PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE 2020/07/08 PacketPUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING
WEDNESDAY, JULY 8, 2020 – 2:00 P.M.
REMOTE ACCESS MEETING
AGENDA
Please be advised that all of the Public Works Committee members will be remotely attending
this Public Works Committee meeting by electronic means, in compliance with Governor’s
Executive Order 2020-07, issued on March 16, 2020, that suspended certain Open Meetings Act
provisions relating to in-person attendance by members of a public body. Specifically, the
Governor’s Order: (1) suspends the requirement in Section 2.01 that “members of a public body
must be physically present;” and (2) suspends the limitations in Section 7 on when remote
participation is allowed. This Executive Order is effective the duration of the Gubernatorial
Disaster proclamation. In accordance with state statute, Chairman Buschmann has made a
determination that it was not practical or prudent to schedule an in-person Public Works
Committee meeting because of the COVID-19 pandemic, so this meeting is being held
remotely.
The City will be providing members of the public with various opportunities to watch or
participate in this meeting. For example, members of the public can participate remotely in the
meeting by following the public audience link and password:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85411818195?pwd=MlhhV1NUbVlIN3lVemZBMG1MSXBkdz09
Password: 1861
ROLL CALL/CALL TO ORDER
Raymond Buschmann, Chairman
Ted Notz
Jim Preschlack
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
I.CODE UPDATE REGARDING SUMP PUMP & DOWNSPOUT DISCHARGE AS IT
RELATES TO PROPERTY LINES AND PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY – CATHY CZERNIAK
II.NOTIFICATION OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST'S REQUIRED IEPA STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PLAN (“SMPP”) – JIM LOCKEFEER
III.PUBLIC WORKS CIP PROJECT STATUS UPDATES – DAN MARTIN, BOB ELLS,
MICHAEL THOMAS
ACTION ITEMS
IV.APPROVAL OF THE MAY 26, 2020 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
V.REVIEW AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL THE FY21 LONG LINE
STRIPING PROGRAM – DAN MARTIN
PUBLIC COMMENT
NEXT MEETING – SEPTEMBER 23, 2020
ADJOURNMENT
INFORMATIONAL ITEM:
CODE UPDATE REGARDING SUMP
PUMP & DOWNSPOUT DISCHARGE
AS IT RELATES TO PROPERTY LINES
AND PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
CODE UPDATE SECTION 150.391 -STORM SEWER AND SURFACE DRAINAGE
INFORMATION ONLY –REVIEW OF PREVIOUS COMMITTEE DISCUSSION
•Purpose –Update, clarify, add specificity
•Key issues addressed
o Eliminate requirement for connection to a public storm sewer.
o Specify permitted locations for sump pump, down spouts and storm sewer discharge.
o Mitigate discharge close to property lines, public rights-of way (sidewalks and streets).
o Update permitted materials.
o Require City approval for connection to road drains.
INFORMATIONAL ITEM:
NOTIFICATION OF THE CITY OF
LAKE FOREST'S REQUIRED IEPA
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM PLAN (“SMPP”)
NOTIFICATION OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST'S REQUIRED IEPA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
----INFORMATION ONLY ----
What is a SMPP?
•Existing procedures and practices that are implemented by a municipality that reduce the discharge of
pollutants within stormwater runoff
What is the purpose of a SMPP?
•To meet the minimum standards required by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)
under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program
Why does Lake Forest need a SMPP?
•Federal regulations through the USEPA require that all Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s),
located partially or fully in urbanized areas, obtain stormwater permits for their discharges into receiving
waters
What information can be found within the SMPP?
•Outreach efforts
•Education efforts
•City Stormwater Management Policy
•City operations
NOTIFICATION OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST'S REQUIRED IEPA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
----INFORMATION ONLY ----
How did City Staff develop the City’s SMPP
•Using a SMPP template provided by the Lake County SMC
•Help via a consultant with prior career experience with the IEPA and USEPA
Where is the City’s SMPP located?
•Located on the City’s website on the Flooding and Stormwater Management webpage
City OF Lake Forest
LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS
February 2018
STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM PLAN
SMPP
___________________________________
Prepared by
JAS Environmental, Inc.
PO Box 374
Hebron, IL 60034
Phone 847-409-7687
www.jasenviro.com
Prepared with the assistance of
and based on a SMPP template provided by:
The Lake County Stormwater Management Commission
333 Peterson Road
Libertyville, IL 60048
Phone 847-918-5260 • Fax 847-918-9826
1
STORMWATER MANAGMENT PROGRAM PLAN
CITY OF LAKE FOREST, ILLINOIS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 OVERVIEW OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PLAN .............. 8
1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 8
1.2 Water Quality Standards .................................................................................................. 9
1.2.1 Designated Uses ...................................................................................................... 9
1.2.2 Water Quality Criteria ............................................................................................. 9
1.2.3 Monitoring ............................................................................................................... 9
1.2.4 Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) ..................................................................... 9
1.3 Watershed, Sub-watersheds and Receiving Waters....................................................... 10
1.3.1 Watershed Descriptions ......................................................................................... 10
1.3.1.1 North Branch of the Chicago River Watershed ................................................ 10
1.3.1.2 Lake Michigan Watershed ................................................................................ 13
1.3.1.3 Des Plaines River Watershed ........................................................................... 14
1.3.2 Identifying Outfalls (BMP C.1) ............................................................................. 15
1.4 Status of Waters ............................................................................................................. 17
1.5 Countywide Approach to NPDES Compliance ............................................................. 19
2.0 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ......................................................................................... 21
2.1 Implementation of this SMPP ....................................................................................... 21
2.2 Intra -Department Coordination ..................................................................................... 21
2.2.1 Stormwater Coordinator ........................................................................................ 21
2.2.2 Engineering Department ........................................................................................ 23
2.2.3 Public Works Department ..................................................................................... 23
2.3 Coordination with Lake County Stormwater Management Commission ...................... 23
2.4 Coordination with Consultants ...................................................................................... 23
2.5 Coordination of Contractors .......................................................................................... 23
2.6 Coordination with the Public ......................................................................................... 24
2.7 Coordination with the IEPA .......................................................................................... 24
2.8 Coordination with the Development Community ......................................................... 24
3.0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM – THE QUALIFYING LOCAL
PROGRAM ................................................................................................................................... 25
3.1 Public Education ............................................................................................................ 25
3.1.1. Distributed Paper Materials (BMP-A.1) ................................................................ 26
3.1.2 Speaking Engagement (BMP-A.2) ........................................................................ 26
3.1.3 Public Service Announcement (BMP-A.3) ........................................................... 27
2
3.1.4 Outreach Events (BMP-A.4) ................................................................................. 27
3.1.5 Classroom Educational Material (BMP-A.5) ........................................................ 27
3.1.6 Other Public Educational - Website (BMP-A.6) ................................................... 28
3.2 Public Outreach ............................................................................................................. 28
3.2.1 Public Panel (BMP-B.1) ........................................................................................ 28
3.2.2 Stakeholder Meeting (BMP-B.3) ........................................................................... 29
3.2.3 Program Involvement (BMP-B.6) ......................................................................... 29
3.3 Illicit Discharge Program .............................................................................................. 29
3.3.1 Regulatory Control Program (BMP-C.2) .............................................................. 30
3.3.2 Other Illicit Discharge Controls (BMP C.10) ........................................................ 30
3.4 Construction Site Runoff Control .................................................................................. 30
3.4.1 Regulatory Control Program (BMP D.1) .............................................................. 31
3.4.2 Erosion and Sediment Control BMPs (BMP D.2) ................................................. 31
3.4.3 Other Waste Control Programs (BMP D.3) ........................................................... 32
3.4.4 Site Plan Review Procedures (BMP D.4, E.4)....................................................... 32
3.4.5 Site Inspection/Enforcement Procedures (BMP D.6, E.5) .................................... 33
3.4.6 Public Information Handling Procedures (BMP D.5) ........................................... 33
3.4.7 BMP Reference Information ................................................................................. 34
3.5 Post-Construction Runoff Control ................................................................................. 34
3.5.1 Regulatory Control Program (BMP E.2) ............................................................... 34
3.5.2 Long Term O&M (BMP E.3) ................................................................................ 35
3.5.3 Runoff Volume Reduction Hierarchy (BMP E.4) ................................................. 35
3.5.4 Other Post-Construction Runoff Controls (BMP E.7) ........................................... 36
3.6 Pollution Prevention / Good Housekeeping .................................................................. 36
3.6.1 Employee Training Program (BMP F.1) ............................................................... 36
3.6.2 Flood Management / Assess Guidelines (BMP F.5) ............................................. 36
3.6.3 Winter Roadway Deicing (BMP F.6) .................................................................... 37
3.7 Watershed Plans ............................................................................................................ 37
3.7.1 North Branch of the Chicago River Watershed ..................................................... 37
3.7.2 Lake Michigan Watershed ..................................................................................... 37
4.0 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PLAN - CITY OF LAKE FOREST
PROGRAM ................................................................................................................................... 39
4.1 Public Education and Outreach ..................................................................................... 40
4.1.1 Stormwater Management Policy ........................................................................... 41
4.1.2 Distribution of Paper Materials (BMP A.1) .......................................................... 41
4.1.3 Outreach Events (BMP A.4) ................................................................................. 42
4.1.4 Other Public Education - Web Site (BMP A.6) .................................................... 42
3
4.1.5 Other Public Education – City Newsletter (BMP A.6) ......................................... 43
4.1.6 Storm Drain Stenciling & Markers (BMP A.6) .................................................... 43
4.1.7 Household Hazardous Wastes (BMP A.4) ............................................................ 43
4.1.8 Septic System Maintenance (BMP A.6) ............................................................... 44
4.1.9 Vehicle Fluid Maintenance (BMP A.6) ................................................................ 44
4.1.10 Car / Outdoor Washing (BMP A.6) ...................................................................... 45
4.1.11 Lawn and Garden Care (BMP A.6) ...................................................................... 45
4.1.12 Green Infrastructure (BMP A.6) ............................................................................ 45
4.1.13 Pool Dewatering (BMP A.6) ................................................................................. 46
4.2 Public Participation and Involvement............................................................................ 46
4.2.1 Public Review Process (BMP B.1) ........................................................................ 46
4.2.2 Environmental Justice Areas ................................................................................. 47
4.2.3 Complaints, Suggestions and Requests (BMP B.7).............................................. 47
4.3 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination .................................................................. 48
4.3.1 Regulatory Authority (BMP C.2) .......................................................................... 48
4.3.1.1 Watershed Development Ordinance ................................................................. 48
4.3.1.2 Illicit Discharge Ordinance ............................................................................... 49
4.3.1.3 Subdivision and Sediment Grading, Drainage and Erosion Ordinances .......... 49
4.3.2 Understanding Outfalls and Illicit Discharges ....................................................... 49
4.3.2.1 Potential Sources of Illicit Discharges .............................................................. 49
4.3.2.2 Exclusions......................................................................................................... 50
4.3.2.3 Prohibited Discharges ....................................................................................... 50
4.3.3 Indirect Connection Program (BMP C.3) .............................................................. 51
4.3.3.1 Groundwater Seepage ....................................................................................... 51
4.3.3.2 Spills ................................................................................................................. 51
4.3.3.3 Dumping ........................................................................................................... 51
4.3.3.4 Outdoor washing activities ............................................................................... 51
4.3.3.5 Non-target irrigation from landscaping or lawns.............................................. 52
4.3.4 Direct Connection Illicit Discharge Program (BMP C.3 – C.8) ............................ 52
4.3.4.1 Program Planning ............................................................................................. 52
4.3.4.2 Outfall Inspection (BMP C.3) .......................................................................... 53
4.3.4.3 Follow-Up Investigation and Program Evaluation (BMP C.4) ........................ 55
4.3.4.4 Removal of Illicit Discharges (BMP C.5) ........................................................ 56
4.4 Construction Site Runoff Control .................................................................................. 57
4.4.1 Regulatory Program (BMP D.1) ............................................................................ 57
4.4.2 Responsible Parties (BMP D.1) ............................................................................. 58
4
4.4.2.1 Applicant .......................................................................................................... 58
4.4.2.2 DECI – Designated Inspectors ......................................................................... 58
4.4.2.3 Enforcement Officer ......................................................................................... 59
4.4.2.4 Municipal Contact – Stormwater Coordinator ................................................ 59
4.4.3 Erosion and Sediment Control BMPs (BMP D.2) ................................................. 59
4.4.4 Construction Site Waste Control (BMP D.3) ........................................................ 59
4.4.5 Site Plan Review (BMP D.4, E.4) ......................................................................... 59
4.4.6 Site Inspection Procedures (BMP D.6, E.5) .......................................................... 60
4.4.7 Public Information Handling Procedures (BMP D.5) ........................................... 61
4.4.8 Performance Guarantees (BMP D.6) ..................................................................... 61
4.4.9 Violation Notification Procedures (BMP B.6) ...................................................... 61
4.5 Post Construction Runoff Control ................................................................................. 62
4.5.1 Regulatory Program (BMP E.2) ............................................................................ 62
4.5.2 Long Term Operation and Maintenance (BMP E.3) ............................................. 62
4.5.3 Runoff Volume Reduction Hierarchy (BMP E.4) ................................................. 63
4.5.4 Watershed Plans (BMP E.7) .................................................................................. 63
4.5.5 Site Inspections (BMP E.6) .................................................................................. 63
4.5.5.1 Shorelines, Streambanks and Stream Bed Sediment Accumulation................. 63
4.5.5.2 Detention / Retention Pond .............................................................................. 65
4.6 Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping .............................................................. 66
4.6.1 Inspection and Maintenance Program (BMPs F.2 – F.4) ...................................... 66
4.6.1.1 Schedule ........................................................................................................... 66
4.6.1.2 Housekeeping BMPs ............................................................................................ 66
4.6.1.3 Street Sweeping ................................................................................................ 67
4.6.1.4 Drainageways ................................................................................................... 67
4.6.1.5 Landscape Maintenance ................................................................................... 68
4.6.1.6 Snow Removal and Ice Control ........................................................................ 69
4.6.1.7 Vehicle and Equipment Operations .................................................................. 69
4.6.1.8 Animal Nuisance Control ................................................................................. 70
4.6.1.9 Chemical, Oil and Waste Management (BMP F.4) .......................................... 70
4.6.1.11 Water Conservation & Irrigation ................................................................... 71
4.6.1.12 Green Infrastructure ....................................................................................... 71
4.6.1.13 Special Events ............................................................................................... 71
4.6.2 Spill Response Plan (BMP F.6, C.9) ..................................................................... 72
4.6.2.2 Spill Prevention ................................................................................................ 72
4.6.2.2 Non-Hazardous Spills/Dumping....................................................................... 72
5
4.6.2.3 Hazardous Spills ............................................................................................... 73
4.6.2.3 Employee Training (BMP F.1) ......................................................................... 73
5.0 Program and Performance Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting ................................... 75
5.1 Monitoring Program ...................................................................................................... 75
5.1.1 Lake and Beach Monitoring - Lake County Health Department ........................... 75
5.1.1.1 Lake Michigan .................................................................................................. 76
5.1.1.2 Inland Beaches .................................................................................................. 76
5.1.2 Ravine Monitoring - SCM and City of Lake Forest .............................................. 78
5.1.3 Other Community Monitoring - City of Lake Forest ............................................ 78
5.2 Program Evaluation (BMP C.6) .................................................................................... 78
5.2.1 Monitoring Program Evaluation ............................................................................ 80
5.2.2 IDDE Program Evaluation .................................................................................... 80
5.2.3 SMPP Document Evaluation ................................................................................. 81
FIGURES
1 Lake County Watersheds and Subwatersheds 10
2 North Branch Chicago River Watershed 11
3 Lake Michigan Watershed 13
4 Lake Forest MS4 Outfalls
5 Status Lake Forest Receiving Waters
6 Roles of the MS4
7 Watershed-Based Plan Status
8 SMC Stream and Detention Basin Inventory Status
9 Impaired Lake Michigan Segments
10 Additional Community Monitoring Locations
TABLES
1 Water Quality Standards - Status of Receiving Waters Located in Lake Forest
APPENDICIES
A YEARLY TRACKING FORM
B DEWATERING FACT SHEET
C DESCRIPTION OF POLLUTANT INDICATORS
D ILLICIT DISCHARGE INCIDENT TRACKING FORMS
E STORM WATER OUTFALL SCREENING EQUIPMENT CHECKLIST
F STORM WATER OUTFALL INSPECTION DATA FORMAND INSTRUCTIONS
G PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING FORM
6
H SE/SC INSPECTION FORM
I SAMPLE NOTICE OF VIOLATION LETTERS
J SAMPLE MAINTENANCE PLAN
K SPILL RESPONSE NOTICE
7
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
BMP Best Management Practices
CIRS Citizen Inquiry Response System
CMAP Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning
CWA Clean Water Act
CWP Center for Watershed Protection
DECI Designated Erosion Control Inspector
EOPCC Engineers Opinion of Probable Construction Cost
I&M Inspection and Maintenance
IDDE Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination
IDOT Illinois Department of Transportation
IEPA Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
ION Incidence of Non-compliance (with IEPA)
LCDOT Lake County Division of Transportation
LFCEL Lake Forest Collaborative for Environmental Leadership
LMU Lakes Management Unit of Lake County
MAC Municipal Advisory Committee of Lake County
MCM Minimum Control Measure
MS4 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems
NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service
NOI Notice of Intent
NOT Notice of Termination (with IEPA)
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
QLP Qualify Local Program
RVR Runoff Volume Reduction
SE/SC Soil Erosion and Sediment Control
SMC Lake County Stormwater Management Commission
SWALCO Solid Waste Agency of Lake County
SMPP Stormwater Management Program Plan
SPCC Spill Prevention Countermeasure and Control
TAC Technical Advisory Committee of Lake County
TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load
USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers
WDO Lake County Watershed Development Ordinance
WDP Watershed Development Permit
WMB Watershed Management Board
8
1.0 OVERVIEW OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PLAN
1.1 Introduction
This Stormwater Management Program Plan (SMPP) was developed by the City of Lake Forest
utilizing a SMPP template provided by the Lake County Stormwater Management Commission
(SMC). The purpose of the SMPP is to meet the minimum standards required by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) Phase II program. Federal regulations through the USEPA require that all
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s), located partially or fully in urbanized areas
based on the 2000 census, obtain stormwater permits for their discharges into receiving waters.
The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) has issued a new version of its MS4 Permit
which became effective on March 1, 2016. According to the new permit, MS4s have 180 days
from the effective date of the permit to comply with any changes or new provisions contained in
the permit.
The SMPP describes the procedures and practices that can be implemented by the City of Lake
Forest toward the goal of reducing the discharge of pollutants within stormwater runoff in order to
comply with Federal standards. Compliance with the SMPP is intended to protect water quality
thus contributing to the following amenities:
• cleaner lakes and streams,
• improved recreational opportunities and tourism,
• flood damage reduction,
• better aesthetics and wildlife habitat, and
• a safer and healthier environment for the citizens.
The SMPP addresses the primary program elements, including the manner in which City of Lake
Forest:
• reviews, permits and inspects construction activity within its limits;
• manages the planning, design and construction of projects performed within its limits;
• maintains its facilities and performs its day-to-day operations;
• works toward protecting the receiving waters from illicit discharges;
• provides public education and outreach;
• trains its employees in carrying out and reporting program activities; and
• continually monitors and evaluates the program.
The NPDES permit process regulates the discharge from MS4s, construction sites and industrial
activities based on amendments to the federal Clean Water Act (CWA) made in 1987 and the
subsequent regulations promulgated by the USEPA in 1990 and 1999.
In Illinois, the USEPA has delegated administration of the federal NDPES program to the IEPA.
On December 20, 1999 the IEPA issued a general NPDES Phase II permit for all MS4s. Under the
General Permit each MS4 was required to submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) declaring compliance
with the conditions of the permit by March 10, 2003. The original NOI describes the proposed
activities and best management practices (BMPs) that occurred over the original 5-year period
toward the ultimate goal of developing a compliant SMPP. At the end of the 5th year (March 1,
2008) the components of the SMPP were required to be implemented; per the ILR40 permit. The
9
IEPA reissued the ILR 40 permit on April 1, 2009 and again on March 1, 2016, including revisions
each time.
Additionally, under the General ILR10 permit also administered IEPA, all construction projects
that disturb greater than 1 acre of total land area are required to obtain an NPDES permit from
IEPA prior to the start of construction. Municipalities covered by the General ILR40 permit, are
automatically covered under ILR10 30 days after the IEPA receives the NOI from the municipality.
1.2 Water Quality Standards
The 1987 Water Quality Act also established new requirements and funding, through the CWA
Section 319, for states to development and implement nonpoint source pollution control.
Specifically, Section 319 required each state to: (1) identify navigable waters that, without
government action to control non-point sources of pollution, cannot be reasonably expected to
maintain applicable water quality standards or goals; (2) identify nonpoint sources that add
significant amounts of pollution to affected waters; and (3) development a nonpoint source water
pollution plan on a watershed-by-watershed basis. The IEPA created a program to comply with
these federal regulations. This program has 3 basic components.
1.2.1 Designated Uses
One of IEPA’s first steps in achieving compliance with the CWA was to identify all uses its waters
should support. IEPA identified seven designated uses; primary contact, secondary contact, fish
consumption, public and food processing water supply, indigenous aquatic life, aquatic life and
aesthetic quality. Then, each navigable water was evaluated to identify the designated uses it
should support.
1.2.2 Water Quality Criteria
IEPA determined a set of water quality criteria that need to meet based on each of the seven
designated uses. Some criteria are applicable for multiple Designated Uses.
1.2.3 Monitoring
IEPA is required to conduct a monitoring program for all of its receiving streams based on the water
quality criteria it should be meet for each of its designated uses according to the following process.
• Conduct Monitoring per Designated Use
• Determine if Water Quality Criteria are met
• Include Non-Supporting Waters on Impaired Waters report
• Rank non-supporting waters based on severity of problem.
IEPA is required to submit the monitoring results [305(b) report] to USEPA every 2 years. The
impaired waters report [303(d) report] and ranking are part of this report.
1.2.4 Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) reports are created by IEPA for impaired waters. These
reports are created by IEPA based on severity of impairment. IEPA creates TMDL reports for
impaired waters with the highest ranks. The majority of impaired waters do not yet have TMDL
reports. This graphic identifies the pieces of a TMDL report. Once the TMDL report is approved
by the USEPA, the recommended strategies should be implemented by the affected MS4.
10
1.3 Watershed, Sub-watersheds and Receiving Waters
FIGURE 1 - LAKE COUNTY WATERSHEDS
A watershed is the land area that contributes storm water to receiving water. A Receiving Water
is a natural or man-made system into which storm water or treated wastewater is discharged. In
Lake County, these include three major rivers and their tributary streams (North Branch of the
Chicago River, the Des Plaines River and the Fox River), as well as Lake Michigan. A Sub-
Watershed is the land area that contributes storm water to a tributary to a receiving water. Figure
1 above depicts the watersheds and subwatersheds in Lake County.
1.3.1 Watershed Descriptions
1.3.1.1 North Branch of the Chicago River Watershed
The majority of the City of Lake Forest lies within the North Branch of the Chicago River
watershed. Figure 2 on the following page presents a detailed mapping of this watershed.
11
12
FIGURE 2 - NORTH BRANCH CHICAGOE RIVER WATERSHED
13
The North Branch of the Chicago River (North Branch) watershed area covers an area of about 50
square miles in Lake County and 45 square miles in Cook County. It is the most urbanized of the
four major Lake County watersheds. There are three main tributaries of the North Branch Chicago
River, each identified as separate subwatersheds: the West Fork, Middle Fork, and the Skokie
River. Portions of the City of Lake Forest lie within the Middle Fork and the Skokie River
subwatersheds.
The North Branch watershed is tributary to the larger Chicago River Watershed that is formed of
the North and South Branches of the Chicago River. The Chicago River Watershed is a sub-basin
of the larger Illinois River Watershed.
The North Branch watershed in Lake County roughly extends from Route 132 (Grand Avenue in
Waukegan) on the north and continues into Cook County. The western boundary is approximately
½ mile to a mile west of Interstate 94; the eastern boundary follows Green Bay Road. Portions of
Gurnee, Park City, Waukegan, North Chicago, Lake Bluff, Green Oaks, Mettawa, Lake Forest,
Highwood, Highland Park, Deerfield, Riverwoods, Lincolnshire and Bannockburn make up the
North Branch Chicago River watershed in Lake County.
1.3.1.2 Lake Michigan Watershed
The eastern portion of the City of Lake Forest lies within the Lake Michigan Watershed. Figure 3
on the following page presents a detailed mapping of this watershed.
The Lake Michigan watershed drains 54 square miles of Lake County. Channels in this area
generally flow toward the east into Lake Michigan with the western limits at about Green Bay
Road. That portion of Lake Forest located within the Lake Michigan watershed is more specifically
located within the Bluff/Ravine Subwatershed.
The topography of the Lake Michigan watershed ranges from gently sloping topography to a
steep/ravine bluff system. A coastal beach-ridge plain is located along the lakeshore from the state
line south to the Waukegan harbor. The northern third of the watershed has increasingly become
suburbanized while the southern third is mostly entirely suburbanized. While the Lake Michigan
watershed contains some of the most urbanized area of the county, it boasts Illinois Beach State
Park and Spring Bluff and Fort Sheridan Forest Preserves with high quality water, wetland and
ravine resources.
Lake County communities located wholly or predominantly in the watershed include Beach Park,
Lake Bluff, Lake Forest, Highwood, Highland Park, North Chicago, Winthrop Harbor, Waukegan
and Zion. The Great Lakes Naval Base is also located in the watershed.
14
FIGURE 3 -
LAKE
MICHIGAN WATERSHED
1.3.1.3 Des Plaines River Watershed
A very small area of the City of Lake Forest lies within the Des Plaines River watershed; essentially
a small portion of land east of the Interstate 90 Tollway south of Highway 60.
The Des Plaines River watershed originates in Racine and Kenosha Counties in Wisconsin flowing
south into Illinois. The Des Plaines watershed in Lake County drains an area of approximately 202
square miles or 129,577 acres. It is the largest of the county’s four major watersheds. The
FIGURE 3
15
topography of the watershed is dominated by a gently rolling landscape with numerous wet marshy
areas. The Lake County portion of the watershed is divided into nine sub-watersheds.
Within Lake County, the Des Plaines River watershed includes the communities of Buffalo Grove,
Deer Park, Grayslake, Gurnee, Hawthorn Woods, Indian Creek, Kildeer, Libertyville, Lincolnshire,
Lindenhurst, Long Grove, Mettawa, Mundelein, Old Mill Creek, Riverwoods, Third Lake, Vernon
Hills, Wadsworth and Wheeling. Open space areas are concentrated along the floodplain of the Des
Plaines River, where the Lake County Forest Preserve District has substantial holdings that stretch
uninterrupted from the Wisconsin-Illinois border into Cook County.
It is noted that there are no outfalls associated with the Des Plaines River watershed within the City
of Lake Forest municipal limits.
1.3.2 Identifying Outfalls (BMP C.1)
An Outfall (as defined at 40 CFR 122.26(B)(9)) means a point source (as defined by 40 CFR 122.2)
at the point where a municipal separate storm sewer discharges into a “receiving water”. Open
conveyances connecting two municipal storm sewers, or pipes, tunnels or other conveyances which
connect segments of the same stream or other Waters of the United States are not considered
Outfalls. For the purposes of this manual the following definitions shall be used:
Outfall: Storm sewer outlet, or other open conveyance point discharge location, that discharges
into a Waters of the U.S, receiving stream or another MS4.
Regulated systems include the conveyance or system of conveyances including roads with drainage
systems, municipal streets, catch basins, gutters, ditches, swales, manmade channels or storm
sewers. High priority have been initially identified based on 1) land use of the area draining to the
outfall, 2) the size of the outfall, and 3) areas where storm water impacts resulting from the outfall
(e.g., erosion damage) are known to exist. To date six outfalls have been identified as high priority
outfalls using these criteria; these are identified in Figure 4 below.
Upon completion of the ravine assessment program described in Subsection 5.1.2 and the dry-
weather inspections described in Subsection 4.3.4.2, a re-assessment of the High Priority Outfall
list will be made.
The outfall map should be revised to incorporate permitted outfalls associated with new
developments. An outfall inventory should be performed every 5 years in conjunction with pre-
screening efforts (Subsection 4.3.4.2); the focus of this effort is to search for new outfalls.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Maintain outfall inventory, searching for new outfalls every 5 years.
• Identify high priority outfalls
16
FIGURE4 - LAKE FOREST STORM SEWER DISCHRGE LOCATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT OUTFALLS
17
1.4 Status of Waters
Table 1 below summarizes the status of receiving waters within the City of Lake Forest. This
information is also depicted on Figure 5. All stretches of the Middle Fork of the North Branch
and the Skokie River located within the municipal boundaries of the City of Lake Forest are
designated as impaired. In addition, that stretch of Lake Michigan bordering the City is also
designated as impaired. Finally, Eagle Lake is also designated as impaired. No other water
bodies within the municipal limits of the City have been assessed.
The most recent 303(d) list may be found at http://www.epa.state.il.us/water/water-
quality/index.html.
Information regarding TMDLs may be found at http://www.epa.state.il.us/water/tmdl/.
TABLE 1
WATER QUALTY STANDARD - STATUS OF RECEIVING WATERS
LOCATED WITHIN CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Water Body Segment /
Assessment
ID
Impairment Potential Cause TMDL Status
Chicago
River, North
Branch -
West Fork
HCCB-05 Aquatic Life Aldrin,
Chloride,
DDT,
Endrin
Hexachlorobenzene,
Oxygen, dissolved,
Phosphorus, total,
Total suspended solids (TSS)
Stage 3 (Chloride
and Oxygen,
dissolved)
Primary
Contact
Recreation
Fecal Coliform Stage 3
Chicago
River, North
Branch -
Middle Fork
HCCC-02 Aesthetic
Quality
Bottom deposits,
Phosphorus, total
--
Aquatic Life Chloride,
DDT,
Hexachlorobenzene,
Oxygen, dissolved,
Sedimentation/Siltation,
Total suspended solids (TSS)
Stage 3 (Chloride
and Oxygen,
dissolved)
Primary
Contact
Recreation
Fecal Coliform Stage 3
Chicago
River, North
Branch -
Skokie River
HCCD-01 Aquatic Life Chloride,
Oxygen, dissolved,
Phosphorus, total,
Total suspended solids (TSS)
Stage 3
Primary
Contact
Recreation
Fecal Coliform Stage 3
Eagle Lake UHH Aesthetic
Quality
Phosphorus, total,
Total suspended solids (TSS)
Stage 3
18
19
FIGURE 5: STATUS OF RECEIVING WATERS
At this time no TMDL requirements have been issued for receiving waters within the City of Lake
Forest. TMDL statuses will be reviewed as part of each year’s annual reports. Upon issuance of a
TMDL requirement, an implementation strategy or plan will be created and described in the annual
report incorporated into the next SMPP revision.
1.5 Countywide Approach to NPDES Compliance
The SMC is a countywide governmental agency created by county ordinance under the authority
of Illinois Revised Statute 55/5-1062. SMC’s goals include the reduction of flood damage and
water quality degradation. Another purpose of SMC is to assure that new development addresses
non-point source pollution, does not increase flood and drainage hazards to others, or create
20
unstable conditions susceptible to erosion. To accomplish this, the SMC works cooperatively with
individuals, groups, and units of government as well as serving as the corporate enforcement
authority for the Lake County Watershed Development Ordinance (WDO). The City of Lake
Forest is a certified community, and is responsible for enforcing the WDO. SMC utilizes technical
assistance, education programs and watershed planning to increase public awareness of natural
resources and the impacts of urbanization on stormwater quality. In addition, SMC provides
solutions to problems related to stormwater and identifies effective ways of managing natural
resources.
The General Permit allows for MS4s to take credit for activities being performed by a Qualifying
Local Program (QLP) toward meeting its permit requirements. The SMC is a QLP for MS4s in
Lake County. As part of their ongoing services, SMC performs some functions related to each of
the six minimum control measures (MCM). SMC has been providing services under four of the
six minimum control categories since it began implementing a comprehensive, countywide
stormwater program in 1991. However, MS4s are required to provide additional services for each
of the MCMs with the greatest effort in the Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) and
Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping categories. A detailed discussion of the QLP program is
described in Section 3.
21
2.0 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
This Section describes the organizational structures of the City of Lake Forest, the County and
IEPA. It further discusses the roles and responsibilities of the various involved parties.
2.1 Implementation of this SMPP
The SMPP includes detailed discussions on the types of tasks that are required to meet the permit
conditions under the NPDES II program and how to perform these tasks. Appendix A includes
related tracking forms. The tracking forms are broken out into three categories (based on the
frequency of occurrence). There are three different tracking forms included: Annual, As-Needed
and On-Going. These forms should be printed annually and the progress of all tasks tracked. At
the end of the yearly reporting period (March 1 – February 28/29) the forms should be filed in a
binder to document SMPP related activities to IEPA, or their authorized agent, in the case of an
audit. It is anticipated that implementation of this SMPP constitutes compliance with the program.
The SMPP must be posted on the City of Lake Forest's website (Subsection 4.1.3).
Annual Reports, Monitoring Data, NOI and Stormwater Management Plans shall be kept for a
minimum of 5 years after the expiration of this permit (March 1, 2022).
2.2 Intra-Department Coordination
The City Council is the policy and budget setting authority for the City of Lake Forest. The
Departments of Engineering and Public Works work together to implement this SMPP. The
Stormwater Coordinator has primary responsibility for managing the overall program.
2.2.1 Stormwater Coordinator
The Supervisor of Sewer and Water is the Stormwater Coordinator and is responsible for the
oversight and implementation of this SMPP. The Stormwater Coordinator has many different
responsibilities, he/she:
• is the lead contact for coordination with the SMC, the IEPA, contractors, the
development community and other external regulatory agencies;
• understands the requirements of ILR40, ensures that the SMPP meets the requirements
of the permit and that the City of Lake Forest effectively implements the SMPP;
• ensures, or assists the Enforcement Officer in ensuring, that the City of Lake Forest
complies with all minimum WDO provisions;
• ensures that the Facilities comply with all minimum ILR40 permit requirements;
• is aware when a Project is required to be authorized under the ILR10 permit. In these
cases the Stormwater Coordinator should ensure that the NOI is received by IEPA at
least 30 days prior to the start of construction;
• assists the development community in understanding when a ILR10 permit is required
and whether construction sites comply with the general ILR10 and WDO permit
conditions; and
22
• understands the role illicit discharges play in the overall NPDES II program. In
general, an incidence of non-compliance must be filed with IEPA for illicit discharges
exiting an MS4’s outfall into a receiving water. Additionally, if the illicit discharge is
generated by a construction site, it may be necessary for both the applicant and the
MS4 to file the Incidence of Noncompliance (ION) form with IEPA.
FIGURE 6: ROLES OF MS4 1
1 Figure provided by Gewalt Hamilton & Associates
IEPA ILR40
(MS4
Requirements
Watershed
Development
Ordinance
Municipal
Facilities &
Projects
Private
Development
Within MS4
IEPA ILR10
Requirements
MS
Watershed
Development
Ordinance
Municipal
Facilities &
Projects
ILR40 MS4
Requirements
ILR10
Construction Site
Requirements
Private
Development
within MS4
23
2.2.2 Engineering Department
Engineering personnel support the Stormwater Coordinator in obtaining compliance with both the
NDPES and WDO programs.
The City of Lake Forest Supervisor of Engineering is also the Enforcement Officer with respect to
the administration and enforcement of the WDO. Additionally, the Enforcement Officer is
responsible for performing inspections and monitoring the development. Review and inspection
efforts can be performed by personnel under his/her direct supervision. A full description of the
Enforcement Officer responsibilities is included in Appendix E of the WDO. The Enforcement
Officer follows established procedures for notifying applicants of deficiencies and obtaining site
compliance (i.e. enforcement). The Enforcement Officer has the responsibility to concur that
projects meet WDO standards prior to the issuance of permits, and oversee site inspections during
construction. Refer to Subsections 3.4, 3.5, 4.4, and 4.5 for additional information on this process.
2.2.3 Public Works Department
Infrastructure maintenance activities within the City of Lake Forest are carried out by Public Works
personnel. Public Works personnel are designated as the primary entity responsible for performing
the duties specified under Subsection 4.3 - Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination and
Subsection 4.6 - Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping.
2.3 Coordination with Lake County Stormwater Management Commission
Coordination between the City of Lake Forest and the SMC occurs through both participation in
the SMC sponsored Municipal Advisory Committee (MAC) forums and through the Certified
Community Status under the WDO. The City of Lake Forest's Stormwater Coordinator is the lead
contact for participation in the MAC forums.
SMC is the primary entity responsible for meeting Public Education and Outreach and Public
Participation and Involvement MCMs. As a Certified Community, the City of Lake Forest's Officer
has lead responsibility for Construction Site Runoff Control and Post Construction Runoff Control
MCMs.
2.4 Coordination with Consultants
The City of Lake Forest may enlist the services of consultants to assist in the implementation of
the WDO (including, but not limited to, plan review, site inspections and enforcement), and the
design of MS4 projects.
2.5 Coordination of Contractors
The City of Lake Forest also has a responsibility to hire contractors who are knowledgeable of the
applicable requirements of the ILR40 and ILR10 permits. To provide appropriate training, or
require documentation that appropriate training has been attended, for all contractors responsible
for municipal green infrastructures and ensure they are aware of good housekeeping/pollution
prevention practices.
24
2.6 Coordination with the Public
Coordination with the Public occurs on several levels. In addition to the avenues described in this
SMPP the Public has the opportunity to comment on proposed preliminary and final plats through
the Plan Commission and Municipal Board process established in the Municipal Code.
2.7 Coordination with the IEPA
The City of Lake Forest is required to complete annual reports which describes the status of
compliance with the ILR40 permit conditions and other related information as presented on the
annual report template provided by the QLP. The annual report must be posted on the inset City's
website and submitted to the IEPA by the first day of June each year. Annual reporting to IEPA
should consist of “implemented SMPP” for all tasks completed in accordance with this SMPP.
Additional information should be provided for areas of enhancement or tasks not completed.
Records regarding the completion and progress of the SMPP commitments must be kept by the
community. The tracking form, described in Subsection 2.1, should be updated throughout the
year. The completed forms should be located in a binder with necessary supporting documentation.
The binder must be available for inspection by both IEPA and the general public.
2.8 Coordination with the Development Community
The City of Lake Forest has a responsibility to assist the development community in understanding
when an ILR10 permit is required and whether construction sites comply with the general ILR10
and WDO permit conditions. In general, an incidence of non-compliance must be filed with IEPA
for illicit discharges exiting an MS4’s outfall into a receiving water. Additionally, if the illicit
discharge is generated by a construction site, it may be necessary for both the applicant and the
MS4 to file an ION form with IEPA.
Furthermore, the municipality has a responsibility to inform the development community that they
are required to hire contractors which meet the qualifications necessary under the program, refer to
Subsection4.4.2 for additional information on qualified personnel.
25
3.0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM – THE QUALIFYING
LOCAL PROGRAM
The City of Lake Forest’s SMPP addresses six MCM categories, each of which is necessary in an
effort to reduce/eliminate stormwater pollution in receiving water bodies. The QLP role in
addressing each MCM is described in this Section. Additional MS4 efforts conducted by the City
of Lake Forest are described in Section 4.0. Both this Section and Section 4 address the following
control measures:
• Public education and outreach
• Public participation
• IDDE
• Construction
• Post Construction
• Housekeeping
The SMC requires, through the WDO, local stormwater management programs to implement one
or more of the MCMs specified in the IEPA’s General NPDES Permit No. ILR40 (MS4 Permit),
making it a QLP. Consistent with the County’s comprehensive, countywide approach to
stormwater management, as a QLP, SMC has been working since the early 2000’s, when began the
process of expanding its NPDES Stormwater Program to include small MS4s, to assist Lake County
MS4s in developing and implementing efficient and effective stormwater management programs.
Although SMC is not itself an MS4, as it does not own or operate a separate storm sewer system,
it does perform activities related to each of the six MCMs described in IEPA’s General NPDES
Permit No. ILR40. SMC remains committed to performing a variety of stormwater management
activities across the County – which are described in more detail below – to provide Lake County
with a baseline Countywide stormwater management program that can be built upon by each of the
individual MS4s. In addition to the stormwater management activities described below, SMC
program is continually evolving, to better assist Lake County MS4s in meeting the requirements of
the new 2016 MS4 Permit.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Provide NOI template in accordance with 2016 ILR40s permit.
• Provide yearly annual reporting template including a description of QLP activities for the
applicable permit year.
• Research, compile, and make available information regarding receiving waters, impaired
waters, pollutants causing such impairments, and the status of TMDL development on
such waters. Expand the “State of Lake County Water’s segment of the annual report
template accordingly.
• Provide Stormwater Pollution Plan template for use by Lake County MS4s.
3.1 Public Education
SMC will continue to support Lake County MS4s in the development and implementation of their
stormwater management programs by performing activities related to the Public Education and
Outreach MCM, as described below.
26
3.1.1. Distributed Paper Materials (BMP-A.1)
SMC compiles, develops, and distributes throughout Lake County a variety of materials related to
stormwater management. SMC has produced a number of pamphlets and brochures related to
stormwater management and prepares a quarterly newsletter, “Mainstream,” as well as an Annual
Report, which highlight successful stormwater management activities conducted throughout Lake
County. SMC also prepares project fact sheets that provide information about ongoing and recently
completed stormwater management projects. In addition, SMC has developed or collaborated on a
number of manuals related to stormwater management, such as “Riparian Areas Management: A
Citizen’s Guide,” “A Citizen's Guide to Maintaining Stormwater Best Management Practices,” and
the “Streambank Stabilization Manual,” and will continue to develop or collaborate on such
manuals or manual updates on an as-needed basis.
Additionally, SMC researches and compiles materials related to stormwater management from a
variety of sources including the QLP, IEPA, USEPA, CWP, Chicago Metropolitan Agency for
Planning or CMAP (previously Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission “NIPC”), University
of Wisconsin Extension, Solid Waste Agency of Lake County (SWALCO) and other agencies and
organizations. SMC is a clearing house for MS4 communities by making available the following
types of materials available through their take-a-way rack or web-site:
• Informational sheets/pamphlets regarding storm water BMPs including cost-benefits and
implementation guidance,
• Informational sheets/pamphlets regarding water quality BMPs,
• Informational sheets/pamphlets regarding construction site activities (soil erosion and
sediment control BMPs),
• Storage and disposal of fuels, oils and similar materials used in the operation of or leaking
from, vehicles and other equipment;
• Use of soaps, solvents or detergents used in the outdoor washing of vehicles, furniture and
other property,
• Paint and related décor;
• Lawn and garden care; and
• Winter de-icing material storage and use.
• Informational sheets/pamphlets regarding green infrastructure strategies such as green
roofs, rain gardens, rain barrels, bioswales, permeable piping, dry wells and permeable
pavement.
• Informational sheets/pamphlets regarding the hazards associated with illegal discharges
and improper disposal of waste and the manner in which to report such discharges.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Distribute informational materials from “take away” rack at SMC.
• Upon request, distribute informational materials directly to Lake County MS4s for local
distribution.
3.1.2 Speaking Engagement (BMP-A.2)
SMC provides educational presentations related to IEPA’s NPDES Stormwater Program on a
regular basis at MAC meetings. Upon request, SMC will provide educational presentations related
to IEPA’s NPDES Stormwater Program to Lake County MS4s.
27
Measurable Goal(s):
• Provide educational presentations related to IEPA’s NPDES Stormwater Program at MAC
meetings.
• Upon request, provide educational presentations related to IEPA’s NPDES Stormwater
Program (e.g., “The Big Picture: Water Quality, Regulations & NPDES”) to Lake County
MS4s.
3.1.3 Public Service Announcement (BMP-A.3)
A public service announcement related to IEPA’s NPDES Stormwater Program will be included in
SMC’s quarterly newsletter, “Mainstream,” at least once each year. SMC will coordinate with the
Lake County Department of Transportation (LCDOT) to post watershed identification signage in
watersheds where watershed planning or project implementation efforts have occurred or are
occurring.
SMC also utilizes social media to reach out to additional target audiences. Both Facebook and
Twitter feeds are updated to include relevant water quality information and promote educational
opportunities across the County.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Include public service announcement related to IEPA’s NPDES Stormwater Program in its
quarterly newsletter, “Mainstream,” at least once each year.
• Post watershed identification signage in cooperation and collaboration with LCDOT.
• Provide information via social media (Facebook and Twitter).
3.1.4 Outreach Events (BMP-A.4)
SMC regularly sponsors and co-sponsors educational and technical training workshops on a variety
of stormwater management-related topics. Each year, SMC will sponsor or co-sponsor at least one
workshop on a topic related to IEPA’s NPDES Stormwater Program, such as soil erosion and
sediment control or stormwater BMPs that can be used to protect and improve water quality. SMC
also offers an annual deicing workshop and a training workshop on green infrastructure practices;
made available to both public employees and contractors.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Sponsor or co-sponsor workshop(s) on topics related to IEPA’s NPDES Stormwater
Program.
• Track workshops and events.
3.1.5 Classroom Educational Material (BMP-A.5)
Upon request, SMC will contribute to the development and compilation of materials for inclusion
in a stormwater education kit that can distributed to local students and teachers and/or other local
stakeholders. Additionally, upon request, SMC will provide information, materials, and training to
local students and teachers and/or other local stakeholders interested in conducting storm drain
stenciling.
28
Measurable Goal(s):
• Upon request, develop and compile materials for inclusion in a stormwater education kit.
• Upon request, provide information, materials, and training to local students, teachers and/or
stakeholders interested in conducting storm drain stenciling.
3.1.6 Other Public Educational - Website (BMP-A.6)
SMC maintains a website that contains a variety of materials and resources related to stormwater
management. The website provide information about IEPA’s NPDES Stormwater Program,
provide information about stormwater BMPs, allow for download of stormwater management-
related publications and documents, provide notices of upcoming meetings and ongoing projects,
includes watershed plans and watershed workgroup information, and provide links to a number of
other stormwater management-related resources including materials described in Subsection 3.1.1.
SMC will research, compile and make available materials about the impacts of climate change on
precipitation and stormwater runoff and the pollution prevention practices that can be used by
private property owners, and an evaluation of the impacts of climate change on existing flood
control techniques and practices used to achieve runoff volume reduction (RVR). A link to the
USEPA’s climate change website http://www3.epa.gov/climatechange is included on SMC’s
website.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Maintain and update the portion of the SMC website dedicated to IEPA’s NPDES
Stormwater Program with resources such as model ordinances, case studies, brochures, and
links including information related to climate change.
• Make “The Big Picture: Water Quality, Regulations & NPDES” presentation available to
Lake County MS4s.
3.2 Public Outreach
SMC will continue to support Lake County MS4s in the development and implementation of their
stormwater management programs by performing activities related to the Public
Participation/Involvement MCMs, as described below.
3.2.1 Public Panel (BMP-B.1)
SMC provides procedural guidance and implements its Citizen Inquiry Response System (CIRS)
for receiving and taking action on information provided by the public regarding post-construction
stormwater runoff control. SMC coordinates and conducts public meetings as well as committee
meetings that are open to the public. A monthly SMC meeting is open to the public and involves
the SMC Board of Commissioners, which includes six municipal representatives and six county
board members.
The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) was created in 1992 to assist in the development,
review, and revision of the WDO and the associated administrative policies and procedures. TAC
is made up of representatives from the development, environmental, municipal, and consulting
engineering fields. TAC meetings are held monthly or on an as-needed basis.
The MAC is made up of municipal, township, drainage district, consulting firm, and county
representatives. MAC has worked to discuss, coordinate, and collaborate on the implementation of
29
IEPA’s NPDES Stormwater Program. MAC will continue to meet quarterly or as needed to assist
Lake County MS4s with the implementation of IEPA’s NPDES Stormwater Program.
The Watershed Management Board (WMB) meets annually to make recommendations on
stormwater BMP project funding. WMB members include chief municipal elected officials,
township supervisors, drainage district chairs, and county board members from each district within
each of Lake County’s four major watersheds.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Implement and provide guidance on existing CIRS procedures.
• Provide notice of public meetings on SMC website.
• Track number of meetings conducted
3.2.2 Stakeholder Meeting (BMP-B.3)
SMC is actively involved in watershed planning throughout Lake County. SMC believes that the
watershed planning process cannot happen and will not be successful without the input, interest,
and commitment of the watershed stakeholders. Watershed stakeholders may include
municipalities, townships, drainage districts, homeowner associations, lakes management
associations, developers, landowners, and local, county, state, and federal agencies.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Provide notice of stakeholder meetings on SMC website.
• Track number of watershed committee meetings conducted.
• Establish watershed planning committees for each new watershed planning effort.
3.2.3 Program Involvement (BMP-B.6)
Consistent with Lake County’s comprehensive, countywide approach to stormwater management,
SMC serves as a QLP for all Lake County MS4s. In this role, in 2002, SMC proactively formed
the MAC to provide a forum for representatives of local MS4s, which include municipalities,
townships, and drainage districts, to discuss, among other topics, the implementation of IEPA’s
NPDES Stormwater Program. SMC will continue to facilitate quarterly MAC meetings and will
continue to provide general support to Lake County MS4s as they continue to develop and
implement their stormwater management programs. SMC will prepare an annual report on its
stormwater management activities and will provide guidance to Lake County MS4s in preparing
their own annual reports.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Track number of MAC meetings conducted.
• Prepare annual report template for use by Lake County MS4s including a description of
the QLP stormwater management activities.
• Prepare SMPP template for use by Lake County MS4s in creating their own SMPP.
3.3 Illicit Discharge Program
SMC will continue to support Lake County MS4s in the development and implementation of their
stormwater management programs by performing activities related to the IDDE MCM, as described
30
below. Note, however, that the primary responsibility for the implementation of the IDDE MCM
lies with the MS4.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Continue to make available information regarding prioritization of outfalls for illicit
discharge screening activities.
• Continue to make available compiled GIS data related to the County’s existing
stormwater infrastructure (e.g. storm sewer atlases, stream inventories and detention
basin inventories).
3.3.1 Regulatory Control Program (BMP-C.2)
SMC provides local MS4s with model and example illicit discharge ordinances that prohibit all
non-stormwater discharges, including illegal dumping, to the storm sewer system. Additionally,
the WDO includes provisions that prohibit illicit discharges to the storm sewer system during
construction (i.e., prior to final site stabilization) on development sites.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Provide model and example illicit discharge ordinances to Lake County MS4s.
• Continue to administer and enforce the WDO.
3.3.2 Other Illicit Discharge Controls (BMP C.10)
SMC regularly sponsors and co-sponsors educational and technical training workshops on a variety
of stormwater management-related topics. Each year, SMC will sponsor or co-sponsor an IDDE
workshop or other training workshop related to IEPA’s NPDES Stormwater Program and track the
number of attendees that attend the workshop as previously described in Subsection 3.1.4.
Additionally, as part of its public education and outreach efforts, SMC distributes informational
materials throughout Lake County about the hazards associated with illegal discharges and the
improper disposal of waste.
As described in Subsection 5.1 the Lake County Health Department’s Lake Management Unit
(LMU) performs extensive monitoring of inland lakes and Lake Michigan Beaches. Upon
receiving a request for service, LMU staff investigates possible pollution sources, fish kills and
other lake or pond related inquires throughout the county. Although the Lakes Management Unit
is not an enforcement agency, they direct non-jurisdictional issues to appropriate agencies for
enforcement, if necessary.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Sponsor or co-sponsor and track the number of attendees at an IDDE workshop or other
training workshop related to IEPA’s NPDES Stormwater Program.
• Distribute informational materials about the hazards of illicit discharges and illegal
dumping from “take away” rack at SMC and SMC website.
3.4 Construction Site Runoff Control
The goal of the WDO is to ensure that new development does not increase existing stormwater
problems or create new ones. The WDO establishes countywide standards for runoff maintenance,
31
detention sites, soil erosion and sediment control, water quality, wetlands and floodplains. These
provisions are only applicable for regulated development activities as defined by the WDO.
Applicants that hydrologically disturb greater than 1-acre are also required to seek coverage under
the statewide construction general permit by filing an NOI with IEPA.
The WDO is implemented primarily at the local level. The majority of the fifty-three municipalities
in the county were "Certified Communities." The designation allows those communities to enforce
WDO standards within their own jurisdictions. Note, however, that the primary responsibility for
the implementation of the Construction Site Runoff Control MCM in certified communities (i.e.,
communities certified by SMC to administer and enforce the provisions of the WDO) lies with the
MS4.
SMC will continue to support Lake County MS4s in the implementation of the Construction Site
Runoff Control MCM by administering and enforcing the WDO and performing other stormwater
management activities, as described below. SMC administers the WDO and issues permits for the
developments within the Non-Certified Communities.
3.4.1 Regulatory Control Program (BMP D.1)
The WDO is the regulatory mechanism that requires the use of soil erosion and sediment controls
on development sites throughout Lake County. The soil erosion and sediment control provisions
are included in Article 6 of the WDO. At a minimum, these standards apply to any development
project that hydrologically disturbs 5,000 square feet of land or more.
SMC has also created a Designated Erosion Control Inspector (DECI) program. The purpose of the
program is to facilitate positive communication between the permit issuing agency, whether such
agency be SMC or a certified community, and the permit holder, by creating a single point of
contact for the discussion and resolution of site soil erosion and sediment control issues and
concerns. Furthermore, the program is intended to improve site conditions, minimize
environmental impacts, and educate contractors, developers, and inspectors about the use of soil
erosion and sediment control BMPs. It is worth noting that the DECI program was designed to
closely mirror the inspection requirements of IEPA’s General NPDES Permit No. ILR10.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Continue to administer and enforce the WDO.
• Continue to administer the DECI program outlined by the WDO.
3.4.2 Erosion and Sediment Control BMPs (BMP D.2)
§600 of the WDO specifies the soil erosion and sediment control measures that must be used in
conjunction with any land disturbing activities conducted on a development site. Ordinance
provisions include but are not limited, to the following:
• Grading, soil erosion and sediment control plan. The plan must:
o Minimize soil disturbance
o Prevent discharge of sediment from the site through the implementation of soil erosion
control practices, primarily, and sediment control secondarily
o Protect receiving waters, natural areas and adjacent properties from damage which may
result from the proposed grading
32
o complete installation of soil erosion and sediment control features prior to
commencement of hydrologic disturbance
o stabilize disturbed areas within 7 days of active disturbance
o avoid disturbance of streams whenever possible
o use controls that are appropriate for the size of the tributary drainage area
o protect functioning storm sewers from sediment
o prevent sediment from being tracked onto adjoining streets
o limit earthen embankments to slopes of 3H:1V
o identify soil stockpile areas
o utilize statewide standards and specifications as guidance for soil erosion and sediment
control.
• Waste control;
• RVR Hierarchy and Water Quality;
• Established inspection duties for the applicant and procedures for inspections;
• Record keeping and reporting procedures;
• Security deposits to ensure faithful performance;
• Enforcement measures to achieve compliance; and
• One year warranty period, for applicable developments.
SMC has maintains technical guidance documents to accompany the WDO. The guidance
documents and the Illinois Urban Manual 2014 are used to guide the creation of development plans
that are in compliance with the provisions of the WDO and provides detailed information on the
use of soil erosion and sediment control BMPs.
As part of the permit review process, applicants that hydrologically disturb greater than 1-acre are
also required to seek coverage under the statewide construction general permit by filing a NOI with
IEPA. During construction, applicants are required to submit to IEPA ION forms, as necessary.
After the site is substantially stabilized, the applicant is required to submit a Notice of Termination
(NOT).
Measurable Goal(s):
• Continue to administer and enforce the WDO.
• Continue to maintain technical guidance documents.
3.4.3 Other Waste Control Programs (BMP D.3)
The WDO includes several provisions that address illicit discharges generated by construction sites.
The applicant is required to prohibit the dumping, depositing, dropping, throwing, discarding or
leaving of litter and construction material and all other illicit discharges from entering the
stormwater management system.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Continue to administer and enforce the provisions of the WDO related to the control of
waste and debris during construction on development sites.
3.4.4 Site Plan Review Procedures (BMP D.4, E.4)
A community’s designated Enforcement Officer is responsible for reviewing and permitting
development plans and for administering and enforcing the provisions of the WDO. Within
33
certified communities (i.e., communities certified by SMC to administer and enforce the provisions
of the WDO), responsibility for reviewing and permitting development plans and for administering
and enforcing the provisions of the WDO lies with the MS4; within non-certified communities, the
designated enforcement officer is SMC’s chief engineer. All designated Enforcement Officers
must pass an exam in order to qualify to act as such. SMC administers this enforcement officer
program, providing training on an as-needed basis to all enforcement officers to assist them in
passing the exam, and maintains an up-to-date list identifying each community’s designated
enforcement officer. In addition to administering the enforcement officer program, SMC
periodically reviews each community’s WDO administration and enforcement records, using the
results of such review to evaluate the performance of certified communities and designated
enforcement officers.
SMC maintains technical guidance documents to accompany the WDO. These documents are used
to guide the creation of development plans that are in compliance with the provisions of the WDO
and provide additional guidance on the administration and enforcement of the ordinance.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Administer the Enforcement Officer program outlined by the WDO.
• Maintain an up-to-date list identifying each community’s designated enforcement officer.
• Periodically review each community’s WDO administration and enforcement records.
• Continue to maintain technical guidance documents.
3.4.5 Site Inspection/Enforcement Procedures (BMP D.6, E.5)
Article 5 of the WDO contains both recommended and minimum requirements for the inspection
of development sites. Within certified communities, the community’s designated enforcement
officer is responsible for conducting these inspections; within non-certified communities, SMC’s
chief engineer is responsible for conducting these inspections. Per the ordinance, these inspections
may be conducted by a community’s designated enforcement officer at any stage in the construction
process. For major developments, as defined by the WDO, the enforcement officer conducts site
inspections, at a minimum, upon completion of installation of soil erosion and sediment controls,
prior to the start of any other land disturbing activities, and after final stabilization and landscaping,
prior to the removal of soil erosion and sediment controls.
Article 12 of the WDO specifies the legal actions that may be taken and the penalties that may be
imposed if the provisions of the WDO are violated. If development activities on a development site
are not in compliance with the requirements of the WDO, the enforcement officer may issue a stop
work order on all development activity on the development site or on the development activities
that are in direct violation of the WDO. In addition, failure to comply with any of the requirements
of the WDO constitutes a violation of the WDO, and any person convicted of violating the WDO
may be fined.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Document and track the number of site inspections conducted by SMC.
3.4.6 Public Information Handling Procedures (BMP D.5)
SMC provides a number of opportunities for the receipt and consideration of information submitted
by the public. SMC’s CIRS documents and tracks the resolution of problems and complaints
reported by the public. SMC’s website provides information on “who to call” for various
34
stormwater-related problems and concerns. An Interagency Coordination Agreement between
SMC, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and the Natural Resources Conservation Service
(NRCS) specifies that if any of these agencies receive a report of a soil erosion and sediment control
issue, they will relay such report to SMC. SMC will then investigate the report and prescribe
appropriate corrective actions, sharing the results of such investigation with the property owner and
any applicable local, state, or federal agencies. Within certified communities, such investigations
are coordinated with the community’s designated enforcement officer.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Document and track the number of soil erosion and sediment control-related complaints
received and processed by SMC.
3.4.7 BMP Reference Information
Reference information includes, but is not limited to, the following sources:
• Native Plant Guide,
• Lake County SMC’s Technical Reference Manual,
• Illinois Urban Manual, 2014
• SMC’s
o soil erosion and sediment checklist,
o soil erosion and sediment control notes,
o typical construction sequencing,
• Construction details are available on the website,
• CMAP (previously Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission) Course Manuals,
• Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) manuals,
• Center for Watershed Protection (CWP) documents, and
• IEPA and USEPA publications.
3.5 Post-Construction Runoff Control
As described above, Lake County has adopted a countywide WDO that establishes the minimum
stormwater management requirements for development in Lake County, including requirements
for post-construction runoff control. SMC will continue to support Lake County MS4s in the
implementation of the Post-Construction Runoff Control MCM by administering and enforcing the
WDO and performing other stormwater management activities, as described below. Note, however,
that the primary responsibility for the implementation of the Post-Construction Runoff Control
MCM in certified communities (i.e., communities certified by SMC to administer and enforce the
provisions of the WDO) lies with the MS4.
3.5.1 Regulatory Control Program (BMP E.2)
The WDO requires all applicants to adopt stormwater management strategies for controlling post-
construction stormwater runoff on development sites. As outlined in Section 5 of the WDO, all
applicants must adopt stormwater management strategies that minimize increases in stormwater
runoff rates, volumes, and pollutant loads from development sites. Proposed stormwater
management strategies must address the RVR requirements described in §503 of the WDO and
35
must include appropriate stormwater BMPs to address the other applicable post-construction runoff
control requirements of the WDO.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Continue to administer and enforce the WDO.
3.5.2 Long Term O&M (BMP E.3)
The WDO requires that maintenance plans be developed for all stormwater management systems
designed to serve major developments, as defined by the WDO. Such maintenance plans must
include: a description of all maintenance tasks; an identification of the party or parties responsible
for performing such maintenance tasks; a description of all permanent maintenance easements or
access agreements, overland flow paths, and compensatory storage areas; and a description of
dedicated sources of funding for the required maintenance. The WDO also requires that all
stormwater management systems be located within a deed or plat restriction (e.g., easement) to
ensure that the system remains in place in perpetuity and that access to the system is maintained in
perpetuity for inspection and maintenance purposes.
Concerns related to a completed development or re-development shall be route to the
Enforcement Officer, or designee. Site inspections and/or follow-up maintenance
recommendations will be made to the property owner on a case by case basis.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Continue to administer and enforce the WDO.
3.5.3 Runoff Volume Reduction Hierarchy (BMP E.4)
As described above, a community’s designated enforcement officer is responsible for reviewing
and permitting development plans and for administering and enforcing the provisions of the WDO.
This includes a review of the stormwater BMPs that will be used to meet the post-construction
runoff control requirements of the WDO. Developments that exceed the thresholds identified in the
WDO are required to quantify the RVR provided by the site design, including a combination of
structural and/or non-structural BMPs that will reduce the discharge of pollutants, the volume and
velocity of storm water flow to the maximum extent practicable. The permittee should ensure that
the development plan addresses these provisions during the plan review process. The WDO was
written to specifically address the following ILR40 permit requirements.
Each permittee is also required to adopt strategies that incorporate storm water infiltration, reuse
and evapotranspiration of storm water into the project to the maximum extent practicable in
accordance with the qualitative RVR provisions of the WDO. Types of techniques include green
roofs, rain gardens, rain barrels, bioswales, permeable piping, dry wells and permeable pavement.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Continue to administer and enforce the WDO.
36
3.5.4 Other Post-Construction Runoff Controls (BMP E.7)
Through the WMB, SMC provides partial funding for flood damage reduction and surface water
quality improvement projects. The WMB, which includes representatives from the Lake Michigan,
North Branch of the Chicago River, Fox River, and Des Plaines River watersheds, meets annually
to review potential projects and to make recommendations on stormwater BMP project funding.
Members of the WMB include chief municipal elected officials, township supervisors, drainage
district chairmen, and county board members from each district found within each of Lake County’s
four major watersheds. The goal of the WMB program is to maximize opportunities for local units
of government and other groups to have input and influence on the solutions used to address local
stormwater management problems. Previous WMB-funded projects have reduced flooding,
improved surface water quality, and enhanced existing stormwater management facilities
throughout Lake County.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Conduct annual WMB meeting.
• Contribute funding to flood damage reduction and water quality improvement projects
through the WMB.
3.6 Pollution Prevention / Good Housekeeping
SMC will continue to support Lake County MS4s in the development and implementation of their
stormwater management programs by performing activities related to the Pollution
Prevention/Good Housekeeping MCM, as described below. Note, however, that the primary
responsibility for the implementation of the Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping MCM lies
with the MS4.
3.6.1 Employee Training Program (BMP F.1)
SMC will assist Lake County MS4s with the development and implementation of their employee
training programs by maintaining a list of known employee training resources and opportunities,
making available a software-based employee training program, and providing, upon request,
technical assistance to local MS4s in developing and implementing their employee training
programs. The CWP’s URSM Manual 9: Municipal Pollution Prevention Practice is a key
resource. In addition, each year, SMC will sponsor or co-sponsor training workshops as previously
described in Subsection 3.1.4.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Maintain a list of known employee training resources and opportunities.
• Make available the Excal Visual Storm Watch: Municipal Storm Water Pollution
Prevention software-based employee training program.
• Sponsor or co-sponsor a training workshop related to pollution prevention/good
housekeeping or another training workshop related to IEPA’s NPDES Stormwater
Program.
3.6.2 Flood Management / Assess Guidelines (BMP F.5)
In working toward meeting its primary goals of flood damage reduction and surface water quality
improvement, SMC follows a set of stormwater management policies that were created to define
its roles and responsibilities for stormwater management in Lake County. One of these policies is
37
to integrate multi-objective opportunities (e.g., flood damage reduction, surface water quality
improvement, environmental enhancement) into SMC-sponsored projects. In accordance with this
policy, SMC will evaluate all SMC-sponsored projects for multi-objective opportunities.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Track number of SMC-sponsored projects that are reviewed for multi-objective
opportunities.
3.6.3 Winter Roadway Deicing (BMP F.6)
Measurable Goal(s):
• Advise MS4 communities of watershed groups addressing issues associated with the use
of chlorides (i.e. road salt).
3.7 Watershed Plans
SMC has collaborated on a number of watershed based plans throughout the County. Watershed
plans are implemented by SMC and local communities and organizations as plan recommended
BMPs and projects are fleshed out with designs and budgets and funding is secured.
These plans were created in part to identify opportunities for watershed communities to integrate
multi-objective watershed management in community decisions and activities; establish an
inventory of stormwater and pollutants; and to improve degraded conditions in the watershed by
implementing BMPs and programs to retrofit existing flood control techniques and problem areas
and prevent future problems from occurring. The adoption of these Plans will guide the successful
implementation of a series of individual site-specific projects and watershed-wide programmatic
actions to: improve water quality, reduce flood damage potential, protect and enhance natural
resources including the watershed’s lakes, streams and wetlands; and in addition, will provide
watershed education and recreation opportunities and improve community cooperation and
participation in watershed improvement activities.
The creation and adopted watershed based plans were completed on a voluntary basis and not to
meet any ILR40 permit requirements. However, implementation of individual site-specific projects
or programmatic actions without the use of 319 funding can be cited by an MS4 community toward
meeting ILR40 permitting requirements. The status of the County’s watershed planning efforts is
depicted on Figure 7 on the following page.
3.7.1 North Branch of the Chicago River Watershed
Completed watershed plans include the North Branch of the Chicago River Watershed-Based Plan,
North Branch Chicago River Open Space Plan and the Skokie River Headwaters/North Chicago
Flood Damage Reduction Study.
3.7.2 Lake Michigan Watershed
Watershed-based plans have been completed and approved for the Dead River Kellogg Creek, and
Waukegan subwatersheds. Extensive ravine and stream inventories have been completed for the
entire Lake Michigan Watershed, excluding stream segments in the coastal plain of Illinois Beach
State Park.
38
FIGURE 7 - STATUS OF WATERSHED-BASED PLANS
39
4.0 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PLAN - CITY OF LAKE
FOREST PROGRAM
This section describes that portion of the City of Lake Forest's Stormwater Management Program
that is implemented by the City of Lake Forest, in collaboration with other local stakeholder
partners.
The City of Lake Forest is a member of the Lake Forest Collaborative for Environmental
Leadership (LFCEL); other members include Lake Forest Open Lands, Lake Forest College, Lake
Forest Community High School District 115 and Lake Forest Elementary District 67. The LFCEL
has the following stated goals:
• To promote awareness of environmental concerns associated with the decline of
ecosystems and the loss of biological diversity and recognize the value of protecting our
natural heritage and open spaces. These environmental concerns include water quality,
ravine and bluff degradation, eradication of invasive species, air quality issues, tree
disease and pest threats, and reduction of waste.
• To promote awareness of community-wide projects and programs aimed at improving the
natural environment in Lake Forest and improving the quality of life of residents.
• To engage a network of resident volunteers to work and take action within our
community to address environmental issues and manage the natural resources of the
City.
• To facilitate community governance and subsequent action through collaboration with
Collaborative members' groups and City residents.
• Provide collaboration in the development of responsible environmental standards, City
ordinances and policies, and promotion of educational awareness for environmental
practices in our community.
The LFCEL provides a unique stakeholder partnership to promote goals that are in common with
those of the City's Stormwater Management Program. The LFCEL meets on a monthly basis. A
representative of the City of Lake Forest's Public Works Department actively participates in these
meetings. The LFCEL maintains a webpage (http://www.cityoflakeforest.com/environmental-
initiatives) that can be accessed on the City’s Environmental Initiatives webpage @
http://www.cityoflakeforest.com.
In July 2016, the City in conjunction with the LFCEL published the Lake Forest Sustainability
Plan. This Plan, (also available on the LFCELs webpage), addresses storm water management and
water usage, ecosystem vitality and ravine conservation and waste management among other
topics.
The goals for each of these topics set forth in the Sustainability Plan are as follows:
Stormwater Management and Water Usage:
• Reduce the volume of stormwater entering the ravines, Skokie River, and Middlefork of
the Chicago River North Branch using stormwater infrastructure best management
practices
• Improve the quality of water entering Lake Michigan through the ravines
40
• Increase water conservation
• Educate residents on the importance of Lake Forest-specific water issues
Ecosystem Vitality and Ravine Conservation:
• Preserve, protect, and when possible, expand open spaces and parks, particularly ravines
• •Use sustainable land management practices throughout the community
• •Increase native plantings
• •Preserve existing trees and increase native tree canopy coverage, particularly oak
varieties.
Waste Management:
• Reduce the amount of landfilled waste
• Improve recycling rates and increase awareness of recycling and responsible disposal
alternatives
• Increase composting
• Increase material reuse
The City of Lake Forest possesses a number of ravines; unique habitats located within the Lake
Michigan watershed. These natural erosional features harbor unique plant communities, but are
susceptible to un-natural and accelerated erosion due to changes in stormwater flow. They are
addressed in the City’s Sustainability Plan, and also are the focus of habitat assessment and
restoration activities undertaken by the City as well as by various stakeholders, including the SMC,
Alliance for the Great Lakes, with Lake Michigan Watershed Ecosystem Partnership. These
susceptible habitats are thus a special focus of the stormwater management efforts being undertaken
by the City of Lake Forest, as described in this section of the SMPP.
As identified in the Sustainability Plan the City has developed a Steep Slope Ordinance (Lake
Forest Construction Standard - Section 46-15 Steep Slopes). The City also has a Landscaper
Certification Program which insures the Contractor carries appropriate liability insurance. The City
is also investigating the development of a Pesticide Protocol. .
In 2017, the City of Lake Forest has also undertaken a Ravine Assessment Program; which entails
a field assessment of each of the ravines located within the City. This program is detailed in
Subsection 5.1.2.
4.1 Public Education and Outreach
In additional to the extensive QLP efforts, which are described in more detail in Subsection 3.1,
the City of Lake Forest utilizes a variety of methods to educate and provide outreach to the public
about the importance of managing pollutants that potentially could enter the stormwater system.
The program includes the following activities which are discussed in greater detail within this
Subsection.
• Preparation of a Stormwater Management Policy.
• Distribution of pamphlets regarding stormwater BMPs, water quality BMPs, and proper
hazardous waste use and disposal.
41
• Distribute information on water quality/stormwater via the City of Lake Forest's Dialogue
newsletter.
• Attend/sponsor outreach activities to homeowners / property owner associations,
commercial / industrial facilities, schools, and other events.
• Coordinate, publicize, and participate in annual SWALCO events.
• Maintain a website which offers links to additional educational information, and ways to
contact the City of Lake Forest personnel.
• Advise on the potential impacts and effects on stormwater discharge due to climate
change http://epa.gov/climatechange.
4.1.1 Stormwater Management Policy
The City of Lake Forest City Council adopted a Stormwater Management Policy in 2016. The
purpose of the policy is to address and educate residents on home and property drainage issues
relating to stormwater within the City of Lake Forest. The Policy provides procedures for
conducting inspections and maintenance relating to stormwater concerns raised by property
owners. The official policy is available on the City’s website @
https://www.cityoflakeforest.com/assets/1/7/Stormwater_Management_Policy.pdf.
A policy flyer is also available on the City’s website @
https://www.cityoflakeforest.com/assets/1/7/Stormwater_Management_Flyer2.pdf
4.1.2 Distribution of Paper Materials (BMP A.1)
The City of Lake Forest provides educational materials including outreach publications prepared
by a variety of regulatory and private organizations that address stormwater management and
encourage residences to report environmental concerns.
• City of Lake Forest “Stormwater Management Brochure”
• “Steep Slopes, Long Legacy" brochure.
• "Steep Slopes, Long Legacy" brochure for homeowners near ravines.
These publications are provided in the following manner:
• At outreach events (Subsection 4.1.2).
• On-line at the LFCEL website (Subsection 4.1.3).
• At scheduled meetings with the general public. These meetings are on an as-needed or as-
requested basis and may be with the home owners associations, businesses, or local
schools.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Support QLP efforts.
• Distribute informational materials including the LFCEL website.
42
4.1.3 Outreach Events (BMP A.4)
In addition to the QLP’s efforts to sponsor or co-sponsor workshops and provide educational
presentations, which are described in more detail in Subsection 3.1, the City of Lake Forest will
attend and/or sponsor outreach events and scheduled meetings with the general public on
stormwater management-related topics. Events sponsored by the QLP often offer the opportunity
to share information and facilitate a collective focus on potential solutions to the challenges faced
by the County, municipalities, and other stakeholders.
The City of Lake Forest and/or the LFCEL will host at least on public meeting per year that will
address issues related to storm water management, water use and proper household waste
management. Audiences may include the home owners associations, lake associations, businesses,
and neighborhood groups. Notifications of these meeting will be provided on the City website
(Subsection 4.1.3) and / or the City’s Dialogue newsletter (Subsection 4.1.4). Presentations will be
linked at the LFCEL website.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Host one public meeting annually.
• Support QLP efforts.
4.1.4 Other Public Education - Web Site (BMP A.6)
In addition to the QLP’s efforts to distribute information via its website, which are described in
more detail in Subsection 3.1.6, the City of Lake Forest and the LFCEL have added stormwater
information via the LFCEL webpage that is available through the LECELs website @
http://www.cityoflakeforest.com/environmental-initiatives.
This webpage that contains materials and resources related to stormwater management. It includes
a webpage that provides:
• Information about IEPA’s NPDES Stormwater Program,
• Information about the stormwater management program, including its SMPP, NOI, Permit,
Annual Report and Green Practices,
• Copies of informational brochures and/or website links, including those described in
Subsection 4.1.2. as well as those which that address the following specific BMPs:
o Vehicle fluid maintenance (Subsection 4.1.8)
o Car / Outdoor Washing (Subsection 4.1.9)
o Lawn and Garden Care (Subsection 4.1.10)
o Green Infrastructure (Subsection 4.1.11)
o Pool dewatering (Subsection 4.1.12)
• Links to a number of other stormwater management-related resources, including the Lake
County SMC (i.e., the QLP’s) website at:
https://www.lakecountyil.gov/553/Stormwater-Management-Commission
Measurable Goal(s):
• Maintain and update the portion of the website dedicated to its stormwater management
program including links to SMC, IEPA and SWALCO.
• Post SMPP, the NOI and current and previous Annual Reports on the website.
43
4.1.5 Other Public Education – City Newsletter (BMP A.6)
The City of Lake Forest provides the "Dialogue" newsletter, a quarterly publication that is mailed
to all residents and also published on the City's website @ http://www.cityoflakeforest.com/lake-
forest-life/residents/city-dialogue-newsletter. The Dialogue includes sections on
Sanitation/Recycling, as well as Stormwater, and provide a venue for notifying residents of up-
coming events.
4.1.6 Storm Drain Stenciling & Markers (BMP A.6)
The City of Lake Forest supports the efforts of private entities to stencil or apply stickers to inlets,
and their purchase of factory stamped inlet grates. Stamped or stenciled inlets assist in educating
the public about stormwater runoff pollution. Efforts include:
• Providing the “Guide to Storm Drain Marking” (by SMC) to Home Owners Associations,
school groups etc. that express interest.
• Encouraging new development to furnish stamped inlet grates.
• Encouraging Home Owners Associations to annually paint the embossed area of any
stamped inlet grates within the subdivision.
• Instituting a program to add “stickers” or other markers to existing inlets through the use
of municipal staff or private groups.
• Existing inlet grates that are not factory stamped which need to be replaced, will be
replaced with a factory stamped inlet grate.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Support QLP and private efforts.
4.1.7 Household Hazardous Wastes (BMP A.4)
The SWALCO implements programs throughout Lake County aimed at reducing our reliance on
landfills through source reduction, recycling and energy recovery. These programs help residents
dispose of problem wastes, such as household chemicals, electronic equipment, and yard waste.
Their recycling programs are targeted at both commercial and residential markets to divert as much
solid waste as possible from reaching landfills. They also administer a public information and
education program including the “Earth Flag” and “Earth Flag Every Day” programs in the schools,
promoting SWALCO events, and publishing various resources and public service announcements.
The City of Lake Forest utilizes the following to support SWALCO and provide information on
household hazardous waste, including paint wastes generated by households, by:
• Coordinating and hosting annual household hazardous waste event with SWALCO for the
residents of the City and Lake County.
• Encouraging participation in this event by publishing the event on the City's website.
• Providing a link to SWALCOs website on the LFCEL website (Subsection 4.1.3).
• Additional outreach materials provided on the LFCELs website (Subsection 4.1.3).
Specifically, the following website links and/or brochures may be accessed through the
website:
o USEPA webpage on household hazardous waste @
https://www.epa.gov/hw/household-hazardous-waste-hhw
44
o Illinois EPA webpage on managing household hazardous waste @
http://www.epa.illinois.gov/topics/waste-management/waste-disposal/household-
hazardous-waste/index
o Illinois EPA factsheet on waste paint @ http://www.epa.illinois.gov/topics/waste-
management/factsheets/paint/index
In addition, the City also posts links to websites maintained by the USEPA and the IEPA on
managing household hazardous waste and paint waste.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Support and publicize SWALCO efforts.
• Maintain links to USEPA and IEPA websites for managing household waste.
4.1.8 Septic System Maintenance (BMP A.6)
Failing septic systems can be a major source of bacteria, nitrogen, and phosphorus, depending on
the overall density of systems present in a subwatershed. Failure results in illicit surface or
subsurface discharges to streams. Septic systems are a classic case of out of sight and out of mind.
Many owners take their septic systems for granted, until they back up or break out on the surface
of their lawn. Subsurface failures, which are the most common, go unnoticed. In addition,
inspections, pump outs, and repairs can be costly, so many homeowners tend to put off the expense
until there is a real problem. Lastly, many septic system owners are not aware of the link between
septic systems and water quality.
Under Ordinance 150.384, the City of Lake Forest requires homeowners to conduct an annual
septic system inspection by a certified contractor. This information is to be submitted by the
homeowner to the City.
4.1.9 Vehicle Fluid Maintenance (BMP A.6)
Dumping of automotive fluids into storm drains can cause major water quality problems, since only
a few quarts of oil or a few gallons of antifreeze can severely degrade a small stream. Dumping
introduces hydrocarbons, oil and grease, metals, and other pollutants to streams, which can be
especially toxic during dry-weather conditions when existing flow cannot dilute these discharges.
The major culprit is often the backyard mechanic who changes his or her own automotive fluids.
The City of Lake Forest utilizes the following to minimize such illicit discharges:
• Outreach materials provided on the LFCELs website (Subsection 4.1.3). Specifically, the
following website links and/or brochures may be accessed through the website:
o Illinois EPA used oil webpage @ http://www.epa.illinois.gov/topics/waste-
management/waste-disposal/used-oil/index
• Information distributed via the City’s Newsletter and at outreach events (Subsections 4.1.2
and 4.1.4)
• Providing a City contact for reporting illicit discharges (Subsection 4.2.3)
• Providing for fines and other enforcement actions for illicit discharges (Subsection 4.3.1.2).
• Promoting oil recycling at the annual SWALCO event.
Measurable Goal(s):
45
• Promote safe vehicle maintenance through previously described BMPs: Outreach Events,
Web Site and City Newsletter.
4.1.10 Car / Outdoor Washing (BMP A.6)
Car washing is a common neighborhood behavior that can produce transitory discharges of
sediment, nutrients and other pollutants to the curb, and ultimately the storm drain. The City of
Lake Forest utilizes the following to address this issue:
• Outreach materials provided on the LFCELs website (Subsection 4.1.3). Specifically, the
following website links and/or brochures may be accessed through the website:
o Mid-America regional Council "Wash Your Car the Right Way" brochure
(https://cfpub.epa.gov/npstbx/files/KSMO_CarWashing.pdf).
• Information distributed via the City’s Newsletter and at outreach events (Subsections 4.1.2
and 4.1.4)
Measurable Goal(s):
• Promote safe car washing through previously described BMPs via the LFCEL's Website,
City's Dialogue Newsletter, and/or Outreach Events.
4.1.11 Lawn and Garden Care (BMP A.6)
Fertilization decisions should be based on the nutritional and growth requirements of plant and the
soil conditions. Adding unneeded fertilizer to a yard does not benefit plants and could end up in the
storm water system or polluting streams, lakes, and aquifers. By taking care of lawns and gardens
properly, Lake Forest residents can save money, time and help the environment. Greenscaping
encompasses a set of landscaping practices that can improve the health and appearance of your
lawn and garden while protecting and preserving natural resources. This is further described in
EPA’s Greenscaping Publication. This publication is linked at the LFCEL website.
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-04/documents/greenscaping_-
_the_easy_way_to_a_greener_healthier_yard.pdf
Measurable Goal(s):
• Promote safe lawn and garden care through previously described BMPs via the LFCEL's
Website, City's Dialogue Newsletter, and Outreach Events.
4.1.12 Green Infrastructure (BMP A.6)
The City of Lake Forest encourages residents’ use of storm water infiltration, reuse and
evapotranspiration of storm water practices on their properties. Types of techniques include green
roofs, rain gardens, rain barrels, bioswales, permeable piping, dry wells and permeable pavement.
The City of Lake Forest utilizes the following to address this issue:
• Outreach materials provided on the LFCELs website (Subsection 4.1.3). Specifically, the
following website links and/or brochures may be accessed through the website:
o USEPA Brochure "Water Efficient Landscaping"
(https://www3.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/waterefficiency.pdf)
o USEPA green infrastructure website (https://www.epa.gov/green-infrastructure)
46
o Prairie Rivers Network brochure "Rain Gardens for Illinois"
(https://prairierivers.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Rain-Garden-Brochure-
20121.pdf)
o Rain Garden Network website on building rain gardens
(http://www.raingardennetwork.com/how-to-build-a-rain-garden-in-10-steps/)
Measurable Goal(s):
• Promote the use of green infrastructure on private property through previously described
BMPs via the LFCEL's Web Site , City's Dialogue Newsletter, and Outreach Events
4.1.13 Pool Dewatering (BMP A.6)
Chlorinated water discharged to surface waters, roadways or storm sewers has an adverse impact
on local stormwater quality. High concentrations of chlorine are toxic to wildlife, fish and aquatic
plants. Waters possessing extreme pH can also be detrimental to aquatic organisms; the pH of the
water should be between 6.5 and 8.5. Algaecides such as copper or silver can interrupt the normal
algal and plant growth in receiving waters and should not be present when draining. Prepare
appropriately before draining down a pool. It is recommended that one of the following measures
be used:
1) De-chlorinate the water in the pool prior to draining through mechanical or chemical means;
these types of products are available at local stores.
2) De-chlorinate the water in the pool through natural means. Pool water must sit at least 2 days
with a reasonable amount of sun, after the addition of chlorine or bromine. It is recommended
that the chlorine level be tested after 2 days to ensure that concentrations are at a safe level
(below 0.1-mg/l).
Measurable Goal(s):
• Promote safe pool dewatering through previously described BMPs via the LFCEL's Web
Site, City's Dialogue Newsletter, and Outreach Events.
• Efforts should be targeted each fall, preferably September and may incorporate the use of
the Pool Dewatering Fact Sheet presented in Appendix B.
4.2 Public Participation and Involvement
The public participation and involvement program allows input from citizens during the
development and implementation of the SMPP.
4.2.1 Public Review Process (BMP B.1)
In addition to the QLP’s efforts to coordinate and conduct public meetings as well as committee
meetings that are open to the public throughout Lake County, the City of Lake Forest presents each
year’s annual report to the Public Works Committee during an open meeting and provide for input
from the public as to the adequacy of the permittee's MS4 program. Annual reports will summarize
the Annual Facility Inspection Report (AFIR) made to the IEPA in accordance with the ILR40
Permit, and will be presented at the first Committee meeting held after submission of the AFIR to
the IEPA, which typically is the July meeting. The annual report will be listed as an agenda item
for the meeting, which are posted on the City of Lake Forest's website. Comments are evaluated
for inclusion and incorporated into the next revision of the SMPP as appropriate.
47
Measurable Goal(s):
• Present each year’s annual report to the Public Works Committee during an open
meeting and provide for input from the public as to the adequacy of the permittee’s
MS4 program.
• Support QLP efforts.
4.2.2 Environmental Justice Areas
Environmental justice is the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of
race, color, national origin, or income, with respect to the development, implementation, and
enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies.
EPA has this goal for all communities and persons across this nation. It will be achieved when
everyone enjoys:
• the same degree of protection from environmental and health hazards, and
• equal access to the decision-making process to have a healthy environment in which to
live, learn, and work.
Potential EJ communities will be identified based on IEPA guidance, to include communities with
a low-income and/or minority population greater than twice the statewide average. In addition, a
community may be considered a potential EJ community if the low-income and/or minority
population is less than twice the state-wide average but greater than the statewide average and that
has identified itself as an EJ community. If the low-income and/or minority population percentage
is equal to or less than the statewide average, the community should not be considered a potential
EJ community.
The City of Lake Forest utilized the following web application as another resource that can be used
to determine if an area would qualify for consideration as an environmental justice community:
https://ejscreen.epa.gov/mapper/index.html. This assessment has revealed that Lake Forest is not
an EJ community.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Identify EJAs, if any, within the community and ensure that BMP efforts are targeted at
these areas.
4.2.3 Complaints, Suggestions and Requests (BMP B.7)
The City of Lake Forest encourages the submission of complaints, suggestions and requests related
to its stormwater program. Calls are screened, logged and routed to the appropriate department for
action. General program related calls are directed to the Stormwater Coordinator, or designee.
Construction activity related telephone calls are directed to the Enforcement Officer, or designee.
Reports of dumping, spills or illicit discharges are directed to the Stormwater Coordinator.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Encourage submission of complaints, suggestions and requests by publicizing contact
information on previously described BMPs via the LFCEL's Web Site and the City's
Dialogue Newsletter.
48
4.3 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination 2
Currently, illicit discharges (defined in 40 CFR 122.26(B)(2)) contribute considerable pollutant
loads to receiving waters. There are two primary situations that constitute illicit discharges; these
include non-stormwater runoff from contaminated sites and the deliberate discharge or dumping of
non-stormwater. Illicit discharges can enter the storm sewer system as either an indirect or direct
connection.
Program objectives and procedures for the identification and removal of direct connections of
pollutants into the storm water management systems (including wetlands and receiving waters) are
included in this manual. Step-by-step instructions for identifying storm sewers suspected of
containing pollutants, suggestions for actions to be taken to determine the sources of identified
pollutants, and steps for correcting identified problems are provided. The results of the procedures
presented in this manual are intended to serve as indicators of pollution, rather than to provide
specific quantitative analysis. If the presence of pollutants is indicated, the detective work of
identifying the source of the discharge can begin. Once the source is identified, it can then be
corrected.
4.3.1 Regulatory Authority (BMP C.2)
Effective implementation of an Illicit Discharge Detections and Elimination (IDDE) program
requires adequate legal authority to remove illicit discharges and prohibit future illicit discharges.
This regulatory authority is achieved through adoption of the WDO and the local IDDE Ordinance.
Additionally, IEPA has regulatory authority to control pollutant discharges and can take the
necessary steps to correct or remove an inappropriate discharge over and above MS4 jurisdiction.
4.3.1.1 Watershed Development Ordinance
Several provisions of the WDO prohibit illicit discharges as part of the development process. These
provisions are only applicable for regulated development activities as defined by the WDO.
Regulated developments are required to meet the soil erosion and sediment control standards of the
WDO. Furthermore, the WDO requires that the applicant prohibit illicit discharges into the
stormwater management system generated during the development process.
The WDO allows the City of Lake Forest to require inspection deposits, performance bonds, and
to adopt/enforce violation procedures. These tools assist in achieving complaint construction sites.
These items are further discussed in Subsections 3.4, 3.5, 4.4 and 4.5.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Support QLP efforts.
• Enforce WDO
2 Subsection 4.3 is a revision of the Lake Michigan Watershed Stormwater Outfall Screening Program Training
Program (April 1994 by SMC), and incorporates material from the Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination: A
Guidance Manual for Program Development and Technical Assessments (October 2004 by the Center for Watershed
Protection and Robert Pitt, University of Alabama).
49
4.3.1.2 Illicit Discharge Ordinance
The City of Lake Forest has created and adopted an Illicit Discharge Ordinance – Ordinance 2014-
34; codified as Paragraph 150.401 under Title XV - Land Use and Development of the City of Lake
Forest, Illinois Code of Ordinances. This Ordinance is the mechanism to allow for the execution
and enforcement of the SMPP and is enforced.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Enforce Illicit Discharge Ordinance
4.3.1.3 Subdivision and Sediment Grading, Drainage and Erosion
Ordinances
The City of Lake Forest has created and adopted a Subdivision Ordinance and a Sediment Grading,
Drainage and Erosion Control Ordinances (Chapters 156 and 151, respectively under Title XV -
Land Use and Development of the City of Lake Forest, Illinois Code of Ordinances). These
Ordinances are administered by the Building and Engineering Departments and can be used to
further support the activities required by the SMPP.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Enforce Subdivision and Sediment Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Ordinances.
4.3.2 Understanding Outfalls and Illicit Discharges
Understanding the potential locations and the nature of illicit discharges in urban watersheds is
essential to find, fix and prevent them.
4.3.2.1 Potential Sources of Illicit Discharges
Inspecting storm water outfalls during dry-weather conditions reveals whether non-storm water
flows exist. If non-storm water flows are observed, they can be screened and tested to determine
whether pollutants are present.
There are two primary situations that constitute illicit discharges; these include non-storm water
runoff from contaminated sites and the deliberate discharge or dumping of non-storm water.
Deliberate discharge or dumping can enter the storm sewer system in two ways:
• direct connections – through direct piping connections to the storm sewer system, and
• indirect connections – through subtle connections, such as dumping or spillway of
materials into storm sewer drains.
Direct connections are more likely to result in continuous pollutant discharges than indirect
connections, which often produce limited, intermittent discharges of pollutants. USEPA guidance
indicates that direct connections to storm sewer systems most likely originate from
commercial/industrial facilities. Thus, the focus of this manual is the identification of illicit
discharges from commercial/industrial facilities.
50
4.3.2.2 Exclusions
It is noted that not all dry-weather flows are considered inappropriate discharges. Under certain
conditions, the following discharges are not considered inappropriate by USEPA or IEPA:
• Water line flushing,
• Landscaping irrigation,
• Diverted stream flows,
• Rising groundwater,
• Uncontaminated groundwater infiltration,
• Uncontaminated pumped groundwater,
• Discharges from potable water sources,
• Flows from foundation drains,
• Air conditioning condensation,
• Irrigation water,
• Springs,
• Water from crawl spaces,
• Lawn watering,
• Individual car washing,
• Flows from riparian habitats and wetlands,
• Dechlorinated swimming pool water, and
• Street wash water.
• Discharges from dewatering activities, if managed by appropriate controls as specified in
a project’s SMPP, erosion and sediment control plan, or stormwater management plan.
4.3.2.3 Prohibited Discharges
It is noted the following non-stormwater discharges are prohibited by the ILR40 permit:
• Concrete and wastewater from washout of concrete (unless managed by an appropriate
control),
• Drywall compound,
• Wastewater from washout and cleanout of stucco
• Paint
• Form release oils
• Curing compounds and other construction materials
• Fuels
• Oils or other pollutants used in vehicle and equipment O&M,
• Soaps, solvents, or detergents,
• Toxic or hazardous substances from a spill or other release
• Any other pollutant that could cause or tend to cause water pollution
Appendix C provides a description of pollutant indicators. This description is adapted from New
Hampshire Estuaries Project and the IDDE Guidance Manual by the CWP.
51
4.3.3 Indirect Connection Program (BMP C.3)
Indirect connections are subtle connections, such as dumping or spillage of materials into storm
sewer drains. Flash dumping is a common type of indirect connection. Generally, indirect modes
of entry produce intermittent or transitory discharges, with the exception of groundwater seepage.
There are five main modes of indirect entry for discharges.
Upon observing or receiving notification of a potential illicit discharge, the Illicit Discharge
Incident Tracking Form, found in Appendix D, is used to log and investigate the incident.
Appropriate procedures found within this Section are implemented in the event an illicit discharge
has been confirmed.
Measurable Goal:
• Track efforts related to indirect illicit discharges.
4.3.3.1 Groundwater Seepage
Seepage discharges can be either continuous or intermittent, depending on the depth of the water
table and the season. Groundwater seepage usually consists of relatively clean water that is not an
illicit discharge by itself, but can mask other illicit discharges. If storm drains are located close to
sanitary sewers, groundwater seepage may intermingle with diluted sewage. Addressing seepage
that is observed during the outfall screening process is described in more detail in this Subsection.
4.3.3.2 Spills
These transitory discharges occur when a spill travels across an impervious surface and enters a
storm drain inlet. Spills can occur at many industrial, commercial and transport-related sites. A
very common example is an oil or gas spill from an accident that then travels across the road and
into the storm drain system. The Spill Response Plan is described in Subsection 4.6.2.
4.3.3.3 Dumping
Dumping a liquid into a storm drain inlet: This type of transitory discharge is created when liquid
wastes such as oil, grease, paint, solvents, and various automotive fluids are dumped into the storm
drain. Liquid dumping occurs intermittently at sites that improperly dispose of rinse water and wash
water during maintenance and cleanup operations. A common example is cleaning deep fryers in
the parking lot of fast food operations. The Storm Drain Stenciling, Household Hazardous Wastes,
Vehicle Fluid Maintenance and Pool Dewatering programs are designed to minimize dumping;
these programs were previously described in Subsection 4.1. The procedure for handling a
dumping incident is described in Subsection 4.6.2.
4.3.3.4 Outdoor washing activities
Outdoor washing may or may not be an illicit discharge, depending on the nature of the generating
site that produces the wash water. For example, hosing off individual sidewalks and driveways may
not generate significant flows or pollutant loads. On the other hand, routine washing of fueling
areas, outdoor storage areas, and parking lots (power washing), and construction equipment
cleanouts may result in unacceptable pollutant loads. Individual washing activities are addressed
through the Public Education and Outreach Program in Subsection 4.1, whereas
52
observed/documented routine washing activities should be addressed through the Removal of Illicit
Discharges Procedure in Subsection 4.3.4.4.
4.3.3.5 Non-target irrigation from landscaping or lawns
Irrigation can produce intermittent discharges from over-watering or misdirected sprinklers that
send tap water over impervious areas. In some instances, non-target irrigation can produce
unacceptable loads of nutrients, organic matter or pesticides. The most common example is a
discharge from commercial landscaping areas adjacent to parking lots connected to the storm drain
system. This type of discharge is addressed by the Public Education and Outreach Program in
Subsection 4.1.9.
4.3.4 Direct Connection Illicit Discharge Program (BMP C.3 – C.8)
Direct connections enter through direct piping connections to the storm sewer system, and since
direct connections exist regardless of whether or not a stormwater event (e.g. rain or melting snow)
is occurring, they are most easily detected during dry-weather periods. Inspection of stormwater
outfalls during dry-weather conditions reveals whether non-stormwater flows exist. If non-
stormwater flows are observed, they can be screened and tested to determine whether pollutants
are present. If the presence of pollutants is indicated, the detective work of identifying the source
of the discharge can begin. Once the source is identified, it can then be corrected. A direct
connection illicit discharge program consists of three principal components: 1) outfall inspection,
and 2) follow-up investigation and 3) removal.
4.3.4.1 Program Planning
Program Planning involves the office work, planning, and organization required to conduct outfall
screening and follow-up investigative activities of the program. This includes the identification of
the staffing and equipment needed to conduct the outfall screening and scheduling inspection
activities. Program planning also identifies the regulatory authority to remove directly connected
illicit discharges and the identification of the outfalls and receiving waters in the municipality (both
discussed earlier in this Subsection).
Staffing - Personnel for an outfall inspection screening program are required for program
administration, effort for conducting the outfall screening, and any follow-up investigations.
Typically, a two-member crew is required for the outfall screening and follow-up portions of the
program.
Equipment Needs - General field equipment and specialized outfall screening equipment are
required for IDDE programs. The method of collecting and managing inspection screening data is
driven by available technology. A complete list of recommend equipment and supplies is found
on the Stormwater Outfall Screening Equipment Checklist (Appendix E). Field Crews carry basic
safety items, such as cell phones, surgical gloves, and first aid kits. Additional safety precautions
are described following the Equipment Checklist.
Scheduling - Perform all pre-screening and follow-up inspections preceding a dry-weather period,
a period of 72 hours of dry weather. A period of 72 hours is selected to allow local detention
facilities to drain and local groundwater flows to recede after precipitation events. However, some
judgment may be exercised in evaluating the 72-hour period to sampling. For example, if very
light rain or drizzle occurred and no runoff was experienced, it is likely that dry-weather conditions
would exist and outfall inspection could be conducted.
53
Pre-Screening - Pre-screening is on-going, in coordination with the outfall inventory, refer to
Subsection 4.3.4.2. High priority dry weather flow locations will be identified in 2016, in
accordance with the new ILR40 permit. It is recommended that all outfalls be re-screened in 2022
and every 5 years thereafter.
Pre-screening should generally take place during the late summer or fall months, ideally in August,
September, or October, although other summer months may be acceptable, depending on weather
conditions. This time period is generally warm, which improves field efficiency as well as
reliability and consistency of field-testing. This time period is also more likely to have extended
dry periods with little or no precipitation, which is required for the inspection activities.
Outfall Inspections - Upon completion of the pre-screening efforts, review collected data to identify
outfalls with observed dry weather flow or other indicators of an illicit discharge, refer to
Subsection 4.3.4.2. Schedule outfall inspections so that all identified outfalls with potential illicit
discharges are investigated within the following 5-years, ensuring that outfalls with the greatest
potential for the presence of an illicit discharge are investigated first. Annual inspection of all high
priority outfalls, as identified in Subsection 1.3.1, is required.
4.3.4.2 Outfall Inspection (BMP C.3)
The identification of potential illicit discharge locations is primarily a two part process, pre-
screening and follow-up inspections. Pre-screening is performed by a rapid inspection of all
outfalls in a pre-determined area such as along a receiving water. Follow-up inspections are
required for those pipes found to have dry weather flow. Once probable illicit discharges are found,
identify the sources of illicit discharges and correct per the removal procedure of Subsection
4.3.4.4. Outfall inspection consists of the following tasks:
(1) Pre-Screening
(2) Outfall Inspection, and
(3) Outfall Assessment and Documentation.
Pre-Screening - Pre-screening consists of a rapid inspection of outfalls, during dry weather flow
conditions. During pre-screening basic information should be obtained for each outfall.
Recommended information includes basic data about the structure (such as size, shape, material,
condition), presence of dry weather flow determination and a photograph. The Outfall Inventory
was previously described in Subsection 1.3.1.
Measurable Goal:
• Pre-screen outfalls and search for new outfalls, repeat every five years.
Outfall Inspection - An outfall inspection is required for those outfalls identified during pre-
screening inspections with dry weather flow or other indicators of a potential illicit discharge. The
intent is to gather additional information to determine if an illicit discharge is present. Upon
arriving at an outfall, the field crew should inspect the outfall by approaching the outfall on foot to
a proximity that allows for visual observations to be made. Outfalls should be screened to
determine which one of the three following conditions applies:
• The outfall is dry or damp with no observed flow,
54
• Flowing discharges are observed from the outfall, or
• The outfall is partially or completely submerged with no observed flow or is inaccessible.
The field crew should photograph the outfall and complete applicable sections of the Storm Water
Outfall Inspection Data Form (Appendix F). The need for on-site testing and obtaining grab
samples for laboratory analysis is determined by using the flow chart as guidance. Testing results
are used to identify potential sources. Instructions for Completing the Storm Water Outfall
Inspection Data Form and an associated Outfall Inspection Procedure Flow Chart (used to identify
applicable sections of the form that must be filled out) are included in Appendix F. Initial testing
results are NOT intended to document the event for future removal and/or enforcement actions. If
the initial testing results identify a potential illicit discharge, proceed to the follow-up investigation
procedures discussed in Subsection 4.3.4.3.
Locating an upstream sampling point may be required if any of the following conditions exist at an
outfall:
• The outfall discharge is submerged or partially submerged due to backwater
conditions,
• Site access and safety considerations prevent sample collection,
• Other special considerations.
Make reasonable efforts to location upstream sampling location(s) using the available storm sewer
atlas and development plan information. Manholes, catch basins, or culvert crossings can be used
for upstream sampling locations. If no dry weather flow is present (i.e. the submerged outfall is
based solely on a backwater condition, follow the above Scenario 1 procedure. If dry weather flow
is identified in an upstream manhole, follow the above Scenario 2 procedure. If the upstream
manhole(s) are inaccessible, resolve the problem in the office with appropriate supervisory
personnel.
Measurable Goal:
• Inspect outfalls identified during pre-screening inspections with dry weather flow or other
indicators of a potential illicit discharge over a 5-year period.
• Inspect all high priority outfalls, as identified in Subsection 1.3.1 annually.
Outfall Assessment and Documentation - Complete the Storm Water Outfall Inspection Data Form
(Appendix F) for all outfall screening and grab sampling activities. All completed forms must be
dated, legible, and contain accurate documentation of each outfall inspection. A separate data form
must be completed for each outfall. It is recommended that non-smearing pens be used to complete
the forms and that all data be objective and factual. Once completed, these data forms are
considered accountable documents and are maintained as part of the municipality’s files. In
addition to standard information, the data form is used to record other information that is noted at
the time the outfall inspection is conducted. For example, observations of dead or dying plants,
fish kills, algal blooms (excessive algae growth), construction activities, and other activities that
might provide information regarding the potential for illicit connections or inappropriate discharges
should be recorded on the form.
55
Measurable Goal:
• Document all outfall inspections.
4.3.4.3 Follow-Up Investigation and Program Evaluation (BMP C.4)
Follow-up investigation and program evaluation will entail the following steps:
1. Review inspection results.
2. Conduct detailed storm sewer investigation.
3. Conduct tracing.
4. Removal of inappropriate discharges.
5. Program evaluation.
Measurable Goal:
• Continue investigation for outfalls identified through outfall inspection efforts to have a
potential illicit discharge.
Outfall Screening Results Review and Assessment - Follow up inspections are required for outfalls
identified to have potential illicit discharges during the outfall inspection procedure. This is
accomplished by reviewing the Stormwater Outfall Inspection Data Forms (Appendix F) collected
during outfall investigations to determine which outfalls require a follow up investigation, target
sewer system areas (using available mapping and atlas information) for detailed investigation.
Independent Verification - If the initial outfall assessment identifies potential illicit discharges
(through either the on-site of off-site testing procedures), additional sampling is required. The
results of the inspection and testing should be discussed with the Stormwater Coordinator. Contract
an independent laboratory to take and test an additional sample and verify preliminary finding. Use
the established procedure to coordinate the independent laboratory sample and testing.
Source Identification - Follow up investigation is required for all outfalls with positive indicators
for pollutant discharges during the pre-screening efforts.
Mapping and Evaluation (BMP C.1) - For each outfall to be investigated, a large-scale working
map should be obtained (digitally or in paper form) that includes the entire upstream storm sewer
network, outfall locations and parcel boundaries indicated. This map product is based on
information from the storm sewer atlas and outfall inventory. Land use information is evaluated to
determine the types of residential, commercial, and industrial areas that might contribute the type
of pollution identified at the outfall. An attempt is then made to match detected indicators with
upstream activities.
Storm Sewer Investigation - After conducting the mapping evaluation, a manhole-by-manhole
inspection is conducted to pinpoint the location of the inappropriate discharge, into the storm sewer
/ conveyance system. This inspection requires a field crew to revisit the outfall where the polluted
dry-weather discharge was detected. The field crew should be equipped with the same testing and
safety equipment and follow similar procedures as used during the outfall inspection.
56
After confirming that dry-weather flow is present at the outfall, the field crew continues moving to
the next upstream manhole or access point investigating for dry weather flow. In cases where more
than one source of dry-weather discharge enters a manhole, the field crew records this information
on the screening form and then tracks each source separately. All sources are tracked upstream,
manhole-by-manhole, until the dry-weather discharge is no longer detected. Finally, the last
manhole where dry-weather flow is present is identified and potential sources to that manhole are
accessed. This data is important for source identification.
The field crew should also determine whether there has been a significant change in the flow rate
between manholes. If the flow rate appears to have changed between two manholes in the system,
the illicit connection likely occurs between the two manholes. Changes in the concentration of
pollutant parameters could also aid in confirming the presence of an illicit connection between the
two manholes.
Tracing - Once the manhole inspection has identified the reach area, between two manholes
suspected of containing an inappropriate discharge, testing may be necessary. If there is only one
possible source to this section of the storm sewer system in the area, source identification and
follow-up for corrective action is straightforward. Multiple sources, or non-definitive sources, may
require additional evaluation and testing in order to identify the contributing source. The method
of testing must be approved by the PWD Director prior to testing. Potential testing methods include
fluorometric dye testing, smoke testing, and/or remote video inspections. Once identified, clearly
log the contributing source.
4.3.4.4 Removal of Illicit Discharges (BMP C.5)
Removal of illicit discharge connections is required at all identified contributing sources. The
following eight steps are taken to definitively identify and remove an inappropriate discharge to
the storm sewer system:
Step 1. Have an outside laboratory service take a grab sample and test for the illicit
discharge at the manhole located immediately downstream of the suspected
discharge connection.
Step 2: Conduct an internal meeting with appropriate personnel including Public Works
Personnel, Public Works Director, Building Department Code Enforcement
Officer, and Stormwater Coordinator to discuss inspection and testing results and
remedial procedures.
Step 3: The Public Works Administration shall send a notification letter to the
owner/operator of the property/site suspected of discharging a pollutant. The letter
should request that the owner/operator describe the activities on the site and the
possible sources of non-stormwater discharges including information regarding the
use and storage of hazardous substances, chemical storage practices, materials
handling and disposal practices, storage tanks, types of permits, and pollution
prevention plans.
Step 4: Arrange a meeting for an inspection of the property with Public Works Personnel,
the Building Department Code Enforcement Officer, and the owner/operator of the
property where the pollution source is suspected. Most illicit connections and
improper disposal can probably be detected during this step. Notify the site
owner/operator of the problem and instruct them to take corrective measures.
57
Step 5: Conduct additional tests as necessary if the initial site inspection is not successful
in identifying the source of the problem. The Public Works Director is responsible
for determining the appropriate testing measure to pinpoint the source.
Step 6: If the owner/operator does not voluntarily initiate corrective action, the Building
Department Code Enforcement Office issues a notification of noncompliance. The
notification includes a description of the required action(s) a time frame in which
to assess the problem and take corrective action. Upon notification of
noncompliance, the owner can be subject to any penalties stipulated in the IDDE
Ordinance.
Step 7: Conduct follow-up inspections after stipulated time frame has elapsed to determine
whether corrective actions have been implemented to: 1) remove the illicit
connection or 2) eliminate the improper disposal practice.
Step 8: If corrective actions have been completed (i.e. and the illicit discharge has been
eliminated) the Public Works Administration sends a notification of compliance
letter to the owner/operator of the property/site suspected of discharging a
pollutant.
If corrective actions have not been completed an additional internal meeting with
appropriate municipal) personnel (likely including involved Public Works
Personnel, Public Works Director, Building Department Code Enforcement
Officer, and Stormwater Coordinator) is held to determine appropriate steps to
obtain compliance. Appropriate actions may include monetary or other penalties.
Note, the City of Lake Forest may abbreviate and or circumvent this eight step process in order to
address illicit discharges that are believed to be creating a condition of imminent hazard or harm
to human health and/or the environment.
Measurable Goal:
• Administer Removal Procedures for outfalls with illicit discharges.
4.4 Construction Site Runoff Control
4.4.1 Regulatory Program (BMP D.1)
In addition to the QLP efforts described in Subsection 3.4, the City of Lake Forest has adopted the
WDO and is currently a Certified Community for the review, permitting, inspection and
enforcement of the provisions of the WDO. The community designates an Enforcement Officer;
this person is responsible for the administration and enforcement of the WDO. The City of Lake
Forest has created an Inspection and Violation Notification Procedure to ensure compliance with
the WDO.
Measurable Goal:
• Support QLP efforts
• Enforce WDO
58
4.4.2 Responsible Parties (BMP D.1)
4.4.2.1 Applicant
The applicant is ultimately responsible for ensuring compliant soil erosion and sediment control
measures on-site during construction. General contractors, sub-contractors and other hired
employees of the applicant can assist the applicant in maintaining a compliant site; however the
applicant remains the responsible party. The applicant is also responsible for obtaining all other
required state and federal permits, including an NOI with IEPA and upholding all permit conditions
(including completing inspection logs).
4.4.2.2 DECI – Designated Inspectors
As previously described in Subsection 3.4.1, the purpose of the DECI program is to facilitate
positive communication between the City of Lake Forest and the permit holder by creating a single
point of contact for soil erosion/sediment control issues with the idea that it is easier to prevent soil
erosion and sediment control problems than it is to correct them after they have occurred. Further,
the program is intended to improve site conditions, minimize environmental impacts, and educate
contractors/developers/inspectors about proper soil erosion/sediment control BMPs.
The applicant, for sites that exceed the WDO thresholds per §601, is required to hire or employ a
DECI.
• All development with 10 acres or more of hydrologic disturbance
• All development with 1 acre or more of hydrologic disturbance and regulatory
floodplain or wetlands on site or on adjoining properties.
The DECI can work for the permittee's contractor, subcontractor, consultant, etc. He does not have
to be a direct employee of the permittee. SMC keeps a list of DECIs that have been approved.
The DECI has the responsibility to conduct inspections as required, document inspections, keep
inspections and project plans available on site, report noncompliance issues promptly, recommend
soil erosion/sediment control measures. Assuming the DECI is competently completing these
steps, the DECI is considered to meet the requirements of the program. Ultimately, liability for a
development in noncompliance may fall to the owner, the applicant, the contractor, the developer,
the DECI, or anyone else involved as determined on a case by case basis.
Sites that do not require a DECI may still require a designated inspector under the NPDES II permit
process. Significant efforts have been made to minimize overlap between the two programs.
Currently all sites with greater than 1 acre or more of hydrologic disturbance require a permit from
IEPA and a designated inspector (which is more stringent than the DECI requirements). A
designated inspector, under the IEPA program, does not need to be a DECI recognized by SMC;
however a DECI can fulfill both rolls. However, the site inspection logs can typically meet the
permit conditions of both the WDO and the IEPA.
The DECI reports to the Enforcement Officer. However, SMC administers the DECI program.
During the course of a project, the DECI must notify the Enforcement Officer within any if the
development site is determined to be noncompliant with the soil erosion and sediment control plan.
59
The City of Lake Forest’s Stormwater Coordinator should also be contacted within 24-hours. It is
highly recommended that the Stormwater Coordinator remind the DECI to also file an ION with
IEPA. If the discharge from the construction site enters a receiving water within the MS4
jurisdictional boundaries, it is highly recommended that the MS4 also file an ION with IEPA.
4.4.2.3 Enforcement Officer
It is also both the right and the responsibility of the Enforcement Officer to ensure that all
incidences of non-compliance received from a DECI are resolved. Furthermore it is the
Enforcement Officer's right and the responsibility to notify the SMC if a DECI listed by SMC is
not adequately performing the DECI responsibilities. SMC may remove a DECI from the approved
DECI list. However, a DECI may be removed from a development by the Enforcement Officer at
their sole discretion.
4.4.2.4 Municipal Contact – Stormwater Coordinator
The City of Lake Forest has the responsibility to designate a contact with both the SMC and the
IEPA. The City of Lake Forest has designated the Water and Sewer Supervisor to fulfill both roles.
SMC refers to this person as their community contact. The community contact provides support
and coordinates with SMC on development related activities within the community. The IEPA
considers this person the Stormwater Coordinator - Subsection 2.2.1 provides additional
information regarding the role of the Stormwater Coordinator.
4.4.3 Erosion and Sediment Control BMPs (BMP D.2)
As described in the QLP section above, the site plan is required to comply with minimum prescribed
practice requirements set forth in the WDO. The WDO also allows for the City of Lake Forest to
require additional measures, above and beyond MCMs, to prevent the discharge pollutants from
construction sites.
Measurable Goal:
• Support QLP efforts
• Enforce WDO
4.4.4 Construction Site Waste Control (BMP D.3)
As described in the QLP section, the WDO includes appropriate waste control provisions.
Measurable Goal:
• Support QLP efforts
• Enforce WDO
4.4.5 Site Plan Review (BMP D.4, E.4)
The City of Lake Forest is a certified community for the enforcement of the Stormwater Provisions
of the WDO. Applicants are directed to Engineering Department for information pertaining to the
permitting process. Developments that exceed the WDO minimum thresholds are provided with a
WDO application form. Applicants submit the completed form and supporting documentation to
the Engineering Department for review and comment. The Engineering Department performs a
60
review of the proposed site plan and provides comments to the applicant on any plan deficiencies
and/or recommended plan enhancements. The plan review also assists in identifying other
approvals that the applicant may be required to obtain. The permit is issued once all applicable
provisions of the WDO have been addressed. The permit lists any additional conditions that are
applicable for the development, including providing prior notification of the pre-construction
meeting to the City of Lake Forest or SMC. Attendance of the pre-construction meeting shall be
made a condition of the permit for all major developments. The applicant is required to post the
permit at the construction site.
Measurable Goal:
• Support QLP efforts
• Enforce WDO
4.4.6 Site Inspection Procedures (BMP D.6, E.5)
WDO provisions are described in the QLP section above. Representatives of the City of Lake
Forest are authorized to enter upon any land or water to inspect development activity and to verify
the existing conditions of a development site that is under permit review.
The City of Lake Forest may inspect site development at any stage in the construction process.
Site Inspection Process:
• The City of Lake Forest or SMC attends the pre-construction meeting on applicable
development sites. Complete the Pre-Construction Meeting Form (Appendix G). It is also
recommended that the inspector request to see the SMPP and IEPA NOI for applicable
construction sites.
• The applicant notifies the City of Lake Forest or SMC when initial sediment and runoff
controls measures have been installed.
• The City of Lake Forest or SMC inspects the initial sediment and runoff control measures
and authorizes the start of general construction.
• The City of Lake Forest or SMC inspects the stormwater management system and
authorizes additional site improvement activities.
• The City of Lake Forest or SMC performs site inspections at the recommended intervals
listed above and completes the Soil Erosion Sediment Control (SE/SC) Inspection Form
(Appendix H).
• For sites that exceed the WDO thresholds per §601 a DECI is required, refer to Subsection
4.4.2.2 for additional information regarding the program.
• The City of Lake Forest or SMC requires as-built documentation of the stormwater
management system prior to final site stabilization. Tags of the seed mixes are kept by the
developer for inspection and approval. Upon approval of the as-builts, the applicant shall
permanently stabilize the site.
Measurable Goal:
• Support QLP efforts
• Enforce WDO
61
4.4.7 Public Information Handling Procedures (BMP D.5)
The QLP has established a CIRS which processes both citizen and agency inquiries. Additionally,
the Community frequently receives phone calls regarding a development, either during the review
or construction phase. Both site design and construction related phone calls are directed to the
Enforcement Officer, or designee. Site design comments are handled on a case by case basis.
Construction related calls are typically addressed by performing a site inspection.
Measurable Goal:
• Support QLP CIRS efforts
• Enforce WDO
4.4.8 Performance Guarantees (BMP D.6)
Pre-construction meeting – No deposit required.
Performance Guarantee (surety) is required for public improvements (i.e. sewer, water, right-of-
way work), stormwater management system and landscaping. The Engineers Opinion of Probable
Construction Cost (EOPCC) is provided to City of Lake Forest for review/approval. The required
surety amount shall be 110% of the approved EOPCC. In cases where the SMC requires a surety
the Community will only hold a surety for the portions of the EOPCC that is not being held by
SMC. Alternatively, the Community will provide SMC with a letter indicating that the City of
Lake Forest will hold the surety and not reduce the surety amount until SMC approval has been
obtained.
The City of Lake Forest will hold 10% of the surety for a minimum of 1-yr after site stabilization
is complete, and as-built drawings are accepted, to ensure that the vegetation is established and no
failures occur. For sites with native vegetation, this portion of the surety will be held for a minimum
of 3-yr after site stabilization.
Measurable Goal:
• Enforce WDO
4.4.9 Violation Notification Procedures (BMP B.6)
In general the compliance due date should be within 5-working days. However, if the inspector
determines that the violation is or will result in significant environmental, health or safety hazards
a 24-hour due date should be set. For time-critical violations, the developer should also be advised
to complete an ION report with IEPA for all sites that were required to obtain a n NOI with IEPA.
If the discharge from the construction site enters a receiving water within the MS4 jurisdictional
boundaries, it is highly recommended that the MS4 also file an ION with IEPA. The SE/SC
Inspection Form is found in Appendix H. The violation procedure is included in Appendix I along
with a sample letter of violation.
Measurable Goal:
• Enforce WDO
62
4.5 Post Construction Runoff Control
The City of Lake Forest complies with NDPES permit requirements by incorporating Ordinance
and BMP standards to minimize the discharge of pollutants of development projects. This
Subsection describes how the compliance with stormwater discharge permit requirements for long-
term post-construction practices that protect water quality and control runoff flow is achieved.
This SMPP creates and references extensive policies and procedures for regulating design and
construction activities for protecting receiving waters. The design and construction site practices
selected and implemented by the responsible party for a given site are expected to meet BMP
measures described through the Lake County Technical Reference Manual and IEPA’s Program
recommendations. All proposed permanent stormwater treatment practices must be reviewed and
approved by the Enforcement Officer.
4.5.1 Regulatory Program (BMP E.2)
As described in the QLP section, the WDO includes numerous performance standards on Grading,
Stormwater and Soil Erosion/Sediment Control that must be met for all parties undertaking
construction. The Lake County Technical Reference Manual is a guidance tool that describes BMP
and implementation procedures for enforcing the WDO.
Measurable Goal:
• Support QLP efforts
• Enforce WDO
4.5.2 Long Term Operation and Maintenance (BMP E.3)
As described in the QLP section, the WDO requires that maintenance plans be developed for all
stormwater management systems designed to serve major developments. The SMPP includes two
long term maintenance plans. These sample maintenance plans are included in Appendix J.
• The first plan is the recommended plan for existing detention and stormwater management
facilities, whether publicly or privately maintained. The intent of this sample plan is to
provide guidance for the maintenance of facilities that do not have an approved plan. If an
existing facility already has an adequate plan; this document would supersede the sample
plan. Attempts should be made to provide the sample maintenance plan to pre-WDO sites
with stormwater management facilities.
• The second plan is provided to applicants during the permit review period. This plan
should be reviewed and enhanced by the applicant to reflect the sites specific design.
Receipt of the signed and recorded maintenance plan is required prior to issuance of the
Watershed Development Permit (WDP) or listed as a permit condition.
Measurable Goal:
• Support QLP efforts
• Enforce WDO
• Allow for public submission of concerns related to post-construction stormwater runoff
control. Follow-up with concerns as appropriate.
63
4.5.3 Runoff Volume Reduction Hierarchy (BMP E.4)
Developments that exceed the thresholds identified in the WDO are required to quantify the RVR
provided by the site design. The Community recommends that projects be designed to effectively
capture 85% of the average annual rainfall events, as documented in Appendix O of the WDO
Measurable Goal:
• Support QLP efforts
• Enforce WDO
4.5.4 Watershed Plans (BMP E.7)
SMC has collaborated on a number of watershed based plans throughout the County as described
in Subsection 3.7. The City of Lake Forest will adopt watershed plans that extend into its corporate
limits and review recommended individual site-specific projects and programmatic actions. The
City of Lake Forest encourages private property owners to implement the recommendations.
Implementation of recommendations by the MS4 will be evaluated on a yearly basis as part of its
fiscal planning/budgeting process keeping in mind that ONLY the implementation of individual
site-specific projects or programmatic actions WITHOUT the use of 319 funding can be cited by
an MS4 community toward meeting ILR40 permitting requirements.
Measurable Goals:
• Encourage private property owners to implement watershed plan recommendations
• Evaluate feasibility of implementing watershed plan recommendations as part of its fiscal
planning/budgeting process.
4.5.5 Site Inspections (BMP E.6)
The inspection program for its general facilities is discussed in detail in Subsection 4.6.1. The
inspection procedure for site inspections during construction is described in Subsection 4.4.6.
This section focuses on post-construction inspections of previously developed sites, streambanks /
shorelines, streambeds, and detention / retention ponds.
4.5.5.1 Shorelines, Streambanks and Stream Bed Sediment Accumulation
As described previously in Subsection 3.7, SMC has collaborated on a number of watershed based
plans throughout the County. The Chicago River North Branch Watershed Plan included a stream
and detention basin inventory, as depicted in Figure 8 on the following page. The plans also include
a list of site specific BMPs within the community based on an assessment of these
64
FIGURE 8 - SMC STREAM AND DETENTION BASIN INVENTORY STATUS
inventories and other data. Project categories typically include problem discharge locations,
problem hydrologic impediments, stream buffers, logjam-debris removal, streambank stabilization
and shoreline stabilization. The MS4 encourages private property owners to implement the
recommendations. Implementation of recommendations by the City of Lake Forest will be
evaluated on a yearly basis as part of its fiscal planning/budgeting process, keeping in mind that
ONLY the implementation of individual site-specific projects or programmatic actions WITHOUT
the use of 319 funding can be cited by an MS4 community toward meeting ILR40 permitting
requirements.
For those areas of the community not evaluated as part of a watershed plan, the community will
inspect streambanks and lake shorelines as part of their periodic outfall pre-inventory and pre-
screening process. Within the City of Lake Forest, this includes the Bluff/Ravine Watershed. The
2017 Ravine Inspection Program implemented by the City of Lake Forest documented observed
erosion and/or sediment accumulation. Remedial actions might include notifying the property
owner or including maintenance activities in the work program.
Measurable Goals:
• Encourage private property owners to recommended retrofits cited in adopted watershed
plan(s).
65
• Evaluate feasibility of implementing retrofits cited in adopted watershed plan(s) as part of
fiscal planning/budgeting process.
• Inspect streambanks and lake shorelines as part of their periodic outfall pre-inventory and
pre-screening process and recommend remedial actions as appropriate.
4.5.5.2 Detention / Retention Pond
Previously inventoried detention basins - The City of Lake Forest encourages private property
owners to implement the detention basin and discharge structure retrofits recommended in the
Chicago River North Branch watershed plan. Implementation by the MS4, of recommendations,
will be evaluated on a yearly basis as part of its fiscal planning/budgeting process, keeping in mind
that ONLY the implementation of individual site-specific projects or programmatic actions
WITHOUT the use of 319 funding can be cited by an MS4 community toward meeting ILR40
permitting requirements.
Other detention basins - Portions of the community are located outside of watershed planning
areas. Attempts to inspect approximately 20% of all un-assessed properties with stormwater
management facilities a year; resulting in a re-occurrence inspection interval of every 5-years.
Inspect the shorelines of these detention basins in the spring and/or fall pending weather conditions
(with a goal of inspecting all un-assessed ponds once every 5 years). Observed erosion, seeding/re-
seeding or slope stabilization needs are documented. A ranking system has been established to
identify ponds that would most benefit from a retrofit or other enhancements.
1. Turf, obstructed or other deficiencies
2. Turf, unobstructed
3. Rock
4. Native, obstructed or other deficiencies
5. Native, unobstructed
6. Turf, recreational
Typical BMP for maintenance of these areas are similar to those for a construction site. SMC’s
streambank/shoreline stabilization manual is used as a starting point in choosing the appropriate
BMP for remediation activities. Remedial actions might include notifying the property owner of
recommended maintenance activity, deficiencies or additional enhancements or including
maintenance activities in the City of Lake Forest's work program. Recommendations will take into
consideration potential impacts and effects due to climate change.
Measurable Goals:
• Encourage private property owners to implement detention basin and discharge structure
retrofits cited in adopted watershed plan(s).
• Evaluate feasibility of detention basin and discharge structure retrofits cited in adopted
watershed plan(s) as part of fiscal planning/budgeting process.
• Inspect approximately 20% of all un-assessed stormwater management facilities and
recommend remedial actions as appropriate.
66
4.6 Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping
The City of Lake Forest is responsible for the care and upkeep of the general facilities, municipal
roads, its general facilities and associated maintenance yards. Many maintenance activities are
most regularly performed directly by staff; however from time to time contractors are employed to
perform specific activities. This Subsection describes how compliance with permit requirements
is achieved by incorporating pollution prevention and good housekeeping stormwater quality
management into day-to-day operations. On-going education and training is provided to ensure
that all of its employees have the knowledge and skills necessary to perform their functions
effectively and efficiently.
4.6.1 Inspection and Maintenance Program (BMPs F.2 – F.4)
This subsection presents a schedule for developing a Pollution Prevention Inspection and
Maintenance Plan (I&M Plan). This Plan will address the various housekeeping BMPs which
comprise the City's Housekeeping Program; this program is described in the remainder of this
Subsection.
4.6.1.1 Schedule
The City of Lake Forest will conduct an inventory of exterior storage areas and other operations
that could impact storm water quality associated with all municipally owned properties. This
inventory will be completed in calendar year 2018.
Upon completion, a schedule for regular inspection of any areas of outdoor storage that possess the
potential for stormwater impacts will be developed. This schedule will be in addition to any
existing inspection procedures currently conducted by the City, for example under the Spill
Prevention Countermeasure and Control (SPCC) Plan currently utilized by the Vehicle
Maintenance Garage (Subsection 4.6.2). This inspection protocol will include procedures for
corrective action and follow up. In addition, recommendations will be made for placing storm
water controls to avoid exposure via moving storage indoors, building shelters to prevent storm
water exposure and/or providing secondary containment and control devices to reduce or eliminate
potentially contaminated storm water discharge.
Measurable Goal for all of 4.6.1:
• Conduct and Implement I&M Plan
• Implement the SMPP.
4.6.1.2 Housekeeping BMPs
The City of Lake Forest’s Housekeeping Program addresses the following activities/areas that
require inspection and their inspection frequency. It further details maintenance activities and
subsequent tracking procedures for each of the tasks.
• Street Sweeping Operations
• Drainageways
• Landscape Maintenance
• Snow Removal and Ice Control
• Pet Waste
• Vehicle and Equipment Operations
67
• Animal Nuisance Control
• Waste Management
• Water Conservation and Irrigation
• Green Infrastructure
• Special Events
4.6.1.3 Street Sweeping
Street sweeping operations are performed to reduce potential illicit discharges and to provide a
clean environment. The curb lines of all streets are cleaned on a rotating basis. The rotation maybe
changed or interrupted. Each street is typically swept/cleaned approximately 2 to 4 times per year.
Sweeper waste is collected and disposed of in the spoil waste area. The intended frequency of
street sweeping operations is as follows:
• December to April – no sweeping due to winter operations/conditions
• April to June – as needed
• June to September – as needed
• September to December – daily (due to falling leaves the sweeping operations are assisted
by a dump truck to increase the speed of operations).
4.6.1.4 Drainageways
Drainageways include any river, stream, creek, brook, branch, natural or artificial depression,
ponded area, lakes, flowage, slough, ditch, conduit, culvert, gully, ravine, swale, wash, or natural
or man-made drainageway, in or into which surface or groundwater flows, either perennially or
intermittently. Primary drainageways are described in Subsection 1.4. Minor drainageways
include roadside and side yard swales, overland flow paths, pond outlets, etc.
Driveway Culverts - Maintenance and replacement of driveway culverts is the property owner’s
responsibility. A minimum 12” diameter culvert is required per Code. Permits are required for
culvert replacement; a soil erosion and sediment control plan may be required as part of the permit.
The Engineering Department inspects the culvert after backfilling has occurred.
Catch Basins - Catch basin locations are identified on the Storm Sewer Atlas. The goal is to
annually clean approximately 20% of all catch basins, to a minimum sump depth of 2 feet. If catch
basin debris is at the invert elevation of the downstream pipe (i.e. has completely filled the sump
area), then the downstream storm sewer system is also cleaned. Likewise, if a water main break or
other heavy flow occurs that flushes potential illicit discharges into the storm sewer system, the
receiving storm sewer lines are inspected and then cleaned as necessary. Spoil waste obtained from
catch basin cleaning is disposed of in the spoil waste area. Locations of cleaned catch basins are
tracked.
Catch basins found to have structural deficiencies are noted. Necessary remedial actions are
completed or incorporated into a capital project.
Other Inlet and Grate Cleaning - Cleaning of these areas occurs on an as-needed basis (e.g.,
complaints, incidences, standing water, etc.). Spoil waste that is obtained from inlet and grate
68
cleaning or vacuuming is disposed of at the Municipal Services Building. Any waste jetted out is
picked up with a clapper bar if possible.
Swales and Overland Flow Paths - The ravine assessment program described under Subsection
5.1.2 will be used to document and assess conditions of accelerated erosion or sediment
accumulation, along with recommendations for corrective action via habitat restoration activities
that may be performed by the City, its collaborative stakeholders and/or other interested parties.
Data gathered from this assessment program will be shared with the SMC to further their own
efforts to assess and evaluate these unique habitats.
For other areas of the City, Public Works employees who observe any other areas of significant
erosion / sedimentation concern during the normal course of their field duties, as well as during
specific inspections activities specified in the SMPP (e.g., dry weather inspections [Subsection
4.3.4.2] and monitoring activities [Subsection 5.1] will report such conditions to the Stormwater
Coordinator [Subsection 2.2.1]). These areas will be incorporated into a maintenance program.
Any observed areas of significant concern located on privately owned property will result in
notification of the property owner on an as needed basis for appropriate remediation.
Public Works workers will receive annual training in housekeeping protocols including the
procedures for reporting observed areas of concern to the Stormwater Coordinator.
4.6.1.5 Landscape Maintenance
Maintain general facilities, municipal roads, associated maintenance yards, and other public areas.
Municipal staff is responsible for control of litter and debris; this issue will also be addressed in
annual stormwater training.
A landscape contractor is selected to be responsible for the remainder of the landscape maintenance
program under the supervision of the Parks and Recreation Department. Landscape contractors are
required to meet ILR40 training requirements and ensure that they adhere to the SMPP.
Litter and Debris - Litter and debris can accumulate on City of Lake Forest property and roadway
right-of-ways and should be removed. Each Public Works Division is responsible for the cleanup
of their respective facilities. Clean-up at park and recreation areas is the responsibility of the Parks
and Recreation Department. Other properties and right-of-ways (including municipal, Township,
County and State right-of-ways within the MS4 limits) are cleaned by Public Works personnel or
volunteer groups on an as-needed basis.
Private Residence Yard Waste - Yard waste and leaves from private residences are collected
throughout the year by the city’s Sanitation Section. Yard waste is collected weekly throughout
the growing season. The Majority of leaf collection typically starts in October and runs for
approximately six weeks.
Fertilizers - The annual landscape contractor is required to be a licensed applicator for fertilizers.
The use of pesticides and fertilizers shall be managed in a way that minimizes the volume of storm
water runoff and pollutants.
69
4.6.1.6 Snow Removal and Ice Control
During snow removal and ice control activities, salt, de-icing chemicals, abrasives and snow melt
may pollute stormwater runoff. To address these potential pollutants, the following procedures for
the winter season (November 1 through May 1) are implemented.
The City of Lake Forest will participate in watershed groups, as identified by the QLP, organized
to implement control measures which will reduce chloride concentrations in receiving waters.
Roadway Ice Control - In effort to minimize the deleterious impacts of road salt to run-off,
receiving waters and adjacent habitats, the City of Lake Forest will use the minimal amount of salt,
de-icing chemicals and additives necessary for effective control. Prior to November 1, preparation
work to obtain seasonal readiness is typically completed. These tasks include: inspecting and re-
conditioning of spreaders and spinners, install these items onto snow removal vehicles, performing
test operations, applying salt in accordance with the City's Salt Reduction Program, and conducting
training. The completion of these preparatory tasks helps to ensure that only the necessary level of
salt is applied.
The City of Lake Forest will also consider the additional use of calcium chloride if the ambient
temperature is below 20-degrees Fahrenheit, to improve the efficiency of snow melting efforts, and
to incorporate pre-wetting and alternative deicing methods / materials if appropriate.
Salt delivery and storage - Steps are taken to ensure that the delivery, storage and distribution of
salt does not pollute stormwater runoff. The floor of the enclosed salt storage building, and adjacent
receiving/unloading area is constructed of impervious material. The limits of the salt pile will be
pushed back away from the door opening to minimize potential illicit runoff.
Snow plowing - Snow plowing activities direct snow off the pavement and onto the parkways to
reduce the amount of salt, chemical additives, abrasives or other pollutants that go directly into the
storm sewer system. When necessary, accumulated snow will be hauled to designated stockpile
locations. Snow blowing, plowing or dumping into drainageways is not allowed. Once the snow
has melted, the stockpile areas are cleaned with a street sweeper removing any debris deposited.
4.6.1.7 Vehicle and Equipment Operations
Vehicle and equipment fueling and maintenance are performed at the Municipal Services Fleet
Maintenance Garage. The garage employs procedures and practices are designed to minimize or
eliminate the discharge of pollutants to the stormwater management system, including receiving
waters.
Vehicle Washing - Vehicle washing, wheel wash water, and other wash waters must be treated in
a sediment basin or alternative control that provides equivalent or better treatment prior to
discharge. The City of Lake Forest has a dedicated wash bay in the fleet maintenance garage.
Vehicle Maintenance - Vehicle maintenance procedures and practices are designed to minimize
or eliminate the discharge of petroleum based pollutants to the stormwater management system,
including receiving waters. The proper handling and disposal of vehicle maintenance by-
products such as used oil, antifreeze, batteries and tires are addressed in 4.6.1.10 - Chemical, Oil
and Waste Management.
70
4.6.1.8 Animal Nuisance Control
Upon receiving notification, The City of Lake Forests collects “road kill” from right-of-way areas.
The carcasses are disposed of in the Public Works Complex garbage dumpsters.
4.6.1.9 Chemical, Oil and Waste Management (BMP F.4)
This BMP consists of implementing procedural and structural practices for handling, storing the
various chemical materials and petroleum and other oil-based products used by City of Lake Forest
operations in the course of conducting maintenance activities, as well as procedures and structural
practices for properly managing and disposing of wastes generated by maintenance activities. This
helps prevent the release of chemical, petroleum and waste materials into the stormwater
management system including receiving waters.
Chemical and Oil Storage and Use:
Maintenance activities involve the use of a variety of chemical and/or oil based products, including
fuels, solvents, lubricating oils, paints and coatings, and fertilizers. Improper storage, handling and
use of these materials can result in spills, fires or other accidents that can affect storm water and
receiving waters.
To the extent practical, chemical and oil storage and handling will be performed indoors. When
deemed not practical, such outdoor storage will be conducted in a fashion so as to minimize impacts
to storm water.
Any exterior loading and unloading of chemicals and/or oil shall be done in a manner so as to
minimize impacts to stormwater. Loading and loading of oil will be conducted in accordance with
any facility's Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan.
The use and storage of chemical and oil products will follow manufacturer's directions. The use
and storage of chemicals and/or oils will be conducted in accordance with the applicable portions
of the City of Lake Forest's Fire Code.
Waste Management:
To the extent practical, chemical and oil-related wastes storage will be performed indoors. When
deemed not practical, such outdoor storage will be conducted in a fashion so as to minimize impacts
to storm water.
To the extent practical, waste materials will be reused, recycle and or reclaimed in lieu of actual
disposal.
Used motor oil, transmission fluids, gear lubes, brake fluids and other vehicle fluids (except
antifreeze) will be managed in accordance with state and Federal used oil regulations which require
recycling.
Used antifreeze will be containerized, and sent for recycle or disposal.
Used batteries, mercury containing light bulbs and other Universal Wastes will be managed in
accordance with state and Federal universal waste regulations.
71
Used tires will be managed in accordance with applicable state regulations..
Asphalt and concrete maintenance by-products and excess earth excavation materials are
temporarily stored in stock pile maintained at the Compost Center and Municipal Services building.
This material is typically stored in dumpsters or other large bins provided by the Sanitation Section.
Attempts are made to recycle asphalt and concrete products prior to storage in the spoil stock pile.
Licensed waste haulers are contracted to remove and dispose the contents of the spoil stock pile at
a licensed landfill. Surface runoff from these areas is largely controlled by the use of enclosed or
roofed storage areas.
Contaminated soil/sediment generated during an emergency response or identified during
construction activities will be collected and managed for treatment or disposal. The extent possible,
attempts are made to avoid stockpiling of the contaminated soil (e.g., by arranging for the direct
loading and disposal of such soils when they are generated). If temporary stock piling is necessary,
place the stockpile on an impermeable liner, and cover the stockpile with a similar liner (e.g., plastic
sheeting). Additionally, BMP (presented in the SMC’s Technical Reference Manual or the Illinois
Urban Manual, 2014) are used to protect the down slope of the stockpiled area for erosion
downstream. Locate the construction access on the upstream side of the temporary stock pile.
All hazardous wastes and non-bulk, non-hazardous special wastes generated by municipal activities
will be stored in sealed containers constructed of compatible material and properly labeled. All
hazardous wastes will be managed in according to federal and state hazardous waste regulations
commensurate with the generator status of the facility where such wastes are generated.
Sanitary waste will be discharged into the sanitary sewer or managed by a licensed waste hauler.
Private certified companies perform most air-conditioning related work; therefore, the disposal of
Freon is not handled directly by the City.
4.6.1.11 Water Conservation & Irrigation
Water conservation practices minimize water use and help to avoid erosion and/or the transport of
pollutants into the stormwater management system. From May 15 through September 15, a
sprinkling/irrigation schedule is enforced. Maintenance activities (performed by the staff or its
contractors) preserve water by utilizing vacuum recovery as opposed to water based cleaning when
possible.
4.6.1.12 Green Infrastructure
The City of Lake Forest Engineering Department will encourage the application of green
infrastructure on municipally owned property.
4.6.1.13 Special Events
Ensure that entities in charge of special events (such as parades, fairs) prohibit the dumping,
depositing, dropping, throwing, discarding or leaving of litter and all other illicit discharges from
entering the stormwater management system. The Public Works Department and Parks Section
will oversee clean-up activities to promote compliance with the SMPP.
72
4.6.2 Spill Response Plan (BMP F.6, C.9)
The City of Lake Forest has an SPCC Plan that addresses the use and management of oil, as well
as oil spill response, at its Municipal Services Fleet Maintenance Garage.
In addition to the spill prevention and control procedures outlined in the SPCC Plan, the City of
Lake Forest will implement additional spill control and response actions wherever non-hazardous
chemicals and/or hazardous substances are stored or used. These procedures and practices are
implemented to prevent and control spills in a manner that minimizes or prevents discharge to the
stormwater management system and receiving waters. The following general guidelines are
implemented, when cleanup activities and safety are not compromised, regardless of the location
of the spill:
• Cover and protect spills from stormwater run-on and rainfall, until the spill materials are
removed,
• Dry cleanup methods should be used whenever possible,
• Dispose of used cleanup materials, contaminated materials and recovered spill material in
accordance with the all applicable Federal and/or Illinois regulations applicable to
hazardous and non-hazardous special waste.
• Contaminated water used for cleaning and decontamination shall not be allowed to enter
the stormwater management system,
• Keep waste storage areas clean, well-organized and equipped with appropriate cleanup
supplies, and
• Maintain perimeter controls, containment structures, covers and liners to ensure proper
function.
4.6.2.2 Spill Prevention
Ensure all hazardous substances are properly labeled. Store all hazardous wastes in sealed
containers constructed of compatible material and labeled. Locate items, such as paint, aerosol
cans, gasoline, solvents and other hazardous wastes, in non-flammable storage cabinets or on a
containment pallet. Do not overfill containers. Provide secondary containers when storing
hazardous substances in bulk quantities (>55gl). Dispense and/or use hazardous substances in a
way that prevents release.
4.6.2.2 Non-Hazardous Spills/Dumping
Upon observing or receiving notification of a potential illicit discharge into the storm sewer system
or any receiving waters, the Illicit Discharge Incident Tracking Form, found in Appendix D, is
used to log and investigate the incident. Appropriate procedures found within this Section are
implemented in the event an illicit discharge has been confirmed.
Non-hazardous spills typically consistent of an illicit discharge of household material(s) into the
street or stormwater management system. Upon notification or observance of a non-hazardous
illicit discharge, implement the following procedure:
73
• Sand bag or otherwise isolate with spill control equipment, the receiving inlet to prevent
additional discharge into the storm sewer system, as necessary. It may be necessary to
sand bag the next downstream inlet.
• Check structures (immediate and downstream). If possible, materials are vacuumed out.
The structure(s) are then jetted to dilute and flush the remaining unrecoverable illicit
discharge.
• Clean up may consist of applying an inert absorbent (e.g., “Oil Dry”) or sand and then
sweeping up the remnant material.
• After containment and cleanup activities have been performed, fill out the Spill Response
Notice (Appendix K) and distributes to adjoining residences/businesses. In residential
areas, the hanger should be provided to residences on both sides of the spill and on both
sides of the street.
• Document the location, type of spill and action taken on the Indirect Illicit Discharge
Tracking Form (Appendix D). .
• If a person is observed causing an illicit discharge, Code Enforcement is notified and
appropriate citations issued.
4.6.2.3 Hazardous Spills
Upon notification or observance of a hazardous illicit discharge, Public Works follows the
following procedure:
• Call 911, explain the incident.
• If it safe to do so and personnel have received training in spill response, undertake control
measures such as shutting down equipment / pumps, placing spill control booms, blankets,
and absorbents to control migration of material (e.g., at down gradient storm sewer inlets).
• Public Works provides emergency traffic control, as necessary;
• The Fire Department evaluates the situation and implements control measures as necessary;
• The Fire Department’s existing emergency response procedure for hazardous spill
containment clean-up activities, is followed;
• Document the location, type of spill and action taken on the Illicit Discharge Incident
Tracking Form (Appendix D); and,
4.6.2.3 Employee Training (BMP F.1)
The QLP provides training materials and opportunities. Promote education and training employees
(or contractors retained to manage City infrastructure) to ensure that they have the knowledge and
skills necessary to perform their functions effectively and efficiently. Employees are encouraged
to attend all relevant training sessions offered by the QLP and other entities on topics related to the
goals/objectives of the SMPP. Key educational topics include the following:
• Stormwater characteristics and water quality issues;
74
• The roles and responsibilities regarding implementation of the SMPP to consistently
achieve Permit compliance;
• Activities and practices that are, or could be sources, of stormwater pollution and non-
stormwater discharges;
• Managing and maintaining green infrastructure and low impact design features; and,
• How to use the SMPP and available guidance materials to select and implement BMPs.
Measurable Goal(s):
• Attend QLP offered training.
• Support QLP efforts by providing program information to staff.
Training Approach
Employees are encouraged to attend all relevant training sessions offered by the QLP and other
entities on topics related to the goals/objectives of the SMMP. Make available training materials
tailored to specific functional groups. The materials focus on storm water pollution prevention
measures and practices involved in routine activities carried out by the various functional groups.
Training Schedule and Frequency
Digital and hard copies of the training materials will be kept and shared with applicable new
employees as part of their job introduction. Employees are encouraged to share information with
other employees via email or other formats. Information may include:
• updates and news which might enhance pollution control activities,
• feedback from field implementation of BMPs, or
• new product information.
IDDE Training
Personnel conducting the IDDE portion of the SMPP shall thoroughly read and understand the
objectives of the IDDE subsections of this manual prior to performing any outfall inspections or
monitoring efforts.
75
5.0 PROGRAM AND PERFORMANCE MONITORING, EVALUATION AND
REPORTING
The SMPP represents an organized approach to achieving compliance with the stormwater
expectations of the NPDES Phase II program for both private and public activities. Land
development, redevelopment and transportation improvement projects were required to comply
with the provisions of the WDO prior acceptance of the SMPP. This SMPP documents and
organizes previously existing procedures and incorporates the objectives of the WDO to create one
cohesive program addressing pre-development, construction, post-development activities and
municipal operations.
This Section describes how the QLP and the City of Lake Forest will monitor and evaluate the
proposed stormwater pollution prevention plan based on the above stated objective. As part of the
stormwater management program, the City of Lake Forest:
• reviews its activities,
• inspects its facilities,
• oversees, guides, and trains its personnel, and
• evaluates the allocation of resources available to implement stormwater quality efforts.
5.1 Monitoring Program
As it pertains to watersheds located within the municipal boundaries of the City of Lake Forest, the
following monitoring activities are being conducted and/or are being planned:
• Lake and beach monitoring by the Lake County Health Department, Lakes Management
Unit.
• Ravine monitoring by the City of Lake Forest and the SMC.
• Chicago River, North Branch - Middle Fork and West Fork and Skokie River monitoring
by the City of Lake Forest.
5.1.1 Lake and Beach Monitoring - Lake County Health Department
In accordance with ILR 40 V.A.2.b.ii and ILR 40 V.A.2.b.v, the monitoring efforts performed by
the LCHD satisfy the monitoring requirement for the portions of the watershed tributary to an
assessed Lake. Due to the length of monitoring efforts performed by the county, trends in water
quality impairments and improvements can be best gauged by reviewing current and historic lakes
reports.
The Lakes Management Unit (LMU) has been collecting water quality data on Lake County lakes
since the late 1960s. This includes collection of data from the following lakes located within the
Lake Forest municipal limits:
• Eagle Lake
Since 2000, 176 different lakes each year have been studied and data collected on temperature,
dissolved oxygen, phosphorus, nitrogen, solids, pH, alkalinity, chloride, conductivity, water clarity,
the plant community and shoreline characteristics. The LMU collects baseline water quality
information from at least 12-15 different lakes in the county each year. These lakes must be at least
76
6 acres in size. Water quality information is obtained through the collection of water samples once
per month from May through September, usually at the deepest areas of the lakes.
Analysis - This water is analyzed for nutrients, solids, temperature, dissolved oxygen and various
other parameters. A plant survey to analyze the aquatic plant community for different species and
their relative occurrence is also conducted once per month from May through September.
Additionally, once per summer the shoreline of each lake is characterized for shoreline type,
severity of erosion and shoreline plant species (including invasives).
Summary Reports - Summary reports are written and presented to the management entity of the
lake and other concerned citizens during the following spring. These reports include the analysis
of data collected, a list of threats occurring in or around the lake, and recommendations on how to
reduce or eliminate these problems. Lake summary reports can be found
https://www.lakecountyil.gov/2400/Lake-Reports.
5.1.1.1 Lake Michigan
In accordance with ILR 40 V.A.2.b.ii and ILR 40 V.A.2.b.v, the monitoring efforts performed by
the LCHD satisfy the monitoring requirement for the portions of the watershed tributary to Lake
Michigan. A significant portion of the Lake Michigan Beaches are listed as impaired (Figure 9),
including Forest Park Beach. From approximately Memorial Day to Labor Day, bacteria
concentrations (E coli bacteria) are sampled at Forest Park Beach and other Lake County impaired
beaches.
Sanitary surveys have been completed on many of these “beach-sheds”. Other than beaches, the
LCHF occasionally sample locations within the Lake Michigan watershed. These are limited to
special projects (i.e., Waukegan River study, gull/beach pathogen study) or in a response to
complaints/issues such as suspect stormwater discharges or calls from citizens.
https://www.lakecountyil.gov/2405/Beach-Monitoring-Technical-Assistance
These results are used, in concert with other data collected by IEPA, to determine if TMDL
implementation recommendations have resulted in load reductions and improved overall beach
health.
5.1.1.2 Inland Beaches
From May to September, bacteria concentrations are monitored bimonthly at inland beaches and
recreational areas by LMU. The water samples are tested for E coli bacteria, which are found in
the intestines of almost all warm-blooded animals. Note that not all strains of E coli are the same,
and certain strains can make humans sick if ingested in high enough concentrations. If water
samples come back high for E coli (235 E coli/100 ml), the management body for the bathing beach
is notified and a sign is posted indicating the beach closure. Additionally, since rain events tend to
lead to elevated bacteria levels in the water column, the LMU advises that persons avoid swimming
for 48 hours after a large rain event.
The IEPA uses the number and duration of swim bans to assess whether or not the beaches support
designated uses for primary contact recreation. Within Illinois, Lake Michigan Beaches are found
to be “not supporting” of primary contact use when, on average over a three-year period: (1) one
or more beach closures occurred per year lasting less than a 2 week; or (2) less than one beach
closure occurred per year, but the average closure duration was one week or greater
77
FIGURE 9 - IMPAIRED LAKE MICHIGAN SEGMENTS
78
5.1.2 Ravine Monitoring - SCM and City of Lake Forest
The ravines found in Lake Forest and other communities bordering Lake Michigan represent unique
natural habitats. In recognition of this status and their susceptibility to erosion damage, efforts have
been undertaken to assess and monitor ravine susceptibility to erosion. In addition some damaged
ravine habitats have undergone restoration..
In the mid to late 2000's, the Alliance for the Great Lakes, in collaboration with Lake Michigan
Watershed Ecosystem Partnership, undertook an effort assess the Lake Michigan ravines, including
those located Lake County. Each ravine’s susceptibility to erosion was scored using a strategic
subwatershed identification process (SSIP). Building upon these efforts, in 2010 the SMC
undertook a more focused assessment of several of the ravines located in Lake County
In 2017, the City of Lake Forest formalized an assessment program for the ravines located within
its municipal boundaries. A ravine rating system was developed with input and assistance from the
SMC that assesses erosion susceptibility and water quality. In May 2017, training was provided to
Lake Forest personnel by the SMC in ravine assessment protocols.
A total of 15 ravines have been identified within the City of Lake Forest. In 2017, the City
conducted an assessment of each of these ravines. This data will be shared with the SMC. As
detailed in Subsection 1.3.2, the six high priority outfalls currently identified are all located within
ravines. Based on the data generated, a re-assessment will be made of the high priority outfalls that
have currently been identified to determine if the list should be amended.
In addition, the SMC plans on conducting additional ravine assessment work in 2018.
5.1.3 Other Community Monitoring - City of Lake Forest
A portion of the City of Lake Forest is located outside of existing monitoring efforts being
conducted by the Lake County Health Department.. In accordance with ILR 40 V.A.2.a. the
community conducts annual visual observations of stormwater discharge documenting color, odor,
clarity, floating solids, settled solids, suspended solids, foams, oil sheen and other indicators of
storm water pollution at upstream and downstream locations along receiving streams within the
City of Lake Forest, as well as the six defined high priority outfalls. In addition, The City
voluntarily collects certain additional water quality data using a portable monitoring instrument.
This additional monitoring includes data on pH and turbidity. The locations of these monitoring
points are illustrated on Figure 10.
5.2 Program Evaluation (BMP C.6)
At the end of each year the BMPs implemented by the MS4 should be evaluated in order to
determine the effectiveness of the program. Include a description of observed areas of program
effectiveness, at the end of Part B Stormwater Management Program Assessment within each
Annual Report submitted to IEPA. Program areas which do not appear to be improving should
also be identified and described within this portion of the Annual Report. This information will be
used to provide insight into how the program may need to evolve. The following are some
.
79
Figure 10: Additional Community Monitoring Locations
indicators that the BMPs are appropriate:
• A reduced number of outfalls having positive indicators for potential pollutants.
• An improvement, or no change, in the annual monitoring results.
• Improved community awareness of water quality and other NPDES program aspects.
• Increased number of hits on website information related to the NPDES program.
• Increased quantities of Household Hazardous Wastes or Electronic collected by SWALCO.
• Reduced number of septic system failures.
80
• Increased stakeholder involvement.
• Reduced number of SE/SC violations.
• Increase in Streambank and Shoreline stabilization projects, or a decrease in the extent of
projects necessary.
• Improved detention pond quality (including conversion of dry bottom or turf basins to
naturalized basins; removal of excess sediment accumulation and a general increase in
maintenance activity on detention ponds throughout the MS4).
• Reduced use of chloride and phosphorus by the MS4.
• Improved awareness of water quality and other NPDES program aspects by both City of
Lake Forest staff and its contractors.
5.2.1 Monitoring Program Evaluation
The results of the monitoring are used to further gage the effects of the SMPP on the
physical/habitat-related aspects of the receiving waters and the effectiveness of BMPs. Possible
causes of any documented degradation will be investigated and any appropriate corrective actions
will be incorporated into the SMPP.
• As part of the QLP section of the Annual Report, SMC provides a detailed discussion of
the State of Lake County Waters including a summary of TMDLs, an assessment of the
regional water quality monitoring and watershed group efforts and an estimate of the
effectiveness of the regional efforts.
• The City of Lake Forest is responsible for providing a discussion of any additional local
monitoring efforts within the MS4 portion of the Annual Report Part C Annual
Monitoring and Data Collection.
5.2.2 IDDE Program Evaluation
Experience gained from the USEPA NPDES program indicates a lower chance of observing
polluted dry-weather flows in residential and newer development areas, while older and industrial
land use areas having a higher incidence of observed dry-weather flows. Review the results of the
screening program to examine whether any trends can be identified that relate the incidence of dry-
weather flow observations to the age or land use of a developed area. If so, these conclusions may
guide future outfall screening activities.
Indirect or subtle discharges such as flash dumping are difficult to trace to their sources and can
only be remedied through public education and reporting. Therefore, it is expected that to some
degree they will continue although at a reduced magnitude and frequency. Although the outfall
screening program will be successful in identifying and eliminating most pollutants in dry-weather
discharges, the continued existence of dry-weather flows and associated pollutants will require an
ongoing commitment to continue the outfall screening program.
The first phase of the program was to complete the MS4 wide pre-screening effort, investigate
those outfalls exhibiting dry-weather flow and then eliminate identified illicit direct connections.
The ILR40 permit issued in 2016 requires that all high-priority outfalls be evaluated annually. It
is logical to assume that completion of the Phase 1 efforts and several years of annual screening,
the majority of the dry-weather pollution sources will be eliminated. However, new sources may
appear in the future as a result of mistaken cross connections from redevelopment, new-
development or remodeling. These efforts will determine the effectiveness of the program on a
long-term basis and show ongoing improvement through a reduced number of outfalls having
positive indicators of potential pollutants. Include a description of the screening and dry-weather
81
flow investigation, in Annual Report Part C IDDE Monitoring and Data Collection submitted
to IEPA annually.
5.2.3 SMPP Document Evaluation
Evaluation of the SMPP. The following types of questions/answers are discussed periodically
between the QLP, Stormwater Coordinator, Managers and field staff. Suggested improvements are
noted and incorporated into a revised SMPP document, approximately every 5-years.
• Are proper stormwater management practices integrated into planning, designing and
construction of both public and private projects?
• Are efforts to incorporate stormwater practices into maintenance activities effective and
efficient?
• Is the training program sufficient?
• Is the SMPP sufficient with respect to both the BMPs and measurable goals described for
each of the six MCM?
• Are the procedures for implementing the SMPP adequate?
• Are there any TMDL Reports within the community and if yes, is there an action plan for
compliance?
• Were there any issues of non-compliance and if yes, determine the plan for achieving
compliance with a timeline of actions?
APPENDIX A
YEARLY TRACKING FORM
Annual SMPP TasksBMPTaskResp. Party Date Compl'd SMPP SectionA.6Post NOI, SMPP and Annual Report on website3.2.BB.4Present Annual Report to Board during open meeting3.3.BC.1Update outfall map (new permits, outfall inventory updates)1.4.B, 3.4.D.3.cC.1Inspect for "new" outfalls every 5 years1.4.BC.3, C.7Pre-screen 100% of outfalls (20% per year or 100% within every 5-yrs)3.4.D.2.aC.3, C.8Complete outfall inspection procedure for all outfalls with observed dry weather flow (20% per year or 100% within every 5-yrs). Document.3.4.D.2.b-cC.3, C.8Inspect all high priority outfalls3.4.D.2.bC.6Review the results of the screening program. Include assessment in Part B of the Annual Report.4.2C.7Inspect catch basins, clean approximately catch basins (20% per year or 100% within every 5-yrs). Document.3.7.A.2.bE.6, E.7Consider public implementation of watershed plan recommendations as part of fiscal planning/budgeting3.6.D, 3.6.EE.6Inspect receiving water streambanks for erosion and flowlines for sediment accumulation (in concert with outfall inspection and pre-screening efforts)3.6.E.1E.6Inspect detention basins (20% per year or 100% within every 5-yrs of unassessed facilities)3.6.E.2F.2Inspect and recondition spreaders and spinners. Install these items onto snow removal vehicles, performing test operations, calibrating distribution rates per National Salt Institution Application Guidelines, and conducting better driver training.3.7.A.4.aA-F Review Program, include finding in annual report4.2B.6Evaluate SWPP. Major highlights and deficiencies should be noted annually and the plan revised accordingly on a minimum 5-yr basis, or as necessary.4.2.CComply with monitoring program commitments, describe in Annual Report4.1
As needed SMPP TasksBMP TaskResp. Party Date Compl'dSMPP SectionA.1, A.4Attend/sponsor outreach events and scheduled meetings with the general public and distribute materials3.2.A, 3.2.CC.3Respond to, track and resolve indirect illicit discharges3.4.CC.4Complete source id/tracing procedures for identified illicit discharges. Document.3.4.D.3C.5, C.8Complete removal procedures for found illicit discharges3.4.D.4C.9, F.6Implement Spill Response Plan and provide notice for observed discharges3.7.BE.3Provide sample maintenance plan to pre-wdo sites 3.6.BF.1Ensure applicable Village staff trained to implement SMPP3.7.CF.1Encourage employees to attend all relevant training sessions offered by the QLP and other entities on topics related to the goals/objectives of the SWPPP3.7.COptional BMPA.6, B5Support QLP and private efforts related to Storm Drain Stenciling3.2.DA.6Track efforts regarding septic system maintenance 3.2.F
On-going SMPP TasksBMP TaskDate Compl'd SMPP SectionAllSupport QLP efforts3.4.A.1A.1, A.6Maintain take-a-way racks and provide other appropriate outreach efforts. Provide safe vehicle maintenance, car washing, healthy lawn care, green infrastructure, pool dewatering, information.3.2.A, 3.2.G-KA.1Include SMPP related article in newsletter3.2.AA.4Support and publicize SWALCO collections.3.2.EB.3Participate in QLP or other sponsored watershed planning events (stakeholder groups)3.3.AA.6Maintain link to SMC, link to SWALCO, IEPA, safe vehicle maintenance & car washing information, healthy lawn care, green infrastructure, pool dewatering.3.2.B, 3.2.G-KB.6, C.6Participates in MAC meetings and events hosted by the QLP3.3.CB.7Publicize contact information to encourage submission of complaints, suggestions, requests3.3.B.2C.2Enforce WDO3.4.A.1C.2Enforce IDDE Ordinance3.4.A.2C.2Enforce Subdivision & Public Utility Ordinance3.4.A.3D.1-D.6, E.2-E.5Adminsiter & enforce (or assist SMC in) WDO provisions (plan review, permitting, inspections and enforcement) 3.5.B-I, 3.6.A-ED.5, E.3Keep log, track number, respond to se/sc and post construction storm water concerns3.5.G, 3.6.BE.4infrastructure if practicable3.6.CE.6, E.7encourage property owners to implement watesrhed plan recommendations (streambank, shoreline, detention basin etc)3.6.EE.7, F.4Street sweeping 3.7.A.1E.7, F.2Inspect swales and overland flow paths for erosion and sediment accumulation, report 3.7.A.2E.7, F.4Collect yard waste/leafs3.7.A.3F.4Remove litter/debris from Village property, roadway right-of-ways, facilities, park & rec areas3.7.A.3F.4Collection and disposal of "road kill" and carcasses3.7.A.7F.3Follow Snow Removal and Ice Control BMP in SMPP3.7.A.4F.4Vehicle Maintenance collection and disposal (waste oil, antifreeze, batteries, tires)3.7.A.6F.4Follow Waste Control BMP in SMPP3.7.A.8F.3Identify and maintain green infrastructure3.7.A.10F.4Prevent/Minimize illicit discharges from Special Events3.7.A.11OPTIONALB.7, D.5Maintain Indirect Illicit Discharge Tracking forms and respond (hotline calls)3.3.DB.7Support adopt-a-highway efforts3.3.EC.2Enforce Phosphorus Ordinance3.4.A.4E.7, F.4Maintain pet waste stations3.7.A.5
APPENDIX B
DEWATERING FACT SHEET
GUIDELINES FOR DRAINING
SWIMMING POOLS
APPENDIX C
DESCRIPTION OF POLLUTANT INDICATORS
Pollutant Indicators
PHYSICAL POLLUTANT INDICATORS
Adapted from New Hampshire Estuaries Project and the IDDE Guidance Manual by the
Center for Watershed Protection.
Odor
Water is a neutral medium and does not produce odor; however, most organic and
some inorganic chemicals contribute odor to water. Odor in water may originate from
municipal and industrial waste discharges, from natural sources such as decomposition
of vegetative matter, or from associated microbial activity.
Table 1: Odor or Potential Illicit Discharges (adapted from CWP)
Odor Possible Cause
Sewage Wastewater treatment facilities, domestic waste connected into storm
drain, failing septic system
Sulfide (rotten
eggs)
Decaying organic waste from industries such as meat packers,
dairies and canneries
Rancid/sour Many chemicals, including pesticides and fertilizers, emit powerful
odors that may produce irritation or stinging sensations.
Petroleum/gas Industry associated with vehicle maintenance or petroleum product
storage; gas stations
Laundry Laundromat, dry cleaning, household laundry
Color
Color is a numeric computation of the color observed in a water quality sample, as
measured in cobalt-platinum units. Both industrial liquid wastes and sewage tend to
have elevated color values. Unfortunately, some “clean” flow types can also have high
color values. A color value higher than 500 units may indicate an industrial discharge.
Table 2: Color of Potential Illicit Discharges (adapted from CWP)
Water Color Possible Cause Images
Brown Water –
water ranging in
color from light-tea
to chocolate milk; it
may have a rotten
egg odor.
Human causes may be eroded,
disturbed soils from constr.
sites, animal enclosures,
destabilized stream banks and
lake shore erosion due to boat
traffic.
Yellow – Human causes may include
textile facilities, chemical plants
or pollen.
Gray Water –
water appears
milky and may
have a rotten egg
smell and/or soap
odor. There may
also be an
appearance of
cottony slime.
Human causes may be illicit
connections of domestic
wastewater; untreated septic
system discharge; illegal boat
discharge; and parking lot
runoff.
Green Water –
ranging from blue
green to bright
green color and
may impart odor.
Conditions
typically occur
from May to
October.
Human causes may be over-
fertilizing lawns, boat
discharges, septic systems,
agriculture operations, or
discharging poorly treated
wastewater.
Orange/Red - Human causes may include
meat packing facilities or dyes.
Green Flecks –
resembling floating
blue-green paint
chips or grass
clippings.
These Blooms and
are potentially
toxic.
Human cause is excessive
nutrients. Fertilizers used on
lawns can contaminate surface
and ground water.
Table 2 (continued)
Water Color Possible Cause Images
Green Hair-Like
Strands - bright or
dark green,
resembling cotton
candy and often in
floating mats.
Human causes are excessive
nutrients from fertilizers or failed
on-shore septic systems.
Multi-Color Water
– various or
uniform color,
other than brown,
green or gray. For
rainbow sheen see
floatables.
Human causes include oil or
hazardous waste spill, paint and
paint equipment rinsed into
storm drains or into failing septic
systems.
Turbidity
Turbidity is a measure of the clarity of water. Turbidity may be caused by many factors,
including suspended matter such as clay, silt, or finely divided organic and inorganic
matter. Turbidity is a measure of the optical properties that cause light to be scattered
and not transmitted through a sample. The presence of turbidity is to be assessed by
comparing the sample to clean glass sample container with colorless distilled water.
Turbidity and color are related terms but are not the same. Remember, turbidity is a
measure of how easily light can penetrate through the sample bottle, whereas color is
defined by the tint or intensity of the color observed.
Figure 9 Turbidity Severity Examples
(adapted from CWP)
Turbidity Turbidity Turbidity
Severity 1 Severity 2 Severity 3
Floatables
The presence of sewage, floating scum, foam, oil sheen, or other materials can be
obvious indicators of an illicit discharge. However, trash originating from areas adjacent
to the outfall is this section.
• If you think the floatable is sewage, you should automatically assign it a severity
score of three since no other source looks quite like it.
• Suds are rated based on their foaminess and staying power. A severity score of
three is designated for thick foam that travels many feet before breaking up. Natural
foam breaks apart easily, can be brown, black or yellowish and may smell fishy or
musty.
• Surface oil sheens are ranked based on their thickness and coverage. In some
cases, surface sheens may not be from oil discharges, but instead created by in-
stream processes. A petroleum sheens doesn’t break apart and quickly flows back
together.
Figure 10 Natural Sheen versus Synthetic
(adapted from CWP)
Sheen from natural bacteria forms a Synthetic oil forms a swirling
pattern
swirl-like film that cracks if disturbed
Table 3: Floatables in Potential Illicit Discharges (adapted from CWP)
Floatables
Sewage
Human causes include connection of domestic
wastewater, leaking sanitary sewers or failing septic
systems.
Suds and Foam –
Common human causes of unnatural foam include leaking
sewer lines, boat discharges, improper sewer connections
to storm sewers and detergents from car washing
activities.
Petroleum (oil sheen)
Human causes may include leaking underground storage
tank or illegal dumping.
Grease
Common human causes include overflow from sanitary
systems (due to clogging from grease) and illegal
dumping.
CHEMICAL POLLUTANT INDICATORS
Ammonia
Ammonia is a good indicator of sewage, since its concentration is much higher there
than in groundwater or tap water. High ammonia concentrations (>50 mg/l) may also
indicate liquid wastes from some industrial sites. Ammonia is relatively simple and safe
to analyze. Some challenges include the potential generation of wastes from non-
human sources, such as pets or wildlife.
Potential ID NH3-N: > 0.1 mg/L
Chlorine
Chlorine is used throughout the country to disinfect tap water, except where private
wells provide the water supply. Chlorine concentrations in tap water tend to be
significantly higher than most other discharge types. Unfortunately, chlorine is extremely
volatile, and even moderate levels of organic materials can cause chlorine levels to drop
below detection levels. Because chlorine is non-conservative, it is not a reliable
indicator, although if very high chlorine levels are measured, it is a strong indication of a
water line break, swimming pool discharge, or industrial discharge from a chlorine
bleaching process.
Copper
Concentrations of copper in dry-weather flows can be a result of corrosion of water
pipes or automotive sources (for example, radiators, brake lines, and electrical
equipment). The occurrence of copper in dry-weather flows could also be caused by
inappropriate discharges from facilities that either use or manufacture copper-based
products. A copper value of >0.025-mg/L indicates an industrial discharge is present.
Industrial sources of copper include the following:
• Copper manufacturing (smelting),
• Copper metal processing/scrap remelting,
• Metal plating,
• Chemicals manufacturing,
• Analytical laboratories,
• Power plants,
• Electronics,
• Wood preserving, and
• Copper wire production.
In each of these industries, wastes containing copper would normally be discharged to a
treatment facility. Sludge from the waste treatment facility, whether on-site (including
lagooning) or publicly operated treatment facilities, would contain copper. If the sludge
(or the treatment process) is not managed properly, copper could enter the storm sewer
system.
Detergents
Most illicit discharges have elevated concentration of detergents. Sewage and wash
water discharges contain detergents used to clean clothes or dishes, whereas liquid
wastes contain detergents from industrial or commercial cleansers. The nearly universal
presence of detergents in illicit discharges, combined with their absence in natural
waters or tap water, makes them an excellent indicator. Research has revealed three
indicator parameters that measure the level of detergent or its components--
surfactants, fluorescence, and surface tension. Surfactants have been the most widely
applied and transferable of the three indicators. Fluorescence and surface tension show
promise, but only limited field testing has been performed on these more experimental
parameters; therefore these are not tested. Refer to Boron and Surfactants
descriptions.
E. coli, Enterococci and Total Coliform
Each of these bacteria is found at very high concentrations in sewage compared to
other flow types, and is a good indicator of sewage or seepage discharges, unless pet
or wildlife sources exist in the subwatershed. Overall, bacteria are good supplemental
indicators and can be used to find “problem” streams or outfalls that exceed public
health standards.
Potential ID Range: Fecal Coliform > 2,000 mg/L indicates waste water contamination.
Potential ID Range: E. coli bacteria > 1,000/100 ml indicates waste water
contamination.
Fluoride
Fluoride, at a concentration of two parts per million, is added to drinking water supplies
in most communities to improve dental health. Consequently, fluoride is an excellent
conservative indicator of tap water discharges or leaks from water supply pipes that end
up in the storm drain. Fluoride is obviously not a good indicator in communities that do
not fluorinate drinking water, or where individual wells provide drinking water. Fluoride
levels greater than 0.6-mg/L indicate a potable water source is connected to the
stormwater system.
Phenol
Phenol is a very commonly occurring chemical and can be found in foods, medicines,
and cleaning products, as well as industrial products and by-products. Generally, the
appearance of phenols in stormwater would indicate a misconnected industrial sewer to
a storm drain or ditch. Exceptions would include runoff from treated wood storage yards
(for example, treated lumber and telephone poles) and improper disposal (flash
dumping) of cleaning products. A phenol value greater than 0.1-mg/L indicate an illicit
discharge is present.
Industrial sources of phenol include the following:
• Chemical manufacturing (organic),
• Textile manufacturing,
• Paint and coatings manufacturing,
• Metal coating,
• Resin manufacturing,
• Tire manufacturing,
• Plastics fabricating,
• Electronics,
• Oil refining and re-refining,
• Naval stores (turpentine and other wood treatment chemicals),
• Pharmaceutical manufacturing,
• Paint stripping (for example, automotive and aircraft),
• Military installations (rework and repair facilities),
• Coke manufacturing,
• Iron production, and
• Ferro-alloy manufacturing.
Other sources of phenol include improper handling and disposal of cleaning compounds
by institutions such as hospitals and nursing homes.
pH
Most discharge flow types are neutral, having a pH value around 7, although
groundwater concentrations can be somewhat variable. pH is a reasonably good
indicator for liquid wastes from industries, which can have very high or low pH (ranging
from 3 to 12). The pH of residential wash water tends to be rather basic (pH of 8 or 9).
The pH of a discharge is very simple to monitor in the field with low cost test strips or
probes. Although pH data is often not conclusive by itself, it can identify problem outfalls
that merit follow-up investigations using more effective indicators.
Potential ID Range: <6.5 and > 8.5
Phosphorus
Phosphorus is recognized as the controlling factor in plan and algae frown. Small
increases in phosphorus can fuel substantial increases in aquatic plant and algae
grown. In addition to reducing the recreational use of the water body the increased plant
and algae growth lowers dissolved oxygen levels. Low dissolved oxygen levels often
results in the death of certain fish, invertebrates and other aquatic animals, reduce
recreational use, property values and public health. A key source of phosphorus comes
from runoff pollution, as rain or melting snow wash over fertilized areas or manure.
Potential ID Range: >1 mg/L
Potassium
Potassium is found at relatively high concentrations in sewage, and extremely high
concentrations in many industrial process waters. Consequently, potassium can act as
a good first screen for industrial wastes, and can also be used in combination with
ammonia to distinguish wash waters from sanitary wastes. An ammonium to potassium
ratio of >1 or <1indicate waste water or wash water discharge respectively. A
potassium value of >20-mg/l is a good indicator for industrial discharges.
Surfactants
Surfactants are the active ingredients in most commercial detergents, and are typically
measured as Methyl Blue Active Substances (or MBAS). They are a synthetic
replacement for soap, which builds up deposits on clothing over time. Since surfactants
are not found in nature, but are always present in detergents, they are excellent
indicators of sewage and wash waters. The presence of surfactants in cleansers,
emulsifiers and lubricants also makes them an excellent indicator of industrial or
commercial liquid wastes. A surfactant value of > 0.25-mg/L within residential areas
indicates that either a sewage or wash water is present in the stormwater; a value of >5-
mg/L within non-residential areas indicates that there is an industrial discharge (refer to
Table 46 from the Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination manual by the Center for
Watershed Protection for use in determining industrial flow types).
APPENDIX D
ILLICIT DISCHARGE INCIDENT TRACKING FORMS
C-9
Illicit Discharge Incident Tracking Form
Incident ID:
Responder Information
Call taken by: Call date:
Call time: Precipitation (inches) in past 24-48 hrs:
Reporter Information
Incident time: Incident date:
Caller contact information (optional):
Incident Location (complete one or more below)
Latitude and longitude:
Stream address or outfall #:
Closest street address:
Nearby landmark:
Primary Location Description Secondary Location Description:
Stream corridor
(In or adjacent to stream) Outfall In-stream flow Along banks
Upland area
(Land not adjacent to stream) Near storm drain Near other water source (storm water pond, wetland, etc.):
Narrative description of location:
Upland Problem Indicator Description
Dumping Oil/solvents/chemicals Sewage
Wash water, suds, etc. Other: _____________________________
Stream Corridor Problem Indicator Description
Odor
None Sewage Rancid/Sour Petroleum (gas)
Sulfide (rotten eggs);
natural gas Other: Describe in “Narrative” section
Appearance
“Normal” Oil sheen Cloudy Suds
Other: Describe in “Narrative” section
Floatables
None: Sewage (toilet paper, etc) Algae Dead fish
Other: Describe in “Narrative” section
Narrative description of problem indicators:
Suspected Violator (name, personal or vehicle description, license plate #, etc.):
5.15 Indirect Illicit Discharge Tracking Form
IDDE Summary Form
Call
Date
Call
Time:
Incident
Date: Incident Location: Upland Indicator Stream Indicator
APPENDIX E
STORM WATER OUTFALL SCREENING EQUIPMENT CHECKLIST
5.2 Storm Water Outfall Screening Equipment Checklist
STORM WATER OUTFALL SCREENING EQUIPMENT CHECKLIST
Field Analysis pH Testing Strips
Chlorine Testing Strips
Copper Test Strip
Ammonia Test Strip
Phenols Test Kit (Minimum of 15 Tests)
Detergents Test Kit (Minimum of 15 Tests)
Color Chart
Thermometer
Wash Bottle with Tap Water
Sampling Extended Sampler
250-ml and 500-ml glass sample containers with labels
Cooler with ice or ice packs
Other Outfall Screening Data Form (Minimum of 10)
Outfall Sampling Report (Minimum of 10)
Clipboard and Pens
Resident Form Letters (Minimum of 10)
Training Manual
Storm Sewer Atlas
Digital Camera
Flashlight
Manhole Cover Hook
Tape Measure
Folding Rule
Brush Clearing Tool
Plastic Trash Bags
Paper Towels
Safety (PPE Equipment) Traffic Cones/Flags/Light Sticks
Traffic Safety Vest
First Aid Kit
Steel-Toe Boots
Work Gloves
Safety Glasses/Goggles
Rubber Boots
Disposable Gloves (Latex)
ID Badge
Personal (supplied by
employee if desired)
Insect Repellant
Sunscreen
5.2 Storm Water Outfall Screening Equipment Checklist
Safety is the primary consideration while inspecting upstream sampling locations. In
general, the rule “if in doubt, don’t” is followed. Latex gloves are worn while collecting
and handling samples. A first aid kit is included in each vehicle to treat minor injuries.
Obtain medical help for major injuries as soon as possible. Report all injuries, minor and
major to appropriate persons.
Access to Private Property
In some cases, it may be necessary for Public Works personnel to enter or cross private
property to investigate discovered illicit discharges. A form letter should be prepared that
includes a short description of the project, the purpose of the access to the property, and
the name of a project contact person with a telephone number. Attempt to contact each
home, or business, owner for permission. Public Works personnel shall have
identification indicating that they are municipal employees. If the owner is not present, a
letter should be left at the premises to facilitate return inspection. If permission to access
property is denied, a public official should then contact the owner at a later date. All
access by municipal personnel onto private property shall conform to the insert ordinance
name if applicable.
Avoid confrontational situations with citizens and attempt to answer questions concisely
and without being alarmist. Public Works personnel should be coached on appropriate
responses to questions from citizens. If a field crew feels uncomfortable or threatened,
they should remove themselves from the situation and report to the incident to their
supervisor.
Traffic
All traffic control measures are to be in accordance with the requirements of the Manual
on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and other internal Policies and Procedures as set
forth by the Public Works Department.
In general, the following additional policies are applicable. Public Works personnel
generally work on streets only during the hours of 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. except in emergency
situations. All field crews are required to wear Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) in
accordance with Standard Operating Procedures set forth by the Public Works
Department.
Confined Space Entry
Confined space entry for this program would include climbing into or inserting one’s
head into a pipe, manhole, or catch basin. In general, do not cross the vertical plane
defining an outfall pipe or the horizontal plane defining a manhole, unless properly
prepared for confined space entry. IN NO CASE SHALL FIELD CREW MEMBERS
WHO ARE UNTRAINED AND/OR UNEQUIPPED FOR CONFINED SPACE
ENTRY ATTEMPT TO ENTER CONFINED SPACES. Confined space entry shall
be conducted only by trained personnel with appropriate rescue and monitoring
equipment.
5.2 Storm Water Outfall Screening Equipment Checklist
Other Hazards
Table 5: Other Outfall Inspection Hazards
Hazard Prevention
Access Avoid steep slopes, dense brush and deep water. Report unsafe
locations and move on to next location.
Stuck Avoid wading where bottom sediments are easily disturbed or
depths are unknown.
Strong Gas/Solvent
Odor Do not select manhole for sampling
Bodily Harm From
Manhole Covers Use manhole hook and watch for pinch points
Slip Proper Foot Gear and Use of Rope If Warranted
Falls Use extended sample collection device; don’t cross horizontal
or vertical plane at end of outfall
Heat and Dehydration Adequate Water Intake; Avoid Excessive Exertion on Hot Days
Sunburn Sunscreen and Appropriate Clothing
Poisonous
Plants/Animals Identify and Avoid
Vicious Dogs Avoid; Use Animal Repellent if necessary
Water Bodies Flotation Devices
Ticks Check Entire Body at End of Each Day
Mosquitoes Apply Repellent
APPENDIX F
STORM WATER OUTFALL INSPECTION DATA FORM
AND INSTRUCTIONS
5.3 Storm Water Outfall Inspection Data Form 1
Section 1: Background Data
Subwatershed: Outfall ID:
Date: Time (Military):
Temperature: Inspector(s):
Previous 48 Hours Precipitation: Photo’s Taken (Y/N) If yes, Photo Numbers:
Land Use in Drainage Area (Check all that apply):
Industrial
Residential
Commercial
Open Space
Institutional
Other: ______________________________________________
Known Industries: ____________________________________
Section 2: Outfall Description
Storm Sewer
(Closed Pipe)
RCP CMP
PVC HDPE
Steel
Clay / draintile
Other: _______
Circular
Elliptical
Box
Other: ____
Single
Double
Triple
Other:_____
Diameter/Dimensi
ons:
_______________
___
In Water:
No
Partially
Fully
With Sediment:
No
Partially
Fully
Open drainage
(swale/ditch)
Concrete
Earthen
rip-rap
Other:
Trapezoid
Parabolic
Other:
Depth:
Top Width:
Bottom Width:
Section 3: Physical Indicators
Outfall Damage Spalling, Cracking or Chipping Peeling Paint
Corrosion
Deposits/Stains Oily Flow Line Paint Other:
Abnormal Vegetation Excessive Inhibited
Poor pool quality Odors Colors Floatables Oil Sheen
Suds Excessive Algae Other:
Pipe algea/growth Brown Orange Green Other:
Do physical indictors suggest an illicit discharge is present (Y/N):
Flow Present? Yes No If No, Skip to Section 7 and Close Illicit Discharge Investigation
Flow Description Trickle Moderate Substantial
5.3 Storm Water Outfall Inspection Data Form 2
Section 4: Physical Indicators (Flowing Outfalls Only)
INDICATOR CHECK if
Present DESCRIPTION RELATIVE SEVERITY INDEX (1-3)
Odor
Sewage Rancid/sour
Sulfide Petroleum/gas
Laundry Other:
1–Faint 2 – Easily
detected
3 – Noticeable
from a
distance
Color
(color chart)
Clear Brown
Gray Yellow
Green Orange/Red
Multi-Color Other:
1–Faint colors
in sample
bottle
2 – Clearly
visible in sample
bottle
3 – Clearly
visible in
outfall flow
Turbidity See severity 1–Slight
cloudiness 2 – Cloudy 3 – Opaque
Floatables
-Does Not
Include Trash!!
Sewage Suds and Foam
Petroleum (oil sheen)
Grease Other:
1–Few/slight;
origin not obvious
2 – Some;
indications
of origin
3 - Some;
origin clear
Do physical indictors (flowing) suggest an illicit discharge is present (Y/N):
Section 5: On-Site Sampling / Testing (Flowing Outfalls Only)
Temperature NA NA Thermometer
pH 6 – 9 5-in-1 Test Strip
Ammonia <3 mg/L April – Oct
< 8 mg/L Nov - March
Test Strip
Free Chlorine NA NA 5-in-1 Test Strip
Total Chlorine < 0.05 mg/L 5-in-1 Test Strip
Phenols < 0.1mg/L Test Kit
Detergents as Surfactants > 0.25 mg/L residential
> 5 mg/L non-residential
Test Kit
Copper <0.025 mg/L Test Strip
Alkalinity NA NA 5-in-1 Test Strip
Hardness NA NA 5-in-1 Test Strip
Sample Location
(Note NA values used for future tracing procedures)
Section 6: Data Collection for Lab Testing (see flow chart)
1. Sample for the lab? Yes No
2. If yes, collected from: Flow Pool
Fecal Coliform 400 per 100 mL
Flouride 0.6 mg/l
Potassium
Ammonium/Potas
sium ratio or
> 20mg/l
*note label sample with outfall number
Section 7: Any Non-Illicit Discharge Concerns (e.g., trash or needed infrastructure repairs)?
Figure 4: Outfall Inspection Procedure Flow Chart Is Flow Present? Schedule follow-up inspection with-in 3 days All Outfalls (Complete Sections 1, 2 & 3 of Inspection Data Form) Illicit Discharge found. Follow tracing procedure YES NO Do Physical Indicators (Section 3) Suggest an Illicit Discharge? Close out Illicit Discharge Investigation Do Section 4 indicators suggest an illicit discharge? Complete Section 6 NO NO YES NO Is Flow Present? YES NO Complete Section 7 Complete Section 4 Complete Section 5 Do Section 5 indicators suggest an illicit discharge? Illicit Discharge found. Follow tracing procedure YES NO Do Section 6 indicators suggest an illicit discharge? Illicit Discharge found. Follow tracing procedure YES
5.3 Storm Water Outfall Inspection Data Form Instructions 1
Instructions for completing the
Stormwater Outfall Inspection Data Form
Strike out incorrect entries with a single line; correct values or descriptions are written
above or near the struck-out entries. Do not use a new data entry form to correct an
incorrect entry. At the completion of each outfall inspection, the field crews are
responsible for ensuring that a Stormwater Outfall Inspection Data Form has been
completely and correctly filled out and that all data and remarks are legible. It is
important to check that values for all chemical parameters have been entered.
Section 1: Background Data
Subwatershed: The receiving water from the stormwater outfall inventory to be entered
here.
Outfall ID: Enter the outfall identification number from the stormwater outfall inventory.
Date: To avoid confusion, dates are be written in the following manner: DAY MONTH
YEAR. For example, 10 MARCH 2007.
Time: Military time (24-hour clock) to be used (for example, 8:30 a.m. would be written
as 0830; likewise, 1:30 p.m. would be written as 1330).
Temperature: A concise description of the weather conditions at the time of the
screening is to be recorded (for example, Clear, 75 F).
Inspector: The name(s) of the field personnel.
Previous 48 Hours Precipitation: The total amount of precipitation during the 48 hours
preceding the inspection is to be noted (for example, none-72 Hours or 0”=4 days). If the
total precipitation is not known, it is appropriate to enter a qualitative assessment if the
precipitation was minor. For example, Drizzle-36 Hours if appropriate. If the
precipitation amount was significant, actual precipitation totals is obtained from a local
rain gage, if available.
Photo’s Taken (Yes/No): Photographs are to be taken with a camera that superimposes a
date and time on the film. The date and time should correspond to the date and time
recorded on the data form.
Photo Numbers: If photographs are taken, the number(s) is recorded.
Land Use: Check all that apply, noting which land use is predominate. If the industrial
box is checked, any known industries are listed to facilitate potential tracing efforts.
5.3 Storm Water Outfall Inspection Data Form Instructions 2
Section 2: Outfall Description
Type of Outfall: Storm Sewer (Closed Pipe) or Open Drainage (Swale/Ditch):
First check if the outfall is either from a Closed Pipe or Open Drainage. Then complete
the following row to describe outfall characteristics.
Section 3: Physical Indicators
Indicators: Complete rows describing outfall characteristics (Outfall Damage,
Deposits/Stains, Abnormal Vegetation, Poor pool quality, Pipe algea/growth). This
section is filled out regardless of current flow conditions. No flow during the time of the
inspection, does not rule out the potential of illicit discharges. Corroding or stained
pipes, dead or absence of vegetation, are potential indicators of illicit discharges from
direct or indirect (i.e. dumping) sources.
Likelyhood: After inspecting the physical conditions of the outfall, the likelihood of an
illicit discharge is assessed.
Flow Present (Yes/No): A Yes or No is entered here to indicate the presence or absence
of dry-weather flow. If the outfall is submerged or inaccessible, “See Notes” is entered
and an explanation provided in the “Notes” section.
Flow Description: A description of the quantity of the dry-weather flow is provided.
Refer to Figure 6 of the SMPP.
Flow Chart Procedure:
• If No is entered in the “Flow Present” block and no non-flowing physical indicators
appear present the inspection can be closed, skip to Section 7 of the form.
• If No is entered in the “Flow Present” block but indicators appear present, place the
outfall on the follow-up inspection log, then the current inspection can be closed, skip
to Section 7 of the form.
• If Yes is entered in the “Flow Present” block (regardless of the presence of non-
flowing physical indicators), complete remainder of Section and proceed to Section 4.
Section 4: Physical Indicators (Flowing Outfalls Only)
Complete rows describing outfall characteristics (Odor, Color, Turbidity, Floatables).
This section is filled out for flowing outfalls only.
Odor: The presence of an odor is to be assessed by fanning the hand toward the nose
over a wide-mouth container of the sample, keeping the sample about 6 to 8 inches from
the face. Be careful not to be distracted by odors in the air. Provide a description of the
odor, if present. Refer to Table 2 of the SMPP.
5.3 Storm Water Outfall Inspection Data Form Instructions 3
Color: The presence of color in the discharge is to be assessed by filling a clean glass
sample container with a portion of the grab sample and comparing the sample with a
color chart, if color is present. If a color chart is used, the number corresponding to the
color matching the sample is to be entered in this blank. Color is not assessed by looking
into the discharge. Refer to Table 3 of the SMPP.
Turbidity “clarity”: Turbidity is a measure of the clarity of water. Turbidity may be
caused by many factors, including suspended matter such as clay, silt, or finely divided
organic and inorganic matter. Turbidity is a measure of the optical properties that cause
light to be scattered and not transmitted through a sample. The presence of turbidity is to
be assessed by comparing the sample to clean glass sample container with colorless
distilled water. Refer to Table 4 of the SMPP.
Floatables: The presence of floating scum, foam, oil sheen, or other materials on the
surface of the discharge are to be noted. Describe of any floatables present that are
attributable to discharges from the outfall. Do not include trash originating from areas
adjacent to the outfall in this observation. Refer to Figure 5 and Table 4 of the SMPP.
Likelyhood: After inspecting the physical conditions of the outfall discharge, the
likelihood of an illicit discharge is assessed. If flowing physical indicators are present the
tracing procedure are immediately implemented by one of the field crew. The second
member of the field crew continues with the inspection by performing the on-site testing
in Section 5.
Flow Chart Procedure:
• If flowing physical indicators are present the tracing procedure is immediately
implemented by one of the field crew. The second member of the field crew continues
with the inspection by performing the on-site testing in Section 5.
• If flowing physical indicators do not suggest an illicit discharge continue with the
inspection by performing the on-site testing in Section 5.
Section 5: On-Site Sampling/Testing (Flowing Outfalls Only)
Parameters: Test strip or kit chemical analyses are conducted for the following
parameters in accordance with the Flow Chart, refer to Figure 7 of the SMPP.
• pH, test strip,
5.3 Storm Water Outfall Inspection Data Form Instructions 4
• Color, color chart,
• Chlorine, test strip,
• Copper, test strip,
• Ammonia, test strip,
• Phenols, test kit, and
• Detergents, test kit.
Testing is done by either a test strip or test kit as applicable (refer to the equipment
column). The results are compared with the “acceptable range” and the “within range”
column is filled out with a Yes or No. Note that the Temperature, Alkalinity and
Hardness are determined although these results do not need to be compared with an
“acceptable range”. These values are used to assist in determining the source of the illicit
discharge during the tracing procedure.
Sampling Location: A description of the actual sampling location is to be recorded (for
example, at end of outfall pipe). If the outfall is submerged or is inaccessible for
sampling, an upstream sampling location may be required. A description of any
upstream sampling locations is recorded here. Grab samples are collected from the
middle, both vertically and horizontally, of the dry-weather flow discharge in a critically
cleaned glass container. Samples can be collected by manually dipping a sample
container into the flow.
Sampling Procedures: Detailed, step-by-step instructions for using the test strips and kits
are available through the Public Works Department. Please also refer to Chapter
3.3.B.7.b. for test kit safety information. Use the following procedures for all test kit
analyses:
1. Take a grab sample and swirl to ensure that the sample is well mixed.
2. Rinse the sample cup (25ml) twice with distilled water. Next, rinse the sample
cup twice with water from the grab sample.
3. Fill the sample cup to the 25 ml mark, or as required by the instructions for the
test kits. Hold the sample cup at eye level to ensure that measurements are
accurate.
4. Conduct the test kit analyses following the manufacturer’s instructions.
5. Dispose of the sample as follows:
• If no chemical or reagents have been added to the sample, the water can be
poured on the ground.
• If any chemical or reagent is added to the sample, pour the water into a container
marked “Liquid Waste” for proper disposal to a sanitary sewer system at the end
of the day.
6. Rinse the sample cup three times with tap water and dry with a paper towel.
5.3 Storm Water Outfall Inspection Data Form Instructions 5
Flow Chart Procedure:
• If any parameter is outside of the “acceptable range” then an illicit discharge has likely
been found. The tracing procedure is immediately implemented by one of the field
crew. Testing can be stopped, and the second member of the field crew continues with
the inspection by completing Section 7.
• If none of the parameters are outside of the acceptable range, proceed to Section 6.
Section 6: Data Collection for Lab Testing
Determine if the Village’s Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) has adequate staff
capacity to analyze the samples.
• If the WWTP has adequate staff capacity, collect grab samples and provide them to
the WWTP. Note the location of the sample. Label the sample with the outfall ID
number. Proceed to Section 7 while in the field and complete the remainder of
Section 6 after the lab results are available.
• If the WWTP does not currently have adequate capacity, determine if Sections 3 or 4
of the inspection form suggest an illicit discharge.
o If Sections 3 or 4 suggest an illicit discharge contact and outside lab to perform the
testing. Proceed to Section 7 while in the field and complete the remainder of
Section 6 after the lab results are available.
o If Sections 3 or 4 do not suggest an illicit discharge, note the outfall ID number.
Place the outfall on the follow-up inspection log and proceed to Section 7 of the
form. Re-inspect and sample the discharge when the WWTP has adequate
capacity.
Sample Location: The location of the sample is noted. Additionally, the sample is
labeled with the outfall ID number. Use the insert MS4 type’s sampling procedures and
refer to Chapter 3.3.B.7.b. for test kit safety information. . The following additional
items are noted.
1. When you collect any samples you must fill out an Outfall Sampling Report
(Appendix 5.4). The report must document time you arrive on location, take the
sample and get to the plant to drop off the sample.
2. A 500-ml glass bottle sample is used to collect the sample. If you are collecting a
sample that has grease 2-250ml samples taken with a glass container are required.
3. If you use the sampling container that is on a rope, it must be washed with soap
and water after every use.
Parameters: Grab samples and lab testing is performed. After lab results are available
enter the results here.
• If any parameter is outside of the “acceptable range” then an illicit discharge has likely
been found. The tracing procedure should be immediately implemented.
5.3 Storm Water Outfall Inspection Data Form Instructions 6
• If none of the parameters are outside of the acceptable then the investigation can be
closed.
Section 7 Any Non-Illicit Discharge Concerns
Any problems or unusual features are to be entered here. If the outfall appears to be
potentially impacted by inappropriate discharges, this can be recorded here. This section
is to be completed even if no flow is observed.
APPENDIX G
PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING FORM
Update Report
Lake County Stormwater Management Commission
PreConstruction Meeting Report
Date & Time of PreCon
Weather Conditions
24hr Precipitation
SMC Permit # SMC Category Enforcement Officer
USACE Reference # Community Name SMC Inspector
NPDES Permit # Inter-Jurisdictional Local Unit of Government USACE Contact N/A
Project Name Grant / Project Manager N/A
Address / Location: DECI RE
SMC Listed DECI Yes No Inactive
Permitted Plans: Field Contact
SE/SC Contractor
WDP Applicant
Project Description:
In Attendance
Floodplain IWLC WOUS Active / Site Area /
Stage of Construction Not Started Details: Next Inspection
1 As-Built Documentation 2 Digital Plans Received Fees / Deposits Received
3 Invoices / Seed Tags 4 Cofferdam Installation
5 Concrete Washout 6 Construction / R.O.W. Access
7 Construction Sequencing 8 DECI Requirements
9 Detention / Sediment Basin 10 Dewatering / Bypass Pumping
11 Directional Drilling / Contingency 12 Ditch Checks
13 Drain Tile Conformity / Interaction 14 Dust Control / Wind Erosion
15 ECB / TRM Installation 16 Floodplain Disturbance
17 Grading / Earthwork 18 Hydrocarbon Removal
19 Identified Flood Problem Area 20 Inlet Protection
21 NFIP Building Requirements 22 Offsite / Overland Flows
23 Outlet Control Structure 24 Perforated Riser
25 PAM Application 26 SE/SC BMP Maintenance
27 Silt Fence Installation 28 Soil Stockpile Protection
29 Stabilization Requirements 30 Stormwater Management System
31 Streambank/Shoreline Protection 32 Turbidity Curtain / Fence
33 Waste / Trash Containment 34 Wetland Buffers Protected
35 WOUS / IWLC BMP Protection 36 Wetland Impact N/A ac IWLC ac WOUS
Temporary Stabilization
n/a location:
Temporary Measures *or equivalent
ECB/TRM * Notes:
Permanent Stabilization
n/a location:
n/a location:
Permanent Measures *or equivalent
ECB/TRM * Notes:
ECB/TRM * Notes:
Save as DOCM
Save as PDF If you would like to provide feedback regarding the SMC inspection process please go to: (password – survey)
Reset Form www.lakecountyil.gov/Stormwater/Pages/inspectionprocesssurvey-.aspx
SMC PreCon Report 100114.docm
Inspector’s Comments:
Photo #1:
Photo #2:
Photo #3:
Photo #4:
Database Code NS - Not Started Deposits: PreCon $ Inspection $ Deposit Actions No Action
Distribution List Follow up Needed (by SMC)
APPENDIX H
SE/SC INSPECTION FORM
Update Report
Lake County Stormwater Management Commission
Field Observation Report
Project Status
Action / Response Needed
Date & Time of Inspection
Weather Conditions
24hr Precipitation
SMC Permit # SMC Category Enforcement Officer
USACE Reference # Community Name SMC Inspector
NPDES Permit # Inter-Jurisdictional Local Unit of Government USACE Contact N/A
Project Name Grant / Project Manager N/A
Address / Location: DECI RE
SMC Listed DECI Yes No Inactive
Permitted Plans: Field Contact
SE/SC Contractor
WDP Applicant
Project Description:
Floodplain IWLC WOUS Active / Site Area /
In Attendance
Stage of Construction Not Started Details: Next Inspection
1 Cofferdam Installation 2 Concrete Washout
3 Construction / R.O.W. Access 4 Construction Sequencing
5 DECI Requirements 6 Detention / Sediment Basin
7 Dewatering / Bypass Pumping 8 Dewatering NTU Reading = Inflow = Treated
9 Directional Drilling 10 Ditch Checks
11 Drain Tile Conformity 12 Dust Control / Wind Erosion
13 ECB / TRM Installation 14 Floodplain Disturbance
15 Grading / Earthwork 16 Hydrocarbon Removal
17 Inclement Weather Ready 18 Inlet Protection
19 NFIP Building Requirements 20 Offsite / Overland Flows
21 Outlet Control Structure 22 Perforated Riser
23 Polyacrylamide Application *sst 24 SE/SC BMP Maintenance
25 Silt Fence 26 Soil Stockpile Protection
27 Stabilization Measures 28 Stormwater Management System
29 Streambank / Shoreline 30 Target / Native Species
31 Turbidity Curtain / Fence 32 Vegetative Cover %
33 Waste / Trash Containment 34 WOUS / IWLC Protection
a. Not permitted, incorrect, or noncompliant construction activity or sequencing
b. Noncompliant inaction, incompletion, or delay in completion of required measure
c. Failure to install or use, or properly install, or use, as permitted or as acceptable
d. Damaged or destroyed by construction activity, weather, or other means
e. Insufficient routine maintenance or routine repairs requiring correction
f. Additional SE/SC measures are required based on site conditions
g. Erosion, sediment, or dust observed downslope of controls or offsite
h. Erosion, sediment, or dust observed on site beyond acceptable standards
i. Construction debris, or illicit material improperly contained or addressed
j. Suspended sediment / illicit discharge observed offsite *site specific tested
Items noted as Deficient or NonCompliant: None
Project Status Compliant NonCompliance Correction Deadline No Action Required Stop Work Order Issued
Save as DOCM
Save as PDF If you would like to provide feedback regarding the SMC inspection process please go to: (password
Reset Form
SMC Field Report 100114.docm
Inspector’s Comments:
Photo #1:
Photo #3:
Database Code NS - Not Started Deposits
Distribution List
you would like to provide feedback regarding the SMC inspection process please go to: (password
www.lakecountyil.gov/Stormwater/Pages/inspectionprocesssurvey
Photo #2:
Photo #4:
Deposits: PreCon $ Inspection $ Deposit Actions
Follow up Needed (by SMC
you would like to provide feedback regarding the SMC inspection process please go to: (password – survey)
www.lakecountyil.gov/Stormwater/Pages/inspectionprocesssurvey-.aspx
Deposit Actions No Action
by SMC)
APPENDIX I
SAMPLE NOTICE OF VIOLATION LETTERS
Date:
1ST NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Applicant Name
Company
Address
City State Zip
Subject: Project Name
Watershed Development Permit No. ???-??-???
1st Notice of Violation
Dear Permittee:
You are hereby notified of the following violation(s) to your Watershed Development Permit:
Failure to notify the City of Lake Forest prior to construction.
Failure to display Permit placard visible from street.
Failure to install/maintain a non-erosive outlet from the structure to the watercourse (Art. IV, Sec. B.1.j.1.b).
Location(s)
Failure to install/maintain soil erosion and sediment control features prior to the hydrologically disturbing upstream
areas (Art. IV, Sec. B.1.j.1.c).
Location(s)
Failure to install/maintain temporary or permanent seeding (Art. IV, Sec. B.1.j.1.d.).
Location(s)
Failure to install/maintain sod (Art. IV, Sec. B.1.j.1.d.).
Location(s)
Failure to install/maintain erosion control blanket (Art. IV, Sec. B.1.j.1.d.).
Location(s)
Failure to install/maintain silt fence, meeting AASHTO Std. Spec 288-00 (Art. IV, Sec. B.1.j.1.f.i).
Location(s)
Failure to install/maintain sediment traps (Art. IV, Sec. B.1.j.1.f.ii).
Location(s)
Failure to install/maintain sediment basins with perforated filtered riser pipe (Art. IV, Sec. B.1.j.1.f.iii).
Location(s)
Failure to install/maintain storm inlet protection (Art. IV, Sec. B.1.j.1.g).
Location(s)
Failure to route dewatering services through an effective sediment control measure (Art. IV, Sec. B.1.j.1.h).
Location(s)
Page 2 of 2
Failure to install/maintain stabilized construction entrance. Failure to clean right of way/pavement. (Art. IV, Sec.
B.1.j.1.j).
Location(s)
Failure to install/maintain runoff diversion controls (Art. IV, Sec. B.1j.1.m).
Location(s)
Failure to prevent erosion from stockpile, or the placement of stockpile in a flood-prone area, buffer, WOUS or IWLC
(Art. Iv, Sec. B.1j.1.n).
Location(s)
Failure to maintain dust control (Art. IV, Sec. B.2.b.8.e.).
Location(s)
Failure to follow permitted construction sequencing (Art. IV, Sec. B.2.b.8.j).
Location(s)
You must take immediate action and cure all deficiencies identified above within five (5) working days,
or the City of Lake Forest may issue a Stop Work Order or invoke Article VII –Penalties and Legal
Actions of the WDO that provides for up to a $500 fine for each offense each day the violation continues.
Once all deficiencies have been cured, please call our office to schedule a re-inspection. If you have any
questions please contact the (insert contact) at (xxx)xxx-xxxx.
Sincerely,
XX
Enforcement Officer
C:
Summary of Violation Notification Procedure
1st Notice: Village will furnish a Violation Notification to applicant and/or representative via fax and Certified
Mail outlining necessary corrective measures to be completed and re-inspected within 5-working days of said
notification. After which time, if violations are still not corrected, a Red Tag will be issued for the site (i.e. all
work to stop except for activities related to correcting violations).
2nd Notice: Village issues a Red-Tag for the site along with a Conditional Stop Work Order (allowing only
remediation activities) via fax and Certified Mail granting an additional 5-working day deadline to complete
remedial work to cure said WDO violation(s). Fines continue to accrue.
3rd and Final Notice: If corrective measures have not been completed within the period allowed by 2nd Notice,
the Village shall meet with the applicant/developer to discuss the Village’s additional punative actions and the
plan and schedule within which the necessary remedial measures will be completed. Fines continue to accrue
and the Conditional Stop Work Order remains in effect.
NOTE: Building and/or Occupancy Permits and surety reduction requests will be withheld until all
violations are resolved and levied fines are paid.
APPENDIX J
SAMPLE MAINTENANCE PLAN
5.16 Maintenance Plan Template for New Facilities 1
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR NEW FACILITIES
Subject: INSERT DEVELOPMENT NAME HERE
SUCH PROPERTY BEING THE REAL PROPERTY NOW DULY PLATTED AS INSERT
DEVELOPMENT NAME HERE, AS SUCH PLAT IS NOW RECORDED AS DOCUMENT
NO. INSERT DOCUMENT NUMBER, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF DEEDS
OF THE COUNTY OF LAKE, STATE OF ILLINOIS, HEREBY MAKES THE
FOLLOWING DECLARATIONS OF MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES.
Responsibilities
Adequate provisions for maintenance of the stormwater system are an essential aspect of
long-term drainage performance. Responsibility for the overall maintenance shall rest with
the insert responsible party name here.
Purpose and Objective:
Detention and water quality treatment facilities, storm sewers, swales and native
vegetation/buffer areas define a development’s stormwater management system. When land is
altered to build homes and other developments, the natural system of trees and plants is replaced
with impervious surfaces like sidewalks, streets, decks, roofs, driveways, or lawns over highly
compacted soils. As a result more rain water / storm water flows off the land at a faster rate and
less rain water is absorbed into the soil. This can lead to streambank erosion, downstream
flooding and increased concentrations of pollutants. The storm water management system was
designed to help slow the rate of runoff from the development and improve the quality of the
storm water leaving the site.
Interpretation as to Requirements Under This Maintenance Plan:
The requirement for this Maintenance Plan is generated by the Lake County Watershed
Development Ordinance. Therefore, the interpretation of the maintenance requirements set
forth in this Maintenance Plan shall be interpreted on the basis of the intent and
requirements of said Ordinance.
Inspection Frequency:
Inspection experience will determine the required cleaning frequencies for the components
of the stormwater management system. At a minimum, the attached checklist items should
be inspected annually. Detention ponds (including the outlet control structure and
restrictors) should be inspected on a monthly basis during wet weather conditions from
March to November.
5.16 Maintenance Plan Template for New Facilities 2
Maintenance Considerations:
Whenever possible, maintenance activities should be performed during the inspection. These
activities should be supplemented by repair / replacement as required. A Registered
Professional Engineer (PE) shall be hired for design resolution of specific items as indicated
on the checklist below.
Cost Considerations:
Frequent maintenance program work execution will lead to less frequent and less costly long-
term maintenance and repair. The attached checklist items may need to be amended based on
experience recorded over the initial period of occupancy of the subdivision.
Record Keeping:
Separate and distinct records shall be maintained by the responsible party for all tasks
performed associated with this plan. The records shall include the dates of maintenance
visits, who performed the inspection, and a description of the work performed.
, the owner’s agent, has caused these presents to be signed and acknowledged,
this _______ day of ________________, 2_____.
By: ________________________
5.16 Maintenance Plan Template for New Facilities 3
Post-Construction Stormwater Management System
Inspection Checklist
The following checklist describes the suggested routine inspection items and recommended
measures to be taken to ensure that the Stormwater Management System functions as
designed. When hiring a PE is the recommended measure, the PE shall inspect, evaluate
and recommend corrective actions. The General section outlines items that should be taken
into consideration during inspection and maintenance activities. While performing an
overall inspection of your system, please check for the following items.
General -
• Litter and debris shall be controlled.
• Accumulated sediment shall be disposed of properly, along with any wastes generated
during maintenance operations.
• Riprap areas shall be repaired with the addition of new riprap, as necessary, of adequate
size and shape.
• Roads and parking lots shall be swept or vacuumed on a periodic basis.
• Access path to storm water management facilities should be free from obstructions
(woodpiles, sheds, vegetation).
• Fences, gates and posts shall be maintained.
• Signs shall be maintained.
Dams and berms
____ Settlement. If settlement observed, hire a PE.
____ Breaks or failures. If failure observed, notify the Village immediately and hire a PE.
____ Erosion. Repair as needed.
____ Signs of leakage, seepage or wet spots. If observed, hire a PE.
____ Unwanted growth or vegetation. Remove as needed.
Shorelines
____ Erosion or rip-rap failures. Repair as needed
____ Undermining. Stabilize and repair as needed.
Outlet and inlet structure
____ Obstructions blocking outlet pipe, restrictor, channel or spillway. Remove
obstructions immediately.
____ Separation of joints. Repair as needed.
____ Cracks, breaks, or deterioration of concrete. Repair as needed
____ Scour and erosion at outlet. If observed, repair (consider additional or alternative
stabilization methods).
____ Condition of trash racks. Remove any collected debris.
____ Outlet channel conditions downstream. Stabilize soil or remove obstructions as
needed.
5.16 Maintenance Plan Template for New Facilities 4
Storage Volume
____ Facilities shall be inspected to ensure that the constructed volume for detention is
maintained. No sediment, topsoil, or other dumping into the facility shall be
allowed. If a detention facility includes specific locations designed to accumulate
sediment these locations should be dredged every 5-yrs or when 50% of the volume
has been lost.
____ Wet ponds lose 0.5 - 1.0% of their volume annually. Dredging is required when
accumulated volume loss reaches 15%, or approximately every 15-20 years.
Storm Sewers
____ System is free draining into collection channels or catch basins. If concerned, clean
or repair.
____ Catch basins. Remove sediment when more than 50% of basin sump is filled.
____ Siltation in Culvert. Culverts shall be checked for siltation deposit, clean out as
necessary.
Bridges
____ Any scouring around wing walls. Stabilize and repair as needed. If concerned, hire
a PE.
____ Any undermining of footings. Stabilize and repair as needed. If concerned, hire a
PE.
Swales –
____ All ditches or pipes connecting ponds in series should be checked for debris that
may block flow.
____ Repair and replace permanent check-dams as necessary.
____ Verify systems (both drainage ditches and sideyard swales) are maintaining
originally constructed design slope and cross-sectional area. If fill or sediment
contributes to elevation changes in swale, re-grading and re-shaping shall be
performed. Licensed surveyors shall be hired to lay-out and check grades. No
landscaping, earthen fill, gardens, or other obstructions (including sheds and other
structures) shall be allowed in the swales that would impede design drainage flow
patterns.
Vegetated Areas –
____ Need for planting, reseeding or sodding of native areas. Supplement alternative
native vegetation if a significant portion has not established (50% of the surface
area). Reseed with alternative grass species if original grass cover has not
successfully established.
____ Need for planting, reseeding or sodding of turf areas. Supplement alternative native
vegetation if a significant portion has not established (75% of the surface area).
Reseed with alternative grass species if original grass cover has not successfully
established.
5.16 Maintenance Plan Template for New Facilities 5
____ Invasive vegetation (refer to the Native Plant Guide for Streams and Stormwater
Facilities in Northeastern Illinois, or hire an environmental or landscape specialist).
Remove as necessary.
Wetland Buffers –
____ Inspect for evidence of erosion or concentrated flows through or around the buffer.
All eroded areas should be repaired, seeded and mulched. A shallow stone trench
should be installed as a level spreader to distribute flows evenly in any area showing
concentrated flows.
____ All existing undergrowth, forest floor duff layer, and leaf litter must remain
undisturbed except in designated paths or permitted encroachment areas.
____ No tree cutting is allowed except for normal maintenance of dead, diseased and
damaged trees or; the culling of invasive, noxious or non-native species that are to
be replaced by more desirable and native vegetation.
____ A buffer must maintain a dense, complete and vigorous cover of "non-lawn"
vegetation which should not be mowed no more than once a year. Vegetation may
include grass and other herbaceous species as well as shrubs and trees.
____ Use or maintenance activities within the buffer shall be conducted so as to prevent
damage to vegetation and exposure of soil.
5.16 Maintenance Plan Template for Existing Facilities 1
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
ANNUAL MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR EXISTING FACILITIES
Purpose and Objective:
Detention and water quality treatment facilities, storm sewers, swales and native
vegetation/buffer areas define a development’s stormwater management system. When land is
altered to build homes and other developments, the natural system of trees and plants is replaced
with impervious surfaces like sidewalks, streets, decks, roofs, driveways, or lawns over highly
compacted soils. As a result more rain water / storm water flows off the land at a faster rate and
less rain water is absorbed into the soil. This can lead to streambank erosion, downstream
flooding and increased concentrations of pollutants. The existing storm water management
system was designed to help slow the rate of runoff from the development and maintain the
quality of the storm water leaving the site.
Inspection Frequency:
Inspection experience will determine the required cleaning frequencies for the components
of the stormwater management system. At a minimum, the attached checklist items should
be inspected annually. Detention ponds (including the outlet control structure and
restrictors) should be inspected on a monthly basis during wet weather conditions from
March to November.
Maintenance Considerations:
Whenever possible, maintenance activities should be performed during the inspection. These
activities should be supplemented by repair / replacement as required. A Registered
Professional Engineer (PE) shall be hired for design resolution of specific items as indicated
on the checklist below.
Cost Considerations:
Frequent maintenance program work execution will lead to less frequent and less costly long-
term maintenance and repair. The attached checklist items may need to be amended based on
inspection experience.
Record Keeping:
Separate and distinct records should be maintained by the responsible party for all tasks
performed associated with this plan. The records shall include the dates of maintenance
visits, who performed the inspection, and a description of the work performed.
5.16 Maintenance Plan Template for Existing Facilities 2
Post-Construction Stormwater Management System
Inspection Checklist
The following checklist describes the suggested routine inspection items and recommended
measures to be taken to ensure that the Stormwater Management System functions as
designed. When hiring a PE is the recommended measure, the PE shall inspect, evaluate
and recommend corrective actions. The General section outlines items that should be taken
into consideration during inspection and maintenance activities. While performing an
overall inspection of your system, please check for the following items.
General -
• Litter and debris shall be controlled.
• Accumulated sediment shall be disposed of properly, along with any wastes generated
during maintenance operations.
• Riprap areas shall be repaired with the addition of new riprap, as necessary, of adequate
size and shape.
• Roads and parking lots shall be swept or vacuumed on a periodic basis.
• Access path to storm water management facilities should be free from obstructions
(woodpiles, sheds, vegetation).
• Fences, gates and posts shall be maintained.
• Signs shall be maintained.
Storage Facilities (Detention, Retention and Water Quality Treatment Facilities)
Dams and berms
____ Settlement. If settlement observed, hire a PE.
____ Breaks or failures. If failure observed, notify the Village immediately and hire a PE.
____ Erosion. Repair as needed.
____ Signs of leakage, seepage or wet spots. If observed, hire a PE.
____ Unwanted growth or vegetation. Remove as needed.
Shorelines
____ Erosion or rip-rap failures. Repair as needed
____ Undermining. Stabilize and repair as needed.
Outlet and inlet structure
____ Obstructions blocking outlet pipe, restrictor, channel or spillway. Remove
obstructions immediately.
____ Separation of joints. Repair as needed.
____ Cracks, breaks, or deterioration of concrete. Repair as needed
____ Scour and erosion at outlet. If observed, repair (consider additional or alternative
stabilization methods).
____ Condition of trash racks. Remove any collected debris.
5.16 Maintenance Plan Template for Existing Facilities 3
____ Outlet channel conditions downstream. Stabilize soil or remove obstructions as
needed.
Storage Volume
____ Facilities shall be inspected to ensure that the constructed volume for detention is
maintained. No sediment, topsoil, or other dumping into the facility shall be
allowed. If a detention facility includes specific locations designed to accumulate
sediment these locations should be dredged every 5-yrs or when 50% of the volume
has been lost.
____ Wet ponds lose 0.5 - 1.0% of their volume annually. Dredging is required when
accumulated volume loss reaches 15%, or approximately every 15-20 years.
Storm Sewers
____ System is free draining into collection channels or catch basins. If concerned, clean
or repair.
____ Catch basins. Remove sediment when more than 50% of basin sump is filled.
____ Siltation in Culvert. Culverts shall be checked for siltation deposit, clean out as
necessary.
Bridges
____ Any scouring around wing walls. Stabilize and repair as needed. If concerned, hire
a PE.
____ Any undermining of footings. Stabilize and repair as needed. If concerned, hire a
PE.
Swales –
____ All ditches or pipes connecting ponds in series should be checked for debris that
may block flow.
____ Repair and replace permanent check-dams as necessary.
____ Verify systems (both drainage ditches and sideyard swales) are maintaining
originally constructed design slope and cross-sectional area. If fill or sediment
contributes to elevation changes in swale, re-grading and re-shaping shall be
performed. Licensed surveyors shall be hired to lay-out and check grades. No
landscaping, earthen fill, gardens, or other obstructions (including sheds and other
structures) shall be allowed in the swales that would impede design drainage flow
patterns.
Vegetated Areas –
____ Need for planting, reseeding or sodding of native areas. Supplement alternative
native vegetation if a significant portion has not established (50% of the surface
area). Reseed with alternative grass species if original grass cover has not
successfully established.
____ Need for planting, reseeding or sodding of turf areas. Supplement alternative native
vegetation if a significant portion has not established (75% of the surface area).
5.16 Maintenance Plan Template for Existing Facilities 4
Reseed with alternative grass species if original grass cover has not successfully
established.
____ Invasive vegetation (refer to the Native Plant Guide for Streams and Stormwater
Facilities in Northeastern Illinois, or hire an environmental or landscape specialist,
or hire an environmental or landscape specialist). Remove as necessary.
Wetland Buffers –
____ Inspect for evidence of erosion or concentrated flows through or around the buffer.
All eroded areas should be repaired, seeded and mulched. A shallow stone trench
should be installed as a level spreader to distribute flows evenly in any area showing
concentrated flows.
____ All existing undergrowth, forest floor duff layer, and leaf litter must remain
undisturbed except in designated paths or permitted encroachment areas.
____ No tree cutting is allowed except for normal maintenance of dead, diseased and
damaged trees or; the culling of invasive, noxious or non-native species that are to
be replaced by more desirable and native vegetation.
____ A buffer must maintain a dense, complete and vigorous cover of "non-lawn"
vegetation which should not be mowed no more than once a year. Vegetation may
include grass and other herbaceous species as well as shrubs and trees.
____ Use or maintenance activities within the buffer shall be conducted so as to prevent
damage to vegetation and exposure of soil.
APPENDIX K
SPILL RESPONSE NOTICE
This is not a citation.
Stormwater Pollution
Found in Your Area!
This is to inform you that our staff found
the following pollutants in the storm
sewer system in your area. This storm
sewer system leads directly to
Motor oil❑
Oil filters
Antifreeze/
transmission fluid
Paint
Solvent/degreaser
Cooking grease
Detergent
Home improvement waste (concrete,
mortar)
Pet waste
Yard waste (leaves, grass, mulch)
Excessive dirt and
gravel
Trash
Construction debris
Pesticides and
fertilizers
Other
___________________________
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
For more information or to report
an illegal discharge of
pollutants, please call:
WHEN IT RAINS
IT DRAINS
www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater
EPA 833-F-03-002
April 2003
Stormwater runoff is precipitation from rain or
snowmelt that flows over the ground. As it flows,
it can pick up debris,chemicals,dirt,and other
pollutants and deposit them into a storm sewer
system or waterbody.
Anything that enters a storm sewer system is
discharged into the waterbodies we
use for swimming,fishing,and providing
drinking water.
To keep the stormwater leaving your home or
workplace clean,follow these simple guidelines:
Use
pesticides
and fertilizers
sparingly.
Repair auto
leaks.
Dispose of
household
hazardous waste,used auto fluids
(antifreeze,oil,etc.),and batteries at
designated collection or recycling locations.
Clean up after your pet.
Use a commercial car wash or wash your
car on a lawn or other unpaved surface.
Sweep up yard debris rather than hosing
down areas.Compost or recycle yard waste
when possible.
Clean paint brushes in a sink,not outdoors.
Properly dispose of excess paints through a
household hazardous waste collection
program.
Sweep up and
properly
dispose of
construction
debris like
concrete and
mortar.
untreated
Remember:
Only Rain Down the Drain
INFORMATIONAL ITEM:
PUBLIC WORKS CIP PROJECT
STATUS UPDATES
PUBLIC WORKS CIP PROJECT STATUS UPDATES
----INFORMATION ONLY ----
FY21 Capital Fund Projects
Project City Council Approval % Complete Notes
Annual Concrete Sidewalks / Curbs / Repairs 5/4/2020 100%Completed
Annual Pavement Crack Sealing 5/4/2020 100%Completed
Annual Pavement Patching Program 4/20/2020 0%Contractor developing schedule –est. July
Annual Pavement Resurfacing Program 4/20/2020 60%In progress;Laurel Ave. to begin July 6th
Annual Storm Sewer Lining Program 5/4/2020 50%All sewers cleaned; lining begins July 6th
Bridge Inspections & Analyses 5/4/2020 25%Inspections in progress
Conway Farms Drainage Improvement 5/18/2020 100%Completed
Off-Street Parking: Quarta Lot Resurfacing 5/18/2020 0%Construction to begin July 6th
Route 60 Bike Path Phase I Design 5/4/2020 20%Kickoff and site meetings held
Ferry Hall Ravine Washout 11/4/2019 60%Landscape restoration completed Fall 2019
Storm Sewer work begins July 6th
Storm: Non-Ravine Culvert & Ditch Improvements 5/4/2020 75%
Sheridan Rd. -Completed
Illinois & Stonegate -In progress
Mayflower –In progress
Annual Gas Light LED Conversions NA approx.20%Ongoing / finishing VT area
Longline Striping 7/20/2020 0%Seeking Council approval
MSF Resurface Fleet Epoxy Floor 10/5/2020 0%Seeking Council approval
Property Condition Assessments 6/1/2020 10%Kickoff meeting completed
Senior Center HVAC Replacements / Upgrades 9/8/2020 0%Seeking Council approval
Capital Equipment -All Funds January -April 2020 90%90% equipment received
Forest Park Ravine & Bluff Plantings N/A Ongoing Replacement and/or additional as needed
Concrete -Compost Center & MS 5/4/2020 50%Concrete to be poured July 6th
FP Bluff: Pre-Design Mod Risk Areas & Monitoring 5/4/2020 20%Kickoff & multiple site visits held
All prior AECOM data provided
Rosemary Ravine 6/1/2020 30%In progress
Ells
Martin
Thomas
Lockefeer
PUBLIC WORKS CIP PROJECT STATUS UPDATES
----INFORMATION ONLY ----
FY21 Water Fund Projects
Project City Council
Approved Project Completed %Notes
Manhole Lining and I&I Repairs 5/18/2020 5%Pre-construction meeting held July 2nd
Construction begins July 13th
Annual Sanitary Sewer Lining Program 5/4/2020 50%All sewers cleaned; lining begins July 6th
Water Meter Replacement Study NA 0%Coordinating kickoff meeting
Watermain Replacement Prioritization Plan 6/15/2020 0%Agreement being finalized
Water Distribution Study & Analysis 6/15/2020 0%Agreement being finalized
Water Plant Roof Repair 8/3/2020 0%Proposals received July 2nd
Finished and Raw Water Pump Performance Rebuilds 8/3/2020 0%Reviewing proposals
Remote Station PLC Upgrades 9/8/2020 0%Developing RFP
Spruce Lift Station Pump Overhaul 8/3/2020 0%Reviewing proposals
Ells
Martin
ACTION ITEM:
APPROVAL OF THE MAY 26,
2020 PUBLIC WORKS
COMMITTEE MEETING
MINUTES
1
SPECIAL PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING
TUESDAY, MAY 26, 2020 – 2:00 P.M.
REMOTE ACCESS MEETING
MINUTES
ROLL CALL/CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Raymond Buschmann called the virtual meeting to order at 2:00 P.M.
Aldermen Ted Notz and Jim Preschlack were present.
Staff virtually attending the meeting included Michael Thomas, Director of Public Works;
Dan Martin, Superintendent of Public Works; Bob Ells, Superintendent of Engineering;
Jason Wicha, City Manager; Brian Joyce, Engineering Supervisor and Jim Lockefeer,
Management Analyst.
Chairman Buschmann welcomed both Alderman Notz and Alderman Preschlack as
new Public Works Committee members.
INFORMATIONAL ITEM
I. FY21 STUDY ON ADVANCE METERING INFRASTRUCTURE “AMI” WATER METER
REPLACEMENTS / WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM / WATERMAIN PRIORITIZATION
REPLACEMENT PLAN – DAN MARTIN
Superintendent Martin reviewed the below summary presentation slide on the
topic.
Director Thomas explained that having these studies substantially completed by
the end of September is important for CIP planning and budgeting.
2
The Committee and staff discussed approaches to replacing water meters
Citywide, water meter technologies, battery life of the current meters, and
anticipated water distribution system impacts with the new hotel constructed in
the Conway Business Park
ACTION ITEMS
II. APPROVAL OF THE APRIL 28, 2020 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
Chairman Buschmann inquired about the format of the April 28, 2020 meeting
minutes. Management Analyst Jim Lockefeer explained that for Committee
meeting topics that have one or two summary slides he will look to incorporate
those summary slides as screenshots directly into the minutes. He explained that
for topics that contain three or more slides he would continue to write out a
summary instead of incorporating those slides directly into the minutes. He
explained that incorporating summary slides allow him to be more efficient in
drafting the minutes. Chairman Buschmann explained that he was comfortable
with this direction.
Chairman Buschmann noted a date error in the minutes on page 13 and
requested that it was corrected.
Alderman Preschlack moved to approve the April 28, 2020 Public Works
Committee meeting minutes subject to Chairman Buschmann’s requested edit.
Alderman Notz seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
III. REVIEW AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL THE ROSEMARY RAVINE
PROJECT BID – JIM LOCKEEFER
Mr. Lockefeer reviewed the below two summary presentation slides on the topic.
He explained that a draft City Council write-up on the topic was also included in
the meeting packet.
3
The Committee and staff discussed the updated design and V3 Construction
Group’s ravine construction experience.
Alderman Preschlack moved to recommend approval to City Council award of
the Rosemary Ravine Project to V3 Construction Group in the amount of $509,650
to include authorization for a 10% contingency for a total of $560,615. Alderman
Notz seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
IV. REVIEW AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL THE FACILITIES
CONDITION ASSESSMENT & MAINTENANCE PROPOSAL – DAN MARTIN
Superintendent Martin reviewed a presentation on the topic. He explained that
a draft City Council write-up on the topic was also included in the meeting
packet.
Superintendent Martin provided a detailed overview of the project scope and
project budget. He explained the request for proposal (RFP) process staff
initiated to solicit firm proposals to meet the project scope. He explained that the
process was very competitive and that the City received 13 proposals from
qualified firms. Superintendent Martin reviewed the staff RFP review process that
included firm interviews. He reviewed the below evaluation/cost table.
4
Superintendent Martin explained that Bureau Veritas submitted the overall
strongest proposal. He explained that the staff review team was very impressed
with Bureau Veritas asset management program, comprehensive facility
summary reporting, and benchmarking analysis. He reviewed a tentative
schedule for the first year.
The Committee and staff discussed the buildings included in this assessment
process, the proposed tentative schedule, how the reports will be utilized for CIP
planning purposes, Bureau Veritas local presence, and the selection of Bureau
Veritas and their proposal cost. Chairman Buschmann recommended that the
City Council write-up include language identifying Bureau Veritas as not
submitting the overall lowest cost proposal and the added benefits in selecting
their firm to the City.
Alderman Preschlack moved to recommend approval to City Council award of
the Facilities Condition Assessment & Maintenance Proposal to Bureau Veritas in
an amount of $83,476 over a two-year period. Alderman Notz seconded the
motion, which carried unanimously.
V. REVIEW AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL THE COMPOST CENTER’S
YARDWASTE OPERATIONS AGREEMENT – DAN MARTIN
Superintendent Martin reviewed the below summary presentation slide on the
topic.
5
The Committee and staff discussed the two additional one-year options, other
community yardwaste models, the uniqueness of the City’s Compost Center,
and the process of transferring the City’s yardwaste by the contractor.
Alderman Preschlack moved to recommend approval to City Council award of
a three-year agreement with an option for two, one-year extensions for the
Compost Center’s Yardwaste Transfer Agreement to Thelen Materials. Alderman
Notz seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
VI. REVIEW AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL THE WATER PLANT
CONSULTING SERVICES PROPOSAL – DAN MARTIN
Superintendent Martin reviewed the below summary presentation slide on the
topic.
VII.
6
The Committee and staff discussed the decision to select two firms to provide
consulting services, and the fee schedules/rates submitted by the firms included
in their agreements.
Alderman Preschlack moved to recommend approval to City Council award of
three-year agreements to Donohue & Associates, Inc. and Strand Associates,
Inc. to provide consulting services for components of the Lake Forest
Ultrafiltration Membrane Water Plant. Alderman Notz seconded the motion,
which carried unanimously.
VIII. REVIEW AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL THE CONTRACT FOR IDOT
RTE. 41 & DEERPATH IMPROVEMENT – MIKE THOMAS
Director Thomas reviewed a project map of the area and the below summary
presentation slide on the topic.
The Committee and staff discussed IDOT’s property rights, the City Attorney’s
Office review of the contract, the project schedule following both the City’s and
State’s approval of the contract, and the State’s reimbursement process.
Alderman Preschlack moved to recommend approval to City Council the
contract for IDOT Rte. 41 & Deerpath Improvement Project. Alderman Notz
seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
PUBLIC COMMENT
There was no additional public comment.
NEXT MEETING
The Committee agreed to meet next on July 8, 2020 at 2 P.M. The Committee
had discussions about meeting length going forward.
7
ADJOURNMENT
Alderman Preschlack moved to adjourn the meeting of the Public Works
Committee at 3:53 P.M. Alderman Notz seconded the motion, which carried
unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
Jim Lockefeer Jr.
Management Analyst
ACTION ITEM:
REVIEW AND RECOMMEND
APPROVAL TO CITY
COUNCIL THE FY21 LONG
LINE STRIPING PROGRAM
FY21 LONG LINE STRIPING PROGRAM
•FY21 project budget -$94,000
•Suburban Purchasing Cooperative (SPC) joint bid
•The 2020 SPC/IDOT thermoplastic lane marking contract was awarded to
Superior Road Striping, Inc. of Melrose Park
•Lane marking specifications meet Illinois IDOT standards
•Pricing / terms & conditions remain the same as FY20 contract (extended due
to COVID -19 impacts)
•City’s Long Line Striping Program is split into 4 zones (includes all streets,
parking lots and crosswalks)
•Zone 1 completed in 2019
•Zone 2 to be completed in 2020
•Staff recommends awarding the FY21 Long Line Striping Program to
Superior Road Striping, Inc. in the amount of $94,000
Description UOM 2019
Cost per Unit
2020
Cost per Unit
4” Line LF $0.52 $0.52
6” Line LF $0.76 $0.76
12” Line LF $1.52 $1.52
24” Line LF $3.78 $3.78
Letters & Symbols SF $3.51 $3.51
Removal SF $0.41 $0.41
SUBJECT: Award the Thermoplastic Lane Marking contract to Superior Road Striping, Inc.
in the amount of $94,000.00.
STAFF CONTACT: DAN MARTIN, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (810-3561)
PURPOSE AND ACTON REQUESTED: Staff requests approval to award the contract for
thermoplastic lane marking to Superior Road Striping.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The City of Lake Forest, as a member of the Northwest
Municipal Conference (NWMC), also belongs to the Suburban Purchasing Cooperative
(SPC). The SPC is made up of 134 communities in the Northwest Municipal Conference,
the South Suburban Mayors and Managers Association, the DuPage Mayors
Conference, and the Will County Government League.
One of SPC’s annual joint purchasing initiatives is the thermoplastic lane marking bid for
member agencies. The City has been participating in the thermoplastic lane marking
for the last 19 years. SPC’s lane marking specifications meet Illinois Department of
Transportation (IDOT) standards. Bids and selection of the lowest responsible and
responsive bidder are approved by IDOT.
The 2020 SPC/IDOT thermoplastic lane marking contract was awarded to Superior Road
Striping, Inc. of Melrose Park, Illinois. The table below shows the unit price cost of the
contract that City Council approved in 2019. Due to extraordinary circumstances in the
time of COVID 19, the Suburban Purchasing Cooperative Governing Board has
decided that it is in the best interest of our members to extend the SPC 2020
Thermoplastic Lane Marking Contract #158 to Superior Road Striping, Melrose Park, IL
from April 12, 2020 through April 11, 2021, with no price increases.
Under this contract, Superior Road Striping agrees to all terms and conditions as set forth
in the specifications contained within the contract and Superior Road Striping must
comply with all IDOT rules and regulations.
Description UOM 2019
Cost per Unit
2020
Cost per Unit
4” Line LF $0.52 $0.52
6” Line LF $0.76 $0.76
12” Line LF $1.52 $1.52
24” Line LF $3.78 $3.78
Letters & Symbols SF $3.51 $3.51
Removal SF $0.41 $0.41
BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT: The City of Lake Forest’s thermoplastic lane marking zones are
split into four. Zone 1 (east of McKinley rd.) which includes all streets, parking lots and
crosswalks was completed in 2019.
This year, the City is requesting 134,584 linear feet of thermoplastic pavement marking
to zone 2 (east of RT. 41) which includes 4”, 6”, 12”, and 24” wide lines, as well as various
letters and symbols. The total cost for the Lake Forest’s 2020 contract for striping and
marking will be $94,000.
Has competitive pricing been obtained for proposed goods/services? No
If no, indicate the specific exception requested: Administrative Directive 3-5, Section
6.1D – Government Joint Purchases
The FY2021 budget allocation for the lane marking program is $94,000 from the Capital
Improvement Fund:
FY2021 Funding Source Amount
Budgeted
Amount
Requested
Budgeted?
Y/N
311-5103-467.67-22 $94,000 $94,000 Y
COUNCIL ACTION: Award the Thermoplastic Lane Marking contract to Superior Road
Striping, Inc. in the amount of $94,000.00.
PUBLIC COMMENT
NEXT MEETING:
SEPTEMBER 23
ADJOURNMENT