plan is to ultimately erect a new fence all around the property but that for now, the existing fence around the parking lot will remain. In response to questions from Commissioner Athenson, Mr. Yocca stated that for stormwater management, narrow trenches are proposed along the perimeter of the Church property to direct stormwater around the parking lot. He stated that the trenches will limit the plantings that can occur. He confirmed that some shade trees are planned, but a perimeter hedge will not be possible. In response to questions from Chairman Pairitz, Ms. Czerniak confirmed that City engineering staff will review drainage and grading plans and the materials proposed for the parking lot prior to the issuance of a permit authorizing construction. She confirmed that if desired by the Commission, approval of the parking lot reconfiguration could be advanced with a condition that a complete landscape be presented to the Commission at a later date. He asked the Commission for comments and questions on the alterations proposed for the east side of the site. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 27, 2013 - Page 9 In response to a question from Commissioner Swenson, Mr. Yocca said that currently, heating elements in the hardscape near the entrances has not been considered. In response to a request from Commissioner Athenson, Mr. Yocca displayed the existing and proposed front entrance. Commissioner Athenson observed that with the proposed changes, the entrance is diminished due to the expansive hardscape and removal of the steps. She acknowledged that accessibility to the entrance is necessary and asked for information on the other alternatives considered. She noted that preserving the formality of the entrance and the tradition of steps up to a Church is important. In response to questions from Commissioners Athenson and Ransom, Mr. Yocca stated that there really was not a second best alternative for the entrance treatment. He stated that the alternative presented is the only alternative that provides access without the addition of railings, ramps or additional openings in the building façade. Mr. Buerkle agreed that aesthetically, the steps are the better treatment however; he stated that accessibility was determined to take priority. He added that the emergency exit from the south side of the sanctuary, to the right of the main entrance, also is not at grade and therefore, not an accessible egress. He noted that the proposed grade change would make both exits at grade. In response to questions from Commissioner Swenson, Mr. Yocca explained that the proposed seat walls on either side of the entrance are retaining walls that are required due to the grade change. He added that the walls also provide seating. He agreed that there may be a way to landscape the walls to help mitigate the grade change and perceived height of the arches. Commissioner Moyer stated support for the overall project but noted that the proposed removal of the steps is the least successful part of the project. He stated that the change would be a detriment to the building. He stated that the solution is to keep the steps and find another way to provide accessibility without raising the elevation in front of the building. He commented that changing grade will change the view from the streetscape, essentially reducing the height of the building and subtracting from its character. He stated that an entrance is important for any building and particularly for a church. Mr. Yocca reviewed the alternatives considered for making the front entrance accessible noting the impacts on the building and the layout of ramps, using a series of switchbacks, that would be needed. He stated that the impacts of the alternatives were determined to be more intrusive than raising the grade. Commissioner Moyer observed that the alternatives studied may not be the final solution, but are a better direction than the one presented. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 27, 2013 - Page 10 In response to questions from Chairman Pairitz, Mr. Yocca pointed out that the distance between the west entrance and the sanctuary is 270 feet, a significant distance. He stated that for many parishioners, traversing this distance is a problem. Chairman Pairitz invited public comment. Ms. Coleman, 461 E. Westminster, stated that she submitted correspondence to the Commission. She stated that many of her concerns have been raised in the discussion. She added that lighting is a major concern stating that she will see every light from her house. She stated that the Church, particularly the east end, is historic as is the neighborhood. She stated that there are al ternative ways to address accessibility needs rather than changing the grade as proposed. She questioned whether the front entrance needs to be accessible. She expressed concern about the changes proposed for the front circle noting that 34% more hard surface will be added. Ms. Morris, a neighbor on Church Road, stated that she has lived in her house for 38 years, has completed renovations and has won an award from the Preservation Foundation. She stated that as a neighbor, she believes that the Westminster streetscape belongs to everyone. She questioned the proposed changes noting that losing the openness and simplicity will be a loss to the community. She stated that lighting is a concern to the neighbors and asked that it be carefully considered. She asked the Commission to make sure the true impact of the lighting is understood before it is approved. She stated that down lighting may be more appropriate given the surroundings. She stated support for re-doing the parking lots. A member of the Church for 30 years stated that she has been actively involved in the Church and is not just a passerby or someone who drops off her children. She stated that the Church is an important part of the community and is a living organism, not just a building. She stated that 50% of the parishioners are over 60 years old and they should not be relegated to a separate entrance and not able to enter at the front door. She asked that the Commission think about people, not just about buildings. She stated that the second alternative using ramps is far more destructive to the Church and would remove the sense of welcome, arrival, intimacy and sacredness of the space. Julie Priebe stated that she has lived in the community since 1955 and has been a member of the Church for 58 years. She stated that the architecture of the Church is very important. She stated that there are other ways to provide accessibility to the Church noting that more railings could be added. She reviewed her experience in accessing the Church at a time when she had limited mobility noting that she successfully used the accessible entrance for three months. She stated that the accessibility issue can be worked out without destroying the architectural character of the Church. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 27, 2013 - Page 11 Resident, 1291 Green Bay Road, stated that she is a member of the Church and explained that it takes 25 minutes for her mother to get from the west entrance of the Church to the sanctuary. She stated that everyone should be able to get into the Church and not be exhausted when they get to the sanctuary. She stated that her mother cannot navigate even one step. She stated that the circle drive as proposed becomes gracious and noted that the elevation of the ground area will not change much. She implored the Commission to think of those who do not have mobility and allow them to access the front of the church. Art Miller, 169 Wildwood Road, provided some history on the Church noting its construction in 1902 and later additions. He stated that changing the grade as proposed will have a negative impact on the historic character of the Church. He commented that perhaps the grade change can be managed with the use of color or terracing but added that the proposed change in effect lowers the east, most historic, part of the building. He stated that the Presbyterian Church, a few blocks away, deals with similar issues noting that an accessible entrance is provided at the west side of the building and an elevator is provided at another entrance. He stated that the distance from the west entrance is probably similar to what exists here. He stated that there are alternatives one being to do nothing and another to bring in someone with different areas of expertise and alternative views. Chairman Pairitz summarized that the consensus of the Commission seems to be that further study of the changes proposed to the east side of the site is needed. He stated that this is an important project and stated appreciation for the work that has gone into the project so far. He stated that with respect to the changes proposed for the west side of the property, more information is needed on the lighting. He suggested that thought be given to zones of illumination and lighting intensity. He suggested that other parking lots be looked at to understand the lighting levels that are appropriate at this site. He noted the importance of selecting the right fixture. He commented on the proposed changes near the main entrance stating that there is something u nsatisfying about the plan presented. He commented that the proposed circle drive feels much broader than the drive that exists today. He stated that overall, the current entrance feels much more modest than what is proposed. He challenged the petitioner to think about the project differently and suggested that there are likely more alternatives than a switch back ramp. Commissioner Athenson emphasized the importance of the formality of the front entry to the Church. She stated that it is important that the existin g character not be lost. She commented that the changes as proposed appear contemporary. She stated that there is a solution that will better meet all of the needs identified. She stated concern about the variety of brick colors proposed on the site and whether or not the color and patterns may dominate the site. She asked that a mock-up on the site or a true to color rendering be provided. She stated that the Wisconsin Avenue entrance should be better maintained and should retain the residential character of the street. She asked Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 27, 2013 - Page 12 that consideration be given to providing additional screening along the west edge of the parking lot to protect the homes from the parking lot and the lights. Commissioner Ransom agreed that more information is needed on the proposed color of the pavers. He stated that as presented, the colors appear stark, but as described, the difference intended may be subtle and more related to textures. Commissioner Travers noted the importance of considering functionality and commented that it may be appropriate for the Church to look a little smaller or less grand if that approach allows parishioners to walk into Church together. He stated that lighting is important and should be presented to the Commission in a way that allows the Commission to assess what is proposed and the design principles that led to the solution such as whether minimizing illumination of the night sky is a guiding principle. He commented that a recent presentation on fences opened his eyes to the impact fences have on the community noting the existing stockade fence which will remain. Commissioner Swenson stated that she respects the need to make the Church more accessible and sees that need as paramount. She agreed that further study and explanation is needed on the lighting. Commissioner Ransom stated that there is a balance to be struck between accessibility and the historic nature and perceived height of the Church. He stated confidence that a good solution can be found with further study. He stated an appreciation for families with members that have disabilities noting his own experiences and stated that he is not unsympathetic to the Church’s interest in addressing that need. He stated that he believes that many elements of the project are good noting support for the reconfiguration of the parking lot. He stated that additional information is needed on the pavers and lighting. He agreed with previous suggestions for a mock-up or the opportunity to see a similar installation somewhere. Chairman Pairitz observed that today, the trees baffle the light coming from the site. He added that the broad, expansion lawn frames the entry. He commented that in the proposed plan, the tree canopy is replaced with small trees which exacerbate the potential for off-site light impacts. Commissioner Moyer stated that he is sensitive to concerns about illumination but stated confidence that a good outcome can be found. He agreed that having the opportunity to visit a parking lot with the proposed light levels or a mock up on the site would be helpful. He stated that the intended use of down lighting, an LED light source and appropriate fixtures are all good ideas, but noted that it is important for the Commission to understand the end result of the proposed installation in the context of the surroundings. He supported the proposed reconfiguration of the entry drive, without the grade change, stating that it appears more functional than the existing driveway and provides parking closer to the entry. He stated that he believes that both accessibility and preservation of the character of the building can be achieved. He Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 27, 2013 - Page 13 stated that the proposed use of pavers is an improvement upon an asphalt parking lot and enhances the pedestrian environment. He stated that more details are needed to get a sense of how it all comes together. Commissioner Swenson stated support for a curb in the circle to help guide parking. In response to questions from Chairman Pairitz, Mr. Buerkle and Mr. Yocca thanked the Commission and stated that the Church is trying to balance the various interests. They stated in interest in continuing to work with staff particularly to begin review of the engineering issues related to the project. In response to questions from Chairman Pairitz the Commission concluded that continuation of the petition would allow the necessary study and refinement to occur and encouraged coordination with City staff. Commissioner Athenson made a motion to continue the project to allow further study, refinement, revision and clarification of the plans to address the issues identified by the Commission. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Moyer and was unanimously approved by the Commission. RESIDENTIAL PETITION 4. Consideration of a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for facade alterations at 780 Barberry Lane. Owners: Michael and Joan Burke Representative: Ralph Hoffman, architect Chairman Pairitz asked the Commission for any conflicts of interest or Ex Parte contacts. Hearing none, he invited a presentation from the petitioner. Mr. Hoffman introduced the project explaining that changes are proposed on the rear elevation to accommodate interior changes. He stated that the house was built about 25 years ago and is an English Tudor cottage. He reviewed the existing elevation and the proposed changes. He discussed the changes proposed to windows on the first and second floors noting that the new windows will be more consistent with other areas of the house than the existing windows. He explaine d that this project will bring this part of the house into character with the rest of the house. He noted that although part of the original construction, the rear element of the house appears much more contemporary than the rest of the house. Ms. Neuman stated that the home was built in 1985 and is not identified as a Contributing Structure to the Historic District. She stated that the proposed work appears to be appropriate and consistent with the standards in the Code. She explained that although the project will provide additional living space in the Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 27, 2013 - Page 14 home, there is no change to the square footage of the house. She recommended approval of the project as presented. In response to questions from Commissioner Travers, Ms. Neuman explained that the work underway is exploratory and was authorized by a building permit. In response to questions from Commissioner Ransom, Mr. Hoffman stated that the new brick will match the existing brick. He stated that the infill will be done consistent with the existing coursing and limestone sills. Chairman Pairitz invited public comment, hearing none; he noted that matching the brick size will be important to the success of the project. He stated that if an exact color match cannot be found, the brick can be stained to match the existing brick. Commissioner Travers made a motion to grant a Certificate of Appropriateness for façade modifications as presented based on the findings in the staff report. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Swenson and was unanimously approved by the Commission. SIGNAGE PETITIONS 5. Consideration of a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for signage for a new business at 276 E. Deerpath. Owner: Lake Forest Management Tenant: The UPS Store Representative: Scott Bailey, Icon Identity Solutions, designer Chairman Pairitz asked for any conflicts of interest or Ex Parte contacts, hearing none; he invited a presentation from the petitioner. Mr. Bailey presented a sample of the proposed wood sign. He noted that two colors are proposed with a horizontal rake on the background. Ms. Neuman stated that late last year, the Commission approved a storefront alteration to allow a new door to be constructed to provide access into this space for a new tenant space. She stated that work is underway on that project. She explained that over time, there have been different configurations of this store front as the use of the tenant spaces and number of spaces has changed. She explained that a blank panel, in place of an earlier transom window, remains in place and provides an opportunity for signage. She noted this blank panel will be above the new door that is being installed. She stated that variety in signage types adds variety to the streetscape and would call out this new business as distinct from the business to the east. She stated that as currently proposed, th e signage is at the maximum allowed for the storefront and no additional window signage Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 27, 2013 - Page 15 would be permitted. She asked for Commission input on the proposed location and type of sign. In response to questions form Chairman Pairitz, Ms. Neuman confirmed that no lighting is proposed for the sign. She clarified that the sign regulations and guidelines do not require that signs be green, but limit signs to two colors, a muted color with a dark background, unless otherwise approved by the Commission. She reminded the Commission that the sign for Koenig and Strey, the business next door, was relocated from a previous installation and the Commission directed that the colors be reversed to provide white letters on a dark green background. She explained that if the Commission would like to see exploration of locating the sign in the blank panel above the door then continuation of the petition would be appropriate. She added that if the Commission is comfortable with the band sign as proposed, it would be appropriate to include a condition requiring that the blank panel above the door be replaced with a transom window to match the other windows in the building rather than allow it to remain as a blank sign panel . She confirmed that the rendering in the packet does not reflect the new door configuration. In response to questions from Commissioner Athenson, Ms. Neuman confirmed that with the band sign at the size proposed, the business would not be entitled to any other signs. She explained that since a sign in the transom over the door would be smaller, an additional sign would be permitted by the Code with that option. Commissioner Athenson expressed a concern that the band sign would not be visible to pedestrians. She noted that even in a vehicle, the band sign appears too high. She stated that a mock-up of the proposed sign would be helpful. In response to a question from Commissioner Travers, Mr. Hoffman confirmed that the sign will be solid wood. Commissioner Swenson commented that with the high gloss finish, the sign looks plastic. She suggested that a satin finish be considered. In response to questions from Commissioner Moyer, Mr. Hoffman confirmed that a horizontal grain is proposed as opposed to the vertical grain shown on the cut sheet. Commissioner Moyer suggested that consideration be given to a vertical grain for the background noting that rain would run off the sign instead of being retained. In response to questions from Commissioner Preschlack, Ms. Neuman stated that the proposed sign is similar to the Koenig and Strey sign in height, but is not as long. She stated that there is merit in considering a variety of signage types noting that window signs can be viewed by both pedestrians and those in vehicles. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 27, 2013 - Page 16 In response to questions from Chairman Pairitz, Ms. Neuman clarified that the size of a sign is measured to the outside of the overall sign, not just the lettering. Commissioner Swenson stated that the sign appears larger due to the size of the font. She suggested that consideration be given to making the font smaller. Commissioner Moyer stated that the boldness of the sign legitimizes the entrance to the business which in his opinion was an earlier mistake by the Commission. He stated that it further breaks the symmetry of the building. Commissioner Ransom stated support for the sign as proposed noting that it is consistent with what is permitted. Commissioner Athenson stated that the sign would be more visible in the transom and noted that location would provide the opportunity for additional pedestrian level signs. Chairman Pairitz asked for any public comment, hearing none, he commented that the sign reads bolder than the Koenig and Strey sign but stated that it is difficult to get a clear picture without the door being reflected in the rendering. He invited final comments from the Commission. Commissioner Swenson reiterated that a satin finish, rather than a high gloss, should be used. Commissioner Travers made a motion to grant a Certificate of Appropriateness approving the sign based on the findings in the staff report and subject to the conditions in the staff report with an additional condition requiring a satin finish. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Moyer and he added his opinion that allowing the transom to remain painted wood could better associate the sign with the door and again, mitigate the past mistake of the Commission. After further Commission discussion, Commissioner Travers modified his motion to remove condition #2 and allow the transom to remain as a solid panel. Commissioner Moyer having previously seconded the motion accepted the modification. The motion was approved by the Commission by a vote of 6 to 1 with Commissioner Athenson voting nay for reasons previously stated. 6. Consideration of a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for new awnings, signage and outdoor seating for a new business at 270 Market Square. Owner: Shawgate Lake Forest LLC Tenant: Laura Fellows, Jolly Good Fellows Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 27, 2013 - Page 17 Representative: Robert Ruggles, architect Chairman Pairitz asked the Commission for any conflicts of interest or Ex Parte contacts. Hearing none, he invited a presentation from the petitioner. Mr. Ruggles introduced the petition requesting approval for signage for a new business in Market Square. He stated that there are six components of the request and reviewed each. He explained that the first component is a sage green, fixed awning over the westernmost window. He stated that there are other awnings of similar shades in the Square. He stated that the fixed awning is intended to shade the window from full sun to protect the confections displayed in the window. He stated that the business name is proposed on the awning valance in 6” letters. He reviewed the second component, vinyl lettering on the south facing glass panels. He noted that five words are proposed in white, 6” lettering. He stated that this lettering will be mounted low and discreetly announce the products for sale. He reviewed the third component explaining that acrylic, pin type lettering is proposed above the south facing arched window, between the transom and the glass. He provided samples of the letters noting that the color is solid, not applied. He stated that the letters will not require maintenance. He summarized the south elevation reviewing all three components. He moved around the building and described the fourth component noting that pin letters, identical to those on the south side would be affixed to the band above the east facing window describing the products for sale. He described the fifth component of the request, the projecting sign. He explained that the hanging sign is metal, with a wrought iron appearance. He stated that the sign would be powder coated steel and would be supported by a bracket installed in the mortar joints. He stated that the sign is 26” in diameter and announces the name of the business, the type of business and displays a cupcake graphic. He stated that the colors were chosen to compliment the colors of Market Square and to be whimsical and call attention to the business. He explained that the sign would hang about 3’ off the building and be mounted at 8’1/2 feet above the sidewalk. He stated that the sign would hang off of the corner of the building and project straight south. He explained the sixth and final component of the request, the seasonal outdoor seating. He stated that the area provides 5’ of clear public sidewalk for pedestrians. Ms. Neuman stated that this request is before the Commission for review of several aspects, consideration of a request for signage in excess of what is permitted by the Code, consideration of the color and style of the awning and consideration of the proposed projecting sign. She stated staff support for the amount of signage proposed based on the size and location of the space. She stated that conditions of approval are provided in the staff report to assure that each aspect of the signage is consistent with the applicable requirements in the Code and in the guidelines. She noted that the City’s Signage Design Guidelines specifically address Market Square and support some level of consistency for awning type and color, and type and location of signage to allow the architectural details of Market Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 27, 2013 - Page 18 Square to be the highlight of the experience. She added that staff recommends a dark green awning consistent with the common theme in the Square and the City guidelines. She stated that the most significant c hange proposed is the projecting or blade sign. She noted that a mock-up of the sign was installed for the Commission to view and commented that the sign is compatible with Market Square and could be a playful, successful component of this request. She recommended that natural materials be used for the signage consistent with the guidelines. She requested Commission input on all aspects of the petition. In response to questions from Commissioner Preschlack, Ms. Neuman stated that there is no photographic evidence that historically projecting signs were used in Market Square but stated that there appears to be evidence on the building that there may have been some type of signage on this corner piece at some time in the past. She stated that this storefront could be viewed as unique given the corner location and arched architectural elements. She added that the signage could help to balance the signage across the Square on the opposing corner space. She stated that the Square is architecturally balanced, but not symmetrical. She stated that there may be some merit in considering a unique feature in this location. In response to questions from Commissioner Athenson, Ms. Neuman confirmed that typically, signage is limited to two colors. She acknowledged that seven colors as proposed is a significant departure. Commissioner Athenson observed that most awnings in Market Square are dark green or green and white striped. She added that most awnings are retracted much of the time to allow light into the spaces or to prevent damage from the wind. She asked that consideration be given to a retractable awning. Commissioner Swenson commended the business stating that it will be a fabulous addition to Market Square. She asked for and received confirmation that the trim color is consistent with the rest of Market Square. She suggested that providing the name of the business on the east facing window may give more name recognition to the business. In response to comments from Commissioner Swenson, Mr. Ruggles stated that he asked the owner about adding the business name to the east facing window but learned that since the business does not yet have name recognition, there is interest in providing information on the product offered. He noted that the window displays will not be visible from the train station or to those entering Market Square. He added that the projecting sign will be visible from the east. He stated that for the business owner, the projecting sign is the first priority; the transom signs the second priority and the lettering on the glass, third. Commissioner Preschlack commented that the signage is well done and effective. He noted however that as a Commission, there needs to be concern about the Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 27, 2013 - Page 19 precedent that may be set. He noted that there are other corner spaces in the Square and other unique situations. He asked what would prevent other businesses from requesting excessive signage, projecting signs and multiple colors. He questioned whether the character of the Square would change if five or six of these types of requests were approved. He noted that the Square is charming and noted that people find the businesses. He asked for more discussion around the question of establishing a precedent and changing the character of the Square. Chairman Pairitz commented that he is less concerned about the projecting sign than the colors. He noted that projecting signs are used on Bank Lane and work well but noted that they are subtle, with one or two colors. He observed that due to the arched windows, no awnings are proposed at the corner which is a good thing. He stated that as a result, the projecting sign would not compete with an awning as it would in other locations on the Square. He stated that for him, accepting the multiple colors is more difficult. He stated that seeing requests for multiple colors for signs throughout the Square could be concerning. He noted that the City has gone to great lengths to keep the signage distraction down and stated his appreciation of that goal. He stated that looking forward, there needs to continue to be restraint or the character of the business district will change. In response to questions from Commissioner Preschlack, Ms. Neuman agreed that if this request is approved, there will be other requests for additional signage and multiple colors. She noted however that in many cases, businesses respect and are satisfied with the signage permitted by the design guidelines. She stated that in the cases where more is requested, the matter is brought before the Commission to look carefully at the request to determine whether more is warranted. She added that if something more is approved, the findings of the Commission should detail the basis for the decision and the uniqueness of the situation. In response to further questions from Commissioner Preschlack, Ms. Czerniak emphasized that the Commission can support signage that goes beyond what is permitted outright but should do so based on clear findings. Commissioner Athenson stated that the Commission in the past has discussed that the intent of signs in the business district is to identify businesses, not to advertise. She stated that excessive signage is advertising. In response to comments from the Commission, Mr. Ruggles stated that the intent of the proposed signage is to identify the new business and the product being offered. He stated that the space is unique due to the corner location noting that the full frontage is not seen all at one time. He confirmed that there is evidence that there was a sign at the corner in the past. He noted that the façades in Market Square have gone through various changes over the years and the owners’ intention is to further enhance the Square. He commented on the colors noting that four primary colors are proposed and the other colors are muted and bl end Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 27, 2013 - Page 20 with the surroundings. The Commission generally discussed the concept of setting a precedent for signage that exceeds what is permitted. Commissioner Travers noted concerns about the congestion that may be caused by outdoor tables on the east side of the building. He noted the various elements located in that area including planters and trash cans and commented that the tables may impede access to the doorways. He added that there are office windows above the proposed location of the table and noise could impact the offices. He suggested that the proposed tables should be modeled on the site to determine how much space will be taken up. He noted that the tables and chairs will not remain in one place Commissioner Preschlack commented that the business owner will likely monitor the outdoor tables because she will want that area to be a pleasant experience for the customers. He stated that the tables and chairs can be reduced in number or moved if problems come up. In response to questions from Commissioner Ransom, Ms. Neuman explained that outdoor dining is permitted with a requirement for a minimum of 5’ clearance on the sidewalk for pedestrians. She stated that the table layout presented to the Commission is conceptual noting that on site review would occur. In response to questions from Chairman Pairitz, Mr. Ruggles confirmed that the plan presented showing the outdoor tables is to scale. He stated that after the business owner, the landlord is the next line of defense if there are issues that affect other tenants. He added that the tables will not be in front of the entrance doors. The Commission discussed the clearances between the proposed tables and the other amenities in the square. In response to questions from Commissioner Travers, Ms. Neuman stated that part of the standard procedure is to review plans for outdoor tables to confirm that the required clearances are provided. She stated that ongoing monitoring occurs and as necessary, City staff works with business owners or landlords to address issues. She confirmed if there are ongoing problems the City may require removal of the outdoor tables or issue a citation. Chairman Pairitz stated that physically, the outdoor seating area may work but he acknowledged that the Commission has received feedback in the past about too many amenities in Market Square. In response to questions from Chairman Pairitz, Ms. Neuman reviewed that a single type of signage is encouraged but noted that the design guidelines allow for Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 27, 2013 - Page 21 flexibility in signage types if approved by the Commission. She confirmed that the signage as proposed exceeds the maximum allowable square footage, 25 square feet. She stated that she does not know the percent of the overage as currently proposed. Chairman Pairitz stated that it would be helpful to know the amount by which the signage exceeds the permitted square footage. In response to questions from Commissioner Preschlack, Ms. Neuman stated that from the staff perspective, a projecting sign at this location may be acceptable. Commissioner Athenson noted that in her opinion, the projecting sign seem s to disrupt the consistency of the Square. She acknowledged that projecting signs are used on Bank Lane but noted that on that street, projecting signs serve the function of identifying the spaces given the small storefronts and narrow street. She noted the large store front for this space. She stated support for some distinction for individual businesses, but to a limited extent. Commissioner Swenson noted that most business signs do not have a graphic as part of the sign. In response to questions from Commissioner Preschlack, Ms. Neuman stated that the stone arches framing the storefront windows and the sidewalk wrapping around two sides of the store frontage are unique elements of this space. She noted that finding a balance between the large signage that exists on the sou th side of the Square and this space is appropriate. Commissioner Moyer stated agreement with Commissioner Athenson that projecting signs make sense on Bank Lane. He stated that based on the photo of the mock-up of the projecting sign, it appears to have some awkwardness. He suggested that consideration be given to placing the sign in the same plane as the wall and positioning it within the window area, centered with the arch. He further stated that the design of the arch in the tower did not anticipate the placement of a sign next to it and does not allow it to be successfully accomplished. He added that some modification to the colors, incorporating green around the perimeter, would help to reflect the character of Market Square but would not overcome other objectionable features. He stated that the sign should be reserved and conservative consistent with other projecting signs on Bank Lane. He stated that the precedent issue is a concern. He stated support for the outdoor tables, chairs and activity. He stated that the awning is a more tasteful deviation than some previously presented in other petitions however, he stated support for a dark green color consistent with others in the Square. He stated that a contemporary frame for the awning is not appropriate. In response to questions from Commissioner Ransom, Mr. Ruggles stated that the Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 27, 2013 - Page 22 plastic lettering is preferred by the owner. Chairman Pairitz invited public comment. Hearing none, he invited final comments from the Commission. Commissioner Preschlack summarized that there are many opportunities to differentiate this business. He stated support for the darker green or green and white stripe awning and consideration of a retractable awning. Commissioners Athenson and Ransom agreed with Commissioner Preschlack. Chairman Pairitz stated that plastic looking signage is discouraged. He stated the painted wood look should be achieved for consistency with other signs in the Central Business District. He stated that “the bar” is higher in Market Square and he agreed with Commissioner Moyer that where deviation from the standards has been permitted, it has been disappointing. He stated that given the corner location and stated his inclination to allow a bit more signage at this location. Commissioner Athenson suggested that the menu items could be removed to clean up the look. Commissioner Ransom stated support for the concept of the descriptive w ords. He stated that other than the projecting sign, he is generally comfortable what is presented. In response to questions from the Commission, Ms. Neuman stated that the Code permits up to three descriptive words. Commissioner Moyer stated support for the descriptive words. In response to questions from Commissioner Preschlack, Ms. Fellows stated that her intent is to be consistent with Market Square and Shaw’s approach. She stated that the there is a charm to the hanging bracket. She noted that Williams Sonoma has signage that goes beyond the sign guidelines. Commissioner Ransom stated appreciation for the petitioner’s comments but noted concern about deviating too far from the signage guidelines. Commissioner Pairitz noted that Market Square has its own place in the signage guidelines. He offered that the landlord could make a comprehensive case for alternative signage for the Square. He stated that the presentation would need to document that the signage would not diminish the character of the Square but could identify particular locations that might warrant some distinction. He stated general support for a single image, not a wall of information. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 27, 2013 - Page 23 Commissioner Ransom noted concern about setting a precedent that cannot be substantiated. In response to questions from Chairman Pairitz, Mr. Ruggles stated that the first choice for lettering is acrylic letters to avoid the need for re-painting. He suggested that discussion of the projecting sign be postponed and the other aspects of the proposal approved. He asked that rather than deny any component of the project, the Commission allow the petitioner more time for study. Commissioner Preschlack suggested that the projecting sign be reconsidered to make it more compatible with Market Square. He reiterated that a sign of this type will set a precedent. Commissioner Ransom stated that he would not likely be able to approve a projecting sign in this location due to the precedent that would be set. He stated that a dark green or green and white stripe awning should be used along with painted wood letters. He stated that the window signage is acceptable. Commissioner Athenson stated that she is not supportive of a projecting sign because it is too much of a departure from Market Square. She noted that the existing temporary signage in the window is highly visible and could be a model for a sign location. Chairman Pairitz reviewed the precedent issue in response to questions and comments from Mr. Ruggles. He invited a motion. Commissioner Ransom made a motion to continue the petition to allow further study and refinement based on the Commission’s comments. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Preschlack and it was unanimously approved by the Commission. 7. Consideration of a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for updated City of Lake Forest entrance signs to replace existing signs at various locations near the City limits. Owner: The City of Lake Forest Representatives: Diana Melichar, Melichar Architects Guy Berg, Melichar Architects Chairman Pairitz asked the Commission for any conflicts of interest or Ex Parte contacts. Hearing none, he invited a presentation from Ms. Melichar. Ms. Melichar summarized the evolution of the design process for the new entrance sign proposed. She noted that her firm was hired by the City to examine and evaluate the City’s existing entrance signs. She explained that this Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 27, 2013 - Page 24 study was undertaken in an effort to better communicate the City’s true character as a unique community. She reviewed the areas evaluated and researched on the City’s behalf in an effort to improve upon the current signage. She stated that they considered effectiveness in expressing community character, the aesthetics of the sign with attention to the psychological effects of the sign design configuration, the graphic quality of the logo, the legibility of the text, lettering font and format, and the overall size, shape and height of the sign. She stated that the study included reviewing existing and h istoric precedents in Lake Forest and in surrounding communities. She provided images of stylistic references in Lake Forest and noted that looking at the existing entrance signs in the context of the rest of the community, the existing signs appear detached from the exceptional design standards found elsewhere in the community. She stated that the existing signs lack character and appear anonymous fading into the background. She noted that given the round shape and dimensions of the entrance signs, they appear similar to many traffic signs. She stated that the signs are too low, competing with and overlapping with the traffic signs and as a result, they are lost. She noted that the black metal posts lessen the impact of the signs and contrast with other historic images in the community such as the gas lights. She reviewed a range of signs in the community noting in particular three signs that are elegant and compatible with the community: Elawa Farm, the Onwentsia Club and the Knollwood Club. She observed that these signs are comfortable and familiar to the residents and provide a sense of history. She noted that recent commercial signs are set at lower heights and have a double post or monument base. She noted that due to the bulk and mass of those types of signs, the openness and freedom of passage is compromised and the signs are less elegant. She stated that a survey of entrance signs for other North Shore communities was completed noting that some signs made little reference to the community’s legacy and appeared generic. She noted that Glencoe’s entrance sign was more traditional and had a charm and pedigree. She stated that based on the survey, it was observed that black on white signs are most visible and present a clean and crisp image of the community. She discussed the various heights of signs reviewing an example of a post sign with a very high arm noting that the configuration was intimidating and discouraged entrance into a private development. She presented the proposed new entrance sign design explaining that a single, vertical post with a horizontal arm is proposed to convey the quality and elegance of the community. She noted that the sign references the sign for Lake Forest High School designed by Stanley Anderson in terms of the sign shape and the letter font. She stated that other fonts were considered in depth but noted that other styles were rejected as being too generic or more appropriate for printed materials. She stated that the sign board shape is distinctive and eye catching. She stated that the shape references elements of Market Square. She noted the intent to strengthen the image of the City logo with hand lettered etching commenting that the current multi-color format is trendy. She referred back to the Glencoe sign noting again the strength of the monochromatic technique. She noted that a medium size sign board is proposed at a 10’6” arm Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 27, 2013 - Page 25 height noting that the sign will be taller and larger than most traffic signs, but welcoming. She showed images of the proposed sign in the context of street conditions. She reviewed a detailed drawing of the sign and described the detailing of the post, hanger and sign noting that the sign will hang free, able to move in the wind, but will be sturdy. She stated that an appropriate species of wood will be selected for durability and ease of maintenance. She displayed a full size foam core mock-up of the sign that was made as part of the study process to allow a better understanding of the design and size in the context of the entrance locations. She presented a map showing the existing entrance sign locations commenting on the diversity of the locations with some along tree-lined streets and another near a Tollway interchange. She stated that a single sign design is proposed and was selected to be successful at the various locations. She identified three priority locations for the first phase of installations, at the north end of Green Bay Road, at Old Elm Road near Route 41 and along Route 60 near the Tollway. She explained that over time, all of the exis ting signs will be replaced making the City entrance sign the most prevalent sign type in the community. She provided comparison photos of the existing and proposed sign at various entrance locations. She concluded by noting that low lying ground cover should support the entrance signs to avoid diminishing the height of the pole and to avoid distracting attention away from the signs with bright colored plantings. Ms. Czerniak thanked the City’s consultants. She noted that the staff report included recommended conditions of approval. She noted that in the City Charter, the City is officially referred to as “The City of Lake Forest” but there is no legal obligation to include “The” on the sign. She commented that the consultants recommend that from a design perspective, “The” not be included on the sign. She asked for Commission input on this question. Commissioner Ransom summarized the matter noting that the question is to “the” or not to “the”. In response to questions from Chairman Pairitz, Ms. Melichar discussed the bracket acknowledging that after study, the lettering was thickened and the bracket refined. In response to questions from Commissioner Preschlack, Ms. Melichar confirmed that attention will be paid to mounting the sign securely. In response to a question from Commissioner Athenson, Ms. Melichar stated that the back of the sign will be blank. In response to questions from Commissioner Travers, Ms. Melichar stated that the tree graphic will be incised in the wood. She stated that having the City graphic is important to create a unique identity. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 27, 2013 - Page 26 Chairman Pairitz invited public comment, hearing none, he commented that the sign is very well done and a credit to the study, careful design development and presentation. He invited a motion from the Commission. Commissioner Athenson made a motion to grant a Certificate of Appropriateness based on the findings in the staff report and subject to the following conditions of approval. 1. The text on the signs shall not include “The”. 2. The consultant should develop siting guidelines for the entrance signs and assist in the site selection. 3. Consideration shall be given to an alternatively sized sign for locations with different characteristics. 4. The signs shall be constructed of high quality, natural material. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Preschlack and was unanimously by the Commission. OTHER ITEMS 8. Opportunity for the public to address the Historic Preservation Commission on non- agenda items. There were no additional public comments. 9. Additional information from staff. There was no additional information presented by staff. The meeting was adjourned at 11:03 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Catherine J. Czerniak Director of Community Development