CITY COUNCIL 2016/10/17 AgendaTHE CITY OF LAKE FOREST
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Monday, October 17, 2016 at 6:30 pm
City Hall Council Chambers
Honorable Mayor, Donald Schoenheider
Catherine Waldeck, Alderman First Ward Stanford Tack, Alderman Third Ward
Prudence R. Beidler, Alderman First Ward Jack Reisenberg, Alderman Third Ward
George Pandaleon, Alderman Second Ward Michael Adelman, Alderman Fourth Ward
Timothy Newman, Alderman Second Ward Michelle Moreno, Alderman Fourth Ward
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Immediately following the Finance Committee Meeting
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS
1. COMMENTS BY MAYOR
A. ComEd Smart Meter Update
A copy of ComEd’s Smart Meter Update can be found on page 13
2. COMMENTS BY CITY MANAGER
A. DesPlaines River Challenge
-Ann Maine, President of Lake County Forest Preserve and Lake
County Board Member
B. Comments regarding the issuance of Demolition Permits and other
Development Related Perceptions.
3. COMMENTS BY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FINANCE COMMITTEE
A. Acknowledge Receipt of the FY2016 Treasurer’s Report
PRESENTED BY: George Pandaleon, Finance Committee Chairman
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Staff requests that the City Council acknowledge
receipt of the Fiscal Year 2016 Treasurer’s Report.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Illinois Statute, a Treasurer’s Report must be filed
with the City Clerk, the County Clerk, and published in a Lake Forest newspaper within six
1
Monday, October 17, 2016 City Council Agenda
months after the end of each fiscal year. The report will be published in the October 20,
2016, edition of the Lake Forester. The report may be found beginning on page 14.
BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
COUNCIL ACTION: Acknowledge receipt of the FY2016 Treasurer’s Report
B. Consideration of an Ordinance Providing for the Redemption and Payment Prior
to Maturity of $6,105,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2008 (First Reading)
PRESENTED BY: Elizabeth Holleb, Finance Director (847-810-3612)
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Staff requests City Council consideration of an
Ordinance authorizing redemption of 2008 GO Bonds maturing December 15, 2017
through December 15, 2027 on December 15, 2016.
PROJECT REVIEW/RECOMMENDATIONS:
Reviewed Date Comments
Finance Committee 12/1/2014
Initial discussion of using Laurel Avenue
proceeds to redeem existing bonds to
save interest and provide future funding
for CIP.
Finance Committee 11/9/2015 Continued discussion of this option
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: In April 2008, the City Council authorized issuance of $9.75
million in General Obligation Bonds. The majority of the bond proceeds - $8 million – was
used to finance a portion of the costs of constructing a new municipal services facility.
The bonds mature on December 15 of each year 2009 through 2027 bearing interest rates
of 3.375% to 3.875%. The bonds maturing December 15, 2017 and later are subject to
redemption prior to maturity at the option of the City on December 15, 2016 or any date
thereafter, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount to be redeemed.
Notice of redemption must be mailed between 30 and 60 days prior to the date fixed for
redemption.
The City Council has previously considered using proceeds of the sale of property at
Laurel and Western to redeem these bonds. Such redemption would save on future
interest costs, reduce the debt service levy and allow for the inclusion of a Capital
Improvements levy each year to increase pay-as-you-go funding of the City’s Five Year
Capital Improvements Program (CIP).
With the sale of the Laurel and Western Avenue property having closed on September
23, the City has received $5,615, 219. The total amount required to redeem all bonds
maturing December 15, 2017 and later would be $6,105,000, plus the costs to accomplish
the redemption estimated at $5,000. It is recommended that the City Council consider
using fund balances reserves in the 2008 GO Bonds Debt Service Fund and the General
Fund of approximately $500,000 to accomplish the redemption of all eligible bonds.
2
Monday, October 17, 2016 City Council Agenda
BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT: Land sale proceeds of $5,615,219, plus fund balance reserves in
the 2008 GO Bonds Debt Service Fund and the General Fund of approximately $500,000,
would be used to redeem all outstanding 2008 GO Bonds maturing December 15, 2017
and later (total of $6,105,000) and to pay the costs of redemption. The estimated 2016
property tax levy would be reduced by $822,000 with the option to include this amount
instead for Capital Improvements. This action would save $1.357 million in future interest
costs.
COUNCIL ACTION: Consider granting first reading of an Ordinance (page 20) authorizing
redemption of 2008 GO Bonds maturing December 15, 2017 through December 15, 2027
on December 15, 2016.
4. OPPORTUNITY FOR CITIZENS TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL ON NON-AGENDA
ITEMS
5. ITEMS FOR OMNIBUS VOTE CONSIDERATION
1. Approval of the October 3, 2016 City Council Meeting Minutes
A copy of the minutes can be found on page 28
COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of the Minutes
2. Award of contract for professional services consultation on the purchase of a
new Electronic Data Management System.
STAFF CONTACT: Elizabeth Holleb, Director of Finance/IT (847-810-3612)
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Staff requests City Council award a contract for
professional services to lead The City of Lake Forest through the process of analysis and
possible replacement of our current Electronic Data Management system (EDMS).
PROJECT REVIEW/RECOMMENDATIONS:
Milestone Date Comments
RFP Issuance 08/04/2016
Vendor Proposals Submitted 09/02/2016 Three Proposals Received & Reviewed
Consultant Interviews &
Other Due Diligence 09/10 – 09/30/2016 Review & Recommendation by City
Departments’ Selection Team
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The City of Lake Forest has utilized Fortis software for
electronic document storage for approximately 15 years. We received notification early
3
Monday, October 17, 2016 City Council Agenda
in 2016 that the Fortis software is being phased out, with end of life on December 31,
2017. At this time, the parent company, DocuWare, will no longer support this software.
Although we have the option of migrating to document storage software provided by
DocuWare with no software licensing cost, there are associated costs of project
management, conversion, training, and on-going maintenance. Additional issues add
complexity to the decision process:
1. Complexity and age of City’s current Financial software
2. Upcoming end of life of the Financial system IBM iSeries hardware and operating system
3. Possible Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system purchase planned for Fiscal 2020, which
may contain options overlap
4. Upcoming implementation of work orders software, which may contain options overlap.
City staff recommend taking this opportunity to engage the services of a qualified
professional that will provide direction and support, and lead us through a
comprehensive needs and options analysis to address these issues in the most efficient
and cost-effective manner. This would also offer the benefit of reducing software
redundancy and overlap, and take advantage of best practices to improve efficiency
resulting in a right- sized enterprise wide software solution plan that meets the operational
needs of the entire City.
The selected consultants will provide project management utilizing a proven
methodology and set of related tools intended to mitigate risk during this project. Using
their expertise in the Public Sector and existing best practices for software selection, they
will guide staff through several phases to determine the best course of action for
replacing Fortis, keeping an eye on the future needs of an ERP system.
Phase 1 will lead The City through a comprehensive needs and options analysis.
If it is determined that migrating to another product is the best course of action after
Phase 1, the consultant will continue through Phase 2, which includes assistance with the
creation of a detailed required features and functions list and RFP for submission in a
format that will ease vendor analysis. Phase 3 will guide staff through the software
selection process. By taking advantage of the additional $3,600 for contract negotiation
(Phase 4), they will also assure the best price possible for selected software.
Phases 2 through 4 are optional based on the outcome of Phase 1 – needs and options
analysis.
This process will help ensure the selection of EDMS software that will allow migration of
current documents to the best product at this time, keeping in mind a future ERP system.
This will position The City to enhance service delivery and citizen engagement, increase
employee productivity, decrease employee response time and improve availability of
information. All analysis and reports from Phase1 will remain relevant as we move into
future ERP system analysis.
Consultant Selection Process:
The City issued a Request for Proposals on August 4th, 2016. Staff received three (3)
proposals for this project, as follows:
Company Proposal Amount
Wild Goose Enterprises $57,186
4
Monday, October 17, 2016 City Council Agenda
Plante Moran $42,075
Client First $37,550
A committee comprised of representatives from Finance, Fire, The Office of the City
Manager, and IT narrowed the selection to two candidates based on experience and
knowledge of EDMS using a standard set of criteria. These two candidates were
interviewed starting on September 19th, 2016, and a finalist was selected by the
committee based upon price, expertise, references, understanding of City needs, and
completeness of proposal.
BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT: Plante Moran’s proposal met all of the required project
specifications. Their assigned professional staff made positive impressions on the
selection team during the interview, and references gave favorable responses.
It was determined that Plante Moran’s market knowledge and expertise in the area of
EDMS and ERP were excellent. Plante Moran also offered several phases of the project
with relevant costs. Proposed cost phases are attached on page 41.
FY2017 Funding Source Amount
Budgeted
Amount
Requested
Budgeted?
Y/N
*IT Capital $144,000 $42,075 N
*Due to efficiencies from other IT Capital projects
While EDMS consulting services were not anticipated and specifically budgeted in the
FY2017 budget, funds in the IT Capital budget are proposed to be reallocated to this
project.
COUNCIL ACTION: If appropriate and should the City Council desire, award a contract to
Plante Moran for professional services in the not to exceed amount of $42,075 for
consulting services in developing a comprehensive needs and options analysis report
with the possibility of selecting an Electronic Data Management System, including
contract negotiations
3. Approval of the purchase of computer workstations, laptops and iPads for all
City departments as budgeted in FY2017 Capital Plan
STAFF CONTACT: Elizabeth Holleb, Director of Finance/IT (847-810-3612)
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Staff requests approval to purchase 35 desktop
computers, 9 laptops, and 14 iPads. The project is to replace computers based on a 5
year replacement cycle for workstations and laptops, and a 3 year replacement cycle
for iPads.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The City has 35 desktop computers, 9 laptops, and 14 iPads
recommended for replacement in FY2017. All desktops, laptops, and iPads are
considered end of life (EOL) as they no longer have a warranty and most are starting to
report reduced performance when performing common tasks. The oldest computers of
this proposed replacement are 5 years old, with the average being 5 years old. The
5
Monday, October 17, 2016 City Council Agenda
City’s current inventory of computers consists of 180 desktops, 46 laptops, 36 Toughbooks
and 43 iPads.
Replacement computers for the EOL Fire Toughbooks are also budgeted for this fiscal
year. The Fire department and IT are currently evaluating alternative options for
replacement and purchasing approval will be requested at a later date.
The proposed replacement desktop and laptop computers include higher efficiency /
energy savings with Energy Smart power settings and a high-efficiency power supply.
According to Dell’s Energy Savings Calculator, the City would save approximately
1,014kWh annually. Additionally, performance increases of 92.32% can be realized in
processing speeds based on independent benchmark studies between the proposed
computing platform and the oldest proposed replaced workstation.
The City standardized all desktops and laptops with Dell products 16 years ago. The
standardizations help staff to efficiently deploy, troubleshoot, and maintain the systems.
Dell provides the City with government contract pricing based on the Midwestern Higher
Education Compact (MHEC) contract pricing, Contract MHEC-07012015. This year the
City received pricing from three vendors: CDW, Dell, and SHI. CDW provided a quote that
was 7% lower than the MHEC pricing.
BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT: Staff received the following pricing for this project:
Vendor Total Amount
Dell Workstations and Laptops
SHI $41,307
Dell (MHEC) $ 34,042
CDW $31,552
Vendor Total Amount
Apple iPads
Apple MSRP $11,346
Verizon $11,200
Netrix $10,876
CDW $10,776
Costs are budgeted as follows:
FY2017 Funding Source Amount
Budgeted
Amount
Requested
Budgeted?
Y/N
IT Capital
311-0050-415.66-11 $56,452 $42,328 Y
COUNCIL ACTION: If determined to be appropriate by the City Council, approve the
purchase of 35 desktops and 9 laptops from CDW for $31,552 and 14 iPads from CDW in
the amount of $10,776.
6
Monday, October 17, 2016 City Council Agenda
4. Award of Bid for a Generator Maintenance Contract Included in the F.Y. 2017 -
2019 Operating Budgets
STAFF CONTACT: Dan Martin, Superintendent of Public Works (810-3561)
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Staff is requesting City Council’s approval to award
the bid for a Generator Maintenance Contract to Steiner Electric Company, the lowest
responsible bidder. The three year contract will encompass multiple City generators
including twice a year maintenance and annual load bank testing.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: In 2013, the City entered into a three year contract with
Patton Industries along with seven other municipalities through the Municipal Partnering
Incentive. The 2013 contract was extended by one year before it was rebid in 2016. The
City has twelve emergency generator located at eleven buildings around the city. The
contract includes biannual maintenance and annual load bank testing for all units. Also
included in the contract are set prices for repair work over the life of the contract.
BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT: The Generator Maintenance Contract Proposal followed the
public bid process. The City of Lake Forest participated in the Municipal Partnering
Incentive (MPI) for this bid process along with The Village of Glenview, The Village of
Algonquin, The Village of Winnetka, The Village of Lincolnshire, The Village of Mount
Prospect, and The Village of Northbrook. The invitation to bid was advertised in the
newspaper; six contractors attended the pre bid-meeting and were allowed to tour of all
the facilities as needed. Each bidder received a bid packet including specifications and
each municipality’s maintenance schedule for each generator.
Gateway Industrial Power Inc. was the apparent lowest bidder, but was disqualified
based on the following: the inability to meet the minimum requirement for the length of
years for providing generator service, which is five years. Gateway’s closest service
facility is over three hours away, resulting in higher travel costs and unacceptable
emergency response times. Steiner Electric Company met all of the requirements and
was the lowest responsible bidder. The City of Lake Forest has used Steiner Electric
Company prior to the first contract and it’s work quality was always high.
On May 26, 2016, staff received the following bids for this contract:
Company FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 Total
Gateway
Industrial Power
Inc.
$20,660.00 $20,660.00 $21,440.00 $62,760.00
Disqualified
Steiner Electric
Company $20,905.00 $21,261.00 $21,630.00 $63,796.00
Interstate Power
Systems $21,615.00 $21,615.00 $23,025.00 $66,255.00
Patton Industries
Inc. $22,050.00 $22,655.00 $23,277.00 $67,982.00
Cummins Power $25,572.00 $26,351.00 $27,154.00 $79,077.00
7
Monday, October 17, 2016 City Council Agenda
Lionheart $30,866.00 $30,866.00 $30,866.00 $92,598.00
Generator Maintenance Contract:
FY2017 -19
Funding
Source
Account Number Account Requested Budgeted?
Y / N
Operating Budget Multiple Accounts $63,796.00 Y
COUNCIL ACTION: Award of bid to Steiner Electric Company in the amount of $63,796.00
for the Generator Maintenance contract for a term of three years at multiple City
Buildings.
5. Award of Bid for the McCormick Ravine Stormwater Improvement Project
STAFF CONTACT: Michael Thomas, Director of Public Works (810-3540)
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Award of bid for the restoration of a section of the
McCormick Ravine. The work involves the installation of a rock check dam, excavation,
regrading, erosion control measures, and ancillary drainage improvements.
PROJECT REVIEW/RECOMMENDATIONS:
Reviewed Date Comments
Public Works Committee 10/10/’16 Reviewed & Approved
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The ravines of southern Lake Michigan play a critical role in
protecting the water quality of the lake, preventing sediment runoff, protecting beaches,
and provide countless benefits to wildlife. Over the past decade, the overall importance
these ravines play in protecting Lake Michigan water quality has become well
understood. When restored and healthy, ravines are an integral part of the community’s
character and differentiate Lake Forest from other northern Illinois communities.
Starting in late 2015, The City of Lake Forest and Lake Forest Open Lands Association
(LFOLA) jointly engaged in a $3.6 million restoration of the McCormick Ravine through the
federal Great Lakes Fishery and Ecosystem Restoration (GLFER hereafter) Program. The
project is currently underway and is being overseen by the United States Army Corps of
Engineers, Chicago District. The majority of the heavy construction and earthwork is now
completed. The final step will include planting native species and controlling undesirable
vegetative growth. To accommodate for this plant growth, the contract terms are for
five years with an estimated completion in 2020.
In addition to the GLFER Project, a second project is underway at McCormick Ravine
involving the removal and restoration of an old Army landfill located on both the U.S.
Army Reserve site and City property. This project is being overseen by the United States
Army Corps of Engineers, Louisville District. To date, all of the contaminated material has
8
Monday, October 17, 2016 City Council Agenda
been removed and land restoration is now underway. The ravine will be restored to its
natural condition providing stable slopes to the ravine bottom. Restoration efforts will be
consistent with the GLFER project area.
McCormick Ravine also plays a large role in conveying stormwater from both the
Whispering Oaks and Villa Turicum subdivisions. If not managed properly, stormwater
discharges can have devastating impacts on the ravine system. The proposed City
project will supplement the two other projects currently underway and address some of
the issues associated with the impact of stormwater on McCormick Ravine. The work for
this project is directly adjacent to the landfill removal project and also falls within the
GLFER Project area. Because this project addresses stormwater management, this work
did not fall within the scope of either of the Army Corp’s projects.
The proposed project involves the installation of a water inlet control structure, rock
check dams, excavation and grading of eroded areas, and seeding of the finished
slopes. These repairs will assist in dispersing the energy associated with high volume
water flows after large storm events, stabilize steep slopes, and reduce future erosion. The
project is also designed to be consistent with the GLFER project specifications. Attached
on page 43 of this agenda is a map of the project area, pictures showing the existing
ravine, and areas in the ravine that were restored this summer.
As a side note, City staff will request funding to repair the portion of McCormick Ravine
immediately adjacent to Sheridan Road next fiscal year. That repair is estimated to cost
approximately $150,000.
BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT: The project’s bid opening occurred on October 6, 2016. The
following five bids were received:
Bidder Bid Amount
John Keno & Co., Inc. $74,713
Copenhaver Construction, Inc. $80,300
V3 Construction Group $109,451
Kovilic Construction Co., Inc. $114,000
DiMeo $146,725
The low bidder for the project, John Keno & Co., has considerable experience with ravine
repairs and improvements and has completed many similar projects within Lake Forest.
In addition, John Keno & Co. is already on site performing work for the U.S. Army Corps.
landfill project. If approved by City Council, the project is expected to begin in late
October and be completed within one month, weather depending.
Below is an estimated summary of the project budget:
9
Monday, October 17, 2016 City Council Agenda
FY ’17 Funding
Source Amount Budgeted Amount Requested Budgeted?
Y/N
Capital Fund $75,000 $74,713 Y
COUNCIL ACTION: Award of bid for the McCormick Ravine Stormwater Improvement
Project to John Keno & Co., in the amount of $74,713. In addition, staff is requesting
approval for a contingency amount of 10% for any unforeseen circumstances that may
arise during construction. Any overage in the budget amount will be covered by savings
realized in other FY ’17 capital improvement projects.
6. Consideration of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 95 of the City Code, as
Recommended by City Staff. (Final Approval)
STAFF CONTACT: Margaret Boyer, City Clerk (847.810.3674)
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Staff requests final approval of amendments to Chapter 95
of the City Code. On September 6, 2016, City Council granted first reading of the proposed
changes. A black line copy of the proposed Ordinance showing recommended changes to
the current Code relating to Chapter 95 (Health and Sanitation) of Title IX (General Regulations)
is also included in the Council packet beginning on page 46.
BACKGROUND: The proposed amendment to the code updates provisions where that are
outdated, conform certain provisions to State law, and align City practices with the terms
of the City Code and the interest rate that should apply to unpaid costs and other fees
(such as third-party service fees and attorneys’ fees) incurred by City in connection with
the correction or abatement of public nuisances on private property. Additionally pursuant
to City Code, any proposed change in fees requires two readings by the City Council.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 95 of the City Code, as
Recommended by City Staff. (Final Approval)
COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of the six (6) Omnibus items as presented
6. ORDINANCES
7. ORDINANCES AFFECTING CODE AMENDMENTS
10
Monday, October 17, 2016 City Council Agenda
1. Consideration of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 116 of the City Code, as
Recommended by City Staff. (First Reading)
PRESENTED BY: Victor Filippini, City Attorney
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Staff requests approval of an amendment to the City Code
pertaining to Title XI- Business Regulations -- Chapter 116 – Pawn Brokers.
On January 20, 2015, City Council granted final approval of an Ordinance adopting an
updated City Code. As a follow up, City Staff and the City Attorney have begun to
review certain provisions of the code to determine whether changes are required to
reflect changes in practices or policies of the City.
As part of that review, the City Manager, Executive Staff, the City Council Liaison, and the City
Attorney have reviewed the City Code provisions relating to Title XI- Business Regulations --
Chapter 116 Pawn Broker. The proposed blacklined amendment to the City Code relating to
the code is included in the Council packet beginning on page 56.
BACKGROUND: The proposed amendment attempts to update provisions where they are
outdated, comply with State law and align City practices with the terms of the City Code.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of an Ordinance Amending Title XI- Business Regulations-
Chapter 116 of the City Code, as Recommended by City Staff. (First Reading)
2. Consideration of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 156 of the City Code, as
Recommended by the Plan Commission. (First Reading)
PRESENTED BY: Catherine Czerniak,
Director of Community Development - 847-810-3504
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Consideration of a recommendation from the Plan
Commission in support of amendments to Chapter 156 of the City Code, Subdivisions.
BACKGROUND: On January 20, 2015, the City Council approved an Ordinance adopting
an updated City Code. As a follow up, various Boards and Commissions, City staff and
the City Attorney’s office are in the process of reviewing each chapter of the Code and
recommending revisions to 1) reflect current practices and policies, and 2) to provide
clarification, general clean-up of language and reorganization where appropriate. The
amendments presented at this time do not involve substantive changes to the Code.
As part of the overall review of the Code, the Plan Commission conducted a public
hearing to consider amendments to Chapter 156, Subdivisions, in May, 2016. Importantly,
the Subdivision Chapter was substantially reviewed and revised by the Plan Commission
in 2011, under the direction of past Plan Commission Chairman Reisenberg. As a result,
the Commission’s recent review found this Chapter to be generally up to date and
reflective of current procedures, laws and processes. The Plan Commission
recommendation reflects only minor revisions, clarifications and edits. One clarification
of note is that the proposed Code language now spells out that the City Council, when
11
Monday, October 17, 2016 City Council Agenda
accepting public improvements constructed by a developer as part of a subdivision, will
do so by Resolution. In the past, the Council has accepted improvements simply by
motion. Acceptance of improvements by Resolution will document more fully the
Council’s actions and any conditions, findings or limitations that may be applicable.
As a follow up to the Plan Commission’s work, Alderman Adelman also reviewed the
Subdivision Chapter and offered some additional suggestions which have been
incorporated into the draft now presented to the Council for consideration and first
reading. In particular, the language relating to phasing of street improvements was
clarified to reflect current practices and the nearly built out nature of the community.
Chapter 156, with the proposed revisions, is included in the Council packet beginning on
page 64.
COUNCIL ACTION: Grant first reading of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 156 of the City
Code, as Recommended by the Plan Commission and incorporating modifications as
suggested Alderman Adelman.
8. NEW BUSINESS
9. ADDITIONAL ITEMS FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION
10. ADJOURNMENT
Office of the City Manager October 12, 2016
The City of Lake Forest is subject to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities
Act of 1990. Individuals with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who require
certain accommodations in order to allow them to observe and/or participate in this
meeting, or who have questions regarding the accessibility of the meeting or the
facilities, are required to contact City Manager Robert R. Kiely, Jr., at (847) 234-2600
promptly to allow the City to make reasonable accommodations for those persons.
12
13
ANNUAL TREASUER’S REPORT
THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST
FISCAL YEAR ENDING APRIL 30, 2016
COMPENSATION SUMMARY:
Under $25,000
DALE ABBINANTI,GAVIN ADAMS,JOYCE ALLEN,SARAH ALLEN,JESSICA ANDERSEN,SHELLEY AQUINO,RICHARD ASHWORTH,MILANA
ASTORINO,KAREN AVERY,ALEXANDRA AVIANO,FRANCISCO AYALA RODRIGUEZ,MAXWELL BALLO,ANA BARTOSZEWSKI,LAURA
BARTUSIAK,WILLIAM BAUDER,JOSEPH BEIBLE,RYAN BENDER,NICOLE BESHILAS,JESSICA BESS,MARY BIRES,KATHERINE BLACK,JACK
BLAKE,ANNE BOLOTIN,JOANN BOYLE,BARRY BRAVO,LINDA BRODERICK,ZACHERY BULICH,MARGARET BURDA,CASSANDRA BURKE,AIDAN
BYBEE,AMANDA BYRNE,JOSE CALDERON,SERENA CARBONELL,OFELIA CARMICHAEL,KEVIN CARR,ULISES CASTRO,ERICK CERNA
GUZMAN,JUSTIN CHAMBLISS,MARITZA CHAVEZ,LESLIE CHERWNEKA,CHRISTOPHER CHOUINARD,FABIAN CHRISTOR,JULIANNE
CHRISTOU,STEPHEN CIRAME,RYNE CLEMENT,MARY CLEVELAND,JAMES COMBS,EMILY CONDIC,JONATHON CONNOR,WILLIAM
CONOVER,RYAN CONSTANTINO,JUAN CONTRERAS,DAVID COSBY,KALI COTTELEER,KORI COTTELEER,ASHLEY COUSSENS,PETER
CRAWFORD,CATHERINE CROFTON,CAROLINE CRONIN,CHARLES CRONIN,HILARY CURTIS,WILLIAM CURTISS,NICHOLAS CVIJOVIC,PAUL
DAIZOVI,AARON DALZOT,MITCHELL DEBIASE,CATHERINE DEMET,CHRISTOPHER DEMET,NICHOLAS DEMET,JENNA DETHLEFSEN,JANELLE
DEWITT,CHARLES DEYOUNG,MARY DEYOUNG,ERIN DOHERTY,LAUREN DUNKLEMAN,DONNA DUNN,JAKE DURBURG,PETER
DUROT,JOHN ECKERT,PARKER EDWARDS,JAMES EGAN,KRISTIN ELLIOTT,SOFIA ESPINO,HEATHER FAUDEL,PATRICK FELDE,AMANDA
FERNANDEZ,MACKENZIE FIORE,AMBER FITZGERALD,KATHERINE FLURI,THOMAS FLYNN,SAMANTHA FRIEDLUND,DANIEL
FUNCHESS,DONALD FURTH,GRANT FURTON,REID FURTON,NICHOLAS GALASSO,JOHN GARD,DEBORAH GARREY,HERBERT
GARREY,THOMAS GAYE,MEGHAN GAYTER,JOAN GIANGIORGI,ROSEANN GIANGIORGI,PETER GIERE,CONNOR GLYNN,STEPHANIE
GOEBEL,ARTURO GONZALEZ,BRITTANY GOODRICH,ELMER GOTTSCHALK JR,MARY KATE GRAZIANO,DENITA GREGORY,ROYCE
GREGORY,MATTHEW GRUENES,JOE GUALANDRI,SHERLY GUEST,HEATHER GUNN,ALANA HALSNE-BAARDA,ARGY MAITA
HAMBURG,FREDERICK HAMBURG,ELIZABETH HAMILTON,DANIEL HANSON,BRIDGET HARDY,SAMUEL HARLOCKER,CATHERINE
HARRINGTON,SHARON HARTSHORNE,MATTHEW HAVLIK,BRENDA HELLWIG,AMY HEPBURN,HECTOR HERRERA-MALDONAD,BRIAN
HILL,MATTHEW HILL,ASHLEY HITCHCOCK,ALEC HITE,NICOLE HOSKINS,LINDSAY HOUGH,WILLIAM HOWARD,BRANDON
HRDLICKA,DANIEL HUGHES,JOSHUA HUGHES,NICHOLAS HUMPHREY,WILLIAM HUMPHREY,ANDREW HUNT,ALEXANDER JACKSON,LISA
JACOBS,KATELIN JENKO,NATHANIEL JERMAIN,CASEY JEWETT,ALASTAIR JOHNSON,ROBERT JOHNSON,WILLIAM JOHNSON,JONATHON
JOYCE,JENNA JOZEFOWSKI,LORI JULIAN,JAIME JURADO,KENDALL KAMHOLZ,KATELYN KASHUL,KRISTEN KAVANAGH,COURTNEY
KEHRMANN,DAVIS KHALILI,THOMAS KIENZLE,JANET KILKELLY,TREVOR KINGSLEY,SAMANTHA KISS,DANIEL KITCHEL,BRIANA
KLAUS,RUSSELL KLUCHKA,WILLIAM KNESLEY,DANIELLE KNIGHTON,ARETA KOHOUT,KEVIN KONSLER,STEPHEN KONSLER,BRANT
KOTOWSKI,MICHAEL KRAPF,MONICA KRZEMINSKI,JEANETTE KUHNS,MARY JO KUTYNA,NICHOLAS LAMBERT,JOHN LANDIS,CAITLIN
LANIGAN,REILLY LANIGAN,MIGUEL LARA,KYLE LEMMER,DENNIS LINEHAN,JAMES LOCKEFEER,EUGENE LONERGAN,JOSE LOPEZ,JEREMY
LUEBKE,KATELYN LUTTERBACH,LEANN LYDEN,JULIA MADDEN,HEATHER MADER,THERESE MADIGAN,DANIEL MADURA,ETHAN
MADURA,JACQUELINE MADURA,SUSAN MANDELTORT,BRITTNEY MANNING,THOMAS MARKS,ANDREW MARTINI,MARGARET
MASS,WILLIAM MATCHETT,JAKE MATTSON,ANNE MCARDLE,CATHLEEN MCCORMICK,AMANDA MCDONALD,JOSEPH
MCGRAIN,MATTHEW MCKIERNAN,MARIAN MCNAIR,RICHARD MELLADO,SAMANTHA MILECKI,CAL MILLER,TAYLOR MITCHELL,MAX
MOORE,SHANNON MORELOCK,JOSE MORENO,DAWN MORRIS,LISA MOULTON,BAILEY MULLER,CHRISTOPHER MURPHY,SHANNON
MURRAY,MARGARET MURRENS,CAROL MYERS,THOMAS MYERS,JOHN NELSON,MADELEINE NELSON,FACUNDO OCAMPO,ALEXANDER
O'GRADY,JASON OLSON,KYLE O'MALLEY,COLMAN O'RIORDAN,DANIELLE ORSINI,LISA ORSINI,JASON OSTROWSKI,KATHERINE
O'TRUK,LISA PADDOR,MILES PADZENSKY,KELLY PAGE,BRIAN PANNIER,ZOE PANOS,RILEY PARROTT,ALEXIS PAULSEN,HENRY
PEARSON,HEATHER PECHTL,ADRIAN PEOPLES,MICHAEL PERRY,RALPH PETERSON,BENNETT PETRAY,LAUREN PETROSKY,EMMA
PIRE,ROBERT PLUTA,MATTHEW POGACHNIK,SCOTT POWELL,JANICE PRICE,SAMANTHA PRUSAC,DEBORAH PTAK,CRISTIAN
QUINONES,DIEGO QUINONES,MICHAEL RAFFERTY,SANDRA RAGSDALE,JESUS RAMIREZ,DAVID RANSDELL,THOMAS RANSOM,STEPHANIE
RAUPP,GENE RAUSCH,JULIE REIDEL,SANDRA RHODES,JOSEPH RISI,RAUL RODRIGUEZ,ROBERTO RODRIGUEZ,ADRIAN ROMAN
GONZALEZ,AMY ROSE,CLAIRE RUGGLES,OLIVIA RUGGLES,SHIVANI SAIGAL,JULIE SAKICI,JAMES SAUSER,REBECCA SAUSER,IAN
SCHAPPE,JOHN SCHMIDT,CLAIRE SCHNEIDER,JONATHAN SCHOENHEIDER,JANE SCHUMACHER,WILLIAM SCROGGINS,JOHN
SENTELL,RYAN SERKOWSKI,CHRISTOPHER SHANNON,ANDREW SHAW,ANN SHAW,MICHAEL SHIELDS,JANET SICKLES,CONNOR
SIMMS,OLIVEA SIMMS,SUSAN SIMMS,MICHAEL SIMPSON,MICHAEL SINCLAIR,KELLY SINDT,KRISTEN SKISTON,FREDERICK
SMITH,KATHLEEN SMITH,JULIA SOBOLEWSKI,TAYLOR SOLUM,CORY SPANN,AMY SPECTOR,SAMANTHA SRICHARMORN,BRANDON
STANONIK,HENRY STECK,AMI STELLATOS,KIMBERLY STIBAL,DEENA STOVALL,MEGAN STUMPF,ANDREW SUCHOWSKI,SUSAN
SUHLING,MARY TARPLEY,RALPH TAYLOR,ROBERT TAYLOR,JAMES THIEL,ERIC THOMPSON,DEBORAH TIBBLES,EILEEN TIMKEN,NICOLE
TORSKIY,JOHN TRAYNOR,LESLIE TREECE,THOMAS TRKLA,ALEXANDRA TRUTTER,ALYSSA TUNISON,MARK TURELLI,EDWARD
TUTEN,MARGUERITE TUTEN,KAYLA UHWAT-VICICONDI,TRACY ULMER,HILLIARY VACCARELLO,NICHOLAS VAN ANTWERP,GLORIA
VARGAS-MUNOZ,AMBER VICE,LIELAH VICTOR,RICHARD VILLASANA,MARISSA WADHWA,ALLEN WALKER,JOHN WALKER,STEVEN
WERCHEK,KATHRYN WHALLEY,KRISTY WHITE,WILLIAM WHITE,BRIDGET WHITED,SARAH WHITNEY,CLAIRE WILLIAMS,JACK
WILLIAMS,JOSEPH WILLIAMS,BRICE WITEK,JEREMY WOERTZ,DEBRA WOOD,IONA WOODS,GRACE WU,KIMBERLY YESSIAN
$25,000 to $49,999.99
EDMUNDO ALVAREZ,JOYCE BETTINGER,MARILYNN BRUNS,PATRICIO CAMARENA,AMBER CAMPBELL,MATTHEW CHOUINARD,DEBORAH
CHROBAK,WILLIAM CLIFFORD,ARTURO ESCOBAR,CHRISTINE FAUDEL,MARIANO GOMEZ,JAMES GUNN,ESTHER GUTIERREZ-
14
SLOAN,ELIZABETH HOPE,NICKOLAS HUBEEK,ERIC KRUEGER,MARK KRYGERIS,DEBRA LERMAN,DIANA MILLER,CHRISTOPHER
POMMER,TARA PURTELL,JAMES RISI,DANIELLE SPANN
$50,000 to $74,999.99
MARGARET BOYER,ROBERT BROWN,CAROLYNN CALLABY,ANTHONY CARABALLO,DAVID CERER,MORGAN COLLINS,RIGOBERTO
CORIA,JOSE DIAZ,JOHN ELDRIDGE,MICHELLE FRIEDRICH,PABLO GARCIA,VALERIE GONZALEZ,MICHAEL GOY,PHILIP GUALDONI,LARONDA
HAINES,SARA HARTNETT,STEVEN HILL,ERIK HUSTON,CATHERINE JAPUNTICH,PATRICIA JENKINS,MICHELLE KOUSINS,TERESA
LAURILA,JESSICA LINDERS,BARBARA LUEDER-MANETTI,SALOMON MARTINEZ JR.,KIMBERLY MCCANN,KATHERINE MCMANUS,THOMAS
MINARIK,JASON MITCHELL,KASEY MORGAN,MADELINE PALENICA,RICKEY PARHAM,KENNETH PIERINI,BECKY POCASANGRE,ISMAEL
RAMIREZ,LAUREN REAUMOND,TROY REEVES,TERRY RICHARDS,PENNY ROBBINS,MITCHELL ROGALSKI,LISSARDA ROGOZ,WILLIAM
SCHELHAS,PATRICIA SCHWALL,JAMES SHELTON IV,MICHAEL STRONG,NADA SYDOW,ANGELA TAPPA,CARLA WARD,WILLIAM
WRIGHT,MARK ZALKE
$75,000 to $99.999.99
CRISPIN ABEL,BRIAN ACELLO,ANTHONY ANASZEWICZ,DAVID ANDERSEN,JOHN BALDWIN,SUSAN BANKS,JAN-PIERRE BARDI,DOMINICK
BELLINO,ERIK BLOMBERG,RICHARD BRIJA,MATT BRUGIONI,JASON BUSDEKER,MIGUEL CAMARENA,TONY CARINGELLO,ROBERT
CARMICHAEL,STUART COX,RAFAEL DAVILA,BRYAN DEBAETS,CHARLES DOUGLAS,DANIEL DRAEGER,BRIAN D'SOUZA,CRYSTAL
EDWARDS,BRIAN ESMON,CHARLES FRANCO,CHRISTOPHER FREUND,YONI GARCIA,MIKE GERNENZ,MICHAEL GLOMSKI,MATTHEW
GOODMAN,PETER GORDON,RONALD GRAMER,KENNETH HAGLUND,FRIEDRICH HOEFT,BILL HOOPER,DIANE HORN,JOSHUA
HUCKER,BRIAN HUFFHINES,SCOTT IRISH,KEVIN ISSEL,PATRICK ISSEL,MATTHEW JAKOB,ROBERT JANUARY,EDWARD JOHNSON,BRIAN
JOYCE,LAWRENCE KENAR,MATTHEW KLUCHKA,JAMES KOBLAS,CHARLES KRIENS,AARON KRUCHKO,DANIEL LAINIO,BILLY LOYD,TIMOTHY
MAGOON,MISAKO MAJ,KEITH MASLON,BRIAN MIKLOVIC,DAVID MINISCALCO,MICHAEL MOUNTS,TODD NAHIGIAN,TRAVIS
PEDERSEN,PAUL PETERSEN,BRIAN POGACHNIK,BERNARD PONDEXTER,MATTHEW RAUSCH,ANDREW RICK,CHRISTOPHER
ROBERTS,MARK ROCKWELL,KYLE ROEDER,JAMES SANTOSTEFANO,ROBERT SERKOWSKI,DENNIS SMITH,RAYMOND SPETZ,COLLEEN
SYC,CHRISTINE TERESI,MICHAEL TIEGS,JOSEPH TOMASELLO,JOHN VARNER,RICHARD VOLPE,KENNETH WAGNER,MATTHEW
WERT,MICHAEL WHALEN,COREY WIEREMA,JEFFREY WIEREMA,ROBERT WOLFF,JOANNE YORRO
$100,000 to $124,999.99
PHILLIP ALDERKS,ANDREW ALLAN,RICK ANDERSON,ANDREW BARNES,MARTIN BLITSTEIN,WILLIAM BORZICK,SCOTT
CHRISTENSEN,ROBERT COPELAND,KEVIN CRONIN,DWIGHT DAVIS,DAVID DEMARCO,TROY DEVRIES,WENDY DUMONT,ROBERT ELLS,ERIC
FARR,CHARLES FLESCH,JOSEPH GABANSKI,MICHAEL GALLO,CHRISTOPHER GARRISON,TIMOTHY GEHRING,ERIC GLOBERGER,STEPHEN
GROST,BENJAMIN GRUM,JOHN GULLEDGE,DIANE HALL,ROBERT HEELAN JR,STEVEN HUCK,MICHAEL HUGHES,CORY KAZIMOUR,ERIK
KOSITZKI,MICHAEL LANGE,CRAIG LEPKOWSKI,MARK LONG,BRETT MARQUETTE,DANIEL MARTIN,ROBERT MARTINELLI,ADAM
MILCZAREK,JOSEPH MOBILE,ROBERT MONAHAN,CHARLES MYERS,RICHARD PAULSEN,MATTHEW PENAR,ERIC PODOWSKI,PAUL
PUGLIESE,NICHOLAS SAVEL,MARK SENGER,ANDY SHIU,PETER SIEBERT,MATTHEW SIGNA,JOSEPH STANONIK,JEFFREY SULKIN,DAVID
TISINAI,EDMUND YEP,KEVIN ZELK
$125,000 and over
CATHERINE CZERNIAK,JAMES FAHEY,JAMES HELD,ELIZABETH HOLLEB,JEFFREY HOWELL,DESHA KALMAR,ROBERT KIELY,SALLY
SWARTHOUT,MICHAEL THOMAS,KARL WALLDORF
Total Compensation $21,003,906.71
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY:
1ST AYD CHEMICAL CORPORATION 9,966.30,3M LAR5393 6,166.00,A & A SPRINKLER COMPANY INC 11,864.00,A HORN INC 21,956.00,A
LAMP CONCRETE CONTRACTORS, INC 191,941.03,ABC WINDOW CLEANING COMPANY, INC 3,680.00,ABT ELECTRONICS & APPLIANCES
CO 4,546.86,ACCURATE TANK CONSTRUCTION 22,668.16,ACOM SOLUTIONS INC 4,333.60,ADS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
18,342.00,ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF IL 203,339.75,AGSCO CORPORATION 9,950.08,AIR CON REFRIGERATION & HEATING
100,430.00,AIR ONE EQUIPMENT INC 11,909.20,AIR SERVICES COMPANY 6,700.99,AL WARREN OIL COMPANY, INC. 34,468.37,ALARM
SECURITY INC 3,190.00,ALBERTSON'S INC. 16,721.20,ALEXANDER CHEMICAL CORPORATION 18,755.88,ALFRED BENESCH & COMPANY
21,245.91,ALL AMERICAN UNIFORMS & SUPPLY 3,251.30,ALPHA PAINTWORKS INC 7,500.00,AMERICAN BACKFLOW PREVENTION INC
5,911.00,AMERICAN DEMOLITION CORP 1,487,278.88,AMERICAN GAS LAMP WORKS, LLC 7,497.71,AMERICAN GASES CORP
6,538.69,AMERICAN LEGAL PUBLISHING CORP 2,803.55,AMERICAN OUTFITTERS LTD 24,334.24,AMERICAN WATER WORKS
ASSOCIATION 2,693.00,AMERICA'S ACTION TERRITORY 3,292.23,ANDRES MEDICAL BILLING LTD 26,437.06,AOK GOURMET LLC
10,894.00,APEX COMPANIES, LLC 98,974.46,APPAREL SEWN RIGHT 10,237.29,APPLIED CONCEPTS, INC. 8,168.00,APPLIED ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES ING 5,000.00,ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SERVICES 4,249.43,ARTHUR CLESEN INC 8,270.00,ARTHUR WEILER INC
5,657.00,ARTRAGEOUS CUSTOM ENGRAVING, LLC 3,916.10,ASH PRODUCTIONS, LLC 3,840.00,ASPEN VALLEY LANDSCAPE SUPPLY
6,527.22,ASSOCIATED ADVERTISERS INC 3,010.00,AT & T 117,413.06,ATLAS BOBCAT INC 15,243.53,AURICO REPORTS, INC
4,297.95,AVALON PETROLEUM COMPANY 22,487.52,AVI SYSTEMS, INC. 10,750.00,AYRES ASSOCIATES, INC. 42,882.00,BAKER TILLY
VIRCHOW KRAUSE LLP 14,700.00,BARRIOS CUSTODIAL SERVICES, INC 12,832.00,BAXTER AND WOODMAN INC 44,955.99,BEBER CAMP
15,712.00,BELL'S ULTIMATE TRUCK OUTFITTERS 4,138.00,BENJAMIN HISTORIC CERTIFICATION 16,537.55,BENN, EDWIN H.
3,150.00,BERKEN-KOTTER, LTD. 5,725.11,BERRY TIRE CO 8,527.42,BIG TOP TENT AND PARTY RENTALS 3,000.00,BILTMORE
REFRIGERATION SERVICE 6,354.90,BLACKMON ENTERPRISES 9,742.21,BLAUER TACTICAL SYSTEMS INC 3,649.00,BLECK ENGINEERING
CO INC 35,992.20,BOB FISH BUICK GMC, INC 114,338.00,BOBBY DOUGLASS PRO CAMPS 3,352.80,BOUMA, JAMES AND DONNA
3,076.13,BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC 6,836.24,BRISTOL HOSE&FITTING DIVISION 2,618.81,BRP US INC 4,764.12,BRUCE R. TALBOT
ASSOCIATES INC 6,321.24,BSA TROOP 48 7,824.81,BSN SPORTS 4,059.74,BUILDING PERMIT REFUNDS 392,669.74,BURRIS EQUIPMENT
COMPANY 286,212.93,BUSHNELL, INCORPORATED 7,237.95,BUZB CORPORATION 2,700.00,CALL ONE 62,195.68,CAMPBELL, AMBER
3,099.88,CAREY'S HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING 2,658.00,CARMICHAEL ROBERT L 2,503.23,CARTS ON 12 INC. 3,520.00,CATHY ROE
PRODUCTIONS 8,110.00,CDS OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 9,733.00,CDW 112,240.94,CEMETERY LOT REFUNDS 25,510.00,CENTRAL
MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY 2,945.00,CENTRAL SUBURBAN YOUTH FOOTBALL 4,750.00,CENTURY SUPPLY COMPANY 14,030.29,CERAMIC
15
SUPPLY CHICAGO INC 9,629.71,CERTIFIED POWER, INC. 4,022.18,CFA SOFTWARE, INC. 3,745.00,CHAPMAN AND CUTLER LLP
18,000.00,CHARLES J FIORE COMPANY INC 13,866.38,CHICAGO COMMUNICATIONS LLC 3,700.60,CHICAGO NATL ASSOC OF DANCE
MASTERS 5,395.00,CHICAGO PROFESSIONAL SPORTS LIMITED 16,003.00,CHICAGO STUCCO CO., INC. 3,960.00,CHICAGO TRIBUNE
17,120.21,CHRZANOWSKI, FRANK 23,764.00,CINTAS CORPORATION 15,856.66,CIT GROUP, INC 6,631.40,CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK
14,316.74,CLARK BAIRD SMITH, LLP 52,653.75,CLARK, JULIE K 7,775.00,CLARKE AQUATIC SERVICES, INC 4,321.00,CLASSIC GARDEN
ORNAMENTS, LTD 4,703.00,CLEAN CUT TREE SERVICE, INC 9,241.00,CLIENTFIRST CONSULTING GROUP 59,803.04,CLUB MOMENTUM
ATHLETICS 2,725.02,COE EQUIPMENT, INC 3,051.56,COLLEGE OF DUPAGE 2,536.00,COLLEGE OF LAKE COUNTY 10,075.00,COLLEGE
PARK ATHLETIC CLUB 20,732.80,COLLINS, MORGAN J 5,681.45,COLUMBIA PIPE AND SUPPLY COMPANY 8,284.21,COLUMBUS
MCKINNON CORP 9,707.05,COMCAST OF CHICAGO, INC. 29,659.55,COMED 57,786.60,COMMUNICATION REVOLVING FUND
6,988.80,COMMUNICATIONS FINANCE, INC. 8,023.00,COMMUNITY PARTNERS AFFORD HOUSING 100,000.00,COMPASS MINERALS
AMERICA INC 108,152.72,COMPUTER EXPLORERS 7,410.00,CONCARE INC 37,346.97,CONDELL MEDICAL CENTER 4,800.00,CONSERV FS
71,314.51,CONSERVATION DESIGN FORUM 18,900.85,CONSTELLATION ENERGY SERVICES, INC 78,238.13,CONSTELLATION ENERGY
SERVICES, INC 303,303.28,CONSTRUCTION CONSULTING & DISBURSEMENT 37,263.23,CONTINENTAL CLAY COMPANY
3,029.94,CONTINENTAL WEATHER SERVICE 3,600.00,CONWAY PARK AT LAKE FOREST 4,852.87,CORE VISION IT SOLUTIONS LLC
8,562.06,CORUS GROUP LLC 13,203.26,COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION 11,653.47,CRAFTWOOD LUMBER COMPANY
2,814.20,CRAIG BERGMANN LANDSCAPE DESIGN 17,542.50,CREATIVE CONCRETE 27,364.50,CREDENTIALS INC 86,125.81,CREDENTIALS
ORDER PROCESSING SERVICES 12,676.35,CRIBB FINE FOOD 2,907.57,CROWDER SUPPLY COMPANY INC 3,563.86,CRYOTECH DEICING
TECHNOLOGY 2,812.60,CRYSTAL MAINTENANCE SERVICES 157,197.60,CUMMINS NPOWER LLC 29,755.72,CURRIE MOTORS
FRANKFORT, INC 119,869.00,CURTAIN CALL COSTUMES 9,858.78,CZERNIAK, CATHERINE 3,384.47,D. K. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,
5,500.00,DAIOHS USA 11,740.13,DAVID L.F. WILSON & COMPANY INC 12,345.00,DCG ROOFING SOLUTIONS INC 602,809.00,DE MARCO,
DAVID 6,308.15,DEMING DESIGNS INC. 3,425.00,DEMUTH INC 58,146.67,DI MEO BROS INC 13,400.00,DI TOMASSO EXCAVATING
27,495.00,DIRECT FITNESS SOLUTIONS, LLC 17,224.12,DISCOUNT MEDIA PRODUCTS, LLC 2,824.41,DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY
4,766.77,DIVINCI PAINTERS INC 107,164.00,DIVISION OF VITAL RECORDS 14,396.00,DJ PRODUCTS INC 7,845.31,DK ORGANICS LLC
4,543.72,D'LAND CONSTRUCTION, LLC 59,709.80,DOETSCH CONTRACTORS INC 3,325.00,DONATI'S OF LAKE FOREST
7,417.07,DYNACOIL, INC 3,319.00,EJ EQUIPMENT INC. 7,700.00,ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 175,233.80,ELAWA FARM FOUNDATION
31,469.75,ELEVATOR INSPECTION SERVICE COMPANY 9,448.00,ELITE GROWERS 8,916.00,ENGEL, BRENT 18,000.00,ENTERPRISE RENT-
A-CAR 4,117.97,EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY 3,681.55,ERNIE'S WRECKER SERVICE 2,825.00,ESRI 9,700.00,E-Z-GO TEXTRON
INC. 8,179.00,FAMILY SERVICE OF LAKE COUNTY 6,641.25,FEDERAL RENT A FENCE, INC. 28,564.05,FERENTINO'S PIZZA
8,953.28,FILIPPINI LAW FIRM LLP 415,017.65,FILTRATION CONCEPTS, INC. 4,954.97,FIRE PENSION PAYMENTS 2,027,466.60,FIRST
NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA 13,258.98,FIRST POINT MECHANICAL SERVICE 48,416.09,FIRST STUDENT INC 3,515.25,FLEET
TRANSMISSION SERVICE LLC 4,076.95,FLEET US, LLC 3,506.86,FLETCHER, SYDNEY 2,695.00,FLIPS GYMNASTICS NORTH SHORE
20,996.00,FLOLO CORPORATION 72,416.02,FOCUS ACQUISITION COMPANY LLC 4,550.00,FOSTER COACH SALES, INC.
80,697.49,FRIENDS OF LAKE FOREST PARKS & RECREATION 32,806.75,FRONTIER LANDSCAPE INC 2,716.00,FUTURE INDUSTRIAL
TECHNOLOGIES 8,100.85,G & O THERMAL SUPPLY CO. 5,099.17,GALLO, MIKE 4,841.70,GAS DEPOT INC 211,681.46,GATE OPTIONS
3,254.10,GATOR CHEF INC 17,716.97,GATWOOD CRANE SERVICE INC 4,820.00,GEMPLER'S, INC. 7,416.04,GENERAL PARTS, INC
28,372.98,GETZ'S INCORPORATED 8,305.44,GEWALT-HAMILTON ASSOC INC 234,223.93,GIS CONSORTIUM 3,277.99,GLACIER OAKS
NURSERY INC 4,766.85,GLOBAL EMERGENCY PRODUCTS INC 8,134.06,GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK INC 6,275.25,GONZALEZ,
VALERIE 4,369.40,GOODMAN ELECTRIC SUPPLY 27,650.85,GORTON COMMUNITY CENTER 2,935.00,GOSEWISCH, PATRICK E.
12,552.28,GRABER MANUFACTURING, INC. 8,332.56,GRAFFITI GRILL INCORPORATED 3,515.00,GRAINGER 59,148.70,GRANT WRITING
CONSULTANTS LLC 28,000.00,GRAPHIC PARTNERS, INC. 3,600.00,GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 6,869.31,GREENS BY WHITE INC
4,068.80,GREG'S AUTO BODY, INC. 20,251.08,GRO HORTICULTURAL ENTERPRISES 10,410.00,GROWER EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY
4,548.71,GRUM, BENJAMIN 2,622.14,GUY SCOPELLITI CO., INC. 37,886.20,H T STRENGER INC 4,398.00,H W LOCHNER, INC.
16,750.06,HAAPANEN BROTHERS, INC. 12,313.32,HABITAT SYSTEMS LTD 4,995.00,HACH COMPANY 6,739.25,HADDAD LAW FIRM LLC
9,354.50,HALLORAN & YAUCH INC. 8,294.89,HANSON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INC 11,895.00,HAVEY COMMUNICATIONS INC
60,695.90,HBK WATER METER SERVICE INC 13,523.63,HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD. 103,831.82,HEALTH ENDEAVORS, S. C.
20,266.00,HEARTLAND BUSINESS SYSTEMS, LL 165,126.69,HELLER CATERING 9,196.40,HENDERSON, JANET AUSTIN 4,559.95,HERKY'S
TRUCKING INC 19,125.00,HOBBY LOBBY CREATIVE CENTERS 3,286.62,HOERR CONSTRUCTION, INC 173,531.36,HOLLAND SUPPLY INC
4,897.20,HOME DEPOT 45,207.15,HOVING PIT STOP, INC. 6,552.82,HOWARD, WILLIAM R. 3,761.97,HOWE SECURITY, INC
6,424.00,HUBEEK, NICKOLAS 3,892.65,I.R.M.A. 214,629.34,I/O SOLUTIONS, INC 4,025.00,ICMA 4,267.04,IDLEWOOD ELECTRIC SUPPLY
16,371.59,ILL DEPT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY 103,064.75,ILL DEPT OF REVENUE 21,053.06,ILL DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
172,653.68,ILL MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 1,444,169.68,ILLCO, INC. 2,989.00,ILLINOIS DEPT OF TRANSPORATION
26,561.70,ILLINOIS FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION 3,018.62,ILLINOIS FIRE STORE 3,876.71,ILLINOIS GIRLS LACROSSE ASSOC
4,942.50,ILLINOIS PUMP INC 39,285.64,ILLINOIS ROOF CONSULTING ASSOC 8,840.00,ILLINOIS STATE TREASURER'S OFFICE
7,611.97,ILLINOIS TRUCK CENTRE, INC 3,520.82,IMAGES ALIVE 3,789.76,INNER SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC. 11,721.45,INTEGRATED LAKES
MANAGEMENT, INC 5,452.45,INTERDEV, LLC 104,300.76,INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 1,096,867.42,INTERNATIONAL SECURITY
PRODUCT 3,011.73,INTERSTATE BATTERY OF NORTHERN 7,408.33,INTERSTATE POWER SYSTEMS, INC. 6,522.45,INTL
CEMETERY/CREMATN/FUNERAL 2,752.50,J W TURF 43,901.55,JACOB & HEFNER ASSOCIATES, INC 221,804.96,JAMES LA DUKE AND
ASSOCIATES 11,497.00,JAMES W SMITH PRINTING COMPANY 6,477.00,JETS ELECTRICAL TESTING & FIELD 8,118.00,JG UNIFORMS, INC.
21,069.09,JMR LANDSCAPING LLC 3,245.73,JOHN S. SWIFT COMPANY, INC 24,461.00,JS COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES
8,174.66,JULIE INC 4,074.22,K & M MARKETING INC 13,943.10,K. H. KIM'S TAE KWON DO 7,800.00,KAPLAN PAVING, LLC
17,408.36,KEMPER SPORTS MANAGEMENT, INC. 103,206.88,KENOSHA NEWS 7,988.83,KIDDLES INC 12,575.95,KINNUCAN
225,260.00,KIRBY PEST CONTROL 2,885.00,KNOX CO. 10,300.00,KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTION 37,929.77,KONICA MINOLTA
BUSINESS SOLUTI 9,156.36,KONSLER, KEVIN W. 7,500.00,KOWALSKI MEMORIALS INC 3,075.00,LA FORCE 5,056.00,LAKE BLUFF
BASEBALL ASSOCIATION 6,840.00,LAKE COUNTY COLLECTOR 39,281.81,LAKE COUNTY HOSE AND EQUIPMENT 5,741.58,LAKE COUNTY
PIPE & SUPPLY CO 3,375.86,LAKE COUNTY PRESS, INC 31,775.35,LAKE FOREST BANK AND TRUST 234,515.82,LAKE FOREST BP
16
7,121.67,LAKE FOREST CLUB 5,799.99,LAKE FOREST COLLEGE 1,131,645.00,LAKE FOREST COMM HIGH SCH 115 9,410.43,LAKE FOREST
FLOWERS 2,594.79,LAKE FOREST LACROSSE ASSOCIATION 18,562.50,LAKE FOREST LANDMARK DEVELOPMENT 6,225.00,LAKE FOREST
SCHOOL OF MANGEMNT 9,153.58,LAKE FOREST SWIM CLUB 3,644.80,LAKE STATES EVERGREEN COMPANY 2,691.66,LAKELAND HVAC
AUTOMATION INC 41,283.16,LANDSCAPE CONCEPTS MANAGEMENT 69,034.00,LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES, INC. 186,481.00,LANGUAGE
STARS 2,756.25,LARSEN FLORIST / GREENHOUSE 5,384.50,LAUTERBACH & AMEN LLP 3,200.00,LAW OFFICE OF HENRY TONIGAN, RET PC
8,250.00,LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. 13,969.52,LEACH ENTERPRISES INC 7,734.87,LEADS ONLINE LLC 2,848.00,LENCO FLOORING
6,180.00,LEXIPOL, LLC 5,550.00,LF PROF FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 189 27,970.00,LF/LB CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 2,718.00,LIBERTY PRAIRIE
RESTORATIONS 9,500.22,LIFE INSURANCE CO OF NORTH AMERICA 42,863.75,LINDCO EQUIPMENT SALES, INC. 20,404.56,LOHMAN
GOLF DESIGNS 18,540.00,LOWE'S CREDIT SERVICES 4,221.34,LTD TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC 6,831.52,LUCAS LANDSCAPING AND
DESIGN 7,937.50,LUCAS, KIMBERLY K. 2,710.00,LYONS ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 12,232.05,M & M GOLF CARS LLC 29,618.00,M.
TANZILLO, INC. 7,990.00,M.A.S.A. 2,885.95,MABAS DIVISION 4 5,850.00,MAG CONSTRUCTION CO 512,571.38,MAJESTIC OAKS NURSERY
LLC 10,631.00,MANFREDINI LANDSCAPING CO., INC 46,353.00,MARIANI LANDSCAPE 28,035.92,MARIANI PLANTS 13,293.10,MARTELLE
WATER TREATMENT, INC. 7,610.00,MARTIN PETERSEN CO INC 73,488.47,MARTINELLI CORP 3,664.00,MARVIN FEIG & ASSOCIATES LTD
7,843.00,MASS MEDICAL S.C. 21,385.00,MCHENRY ANALYTICAL WATER 8,155.00,MCHENRY COUNTY NURSERY INC
4,960.00,MCMASTER CARR 11,416.17,MCNEILUS TRUCK & MFG CO 170,089.65,MEDICAL AND DENTAL CLAIMS 4,810,753.48,MENONI &
MOCOGNI INC 24,826.77,MID AMERICAN WATER OF WAUCONDA 11,142.76,MIDWEST COMPUTER RECYCLING, IN 4,525.67,MIDWEST
ENVIRONMENT CONSULT SERVICE 22,055.00,MIDWEST GROUNDCOVERS 8,043.33,MIDWEST LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE
9,900.00,MIDWEST LUBE INC 4,905.30,MIDWEST TRADING HORTICULTURE SUPPLY 29,467.66,MILL CREEK NURSERY INC 3,150.00,MISC
ONE TIME VENDOR 13,718.59,MNJ TECHNOLOGIES DIRECT, INC. 34,628.10,MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE 13,000.00,MORRISON
ASSOCIATES LTD 8,200.00,MORTENSON ROOFING COMPANY INC 20,594.00,MORTON GROVE AUTO 6,860.63,MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS,
INC. 4,651.63,MPC COMMUNICATIONS & LIGHTING 2,553.70,MUNICIPAL GIS PARTNERS, INC. 188,795.40,MUNICIPAL SYSTEMS, INC.
23,430.50,MURPHY, IRENE Z. 2,644.00,MUTUAL SERVICES OF HIGHLAND PARK 10,211.15,NATIVE RESTORATION SERVICES, INC
8,000.00,NEENAH FOUNDRY 7,465.92,NEOGOV 9,830.00,NEOPOST USA, INC 5,629.36,NEPTUN LIGHT, INC 73,289.00,NEW WORLD
SOLUTIONS, INC 4,800.00,NIPSTA 5,410.00,NORATEK SOLUTIONS 2,850.00,NORTH EAST MULTI-REGIONAL TRAINING 8,290.00,NORTH
SHORE GAS COMPANY 29,636.16,NORTH SHORE WATER RECLAMATION 34,417.56,NORTHEASTERN IL REG CRIME LABORATORY
28,575.00,NORTHERN DIVERS USA, INC 222,897.10,NORTHERN ILL POLICE ALARM SYSTEMS 21,319.61,NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL
CONFERENCE 9,881.00,NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY 11,775.00,NORTHWIND PERENNIAL FARM, INC 4,297.65,NORTHWOODS
WREATHS CO 5,554.40,NSSRA 288,270.58,NUTOYS LEISURE PRODUCTS INC 2,863.00,NXT SPORTS, LLC 2,985.00,O C TANNER
11,640.43,OFFICEMAX, INC. 8,799.34,O'HARE DANCE STUDIOS INC 16,702.74,OLSON TRANSPORTATION, INC. 42,180.49,OM
WORKSPACE - CHICAGO 14,801.86,ON THE GREEN SOLUTIONS 26,240.00,OPENGOV, INC. 17,000.00,OPENLANDS 8,240.70,ORBIS
CORPORATION 3,936.00,ORION SAFETY PRODUCTS 2,539.67,OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY 10,039.80,OVERHEAD DOOR CO 24,205.64,P &
W GOLF SUPPLY LLC 2,978.62,P CLIFFORD MILLER INC 127,935.00,P F PETTIBONE & CO 10,576.15,P&H SENESAC, INC
33,787.80,PALMER PLUMBING & HEATING 2,899.50,PAMELA LEE STUDIOS, LLC 3,765.00,PARKMOBILE USA, INC 4,166.13,PASQUESI
HOME & GARDENS 5,702.87,PASQUESI PLUMBING CORP 17,631.50,PATTEN POWER SYSTEMS 21,830.39,PAV-TECH SEALCOATING CORP
6,832.50,PEARSON FENCE COMPANY, INC. 23,935.00,PEREZ TREE SERVICE & LANDSCAPING 37,197.50,PERSONNEL STRATEGIES LLC
7,250.00,PETER BAKER & SON 1,664,989.02,PETERSON PRODUCTS 12,093.44,PETROLIANCE LLC 29,697.05,PIEPER ELECTRIC INC
33,625.00,PILATES WITH AUDREY 4,864.00,PINNER ELECTRIC 9,752.50,PIONEER MANUFACTURING COMPANY 8,336.00,PITNEY BOWES
INC 3,120.99,PITNEY BOWES RESERVE ACCOUNT 7,600.00,PLANTE & MORAN, PLLC 7,256.25,POLICE PENSION PAYMENTS
2,438,176.40,PORTER, LINDA S. 28,227.00,POSSIBILITY PLACE NURSERY 15,630.00,POWER EQUIPMENT LEASING 10,150.00,PRECISION
SERVICE & PARTS. INC 6,079.16,PRINT TECH INC 12,667.36,PROFESSIONAL BENEFITS ADMINSTRATION 960,202.78,PROFESSIONAL
PAVING & CONCRETE 8,505.00,PROFESSIONAL POWER PRODUCTS 6,858.00,PURELY SIMPLE KITCHEN 3,688.40,R A ADAMS
ENTERPRISES INC 14,386.28,R A MANCINI, INC. 707,452.16,R J THOMAS MFG CO INC 18,019.60,R/J FURNITURE INC 5,248.00,RAINBOW
FARM ENTERPRISES, INC 8,530.00,RAMAKER & ASS0CIATES INC 2,790.00,RAY CHEVROLET INC 42,994.92,RAY O'HERRON CO INC
3,450.65,RAY SCHRAMER & CO 7,618.45,RB CONSTRUCTION 138,412.85,REALESTATE TRANSFER TAX REFUND 99,855.00,RECREATION
PROGRAM REFUNDS 38,400.05,RED WING SHOES 5,456.49,REINDERS, INC. 94,421.19,RESOURCE MANAGEMENT-CHICAGO RIDGE
63,820.88,REVOLUTION DANCEWEAR 3,770.11,REX RADIATOR 4,311.80,RIDDIFORD ROOFING COMPANY 9,893.00,RJ UNDERGROUND,
INC 701,534.18,ROCCO FIORE & SONS 20,776.40,ROCK TRED II LLC 41,846.30,RODENTPRO.COM, LLC 17,265.40,ROGAN'S SHOE
3,319.08,ROGOZ, LISSARDA 3,192.08,RON CLESEN'S ORNAMENTAL PLANTS 3,451.50,RON SARNO & ASSOCIATES 11,075.00,RONDOUT
SERVICE CENTER 6,127.50,ROSBOROUGH PARTNERS INC 6,624.35,RSM US LLP 43,500.00,RUSH TRUCK CENTERS OF ILLINOIS
41,633.23,RUSSO HARDWARE, INC. 26,634.75,RYDIN DECAL 3,916.52,S & S WORLDWIDE, INC. 3,790.70,SAE CUSTOMS INC
4,961.12,SAM'S WEST, INC. 17,584.28,SCHAEFER SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL 3,231.20,SCHOOL DISTRICT 67 15,406.61,SCHROEDER &
SCHROEDER, INC. 76,819.30,SCHWARZ, JEFF 4,958.00,SEASONS440 6,437.00,SELECTRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC 9,315.00,SEMERSKY
ENTERPRISES 16,738.53,SEMERSKY ENTERPRISES INC 4,396.10,SERVICE EXPRESS, INC. 11,885.26,S-FOUR ENTERPRISES, INC.
14,811.93,SHARP BRUSH INC 11,267.05,SHERIDAN AUTO PARTS 5,332.75,SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 49,338.36,SHOREACRES
3,150.93,SICALCO LTD 2,519.94,SILK-SCREENING BY WILL 10,637.81,SIPOS, CHRIS 3,600.00,SMITH & LALUZERNE LTD 51,538.00,SMITH
ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS 11,166.56,SOIL & MATERIAL CONSULTANTS 4,207.50,SOLARWINDS, INC 2,735.50,SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF LAKE
COUNTY 9,702.50,SONESTA COCONUT GROVE, INC. 4,045.40,SPECIALTIES DIRECT 11,767.00,SPEER FINANCIAL, INC. 32,302.46,SPIRIT OF
67 FOUNDATION 10,000.00,SPRING ALIGN OF PALATINE INC 5,368.48,STACHURA, KELLY 3,997.72,STANDARD EQUIPMENT COMPANY
17,071.95,STATE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS CORP 3,273.13,STEIN, RONALD W. 7,444.00,STEINER ELECTRIC COMPANY 14,854.25,STEPP
PARTS COMPANY 3,541.20,STERNBERG VINTAGE LIGHTING 2,551.00,STEVE OLSON PRINTING AND DESIGN 7,152.60,STONECRAFTERS
INC. 4,108.00,STRAND ASSOCIATES, INC 254,300.87,STREICHER'S POLICE EQUIPMENT 2,895.93,STRYKER SALES CORPORATION
5,796.18,SUBURBAN ACCENTS, INC. 3,125.00,SUNGARD HTE INC 67,515.22,SUNSET FOOD MART INC 10,185.42,SUPERIOR INDUSTRIAL
SUPPLY 12,336.70,SUPERIOR ROAD STRIPING INC 70,171.88,SUPREME CASTING INC 6,532.50,SUSAN L. KELSEY 56,640.80,SVANACO
17,900.00,T. Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. 80,726.60,TAPCO-TRAFFIC&PARKING CONTROL 6,634.21,TDS DOOR COMPANY
14,130.50,TEAM REIL, INC. 49,369.06,TEC ELECTRIC INC 39,756.39,TEREX UTILITIES, INC 11,717.22,TERMINAL SUPPLY COMPANY
17
5,304.34,TESKA ASSOCIATES INC 11,610.00,THE ARROW SHOP 16,475.00,THE BARR DISPLAY COMPANY LLC. 3,775.00,THE BEAN FARM
9,641.03,THE BUREAU OF NAT'L AFFAIRS INC 4,154.00,THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST 7,380.42,THE DAVEY TREE EXPERT COMPANY
18,668.00,THIRD MILLENNIUM ASSOCIATES, INC 8,262.00,THOR GUARD INC 16,325.83,THYBONY PAINT & WALLCOVERINGS
7,007.19,THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP 23,038.37,TIMOTHY W SHARPE 6,800.00,TOTAL PARKING SOLUTIONS, INC. 23,831.00,TRAC
EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC. 16,815.24,TRADITIONAL CONCRETE PRODUCTS 5,800.00,TRAFFIC CONTROL&PROTECTION INC
13,036.80,TRAFFTECH INC 6,177.50,TREDROC TIRE SERVICE 43,076.11,TREES R US, INC 19,737.92,TRITZ BEVERAGE SYSTEMS INC
4,482.81,TRUGREEN LP 17,120.05,TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 2,775.00,ULINE, INC. 9,764.88,UNITED LABORATORIES INC
4,265.87,UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 30,000.00,UNIVAR USA, INC. 3,186.60,UNIVERSAL ASBESTOS REMOVAL, INC
109,000.00,URBAN ARBORIST 7,490.00,USA BLUEBOOK 24,852.41,VANS ENTERPRISES LTD 19,915.00,VARIDESK LLC 2,800.00,VCG LTD
8,517.30,VERDER INC 16,339.27,VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SERVICE 110,151.97,VERMONT SYSTEMS, INC 56,856.02,VERNON
HILLS ANIMAL HOSPITAL 8,287.96,VILLAGE OF DEERFIELD 26,630.92,VILLAGE OF GLENVIEW 843,579.68,VILLAGE OF LAKE BLUFF
13,504.50,VISION SOLUTIONS, INC. 3,327.41,VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 40,315.76,WAKE MARINE 9,888.00,WALKER, LINDA A.
9,775.00,WALLDORF, KARL M. 2,835.46,WALNUT CREEK NURSERY 24,759.00,WAREHOUSE DIRECT 61,038.79,WATER REFUNDS
3,114.46,WAUKEGAN SAFE & LOCK LTD 4,670.21,WAUKEGAN TIRE & SUPPLY CO, INC 14,256.56,WEISSMAN'S DESIGNS FOR DANCE
7,347.19,WELDING BY K & K, LLC 6,543.49,WELLS FARGO 4,992,375.00,WENNINGTON, WILLIAM 4,522.46,WEST COAST SAILING, INC
2,831.41,WEST GROUP PAYMENT CENTER 3,261.77,WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES CO 7,188.06,WESTMAN FREIGHTLINER 169,612.47,WET
SOLUTIONS, INC. 6,139.88,WHIPPLE CONSULTING LLC. 21,649.00,WHOLESALE DIRECT INC 3,542.79,WINDY CITY LIGHTS, INC.
14,699.52,WIRFS INDUSTRIES INC 20,280.55,WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP, INC 4,851.56,WRIGHT BENEFIT STRATEGIES INC
30,000.00,XEROX GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS LLC 3,665.00,XO HOLDINGS 10,400.31,YORRO, JOANNE 5,333.11,YOUTH ELITE SOCCER, LLC
5,088.75,YUTKA FENCE INC. 3,694.00,ZIM SAILING 3,637.50,ZION LANDFILL T1 337,546.86,ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION 5,603.01
TOTAL VENDORS $41,018,573.60
18
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF CONDITION
Discretely
Presented
Special Capital Debt Internal Component
General Revenue Projects Service Enterprise Service Fiduciary Unit
Revenues 35,889,161$ 10,971,747$ 2,661,498$ 2,422,180$ 11,823,479$ 8,755,962$ (16,038)$ 4,043,691$
Expenditures (30,901,596) (10,305,288) (8,629,952) (2,915,603) (11,469,693) (8,299,729) (30,427) (3,637,846)
Excess of
Revenues Over
(Under)
Expenditures 4,987,565 666,459 (5,968,454) (493,423) 353,786 456,233 (46,465) 405,845
Transfers In - 565,189 1,618,719 662,413 46,000 -
Transfers Out (2,551,741) (46,000) - (297,580) - -
Debt issuance - -
installment contract -
Bond Proceeds - 9,886,384 - -
Other 830,080 5,373 67,851 -
Net Increase
(Decease) in
Fund Balance 3,265,904 1,191,021 5,604,500 (128,590) 399,786 456,233 (46,465) 405,845
Previous Year
Fund Balance 20,516,289 9,589,576 4,139,594 1,805,602 * 8,006,836 * 6,389,939 521,563 1,395,134
Other - - - - - - - -
Current Year
Ending Fund Balance 23,782,193$ 10,780,597$ 9,744,094$ 1,677,012$ 399,786$ 456,233$ 475,098$ 2,236,963$
* Beginning Fund Balance restated for GASB68 calculations
Total Debt Outstanding
Beginning of Issued Current Retired Current Outstanding
Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year End of Year
51,626,760$ 9,780,000 3,495,219 57,911,541$
Subscribed and sworn to this 17th of October, 2016
I, Margaret Boyer, City Clerk of The City of Lake Forest, Lake County, Illinois, do hereby certify that the above is a true copy of the Annual Treasurer's Report
for the fiscal year ending April 30, 2016
Elizabeth A. Holleb, City Treasurer
Margaret Boyer, City Clerk
19
4076275.01.03 - cash defeasance ordinance
2246320
EXTRACT OF MINUTES of a regular public meeting of the City
Council of the City of Lake Forest, Lake County, Illinois, held at
City Hall, 220 East Deerpath, in the City, at 6:30 o’clock P.M. on
the 7th day of November, 2016.
The Mayor called the meeting to order and directed the City Clerk to call the roll. Upon
the roll being called, Donald P. Schoenheider, the Mayor, and the following Aldermen were
physically present at said location: __________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
The following Aldermen were allowed by a majority of the Aldermen in accordance with
and to the extent allowed by rules adopted by the City Council to attend the meeting by video or
audio conference: _______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
No Alderman was not permitted to attend the meeting by video or audio conference.
The following Aldermen were absent and did not participate in the meeting in any manner
or to any extent whatsoever: _______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Alderman ____________________ announced that the next item on the agenda was the
consideration of an ordinance providing for the redemption and payment prior to maturity of a
portion of the City’s outstanding General Obligation Bonds, Series 2008.
WHEREUPON, Alderman _________________________ presented, and the City Clerk
made available to the Aldermen and interested members of the public, complete copies of an
ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE providing for the redemption and payment prior to
maturity of $6,105,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2008, of
the City of Lake Forest, Lake County, Illinois.
(the “Ordinance”).
20
-2-
Alderman ____________________ then moved and Alderman _____________________
seconded the motion that the Ordinance as presented be adopted.
After a full discussion thereof, the Mayor directed that the roll be called for a vote upon
the motion to adopt the Ordinance.
Upon the roll being called, the following Aldermen voted AYE: ____________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
, the following Aldermen voted NAY: ________________________________________________
and the following Alderman abstained from the vote:___________________________________
WHEREUPON, the Mayor declared the motion carried and the Ordinance adopted, and
henceforth did approve and sign the same in open meeting, and did direct the City Clerk to record
the same in full in the records of the City Council of the City of Lake Forest, Lake County,
Illinois.
Other business was duly transacted at said meeting.
Upon motion duly made and carried, the meeting adjourned.
_______________________________________
City Clerk
21
ORDINANCE providing for the redemption and payment prior to
maturity of $6,105,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2008, of
the City of Lake Forest, Lake County, Illinois.
* * *
WHEREAS, the City of Lake Forest, Lake County, Illinois (the “City”), has elected
pursuant to the provisions of the 1970 Constitution of the State of Illinois and particularly
Article VII, Section 6(a) thereof, to become a home rule unit and as such may exercise any power
or perform any function pertaining to its government and affairs; and
WHEREAS, the City has previously issued and there are currently outstanding General
Obligation Bonds, Series 2008 (the “Bonds”); and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City (the “Council”) has determined that the City has
funds on hand and lawfully available in the amount of $6,105,000, being lawfully available funds
of the City from the sale of certain City property, excess fund balance reserves within the City’s
General Fund and excess fund balance reserves in the debt service fund related to the Bonds (the
“Available Funds”); and
WHEREAS, the Available Funds are sufficient to provide for the payment of a portion of
the outstanding Bonds prior to maturity; and
WHEREAS, the Council hereby finds that it is in the best interests of the City to apply the
Available Funds to the payment of the outstanding Bonds maturing on December 15 of the years
and in the amounts and bearing interest at the rates per annum as follows (the “Defeased
Bonds”):
YEAR OF
MATURITY
PRINCIPAL
AMOUNT ($)
RATE OF
INTEREST (%)
2017 600,000 3.375
2018 615,000 3.500
2019 635,000 3.500
2020 465,000 3.500
2021 485,000 3.625
22
-2-
YEAR OF
MATURITY
PRINCIPAL
AMOUNT ($)
RATE OF
INTEREST (%)
2022 500,000 3.625
2023 520,000 3.625
2024 540,000 3,750
2025 560,000 3.750
2026 580,000 3.875
2027 605,000 3.875
; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with their terms, the Defeased Bonds may be called for
redemption in advance of their respective maturities, and it is necessary and desirable to make
such call for the redemption of the Defeased Bonds on their earliest possible call date, and
provide for the giving of proper notice to the registered owners of the Defeased Bonds; and
WHEREAS, in order to properly provide for the payment of the Defeased Bonds, it will be
necessary to irrevocably deposit the Available Funds with the paying agent for the Defeased
Bonds, namely, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Minneapolis, Minnesota (the “Paying
Agent”), which funds will be used to pay the the Defeased Bonds on their call date after the
Paying Agent provides the proper call notice:
NOW, THEREFORE, Be It Ordained by the City Council of the City of Lake Forest, Lake
County, Illinois, in exercise of its home rule powers as follows:
Section 1. Incorporation of Preambles. The Council hereby finds that all of the
recitals contained in the preambles to this Ordinance are full, true and correct and does
incorporate them into this Ordinance by this reference.
Section 2. Transfer and Deposit of Moneys with the Paying Agent. The City Treasurer
of the City is hereby authorized and directed forthwith to transfer the Available Funds to the
Paying Agent. The Available Funds are hereby appropriated from funds of the City on hand and
legally available and shall be irrevocably deposited with the Paying Agent on or before
23
-3-
December 15, 2016, so as to provide for the payment of the principal of and interest on the
Defeased Bonds as called for redemption on December 15, 2016.
Section 3. Call of the Defeased Bonds. In accordance with the redemption provisions
of the ordinance authorizing the Bonds, the City by the Council does hereby make provision for
the payment of and does hereby call the Defeased Bonds for redemption on December 15, 2016.
Section 4. Certificate of Reduction of Taxes. The City Treasurer of the City be and the
same is hereby directed to prepare and file with the County Clerk of The County of Lake, Illinois,
a Certificate of Reduction of Taxes Heretofore Levied for the Payment of Bonds showing the
Defeased Bonds being paid and directing the abatement of taxes heretofore levied to pay the
Defeased Bonds.
Section 5. Severability. If any section, paragraph, clause or provision of this
Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or
unenforceability of such section, paragraph or provision shall not affect any of the remaining
provisions of this Ordinance.
24
-4-
Section 6. Superseder and Effective Date. All ordinances, resolutions, and orders, or
parts thereof, in conflict herewith, are to the extent of such conflict hereby superseded, and this
Ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and approval.
ADOPTED: November 7, 2016
AYES: _________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
NAYS: _________________________________________________________
ABSENT: _________________________________________________________
Approved: November 7, 2016
_______________________________________
Mayor, City of Lake Forest,
Lake County, Illinois
ATTEST:
__________________________________
City Clerk, City of Lake Forest,
Lake County, Illinois
Recorded in the City Records on November 7, 2016.
25
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
) SS
COUNTY OF LAKE )
CERTIFICATION OF ORDINANCE AND MINUTES
I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that I am the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of
the City of Lake Forest, Lake County, Illinois (the “City”), and as such official I am the keeper
of the records and files of the City Council of the City (the “Council”).
I do further certify that the foregoing constitutes a full, true and complete transcript of the
minutes of the meeting of the Council held on the 7th day of November, 2016, insofar as same
relates to the adoption of Ordinance No. 2016-__ entitled:
ORDINANCE providing for the redemption and payment prior to
maturity of $6,105,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2008, of
the City of Lake Forest, Lake County, Illinois.
a true, correct and complete copy of which said ordinance as adopted at said meeting appears in
the foregoing transcript of the minutes of said meeting.
I do further certify that the deliberations of the Council on the adoption of said ordinance
were conducted openly, that the vote on the adoption of said ordinance was taken openly, that
said meeting was held at a specified time and place convenient to the public, that notice of said
meeting was duly given to all of the news media requesting such notice, that an agenda for said
meeting was posted at the location where said meeting was held and at the principal office of the
Council at least 72 hours in advance of the holding of said meeting, that at least one copy of said
agenda was continuously available for public review during the entire 72-hour period preceding
said meeting, that said agenda contained a separate specific item concerning the proposed
adoption of said ordinance, a true, correct and complete copy of the agenda as so posted being
attached hereto as Exhibit A, that said meeting was called and held in strict compliance with the
provisions the Open Meetings Act of the State of Illinois, as amended, and with the provisions of
the Illinois Municipal Code, as amended, and that the Council has complied with all of the
applicable provisions of said Act and said Code and its procedural rules in the adoption of said
ordinance.
26
-2-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto affix my official signature and the seal of the City, this
7th day of November, 2016.
_______________________________________
City Clerk
[SEAL]
[Clerk to attach agenda]
27
The City of Lake Forest
CITY COUNCIL
Proceedings of the Monday October 3, 2016
City Council Meeting - City Council Chambers – 6:30pm
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Honorable Mayor Schoenheider called the meeting to order at 6:35pm,
and City Clerk Margaret Boyer called the roll of Council members.
Present: Honorable Mayor Schoenheider, Alderman Waldeck, Alderman Beidler, Alderman Pandaleon,
Alderman Newman, Alderman Tack, Alderman Reisenberg, Alderman Adelman and Alderman Moreno.
Absent: None.
Also present were: Robert Kiely, City Manager; Victor Filippini, City Attorney; Catherine Czerniak, Director of
Community Development; Elizabeth Holleb, Finance Director; Susan Banks, Communications Manager;
Michael Thomas, Director of Public Works; Chuck Myers, Superintendent of Parks & Forestry, Karl Walldorf,
Chief of Police; Rob Copeland, Deputy Chief of Police; Pete Siebert, Acting Fire Chief, Craig Lepkowski,
Commander; Mike Strong, Assistant to the City Manager, Anne Whipple and numerous members of the
Lake Forest Police Department.
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 6:30 pm
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS
1. COMMENTS BY MAYOR
Mayor Schoenheider invited all to Oktoberfest, sponsored by the Friends of Lake Forest Parks and
Recreation on Saturday. The mayor then swore in the new Deputy Chief and Sergeant. Photos were
taken.
A. Swear in Deputy Police Chief Rob Copeland
B. Swear in Sergeant Brett Marquette
2. COMMENTS BY CITY MANAGER
A. Community Spotlight
-Lake Forest College
- Steve Schutt
City Manager Robert Kiely Jr. introduced Lake Forest College President Steve Schutt. Mr. Schutt reported
that the ground breaking ceremony for the Science Center will be Friday. He gave a brief overview of
upcoming events and reported that Lake Forest College was listed in The Princeton Review as a top 20
school and that Lake Forest College ranked 17 as having the “happiest students in the country”. Mr. Schutt
then introduced Rafael Omatis, Lake Forest College Senior, and Cole Pedro, first year City Liaison, who
28
Proceedings of the Monday, October 3, 2016
Regular City Council Meeting
reviewed some of the reasons for the ranking. Those included opportunities in the community, leadership
associations and a compassionate staff at the College.
B. Community Spotlight
-Lake Forest Country Day School
-Bob Whalen- Head of School
City Manager Robert Kiely Jr. introduced Bob Whalen, Head of School. Mr. Whalen stated that he is proud to
have the Day School be part one of the City’s four cornerstones, Education. The School prepares children to
be critical thinkers. Mr. Whalen reported on the opportunity for families to learn about education through
keynote speakers, with the next opportunity occurring on October 27 featuring speaker Jessica Lahey.
Mayor Schoenheider reported that he and some members of the City Council were at the ribbon cutting
ceremony at Life Working, which offers a collaborative work environment. Mayor Schoenheider stated that
this type of new program is leading the way for the community.
3. COMMENTS BY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Mayor Schoenheider reported that, in the spring of 2016, he asked that the City take a proactive position
and create a marketing campaign for Lake Forest.
LAKE FOREST MARKETING CAMPAIGN
1. Consideration to Waive Purchasing Requirement for Competitive Pricing per Administrative
Directive 3-5, and Award a Contract for Professional Services to Provide Marketing
Consultation Services by Brandstorm! for the Lake Forest Marketing Campaign in the amount
of $30,000
Alderman Beidler reported that beginning in early 2016, the staff and City Council began hearing from
residents and local realtors about:
• The current abundant housing inventory and length of time on the market
• The need for more diverse housing
• The need to promote Lake Forest’s assets to a younger demographic and boost economic
development
• And most importantly, the ability to sustain this very special community. There is a lot to promote
about Lake Forest. A recent article was published in the Daily North Shore about Lake Forest Day,
quoting a young boy saying that he thought Lake Forest Day was great because “Lake Forest has its
own holiday!”
Alderman Beidler stated that Mayor Schoenheider announced the City’s plans to develop a marketing plan
at the May 16 City Council meeting and again at the July 13 Chamber of Commerce Annual Luncheon. Mayor
Schoenheider appointed Alderman Beidler to head up an ad hoc committee to work on promoting Lake
Forest, welcoming new residents and welcoming back younger people who grew up here and may want to
return to Lake Forest to raise their families.
Alderman Beidler reported that the Lake Forest Welcome Campaign has two goals: 1) To promote the City
and its assets to attract new residents, young families, students, businesses, visitors, shoppers and diners
and 2) To encourage residents, businesses owners and employees to act as advocates for Lake Forest.
Alderman Beidler has been working since July with the Chamber of Commerce and real estate professional
Deb Fischer, Susan Kelsey, Economic Development Coordinator, and Susan Banks, Communications
29
Proceedings of the Monday, October 3, 2016
Regular City Council Meeting
Manager. Also, Phil Gayter, whose proposal is before you this evening, is here as well to answer any
additional questions the Council may have.
Alderman Beidler reported that several local realtors have already begun promoting Lake Forest’s assets by
listing the “Top Ten” reasons to live here, or why Lake Forest is the “best-kept secret.”
The Committee has spent the summer talking with interested residents, business owners, real estate
professionals and marketing/advertising professionals and there is great enthusiasm for the project and a
lot of input gathered. Alderman Beidler explained that most importantly the Resident Survey, available until
October 17, will provide the committee with more data.
Karl Stelter, who grew up in Lake Forest, now a young professional film maker based in Los Angeles, is
creating a series of 15-second to 5-minute films that authentically promote the image of Lake Forest and its
4 cornerstones of Family, Education, Tradition and Philanthropy. Karl spent a week in Lake Forest in
September capturing: 15 interviews, 7+ hours of interview footage and 1,500+ video clips from 30+
locations including the LFHS Homecoming Football Game. A sneak preview of Karl’s work will be presented
at the Tuesday, November 1 Town Hall Meeting in the John Hughes Theater at Gorton at 7 p.m.
Alderman Beidler reported that if the Council approves Phil Gayter’s proposal and scope of work. A
Marketing Team of no more than 8-10 people will be created. The team expects to have specialized reports
prepared to present to the City Council throughout this winter and next spring, detailing the Committee’s
work and progress to date, as well as any measurable results.
Alderman Beidler reported on the proposed budget over three years; $18,500 Video Production
Short films, comprehensive film and edited cutdowns for social media, $30,000 Marketing Advisement and
“Brandstorming”, Concept Creation, Production and Maintenance and an estimated total of $50,000 Media
Buys (estimated). Alderman Beidler reported that the entire expenditure can be recouped if 8 houses are
sold in Lake Forest per year, based on average residential Real Estate Transfer Tax income.
Alderman Beidler reviewed the Campaign Success Measurements that included RETT revenues,
restaurant/food sales tax, home sales and price of home sales, press coverage, social media and website
impressions/analytics, District 67 enrollment and the number of new residents.
Alderman Beidler added that this campaign will not be successful without crucial input from the entire
community and encouraged all residents and business owners to act as advocates for Lake Forest and
encourage sharing stories, photos and videos with the City. Alderman Beidler reminder residents that the
Resident Survey was mailed to all Lake Forest household on September 7, and is on the City’s website until
October 17.
The City Council had a great deal of discussion on the long term health and viability of the City. The City
Council also had discussion on the consideration of waiving the purchasing requirement for competitive
pricing, and discussed the option of having more information given to the Council on the topic and holding
the vote until the next meeting.
City Manager, Robert Kiely reported that the contract is one for professional services, and this contract is no
different that the City Council has seen in the past from Engineering as an example. The Committee has
done its due diligence through its course of interviews and refining the scope of services. Other proposals
came in at much higher pricing. The Committee felt unanimously that Mr. Gayter is the best fit when
compares to financial terms of others who were interviewed and best fit when it came to understanding the
needs of the City.
Mayor Schoenheider asked if there was anyone form the public who would like to comment. Seeing none,
he asked for a motion.
30
Proceedings of the Monday, October 3, 2016
Regular City Council Meeting
COUNCIL ACTION: Waive Purchasing Requirement for Competitive Pricing per Administrative Directive 3-
5, and Award a Contract for Professional Services to Provide Marketing Consultation Services by
Brandstorm! for the Lake Forest Marketing Campaign in the amount of $30,000
Alderman Reisenberg made a motion to waive Purchasing Requirement for Competitive Pricing per
Administrative Directive 3-5, and Award a Contract for Professional Services to Provide Marketing
Consultation Services by Brandstorm! for the Lake Forest Marketing Campaign in the amount of $30,000,
seconded by Alderman Beidler. The following voted “Yey”: Aldermen Waldeck, Beidler, Pandaleon,
Newman, Tack, Reisenberg, Adelman and Moreno. The following voted “Nay”: None. 8 Yeas, 0 Nays, motion
carried.
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
1. Consideration of a Resolution to Encourage and Facilitate the Replacement of Lead Water
Services. (Approve by Motion)
Alderman Waldeck, Chairman of the Public Works Committee, reported that the Council is asked to consider
a Resolution to increase awareness of lead water service lines and to offer encouragement and support to
the owners of properties which have lead services to remove and replace those services.
Chairman Waldeck stated that recently, in order to educate and assist homeowners, the Public Works
Department reviewed City files and identified about 300 properties that, based on available information,
may have lead water services. 300 letters were sent to alert owners of those properties that lead service
may be present and to offer “no cost” City inspections to verify whether or not lead services exist. A
number of inspections have been conducted and in some cases, City inspectors found that lead services no
longer exist. In other cases, where lead services were found, some owners expressed interest in replacing
the lead services.
Alderman Waldeck reported that at its September 19, 2016, the Public Works Committee directed staff to
present a Resolution for Council consideration in an effort to encourage and facilitate the full replacement
of lead water services, from the point of connection at the water main, to the connection at the water
meter or foundation. And that for a period of two years, standard permit fees for the replacement of lead
service lines will be waived.
Chairman Waldeck reported that the City’s Water Plant and the water quality are regularly monitored and
consistently meet all IEPA standards. In addition, the City has a corrosion control program through which
lead pipes are coated to reduce the likelihood of exposure to lead. Also, the City is working to raise
awareness of lead water service lines out of an abundance of caution.
Michael Thomas, Director of Public works, reported that the proposed two year waiver of permit fees will
result in some lost revenues for the City. Depending on the specific conditions for each property, the waiver
of fees for replacement of a lead water service line ranges from $600 to $1,400, and a general connection
cost estimate of $10 to $12,000.
The City Council had discussion on the length of time the fees would be waived, the cost of connection, how
the connection would be made and the general location of where most lead service pipes are located, with
the majority being in Ward 1 and a few in Ward 2 near the South Park area.
31
Proceedings of the Monday, October 3, 2016
Regular City Council Meeting
Mayor Schoenheider asked if there was anyone from the public who would like to comment. Seeing none,
he asked for a motion.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve a motion in support of a Resolution encouraging and facilitating the
replacement of lead water service lines.
Mayor Schoenheider reported that Alderman Tack would like to follow up from the September 19, City
Council workshop. Alderman Tack stated that the Fire 2020 Committee’s findings were an issue of
economics. He noted that the media reports of that meeting may have been misunderstood or under-
reported the facts. Instead of sending a letter, he would like to read an open letter to the press.
“For the past two years I have had the opportunity to participate as an Alderman on the City's Fire Vision
2020 committee. Other members of the committee included an Alderman, 4 citizen representatives, Chiefs
of the Fire and Police departments, as well as City Staff including the City Manager, Finance Director, and
Director of Public Works. The committee was tasked with reviewing the operations and finances of the Lake
Forest Fire Department with an eye toward establishing a fiscally viable operational plan that would be
sustainable for the foreseeable future. The committee was provided with all applicable information
regarding operational, capital, and financial aspects of the Fire Department. Particular attention was paid to
opportunities for improving operational efficiency, enhancing revenue generation, and reducing capital
expenditures. The budgetary trends of the department were examined in great detail in the context of the
budgetary limitations affecting overall City operations as projected over the next 10 years. The committee
heard from consultants who have worked with other municipalities on improving operational efficiencies, as
well as transitions to alternative models of providing fire and EMS services. Our discussions were always
based on the understanding that all changes would need to be considered with the goal of maintaining, or
improving, current levels of public safety. Trends in other public welfare arenas, such as healthcare, were
also reviewed to determine applicability to our task of improving the sustainability, efficiency, and quality,
of our municipal fire service.
After initial discussion of the trends and options for improving fiscal and operational efficiency of our Fire
Services, the limitations applicable to changing operations of the department were reviewed. These
included the limited effects of many changes on the financial viability of the department, as well as
personnel, and contractual restrictions. It was determined early on in the process that few operational
changes within the current operating model provided significant benefits on either the quality or financial
aspects of the department. It was also discovered that the contractual restrictions imposed by union
contracts, and state imposed pension funding requirements, were the primary impediments to obtaining a
fiscally sound budget for departmental operations and creation of a long term plan for operating the Fire
Department via the current model.
As currently structured 99% of the Fire Departments costs are personnel related and subject to contractual
and State imposed limitations. Of these immutable costs the requirements for pension funding are clearly
the most important factor affecting the fiscal viability of providing Fire and EMS services under the status
quo. Public safety pension contributions from the City are currently increasing at an annual rate in excess of
8% per year. Next years increase alone will approximate 250,000$. With a doubling time of < 9 years City
pension contributions for public safety will exceed 3 million dollars per year by 2026. Unaltered, the growth
of public safety pension obligations alone will require massive tax and fee increases, as well as severe cuts in
other governmental services in order to merely fund the annual increases. The committee determined that
there were no significant opportunities for revenue enhancement or fiscal efficiencies within the Fire
Department that could meaningfully contribute to mitigation of these clearly unsustainable financial trends.
In light of the incontrovertible evidence of the intermediate and long term non-viability of the current
model of providing Fire and EMS services by the City of Lake Forest, as established by the Fire Vision 2020
32
Proceedings of the Monday, October 3, 2016
Regular City Council Meeting
committee, it is time for the residents of Lake Forest to seriously consider the adoption of alternative
models for the provision of these services that can establish long term fiscal viability. Numerous models
exist which offer meaningful improvements in fiscal sustainability. These range from the establishment of
an all-volunteer fire service with outsourcing of EMS services to the creation of a regional consolidated fire
protection district. Intermediate options may also exist. What is clear is that the status quo is not an option.
In the near future a proposal to enact a “Public Safety Pension Fee " will be presented to the City Council.
Such a fee, if enacted, will provide a 1-2 year window for the City to research and implement an alternative
sustainable model for the provision of Fire and EMS services. By no means will such a fee allow inaction or
maintenance the status quo. The obvious implication of this proposal is that the residents must
immediately engage in the process with the City of identifying an appropriate replacement model for the
Fire Department. This will require courage and vision on the part of your elected officials, as well as City
staff, and engagement of the citizenry in a positive way. Failure to act expeditiously will not benefit the City
or its residents in any way, but will result in a need to act precipitously in the future without the benefit of
time for thoughtful deliberation.
It is worth noting that the need for action on this matter is based on fiscal issues and not on any deficit of
our professional firefighter/paramedic staff. Their professionalism represents the best of Lake Forest. The
decisions that resulted in the need for action were made remotely, and are not amenable to local
remediation. The actions necessary to solve our crisis are ours alone to take. Now is the time.”
Mayor Schoenheider thanked Alderman Tack for his input.
OPPORTUNITY FOR CITIZENS TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
None.
ITEMS FOR OMNIBUS VOTE CONSIDERATION
1. Approval of the September 6, 2016 City Council Meeting Minutes
2. Approval of the September 19, 2016 City Council Workshop Meeting Minutes
3. Ratify Proclamation given to Ragdale on September 17, 2016
4. Red Ribbon Week Proclamation October 24-31, 2016
5. Approval of Check Register for period August 27- September 23, 2016
6. Consideration of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 75 of the City Code, as Recommended by
City Staff. (Final Approval)
7. Consideration of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 98 of the City Code, as Recommended by
City Staff. (Final Approval)
8. Consideration of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 78 of the City Code, as Recommended by
City Staff. (First Reading and if Desired by the City Council, Final Approval)
9. Consideration of Ordinance Approving a Recommendation from the Building Review Board.
(First Reading and if Desired by the City Council, Final Approval)
COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of the nine (9) Omnibus items as presented
33
Proceedings of the Monday, October 3, 2016
Regular City Council Meeting
Mayor Schoenheider asked members of the Council if they would like to remove any item or take it
separately. Alderman Beidler made public that she has a close personal relationship with the homeowners,
her daughter-in-law was the realtor. She would leave it up to the City Council if they would like her to recuse
herself from voting on the item. Mayor Schoenheider asked if there was anyone on the Council who would
like Alderman Beidler to recuse herself from that vote. Seeing none. Mayor Schoenheider asked for a
motion to approve the nine Omnibus items as presented.
Alderman Reisenberg made a motion to approve the nine Omnibus items as presented, seconded by
Alderman Beidler. The following voted “Yey”: Aldermen Waldeck, Beidler, Pandaleon, Newman, Tack,
Reisenberg, Adelman and Moreno. The following voted “Nay”: None. 8 Yeas, 0 Nays, motion carried.
Information such as Purpose and Action Requested, Background/Discussion, Budget/Fiscal Impact,
Recommended Action and a Staff Contact as it relates to the Omnibus items can be found on the agenda.
ORDINANCES
ORDINANCES AFFECTING CODE AMENDMENTS
NEW BUSINESS
1. Discussion on the Future of Fire/EMS Services within the Community and Related Public
Safety Pension Contributions
Robert Kiely Jr., City Manager, stated that this issue is a complex one and that the City of Lake Forest is not
the only community which needs a solution. The City of Lake Forest has a track record of taking action well
in advance of the immediate need. The City Manager publicly thanked Alderman Tack and Moreno for their
work and for their help in guiding the conversation.
Mr. Kiely gave an overview of what will be heard at the Council meeting:
• Timeline
• Committee Purpose & Goals
• Background / History
• Call Volume Activity
• Financial Implications
• Critical Issues
• Opportunities & Recommendations
Mr. Kiely reported that the City of Lake Forest was part of the 2010-2012: Fire/EMS Shared Services
Analysis between Lake Forest, Lake Bluff, Highland Park and Highwood study. In January 2013, the City
created a Task Force on Fire & EMS Shared Services. In September 2014, the City created a contract with
Glenview for Central Dispatching, and in July 2014, the City created the LF Fire Service 2020 Committee,
reconstituting the 2020 Committee in March 2016.
34
Proceedings of the Monday, October 3, 2016
Regular City Council Meeting
Mr. Kiely reviewed the Committees goals that included:
• Critical Importance of Public Safety & its Long-Term Affordability
• Understand Service Levels and Operational Demands
• Corresponding Manpower & Equipment Requirements
• Analyze the Cost Structure and Projected Growth Trends
• Identify Legal/Legislative Restraints to Alternative Systems or Approaches
Understanding that there is no one answer, the City Manager remarked that the challenge is to address and
recognize the importance Public Safety plays within the Community. Public Safety is always the City’s top
concern. Mr. Kiely stated that there are a lot of issues here that are controlled by legislators, legal restraints
and Illinois rules and regulations.
The City Manager then gave an overview of the history of the fire Department:
• Fire Dept. est. in 1893 as volunteer dept.
• Began hiring full-time employees in 1913
• Implemented EMS service in 1974
• Accredited by CFAI in 2010; Re-Accredited in 2015
• ISO Rating of 3 (pending)
• Currently have 35 full-time employees (33 Uniform, 2 civilian)
• Two Fire Stations
• 16 Vehicles
• FY17 Budget - $6,250,038 (98% personnel)
The City Manager also talked about call volume using the graph below:
Series Description
Auto
Aid
Given
Auto Aid
Received
Mutual
Aid
Given
Mutual
Aid
Received
No Aid
Provided
Special
Call/
No
Response
Grand
Total
100 Fire 2 3 14 6 8 - 33
200
Overpressure
Rupture,
Explosion,
Overheat (No
Fire)
- 1 - - 3 - 4
35
Proceedings of the Monday, October 3, 2016
Regular City Council Meeting
300
Rescue and
Emergency
Medical
Service (EMS)
Incidents
76 1 27 27 1,623 - 1,754
400
Hazardous
Condition (No
Fire)
7 9 4 6 110 - 136
500 Service Call 2 2 29 3 237 - 273
600 Good Intent
Call 122 4 30 3 87 - 246
700 False Alarm
and False Call 63 93 2 6 446 - 610
800
Severe
Weather and
Natural
Disaster
- - - - - - -
900
Special Service
Call/No
Response
- - - - - 34 34
Grand Total 272 113 106 51 2,514 34 3,090
*Automatic Aid is provided/received by contractual agreement with other Departments or Districts
(Bannockburn/Deerfield, Highland Park/Highwood, Lake Bluff, Libertyville, Lincolnshire, Mettawa)
*Mutual Aid provided/received via participation in Mutual Aid Box Alarm System (MABAS) which
automatically dispatches resources to assist with call response
*No Aid provided includes calls for service to the Department that were unassisted by external agencies
*Special Calls/No Response include test calls, dropped calls, or other calls that did not require the
Department to dispatch resources.
The City Manager noted that The City of Lake Forest gives more aid to other communities than it receives.
Of all aid given, the City gave 12% and received 5%.
The City Manager then introduced Elizabeth Holleb, Finance Director, who reviewed long-term financial
forecasting in the general fund using the table below.
36
Proceedings of the Monday, October 3, 2016
Regular City Council Meeting
Ms. Holleb went on to review staffing levels and personnel costs in relation to the budget, stating that
personnel costs represent 70% of the budget. Ms. Holleb used a graph to depict how the cumulative
increase in personnel costs per FTE (full time equivalent) has outpaced the growth in general fund revenue
since 2006. In FY2013 the gap was -20%, in 2017 the gap is -41% in 2019 the gap is -52%. To see the gap as
equated to dollars in FY2013 its $750,000. FY2017 will represent $2.6 million and in FY2019 the gap will
represent $3.6 million.
The City has reduced some of the gap with a reduction in personnel since 2006. Previously, the City of Lake
Forest had 249 full time employees and currently is budgeted for 213. Ms. Holleb reported that the Public
Safety pension obligations made by the City of Lake Forest meet or exceed pension obligations. The City of
Lake Forest has no say in police or fire pension plans. Ms. Holleb talked about investment returns relating to
Police and Fire Pensions.
Ms. Holleb noted that while it's a conservative estimate, the actuary provides an assumption based on
funding policy and the assumptions of the City of Lake Forest. That means that contributing requirements
for active police and fire personnel are determined by state statute.
The state statute state says that the pension must be funded 90% by 2040 in the City of Lake Forest goes
with a funding of 100% amortizing that 10% percent for 2040.
The actuary actually uses a smoothing effort for investment returns over five years. Decisions from the
general assembly put boundaries on what the pension can invest in.
ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021
Fund Balance 5/1 14,654,428 17,515,664 20,424,000 20,085,090 21,348,881 21,961,015 21,881,995 21,126,291
Revenue 32,963,689 33,546,478 33,250,536 33,645,733 34,314,999 34,976,662 35,678,839 36,637,814
Operating Expenses 28,957,453 29,888,142 31,302,014 32,381,942 33,702,865 35,055,682 36,434,543 37,831,416
Net before CIP 4,006,236 3,658,336 1,948,522 1,263,791 612,134 (79,020) (755,704) (1,193,602)
Capital Expenditures 1,145,000 750,000 475,000 - - - - -
Use of Paid Parking Reserves 957,420
Regency Lane SSA Financing 855,012
ERI Payoff from Reserves
Fund Balance 4/30 17,515,664 20,424,000 20,085,090 21,348,881 21,961,015 21,881,995 21,126,291 19,932,689
Nonspendable Fund Balance 4/30 2,126,990 1,648,832 1,648,832 1,648,832 1,648,832 1,648,832 1,648,832 1,648,832
Assigned FB - Financial System 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000
Less: 35% Req Resv+ Sick/Vaca+$957k Parking*10,740,728 14,159,041 13,098,042 13,236,361 13,470,604 13,702,186 13,947,948 14,283,589
- change to 35% for FY15
Available Funds 4,647,946 4,616,127 4,138,216 5,263,688 5,641,579 5,330,977 4,329,511 2,800,268
Op Revenue increase%2.6% 1.8% -0.9% 1.2% 2.0% 1.9% 2.0% 2.7%
Op Expense increase % 4.1% 3.2% 4.7% 3.5% 4.1% 4.0% 3.9% 3.8%
FB as % of revenue 53.1% 60.9% 60.4% 63.5% 64.0% 62.6% 59.2% 54.4%
* Parking reserve expended in FY2016 and no longer part of minimum fund balance.
Note: Fund balance schedule in budget includes fund 101 and fund 120 in General Fund line - excluded here.
THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST
FIVE YEAR FUND BALANCE FORECAST
GENERAL FUND
37
Proceedings of the Monday, October 3, 2016
Regular City Council Meeting
IMRF is handled differently at the state level, GASB 68 says that in the FY16 relating to financial statements,
there's a requirement to show the pensions on the face of the financial statement.
Public Safety pension costs have increased from $1.2 million in FY2005 to $3.1 million in FY2017. Current
projections forecast another $3.6 million increase to $6.7 million annually by FY2027. Annual contributions
will continue to grow through FY2040 – the current projected date for full funding.
As a benchmark, the City’s tax levy requirement in 2017 is projected to be 8.9% over the previous year,
which is far in excess of the tax cap at .7%.
2016 Tax Levy Requirement:
City Manager Robert Kiely reported on critical decisions, including service level expectations and response;
aging populations, advance technology, city codes, staffing & cost of personnel and equipment type and
replacement schedule.
He discuss opportunities and what each of those opportunities means; status quo, increase revenue,
review/modify service levels, manage costs, consolidation / shared services / IGA, capital equipment,
contract out Fire and/or EMS services.
The City Manager reported Identifying and implementing a sustainable and innovative framework for
providing Fire/EMS service levels commensurate with resident expectations is a complex issue that must be
deliberated methodically, transparently and with the cooperation of neighboring governmental agencies.
Meaningful and enduring organizational strategies will need to be both short-term and long-term in nature
He laid out the following:
• Short-term Strategy:
• Identify supplemental revenue source(s) for pension contribution
The projected increase in public safety pension contributions for the 2016 tax levy in 8.9% or $ 254,976.00.
This increase cannot be adequately covered by the tax cap of 0.7% or $ 206,701.00. The Committee has
suggested various revenue sources be considered to bridge the gap until a more permanent and sustainable
cost-structure can be implemented. A potential revenue source would be a pension funding fee added to
the water billing.
• Intermediate Strategy:
• Identify additional operating efficiencies, update codes, examine
response protocols and reevaluate existing aid agreements
While the City engages in discussion with neighboring communities on consolidation, shared services or
alternative governance models, steps should be taken to identify opportunities to continue “doing more
2015 Levy
Required
2016 Levy
Required
Percent
Increase
Fire $1,137,826 $1,298,188 14.1%
Police 1,737,445 1,832,059 5.4%
Combined $2,875,271 $3,130,247 8.9%
PTELL (Tax Cap) .7%
38
Proceedings of the Monday, October 3, 2016
Regular City Council Meeting
with less” including but not limited to the following. 1) Opportunities for additional operational efficiencies,
2) Safety and building code modifications, 3) Extending equipment useful life, 4) Examining existing
response protocols. And, 5) Reevaluating current Mutual Aid agreements and other related considerations.
• Long-term Strategy:
• Actively pursue opportunities for collaborative partnerships through
consolidation, shared services or similar framework
The work started in 2010 must be resumed to develop a multi-jurisdictional Fire/EMS institution that
creates greater operational efficiencies while maintaining acceptable service levels. The extensive resources
of the various neighboring agencies should be assessed and deployed, absent any limitation of corporate
borders. The Mayor and the City Manager should contact their counterparts at the respective agencies
inviting them to participate in meaningful deliberations on the creation of a sustainable and innovative
framework for providing residents Fire/EMS Services.
City Manager Kiely also reviewed issues that will be expected in the near future; Resistance to tax/fee
increase, nostalgia, civic attachment to fire operations, how the City is limited by State laws and union
contract limiting/prohibiting alternatives, politics, aversion to “losing control” (Trust) and a willingness to
confront the complex, emotional issues
Mayor Schoenheider stated that the City Council acknowledges safety as the number 1 priority within the
community and safety will never be compromised.
The City Council had lengthy question and answer discussions on each topic with emphasis that status quo is
not an option for a variety of reasons. Additionally, the Council established consensus that in the short term
it would give possible consideration of a Pension Service Fee, as recommended by the Fire Service Vision
2020 Committee to cover the shortfall and that the pension funding solution to is not a just sought for the
Fire Department, it will eventually include the Police Department. Overall, the City Council concurs that a
solution will be multi-faceted.
Mayor Schoenheider asked if there was anyone from the public who would like to comment. Seeing none,
he asked for a motion.
COUNCIL ACTION: Authorize the Mayor and the City Manager to send the proposed letter to neighboring
jurisdictions inviting them to initiate conversations on the subject of Fire/EMS Services.
Alderman Beidler made a motion to authorize the Mayor and the City Manager to send the proposed letter
to neighboring jurisdictions inviting them to initiate conversations on the subject of Fire/EMS Services.,
seconded by Alderman Newman. The following voted “Yea”: Aldermen Waldeck, Beidler, Pandaleon,
Newman, Tack, Reisenberg, Adelman and Moreno. The following voted “Nay”: None. 8 Yeas, 0 Nays, motion
carried.
ADDITIONAL ITEMS FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business. Alderman Newman made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Alderman
Adelman. Motion carried unanimously by voice vote at 9:25 p.m.
39
Proceedings of the Monday, October 3, 2016
Regular City Council Meeting
Respectfully Submitted,
Margaret Boyer
City Clerk
A video of the City Council meeting is available for viewing at the Lake Forest Library and on file in the Clerk’s
office at City Hall. You can also view it on the website by visiting www.cityoflakeforest.com. Click on I Want
To, then click on View, then choose Archived Meetings Videos.
40
Cost Proposal
We propose a fixed fee of $42,075 for this project, based upon our blended hourly rate of $225. Our fee is
inclusive of all travel and incidental expenses.
Phase/Deliverables
Estimated Hours by
Classification
(All classifications) Total Cost by Phase
Phase 0: Project Management
• Project Charter
• Project Plan
• Project Collaboration
Environment
• Project Status Meetings/
Agendas
18 Hours $4,050
Phase 1: Needs Assessment
• Review of supporting
documents
• Onsite departmental
interviews
• Needs Assessment Report
including:
o List of current
deficiencies (Gap
Analysis)
o Options analysis
and
recommendation
o Identification of
EDMS/ERP
standard
functionality overlap
66 Hours $14,850
Following the conclusion of the Phase 1 Needs Assessment the City has the option to
continue to Phase 2 or end the project, if desired.
Phase 2: RFP Development*
• Vendor evaluation strategy
• Vendor selection criteria
• EDMS system
specifications
• Request for Proposal
44 Hours $9,900
41
EDMS Needs Assessment and Selection Page 2
Phase 3: Solution Selection*
• RFP addenda
• Proposal analysis
• Example demonstration
scripts and agenda
• Attend up to 3 days of
demonstrations
• Site visit and reference
checking templates
• System selection synopsis
43 Hours $9,675
Phase 4: Additional Due Diligence*
• Review of vendor
agreements and statement
of work
16 Hours $3,600
Totals 187 hours $42,075
*Optional
42
E MCCORMICK D
R
LONGWOOD DR S MCCORMICK DRT
U
R
I
C
UM
R
D
E WESTLEIGH RD
BEVERLY PLBLUFFSEDGE DRWALDEN LN
S WESTERN
AVE
RO
C
K
E
F
E
L
L
E
R
R
D
E OLD ELM RD
ANDE
R
S
O
N
RDKENDLERCT CIR
C
L
E
L
N
MORNIN
G
S
I
D
E
D
R
LOCH LNDOUGLAS DRS SHER
IDAN
RD
McCormick Drainage
and Ravine Repair Project /
10/12/2016
Proposed FY18 Ravine
repair work
Proposed FY17 Ravine
repair work
Landfill 1
Project
43
Existing Improved
McCormick Ravine
44
Existing Improved
McCormick Ravine
45
{00013429} 1
THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST
ORDINANCE NO. 2016-___
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 95 OF THE CITY CODE
RELATING TO HEALTH AND SANITATION
WHEREAS, The City of Lake Forest is a home rule, special charter municipal
corporation; and
WHEREAS, from time to time it is appropriate to review, update and modify the City
Code of Lake Forest (the “City Code”) to assure that it appropriately addresses new issues that
may arise; and
WHEREAS, at the direction of the City Council, the City Staff, City Attorney, and City
Council Liaison (the “Panel”) reviewed Chapter 95 of the City Code; and
WHEREAS, the Panel determined and recommended that making certain changes to
Chapter 95 will promote a clearer understanding of the Code and thereby would serve the best
interests of the City and its residents; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council, having considered the recommendation of the
Panel, have determined that adopting this Ordinance and amending Chapter 95 of the City
Code as hereinafter set forth, will be in the best interests of the City and its residents;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, COUNTY OF LAKE, STATE OF ILLINOIS, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION ONE: Recitals. The foregoing recitals are hereby adopted by this
reference as the findings of the City Council and are hereby incorporated into this Section as if
fully set forth.
SECTION TWO: Amendment to Chapter 95. Chapter 95, entitled “Health and
Sanitation,” of Title IX, entitled “General Regulations,” of the City Code is hereby amended as
follows:
1. Section 95.002, entitled “Definitions,” is hereby amended in part, as to the definition of
46
{00013429} 2
“Abandoned Vehicle,” which shall hereafter be and read as follows:
§ 95.002 DEFINITIONS.
(A) For the purpose of this subchapter the following terms, phrases, words and
their derivations shall have the meaning given herein below. When not
inconsistent with the context, words, used in the present tense include the future
tense, words used in the plural number include the singular number and words
used in the singular number include the plural number. The word “shall” is always
mandatory and not merely directory.
ABANDONED VEHICLE.
(a) Any vehicle which is left on any public or private property and in view
of the general public for such time and under such circumstances as to appear
that the owner has voluntarily relinquished all right, interest and possession with
the intention of terminating his or her ownership, shall be considered
an ABANDONED VEHICLE.
(b) Any vehicle which is upon private property and which has not been
moved for a period of at least 15 days or and is unlicensed by the state and the
appropriate municipal authority, shall be considered an ABANDONED VEHICLE.
(c) No motor vehicle shall be considered abandoned if the owner has
been granted permission by the city to store said vehicle on his or her own
property, or if such motor vehicle is stored within a garage or building when not in
use, or if the property owner can present proof that the vehicle is in operating
condition and is licensed by the state and the appropriate municipal authority or
that application for such license has been made within the time period allowed by
the state and by the municipal authority.
* * *
2. Sections 95.003 through 95.014 shall hereafter be and read as follows:
§§ 95.003 through 95.014: Reserved.
3. The subchapter entitled “Health Officer” and consisting of Sections 95.015 through
95.019 is hereby amended in part and shall hereafter be and read as follows:
HEALTH OFFICER
§ 95.015 OFFICE CREATED.
There is hereby created the Office of Health Officer, an administrative office of
the city. The Office of Health Officer shall consist of the Health Officer,
Deputy Health Officers, and such other personnel as the Health Officer may
designate from time to time to assist with the performance of the duties set
forth in this Code.
47
{00013429} 3
§ 95.016 APPOINTMENT.
He or she shall be appointed by the Mayor, by and with the approval of the City
Council. The City Manager shall serve as the Health Officer. The Deputy
Health Officers shall be the Director of Community Development, the Chief
of Police, and such other persons as the Health Officer may designate from
time to time. The Deputy Health Officers shall jointly aid in the performance
of all duties set forth in this subchapter, under the direction of the Health
Officer.
§ 95.017 DUTIES.
(A) (1) It shall be the duty of the Health Officer to enforce all ordinances,
rules and regulations containing provisions for the protection of public health,
provided, however, that the duties of the Health Officer shall not include
any such duties that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Lake
County Health Department, Illinois Department of Public Health, or State
Board of Health.
(2) He or she shall perform the duties required of him or her with respect
to the sale and delivery within the city of ice, milk and milk products.
(3) He or she shall make, or cause to be made, inspections of foodstuffs
and beverages, and of the premises used for storing, preparing, serving, and
selling foodstuffs and beverages, including utensils, tools and equipment used
therefor, as may be provided by ordinance; and perform such other duties and
functions as may be required by law or ordinance.
(B) The Health Officer shall maintain liaison with the County Health Department,
and shall inform, coordinate with, and assist the officers, sanitarians and
technicians of the County Health Department in making inspections in the city,
and in enforcing such statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations of the city, the
state and of the County Board of Health as pertain to public health in the city.
§ 95.018 DEPUTIES.
(A) One or more deputies of the Health Officer may be appointed from time to
time as occasion may warrant, by and with the consent of the City Council.
(B) It shall be the duty of every Deputy Health Officer to aid in the enforcement
of the ordinances, rules and regulations relating to public health and to act under
the direction of the Health Officer.
§ 95.01918 REPORTS.
(A) The Health Officer shall make such reports to the City Council as may be
required.
(B) He or she shall also make recommendations for rulings, orders, or
ordinances respecting the public health whenever he or she is requested to do
so, or whenever he or she deems it advisable or necessary so to do.
48
{00013429} 4
§ 95.019: Reserved.
4. Sections 95.020 through 95.029 shall hereafter be and read as follows:
§§ 95.020 through 95.029: Reserved.
5. Sections 95.033 through 95.044 shall hereafter be and read as follows:
§§ 95.033 through 95.044: Reserved.
6. Section 95.047, entitled “Abatement of Nuisances,” is hereby deleted in its entirety and
shall hereafter be and read as follows:
§ 95.047: Reserved.
7. Sections 95.048 through 95.059 shall hereafter be and read as follows:
§§ 95.048 through 95.059: Reserved.
8. Sections 95.067 through 95.079 shall hereafter be and read as follows:
§§ 95.067 through 95.079: Reserved.
9. Section 95.082, entitled “Notice to Eliminate Public Nuisances,” and Section 95.083,
entitled “Filing of Lien and Collection of Cost,” are hereby deleted in their entirety and shall
hereafter be and read as follows:
§§ 95.082 and 95.083: Reserved.
10. Sections 95.084 through 95.094 shall hereafter be and read as follows:
§§ 95.084 through 95.094: Reserved.
11. Section 95.095, entitled “Drinking Cups,” and Section 96.096, entitled “Privy Vaults,” are
hereby deleted in their entirety and shall hereafter be and read as follows:
§§ 95.095 and 09.096: Reserved.
12. Sections 95.097 through 95.109 shall hereafter be and read as follows:
§§ 95.097 through 95.109: Reserved.
13. Section 95.111, entitled “Bills on Public and Private Property,” is hereby amended in part
and shall hereafter be and read as follows:
49
{00013429} 5
§ 95.111 BILLS ON PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PROPERTY
(A) No persons shall post, stick, stamp, tack, paint or otherwise, fix, or cause
the same to be done by any person, any notice, placard, billcard, poster,
advertisement or other device calculated to attract the attention of the public, to
or upon any sidewalk, crosswalk, curb or curbstone, flag stone or any other
portion or part of any public way, lamp post, electric light, telegraph, telephone
pole, hydrant, shade tree or tree-box or upon the piers, columns, trusses, girders,
railings, gates or other parts of any public bridge or viaduct, or upon any pole box
or fixture of the fire alarm system, except such as may be required or permitted
by laws of the state and the ordinances of the city.
(B) (1) No person shall post, stick, stamp, tack, paint or otherwise fix, or
cause the same to be done by another person, any notice, placard, bill, handbill,
sign, poster, card advertisement or other device calculated to attract the attention
of the public, upon any building or part thereof or window, without first obtaining
the consent of the owner, lessee or occupant of such premises or structure.
(2) Any such bills shall only be posted, stuck, stamped, tacked, painted or
otherwise fixed between the hours of sunup and sundown.
14. Section 95.112, entitled “Medical Advertisements,” is hereby amended in part as to its
title, and shall hereafter be and read as follows:
§ 95.112 MEDICAL ADVERTISEMENTS SAMPLES OR MERCHANDISE
It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation by himself or herself, or
his, her or its agents or servants to distribute, cast, throw or place, or cause to
distribute, cast, throw or place, in, upon or along any of the streets, alleys or
public places of the city, or upon the premises or yards of private residences
therein, or within any dwelling or building in the city any samples or merchandise
or medicinal preparations for the purpose or with the intent of advertising or
making known in a general promiscuous manner any business, occupation,
proposition, medical treatment, medicine, or any other article whatsoever.
15. Sections 95.113 through 95.124 shall hereafter be and read as follows:
§§ 95.113 through 95.124: Reserved.
16. Section 95.131, entitled “Prohibiting Distribution of Handbills Where Properly Posted,” is
hereby amended in part and shall hereafter be and read as follows:
§ 95.131 PROHIBITING DISTRIBUTION OF HANDBILLS WHERE PROPERLY
POSTED
(A) Generally. No person shall throw, deposit or distribute any commercial or
noncommercial handbill, magazine, newspaper or other printed matter upon any
private premises if requested by anyone thereon not to do so, or if there is placed
on said premises a sign bearing the words: “No Trespassing,” “No Peddlers or
50
{00013429} 6
Agents,” “No Advertisements” or any similar notice indicating in any manner that
the occupants of said premises do not desire to be molested or have their right of
privacy disturbed or to have any such printed matter in or upon such inhabited
private premises. On properties with no such limitations, printed matter
must be so placed or deposited in a manner it as to secure to and prevent such
matter from being blown or drifted about such private premises, neighboring
properties, or sidewalks, streets or other public places.
(B) Exemptions. The provisions of this section shall not apply to the
distribution of regular mail by the United States Postal Service nor to home
delivery of newspapers as defined herein or other printed matter delivered
pursuant to the order, request or subscription of the owner or occupant of the
premises; provided, however, that all such matter shall be placed on private
property in such a manner as to prevent their being carried or deposited by wind,
rain or other natural elements upon any street, sidewalk or other public place or
upon private property.
17. Section 95.133, entitled “Posting Notices Prohibited,” is hereby amended in part and
shall hereafter be and read as follows:
§ 95.133 POSTING NOTICES PROHIBITED
No person shall post or fix to any lamp post, public utility pole or shade tree,
place in the ground within the public right-of-way, or affix to upon any public
structure or building any notice, poster or sign other paper or device calculated
to attract the attention of the public except as may be authorized or required by
law.
18. Section 95.145, entitled “Refuse and Waste on Occupied Private Property,” is hereby
amended in part and shall hereafter be and read as follows:
§ 95.145 REFUSE AND WASTE ON OCCUPIED PRIVATE PROPERTY
No person shall throw or deposit litter on any occupied or unoccupied private
property within the city whether or not owned by such person except that the
owner or person in control of the private property may maintain authorized
private receptacles for collection in such a manner that litter will be prevented
from being carried or deposited by the elements upon any street, sidewalk or
other public place or upon any private property.
19. Section 95.146, entitled “Maintenance of Property” is hereby amended in part and shall
hereafter be and read as follows:
§95.146 MAINTENANCE OF PROPERTY.
It is hereby declared a public nuisance for any person owning, leasing, occupying
or having charge or possession of any premises in this city to maintain such
51
{00013429} 7
premises in such manner that any of the following conditions are found to be
exist thereon:
(A) Buildings which are abandoned, boarded up or in part boarded up,
partially destroyed or left unreasonably in a state of partial construction;
(B) Unpainted buildings, buildings with extensive peeling
paint, causing dry rot, warping and termite infestation;
(C) Broken or missing windows constituting hazardous conditions and
inviting trespassers and malicious mischief;
(D) Overgrown vegetation or obnoxious vegetation including vegetation on
the public parkway immediately adjacent to private property:
* * *
(F) Trailers, campers, boats and other mobile equipment stored within the
front yard zoning setback applicable to the property for longer than 50thirty
days in front yard areas excluding driveways and causing depreciation of nearby
property values;
(G) Inoperative, abandoned, wrecked or dismantled vehicles stored longer on
the premises for longer than thirty days.and causing depreciation of nearby
property values, as provided by §§ 95.160 and 95.161 here following;
(H) Parking of any form of motor driven bike, scooter or vehicle on mud, grass
or any non-all weather surface is prohibited;
* * *
(L) Packing boxes and other debris stored in yards and visible from public
streets for longer than ten three days;
* * *
20. Section 95.175, entitled “Background,” is hereby deleted in its entirety and shall
hereafter be and read as follows:
§ 95.175: Reserved.
21. Sections 95.185 through 95.194 shall hereafter be and read as follows:
§§ 95.185 through 95.194: Reserved.
22. Section 95.195, entitled “Enforcements of §§ 95.110 Through 95.112, 95.125 Through
95.133, 95.145 Through 95.147, 95.160 and 95.161,” is hereby amended in part and shall
hereafter be and read as follows:
52
{00013429} 8
§ 95.195 ABATEMENT OF NUISANCES AND ENFORCEMENT. OF §§ 95.110
THROUGH 95.112, 95.125 THROUGH 95.133, 95.145 THROUGH 95.147,
95.160 AND 95.161.
(A) Abatement of Nuisances; Notice to remove.
(1) It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to permit
or maintain the existence of any nuisance on any property under his, her,
or its control, including, but not limited to, any nuisance specifically
recognized by this Chapter 95.
(2) The City Manager, Chief of Police, and Director of Community
Development, or their designees, are hereby authorized to abate any
nuisance existing in the city, whether such nuisance is one specifically
recognized by ordinance or not.
(3) The City Manager, or his or her designee, is hereby authorized
and empowered to notify the owner or occupant of any property within the city or
the agent of such owner or occupant to properly correct the nuisance located on
such owner’s property which is dangerous to public health, safety, welfare or
property value.
(2)(4) Such notice shall be effective by mailing the same by United
States certified mail, postage fully prepaid, or by personal delivery, addressed
to the owner, tenant or agent at their last known place of residence or by handing
to in person, or to the person to whom was sent the tax bill for general taxes
for the last preceding year on the property on which the nuisance is found.
(B) Action upon noncompliance.
(1) Upon failure or neglect or refusal of any owner, occupant or agent so
notified to properly correct the offense which is dangerous to the public health,
safety, welfare or property value within the time prescribed by the written
notice provided for in division (A) above, which time period shall be not
less than five days after delivery or mailing of such notice, ten days after
mailing of written notice provided for in division (A) above. the City Manager, or
his or her designee, is hereby authorized and empowered to effect the
correction of such nuisance as provided in this Section.
(2) The City Manager is hereby authorized and empowered to effect the
correction of such nuisance.
(C) Costs charged to owner.
(1) The city may provide for the removal of a nuisance from private property
when the owner of such property, after reasonable notice, refuses or neglects to
remove such nuisance, and may collect from such owner the reasonable cost
thereof, including direct administrative expenses and overhead costs for third-
party services, and any attorneys’ fees; amounts not paid within 30 days after
notice of the cost of abatement will also accrue interest at a rate of 12% unless
the City Manager or Manager’s designee authorizes a lessor one.
* * *
53
{00013429} 9
23. Section 95.999, entitled “Penalty,” is hereby amended in part and shall hereafter be and
read as follows:
§ 95.999 PENALTY.
(A) Any person violating any provision of this chapter, shall be fined in
accordance with the Fee Schedule adopted annually by the City Council or,
if no applicable fine or other for which no other penalty is provided therein or
otherwise specifically provided by this Chapter, shall be subject to the
penalty provisions of § 10.99 of this City Code. In addition, any cost of
collection of fines or other amounts due to the City may be assessed in
accordance with § 10.99(B) of this City Code.
(B) (1) Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys omits,
neglects or refuses to comply with §§ 95.060 through 95.066, or who resists
enforcement of any of the provisions of sections or any lawful order of the
Director of Building and Zoning in the enforcement thereof shall, upon conviction,
be fined not more than $750 for each offense.
(2)Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a
separate offense and shall be punishable as such hereunder.
(3) In addition, any cost of collection of fines or other amounts due to the
city under this division (B) may be assessed in accordance with § 10.99(B) of this
city code.
(C) (1) Whoever violates any of the provisions of §§ 95.002 and 95.110
through 95.112, 95.125 through 95.133, 95.145 through 95.147, 95.160, 95.161
and 95.195 shall be fined not less than $50 nor more than $750; and a separate
offense shall be deemed committed on each day during or on which such
nuisance exists.
(2) (a) Whoever suffers or permits a nuisance as specified in
§§ 95.002 and 95.110 through 95.112, 95.125 through 95.133, 95.145
through 95.147, 95.160, 95.161 and 95.195 to exist or continue upon such
property owned or occupied by him or her within the city shall be fined not less
than $50 nor more than $750 for each offense; provided that each and every day
that such nuisance is permitted to exist or is maintained by an owner or occupant
of premises shall be considered a separate offense.
(b) In addition to the foregoing fine, with respect to any chronic
nuisance property, whoever suffers or permits any nuisance as specified under
these section to exist or continue upon such chronic nuisance property in
violation of § 95.146(Q) shall be subject to a separate fine of not less than $200
no more than $750 for each offense; provided that each and every day that a
violation of § 95.146(Q) exists or continues shall be considered a separate
offense.
(3) (a) Any person who fails to dispose of an inoperable motor
vehicle or an abandoned motor vehicle under his or her control within the period
of time delineated in the notice served pursuant to § 95.161 herein shall be fined
not less than $50 nor more than $750 for each offense.
54
{00013429} 10
(b) Each day such failure continues shall constitute a separate
offense and shall be punishable as such hereunder.
(D)(4) The remedies herein provided shall not be deemed or considered
exclusive, and nothing herein contained shall be construed to restrict or limit the
city in taking or maintaining any other or additional remedy either in law or in
equity given it for the definition, declaration and abatement of nuisances.
(5) In addition, any cost of collection of fines or other amounts due to the
city under this division (C) may be assessed in accordance with § 10.99(B) of this
city code.
(D) Any person who violates any provision of §§ 95.175 through 95.184 shall be
fined not less than $50 nor more than $500 for each and every offense, provided
that each day a violation continues shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION THREE: Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
upon its passage, approval, and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
Passed this ____ day of _____, 2016
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Approved this _____ day of ____, 2016
Mayor
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
55
1
THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST
ORDINANCE NO. 2016-___
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 116 OF THE CITY CODE
RELATING TO PAWNBROKERS
WHEREAS, The City of Lake Forest is a home rule, special charter municipal
corporation; and
WHEREAS, from time to time it is appropriate to review, update, and modify the City
Code of Lake Forest (the “City Code”) to assure that it appropriately addresses new issues that
may arise; and
WHEREAS, at the direction of the City Council, the City Staff, City Attorney, and City
Council Liaison (the “Panel”) reviewed Chapter 116 of the City Code; and
WHEREAS, the Panel determined and recommended that making certain changes to
Chapter 116 will promote a clearer understanding of the Code and thereby would serve the best
interests of the City and its residents; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council, having considered the recommendation of the
Panel, have determined that adopting this Ordinance and amending Chapter 116 of the City
Code as hereinafter set forth, will be in the best interests of the City and its residents;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, COUNTY OF LAKE, STATE OF ILLINOIS, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION ONE: Recitals. The foregoing recitals are hereby adopted by this
reference as the findings of the City Council and are hereby incorporated into this Section as if
fully set forth.
SECTION TWO: Amendment to Chapter 116. Chapter 116, entitled
“Pawnbrokers,” of Title XI, entitled “Business Regulations,” of the City Code is hereby amended
as follows:
56
2
1. Section 116.01, entitled “License Required,” is hereby amended in part and shall
hereafter be and read as follows:
§116.01 LICENSE REQUIRED.
(A) No person, firm or corporation shall conduct or operate the business of
pawnbroker: (i) without having first been licensed therefor as is herein provided;
or (ii) in violation of any of the provisions herein contained.
(B) Any pawnbroker’s license shall be for a specified premises as identified
on the license, and any pawnbroker operating from more than one location
in the City shall obtain a license for each such location. Any pawnbroker’s
license may be revoked by the Mayor for any violation of any provision of this
chapter.
2. Section 116.02, entitled “Application; Investigation,” is hereby amended in part
and shall hereafter be and read as follows:
§ 116.02 APPLICATION; INVESTIGATION.
(A) Applications for pawnbrokers’ licenses shall be made to the City Clerk,
and shall state thereon the name of the applicant, the place of business and the
number of employees intended to be engaged.
(B) The application shall include:
1. Application generally. Applications for local pawn broker
licenses shall be made to the Clerk on a form prescribed by the Clerk; shall
be in writing; shall be signed by the applicant if an individual, or by one of
the partners on behalf of all partners if a partnership, by a member or
manager of a limited liability company, or by a duly authorized agent if a
corporation; and shall be verified by an oath or affidavit. Each application
shall specifically identify the applicant and the licensed premises to which
a local Pawn broker license would be issued, and the filing of an
application shall authorize the Local Chief of Police or agents to conduct
all necessary or appropriate background checks of the applicant and its
agents, owners and representatives.
2. Background information. Each application shall include the
following background information:
a. The name, age, address and Social Security number of
the applicant; in the case of a partnership, all partners and also of the
persons entitled to share in the profits thereof; in the case of a corporation
or club, the names and addresses of the officers and directors and every
person owning or controlling more than 5% of the voting shares of stock or
the ownership interest; in the case of a limited liability company, all
members and managers;
57
3
b. In the case of an individual, the citizenship and place
of birth of the applicant and, if a naturalized citizen, the time and place of
his or her naturalization. In the case of a corporation, the date and place of
incorporation and the objects for which it was formed and proof that it is a
corporation in good standing and authorized to conduct business in the
state;
c. The character of business of the applicant;
d. The length of time that the applicant has been in the
business of the character specified in response to division (B)(2)(c) above;
e. The amount of goods, wares and merchandise on
hand at the time application is made;
f. The location and description of the premises for which
a local pawn broker license is sought and the specific name of the
business that is to be operated under such local pawn broker license;
g. The names of each governmental body from which the
applicant (and all other persons identified in division (B)(2)(a) above) has
received a Pawn broker license within ten years immediately prior to the
date of the present application; and
h. A telephone number or numbers at which the licensee
or the manager can be contacted 24 hours per day.
3. Statements required.
a. For any license or renewal of a license, the applicant
shall be required to make statements regarding such applicant and all
persons to be identified pursuant to division (B)(2)(a) above. If the
applicant is an individual, that individual shall subscribe to all of the
statements set out below. If the applicant is a partnership, each partner
shall subscribe to all of the statements set out below; provided, however,
that if the applicant is organized as a limited partnership, then the
statement concerning active involvement provided in division (B)(3)(b)(XVI)
below shall be required only of all general partners. If the applicant is a
corporation, each director and officer thereof and every person owning or
controlling more than 5% of the voting shares or the ownership interest of
such corporation shall subscribe to all of the statements set out below. If
the applicant is a limited liability company, each member and manager
shall subscribe to all of the statements set out below.
b. If the business for which a local Pawn Brokers license
is sought will be managed by a manager or agent, every such manager or
agent shall subscribe to all of the statements set out below. The
submission of false information in regarding the following statements shall
be grounds for denial, revocation or non-renewal of a pawn broker license:
58
4
I. A statement as to whether or not the applicant
has a current, valid state pawn broker license for the premises covered by
the application (with a copy of such State license included as part of the
application);
II. A statement as to whether or not the applicant
has ever been convicted of a felony under any federal or state law;
III. A statement as to whether or not the applicant
has ever been convicted of a violation of any federal or state law or local
ordinance concerning fraud or has ever forfeited his or her bond to appear
in court to answer charges for any such violation;
IV. A statement as to whether the applicant has
ever been convicted of a gambling offense as proscribed by any state or
federal law or regulation or has ever forfeited his or her bond to appear in
court to answer charges for any such violation;
V. A statement whether the applicant has made
similar application for a similar license for a premises other than described
in the application, and the disposition of such application;
VI. A statement as to whether or not the applicant
has had revoked any pawn broker license issued under state or federal law
or under the ordinances of any municipality within ten years immediately
prior to the date of the present application;
VII. A statement as to whether or not the applicant
has had suspended more than once any pawn broker license issued under
state or federal law or under the ordinances of any municipality within one
year immediately prior to the present application;
VIII. A statement as to whether or not the applicant
is a city employee or a law enforcing official of the city or any other
government or government agency;
IX. A statement as to whether or not the applicant
has been issued a federal gaming device stamp or a federal wagering
stamp for the current tax period;
X. A statement as to whether or not a federal
gaming device stamp has been issued for the current taxable year with
respect to the premises for which the local Pawn license is sought;
XI. A statement as to whether or not the premises
for which a local Pawn license is sought comprises a store or other place
of business where the majority of customers are under the age of 21 years
or where the principal business transacted consists of the sale of school
books, school supplies, food, lunches or drinks for such customers;
59
5
XII. A statement as to whether or not the premises
for which a license is sought is within 100 feet of any church building used
for worship or educational purposes, school (other than an institution of
higher learning), hospital, senior citizen housing, daycare center, nursing
or personal care facility or any military or naval station;
XIII. A statement as to whether or not the applicant
is a permanent resident of the city; or for any applicant that is partnership,
all of the general partners of the partnership are residents of the city;
XIV. A statement as to whether or not the applicant
beneficially owns the premises for which a license is sought or has a lease
thereon for the full period for which the license is to be issued;
XV. A statement as to whether or not the applicant
is the beneficial owner of the business to be licensed;
XVI. A statement as to whether or not the applicant
will be personally and actively involved in the operation of the business to
be licensed;
XVII. A statement as to whether or not the business
is or will be managed by a manager or agent;
XVIII. A statement as to the nature of the business
and the amount of anticipated pawn sales as a percentage of gross annual
sales of the business;
XIX. A statement that the applicant is not
disqualified from receiving a license by reason of any matter or item
contained in the laws of the state, this chapter or any other code or
ordinance of the city;
XX. A statement that the applicant will not violate
any federal or state laws, this chapter or any other code or ordinance of the
city in the conduct of the applicant’s business;
XXI. If the applicant is a foreign corporation, a
statement as to whether or not it is qualified under the State Business
Corporations Act of 1983, 805 ILCS 5/1.01 et seq., to transact business in
the state;
XXII. If the business to be operated pursuant to the
local Pawn license is operating under an assumed name, a statement that
the applicant has complied with the state assumed business name act and
other applicable laws; and
XXIII. Such other statements or information as may
be necessary to demonstrate that the applicant, the applicant’s business
and the premises from which such business will be conducted satisfy all
60
6
conditions and requirements applicable to the local Pawn license being
sought.
(B)(C) The Chief of Police or any other officer designated by the Mayor or by
the City Council shall investigate each applicant for such license, and shall report
back whether or not such applicant is a person of good character; no license
shall be issued to any but a person of good character, nor shall such license be
issued to a person who has been convicted of the offense of receiving stolen
goods or of burglary or robbery.
(D) Examination of applicant. At any time during the pendency of an
application, the Chief of Police shall have the right to compel the applicant
to submit to any examination and to produce any books and records which,
in the judgment of the Chief of Police, are material to the determination of
whether the applicant and the applicant’s business are qualified to receive
a local Pawn license or whether the premises sought to be licensed is
suitable for such purposes. The Chief of Police shall also have the right to
require the applicant to answer any charges made in any objection to the
issuance of the license. The failure of any applicant to appear at the time
and place fixed by the Chief of Police for his or her examination or to
produce books and records requested, unless for good cause shown, shall
be deemed to be admission that the applicant is not qualified to receive a
local pawn broker license and a request to withdraw the application.
(E) Investigation and disclosure of information contained in application;
waiver of claims. By applying for, or providing information in support of an
application for, a local pawn broker license, every person so applying or
providing information thereby:
1. Authorizes any person to disclose, and the city to investigate, all
information pertaining to such application;
2. Waives any and all claims against the city; and
3. Agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the city and its elected and
appointed officials, officers, boards, Chief of Polices, attorneys,
employees, agents and representatives from any and all claims resulting
from, or arising out of, or alleged to result from or arise out of the
processing of such application and any investigation related thereto. Each
such person shall consent to and sign any written authorization, waiver
and indemnification agreement as the city may require in connection with
the processing of such application and any investigation related thereto,
but no such separate authorization, waiver, or indemnification shall be
required to make effective the terms of this division.
(F) Denial or issuance of license. If after review of an application and all
relevant facts, the Chief of Police determines that the application should be
denied, the Chief of Police shall notify the applicant within a reasonable
time, in writing, stating the reasons for the denial, but otherwise shall issue
the local pawn license as soon as all fees required by this chapter have
been paid and all other requirements of this chapter have been satisfied.
61
7
(G) Supplemental information following issuance. Any change in
information provided on, or in connection with, any application for a Pawn
license that does or might affect the right of any licensee to continue to
hold a local pawn license shall be reported in writing to the Chief of Police
within ten days after the change. All such changes shall be subject to
review and approval by the Chief of Police in the same manner as the
original application. When any such change affects the ownership of any
partnership licensee or any director, officer, manager or person owning or
controlling more than 5% of the shares of any corporate licensee, all such
persons that have not previously submitted information pursuant to the
application process shall, within ten days after such change, submit all
information required of a new applicant.
(H) Waiver of Application Requirements. The City Manager may, in
consultation with the Chief of Police, waive some or all of the license
application requirements set forth in this Chapter provided that the City
Manager determines that such waived portion of the application
requirements will not impact the public health, safety, or welfare. Grounds
for such waiver may include without limitation evidence of a pawn license
having been previously approved or substantial identity between a current
pawn license holder and an applicant for another pawn license.
3. Section 116.04, entitled “Minors,” is hereby amended in part and shall hereafter
be and read as follows:
§ 116.04 MINORS.
(A) No pawnbroker’s license shall be issued to any person who is not 21
years of age or over; and no pawnbroker shall employ a person of less than 21
years of age to assist him or her in his or her business.
(B) No pawnbroker shall have any business dealings as pawnbroker with any
person less than 21 years of age, except with the written consent of the parent or
guardian of the minor to the particular transaction.
4. Section 116.16, entitled “Weapons,” is hereby amended in part and shall
hereafter be and read as follows:
§ 116.16 WEAPONS.
No pawnbroker shall receive, as a pledge, or purchase any revolver, pistol,
blackjack or sawed off shotgun firearm.
5. A new Section 116.18, entitled “Zoning Compliance,” is hereby enacted and shall
hereafter be and read as follows:
62
8
§ 116.18 ZONING COMPLIANCE.
Any business to be operated pursuant to the local Pawn license must
obtain a certificate of zoning compliance as a condition to the issuance of
any license under this Chapter and in connection with any change of use,
expansion of uses on a site, or the issuance of any building permits.
SECTION THREE: Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
upon its passage, approval, and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
Passed this ____ day of _____, 2016
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Approved this _____ day of ____, 2016
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________
City Clerk
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88