HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 2017/07/26 MinutesThe City of Lake Forest
Historic Preservation Commission
Proceedings of the July 26, 2017 Meeting
A regular meeting of the Lake Forest Historic Preservation Commission was held on
Wednesday, July 26, 2017, at 6:30 p.m., at the City of Lake Forest City Hall, 220 E.
Deerpath, Lake Forest, Illinois.
Historic Preservation Commissioners present: Chairman Grieve and Commissioners
Wells Wheeler, Elizabeth Sperry, Jan Gibson, Robert Alfe, Carol Gayle and Bill Redfield.
Commissioners absent: none
City staff present: Catherine Czerniak, Director of Community Development and Kate
McManus, Assistant Planner
1. Introduction of Commissioners and staff, overview of meeting procedures.
Chairman Grieve reviewed the meeting procedures followed by the Commission and
asked the members of the Commission and staff to introduce themselves.
2. Consideration of the minutes of the June 28, 2017 meeting of the Historic
Preservation Commission.
The minutes of the June 28, 2017 meeting were approved as submitted.
3. Consideration of a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for updates to the
Signage Guidelines for Market Square.
Property Owners: L3 Capital, LLC (Michael Schreiber, Domenic Lanni, Timothy Phair,
Greg Schott)
Representative: OKW Architects, Michael Fitzgerald, architect
Chairman Grieve asked the Commission for any conflicts of interest or Ex Parte
contacts; hearing none, he invited a presentation from the petitioner.
Mr. Fitzgerald introduced the petition noting that his firm has been involved with
numerous projects in Market Square over the years including restoration work and some
new construction. He reviewed that his firm has worked on developing a proposal for
updates to the current signage and awning restrictions and guidelines and has been
before the Commission several times for discussion and direction. He stated
appreciation for the Preservation Foundation’s comments and input into the process.
He noted that at the beginning of the year, the Commission took a walking tour to
observe and discuss the variety, number and types of signage currently located in
Market Square. He stated that a mockup of the proposed blade sign was installed for
the Commission. He noted that there is not a single architectural style in Market Square
and a variety of signage types as well. He added that the blade sign is proposed as a
new type of sign for Market Square and the north and south alleys. He noted that
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
July 26, 2017 - Page 2
blade signs are already in use on Bank Lane. He stated that a single bracket type and
sign type are proposed for the blade sign pointing out that both elements have
restrained detail. He stated that as proposed, font is not restricted but other aspects
such as size, color, and placement are restricted. He stated that the mockup features
the Kiddles font. He stated that as proposed, a maximum of 3 types of signs are
permitted for each storefront however, the choice of sign types is limited by the unique
details of each store front. He noted that the proposed updates to the Market Square
signage guidelines adhere generally to the existing guidelines, but offer more options to
tenants within certain parameters. He stated that the owner of Market Square has
previously stated his preference to move away from awnings in Market Square, but
noted that parameters for awnings are included in the updated guidelines recognized
that some tenants may have a functional need or a desire for awnings.
Ms. McManus reviewed the Commission’s discussion to date about updates to the
guidelines for signage and awnings in Market Square. She stated that the updated
guidelines were first presented to the Commission early in 2017 and noted that the
Commission took a walking tour February to look at existing signage and awnings in
Market Square and to view mock ups of proposed signage types. She stated that the
proposed updates are intended to add more options for signage, while adhering to the
permitted square footage for signage in the Code. She stated that Commission
previously raised concern that the new guidelines may result in too many signs, or too
many different types of signs. She reiterated that the total square footage permitted for
signage for an individual business will not change. She stated that the staff report
outlines proposed changes and recommendations for the Commission’s consideration.
In response to a question from Commissioner Alfe, Mr. Fitzgerald clarified that projecting
signs or blade signs are proposed only in certain locations and not at locations
adjacent to an awning. He stated that the maximum number of locations where
projecting signs could be located based on the parameters proposed is quite limited.
He pointed out the vertical pier, on either side of the recessed entry, where a projecting
sign could be attached. He stated that projecting signs will be limited to the approved
locations. He stated that each vertical pier is approximately 4 feet away from an
existing or potential awning. He explained that a projecting sign, as proposed, could
not be uses in combination with an awning, but could be permitted on a storefront next
to a storefront with an awning. He agreed that a projecting sign may have limited
visibility if located next to a storefront that has an awning.
In response to a question from Commissioner Alfe, Ms. McManus stated that staff
recommends that the projecting sign be constructed of natural materials, consistent
with the City’s design guidelines. She stated that if desired, the Commission can add a
condition requiring that all awnings have a consistent pitch.
In response to a question from Commissioner Sperry, Ms. McManus stated that based on
previous input from the Commission, staff recommends that the bracket number 3 be
eliminated. She added that previously, the Commission raised concern about the low
angle of the bracket. She added that the other 3 bracket options offer some variety.
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
July 26, 2017 - Page 3
In response to a question from Commissioner Gibson, Mr. Fitzgerald stated that the
bracket and awnings will be custom fabricated noting that the bracket is proposed as
painted steel.
In response to a question from Commissioner Wheeler, Mr. Fitzgerald explained that the
design and shape of the projecting sign does not mimic an existing detail found in
Market Square, but is influenced by Shaw’s design and historic influences of other
projecting signs. He stated that the bracket design is similar the detail on the awning at
the candy shop in Market Square. He noted that historic photos indicate that awnings
were used very early on in the Square despite the fact that there were not part of
Shaw’s original design. He stated that those the earlier awnings were much larger and
often dark colored or striped, with closed sides.
Commissioner Sperry pointed out that some of the historic photos provided reflect the
use of awnings.
In response to a question from Commissioner Wheeler, Mr. Fitzgerald stated that the
scrollwork on the wall signs was influenced by a wall sign designed by Shaw that still
remains today. He stated that although 4 wall signs are proposed, two of the signs, 1B
and 2a, would be permitted only in very limited locations.
In response to questions from Commissioner Alfe, Mr. Fitzgerald stated that the existing
non-conforming awnings will remain until the awning requires replacement or until a
tenant changes. He reiterated that the owner intends to work with tenants to
encourage eliminating awnings over time to better highlight the architectural details of
the building. He noted that to his knowledge, tenants are not as interested in having
awnings as they are in having options for other types of signage. He stated that tenants
on the south side of the Square, do not need awnings for functional purposes. He
noted however that storefronts on the north side of the Square are impacted by the
sun. He pointed out that Shaw designed small slate roofs over some of the storefronts
noting that the roofs limit the signage options for those storefronts.
In response to a question from Commissioner Gibson, Mr. Fitzgerald confirmed that the
Fleur-de-lis element on the bracket for the projecting sign is not used in other areas of
Market Square. He noted however that Shaw was influenced by many styles of
architecture and stated that in his opinion, use of the element is not inappropriate for
Market Square.
In response to a question from Commissioner Gayle, Mr. Fitzgerald stated that a single
bracket option is proposed for the North Gate building to achieve a consistent
appearance across the façade. He acknowledged that the proposed bracket results in
the awnings having a different pitch than awnings elsewhere in Market Square. He
agreed that the bracket option could be eliminated if so directed by the Commission.
He stated that the design team discussed, at length whether to establish restrictions on
fonts. He stated that as presented, no restrictions on the type of font is are proposed.
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
July 26, 2017 - Page 4
He explained that instead, other tools will be used to ensure a sense of consistency such
as limitations on letter size and sign colors.
Commissioner Sperry noted that sometimes businesses are obligated to use a corporate
type style.
Commissioner Gayle stated that she appreciates the thoughtful consideration given to
whether or not to restrict fonts but noted that she still has some reservations about
allowing any font noting particular concern with the highly stylized font as proposed by
My Eye Doctor.
Commissioner Redfield commented that in his opinion, font should not be restricted.
In response to questions from Chairman Grieve, Mr. Fitzgerald stated that it has not yet
been determined whether the manufacturing of the projecting signs will be handled by
a single contractor, selected by the owner. He stated that in the past, tenants have
been responsible for their own signage, with some guidance from the owner.
Ms. Czerniak stated that before the City issues a permit for any sign in Market Square,
the property owner, L3 Capital, will need to review the signage for consistency with the
approved regulations and will need to sign the permit application. She noted City staff
would then review the proposed signage for consistency with the applicable Code
requirements. She added that if the proposed sign is not consistent with the applicable
Code provisions and guidelines, it would be presented to the Commission for review.
Chairman Grieve acknowledged that change occurs over time, even in Market Square.
He noted however that it is important to manage change within a reasonable degree.
He stated that it is appropriate that there are different options now for signage than
there were historically. He stated that proper maintenance of signage and storefronts
should be a priority on an ongoing basis noting that the condition of Market Square is as
important as the types of signage.
Hearing no further questions from the Commission, Chairman Grieve invited public
comment.
Laura Luce, 111 Ridge Lane, representative of the Preservation Foundation, stated that
the Foundation is in agreement with staff’s recommendations with the exception of the
recommendation pertaining to font. She stated that Foundation recommends that font
should be regulated or limited in some way.
Hearing no further public testimony, he invited final comments from the Board.
Commissioner Sperry pointed out that the letter submitted by the Foundation expressed
concern about any additional holes being drilled into the original columns of the former
Marshall Field’s building. She recommended that to prevent any future damage to the
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
July 26, 2017 - Page 5
columns, a condition be added that no additional signage may be affixed to the
columns.
At the request of the Commission, Ms. McManus reviewed the recommendations in the
staff report regarding awnings. She stated that staff recommends that operable
awnings, rather than fixed, be required to allow awnings to be retracted when not in
use to expose the architectural details of the buildings. Based on the Commission’s
discussion, she also recommended that bracket 3 be eliminated.
In response to a question from Commissioner Alfe, Ms. McManus stated that the current
guidelines intends for awnings to be functional and not just used for signage. She
reiterated that operable awnings will allow awnings to be retracted when not in use.
In response to questions from the Commission, Mr. Fitzgerald stated that they
researched retractable awnings and did not find a product that was of a quality
appropriate for Market Square. He stated that further exploration can be done but
noted that the owners do not want to compromise the overall quality and character of
the Square with inappropriate awnings.
Chairman Grieve offered that placing some limitations on awnings may deter tenants
from installing awnings.
Commissioner Wheeler noted that awnings are perceived as an architectural element
and retracted awnings can look messy.
In response to a question from Commissioner Gayle, Ms. Czerniak stated that normally,
when guidelines or regulations change, existing conditions are recognized as a
grandfathered condition. She stated that any new awnings would be required to
comply with the updated guidelines.
Commissioner Redfield pointed out that there is a disadvantage to fixed awnings in
strong winds. He noted that not having the ability to retract an awning in bad weather
could be problematic.
Commissioner Sperry stated that historic documentation shows that awnings were part
of the architecture of Market Square. She stated that removing awnings could make
the Square appear cold. She added that awnings are useful in inclement weather.
Chairman Grieve suggested that the approval be conditioned upon any awnings
being of high quality and subject to the approval of the property owner.
In response to questions from the Commission, Mr. Fitzgerald stated that the guidelines
specify the awning canvas, bracket and valance. He agreed with the Commission’s
desire to eliminate bracket 3. He suggested that bracket 1 be used on the North Gate
building in place of bracket 3. He stated that the idea behind the different types of
brackets is to recognize the Marshall Field’s building as the most formal building with a
consistent awning and bracket on all bays. He stated that the North Gate building is
also somewhat formal and as a result, a single consistent bracket and awning is
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
July 26, 2017 - Page 6
appropriate for that building as well. He noted that the Square is less formal and more
opportunity for variety is appropriate.
In response to a question from Commissioner Gibson, Mr. Fitzgerald confirmed that the
intent is to allow tenants to select from the approved bracket options.
Ms. McManus reviewed the recommendations in the staff report regarding projecting
signs including the recommendation that projecting signs be limited to text only, no
graphics; two colors, green and white; and natural materials.
Commissioner Gibson stated support for limiting the options for fonts.
Commissioner Sperry stated that the font for My Eye Doctor was likely mandated by the
corporate office. She questioned how the Commission can strike the right balance.
Chairman Grieve presented an historic image of the signage for Walgreens noting the
stylized font. He agreed that it is important to strike the right balance between
accommodating businesses and maintaining some consistency. He pointed out that
overall fonts have not been a source of concern with a few exceptions.
Commissioner Gayle reiterated that in the case of My Eye Doctor, the font presented
was inconsistent with the other fonts found in Market Square .
Commissioner Wheeler stated that it is not feasible or desirable to establish a single
permissible font.
In response to a question from Commissioner Gibson, Commissioner Alfe clarified that
the design of the walls signs should be fixed to assure appropriate proportions.
In response to a question from Commissioner Alfe, Ms. McManus confirmed that no
change is proposed to the allowable size for graphics.
Chairman Grieve summarized that it appears that the Commission is in agreement that
all specialty signs will come to the Commission for review and with staff’s
recommendations on the wall signs.
In response to a question from Commissioner Gibson, Mr. Fitzgerald stated that the
brackets are proposed as painted vs, anodized metal. He added that although painted
steel requires maintenance, it has a richer deeper color than anodized metal which is
generally aluminum.
Hearing no further comments from the Commission, Chairman Grieve invited a motion.
Commissioner Wheeler made a motion to grant a Certificate of Appropriateness approving
updates to the Signage Guidelines for Market Square. He noted that the approval is subject to
the following conditions of approval:
Conditions of Approval
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
July 26, 2017 - Page 7
Awnings
1. Bracket 3 shall be eliminated and replaced with Bracket 1 for awnings on the No rth Gate
building.
2. All awnings shall have a consistent pitch; the pitch shall be determined by the owners
and design team.
3. Awnings, in general, are discouraged in order to showcase store fronts and architectural
details.
Projecting Signs
4. Projecting signs are limited to text only, no graphics.
5. Projecting signs are limited to a combination of green and white consistent with the
specific colors used through Market Square.
6. Natural materials should be used for projecting signs.
Wall Signs
7. Specialty wall signs, options 1B and 2B, require Commission review.
8. Graphics should be limited to 15% of the total sign area consistent with the Code.
Specialty Signs
9. Specialty signs require Commission review.
10. No signage, drilling, penetrations or application of materials is permitted on the
columns of the Marshall Field’s building.
Window Signs
11. The proposed allowance for a graphic, image or symbol on storefront doors shall
not exceed 15% of the total door or window sign area.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Alfe and passed by a vote of 7 – 0.
OTHER ITEMS
4. Opportunity for the public to address the Historic Preservation Commission on non-
agenda items.
There was no public testimony presented to the Commission on non-agenda items.
5. Additional information from staff.
Ms. McManus noted that the Historic Preservation, in conjunction with the Building
Review Board, will hold a bus tour on Monday, July 31st.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:53 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Kate McManus
Assistant Planner