CITY COUNCIL 2014/07/07 Agenda
THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
July 7, 2014, 6:30 p.m.
City Hall Council Chambers
Honorable Mayor, Donald Schoenheider
Catherine Waldeck, Alderman First Ward Stanford Tack, Alderman Third Ward
Prudence R. Beidler, Alderman First Ward Jack Reisenberg, Alderman Third Ward
David Moore, Alderman Second Ward Michael Adelman, Alderman Fourth Ward
George Pandaleon, Alderman Second Ward Michelle Moreno, Alderman Fourth Ward
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 6:30 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS
1. COMMENTS BY MAYOR 6:30 p.m.
A. 2014-2015 New Board and Commission Appointments/Reappointments
PUBLIC SERVICE AWARD COMMITTEE
NAME OF MEMBER APPOINT
Jim Cowhey Appoint for 2 Year Term
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve the Mayors Appointment
2. COMMENTS BY CITY MANAGER 6:35p.m.
3. COMMENTS BY COUNCIL MEMBERS 6:35 p.m.
A. Finance Committee
1. Consideration of the Annual Appropriation Ordinance for
FY2015 and Approval of Rollovers (First Reading)
PRESENTED BY: ELIZABETH HOLLEB, FINANCE DIRECTOR (847) 810-3612
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Staff requests approving the first reading of the
ordinance and the rollovers.
1
July 7, 2014 City Council Agenda
PROJECT REVIEW/RECOMMENDATIONS:
Reviewed Date Comments
City Council May 5, 2014 Adoption of FY15 Comprehensive
Plan
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: While the annual municipal budget represents the
City’s financial “plan” for expenditures over the course of the fiscal year, the
annual Appropriation Ordinance is the formal legal mechanism by which the City
Council authorizes the actual expenditures of funds budgeted in the annual
budget. It appropriates specific sums of money by object and purpose of
expenditures. State statutes require the passage of an Appropriation Ordinance
which must be filed with the County Clerk by the end of July.
The Appropriation Ordinance includes the Library, which was not included in the
budget approved at the May 5, 2014 City Council meeting. The Library expenses
are approved by the Library Board. The Debt Service payments were included in
the budget approved at the May 5, 2014 City Council meeting, but are excluded
from the Appropriation Ordinance. The ordinances approving the debt issues
authorize these annual expenditures.
The Appropriation Ordinance provides for a 10% “contingency” in the
expenditures in an amount above those actually budgeted. Each separate fund
includes an item labeled “contingency” with an appropriate sum equivalent up to
10% of the total funds budgeted. This practice has been followed for the past
thirty years and has worked very efficiently, while still providing for complete City
Council control over budgeted expenditures. Importantly, the City Council and
City staff follows the adopted budget as its spending guideline, not the
Appropriation Ordinance.
Without the contingency, the City Council would have to pass further
modifications to the Appropriation Ordinance to cover any unforeseen
expenditures exceeding the budget.
In addition, in order to provide more accurate and efficient accounting and
budgeting of City funds, an annual rollover of funds is required. This eliminates both
under and over budgeting of funds in the new fiscal year and is a widely used
standard practice for most municipal governments. The items on the attached
rollover list (page 14) consist of projects that were appropriated in FY2014 and will
not be completed until FY2015.
School District 67 does not recognize the Appropriation Ordinance in its budgeting
or auditing standards. However, due to the fact it is a special charter district, its
budget must be included in our Appropriation Ordinance. School District 67
numbers are estimates and are subject to changes.
BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT:
2
July 7, 2014 City Council Agenda
Summary of the Amounts Appropriated from the Several Funds
The City of Lake Forest Fund Rollover Budget Total Appropriation
General $ 93,246 $ 31,902,603 $ 31,995,849 $ 35,195,434
Lake Forest Hospital Project 0 60,000 60,000 66,000
Park and Public Land 45,845 190,000 235,845 259,430
Motor Fuel Tax 55,366 1,820,000 1,875,366 2,062,903
Emergency Telephone 0 282,581 282,581 310,839
Senior Resources Commission 0 599,196 599,196 659,116
Parks and Recreation Funds 23,491 9,091,226 9,114,717 10,026,189
Special Recreation 33,681 433,963 467,644 514,408
Cemetery Commission 38,680 969,705 1,008,385 1,109,224
Public Library 0 3,931,322 3,931,322 4,324,454
Foreign Fire Insurance 0 200,000 200,000 220,000
Drug Asset Forfeiture 0 30,000 30,000 33,000
Alcohol Asset Forfeiture 0 65,000 65,000 71,500
Housing Trust 50,000 250,000 300,000 330,000
Capital Improvements 387,087 8,502,776 8,889,863 9,778,849
Rt. 60 Bridge 0 1,032,000 1,032,000 1,135,200
Rt. 60 Intersection 0 418,000 418,000 459,800
Water and Sewer 42,372 8,528,121 8,570,493 9,427,542
Water and Sewer Capital 96,902 2,655,000 2,751,902 3,027,092
Deerpath Golf Course 0 1,603,062 1,603,062 1,763,368
Fleet 0 1,919,936 1,919,936 2,111,930
Liability Insurance 0 1,210,853 1,210,853 1,331,938
Self Insurance 0 5,140,706 5,140,706 5,654,777
Firefighters’ Pension 0 1,873,760 1,873,760 2,061,136
Police Pension 0 2,232,027 2,232,027 2,455,230
Sub-total $ 866,670 $ 84,941,837 $ 85,808,507 $ 94,389,358
School District 67 (not
available until second
reading)
Educational n/a $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Operations, Building and
Maintenance
n/a 0 0 0
Transportation n/a 0 0 0
IMRF/Social Security n/a 0 0 0
Capital Projects n/a 0 0 0
Sub-total $ 0 0 0
Grand Total $ 84,941,837 $ 85,808,507 $ 94,389,358
COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of the first reading of the ordinance (page 15) and the
rollovers. A copy of the ordinance is available for review by the public in the City Clerk’s
office. A public hearing will be conducted on July 21, 2014 in conjunction with second
reading of the ordinance.
3
July 7, 2014 City Council Agenda
4. OPPORTUNITY FOR CITIZENS TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL ON NON-AGENDA
ITEMS
5. ITEMS FOR OMNIBUS VOTE CONSIDERATION 6:45 p.m.
1. Approval of the June 16, 2014 City Council meeting Minutes
A copy of the minutes begins on page 27.
2. Check register for period May 24-June 27, 2014
Fund Invoice Payroll Total
General 447,761 1,132,141 1,579,902
Water & Sewer 83,089 114,035 197,124
Parks & Recreation 201,435 320,952 522,386
Capital Improvements 707,781 0 707,781
Motor Fuel Tax 0 0 0
Cemetery 16,085 18,706 34,791
Senior Resources 20,599 21,076 41,675
Deerpath Golf Course 160,486 48,364 208,849
Fleet 117,157 38,787 155,944
Debt Funds 939,266 0 939,266
Housing Trust 5,000 0 5,000
Park & Public Land 41,263 0 41,263
All other Funds 465,618 138,377 603,996
$ 3,205,540 $ 1,832,438 $ 5,037,978
3. Approval of Resolution Authorizing Temporary Overflow Beach Parking
During Forest Park Construction
STAFF CONTACT: Mary Van Arsdale, Director, 810-3918
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Staff requests approval of a Resolution (page 34)
authorizing temporary parking options on overflow beach days on an as-needed basis, in
the areas shown on Exhibit A (page 33). The Resolution would also direct Public Safety
personnel to suspend any Code Enforcement actions related to parking that is consistent
with this Resolution.
PROJECT REVIEW/RECOMMENDATIONS:
Reviewed Date Comments
Parks and Recreation, Police,
Community Development,
Office of City Manager
06/16/14 Collaborative Support of Resolution
4
July 7, 2014 City Council Agenda
First Presbyterian Church 06/19/14 Supportive of Request. Coordination
process in place.
Lake Forest College 05/21/14
06/23/14
Supportive of Request. Coordination
process in place.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: With the Forest Park Project Improvements underway,
parking in and around Forest Park will be reduced and may not meet the demand for
parking on peak activity/weather days at the beach and boat basin. The construction
phasing of work for this summer and fall 2014 results in the loss of the Upper South Parking
Lot, or approximately 20 spaces. In an effort to be proactive with ways to accommodate
parking, staff evaluated the options and identified two parking locations to help mitigate
the challenges on overflow days. The options are shown in Exhibit A, page 33, and will be
located on the Lake Forest College Campus and one along the south side of Deerpath
between Sheridan and Washington Roads. Currently, City ordinances and Lake Forest
College Special Use Permits restrict The City from utilizing these parking options for this
purpose without City Council approval.
An operations plan to address the items identified in the Resolution has been developed
in conjunction with the appropriate staff from the First Presbyterian Church, Lake Forest
College, Police Department and Parks and Recreation Department. Parking must be
filled at the Lower North and Lower South parking lots before City staff activates the
overflow parking option. Temporary signage will be used and beach parking staff will be
placed at the overflow parking areas to monitor and communicate between all of the
parking lots. Neighbors adjacent to these parking areas will be notified upon City Council
approval.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Resolution Authorizing Temporary Overflow Beach Parking
During Forest Park Construction.
4. Recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Board for approval of
Everett Park Tot Lot Playground Project as Included in the FY15 Capital Plan
STAFF CONTACT: Chuck Myers, Superintendent of Parks & Forestry (810-3565)
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: The Parks and Recreation Board and Staff are seeking
approval to purchase playground equipment and installation materials for the Everett
Park Tot Lot Playground Capital Project.
PROJECT REVIEW/RECOMMENDATIONS:
Reviewed Date Comments
Parks and Recreation Board 6/17/14 Recommend Approval of NuToys contract
Parks and Recreation Board 5/20/14 First Review of Design/Color Selection
City Recreation and Park Staff April-May
2014 Design Development Phase
5
July 7, 2014 City Council Agenda
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Everett Tot Lot playground was originally built in 1991,
and designed for children 2-5 years of age, it is the smaller of the two playgrounds and is
located on the west side of the park. A larger elementary-age playground is located on
the east side and is used exclusively by Everett School and Recreation Department’s
preschool program on a daily basis. The current playground has reached the end of its
useful life and consists of rotting timber retaining walls, fibar wood chip surface, sandbox
and metal and plastic playground equipment in poor condition. The playground is
heavily utilized by the neighborhood and Lake Forest families using the soccer and
baseball game fields. Replacement is needed to provide a safe and modern play
structure for children.
The City vetted several playground manufacturers in 2009 and selected Landscape
Structure equipment, solely distributed by NuToys, as the preferred line of playground
equipment. Since that time, the City has installed playgrounds at Deerpath Park,
Waveland and Townline Parks with this preferred vendor. This has resulted in a high
quality, consistent appearance of playgrounds in our parks and resident feedback has
been extremely positive. NuToys has worked with staff to design a playground that would
be well suited in scale, variety and according to budget for the Everett Park property.
The proposed playground is designed with play elements that appropriately stimulate
and encourage motor and cognitive play for young children, are in full compliance with
current ADA standards, and has poured-in-place surfacing which reduces the weekly
and annual maintenance needs.
Staff followed the same design and procurement process as used for the last three
playground projects by working through HGACBuy, a National Procurement Service,
which competitively bids playground equipment to offer time and cost savings (6%
discount on equipment) for Governmental Entities. This bidding process is fully compliant
with the City of Lake Forest Government Joint Purchasing Policy and State of Illinois
procurement statutes. In addition, we do not have to bid the demolition or installation
costs as that we complete this in-house with our certified parks crew personnel.
Upon approval by City Council, the tentative schedule for this project will be the
purchase of all equipment in July 2014, with demolition and pre-construction beginning in
early August, and equipment installation starting later that month. The tentative
completion date for this project will be September 26th.
BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT:
The total cost for this project; including equipment, site work and Poured-in-Place rubber
surfacing is $100,000. Funding for the Everett Park Tot Lot Playground Project is budgeted
in the FY’15 CIP.
Our estimated break down of costs is as follows:
Expense Amount
Playground Equipment $44,386
Concrete Curbing/Sidewalk Extension/Stone $23,423
6
July 7, 2014 City Council Agenda
Poured-in-Place Rubber Surfacing $32,191
Total Expense: $100,000
FY ’15 Funding
Source Amount Budgeted Amount Requested Budgeted?
Y/N
Park and
Recreation Fund $100,000 $92,569.12 Y
Special Recreation
Fund $10,000 $7,430.88 Y
COUNCIL ACTION: The Parks & Recreation Board and Staff recommend waiving a City
bid process by using the national joint governmental HGACBuy procurement bid
program and awarding a contract to NuToys Leisure Products, in an amount not to
exceed $100,000 for the purchase of playground equipment, surfacing and concrete
installation.
5. Approval Directing Staff to Prepare a Contract with Vermont Systems, Inc. to
Purchase Parks and Recreation Software
STAFF CONTACT: Mary Van Arsdale, Director of Parks and Recreation (847-810-3918) and
Elizabeth Holleb, Director of Finance/IT (847-810-3612)
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: The Parks and Recreation Board and Staff requests
approval that authorizes City staff and the City Attorney to prepare a contract with
Vermont Systems, Inc. (VSI) for replacement of the Parks and Recreation Department
software system.
PROJECT REVIEW/RECOMMENDATIONS:
Reviewed Date Comments
Parks and Recreation Board 11/19/13 Plante Moran Consulting Recommendation
City Council 12/2/13 Awarded Plante Moran Consultant Contract
City Staff 01/2014 Participated in Needs Assessment
Parks and Recreation &
Finance/IT Staff 01-06/2014 Developed Software Specifications,
Conducted RFP and Vendor Diligence
City Manager 2/5/14 Needs Assessment Report & Authorization to
Proceed with Software Vendor RFP
Parks and Recreation Board 06/17/14 Recommended preparation of contract with
Vermont Systems, Inc.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The City Parks and Recreation department has utilized
Active Network Class software since 1998. The current version of this software is being
7
July 7, 2014 City Council Agenda
phased out by 2016 and will no longer be supported. As a result, the Parks and
Recreation Department, in conjunction with the Finance/IT Department, began to
investigate a right- sized, comprehensive software solution to meet operational business
needs. In December 2013, City Council authorized a contract totaling $40,325 with Plante
Moran, a software consulting firm, to support staff and provide software project
management expertise throughout all phases except implementation.
Plante Moran has since guided staff through a very detailed and extensive six-month
process using their assessment methodology and set of related scoring tools intended to
mitigate City risk while incorporating City of Lake Forest needs (see Plante Moran’s Project
Memorandum page 37). Since January 2014 staff with Plante Moran has completed four
very distinct phases of work that included:
• Phase 0-Project Management: Completed December 2013.
• Phase 1-Needs Assessment: Completed January 2014.
• Phase 2- RFP Vendor Preparation and Delivery: Completed March 2014.
• Phase 3-Software Vendor Response Analysis & Selection: Completed June 2014.
• Phase 4-Statement of Work Development and Contract Negotiations: Anticipate
completion in September 2014.
CURRENT PROJECT MILESTONE:
The City issued a Request for Proposal to potential recreation software vendors on March
7, 2014. Staff received 3 comprehensive proposals and 1 best of breed solution for a total
of four (4) proposals. The three comprehensive vendors (Active Network, eTrak-Plus and
Vermont Systems, Inc.) were deemed to satisfy the minimum criteria that allowed the City
to proceed with further extensive evaluation. However, Volgistics, being a best-of-breed
solution focused solely on volunteer management, did not allow for a comprehensive
comparative analysis with the other complete systems but was evaluated as a
specialized module. Proposal costs were received from the vendors as follows:
Vendors Proposal Results-
One Time & Year One Costs
Cumulative Costs over
10 Year Period
Active Network (VH) $182,904 $1,179,578
eTrak-Plus (VH) $136,654 $289,041
Vermont Systems (VH) $162,200 $425,576
Vermont Systems (OP) $151,700 $305,205
Volgistics (Best of Breed VH) $1,176 $13,482
VH=vendor hosted solution, OP=on premise hosted solution
As the chart above indicates, the four RFP vendors provided one-time and on-going
prices that varied widely due to software capabilities, fee structures and suggested
modification scope. A full financial analysis of the totals above included a one-time cost
summary, on-going cost summary, 10-year cost summary, modular cost summary, data
conversion summary, interface summary and service hours summary (see Project
Executive Summary page 40). As a result, vendors were provided an opportunity to clarify
information in their proposals via written responses to address remaining City questions.
Two vendors, eTrak-Plus and Vermont Systems, were chosen to provide full day
demonstrations of their software solution. Staff did not select Active Network due to our
familiarity as our current vendor. Full day demonstrations, with approximately 18 City staff
in attendance, were held in May 2014.
8
July 7, 2014 City Council Agenda
Following each of the vendor demonstrations, the Selection Committee met to debrief
and discuss strengths and weaknesses of the proposed solution. The Selection Committee
scored the vendors and unanimously chose to complete further diligence with Vermont
Systems, Inc. only by conducting in-depth reference interviews with five current clients
using similar modules. The City also conducted an additional reference check to verify
the vendor’s ability to interface with the City’s current SunGard HTE financial system. We
will further explore the vendor hosted option as part of our contract negotiations.
CONCLUSIONS: Through the comprehensive diligence review, staff identified the strengths
and pitfalls of each proposed vendor. A specific concern of the lowest comprehensive
bidder, eTrak-Plus, was their inability to meet core software specifications without
significant customization (21% must be customized), their weak financial reporting
capabilities, and overall preparation and follow up throughout the RFP process. Active
Network currently falls short of meeting our business needs and their next version was
determined to be cost prohibitive over a 10-year period. Vermont Systems, Inc. provided
the software that most ideally met City needs and specifications, was extremely
professional to work with, has a satisfied client base and fits the City’s annual funding
capabilities. The Selection Committee and Parks and Recreation Board unanimously
concluded that Vermont Systems offered the solution that would most satisfy the City’s
software needs.
At this phase of the project, City staff is seeking authorization to move forward into a
development of the Statement of Work and Contract Negotiations with our preferred
vendor, Vermont Systems, Inc. During this next phase, the City will work with the vendor to
confirm any items that may alter the final costs and ensure that the specific scope of
software, hardware, immediate and on-going services is clearly documented. In
addition, implementation timing and other details such as terms and conditions must be
agreed to in order to finalize a contract. The contract, with the final and full project costs
identified, and which has been reviewed by the City’s attorney, will come back to City
Council for approval by September 2014.
BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT: City staff is not seeking any financial approval at this phase;
rather we are seeking authorization to move forward into contract negotiation based
upon the six months of research, request for proposal process and diligence that has
occurred resulting in the selection of Vermont Systems, Inc. as the preferred software firm.
This project was identified as a FY15 Capital project funded via the Recreation Fund and
the process to date complies fully with the Project Plan and City’s purchasing policies.
Below is an estimated summary of Project budget:
FY2015 Funding Source Amount
Budgeted
Amount
Requested
Budgeted?
Y/N
Fund 220 Parks & Recreation
220-8065-451-75-01 $290,000
None at this
phase of
project
Y
9
July 7, 2014 City Council Agenda
COUNCIL ACTION: authorize City staff and City Attorney to prepare a contract with
Vermont Systems, Inc. (VSI) for replacement of the Parks and Recreation Department
software system and seek City Council approval of said contract and costs by
September 2014.
6. Ratify a Letter of Understanding between the City of Lake Forest and the
Village of Glenview in which the Village of Glenview agrees to provide
qualified dispatching personnel to staff the Lake Forest Dispatch Center
throughout the Dispatch Consolidation transitional period.
STAFF CONTACT: JAMES HELD, CHIEF OF POLICE (847) 810-3802
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Staff is requesting City Council Ratify a Letter of
Understanding between the City of Lake Forest and the Village of Glenview in the
transitional period until Glenview fully incorporates the Consolidated Dispatching services.
A copy of the Letter of Understanding can be found on page 45.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Due to the Dispatch Consolidation, contingency plans were
put in place to have Glenview dispatch employees fill in if/when City dispatchers left the
City, subsequently, four Lake Forest dispatchers have left the employ of the City and the
City of Lake Forest faced the hardship of filling openings with forced overtime
assignments by the remaining personnel. Due to the fact that the cumulative cost of
utilizing Glenview employees will exceed the City Managers spending authority, the City
Council needs to ratify the attached letter of understanding. The letter of understanding
with Glenview provides one or more qualified dispatchers and will achieve three main
goals: first, reducing the amount of overtime hours and salary that currently burdens the
City of Lake Forest; secondly, providing Lake Forest personnel a respite from the strenuous
workload with very limited time off; and thirdly, allowing the Glenview dispatch personnel
an opportunity to train on the Lake Forest system and educate themselves on the
expectations of the residents and geography of our jurisdiction.
BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal agreement for the Letter of Understanding is as
follows:
Personnel Hourly Rate Overtime Rate
Glenview Supervisor $70.00 $83.25
Glenview Dispatcher $45.00 $47.59
By comparison, the City is currently paying existing dispatchers an average rate of $50.19
per hour to provide coverage. These fees will remain consistent throughout the
transitional period until Glenview fully incorporates the Consolidated Dispatching. The
City of Lake Forest will be billed by Glenview at a rate that affords a savings of
approximately $2600.00 per month through the transitional period.
COUNCIL ACTION: Ratify the Letter of Understanding between The City of Lake Forest
and the Village of Glenview
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve the SIX (6) Omnibus items as presented.
10
July 7, 2014 City Council Agenda
6. ORDINANCES
7. NEW BUSINESS 7:00p.m.
1. Consideration of a Recommendation from the Plan Commission Pertaining
to Proposed Amendments to Approvals Previously Granted to the Amberley
Woods Development to Allow a Retail Center, the Conway Market, on 8.5
Acres Located at the Southeast Corner of Route 60 and Saunders Road.
(Approval of a Motion Providing Direction.)
Presented by: Catherine Czerniak, Director of Community Development (810-3504) and
Victor Filippini, City Attorney
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: The Council is asked to consider a recommendation
from the Plan Commission relating to a proposed retail center, the Conway Market, on
Route 60. The retail center is proposed in place of the office and ancillary
retail/restaurant uses previously approved for this 8.5 acre site as part of the Amberley
Woods mixed use development.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: In November, 2013, the Plan Commission heard an
informational presentation on the proposed retail center. In February, 2014, the
Commission opened a public hearing on the matter and continued the hearing over the
course of three meetings. During the public hearing process, the Plan Commission heard
lengthy presentations and testimony from the petitioner, the petitioner’s consultants,
members of the public and City staff. On June 11, 2014, the Commission concluded its
review and forwarded a recommendation of conditional support for the project to the
City Council.
The Plan Commission acknowledged that the project as proposed requires exceptions to
prior approvals granted for this site, amendments to the plat of subdivision and variances
from some Code requirements. The Commission also acknowledged that the
development deviates in some ways from the Comprehensive Plan direction for the
Route 60 Corridor. However, the Commission stated support for the concept of retail and
restaurant uses at the proposed location and an interest in finding a way to make such a
project work. During deliberations, the Commission strived to balance the various
interests, points of view, what is needed to make a retail center successful, and the intent
of existing policies and requirements. Toward that end, the Commission developed a
series of recommendations for Council consideration. The recommendations are
focused around several key aspects of the site.
Use. As noted above, the Commission supported the concept of retail and
restaurant uses at this site from a land use perspective. The Commission’s
recommendation attempts to bring certainty, to the extent possible, that the
anchor tenant in the center will be Whole Foods or a grocery store offering
products and services of similar quality. The Commission also recommended
limiting the percent of the spaces that can be occupied by non-sales tax
producing businesses similar to limitations in the City’s other business districts.
Intensity of Development of the Site. The Commission’s recommendation
addresses setbacks, tree removal/replanting, parking lot layout and buffers
11
July 7, 2014 City Council Agenda
between the retail center and the adjacent existing and future residential
development to the east and south. These issues together direct how intensely the
site will be developed.
Drainage. The Commission heard testimony from engineers confirming that the
preliminary drainage plans and calculations meet applicable requirements. The
Commission also recognized that final drainage plans would require further review
and verification and asked that they be carefully scrutinized. The Commission
heard concerns from neighboring residents about drainage and in response
directed exploration early in the public hearing process, of alternative plans.
Traffic. The Commission supported the addition of a right in/right out access to the
retail center from Route 60 and the lengthening of the westbound left turn lane on
Route 60 to facilitate traffic to and from the retail center. The Commission’s
recommendations make provisions for the possibility that future improvements to
the intersection of Route 60, Saunders Road and Field Drive may be needed and
direct that costs proportionate to the traffic generated be by borne by the new
development. The Commission also responded to concerns about cut through
traffic on Amberley Court, the road to the south of the development, and
included in its recommendation a provision to reserve land for a cul-de-sac with
landscape screening to protect the residential character, privacy and security of
the Amberley Woods Courtyard neighborhood.
The Commission recognized in its discussions that two aspects of the proposed project
were not under its purview, the demolition of the existing residence and the economic
impacts of the proposed development. The Commission did not address these issues.
The background materials for this agenda item begin on page 46 of the Council’s
packet. The materials include the detailed recommendation and a report from the Plan
Commission providing further details on the proposed development and on the Plan
Commission’s deliberations. The full record for this petition, including all previous Plan
Commission packet and correspondence received, is available upon request from the
Community Development Department.
COUNCIL ACTION: By motion, provide direction regarding the Plan Commission’s
recommendation on the Amberley Woods petition: 1) direct that revision of the plans
and review by appropriate Boards and Commissions proceed in accordance with the
recommendations as forwarded by the Plan Commission, or 2) direct that revision of the
plans and review by appropriate Boards and Commissions proceed in accordance with
the recommendations as modified by the City Council, or 3) indicate that the Council
does not support the petition.
8. ADDITIONAL ITEMS FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION 9:00 p.m.
9. ADJOURNMENT 9:05 p.m.
Office of the City Manager July 2, 2014
The City of Lake Forest is subject to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities
12
July 7, 2014 City Council Agenda
Act of 1990. Individuals with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who require
certain accommodations in order to allow them to observe and/or participate in this
meeting, or who have questions regarding the accessibility of the meeting or the
facilities, are required to contact City Manager Robert R. Kiely, Jr., at (847) 234-2600
promptly to allow the City to make reasonable accommodations for those persons.
13
ROLLOVERS FY15
VENDOR DESCRIPTION Balance
American Legal Publishing Codification project 7,792.50$
Client First Consulting IT Assistance 24,105.00$
Strand Associates Database build for Water Plant 5,163.00$
DiVinci Painters Exterior painting 8,400.00$
La Force Door work at MS Bldg 12,515.00$
Structurelogic Inc Salt Bay Engineering/Design 7,500.00$
Delf's Garage Snow Plow 5,675.00$
ACS Government Firehouse interface 17,095.00$
New World Systems Firehouse interface 5,000.00$
GENERAL FUND 93,245.50$
Great Lakes 10-S Resurface Northcroft Tennis Courts 40,845.00$
Peter Baker & Son Bike Path Paving 5,000.00$
PARKS AND PUBLIC LAND 45,845.00$
H W Lochner Inc.Woodbine Bridge Engineering 55,365.98$
Motor Fuel Tax Fund 55,365.98$
Plante & Moran Project Management/Needs Assessment 16,700.00$
La Force Fob System for Stirling Hall 6,791.00$
PARKS AND RECREATION FUND 23,491.00$
Conservation Design Ravine Engineering - Phase II 38,680.00$
CEMETERY FUND 38,680.00$
Integrity Group Co Vertical Lift 9,206.00$
Mag Construction Vertical Lift Project 24,475.00$
Special Rec 33,681.00$
Community PartnersAfford.Housing Affordable Housing 50,000.00$
Affordable Housing 50,000.00$
IT Capital Projects IT 5 Yr Capital Projects 105,000.00$
Wiss Janney Elstner Bridge Maintenance and Repairs 24,995.00$
Grainger LED Light Conversion 59,969.88$
T Y Lin CBD Trail 7,981.40$
Various Nurseries Trees 59,069.00$
Pro-Temp of Illinois Gorton HVAC replacement project 30,072.00$
Peter Baker & Son Bike Path Paving 100,000.00$
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 387,087.28$
Strand Associates Water System Engineering Report 10,000.00$
Westside Mechanical Reznor Heater Replacement 7,602.00$
Demuth Inc Replace 3 Hydrants 9,000.00$
Ads Environmental Leak Detection 15,770.00$
WATER AND SEWER FUND 42,372.00$
Delf's Garage V-Plow for W&S Truck 5,809.00$
Bray Sales Bray Valves 13,393.00$
Flolo Corp Mussel Control System 19,245.00$
Smith Ecological Systems Force Flow Level Sensor 8,241.00$
Verder Inc Chemical Feed Pump 9,793.75$
R A Mancini Water Main - West Fork 40,420$
WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 96,901.87$
GRAND TOTAL OF ALL FUNDS 866,669.63$
14
AN ORDINANCE MAKING APPROPRIATION FOR CORPORATE PURPOSES AND
FOR THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, COUNTY OF
LAKE AND STATE OF ILLINOIS, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING
MAY 1, 2014 AND ENDING APRIL 30, 2015
BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST,
an Illinois special charter and home rule municipal corporation
located in Lake County, Illinois, as follows:
Section 1: That the following sums, or so much thereof as may be authorized by
law, be and the same are hereby appropriated from the respective fund designated
in this ordinance for the corporate purposes of The City of Lake Forest and for the
objects and purposes stated herein according to departments and other separate
agencies, and for the Public Schools of The City of Lake Forest, County of Lake and
State of Illinois, to defray the necessary expenses of the City and its Public
Schools for the fiscal year commencing May 1, 2014 and ending April 30, 2015.
GENERAL FUND
General Government Appropriation
Salaries and Benefits 2,782,972$
Supplies/Other Services and Charges 5,343,891
Contingency - to meet expenses of emergencies
and optional expenses not otherwise provided for 3,199,585
TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 11,326,448$
Law
Contractual Services 500,000$
TOTAL LAW 500,000$
Community Development
Salaries and Benefits 1,471,897$
Supplies/Other Services and Charges 159,406
Capital Equipment -
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1,631,303$
Public Works Administration
Salaries and Benefits 407,386$
Supplies/Other Services and Charges 64,296
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 471,682$
Public Buildings
Building Maintenance
Salaries and Benefits 803,701$
Supplies/Other Services and Charges 704,014
TOTAL PUBLIC BUILDINGS 1,507,715$
15
Streets Appropriation
Salaries and Benefits 988,107$
Supplies/ Other Service and Charges 779,744
TOTAL STREETS 1,767,851$
Sanitation
Salaries and Benefits 1,201,353$
Supplies/ Other Service and Charges 1,058,913
TOTAL SANITATION 2,260,266$
Storm Sewers
Salaries and Benefits 122,749$
Supplies/ Other Service and Charges 34,488
TOTAL STORM SEWERS 157,237$
Engineering
Salaries and Benefits 500,510$
Supplies/ Other Service and Charges 90,352
TOTAL ENGINEERING 590,862$
Fire
Administration
Salaries and Benefits 4,461,580$
Supplies/ Other Service and Charges 1,402,600
Sub-Total 5,864,180$
Emergency Medical Services
Supplies/ Other Service and Charges 25,000$
Sub-Total 25,000$
Fire Suppression
Supplies/ Other Service and Charges 95,502$
Sub-Total 95,502$
TOTAL FIRE 5,984,682$
Police
Salaries and Benefits 6,633,499$
Supplies/ Other Service and Charges 2,363,889
TOTAL POLICE 8,997,388$
TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED FROM THE GENERAL FUND 35,195,434$
16
Lake Forest Hospital Project Appropriation
Supplies/Other Services and Charges 60,000$
Contingency to meet expenses of emergencies and expenses
not otherwise provided for 6,000
TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED FROM Lake Forest Hospital Project Fund 66,000$
PARK AND PUBLIC LAND FUND
Park Improvements 235,845$
Contingency to meet expenses for emergencies and expenses
not otherwise provided for 23,585
TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED FROM THE
PARK AND PUBLIC LAND FUND 259,430$
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
Capital Improvements 1,875,366$
Contingency to meet expenses for emergencies and capital
improvements not otherwise provided for 187,537
TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED FROM THE
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 2,062,903$
EMERGENCY TELEPHONE FUND
Police
Salaries and Benefits 182,808$
Supplies/ Other Service and Charges 99,773
Capital Equipment -
Contingency to meet expenses for emergencies and expenses
not otherwise provided for 28,258
TOTAL POLICE 310,839$
TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED FROM THE
EMERGENCY TELEPHONE FUND 310,839$
SENIOR RESOURCES COMMISSION FUND
Salaries and Benefits 366,263$
Supplies/Other Services and Charges 232,933
Contingency to meet expenses for emergencies and capital
improvements not otherwise provided for 59,920
TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED FROM THE
SENIOR RESOURCES COMMISSION FUND 659,116$
17
PARKS AND RECREATION FUND Appropriation
Recreation
Recreation Programs
Salaries and Benefits 3,160,522$
Supplies/ Other Service and Charges 2,234,309
Capital Equipment 51,200
Sub-Total 5,446,031$
Parks Equipment Reserve 150,000
Recreation Development Fund 100,000
Contingency to meet expenses of emergencies and expenses
not otherwise provided for 911,472
TOTAL RECREATION SECTION 6,607,503$
Parks and Forestry
Administration
Salaries and Benefits 2,326,664$
Supplies/ Other Service and Charges 571,092
Capital Equipment 150,000
Sub-Total 3,047,756$
Grounds Maintenance
Supplies/ Other Service and Charges 204,800$
Sub-Total 204,800$
Athletic Field Plg/Tennis
Supplies/ Other Service and Charges 59,000$
Sub-Total 59,000$
Lakefront Facilities
Supplies/ Other Service and Charges 38,500$
Capital Equipment -
Sub-Total 38,500$
Tree Trimming
Supplies/ Other Service and Charges 26,000$
Sub-Total 26,000$
Tree Removal
Supplies/ Other Service and Charges 15,500$
Sub-Total 15,500$
Insect & Disease
Supplies/ Other Service and Charges 17,630$
Sub-Total 17,630$
18
Tree & Shrub Planting/Care Appropriation
Supplies/ Other Service and Charges 9,500$
Sub-Total 9,500$
TOTAL PARKS AND FORESTRY SECTION 3,418,686$
TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED FROM THE
PARKS AND RECREATION FUND 10,026,189$
SPECIAL RECREATION FUND
Salaries and Benefits 46,504$
Supplies/Other Services and Charges 248,534
Capital Improvements 172,606
Contingency to meet expenses for emergencies and capital
improvements not otherwise provided for 46,764
TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED FROM THE
SPECIAL RECREATION FUND 514,408$
CEMETERY COMMISSION FUND
Salaries and Benefits 349,018$
Supplies/Other Services and Charges 227,987
Debt Retirement 142,700
Capital Improvements 288,680
Contingency to meet expenses of emergencies and operational
expenses not otherwise provided for 100,839
TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED FROM THE
CEMETERY COMMISSION FUND 1,109,224$
PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND
Library Services
Salaries and Benefits 2,585,322$
Supplies/Other Services and Charges 974,000
Building Maintenance - Supplies/Other Services and Charges 147,000$
Contingency to meet expenses of emergencies and
operational expenses not otherwise provided for 393,132
Sub-Total 4,099,454$
Capital Equipment 75,000$
Capital Improvements 150,000
Sub-Total 225,000$
TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED FROM THE
PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND 4,324,454$
19
FOREIGN FIRE INSURANCE FUND Appropriation
Supplies/Other Services and Charges 200,000$
Contingency to meet expenses of emergencies and expenses
not otherwise provided for 20,000
TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED FROM FOREIGN FIRE INSURANCE FUND 220,000$
DRUG ASSET FORFEITURE FUND
Supplies/Other Services and Charges 30,000$
Contingency to meet expenses of emergencies and expenses
not otherwise provided for 3,000
TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED FROM DRUG ASSET FORFEITURE FUND 33,000$
ALCOHOL ASSET FORFEITURE FUND
Supplies/Other Services and Charges 65,000$
Contingency to meet expenses of emergencies and expenses
not otherwise provided for 6,500
TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED FROM ALCOHOL ASSET FORFEITURE FUND 71,500$
HOUSING TRUST FUND
Supplies/Other Services and Charges 300,000$
Capital Improvements -
Contingency to meet expenses for emergencies and capital
improvements not otherwise provided for 30,000
TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED FROM THE HOUSING TRUST FUND 330,000$
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND
Salaries and Benefits -$
Supplies/Other Services and Charges -
Capital Equipment 431,000
Capital Improvements 8,458,863
Contingency to meet expenses for emergencies and capital
improvements not otherwise provided for 888,986
TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED FROM THE
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 9,778,849$
20
RT 60 BRIDGE FUND Appropriation
Capital Improvements 1,032,000$
Contingency to meet expenses for emergencies and capital
improvements not otherwise provided for 103,200
TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED FROM THE
RT 60 BRIDGE FUND 1,135,200$
RT 60 INTERSECTION FUND
Capital Improvements 418,000$
Contingency to meet expenses for emergencies and capital
improvements not otherwise provided for 41,800
TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED FROM THE
RT 60 INTERSECTION FUND 459,800$
WATER AND SEWER FUND
General Government
Salaries and Benefits 213,030$
Supplies/Other Services and Charges 2,812,076
Debt retirement 2,210,420
Contingency to meet expenses for emergencies and capital
improvements not otherwise provided for 857,049
TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 6,092,575$
Public Works
Salaries and Benefits 1,890,717$
Supplies/Other Services and Charges 1,444,250
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 3,334,967$
TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED FROM THE
WATER AND SEWER FUND 9,427,542$
WATER AND SEWER CAPITAL FUND
Capital Equipment -$
Capital Improvements 2,751,902
Contingency to meet expenses for emergencies and capital
improvements not otherwise provided for 275,190
TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED FROM THE
WATER AND SEWER CAPITAL FUND 3,027,092$
21
DEERPATH GOLF COURSE FUND Appropriation
Administration
Salaries and Benefits 537,557$
Supplies/Other Services and Charges 187,221
Capital Equipment 60,000
Contingency to meet expenses for emergencies and capital
improvements not otherwise provided for 160,306
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION 945,084$
Course Maintenance
Salaries and Benefits -$
Supplies/Other Services and Charges 201,166
TOTAL COURSE MAINTENANCE 201,166$
Clubhouse
Salaries and Benefits 84,038$
Supplies/Other Services and Charges 533,080
TOTAL CLUBHOUSE 617,118$
TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED FROM THE
DEERPATH GOLF COURSE FUND 1,763,368$
FLEET FUND
Salaries and Benefits 690,189$
Supplies/Other Services and Charges 1,229,747
Contingency to meet expenses for emergencies and capital
improvements not otherwise provided for 191,994
TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED FROM THE FLEET FUND 2,111,930$
LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND
Supplies/Other Services and Charges 1,210,853$
Contingency to meet expenses for emergencies and capital
improvements not otherwise provided for 121,085
TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED FROM THE
LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND 1,331,938$
SELF INSURANCE FUND
Supplies/Other Services and Charges 5,140,706$
Contingency to meet expenses for emergencies and capital
improvements not otherwise provided for 514,071
TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED FROM THE
SELF INSURANCE FUND 5,654,777$
22
FIREFIGHTERS' PENSION FUND Appropriation
Other Services and Charges 1,873,760$
Contingency to meet expenses for emergencies and expenses
not otherwise provided for 187,376
TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED FROM THE
FIREFIGHTERS' PENSION FUND 2,061,136$
POLICE PENSION FUND
Other Services and Charges 2,232,027$
Contingency to meet expenses for emergencies and expenses
not otherwise provided for 223,203
TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED FROM THE
POLICE PENSION FUND 2,455,230$
Public Schools THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Not available until second reading of the ordinance
School District No. 67
From the Education Fund -$
From the Operations, Building and Maintenance Fund -
From the Capital Projects Fund -
From the Illinois Municipal Retirement/Social Security Fund -
From the Working Cash Fund -
From the Transportation Fund -
TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS
OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST (School District No. 67)-$
23
Summary of the Amounts Appropriated From the Several Funds
Fund Appropriation
General 35,195,434$
Lake Forest Hospital Project 66,000
Park and Public Land 259,430
Motor Fuel Tax 2,062,903
Emergency Telephone 310,839
Senior Resources Commission 659,116
Parks and Recreation 10,026,189
Special Recreation 514,408
Cemetery Commission 1,109,224
Public Library 4,324,454
Foreign Fire Insurance 220,000
Drug Asset Forfeiture 33,000
Alcohol Asset Forfeiture 71,500
Affordable Housing 330,000
Capital Improvements 9,778,849
Rt. 60 Bridge 1,135,200
Rt. 60 Intersection 459,800
Water and Sewer 9,427,542
Water and Sewer Capital Fund 3,027,092
Deerpath Golf Course 1,763,368
Fleet 2,111,930
Liability Insurance 1,331,938
Self Insurance 5,654,777
Firefighters' Pension 2,061,136
Police Pension 2,455,230
Sub-Total 94,389,358$
The City of Lake Forest School District No. 67
Not available until second reading of the ordinance
Education -$
Operations, Building and Maintenance -
Capital Projects -
Illinois Municipal Retirement/Social Security -
Working Cash -
Transportation -
Sub-Total -$
GRAND TOTAL 94,389,358$
24
Section 2: That any sum of money heretofore appropriated and not expended
now in the Treasury of The City of Lake Forest, or that hereafter may come into
the Treasury of The City of Lake Forest, is hereby reappropriated by this
Ordinance.
Section 3: That the funds derived from sources other than the 2013 tax levy
and other revenue pledged for specific purposes may be allotted by the Mayor
and City Council to such appropriations and in such amounts respectively,
as said Corporate Authorities may determine within the limits of said
appropriations, respectively, insofar as doing same does not conflict with
the law.
Section 4: That any unexpended balances of any items of any general appropriation
made by this Ordinance may be expended in making up any deficiency in any other
item in the same general appropriation made by this Ordinance and is hereby
appropriated therefore.
Section 5: That any sum of money received for a specific purpose or category
of expenditure from any source other than real estate taxes (including without
limitation grants and donations) that is not specifically authorized by this
appropriation ordinance shall be authorized for expenditure upon acceptance of such
sum of money by the City, provided that such expenditure is approved in accordance with
applicable City ordinances and procedures.
Section 6: That the sum of money that the Corporate Authorities of the City
(or such subordinate body of the City empowered to authorize the expenditure
of funds) have approved, or will approve, to satisfy a lawful debt of the City,
and for which money is available in the Treasury (or in the specific fund
over which a subordinate body may have authority) at the time of such
approval, is hereby appropriated by this ordinance.
Section 7: That if any item or portion thereof of this Appropriation Ordinance
is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portion of such item or the remaining portions of this Ordinance.
Section 8: The City Council shall at any time have the power,
to make transfers of sums of money appropriated for one corporate object
or purpose, but no appropriation for any object or purposes shall thereby
be reduced below any amount sufficient to cover all obligations incurred
or to be incurred against such appropriation.
Section 9: At any time during the fiscal year when an expenditure
shall exceed the amounts set forth in this ordinance and there are funds available
in the City's Treasury, the City Council may approve such expenditure
and grant a supplemental appropriation for such purpose contemporaneously.
25
Section 10: This ordinance shall be in force ten (10) days from and after its
passage, approval and publication.
PASSED THIS ____ day of ________________, 2014
____________________________________________
APPROVED THIS ____ day of ________________, 2014
_____________________________________________
ATTEST:
______________________________________
City Clerk
That this ordinance be published in pamphlet form and be made available to the
public at the City Hall service counter.
26
The City of Lake Forest
CITY COUNCIL
Proceedings of the June 19, 2014
6:30 p.m. Special Start time
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Honorable Mayor Schoenheider called the meeting to order at
6:30 pm, and Deputy City Clerk Margaret Boyer called the roll of Council members.
Present: Mayor Schoenheider, Alderman Waldeck, Alderman Beidler, Alderman Moore, Alderman
Tack, Alderman Reisenberg, Alderman Adelman and Alderman Moreno.
Absent: Alderman Pandaleon
Also present were: Bob Kiely, City Manager, Carina Walters, Assistant City Manager; Victor
Filippini, City Attorney; Susan Banks, Communications Manager; Catherine Czerniak, Director of
Community Development; Michael Thomas, Director of Public Works; Dan Martin, Superintendent
of Public Works; James Held, Chief of Police, Karl Walldorf, Deputy Chief of Police.
There were approximately 30 present in the audience.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all in attendance.
REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS
COMMENTS BY MAYOR
A. Resolution of Appreciation for U.L. Jernigan
Mayor Schoenheider read the Resolution.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve the Resolution
Alderman Moore made a motion to approve the Resolution, seconded by Alderman Moreno.
Motion carried unanimously by voice vote.
1. Deer Path Middle School Association of Parent and Teachers (APT)
-Christie Theis, President and Allison Cekay, District 67 Executive
APT President
Christie Theis, along with three Deer Path Middle school students thanked Mr. Jernigan for his
dedicated service in helping ensure the safe passage of themselves and countless others. The Lake
Forest Police Department also presented Mr. Jernigan with a plaque.
B. 2014-2015 New Board and Commission Appointments/Reappointments
BUILDING REVIEW BOARD
NAME OF MEMBER APPOINT/REAPPOINT WARD
Fred Moyer Re-appoint 1
27
Proceedings of the June 19, 2014
Regular City Council Meeting
PLAN COMMISSION
NAME OF MEMBER APPOINT/REAPPOINT WARD
Tim Henry Appoint 3
Jeff Kuchman Re-appoint 1
PUBLIC SERVICE AWARD COMMITTEE
NAME OF MEMBER APPOINT
Roger Mohr Appoint for 1 Year Term
Mayor Schoenheider read the appointments.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve the Mayors Appointment
Alderman Reisenberg made a motion to approve the Mayor’s appointments, seconded by
Alderman Moreno. Motion carried unanimously by voice vote.
C. Report and Recommendation from the Personnel, Compensation and
Administration Committee on the employment agreement with the City
Manager
Mayor Schoenheider asked for a motion to approve the Agreement with the City Manager.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve the Agreement with the City Manager
Alderman Reisenberg made a motion to approve the Agreement with the City Manager, seconded
by Alderman Moore. The following voted “Yea”: Aldermen Waldeck, Beidler, Moore, Tack,
Reisenberg, Adelman and Moreno. The following voted “Nay”: None. 7 Yeas, 0 Nays, motion
carried.
COMMENTS BY CITY MANAGER
A. Community Spotlight-
Lake Forest Preservation Foundation
Gail Hodges, President
City Manager Robert Kiely said that residents should have received the Annual Report for the
Preservation Foundation, and introduced its President Gail Hodges. Ms. Hodges said that the
awards program began in 1991, and since then have recognized over 200 buildings and landscapes
and added that The City of Lake Forest has more than 1200 documented structures’ and
landscapes. She then introduced Steve Douglass, who announced Award Categories and the
winners:
Preservation; 1522 Estate Lane, 965 Castlegate Court
Reconstruction; 750 North Sheridan Road
Infill; 276 Rose Terrace
Restoration; 815 Barberry Lane, 55 North Mayflower Road, Deerpath Estate Gates, Gates at
Castlegate Court,
28
Proceedings of the June 19, 2014
Regular City Council Meeting
Rehabilitation; 60 North Western Avenue, 340 North Ahwahnee Road, 941 East Westminster, 111
West Westminster.
Mayor Schoenheider thanked Mr. Douglass and Ms. Hodges for all they do in the community, and
Alderman Reisenberg added that he is proud to live in Lake Forest.
B. Farmers Market Update
Susan Kelsey, Economic Development Coordinator
Economic Development Coordinator, Susan Kelsey reported that the 4th Annual Farmers Market
will be opening on Saturday June 14 at the East Lake Forest train station and will be open from 8
am to 1 pm. She added there are new items to the Market such as live music, kid corral, family
picnic area and a Lake Forest College organic garden. Ms. Kelsey introduced Karl Morcott, of Food
Share Food.com, whose community outreach is to provide healthy whole foods to families less
fortunate in need. The program will run from June 28 through August 9. More information can be
found by visiting FoodShareFood.com
C. Report on City of Lake Forest Assistance with Rebuilding Efforts in Washington,
IL
Presented by Community Development Department Staff
Robert Kiely, City Manager, reported that when he spoke to the City Manager in Washington IL, to
see how The City of Lake Forest could aid his community, it was immediately clear that due to the
vast devastation of the tornado that struck almost one year prior, Building Inspectors were
needed. Catherine Czerniak, Director of Community Development explained that the staff in
Community Development is fully cross trained which allowed for some employees to go to
Washington, IL , while leaving other qualified co-workers to work in the City. She then introduced
Chris Teresi, who is a permit coordinator for The City of Lake Forest and recently certified as a
Residential Plans Examiner and a Residential Inspector.
Ms. Teresi stated that on November 17, 2013 an F4 tornado destroyed or damaged over 1100
homes and 4 businesses in Washington IL, a town with a population of just over 15,000. She said
that there are over 600 tornado damage-related permits that have been submitted and more
were coming each day. She said that Washington had only one Inspector, who is 87 years old, and
he is doing his best to cover the volume of inspections with the urgency needed to the best of his
ability. Many other communities responded by sending Inspectors and there are volunteers lined
up through July to help. Ms. Teresi said she expected that help would be needed through the end
of the year.
She added that the few residents that remain in these neighborhoods have contended with long
days filled with the noise and disruption of countless homes being rebuilt or finally demolished.
She reported that very few trees remain in these established neighborhoods that once had mature
trees lining the streets and properties. She shared images of the tornados destruction.
She concluded by thanking the Mayor, the City Manager and Catherine Czerniak for responding to
the request to assist a city in need, to her coworkers who provided additional coverage during
their absence, and expressed her gratefulness for the opportunity to be a small part in the
recovery effort.
29
Proceedings of the June 19, 2014
Regular City Council Meeting
COMMENTS BY COUNCIL MEMBERS
None
OPPORTUNITY FOR CITIZENS TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
None
ITEMS FOR OMNIBUS VOTE CONSIDERATION
1. Approval of the June 2, 2014 City Council meeting Minutes
2. Resolution of Appreciation for Board & Commission Members
3. Request to Modify and Extend the Contract for Disposing of the City’s Municipal
Solid Waste
4. Consideration of a Recommendation from the Zoning Board of Appeals in
Support of Amendments to the Special Use Permit for Ragdale. (First Reading,
and if Desired by the City Council, Final Approval)
5. Consideration of Ordinances Approving Recommendations from the Building
Review Board. (First Reading and if Desired by the City Council, Final Approval)
Mayor Schoenheider asked Council if they would like any item removed or be taken separately,
and seeing none, asked for a motion to approve the five (5) Omnibus items as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve the Five (5) Omnibus items as presented.
Alderman Reisenberg made a motion approving the Omnibus items as presented, seconded by
Alderman Beidler. The following voted “Yea”: Aldermen Waldeck, Beidler, Moore, Tack,
Reisenberg, Adelman and Moreno. The following voted “Nay”: None. 7 Yeas, 0 Nays, motion
carried.
Information such as Purpose and Action Requested, Background/Discussion, Budget/Fiscal Impact,
Recommended Action and a Staff Contact as it relates to the Omnibus items can be found on the agenda.
ORDINANCES
None.
NEW BUSINESS
1. Discussion on Water Plant Operations and Request to Modify the Scope of
Services for the Water Plant Performance Study.
Michael Thomas, Director of Public Works, reported to the Council that Staff is seeking approval to
modify the scope of services for the water plant performance study. He added that at its
30
Proceedings of the June 19, 2014
Regular City Council Meeting
February 18, 2014 City Council meeting, City Council approved a professional services agreement
with Strand Associates to perform a detailed study of the plant operation and provide assistance
in developing a ten year capital plan. The study was to be substantially completed by September,
2014 and such findings were to be incorporated into the F.Y. 2016 capital improvement budget.
Mr. Thomas stated that in early May, 2014, the City received a letter from the plant’s filter vendor,
AquaSource, noting that the company had decided to no longer produce the filters used at Lake
Forest’s water plant. He said that the water plant is 10 years old as of April 24, and although it had
come as a surprise, the City Council had been discussing water rates over the past eight months.
One of the things the City Council directed Public Works to look at was what are the other filter
companies on the market and how we (The City of Lake Forest) look at possibly expanding the
water plant for more volume, as well not being tied down to one company that make the filters.
Michael Thomas then introduced Brian Hackman of Strand and Associates who gave a review of
what the study was initially going to do and what this request will focus on.
• Provide specific procedures to optimize the entire membrane filter system
• Conduct “performance tests” of the entire water plant to confirm the treatment capacity
of the existing AquaSource system
• Develop a prioritized maintenance plan
• Develop improvements to help meet future expectations (e.g. production capacity vs.
system demands/water sales)
• Address past concerns and issues with the water treatment plant
• Identify other process improvements (e.g., ancillary systems to maintain the membrane
system performance)
The proposed revised study for $105,900 would include the following tasks:
• Summarize existing and future water system demands (included in the original task order)
• Identify short term membrane system improvements using the existing AquaSource
modules
• Identify long term membrane system improvements through an evaluation of available
replacement membrane filtration technologies
• Identify non-membrane system needs within the water treatment plant infrastructure
• Develop a 20 year capital needs plan and project phasing/sequencing to maintain water
treatment plant production for the City
Members of the City Council asked that Strand and Associates address additional concerns that
include; investigate all options on filters, adjust the criteria based on current conditions and any
anticipated conditions, define goals and expectations of the study.
City Manager Robert Kiely added that at the time of building the Water Treatment Plant, it was
based on cutting edge technology and in this circumstance it was the wrong aspect. The difference
in a 10” and 18” was integrity and structural high packing density. He also reported that Staff has
31
Proceedings of the June 19, 2014
Regular City Council Meeting
reached out to AquaSource to run another series of filters which would afford the City more time
in identifying where the industry will more forward next.
Funding Tables:
FY2014 Funding
Source
Fund Number
Account
Budget
Amount
Requested
Budgeted?
Y/N
Water Fund CIP 508-0001 $53,000 $20,000 N
FY2015 Funding
Source
Fund Number
Account
Budget
Amount
Requested
Budgeted?
Y/N
Water Fund CIP 508-0001 $100,000 $85,900 Y
COUNCIL ACTION: Staff requests that City Council approve Strand Associate’s revised scope of
services for the water plant performance study in the amount of $105,900 as noted in the above
funding tables, and including addressing additional outlined concerns by the City Council.
Alderman Reisenberg made a motion approving Strand Associate’s revised scope of services for
the water plant performance study in the amount of $105,900 as noted in the above funding
tables, seconded by Alderman Waldeck. The following voted “Yea”: Aldermen Waldeck, Beidler,
Moore, Tack, Reisenberg, Adelman and Moreno. The following voted “Nay”: None. 7 Yeas, 0 Nays,
motion carried.
ADDITIONAL ITEMS FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION
None
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business. Alderman Tack made a motion to adjourn, seconded by
Alderman Reisenberg. Motion carried unanimously by voice vote at 7:45 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Margaret Boyer
Deputy City Clerk
A video of the City Council meeting is available for viewing at the Lake Forest Library and on file in
the Clerk’s office at City Hall. You can also view it on the website by
visiting www.cityoflakeforest.com. Click on I Want To, then click on View, then choose Archived
Meetings Videos.
32
33
THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST
RESOLUTION NO. ____________
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY OVERFLOW BEACH PARKING
DURING FOREST PARK CONSTRUCTION
WHEREAS, The City of Lake Forest (the “City”) is a home rule special charter
municipality established and existing in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois
of 1970; and
WHEREAS, on May 21, 2012, the City Council approved a Master Plan to guide the
rehabilitation, restoration, enhancement and preservation (“the Improvements”) of Forest Park,
a City owned park; and
WHEREAS, March 8, 2013, the City Manager, as directed by the City Council, entered
into the Forest Park Agreement which documents a partnership between the City of Lake Forest
and the Forest Park Project Corporation for the purpose of implementing the Improvements; and
WHEREAS, construction of said improvements is underway and will continue through
the summer/fall of 2014; and
WHEREAS, due to construction, parking in and around Forest Park will be limited and
may not meet the demand for parking particularly on days of peak activity at the beach; and
WHEREAS, designating two, temporary, overflow parking locations; one on the Lake
Forest College Campus, and one along the south side of Deerpath between Sheridan and
Washington Roads, for the duration of the construction period, in addition to the overflow
parking available in the public parking lots in the Central Business District, will provide a
convenience for the residents; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City and
its residents to provide for temporary overflow parking during construction of the Improvements
at Forest Park;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, COUNTY OF LAKE, STATE OF ILLINOIS, as follows:
34
2
SECTION ONE: RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are incorporated in, and made a
part of, this Resolution by this reference as findings of the City Council of The City of Lake
Forest.
SECTION TWO: APP ROVAL OF TEMPORARY PARKING. For the duration of the
construction of the Improvements at Forest Park, overflow parking for the beach is authorized
on an as-needed basis in the areas as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part
hereof. The limitations on parking in these areas is temporarily suspended in accordance with
this Resolution and the City Council directs City Staff to suspend any Code enforcement actions
related to parking that is inconsistent with this resolution; provided, however, that enforcement
of City Code provisions unrelated to the designate overflow parking areas and necessary to
protect the public health, safety, and welfare may be enforced.
SECTION THREE: DIRECTION TO STAFF. Staff is directed to develop and implement
a temporary overflow parking Operations Plan which shall include, but not be limited to the
following:
1. Communication and coordination with representatives of the First Presbyterian Church
and Lake Forest College to identify and develop a schedule to avoid conflicts with events
at those institutions.
2. Communication with residents near the overflow parking areas; at the least but not
limited to a mailing including a letter introducing the plan and a copy of this Resolution.
3. Criteria for determining when overflow parking areas will be put into use and who will
make the decision to activate the overflow areas.
4. A temporary signage plan.
5. Procedures for monitoring the overflow parking areas.
SECTION FOUR: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect
upon the passage and approval.
PASSED THIS 7th DAY OF JULY, 2014.
AYES:
35
3
NAYS:
ABSENT:
APPROVED THIS 7th DAY OF JULY, 2014.
_______________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________
City Clerk
36
Memorandum
To: Mary Van Arsdale, Lake Forest Parks and Recreation Board, Lake Forest City Council
From: Chris Moshier and Mike Riffel
Date: June 12, 2014
Re: Parks and Recreation Software Replacement Project Summary
In January 2014, the City engaged Plante Moran’s Government Technology Consulting Team to assess the
existing parks and recreation management application environment and provide independent assistance to
the City throughout the software selection process. Over the past several months, the City has completed a
thorough process of conducting a parks and recreation software needs assessment and system selection.
The remainder of this memorandum summarizes the activities conducted by the City, with assistance
provided by Plante Moran, which has resulted in the City Selection Committee’s recommendation of the
preferred finalist vendor.
CURRENT SITUATION OVERVIEW
The mission of the Software Replacement Project was to provide an integrated Parks and Recreation system
that will support City staff in the delivery of services and activities, take advantage of best practices, and
significantly improve the efficiency and effectiveness of customer service and business processes.
To develop a leadership structure for the project, the City established a Steering Committee to support the
software selection process and key decisions related to it. The Steering Committee included participation by
key stakeholders representing parks and recreation, information technology, and finance process areas.
Additionally, through a Project Charter the Steering Committee established the following objectives for the
successful completion of the Parks and Recreation Software Replacement Project:
Replace core Parks and Recreation systems (CLASS) and shadow systems with a web/internet
based, transaction based, integrated Parks and Recreation system.
Have more effective business processes & replace paper-oriented processes using e-forms,
document imaging and workflow.
Protect and enhance the functionality that is currently available to City employees.
Provide better front-end services by improving back-end services & systems.
Incorporate fully integrated Parks and Recreation "best business practices"
Develop a system that is user-friendly and empowers departments to improve their business
processes and reporting capability
Add and improve functionality in back-office functional areas
Improve quality and accessibility of information for business process planning decision support
Eliminate paper-based workflow processes and forms
Reduce redundant “shadow systems”, data entry, storage, and paper processing
Improve operational effectiveness and productivity
Enable specific strategic planning initiatives (e.g. e-Government), including enhanced customer
service and web/customer self-service
Reduce the number of systems we own and support and their related costs by retiring existing
legacy and back office "systems" and tools
Increase the City’s ability for greater use of mobile applications/devices
37
-2-
SOFTWARE SELECTION SUMMARY
During the month of January, a series of interviews were conducted with City staff to identify software needs
for a new integrated recreation management solution as well as functional gaps in the City’s current
recreation management systems. Interviews were conducted with stakeholders from Parks and Recreation
as well as other City departments who have similar functional needs that may be satisfied through recreation
software including CROYA and Senior Services.
The information compiled through these interviews was referenced along with other background information
provided by the City to prepare a Needs Assessment report which was presented to the City Manager prior
to proceeding to the Request for Proposal (RFP) development and selection phase of the project. The
Needs Assessment report included several key findings and opportunities which supported the City’s belief
that the current system did not satisfy its requirements. Plante Moran summarized several formal
recommendations to the City in the report which included replacing the current system.
Following authorization to proceed to the selection phase, the information compiled through the stakeholder
interviews was used as the major source of input into the development of a draft Request for Proposal
(RFP). The RFP was significantly detailed to document the City requirements for a new recreation
management system. In addition to system requirements, the RFP included minimum proposal criteria,
described the criteria for initial proposal evaluation and established finalist vendor selection activities and
criteria.
The City established a Selection Committee and a evaluation process prior to issuing an RFP. The Selection
Committee would be responsible for scoring each proposal based on a defined set of criteria during multiple
rounds of evaluation.
After the City stakeholders reviewed and prioritized the draft software specifications, Plante Moran facilitated
cross-functional specification review sessions to confirm the requirements to be incorporated into the RFP.
Additionally, Plante Moran facilitated a work session to review and edit the draft RFP with participation of the
Steering Committee in late February. Following this, the City’s Selection Committee performed a detailed
review of the RFP and provided feedback which was incorporated into the final version.
On March 7, 2014 the RFP was distributed to a significant number of recreation software providers which
were identified by the project team. It was the intent of the City to select, if possible, a single turn-key vendor
solution that would satisfy a significant portion of the City’s needs. The process included vendor Q&A, a pre-
bid meeting, as well as multiple RFP addendums to clarify the City’s requirements.
On April 21, 2014 four vendor responses were received and all four proposals were deemed to satisfy the
minimum criteria and proceed onto further evaluation. The responses included:
1. ACTIVE Network
2. eTrak-plus
3. Vermont Systems
4. Volgistics
The one-time and on-going prices of the qualified proposal responses ranged widely as did the overall
solution scope. Additionally, there were varying levels of response to the proposal requirements that
necessitated further review of the proposal responses to develop a more comparable analysis of the
respondents. Plante Moran and the City Selection Committee conducted a detailed review of the
proposals and Plante Moran presented an initial proposal analysis to the Selection Committee that
included a comprehensive review of vendor responses related to software functionality, vendor
background, costs provided by vendors, and compliance with requested contractual terms and conditions.
In order to maximize the thoroughness in reviewing the most qualified solutions, a decision was made to
conduct demonstrations from the top vendors that best met the City’s functional and budgetary
requirements. On May 6, 2014 the City’s Selection Committee met to review the proposals, analysis
materials and determine a short list of semi-finalist vendors. The Selection Committee used the selection
38
-3-
criteria established in the RFP to score and determine that two vendors, eTrak-plus and Vermont
Systems, would be invited to perform software demonstrations.
In late May, both vendors were brought in for one-day software demonstrations. The Selection
Committee and other City stakeholders who use the current recreation software participated in these
demonstrations. Additional City staff participated in the demonstrations who currently do not use the
CLASS software, but were interested in expanded functionality available in current integrated recreation
software systems such as League Scheduling, Maintenance Management, Donation/Memorial
Management.
Following each of the vendor demonstrations, the Selection Committee met to debrief and discuss the
feedback/evaluations as well as the observed strengths and weaknesses of the proposed solution and
company. Following the second demonstration, the Selection Committee discussed high-level feedback
relating to the vendor software demos and unanimously concluded that Vermont Systems offered a
solution with the greater ability to satisfy the City’s most important needs. Because of this, it was
determined that reference checking activities would be conducted to further evaluate Vermont Systems’
solution, implementation, and support services. City staff contacted three references (Wilmette Park
District, IL; Durango Parks and Recreation, CO; and Cape Coral, FL) provided by Vermont Systems and
obtained overall positive feedback related to their solution. The reference checking activities involved
members of the City’s Selection Committee. The City intends to perform additional follow-up reference
checks to further evaluate the vendor’s ability to interface the proposed solution with the City’s current
SunGard HTE financial system.
On June 10th, the Selection Committee reviewed the results of the reference checks conducted scored
the two shortlisted vendors based on the Round 3 Evaluation Criteria identified in the RFP. Vermont
Systems received the higher score and was unanimously determined by the City’s Selection Committee
to be the preferred finalist vendor as summarized below:
eTrak-plus: 53.1 of 100 possible points
Vermont Systems: 77.9 of 100 possible points
The City conducted high-level discussions with Vermont Systems and Plante Moran to determine which
software modules would be appropriate to purchase in preparation for developing a Statement of Work
(SOW) with associated pricing. The current anticipated software purchase includes the following
recreation process areas (please note that not all functions will be satisfied through a dedicated module):
1. Activity Registrations
2. Court Reservations
3. Customer Management
4. Donation and Memorial
Mgmt
5. Facility Reservations
6. League Scheduling
7. Pass and Memberships
8. Payment Processing &
POS
9. Rental Management
10. Trip Reservations
11. Maintenance
Management
12. Event Ticketing
13. Personal Trainer
14. Volunteer Management
15. Various Integrations
Overall, Plante Moran’s Government Technology Consulting team endorses the process that the City has
used to perform the selection and supports the recommendation of the City’s Selection Committee.
39
Project Executive Summary
City of Lake Forest Recreation Software Replacement Project
The Recreation Software Replacement Project began with a needs assessment
phase to document deficiencies in the current system as well as to identify process
improvement opportunities and key decisions to consider during the system selection
phase. Following the needs assessment phase, the City of Lake Forest Recreation Software
Replacement Project Selection Committee was provided several comprehensive proposal analysis
documents which supported the review and evaluation of each vendor’s proposed solution. The following
is an Executive Summary of the key materials which the Selection Committee reviewed. Please
reference the complete report and analysis documents for comprehensive notes and assumptions;
however, below is a summary of each analysis included on the following pages:
1. Needs Assessment and Recommendations Report Excerpts
This is a high-level summary of the key sections prepared within the Needs Assessment and
Recommendations report.
2. Specification Compliance Summary
This analysis is a summary of vendor responses to the functional requirements included in Section 4 of
the City’s Recreation Software Replacement Project RFP. It directly reflects the responses provided by
each vendor which is based on their interpretation of the requirements. As such, this analysis was
intended to serve as an additional resource to the Selection Committee to evaluate the strength of each
vendor’s proposed solution, identify critical functional gaps, and document any specific follow-up
questions for the vendors.
3. Cost and Service Hours Analysis
This analysis is a summary of the proposed costs and service hours for the City of Lake Forest
Recreation Software Replacement Project RFP. It primarily reflects the actual proposed costs for each
vendor as provided in the pricing forms submitted. Unless specifically noted otherwise, all costs
represent the actual proposed costs by each vendor. Throughout the analysis “(VH)” reflect a proposed
vendor-hosted solution and “(OP)” represents a proposed on-premise solution.
40
Page 1 of 2
Excerpts from Parks and Recreation System Replacement Project Needs Assessment and Recommendations Report
Process Areas Included in Needs Assessment Phase
Activity Registration Event Ticketing Maintenance
Management
Rental Management
Court Reservations Facility Reservations Pass and
Memberships
Trip Reservations
Customer Management General and Technical
Requirements
Payment Processing
and Point of Sale
Volunteer
Management
Donation and Memorial
Management
League Scheduling Personal Trainer Related Interfaces to
External Systems
1.2 Key Findings
1.3 Major Opportunities
1. Limited Functionality
2. Unsatisfactory Support
3. Incomplete Utilization
4. Significant Redundancy
5. Inconsistent Communication
6. Strong Customer Focus
7. Fully Committed Team
1. Increase Integration
2. Expand Utilization
3. Minimize Redundancy
4. Improve Usability
5. Retire Shadow Systems as Appropriate
6. Enhance Customer Service
7. Support Information Accessibility
41
Page 2 of 2
1.4 Formal Recommendations
1.5 Significant Decisions
1.5.1 Statement of Work Development Phase Decisions
1. On-Premise vs. Vendor-Hosted
2. Data Conversion
3. Senior Services
4. CROYA
5. Kinderhaven
6. Miscellaneous Third-Party Applications
7. System Access at Satellite Locations
1.5.2 Implementation Phase Decisions
1. Business Process Changes
2. Accounting Processes
3. Web Site Coordination
4. Special Event Management
5. Waiver Management
6. Contract Service Provider Payments
7. Activity Budgeting
1. Replace the Current System
2. Expand Utilization of the New System
3. Evaluate the Benefits of Integration vs. Functionality
4. Assess the Value of Traditional Businss Processes
5. Establish a Formal Authority / Approval Structure
6. Embrace a Formal Project Mgmt. Approach
7. Prepare the Stakeholders for Change
42
982
1,073
1,157
115
34
307
20
18
401
18
257
1,312
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
ACTIVE eTrak Vermont Volgistics
Specification Compliance by Availability | All Priorities
Yes Reporting Third Party Modification Future Not Available
Specification Compliance Analysis.pdf | Page 7 of 240
43
184.9K282.8K383.7K487.5K594.5K704.7K818.2K935.1K1,055.5K1,179.6K136.7K151.7K167.1K183.0K199.4K216.3K233.7K251.6K270.0K289.0K162.2K188.1K214.8K242.3K270.7K299.8K329.9K360.9K392.7K425.6K151.7K166.8K182.4K198.4K214.9K231.9K249.4K267.5K286.1K305.2K1.2K2.4K3.6K4.9K6.2K7.6K9.0K10.5K11.9K13.5K$0$200,000$400,000$600,000$800,000$1,000,000$1,200,000$1,400,000$1,600,000Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 1010-Year Cumulative InvestmentActual Proposed CostsACTIVE (VH)eTrak (VH)Vermont (VH)Vermont (OP)Volgistics (VH)44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
Correspondence Received Since the Plan Commission Meeting on June 11, 2014
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83