The URL can be used to link to this page

CITY COUNCIL 2013/06/03 Agenda THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Monday, June 3, 2013 7:30 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 7:30 p.m. Honorable Donald Schoenheider, Mayor Kent Novit, Alderman First Ward Stanford Tack, Alderman Third Ward Catherine Waldeck, Alderman First Ward Jack Reisenberg, Alderman Third Ward David Moore, Alderman Second Ward Robert Palmer, Alderman Fourth Ward George Pandaleon, Alderman Second Ward Michael Adelman, Alderman Fourth Ward PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS 7:35 p.m. 1. Comments by Mayor 7:35 p.m. A. Deputy City Clerk Margaret Boyer Administers the Oath of Office to: Second Ward Alderman-Elect - - George Pandaleon B. 2012-2013 Board Reappointment LAKE FOREST POLICE PENSION FUND BOARD NAME OF MEMBER APPOINT/REAPPOINT WARD Tom Ford REAPPOINT 2 Recommended Action: Approve appointment recommended by Mayor Schoenheider C. Announcement of this year’s Lake Forest Preservation Awards Presented by Steve Douglass, Foundation Board member 2. Comments by City Manager 8:00 p.m. 3. Comments by Council Members 8:05 p.m. A. CROYA Updates – Alderman Moore 1 4. OPPORTUNITY FOR CITIZENS TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS 5. ITEMS FOR OMNIBUS VOTE CONSIDERATION 8:10 p.m. 1. Approval of the May 20, 2013 regular City Council minutes Copy of the minutes are attached beginning on page 8. 2. May check register Check Register For Period April 27 - May 24, 2013 Fund Invoice Payroll Total General 483,527 1,061,360 1,544,887 Water & Sewer 97,371 103,391 200,762 Parks & Recreation 162,855 317,631 480,486 Capital Improvements 203,115 721 203,835 Bond Funds - Projects 0 0 0 Motor Fuel Tax 0 0 0 Cemetery 5,107 17,908 23,015 Senior Resources 31,691 19,155 50,847 Deerpath Golf Course 76,661 42,151 118,812 Fleet 38,170 35,821 73,991 Debt Funds 1,500 0 1,500 Housing Trust 0 0 0 Park & Public Land 0 0 0 All other Funds 160,463 143,342 303,806 $ 1,260,460 $ 1,741,480 $ 3,001,940 3. Consideration of an Ordinance approving a Fee Schedule for The City of Lake Forest (First Reading and if desired by City Council, Final Approval) PRESENTED BY: Elizabeth Holleb, Finance Director (847-810-3612) PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Staff requests first reading and final approval of an Ordinance approving a modified fee schedule for The City of Lake Forest. 2 BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The City’s Auditor’s recently brought to staff’s attention a discrepancy between the fee schedule on file and adopted by Ordinance in late 2012, and the fees being charged at Deerpath Golf Course. A review of the file shows that the agenda packets for both the Parks and Recreation Board meeting of 10/9/12 and the City Council meeting of 11/19/12 provided language indicating that annual golf course membership fees would increase by 3.00% after February 15, 2013. The Fee Ordinance schedule previously approved by the City Council reflects fee increases between .99% and 1.05%, a discrepancy resulting from a staff error on the fee chart. Fees charged at the golf course since February 15, 2013, have been assessed at rates reflective of the 3.00% increase intended and approved by the Board and City Council. It is recommended that the City Council approve an Ordinance retroactively amending the fee schedule to reflect the fees consistent with the 3% increase communicated in written materials and substantiated by review of the Park Board meeting audio recording. BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT: The projected additional revenue associated with the increased fees was included in City Council material provided November 19, 2012 and December 3, 2012 and incorporated in the FY2014 annual budget. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Waive First Reading and grant final approval of the ordinance beginning on (page 18) approving a fee schedule for The City of Lake Forest. 4. Approval of 10% matching funds for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) American Firefighter Grant (AFG) Award Package for new Cardiac Monitor/Defibrillators for our Ambulances FY2014 STAFF CONTACT: JEFFREY HOWELL, FIRE CHIEF (810-3864) PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Staff is requesting City Council to approve 10% matching funds ($13,900) towards the AFG award for purposes of purchasing four (4) Cardiac Monitor/Defibrillators, replacing units which have been in place since 2005. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: In February 2013, the Fire Department received notification of being awarded a grant from the DHS/AFG grant program for the purchase of four (4) Cardiac Monitor/Defibrillators. This Grant was crucial in providing us with the opportunity to upgrade our cardiac monitors to the latest technology. All required bidding procedures were adhered to and the following bids were received. Company Bid Amount Zoll Medical – X Series $133,948.00 Physio Control – LIFEPAK 15v2 $133,147.40 Philips – MRx M3536A $95,037.74 CJPS Medical Systems – VitalPoint Pro $11,778.00 Zoll was the lowest responsive bidder with an overall favorable compliance with the bid specifications. Zoll’s X Series is compatible with our current auto pulse equipment and our crews have been using Zoll’s M Series for the past nine years. The X Series is compatible with all Automatic Difibrillators currently in use throughout the City’s facilities, such as the Recreation Center, Senior Center, Muncipal Services, Golf Course, Beach, and Elawa 3 Farm. Further, the X Series is compatible with the AEDs contained in the City’s Police Squad cars, Lake Bluff’s emergency response vehicles, and Northwestern Lake Forest Hospital. The remaining vendors did not comply with the required specifications and/or provide complete pricing information. Following is a brief description of the more notable instances of non-compliance. Physio Control’s LIFEPAK is unable to transmit 12-Leads into Northwestern Lake Forest Hospital Rescue net 12-Lead system. Displayed CPR performance feedback is not available as a standard feature and requires additional equipment and cost. Shipping and handling to and from Physio’s authorized repair facility is not covered. The City would be charged $185 in each instance. Philips’ MRx is unable to monitor SpCO, does not show underlying rhythm during CPR nor provide an artifact filter for CPR, and does not have the ability to read pre and post 12-Lead snapshots. Philips does not offer the 5-year warranty as requested, but rather a 2-year bench warranty. CJPS Medical Systems’ VitalPoint Pro is not a defibrillator device, and uses 5-Lead ECG, not 12-Lead. The monitor is not field serviceable and does not utilize Masimo SET/rainbow technology. In the response document, the account representative stated that while they understood their product was not a perfect match, they wanted us to be aware of their company and product. BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT: The Fire Department applied for this DHS AFG grant in 2012, but just received notice of award for replacement of our Cardiac monitors. Below is an estimated summary of Project budget: FY2014 Funding Source Amount Budgeted Amount Requested Budgeted? Y/N AFG Grant $13,900 $139,000 10% Match $13,900 Y RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve 10% matching funds for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) American Firefighter Grant (AFG) Award Package for new Cardiac Monitor/Defibrillators in the amount of $13,900. 5. Consideration of a Resolution Accepting Improvements in the Amberley Woods Development Located South of Route 60 and West of Conway Farms Drive. (Approval of Resolution) STAFF CONTACT: CATHERINE CZERNIAK, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (810-3504) 4 PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Council consideration of a Resolution accepting certain improvements in the Amberley Woods development is requested. The acceptance of certain improvements will allow the related financial securities to be released to the developer. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION In 2006, Lake Forest - Residential Homes of America. LLC, (RHA) acquired the northeast quadrant of the Amberley Woods development parcel and entered into agreements to complete certain improvements within the development. The plan approved for this portion of the development included two 45- unit condominium buildings. The first of the two buildings is complete and occupied. Due to economic conditions in the recent past, currently, there is no schedule for beginning construction on the second condominium building. The original approvals and agreements anticipated completion and some occupancy of both buildings prior to the City’s acceptance of water and sanitary sewer improvements. However, given the delay of the construction of the second building, at the request of RHA, and after review and evaluation of the completed improvements and after discussions with the City Attorney, a Resolution conditionally accepting certain improvements in the Amberley Woods development is presented to the City Council for consideration. The conditions of acceptance are detailed in Section Three of the Resolution and in summary include: delivery of as-built drawings; application of the final lift to Amberley Court, a private road; establishment of a reserve fund for future re- surfacing of Amberley Court by the Homeowners’ Association as detailed in the Resolution; extension of the landscape security for two years; and, payment of all outstanding fees and charges. The Resolution is included in the Council packet beginning on page 40. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve a Resolution conditionally accepting certain improvements in the Amberley Woods development. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the Omnibus items as presented. 6. ORDINANCES 8:35 p.m. 1. Consideration of a Recommendation from the Plan Commission to Accept the City of Lake Forest Bicycle Master Plan and to Approve a Related Amendment to The City of Lake Forest Comprehensive Plan. (Approve a motion to waive first reading of an Ordinance and if desired by the City Council, grant final approval.) PRESENTED BY MEGAN C. NEUMAN, PLANNER (810-3520) PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: On January 24, 2013, the Plan Commission unanimously recommended acceptance of the Bicycle Master Plan. In further support of the Master Plan, the Plan Commission also unanimously recommended approval of an amendment to the Transportation Chapter of The City of Lake Forest Comprehensive Plan incorporating the Bicycle Master Plan. 5 BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: This project was initiated in response to comments heard at Ward meetings. This project evolved into an effort to pro-actively identify safe bike routes within the community, work with neighboring communities and Lake County to explore connections to regional bike trails and to better position the City to receive grant funding for transportation and community development related projects in the future. The development of the Bicycle Master Plan was supported by community input through a public process that extended from fall 2011 to January 2013. The Bicycle Master Plan reviews the planning process used to develop the plan, reviews existing conditions and presents a proposed bicycle network of paths and roadways. The Master Plan also identifies ways to improve safety and encourage more people to bike in Lake Forest. Guidelines for signage, bicycle parking, and bicycle facilities are included in the Plan. The Bicycle Master Plan is a tool intended to: 1. Establish community priorities and increase awareness relating to bicycling; 2. Better position the City to take advantage of grant opportunities; 3. Provide input and help to guide future decisions about implementing various types of projects; and 4. Assure that planning for ongoing road improvement projects includes consideration of bicycle safety and amenities. To document the City’s interest and support of bicycling, the Plan Commission recommended that The City of Lake Forest Comprehensive Plan be amended to reflect the goals of the Bicycle Master Plan and to incorporate it by reference into the Comprehensive Plan to assure that the Bicycle Master Plan is considered in long term planning for the City. An Ordinance including the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan as recommended by the Plan Commission is included in the Council packet and can found on page 46. The complete Bicycle Master Plan is available on the City’s website, in the Council’s drop box and in hard copy by request. BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT: Acceptance of the Bicycle Master Plan and incorporation of the Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan does not commit the City to any expenditure of funds or initiate any specific projects. Instead, the Master Plan will provide a framework for considering projects that may be included in the City’s Capital Improvement Program in the future. In addition, the Master Plan puts the City in a strong position to receive grant funding in the future and could provide opportunities for public/private partnerships and partnerships with other municipalities, Lake County, the Forest Preserve and Lake Forest Open Lands as opportunities for regional bicycle connections are explored. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1. Approve a motion to accept The City of Lake Forest Bicycle Master Plan. 2. Waive first reading and grant final approval of an Ordinance amending The City of Lake Forest Comprehensive Plan as it relates to supporting bicycles in the community. 6 2. Consideration of an ordinance amending Section 2-65 of the City Code. PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: As a follow-up to the Council's recent approval of the City's liquor control ordinance, the Council is being asked to consider an amendment to the City Code incorporating training standards for Council members who wish to exercise the power to arrest. Under the City Charter, the Mayor and Aldermen are "conservators of the peace" with powers of arrest, but neither the Charter nor the City Code imposes any training standards. The Illinois Municipal Code was amended several years ago to impose training standards on any municipal official with the power to arrest, but such law did not apply specifically to Lake Forest because of its special charter status. The proposed ordinance (which is included in your agenda materials beginning on page 116 will align the City Code with State law. In addition, as discussed in the context of the liquor code amendment, this change in the City Code will allow aldermen (but not the Mayor) to have an interest in a liquor licensee, so long as such aldermen (a) do not have the power to arrest, and (b) do not vote or participate in any meeting, hearing, or decision relating to liquor control. Nothing in this ordinance would preclude an Alderman or the Mayor from exercising powers of arrest, but this ordinance would require proper training before such powers are to be exercised. RECOMMENDED ACTION: If the Council so desires, it would be appropriate to waive first reading and approve the ordinance amending Section 2-65 of the City Code. 7. NEW BUSINESS 8:45 p.m. 8. ADDITIONAL ITEMS FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION 8:50 p.m. 9. ADJOURNMENT 8:55 p.m. Office of the City Manager May 31, 2013 The City of Lake Forest is subject to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Individuals with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who require certain accommodations in order to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting, or who have questions regarding the accessibility of the meeting or the facilities, are required to contact City Manager Robert R. Kiely, Jr., at (847) 234-2600 promptly to allow the City to make reasonable accommodations for those persons. 7 The City of Lake Forest CITY COUNCIL Proceedings of the May 20, 2013 Regular Meeting 7:30 p.m. – City Hall Council Chambers CALL FOR ORGANIZATION OF THE 2013-2014 CITY COUNCIL Deputy City Clerk Margaret Boyer Administered the Oath of Office to: Mayor Elect - - Donald Schoenheider First Ward Alderman-Elect - - Catherine Waldeck Third Ward Alderman-Elect - - Jack Reisenberg Fourth Ward Alderman-Elect - - Michael Adelman Second Ward Alderman-Elect - - George Pandaleon was absent and will be sworn in at the June 2, 2013 meeting. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Mayor Schoenheider called the meeting to order at 7:45p.m. Deputy City Clerk Margaret Boyer called the roll of Council members. Present: Honorable Mayor Schoenheider, Alderman Novit, Alderman Waldeck, Alderman Moore, Alderman Tack, Alderman Reisenberg, Alderman Palmer. Absent: Alderman Pandaleon. Quorum present. Also present were: Robert Kiely, City Manager; Victor Filippini, City Attorney; Marlo DelPerico, City Attorney; Susan Banks, Communications Manager; Catherine Czerniak, Director of Community Development, Michael Thomas, Director of Public Works; Michael Thomas, Director of Public Works, Dan Martin, Superintendent of Public Works and Carina Walters, Assistant City Manager. There were approximately 45+ present in the audience. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all in attendance. Comments by Mayor Mayor Schoenheider took a moment to recognize former Mayor Waldeck and Mayor Swarthout, he thanked them both for their contributions to the community and for coming to this evening’s meeting. ELECTION AND APPOINTMENT OF CITY OFFICERS Mayor Schoenheider read off the following; Election by the City Council as Required by Charter and City Code City Treasurer Elizabeth A. Holleb City Supervisor Robert R. Kiely, Jr. City Attorney Victor Filippini 8 City Clerk Robert R. Kiely, Jr. City Surveyor and Engineer Gewalt Hamilton Associates Recommended Action: Appoint officers as required by City Charter and City Code. Alderman Palmer made a motion to appoint officers by City Charter and City Code, seconded by Alderman Reisenberg, motion carried unanimously by Voice vote. Reports of City Officers A. 2012-2013 New Board and Commission Appointments/Reappointments Mayor Schoenheider read off the following appointments and reappointments, with an addition to the Parks & Recreation Board where Curt Volkman was appointed as Chairman. BUILDING REVIEW BOARD NAME OF MEMBER APPOINT/REAPPOINT WARD Ross Freidman Appoint 4 Edward (Ted) Notz Appoint 2 Robert (Bob) Reda Appoint 1 Charlie King Appoint as Chairman 2 Michael Bleck Reappoint 4 CEMETERY COMMISSION NAME OF MEMBER APPOINT/REAPPOINT WARD Patrick Looby Appoint 4 Dennis O’Brien Appoint 1 Colin Silvester Reappoint as Chairman 3 CROYA NAME OF MEMBER APPOINT/REAPPOINT WARD Rebecca Quackenbush Reappoint LB Susan Beshilas Reappoint 2 Alana Hender Reappoint 3 Jim Thiel Reappoint 4 Jack Williams Appoint Student Martha Stride Appoint Student Annie Kotlarz Appoint Student 9 FIRE AND POLICE BOARD NAME OF MEMBER APPOINT/REAPPOINT WARD Steve Kernahan Appoint 2 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION NAME OF MEMBER APPOINT/REAPPOINT WARD Robert Alfe Appoint 4 Susan Athenson Reappoint 3 LEGAL COMMITTEE NAME OF MEMBER APPOINT/REAPPOINT WARD Ken Weinberger Appoint 2 Raymond Buschmann Reappoint as Chairman 4 LIBRARY NAME OF MEMBER APPOINT/REAPPOINT WARD Kate Bryant Appoint 1 Carol Champ REAPPOINT 1 PARKS & RECREATION BOARD NAME OF MEMBER APPOINT/REAPPOINT WARD Charles Kohlmeyer Appoint 4 PLAN COMMISSION NAME OF MEMBER APPOINT/REAPPOINT WARD Guy Berg Appoint 2 James Carris Reappoint 1 Lloyd Culbertson Reappoint 4 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS NAME OF MEMBER APPOINT/REAPPOINT WARD Richard Plonsker Appoint 2 Robert Franksen Appoint as Chairman 1 10 Recommended Action: Approve appointments recommended by Mayor Schoenheider Alderman Novit made a motion to approve appointments recommended by Mayor Schoenheider, seconded by Alderman Palmer, motion carried unanimously by Voice vote. Mayor Schoenheider then congratulated all Board and Committee members on their appointments and said he looks forward to working with them over the next two years. Cool Cities Environmental Leadership was removed from the agenda and been moved to the June 22nd meeting. Comments by City Manager Approval of International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) Contract between the City and the Lake Forest Firefighters/Lieutenants’ Bob Kiely, City Manager, introduced Director of Human Resources, DeSha Kalmar, who spoke to the Council about the IAFF renewal contract. The City and the IAFF negotiated a successor contract by not utilizing attorneys (until final review) for the negotiating process and came to tentative agreement in late April. The union ratified the tentative contract on May 6. It was reviewed by the PCA Committee this morning and tonight it is before the City Council for ratification. The duration of the contract is from May 1, 2013, through April 30, 2016. It includes retroactive pay increases, effective May 1, 2013. Alderman Novit commented that the contract was fair for all involved, Alderman Reisenberg asked if there were any major language changes, to which Desha Kalmar replied that there was only clarification to language in the agreement. Alderman Palmer made a motion to approve the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) Contract between the City and the Lake Forest Firefighters/Lieutenants’, seconded by Alderman Reisenberg. The following voted “Yea”: Aldermen Novit, Waldeck, Moore, Tack, Reisenberg, Palmer and Adelman. The following voted “Nay”: None. 7 Yea’s 0 Nay, Motion carried. Comments by Council Members A. Property and Public Land Committee 1. The Final Approval of the Gorton Operating Agreement was removed from the agenda and will be discussed at the June 3, 2013 meeting 2. Consideration of a Recommendation from the City’s Housing Trust Fund Board Recommending Approval of a Resolution in Support of a Long Term Plan for the Senior Cottages, Authorizing the 11 Release of a Reversion Clause for the Property and Authorizing the Acknowledgement of Full Satisfaction of the Obligations of Presbyterian Homes’ Special Use Permit. (Approval of Resolution) Director of Community Development, Catherine Czerniak, asked Tom Morsch, Chairman of the Housing Trust Fund Board, to speak to Council on the Resolution in support of a long term plan for the Senior Cottages. Mr. Morsch explained that this Resolution would facilitate transfer of the Senior Cottages and stabilize Senior Cottages long term. He added that when they were built, they were built with a large mortgage that needed subsidy to keep them affordable and at the same time provide monies for up keep. Over the years this became a struggle. This solution engages another Not for Profit Organization [Community Partners for Affordable Housing] which is leveraging a grant through IHDA via tax credits to pay down the mortgage, establish a revenue fund and keep the Cottages affordable for the future. Mr. Morsch asked Council for approval of the release of reversion clause. He also stated that the Housing Trust Board unanimously approves the transfer and would like to thank Tom Tropp, who spearheaded this project. Mr. Morsch went on to thank Alderman Moore as a member of Housing Trust, Lake Forest Bank and Trust, along with Catherine Czerniak, and Bob Kiely for helping facilitate a solution. Alderman Adelman stated that the Council recognizes and acknowledges Tom Tropps’ commitment and personal contributions in this endeavor. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve a Resolution in support of the Senior Cottages, authorizing the release of a reversion clause for the Property and authorizing the acknowledgement of satisfaction of the remaining Special Use Permit obligations of Presbyterian Homes. Alderman Novit made a motion to approve a Resolution in support of the Senior Cottages, authorizing the release of a reversion clause for the Property and authorizing the acknowledgement of satisfaction of the remaining Special Use Permit obligations of Presbyterian Homes, seconded by Alderman Moore. The following voted “Yea”: Aldermen Novit, Waldeck, Moore, Tack, Reisenberg, Palmer and Adelman. The following voted “Nay”: None. 7 Yea’s 0 Nay, Motion carried. Mayor Schoenheider thanked Tom Morsch for all his leadership and efforts in bringing everyone together to bring a positive solution, and once again a thanked Tom Tropp. 3. Approval of a Resolution declaring Wedgewood Lots #22, #23, #24 a surplus and Approving a 50 ft. Covenant on parcels #23 and #24 City Attorney, Victor Filippini, spoke on behalf of Staff who is requesting approval of a Resolution declaring the Wedgewood Lots #22, #23, #24 a surplus, identify a process in order to actively market the properties and approve a 50 ft. Covenant for each lot. As discussed, the City received these three lots as a gift and that the Council has the ability to dispose of this property if it so chooses. The PPL has reviewed the parcels and believes it is best to remove theses parcels from the City’s inventory of land. This resolution allows for: 1. Declare land as surplus, 2. Establish a means for disposition and 3. Impose covenants to be maintained with or without construction which provides visual and sound cover. 12 The City has received a number of inquiries from developers over the years expressing interest in the property. The sale of the lots would allow City Staff to reach out to those developers and bring possible offers to City Council. If there is no response, the City Manager would have the ability to retain a broker. There are current appraisals on the property. All offers would come before City Council unless they are at or above appraisal price so long as the City Manager can accept bids. Alderman Moore raised the question as to setbacks relating to the covenants. Director of Community Development, Catherine Czerniak, answered that the setback requirements are the same as our general requirement. RECOMMENDED ACTION: If appropriate and should the City Council desire, approve a Resolution declaring Wedgewood Lots #22, #23, #24 a surplus and Approving a 50 ft. Covenant on parcels #23 and #24. Alderman Moore made a motion to approve a Resolution declaring Wedgewood Lots #22, #23, #24 a surplus and approving a 50 ft. Covenant on parcels #23 and #24, seconded by Alderman Reisenberg. The following voted “Yea”: Aldermen Novit, Waldeck, Moore, Tack, Reisenberg, Palmer and Adelman. The following voted “Nay”: None. 7 Yea’s 0 Nay, Motion carried. 4. Approval of a Resolution relating to The City’s Right of First Refusal for the property known as, the YMCA Building in Market Square City Attorney, Victor Filippini, spoke on behalf of Staff who is requesting approval of a resolution relating to The City’s right of first refusal for the property noted above. In a document dated March 1982, The City of Lake Forest has the right of first refusal on the YMCA Building in Market Square should Market Square ever be sold. The City Attorney has been provided with notice that the property will be for sale, and added that the PPL Committee recommends this action with the Resolution, which waives the City’s right and permits the transfer of ownership to Market Square to proceed. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve a Resolution related to the City’s Right of First Refusal to the YMCA Building in Market Square Alderman Reisenberg made a motion to approve a Resolution related to the City’s Right of First Refusal to the YMCA Building in Market Square, seconded by Alderman Moore. The following voted “Yea”: Aldermen Novit, Waldeck, Moore, Tack, Reisenberg, Palmer and Adelman. The following voted “Nay”: None. 7 Yea’s 0 Nay, Motion carried. 5. Consideration of a Resolution Directing the Plan Commission to Review and Reconsider Previously Accepted Development Parameters for the City’s 10-Acre Laurel and Western Avenues Property (Approval of Resolution) Director of Community Development, Catherine Czerniak, asked Council to recommend a Resolution directing the Plan Commission to hold public meetings to review, reconsider, and if determined to be appropriate, recommend modifications to the Development Parameters for the City’s former Municipal Services site. The City Council accepted the “Development Parameters” for the City owned property 13 located at the northwest corner of Western and Laurel Avenues, the former Municipal Services site, in 2008. The Development Parameters were prepared after several months of study and public meetings by the ADHOC Western and Laurel Avenues Redevelopment Committee, a study group appointed by former Mayor Rummel in August, 2007. In recent months, the Property and Public Lands Committee of the City Council (the PPL) discussed this 10-acre parcel and debated the appropriate timing for renewing discussions about redevelopment of the property. The Committee also considered changes that have occurred both locally and regionally since 2008 when the Development Parameters were accepted and considered current development and market trends and acknowledged that these factors may, or may not, warrant modifications to the Development Parameters. A summary matrix of the parameters follows with a recommendation from the Property and Public Lands on particular items that should be the focus of the Plan Commission’s review. After discussion, the PPL determined that the time is right for reconsideration and recommends that the City Council direct the Plan Commission to undertake a review of the Development Parameters for the Laurel and Western Avenue site, revisit the basis upon which they were established, consider today’s market trends and invite public comment to hear the community’s current thoughts about the property. The PPL further recommends that the Council direct the Plan Commission to complete its review and report back to the City Council with a report and recommendation by September 1, 2013. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve a Resolution directing the Plan Commission to review and reconsider the Development Parameters for the City owned property located at the northwest corner of Laurel and Western Avenues. Alderman Novit asked about the reason for the recommendation, to which Catherine Czerniak explained that consultants have met and had preliminary conversations with developers. They would like to set up a dialogue with the Plan Commission. Alderman Adelman agreed that this is an opportunity for a discussion and that there will not be any relinquishing of guiding principles. Alderman Novit made a motion to approve a Resolution directing the Plan Commission to review and reconsider the Development Parameters for the City-owned property located at the northwest corner of Laurel and Western Avenues, seconded by Alderman Adelman. The following voted “Yea”: Aldermen Novit, Waldeck, Moore, Tack, Reisenberg, Palmer and Adelman. The following voted “Nay”: None. 7 Yea’s, 0 Nay, Motion carried. OPPORTUNITY FOR CITIZENS TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS None ITEMS FOR OMNIBUS VOTE CONSIDERATION 1. Approval of the May 6, 2013 regular City Council minutes 14 2. Award of Purchase for the Replacement of a One-Ton 4WD Pick-Up Truck for the Forestry Section Included in the F.Y. 2014 Capital Equipment Budget 3. Award of Purchase for the Replacement of a ½-Ton Extended Cab Pick-Up Truck for the Parks Section Included in the FY2014 Capital Equipment Budget 4. Award of Purchase for the Replacement of a One-Ton 4WD Pick-Up Truck for the Water & Sewer Section Included in the F.Y. 2014 Capital Equipment Budget 5. Consideration of Ordinances Approving Recommendations from the Building Review Board. (First Reading and if desired by the City Council, Final Approval) Mayor Schoenheider asked Council if they would like any item removed to be taken separately, and seeing none, asked for approval the five Omnibus items as presented. Alderman Palmer made a motion to approve the five Omnibus items as presented, seconded by Alderman Adelman. The following voted “Yea”: Aldermen Novit, Waldeck, Moore, Tack, Reisenberg, Palmer and Adelman. The following voted “Nay”: None. 7 Yea’s, 0 Nay, Motion carried. Information such as Purpose and Action Requested, Background/Discussion, Budget/Fiscal Impact, Recommended Action and a Staff Contact as it relates to the Omnibus items can be found on the agenda. ORDINANCES 1. Consideration of an Ordinance Amending The City of Lake Forest Liquor Code (Final Approval) City Attorney, Victor Filippini, spoke on behalf of Staff who is requesting final approval of an Ordinance amending the City’s Liquor Code. This Ordinance was approved for first reading at the March 18 meeting, with further discussion at the April 15 Council meeting and is now before Council with these minor modifications: The fee for a license has been removed from the Ordinance and placed on a fee schedule, the language around a limited liability corporations has been modified, language allowing the Liquor Commissioner the authority to waive annual fingerprinting on renewal licensing, language allowing the Liquor Commissioner the ability to extend the term of the license, language relating to state code prohibiting Alderman to be a part of an application, and allowance of a class D-1 license holders the opportunity to sell liquor [wine tasting] for off-site consumption limited to four times per year. A lengthy discussion by City Council occurred debating the language in the code relating to liquor sales at gas stations and its appropriateness in The City of Lake Forest. Alderman Palmer made a motion to approve the final reading of the Liquor code with amendments to the class D-1 license, the Aldermanic language, and to strike the language prohibiting liquor sales at gas stations, seconded by Alderman Adelman. The following voted “Yea”: Aldermen Novit, Moore, Tack, Palmer and Adelman. The following voted “Nay”: Alderman Waldeck. The Following abstained: Alderman Reisenberg. 5 Yea’s, 1 Nay, 1 abstention. Motion carried. 15 Andy Duran of LEAD and SPEAKUP addressed Council in opposition of liquor sales at gas stations. 2. Consideration of a Recommendation from the Plan Commission in Support of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 46, Section 10(E) of the City Code as it Relates to Fences in Ravines and on Bluffs (Final approval) Director of Community Development, Catherine Czerniak, stated that in February 2013, the City Council granted first reading of an Ordinance amending the Code to address fences in ravines and on bluffs. As a part of deliberation the Council raised questions about the proposed amortization period for existing fences. At the Council’s direction, the proposed amendment was redirected to the Plan Commission for reconsideration after approval of first reading. Specifically, the Commission reconsidered whether an opportunity for a variance should be provided. The Commission heard additional testimony generally in support of eliminating the requirement for existing fences to be removed so long as they remain in a stable and upright condition. At the conclusion of the public hearing and deliberation, the Plan Commission voted unanimously to recommend revisions to the proposed amendment, striking the provision requiring existing fences to be removed either after a specific time period or prior to a transfer of property ownership. The Commission retained language providing the opportunity for a variance from the prohibition of fences in ravines or on bluffs subject to consideration of specific criteria through the normal public review process. A discussion by City Council members occurred debating the length of time and amortization schedule, as well as the life expectance of a fence and hardscapes in the ravines. The resident of 261 Bluffs Edge, addressed Council on his displeasure of this ordinance since he had previously followed all the rules of the City in regards to constructing a fence. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Grant final approval of an Ordinance amending Chapter 46, Section 10(E) of the City Code pertaining to fences in ravines and on bluffs. Alderman Moore made a motion Grant final approval of an Ordinance amending Chapter 46, Section 10(E) of the City Code pertaining to fences in ravines and on bluffs with the Amendment to the amortization schedule to reflect 25 years and a provision that only such fences are to remain , seconded by Alderman Adelman. The following voted “Yea”: Aldermen Novit, Waldeck, Moore, Tack, Palmer and Adelman. The following voted “Nay”: Alderman Reisenberg. 6 Yea’s, 1 Nay, Motion carried. NEW BUSINESS None ADDITIONAL ITEMS FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION Alderman Adelman said that he received great feedback from the Community Forum on Native Planting and thanked John Sentell, John Mariani, Tricia Beckgeorge and Nathan Obleck from the Lake County Forest Preserve as well as Mary Van Arsdale. Mayor Schoenheider reminded all that Ward 1 meeting would be Thursday, May 23 from 7-8:30 and that Alderman Waldeck and Novit would lead it. 16 Alderman Tack reminded all that the Community Forum in October will be about Ravines. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business. Alderman Palmer made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Alderman Tack. Motion carried unanimously by voice vote at 10:35pm Respectfully Submitted, Margaret Boyer Deputy City Clerk 17 THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST ORDINANCE NO. _________ AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST WHEREAS, The City has established various fees and charges as part of its codes, ordinances, rules, regulations, and policies, which fees and charges are reviewed from time-to-time; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed such fees and charges, and hereby determines that it is necessary to adjust certain existing fees and charges, and/or to establish formally other fees and charges; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interests of the City and its residents to adopt this Ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, COUNTY OF LAKE, STATE OF ILLINOIS, as follows: SECTION ONE: Recitals. The foregoing recitals are incorporated as the findings of the City Council and are hereby incorporated into and made a part of this Ordinance. SECTION TWO: Approval of Fee Schedule. The City Council hereby approves the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit A (“Fee Schedule”). To the extent any provision of any code, ordinance, regulation, rule, or policy of the City is 18 contrary to the Fee Schedule, such provision is hereby deemed amended so that the Fee Schedule shall control. Any fee or charge not otherwise listed on the Fee Schedule shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. SECTION THREE: Effective Date of Fee Schedule. The fees and charges set forth on the Fee Schedule shall take effect as of the date noted on the Fee Schedule. To the extent that any fees or charges were imposed consistent with the Fee Schedule prior to the effective date of this Ordinance as set forth in Section Four hereof, such fees and charges so imposed are hereby approved and ratified. SECTION FOUR: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. Passed this ____ day of _________________________, 2013 AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Approved this __ day of _________________________, 2013 _____________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk 19 Exhibit A Schedule of Fees and Charges 20 The City of Lake ForestEffective May 1, 2013 or As NotedPROPOSEDFees and ChargesFY2014Amount $$% Projected Fund FY2014FEECHANGE Revenue1. Public WorksWater Utility Fees/ChargesTurn Off Water FeeWater75n/cTurn Off Water Fee After HoursWater100n/cTurn On Water FeeWater75n/cTurn On Water Fee After HoursWater100n/cWater Main Taps:Water1 InchWater500n/c1-1/2 InchWater1,000n/c2 InchWater1,300n/c3,4,6 and 8 inch tapsWater900n/c Water Meter Fees:Water3/4 InchWater470n/c1 InchWater540n/c1-1/2 InchWater910n/c2 InchWater1,165n/c3 inchWater2,615n/c4 inchWater3,950n/c6 inchWater6,840n/cPlant Investment Fee - SFWater2,900n/c Multi-Family Dwelling - new structureWater2,652n/c Residential pools, sprinkler systemsWater459n/c Nonresidential buildings - new structures and additionsWater1.02/sq ft of entire n/cWaterinterior area of the buildingn/c Institutional buildings - new structure and additions Water.94/sq ft of entire n/c only if eligible for fed and state tax exempt statusWaterinterior area of the buildingn/cGeneral FeesSticker for Leaf/Grass Bags General1.00 per stickern/cSanitation Special PickupGeneral $ 40 per cubic yardn/c White GoodsGeneral65n/c White Goods W/CFCGeneral90n/cExhibit A 6/3/13 City Council1 of 1921 The City of Lake ForestEffective May 1, 2013 or As NotedPROPOSEDFees and ChargesFY2014Amount $$% Projected Fund FY2014FEECHANGE RevenueLicensesScavengers - collects and disposes of multi-family and 1,500 per companyn/c commercial wasteScavengers - collects and disposes of residential and 750 per companyn/c commercial roll -offsScavengers - collection and cleaning of portable toilets200 per companyn/c2. Community DevelopmentWater Utility Fees/ChargesWater Service Inspection FeeWater50n/cHome Inspection FeeWater150n/cHome Inspection Fee - Re-InspectionWater50n/cGeneral FeesZoning AnalysisGeneral100n/cBuilding & Development Fees:Service Contracts:Lake BluffGeneralPer Agreementn/cBannockburnGeneral$5,000 min.n/c& 50% over that Plan Review :Remodeling up to $12,000General55n/c$12,001 to $48,000 RemodelingGeneral55n/c$48,001 - $120,000 RemodelingGeneral55n/cover $120,000 RemodelingGeneral55n/cAdditional fee for plan reviews that require more than 2 hoursGeneral$55 per additional hourn/cNew Construction - SFDGeneral400n/cNew Construction - 2FDGeneral230/unitn/cNew Const. - Com. & Multi. Fam.$572+$50/n/c 3 or more units1,000 Sq. Ft.n/cPlan Re-Submittal FeeGeneral$ 140 per re-submittaln/c 6/3/13 City Council2 of 1922 The City of Lake ForestEffective May 1, 2013 or As NotedPROPOSEDFees and ChargesFY2014Amount $$% Projected Fund FY2014FEECHANGE RevenueAlterations to Approved PlansGeneral$ 140 + $55 per hour feen/cfor reviewsn/crequiring more than 2 hoursn/cBuilding Scale Calculation FeesSingle Family residence - first reviewGeneral400n/c with completed Building Scale worksheet/detailed plansGeneral200n/cTwo-family dwellingGeneral$ 189 per unitn/c with completed Building Scale worksheet/detailed plansGeneral120n/c Additonal reviews (for revised plans)General102n/c On-site inspection for an existing dwellingGeneral102n/c Office meeting to discuss for building scale calculationGeneral50n/cBuilding Scale Waiver RequestGeneral100n/c Building Review Board FeesSigns/Awnings/Landscaping/ Lighting/FencesGeneral75n/cTwo or more of above General125n/cStorefront AlterationsGeneral100n/cNew Commercial building, school, hospital or multi-family buildingGeneral700n/c per buildingAlterations or major additions to commerical buildings, schools, General323n/c hopitals or multi-family buildings - per buildingNew multi-building projects - per buildingGeneral850 + 175 for more than n/c4 buildings (per building)n/cSatellite DishGeneral100n/cChanges to approved building materialsGeneral60n/cDemolition with replacement structureGeneral2,230n/cDemolition partial and replacement additionGeneral1,310n/cDemolition w/o Replacement StrutureGeneral1,310n/cReplacement/new single family home/duplex structure General1,310n/cVariance from Building Scale OrdinanceGeneral367n/cRevisions to Approved PlansGeneral225n/cHistoric Preservation Commission FeesDemolition (complete) and replacement structureGeneral2,450n/cDemolition (partial) and replacement structure General1,529n/c Removal of less than 50% 6/3/13 City Council3 of 1923 The City of Lake ForestEffective May 1, 2013 or As NotedPROPOSEDFees and ChargesFY2014Amount $$% Projected Fund FY2014FEECHANGE RevenueNew Residence on Vacant Property (building scale fee also)General1,050n/cAdditions & Alterations to Existing Residence (building scale fee also)General500n/cRevisions to Approved Plans General225n/cVariance from Building Scale OrdinanceGeneral367n/cRescission of local landmark designation, amendment of local landmark designation or historic map amendmentGeneral2,500n/cProject FeesRed Tag , per violation, per dayGeneral300n/cStop Work OrderGeneral750n/cStorage Tank - Removal SF and Duplex propertiesGeneralno fee permit issuedn/c Multi-family and Commercial propertiesGeneral200/tankn/cStreet Obstruction - first 30 lineal fee of public right-of-wayGeneral30n/cStreet Obstruction - for each 20 lineal feet or fraction therof in excess of 30 feetGeneral10n/cRe-Inspection all permits (failed/no show)General175n/cAdditional InspectionsGeneral50n/cOff Hour InspectionsGeneral$50 administration fee plus per hour cost of inspectorn/cConst. Codes Comm. Fees:Variances from Construction CodeGeneral250n/cAdministrative AppealsGeneral150n/cDemolition TaxCap Imp/12,000n/cAfford HsingZoning Board of AppealsVariations from Zoning CodcGeneral287n/cAdministrative AppealsGeneral150n/cSpecial Use Permit - Existing DevelopmentsGeneral655n/cLegal Ad Publication (as required)General50n/c Plan Commission 6/3/13 City Council4 of 1924 The City of Lake ForestEffective May 1, 2013 or As NotedPROPOSEDFees and ChargesFY2014Amount $$% Projected Fund FY2014FEECHANGE RevenueMinor Subdivisions-Tentative Approval 2,3 or 4 lots General2,184n/c payable at time of applicationMinor Subdivisions-Final ApprovalGeneral250+35/lot plusn/cengineering and recording feesn/cMajor Subdivisions-Tentative Approval 5 or more lotsGeneral$3,822+35 for eachn/cGenerallot over 5n/cMajor Subdivisions-Final approval paid prior to recording of platGeneral$400+35/n/cGeneralplus $5/lotn/cGeneralover 10; +n/cengineering and recording fees n/c Planned Preservation Subd Special Use Pemit plus minor/major subd feeGeneral2,500n/c Zoning ChangeGeneral3,328n/cFiling fee for all other developmentsGeneral788n/cCode AmendmentGeneral3,328n/cExtension of Tentative Subdivision Plat ApprovalGeneral150n/cAdministrative Property Line shiftGeneral250n/cLegal Ad Publication (as required)General50n/c PermitsBuilding Permits repair and maintenance under $6,000General30n/cBuilding Permits - $100,000 or lessGeneral1.5% of total constructionn/cGeneral(50 min)n/cBuilding Permits - over $100,000General2% of 1stn/cGeneral$200k;n/cGeneral1% of nextn/cGeneral$300 + .5%n/cGeneralover $501,000n/c Underground storage tank removal General$50 per tankn/c (single family and duplex) Hot workGeneral25n/c Permit ExtensionsGeneral$150 adminstration fee plus 20% of the orignaln/cpermit fee - 6 month extensionAdminstration DemolitionGeneral250n/c Driveway Permits: 6/3/13 City Council5 of 1925 The City of Lake ForestEffective May 1, 2013 or As NotedPROPOSEDFees and ChargesFY2014Amount $$% Projected Fund FY2014FEECHANGE RevenueResidential - new curb cutGeneral$50 per cutn/c resurface driveway - no change General25.00 per cutn/c reconfiguration or change of materialGeneral50n/c CommercialGeneral$500 + $50/n/cGeneralunitn/cMulti-FamilyGeneral$500 + $50/n/cGeneralunitn/cSign PermitsLightsGeneral$10/sq.ft.n/cNo LightsGeneral$5/sq.ft.n/cSatellite PermitGeneral100n/c Satellite dishGeneral1.5% of cost, 50 minn/cPlumbing Irrigation SystemsGeneral2.00 per headn/cGeneral$ 60 minn/cPlumbing - base chargeGeneral60+$5.50/fix.n/cRecording of Public Right-of-Way agreement General40n/c for sprinkler systemSanitary SewerGeneral$50 min + 1.00/ft over 50 ftn/cStorm SewerGeneral$50 min + 1.00/ft over 50 ftn/cStreet OpeningElectricalGeneral$100, plus $1 per unit beyond 100 total unitsn/cElectrical ServiceGeneral75n/cElectric - motorsGeneral$75 + .50 per horsepowern/cHVACResidential - New or replacement 1 or 2 unitsGeneral52n/c Each additional unitGeneral45n/c Duct workGeneral52n/cCommercial NewGeneral$52 per 1,500 n/cGeneralsq ft of floor arean/cCommerical - replacement of existing unitsGeneralsame as residentialn/c Sign General1.5% construction costn/cGeneral50 minn/cConstruction Trailer Permit (Commercial Construction Sites only)General$100 per monthn/c 6/3/13 City Council6 of 1926 The City of Lake ForestEffective May 1, 2013 or As NotedPROPOSEDFees and ChargesFY2014Amount $$% Projected Fund FY2014FEECHANGE RevenuePurchase of Parking Space per Zoning CodeGeneralto be set by City Council at the timen/cof approval based on market costsVending LicensesHealth -Restaurant (20 or Less)General250n/cHealth - Restaurant (21-99)General350n/cHealth - Restaurant (100 + Seats)General600n/cHealth - Itinerant RestaurantGeneral250n/cHealth - Food StoreGeneral100.00n/cHealth - Limited Food Store (selling candy)General50.00n/cFood Vendor (delivery)General$150/Veh.n/cMilk Vendor (delivery)General$100/Veh.n/cHealth - Milk StoreGeneral100n/cIce Vending Machine per machineGeneral110n/cFood Vending Machine per machineGeneral55n/cCandy Vending Machine per machineGeneral55n/cPop/Soft drink Vending Machine per machineGeneral55n/cMilk Vending Machine per machineGeneral55n/cTobacco vending machine per machineGeneral50n/cCard/Trinket Vending Machine per machineGeneral55n/cAmusement Machine per machineGeneral110n/cHVAC ContractorGeneral60n/cElectrical ContractorGeneral60n/cJuke BoxGeneral25n/cPool TableGeneral25n/cElevator Inspection FeeGeneralVariablen/cDVD Vending Machine LicenseGeneral110n/cTree and Vegetation RemovalApplication Review FeeGeneral$30n/cRemoval of Heritage TreeGeneral$ 40 per treen/cRemoval of tree 10" DBH or larger within the streetscape preservationGeneral$ 40 per treen/c area, the front yard or the corner side yardRemoval of trees or vegetation from a Conservation EasementGeneral$ 35 per 1 1/2 acre siten/cRemoval of trees froma Tree Preservation or No Disturbance areaGeneral$ 35 per treen/c 6/3/13 City Council7 of 1927 The City of Lake ForestEffective May 1, 2013 or As NotedPROPOSEDFees and ChargesFY2014Amount $$% Projected Fund FY2014FEECHANGE RevenueRemoval of trees or shrubs from any ravine or bluffGeneral$ 35 per 1 1/2 acre siten/cRemoval of trees or shrubs from a public right of wayGeneral$ 35 per 1 1/2 acre siten/c or other public propertyBondsPermit Renewal - for projects with estimated constructionGeneral13% of permit feen/c costs of $200,000 or less refundable upon completion of project within one yearPermit Renewal - for projects with estimated constructionGeneral17% of permit feen/c costs of more than $200,000 refundable upon completion of project within 18 monthsFire Protection Fees:Life Safety Plan Review Fee - New Constr/AdditionGeneral$ 500 min or .05 s.f.n/c includes all floorsLife Safety Plan Review Fee - Remodel/AlterationGeneral$ 60 min or .05 sfn/cincludes all areasFire Suppression Systems (Plan review and 2 inspections)Single Family/Duplex Residential NewGeneral$120 or .05 per s.f whichever is greatern/c Addition/AlterationGeneral$60 or .05 per s.f for scope of work arean/cwhichever is greater Flush/Pump testGeneralNo fee inspection (test)n/cCommercial/Multi Family NewGeneral$500 or .05 per s.f. whichever is greatern/c Addition/AlterationGeneral$250 or .05 s.f. for scope of work area whichever is greatern/c Specialized Suppression (FM 200, clean agent)General$150 per system ( in addition to above fees for the overall system)n/c Underground Flush TestGeneral75n/c Fire Pump TestGeneral175n/c Stand pipe riserGeneral100n/cFire Alarms 6/3/13 City Council8 of 1928 The City of Lake ForestEffective May 1, 2013 or As NotedPROPOSEDFees and ChargesFY2014Amount $$% Projected Fund FY2014FEECHANGE Revenue Single Family/Duplex ResidentialGeneral$75 or .05 per s.f. whichever is greatern/c Commercial/Multi Family - NewGeneral$75 or .05 per s.f. whichever is greatern/c Commercial/Multi Family - Addition/AlterationGeneral$75 or .05 per s.f. whichever is greatern/cInspections/Tests Annual Underground Flush testWater$75 + cost per gallon of water, at current rate asn/cestablished by the City Council, based on pipe size Annual Fire Pump TestWater$175 + cost per gallon of water, at current rate asn/cestablished by the City Council, based on pump sizeOther Hood and Duct Extinguishing System - NewGeneral$300 per systemn/c Hood and Duct Extinguishing System - AlterationGeneral$100 per systemn/c Altenative Letter of Credit ReviewGeneral$100 per reviewn/c Conditional Certificate of Occupancy (single family and duplex)General$200 per unitn/c Conditional Certificate of Occupancy (multi-family and commercial)General$250 or $25 per square foot, whichever is greater,n/cto a maximum of $1,5003. FinanceWater Utility Fees/ChargesWater Sales/1,000 Gallons Effective with Water Bills mailed on or after May 1, 2013 Lake ForestWater5.14n/c Del Mar WoodsWater7.06n/c Other Non resident usersWater7.06n/c Sewer Charge/1,000 Gallons (winter usage)Water1.16n/c Customer Charge - Water (Inside)5/8" to 1.5" meterWater$20/quartern/c2" to 4" meterWater$100/quartern/c6" and above meterWater$500/quartern/cCustomer Charge - Water (Outside)5/8" to 1.5" meterWater$25/quartern/c2" to 4" meterWater$110/quartern/c 6/3/13 City Council9 of 1929 The City of Lake ForestEffective May 1, 2013 or As NotedPROPOSEDFees and ChargesFY2014Amount $$% Projected Fund FY2014FEECHANGE Revenue6" and above meterWater$525/quartern/cCustomer Charge - Sewer5/8" to 1.5" meterWater$5/quartern/c2" to 4" meterWater$20/quartern/c6" and above meterWater$100/quartern/cBeach Parking FeeBeach Parking Temporary (R)General85n/c Temporary (NR)General910n/cParking PermitsResident-Full YearParking313n/cResident-MonthlyParking30/Monthn/cResident - UnlimitedParking1,000n/cEmployer Purchased-Full Yr. Parking180n/cEmployer Purchased-Monthly Parking20/Monthn/cNon-Resident-Full YearParking626n/cNon-Resident - MonthlyParking60/Monthlyn/cAn envelope of 10 tokensParking25n/cTelegraph Road Annual Parking Permit fka quarterly/dailyParking700n/cDaily Parking Fee-TelegraphParking3n/cDaily Parking Fee-All OtherParking3n/cLicensesCar , purchase on lineGeneral80n/cLt. Truck (under 8,000 lbs.) purchase on lineGeneral80n/cHeavyTruck (8,000+ lbs.) purchase on lineGeneral105n/cMotorcycles, purchase on lineGeneral40n/cCar and Lt TruckGeneral85n/cHeavyTruck (8,000+ lbs.)General110n/cMotocyclesGeneral45n/cSenior Citizen 65 and over Generalno discountn/cTransfersGeneral5n/cPenaltiesGeneral50%n/cDog LicenseGeneral10n/cCat LicenseGeneral10n/c 6/3/13 City Council10 of 1930 The City of Lake ForestEffective May 1, 2013 or As NotedPROPOSEDFees and ChargesFY2014Amount $$% Projected Fund FY2014FEECHANGE RevenueAuto Dealer LicenseGeneral50+20/Vehn/cDisabled vehicle sticker (circuit breaker)General45n/cReal Estate Transfer TaxCap Imp$4.00 per $1,000n/c4. Parks and RecreationGolf Course Fees/Charges:Seasonal Fees-Resident: effective February 15, 2013Class A -Adult SingleDPG1,2931,318 1.93%Class B -Adult ComboDPG2,2422,286 1.96%Class C -LimitedDPG960979 1.98%Class D -JuniorDPG577588 1.91%Class F - Senior CitizenDPG768783 1.95%Limited PlusDPG818834 1.96% Seasonal Fees (Non-Resident) effective February 15, 2013Class A -Adult SingleDPG1,7601,794 1.93%Class B -Adult ComboDPG2,5782,629 1.98%Class C -LimitedDPG1,0861,107 1.93%Class D -JuniorDPG641653 1.87%Class F - Senior CitizenDPG1,0741,095 1.96%Limited PlusDPG857873 1.87% Daily Fees-Resident: effective January 1, 2013Weekday-9DPG28n/cWeekday-18DPG42n/cSenior Citizen 18 (weekday)DPG36n/cWeekend 9 DPG32n/cWeekend -18 DPG50n/cWeekday TwilightDPG37n/cWeekend Twilight DPG39n/cDaily Fees-Non-Resident: effective January 1, 2013 6/3/13 City Council11 of 1931 The City of Lake ForestEffective May 1, 2013 or As NotedPROPOSEDFees and ChargesFY2014Amount $$% Projected Fund FY2014FEECHANGE RevenueWeekday.-9 DPG33n/cWeekday.-18DPG49n/cSenior Citizen 18 (weekday)DPG40n/cWeekend 9 DPG34n/cWeekend-18DPG54n/cLeague Play DPG23n/cWeekday Twilight DPG39n/cWeekend TwilightDPG41n/cPromotional Rounds (PNI and Others)DPG42n/cElectric Golf Carts: effective January 1, 20139 HolesDPG24n/c18 HolesDPG34n/c9 Holes Single RiderDPG12n/c18 Holes Single RiderDPG19n/c Range Balls Small BucketDPG4n/c . Large BucketDPG6n/c Double BucketDPG15n/c Promotional Cart (PNI and other)DPG27n/cPull cart - 9 holesDPG4n/cPull cart - 18 hoesDPG5n/cUSGA Handicap Fees - MembersDPG34n/cPermanent Tee Time - WeekendDPG300n/c Permanent Tee Time - HolidaysDPG50n/cRental ClubsDPG20n/c Locker - 18 inchDPG105n/c Locker - 12 inchDPG95n/c Park FeesPark Picnic Permits0 - 50 PeopleParks/Rec50n/c51 or more PeopleParks/Rec50n/c 6/3/13 City Council12 of 1932 The City of Lake ForestEffective May 1, 2013 or As NotedPROPOSEDFees and ChargesFY2014Amount $$% Projected Fund FY2014FEECHANGE RevenuePicnic TablesParks/Rec25 per tablen/cGrillsParks/Rec85 per grilln/cBoating and Beach Fees - effective February 1, 2013Boat Ramp/Sailboat Permits-RecreationBoat Ramp (R)Parks/Rec424n/c Boat Ramp 2nd boat/ half seasonParks/Rec212n/c Boat Ramp (R) (Sen.) Parks/Rec318n/c Boat Ramp (R) (Sen) 2nd boat/ half seasonParks/Rec159n/c Boat Ramp (NR) Parks/Rec2,692n/c Year round storage ResidentParks/Rec1,882n/c Year round storage Resident seniorParks/Rec1,234n/c Year round storage non-residentParks/Rec5,666n/c Seasonal Boat Storage ResidentParks/Rec1,273n/c Seasonal Boat Storage Resident SeniorParks/Rec865n/c Seasonal Boat Storage Non-residentParks/Rec4,814n/c Winter Sailboat Storage (R) Parks/Rec668n/c Winter Sailboat Storage (R) SeniorParks/Rec668n/c Winter Sailboat Storage (Nonresident)Parks/Rec2,409n/c Sailboat Racks ResidentParks/Rec410n/c Sailboat Racks Resident SeniorParks/Rec313n/c Sailboat Racks Non-residentParks/Rec2,417n/c South Beach Parking Permit (R)Parks/Rec123n/c South Beach Parking Permit (R) (Sen.)Parks/Rec92n/c South Beach Parking Permit (NR)Parks/Rec1,511n/c South Beach Parking Permit Employee/RetireeParks/Rec84n/c Extra vehicle decal resident - center isleParks/Rec123n/c Extra vehicle decal senior - center isleParks/Rec92n/c Extra vehicle decal nonresident - center isleParks/Rec1,511n/c Daily Boat Launch residentParks/Rec38n/c Daily Boat Launch nonresidentParks/Rec60n/c Winter Sailboat Rack StorageParks/Rec101n/c Resident Guest Daily Parking Pass, limit 5 per seasonParks/Rec10n/cNanny Parking PassParks/Rec85n/cSenior Caregiver Parking PassParks/Rec85n/cNon resident beach fee, weekends and holidaysParks/Rec10n/c 6/3/13 City Council13 of 1933 The City of Lake ForestEffective May 1, 2013 or As NotedPROPOSEDFees and ChargesFY2014Amount $$% Projected Fund FY2014FEECHANGE RevenueFitness Center Fees - effective May 1, 2013Fitness Center Membership FeesIndividual resident rateParks/Rec353n/cIndividual resident rate - 6 monthsParks/Rec243n/cIndividual resident rate - 3 monthsParks/Rec181n/cIndividual non-resident rateParks/Rec423n/cIndividual non-resident rate - 6 monthsParks/Rec314n/cIndividual non-resident rate - 3 monthsParks/Rec217n/cCouple resident rateParks/Rec551n/cCouple resident rate - 6 monthsParks/Rec441n/cCouple resident rate - 3 monthParks/Rec270n/cCouple non-resident rateParks/Rec662n/cCouple non-resident rate - 6 monthsParks/Rec553n/cCouple non-resident rate - 3 monthsParks/Rec324n/cFamily resident rateParks/Rec772n/cFamily resident rate - 6 monthsParks/Rec662n/cFamily resident rate - 3 monthsParks/Rec357n/cFamily non-resident rateParks/Rec925n/cFamily non-resident rate - 6 monthsParks/Rec816n/cFamily non-resident rate - 3 monthsParks/Rec430n/cSenior resident rateParks/Rec265n/cSenior resident rate - 6 monthsParks/Rec182n/cSenior resident rate - 3 monthsParks/Rec136n/cSenior non-resident rateParks/Rec317n/cSenior non-resident rate - 6 monthsParks/Rec235n/cSenior non-resident rate - 3 monthsParks/Rec163n/cSenior couple resident rateParks/Rec413n/cSenior couple resident rate - 6 monthsParks/Rec331n/cSenior couple resident rate - 3 monthsParks/Rec203n/cSenior couple non-resident rateParks/Rec497n/cSenior couple non-resident rate - 6 monthsParks/Rec415n/cSenior couple non-resident rate - 3 monthsParks/Rec243n/cStudent resident rateParks/Rec269n/cStudent non-resident rateParks/Rec323n/cMatinee resident rateParks/Rec178n/cMatinee non-resident rateParks/Rec212n/cAll-inclusive - member - effective December 6, 2012Parks/Rec279n/c 6/3/13 City Council14 of 1934 The City of Lake ForestEffective May 1, 2013 or As NotedPROPOSEDFees and ChargesFY2014Amount $$% Projected Fund FY2014FEECHANGE RevenueAll-inclusive - non-member - effective December 6, 2012Parks/Rec620n/c 5. OCMGeneral Fees & Charges:Birth certificates (January 1, 2010)General$10 first/$4 additionaln/cDeath certificates (January 1, 2013)General$14 first/$6 additionaln/c On-line data entry fee by city staff ( January 1, 2010)General10n/cPassport General30n/cSolicitors PermitGeneral$40n/cSolicitors PermitGeneral$30n/cLicensesRaffle LicenseGeneral25n/cTobacco LicenseGeneral125n/cLandscapte License (March 1 to Feb 28)General100n/cAlcoholic and Beverages:Class A-1General2,700n/cClass A-2General1,500n/cClass A-3General275n/cClass B-1General2,500n/cClass C-1General2,600n/cClass C-2General3,000n/cClass C-3General800n/cClass D-1General2,500n/cClass E-1General3,000n/cClass F-1General100n/cClass F-2General175 for each 24 hour period or any part thereofn/cClass F-3General100 for each 24 hour period or any part thereofn/cClass F-4General500 per vendor for the duration of the durationn/cof the sporting eventClass F-5General1,100n/cClass F-6General600n/cClass G-1General200n/c 6/3/13 City Council15 of 1935 The City of Lake ForestEffective May 1, 2013 or As NotedPROPOSEDFees and ChargesFY2014Amount $$% Projected Fund FY2014FEECHANGE RevenueClass G-2General600n/cClass H-1General600n/cClass H-2General1,100n/cClass I-1GeneralNonen/cAnnual RenewalGeneral150 renewal existing or change in owners or officersn/cApplication FeeGeneral300 new licensen/cImpact FeesLibraryLibrarysee ordinanceFire and Emergency ServicesGeneralsee ordinancePark SitePPLsee ordinancePark DevelopmentPPLsee ordinancePoliceGeneralsee ordinancePublic WorksGeneralsee ordinanceSchool District 67 (information only)pay Schoolsee ordinanceHigh School District 115 (information only)pay Schoolsee ordinance6. PoliceGeneral Fees & Charges:Bank ID Card FeeGeneral25n/cAdult Finger Print Fee Resident or EmployeeGeneral25n/c Non-residentGeneral200n/cLicensesTaxicab General50n/cTaxicab Driver General50n/cTaxi Business License (paid at City Hall) NewGeneral100n/c RenewalGeneral100n/cFines & Penalties:Overtime Parking - LotGeneral$15/25/50n/cImproper Parking - LotGeneral15/25/50n/cParking in Prohibited Area- LotGeneral15/25/50n/c 6/3/13 City Council16 of 1936 The City of Lake ForestEffective May 1, 2013 or As NotedPROPOSEDFees and ChargesFY2014Amount $$% Projected Fund FY2014FEECHANGE RevenueOvertime Parking - OtherGeneral$15/25/50n/c Improper Parking - OtherGeneral15/25/50n/cParking in Prohibited Area- OtherGeneral15/25/50n/cParking at Boat RampGeneral125/150/175n/cNo Vehicle LicenseGeneral75/100/125n/cNo parking east of Sheridan RoadGeneral125/150/175n/cNo Animal LicenseGeneral15/25/50n/cDog-At-LargeGeneral40/55/70n/cCode ViolationsGeneralvariablen/c Motor Code ViolationsGeneralvariablen/c Dog BarkingGeneral15/25/50n/cLeaf BurningGeneral15/25/50n/cHandicapped ParkingGeneral250n/cDog Public NuisanceGeneral100/500/750n/cBurglar Alarm Fees General0/50/100/250n/c7. FireGeneral Fees & Charges:Ambulance-Resident ALS transportGeneral587.40n/cAmbulance-Resident ALS2 transportGeneral703.98n/cAmbulance-Resident BLS transportGeneral524.40n/cAmbulance-Non Resident ALS transportGeneral735.63n/cAmbulance- Non Resident ALS2 transportGeneral903.98n/cAmbulance-Non Resident BLS transportGeneral666.74n/cAmbulance - MileageGeneral6.05 per milen/c8. EngineeringSewer System Connection Fee Single Family Dwelling825n/c Two - family Dwelling825 per unitn/c Multi-family Dwelling165 per population equivn/c1,650 min Non-Residential Buildings165 per population equivn/c1,650 min 6/3/13 City Council17 of 1937 The City of Lake ForestEffective May 1, 2013 or As NotedPROPOSEDFees and ChargesFY2014Amount $$% Projected Fund FY2014FEECHANGE Revenue Institutional buildings with Fed and State tax exempt status825/connectionn/cSite GradingSite Grading - New construction500n/cIf no grading, request may be submitted for a waiver of the requirement of 100n/c grading planResubmittal125n/cRevisions to approved grading plans125n/cTree fencing inspection fee125n/cSite grading security (financial guarantee - refundable)3,000 per acre of developmentn/cWater Shed Development Fee: Revised Fee ScheduleGeneral FeesSediment and Erosion Control Only Single Family Residential Lot (See site grading ordinance)see ordinancen/c Single Family Residential Lot (within regulatory floodplain)750n/c Development (<10 acres)850n/c Development ( ≥ 10 acres)1,000n/cMinor Development Without detention2,000n/c With detention or Fee - in - lieu3,000n/cMajor Development With detention or Fee-in-lieu 4,500n/c Within regulatory floodplain ( < 10 acres)3,000n/c Within regulatory floodplain (≥ 10 acres)4,000n/cWetland Fees Category I Wetland impacts less than or equal to 1 acre500 + appropriate General feen/c Category II Wetland impacts greater than 1 acre and less than 2 acres750 + appropriate General feen/c Category III Wetland impacts greater or equal to 2 acres or impacts a HQAR1,000 + appropriate General feen/c Category IV Wetland impacts involving either restoration, creation500 (< 1 acre) + applicable Gen feen/c or enhancement1,000 (≥ 1 acre) + applicable Gen feen/cResubmittal fee1/3 of total Watershed Permit Fee/each resubmittaln/cEarth Change Approval1,000 + applicable Watershed Permit Feen/cSecurities - financial guarantee refundable3,000 per acre of developmentn/cVariances2,200 + applicable Watershed Permit Feen/c 6/3/13 City Council18 of 1938 The City of Lake ForestEffective May 1, 2013 or As NotedPROPOSEDFees and ChargesFY2014Amount $$% Projected Fund FY2014FEECHANGE RevenueAppeals550 + applicable Watershed Permit Fee n/cFlood Plain Analysis and Report35n/cConstruction Engineering Standards Manual35n/c9. Senior ResourcesMembership Dues Residents of Lake Forest, Lake Bluff and unincorporated Lake Forest and Lake BluffSenior Resources$35 per personn/c$55 per familyn/c Outside of Lake Forest and Lake BluffSenior Resources$45 per personn/c$65 per familyn/c Circuit Breaker participants Lake Forest and Lake BluffSenior Resources$10 per personn/c residents only$15 per familyn/cCar and Bus ridesSenior Resources$3/fee each directionn/c$6 round tripn/cTaxi subsidy- Lake Forest and Lake Bluff residentsSenior Resources16 coupons/monthn/c living within the Lake Forest High School District for a value of $3/eachn/c 6/3/13 City Council19 of 1939 40 41 42 43 44 45 BICYCLE MASTER PLAN CONNECT . ENCOURAGE . STRUCTURE Accepted by the Accepted by the Lake Forest City Council onLake Forest City Council on DRAFTDRAFT 46 BLANK PAGE DRAFT PLAN MARCH 2013 47 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The City of Lake Forest appreciates the efforts and hard work of the numerous residents, staff, and other bicycle enthusiasts who participated in the creation of the Bicycle Master Plan. The energy, creativity and thoughtfulness of the public was integral to the planning process. In particular, the following residents, staff, and other agency members participated regularly in the development of the Plan. CITY OF LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL RESIDENT FOCUS GROUP CITY OF LAKE FOREST BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS • Park and Recreation Board • Plan Commission PARTNER A GENCIES Valbona Kokoshi – Lake County Department of Transportation George Russell – Village Engineer, Village of Lake Bluff John Sentell – President, Lake Forest Open Lands Association Brandon Stanick – Assistant Village Administrator, Village of Lake Bluff City of Lake Forest PROJECT T EAM Bob Ells – Project Engineer Craig Lepkowski – Police Commander Chuck Myers – Parks Superintendent Megan Neuman – Project Lead, Planner Goran Radovanovic – Planning Intern 48 BLANK PAGE DRAFT PLAN MARCH 2013 49 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION ONE Background: A Tour of the Bicycle Master Plan • Beneﬁ ts of a Master Plan • Purpose • Planning Process • Goals and Objectives SECTION TWO Framework: Gearing Up For Bikes • Existing Conditions • Analysis of Public Input • Proposed Bicycle Network • Toolbox of Bicycle Facilities • Application of Bicycle Facilities SECTION THREE Bicycle Tune Up: Bike Friendly Planning • Engineering Priorities • Education • Encouragement • Enforcement and Trafﬁ c Safety • Evaluation and Planning SECTION FOUR Appendices • Appendix A: Community Survey Summary • Appendix B: Resources • Appendix C: Deﬁ nitions • Appendix D: Engineering Priorities 50 BLANK PAGE DRAFT PLAN MARCH 2013 51 BACKGROUND: A TOUR OF THE BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • Beneﬁ ts of a Master Plan • Purpose • Planning Process • Goals and Objectives SECTION ONE 52 PAGE | 2 DRAFT SECTION ONE: BACKGROUND Beneﬁ ts of a Master Plan Bicycling has always been a popular recreational activity for youth and adults alike. Recently, bicycling as an active mode of transportation has gained more support and popularity. Increasing awareness of the beneﬁ ts of physical activity and the negative impacts of automobiles on the environment has led local municipalities to adopt complete street policies and bicycle master plans. Creation of these plans not only addresses growing environmental and personal health concerns, but also provides alternative transportation options for residents and visitors to encourage a mode-shift from vehicle to bicycle. See Figure 1. The City of Lake Forest Bicycle Master Plan identiﬁ es a recommended bicycle network and establishes short and long term priorities to facilitate bicycle connectivity in the community. The Master Plan provides an opportunity to connect to regional trails and close the gaps within the existing system by creating a framework for future improvements. Improved bicycling conditions will encourage residents and visitors to ride bikes for recreational and utilitarian use. The implementation of this plan will provide residents and visitors to Lake Forest the opportunity to explore the city through a well-connected bike network. If effectively implemented, the Bicycle Master Plan will produce numerous beneﬁ ts including improved road safety, public health, air quality, reduced street congestion and long term cost savings for capital improvements. As Lake Forest is an historic community with established tree-lined streets, the following plan works to integrate on-road bike routes wherever possible to provide effective solutions and preserve the community character. This plan also provides the backbone for Lake Forest to apply for grant funding and national recognition as a Bicycle Friendly Community through the League of American Bicyclists showcasing Lake Forest as a destination for not only shopping, architecture, and history, but bicycling as well. The Bicycle Master Plan provides an opportunity for coordination between City Departments and regional partners as infrastructure projects are proposed. Similar to policies already implemented at the County and State level that require an evaluation for complete streets, the Bicycle Master Plan can serve as a reminder that all capital improvements should consider bicycle facilities as funding becomes available, consistent with this plan. 53 PAGE | 3DRAFT SECTION ONE: BACKGROUND Purpose The purpose of the Lake Forest Bicycle Master Plan is to provide a clear framework and establish priorities for future bicycle facilities as part of an update to the Transportation section of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The Bicycle Master Plan strives to provide safe connectivity throughout Lake Forest for the “casual adult rider” to encourage people to travel by bike more and drive less. Realization of the plan will position Lake Forest to become a bicycle friendly community and increase bicycle use in Lake Forest by creating a network of bike routes and trails within the community, facilitating connections to regional trails and providing essential infrastructure to support bicycling such as installing ample bicycle parking near key destinations and utilizing pavement markings on existing roads to direct cyclists and motorists. Interested But Concerned Conﬁ dent & Enthusiastic Strong & Fearless Not Interested Typical U.S. City is comprised of: 60%30% 9% Will not bike regardless of improvements Will bike regardless of road conditions Will bike with good road conditions Needs encouragement & support CNS1% The Bicycle Master Plan targets the resident who is interested in cycling more but is concerned with safety and may not be comfortable riding on streets where vehicles are present. Studies have shown that simple enhancements to a road can greatly improve the perceived safety of a route for bicyclists. On average, 40% of automobile trips are less than 2 miles. Numerous destinations in Lake Forest fall within this radius for many residents and can become more accessible by bike if the proper tools are implemented on the streets. FIGURE 1: TYPICAL CYCLIST CLASSIFICATION Source: League of American Bicyclists (Presentation at Bike Summit 2010) 54 PAGE | 4 DRAFT SECTION ONE: BACKGROUND Planning Process Based on input received at Ward meetings in the ﬁ rst quarter of 2011, the City Council directed staff to facilitate and prepare a Bicycle Master Plan for Lake Forest. In an effort to pro-actively identify safe bike routes within the community and explore connections to regional bike trails, the development of a Bicycle Master Plan is the ﬁ rst phase of a multi-phased project. Recognizing that bicycling is not conﬁ ned to the city limits, and consistent with ongoing efforts to share resources with neighboring communities, the City of Lake Forest coordinated efforts on the Bicycle Master Plan with the Village of Lake Bluff. The planning phase included community input through a public process. Together with Lake Bluff, the public planning process was an opportunity for members of both communities to come together to discuss bicycling within and through the two communities and discuss ways to improve bicycle safety and awareness. PUBLIC INPUT In order to gauge the level of bicycling that occurs in Lake Forest and Lake Bluff and to gain a better understanding of what challenges and issues are perceived by residents, electronic community surveys were conducted at the beginning of the process. Residents and non-residents who bike through or to Lake Forest and Lake Bluff were encouraged to participate in the surveys. Between August and November, 2011, more than 350 residents and cyclists in Lake Forest responded to the online surveys. A summary of the survey results is included as part of the Appendix to this report. Over 60 residents of Lake Forest and Lake Bluff participated in two public workshops to assist staff in gathering data for the plan. Participants worked together at tables of 5-6 people to identify key local destinations, desired regional connections, hazards and dream routes for bicycling in Lake Forest and Lake Bluff. The information gathered at the public workshops was incorporated into this plan and served as the impetus for evaluating key routes within the community for appropriateness and bicycle compatibility. Input was also received from the Lake Forest Parks and Recreation Board and a Public Open-House session where residents and bike enthusiasts came together to review the draft plan and provide comments on the Bicycle Master Plan. Key observations from the public workshops are identiﬁ ed in Figure 2. City of Lake Forest Public Workshop, January 30, 2012 55 PAGE | 5DRAFT SECTION ONE: BACKGROUND INFRASTRUCTURE The residential streets in Lake Forest generally have a low trafﬁ c volume and rank high on the Bicycle Level of Service. Lake Forest has two excellent and well- used north-south bike trails but is lacking in east and west connections. There are several key streets with higher trafﬁ c counts and speeds that could beneﬁ t from improvement to increase compatibility with bicycling. Existing Asset - Skokie Valley Bike Path along a ComEd easement Low trafﬁ c residential streets are a good choice for bicyclists FIGURE 2: KEY OBSERVATIONS PERCEIVED SAFETY Lake Forest has a low number of reported bike crashes. However, limited visibility and unpredictable behavior of cyclists are identiﬁ ed hazards in the community. Improving conditions to encourage bicycling in the community is desired. Road maintenance was identiﬁ ed as important to encouraging residents to ride through Lake Forest. Poor pavement conditions reduce the bicycle level of service and put cyclists and motorists at risk. Need identiﬁ ed to improve visibilty of cyclists in Central Business District Poor road conditions become hazards for a bicyclist WAY -FINDING Lake Forest has numerous local destinations accessible by bike. To encourage a mode shift for short trips, an identiﬁ ed network and signage will help direct cyclists around town. Way-ﬁ nding signs can also beneﬁ t local businesses and promote Lake Forest as a destination for visitors traveling on bike. Connections to existing trails are difﬁ cult to follow Signage could be improved to help designate bicycle routes 56 PAGE | 6 DRAFT SECTION ONE: BACKGROUND Goals & Objectives GOAL 1 - AWARENESS • Adopt the Bicycle Master Plan as the guiding document relating to bicycle improvements in Lake Forest. • Educate bicyclists and motorists on how to “share the road”. • Through the above efforts, become recognized as a “Bicycle Friendly Community” by the League of American Bicyclists. • Implement on-road bicycle facility improvements and signed bicycle routes in Lake Forest. • Consider bicycle connections to regional trails and local destinations as part of new development plans and neighborhoods in Lake Forest. • Collaborate with regional partners to evaluate future bicycle facilities on state routes within the city limits of Lake Forest and connections to surrounding communities. • Facilitate the creation of “Bike to Metra” maps and brochures to promote bicycling in Lake Forest as a valid mode of transportation for people visiting and working in Lake Forest. GOAL 2 - CONNECTIVITY • Achieve a Bicycle Level of Service rating of C or higher on residential streets. • Create a safe environment for all users of the roadways and trails. • Provide safe east-west bicycle connections in Lake Forest. • Maintain a low number of bicycle crashes and injuries for all ages. • Enforce trafﬁ c rules for bicyclists and motorists in accordance with Lake Forest Police standards and practices. • Provide safe riding instruction through local community organizations. GOAL 3 - SAFETY To generate awareness and acceptance of bicycling in Lake Forest. To connect major destinations within Lake Forest and facilitate access to the established regional network. To provide safe transportation options for people of all ages and physical abilities in Lake Forest. 57 PAGE | 7DRAFT SECTION ONE: BACKGROUND • Support healthy lifestyles and active transportation by promoting a bicycle friendly community. • Encourage use of the bike network for utilitarian and recreational purposes. • Provide basic information to the public regarding bicycle opportunities and the health beneﬁ ts of increased physical activity. • Install new bike parking racks in Lake Forest at key destinations. • Reduce car emissions in Lake Forest by encouraging short trips of less than 2 miles to be completed by bicycle. • Provide marked routes for bicyclists to establish a safe and sustainable trainsportation option to get to key destinations. • Identify and encourage adoption of policies that require future development and capital projects to include bicycle connections when possible. • Enhance public transportation hubs at the East and West Lake Forest train stations with safe bicycling thoroughfares and directional signage to key destinations. GOAL 5 - ENVIRONMENT GOAL 4 - HEALTH & WELLNESS To promote bicycling as a healthy, safe, convenient and enjoyable means of transportation and recreation. To protect the environment for the long term by promoting bicycling as a viable and sustainable transportation choice in Lake Forest. 58 BLANK PAGE DRAFT PLAN MARCH 2013 59 FRAMEWORK: GEARING UP FOR BIKES • Existing Conditions • Analysis of Public Input • Proposed Bicycle Network • Toolbox of Bicycle Facilities • Application of Bicycle Facilities SECTION TWO 60 PAGE | 10 DRAFT SECTION TWO : FRAMEWORK Existing Conditions RECREATIONAL T RAILS The City of Lake Forest is fortunate to have two major, paved north-south bike trails within the City limits as well as an unpaved recreational trail through the Middlefork Savanna. The North Shore Bike Path is the primary east- west connection for the surrounding area but becomes a gravel trail west of Waukegan Road. Existing bike paths and designated bicycle routes are shown in Figure 3. The Robert McClory Bike Path is located adjacent to the Union Paciﬁ c North Line Metra tracks on the east side of Lake Forest. This path enters Lake Forest at Old Elm Road to the south and continues north, through the Lake Forest Central Business District, past Park Avenue into Lake Bluff and on to Wisconsin. The Robert McClory Bike Path has 12 access points in Lake Forest. The Skokie Valley Bike Path is located within a ComEd easement along Highway 41, a major limited access roadway that bisects the City of Lake Forest. The path enters Lake Forest near Old Mill Road and continues north into Lake Bluff. The Skokie Valley Bike Path has 4 access points in Lake Forest and 1 in Lake Bluff at Route 176. When compared to the Robert McClory Bike Path in Lake Forest, access to the Skokie Valley Bike Path is limited. The Middlefork Savanna Trail is a 4.5 mile, packed gravel trail through the Middlefork Savanna. Access points to this trail can be found at Elawa Farm, a local destination, and from the residential streets in the Newells Reserve Subdivision and Route 176. The North Shore Bike Path runs parallel to Route 176 on the south side of the road. The Middlefork Savanna Trail, Skokie Valley and Robert McClory Bike Paths connect to this trail. The North Shore Bike Path further connects Lake Forest with cities located to the west as well as to the Des Plaines River Trail, a popular recreational bike trail in the region. ROADWAYS In general, consistent with resident observations from the survey, the smaller neighborhood streets appear to be suitable for bicycling for the majority of bicyclists; however, well-marked on-road shared bike facilities are presently non-existent in Lake Forest. An evaluation of the existing road network was completed by City staff including several suggested routes generated from public input and the Resident Focus Group. The evaluation summarized in Figure 4, was completed using the Bicycle Level of Service (BLOS) tool developed by the League of Illinois Bicyclists (LIB). The BLOS tool uses average daily trafﬁ c count, road widths, pavement conditions, speed limits and other Robert McClory Bike Path in Lake Forest showing the wooded character and amenities along the path. Routine maintanence is needed to address overgrown bushes and trail hazards. 61 PAGE | 11DRAFT SECTION TWO : FRAMEWORK FIGURE 3: EXISTING BIKE TRAILS AND DESIGNATED ROUTES ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !# # # # # # #Trail WayHill St North Ave Old TrlDato AveUniversity AveBroa dle y 's CtW Old Mill RdI 94N RT 4 1 S RT 41 S RI DGE RDW EVERETT RD N WESTERN AVEGREEN BAY RDN SHERIDAN RDS OAK KNOLL DRE ILLINOIS RD BUENA R D E D E ER PA TH E WESTLEIGH RD S GREEN BAY RDN MCKINLEY RDS VALLEY RD W WESTLEIGH RD S BEVERL Y P L W OLD ELM RD C STS TIMBER LNPARK LN S ESTATE LND STMUIR AVE F O S T E R A V E E CENTER AVE A R B OR DR E NORTH AVE W CONWAY RD E W O O D L A N D R D N WASHINGTON RDS HU N TER LNAC ADEMY RDW MELLODY RD S WAVELAN D RDSMITH AVE H STW GAGE LN E BLODGETT AVE N OAKWOOD AVES WEST FORK DRW ARBOR LN W SHERIDAN PL S S U R R E Y LNJENKI SSO N AV E OAK TERSAFFORD AV E WESTERN AVEE SHERIDAN PL E SPRUC E AV E ARMO UR D RS BUTLE R DRW LAW RENCE AVE NORTH AVES KATHRYN LNQUASSEY AVE CRABTREE LN S CIR CL E LNS M IL L B URNE RDW WI NWOOD DR ARDEN SHORE DR RAVINE AVE W OLD MILL RD E L O N G W OOD DR E F O S T E R PLATKINSON RD N F O REST VIEW DRBASIL RD E WITCHWOOD LN W BOWL I N G GR E E N D R W WASHINGTON AVE W INVER L I E T H R D RT 176 N RIDGE RDE RYA N PLN EDGEWOOD RDE NILES AVE N F IELD C T W WESTMINSTER E LOC H LNS KURTI S LNN K NOLLWOOD RD E M O RNINGSIDE DR W KOHL AVE PINE CTE HIGHVIEW TER S RO C K EFELLE R R D B STS ASPEN DRE NORTHMOOR RDN BURTON DRZENNI E GREENVIEW PL W ASH LAWN DR S CAMP US W CENTER AVE ROBINSON D R W LONGMEADOW LN RON A N R D S IG N E C T S FOREST HILL RDSHERWOOD DR W HAWTHORNE CT G STS EVERGREEN DRE WALD E N R DBRYAN W LAKEWOOD DR S CHEROKEE RDN B A Y S H O RE DRMAWMAN AVEW GA V IN CT S FAI RVI EW AVEN WOODBINE PLW WILD ROSE L N E SCOTT STBOBBEW KENNICOTT DR N NORTHSHORE DR N SUSSEX LNFOREST CO VE RD S ALEXIS CTN BURR OAK RDE GREEN BRIAR LNOAK AVEW KAJER LN W KIMBE R L Y L N E TURI C U M RD S LOWELL LNW B R O A D L AND L NN HAWTHORNE PLW HERON RDS SAUNDERS RDW A R R I N G TO N DRBIRCH RDS ARCADY DRC A M B R ID G E R D EUCLID AVE E CRABTREE LN S B RO A DSMOORE DRJAMES ST W ANNA LN W KESWICK LN E QUAIL DRN RT 4 1 I 94S FOREST HILL RDMAWMAN AVEN RT 41 ROCKLAND RD BUENA RDS WAUKEGAN RD 00.510.25 Miles Laurel Ave Everett Rd Lake Bluff Metra Station Fort Sheridan Metra Station West Lake Forest Metra Station East Lake Forest Metra Station North Shore Bike Trail Robe r t M cC lo r y B i k e P a t hSkokie Valley B ike Pat hMi d d l e f o r k S a v a nn a T r a i l , To Des Plaines River Trail ! ! ! ! ! !,To Ch icagoBotan ic Garde ns,To Evansto nChi cago, To Des Plaines River Trail ,To Waukeganand KenoshaExisting Designated Bike Route Existing Key Cycling Destination !Trail Access Points (Existing) Existing Trail ! Metra Stations 62 PAGE | 12 DRAFT SECTION TWO : FRAMEWORK Existing Conditions road conditions to determine the suitability of a roadway for bicycling. Routes yielding a score of “B” or “C” are generally comfortable for casual adult bike riders. Routes with lower Street Segment Name/ID Street Evaluated From Intersecion To Intersecion Curb? Width Outside Lane ADT Speed Percent Parking Residential Street? BLOS Rating Onwentsia-Ahwanee 1 AHWAHNEE LN DEERPATH AHWANEE RD Yes 22 11 200 25 0 Y B 2 AHWAHNEE RD AHWANEE LN MICHGAMME LN No 22 11 900 25 0 Y B 3 AHWAHNEE RD MICHGAMME LN ONWENTSIA RD No 20 10 900 25 0 Y C 4 ONWENTSIA RD AHWANEE RD WESTERN AV Yes 22 11 900 25 0 Y B Conway Farms 5 CONWAY FARMS DR RT 60 880 FT S. RT 60 Yes 50 12 500 25 0 N B 6 CONWAY FARMS DR 880 FT S. RT 60 WOODWARD CT Yes 22 11 500 25 0 Y B 7 CONWAY FARMS DR WOODWARD CT SALISBURY LN Yes 22 11 300 25 0 Y B 8 CONWAY FARMS DR SALISBURY LN EVERETT RD Yes 24 12 300 25 0 Y B Deerpath (Middlefork Savanna to Beach) 9 DEERPATH MIDDLEFORK SAV. RT 43 Yes 20 10 400 25 0 Y B 10 DEERPATH RT 43 KING MUIR RD Yes 30 10 17000 25 0 Y D 11 DEERPATH KING MUIR RD SUSSEX LN Yes 30 15 17000 25 0 Y D 12 DEERPATH SUSSEX LN DEERPATH Yes 30 10 17000 25 0 Y D 13 DEERPATH RT 41 AHWAHNEE LN Yes 35 12 17000 35 0 Y D 14 DEERPATH AHWANEE LN AHWANEE RD Yes 30 15 17000 35 0 Y D 15 DEERPATH AHWANEE RD BRIDGE Yes 34 17 17000 35 0 Y D 16 DEERPATH GOLF LN HASTINGS RD Yes 30 15 17000 35 0 N D 17 DEERPATH HASTINGS RD GREEN BAY RD Yes 30 11 17000 35 0 Y D 18 DEERPATH GREEN BAY RD WESTERN AV Yes 34 11 17000 35 100 N D 19 DEERPATH WESTERN AV MC KINLEY RD Yes 36 13 8000 35 0 N D 20 DEERPATH MC KINLEY RD WALNUT RD Yes 30 10 1000 25 100 N D 21 DEERPATH WALNUT RD WASHINGTON RD Yes 25 12 1000 25 0 Y B 22 DEERPATH WASHINGTON RD SHERIDAN RD Yes 30 11 1000 25 100 Y C 23 DEERPATH SHERIDAN RD LAKE RD Yes 22 11 1000 25 0 Y C Everett-Old Elm 24 EVERETT RD CONWAY FARMS DR TELEGRAPH RD Yes 30 15 4400 35 0 Y C 25 EVERETT RD TELEGRAPH RD R/R TRACKS. RT 43 Yes 35 12 4400 35 0 N D 26 EVERETT RD R/R TRACKS. RT 43 EVERGREEN DR Yes 35 12 4400 35 0 N D 27 EVERETT RD EVERGREEN DR OLD ELM RD Yes 30 10 4400 35 0 Y D 28 OLD ELM RD EVERETT RD RIDGE RD Yes 30 15 3400 30 0 Y C 29 OLD ELM RD RIDGE RD RT 41/RR TRACKS Yes 28 14 3400 30 0 Y C 30 OLD ELM RD RT 41 BUENA RD Yes 36 12 3400 30 0 Y C 31 OLD ELM RD BUENA RD N GREEN BAY RD Yes 28 14 3400 30 0 Y C 32 OLD ELM RD GREEN BAY RD FT SHERIDAN No 20 10 3400 30 0 Y D Telegraph Rd (West Train Station to Half Day Rd) 33 CONWAY RD RT 43 R/R TRACKS/TELEGRAPH Yes 35 12 1400 25 0 N C 34 TELEGRAPH RD EVERETT RD EVERETT SCHOOL Yes 30 10 1500 30 0 Y C 35 TELEGRAPH RD EVERETT SCHOOL WHITE OAK RD No 33 12 1500 30 0 Y C 36 TELEGRAPH RD WHITE OAK RD OLD MILL RD No 18 9 1400 30 0 Y C 37 TELEGRAPH RD OLD MILL RD HALF DAY RD No 18 9 1000 30 0 y C Westleigh 38 WESTLEIGH RD RT 43 YORKTOWNE LN Yes 26 13 1000 35 0 Y C 39 WESTLEIGH RD YORKTOWN LN RIDGE RD No 24 12 1000 35 0 Y B 40 WESTLEIGH RD RIDGE RD R/R TRACKS Yes 26 13 1000 35 0 Y B 41 WESTLEIGH RD RT 41 GREEN BAY RD Yes 24 12 4600 25 0 Y B 42 WESTLEIGH RD GREEN BAY RD SHERIDAN RD Yes 45 12 4600 25 0 Y C Middlefork 43 MIDDLEFORK DR RT 43 ACORN TR Yes 50 25 500 25 0 Y A 44 MIDDLEFORK DR ACORN TR JENSEN DR Yes 26 13 500 25 0 Y B Field Drive-Saunders 45 FIELD DRIVE RT 60 ROUNDABOUT/COM SER Yes 56 12 5000 30 0 N C 46 SAUNDERS RD CONWAY FARMS DR RT 60 No 21 10.5 200 30 0 Y B Bicycle Level of Service (BLOS) rating was determined based on the methodology developed by the League of Illinois Bicyclists using data compiled by the City of Lake Forest for road width, average daily travel (ADT), pavement condition, heavy vehicle traffic, on-street parking and posted speed limit. The rating ranges from A-F with "A" being the highest and attributed to roads with extremely low traffic count to "F", the lowest rating reserved for roads with little to no compatibility for bicycles. FIGURE 4: EXISTING BICYCLE LEVEL OF SERVICE ON SELECTED ROUTES ratings tend to have faster speeds and higher trafﬁ c volume. While bicycle use is permitted on these roads by law, casual riders tend to shy away from using those routes. 63 PAGE | 13DRAFT SECTION TWO : FRAMEWORK BARRIERS & CHALLENGES A major observation from the survey and public input sessions is the lack of a safe east-west connection in Lake Forest. Major barriers to travelling east-west by bicycle include HWY 41, railroads, waterways, and ravines. Very few City roads traverse the entire width of the City from east to west. Those roads that do provide access across the city (Deerpath, Westleigh Rd, Old Elm Rd and Everett Rd) have unique challenges given the wide intersections at major roadways and heavy vehicular trafﬁ c. Existing barrier along the Middlefork Savanna Trail. An informal bike path exists on either side of the tracks with no safe or legal crossing. Bridge over Woodland Road provides a safe crossing along the McClory Bike Path. Wayﬁ nding signage could help identify key destinations such as the Open Lands Skokie Valley Nature Preserve. SIGNAGE There is no cohesive signage plan in Lake Forest pertaining to bicycling. Existing signs are sporatic and not easy to understand. Signage plays a key role in wayﬁ nding and bringing attention to bicyclists on the roadways. TYPES OF USERS The type of user, deﬁ ned by skill, comfort level and experience, varies in Lake Forest from experienced team riders to casual adult riders to children. Some riders are more comfortable navigating busy streets and may not require additional accommodations on the roadway in order to travel by bike. Other riders have less experience and need more encouragement and direction in order to feel comfortable on the roads. Children may appear conﬁ dent on bikes, but lack the trafﬁ c training, experience and sense of older adult riders and should continue to use sidewalk connections throughout the community. The City of Lake Forest recognizes that the type of roadway and proposed enhancement will affect the type of cyclist and level of use a particular route will attract. • Facilities for bicyclists should be planned to accommodate a connected network for all users. • Sidewalk connections should be provided on routes where children and pedestrians are present. 64 PAGE | 14 DRAFT SECTION TWO : FRAMEWORK ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !(!( !( Everett/Old ElmMi d dl e f o r k S a v a n n a ! ! ! ! ! ! !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(Robe r t M cC lo r y B i k e Pa th Skokie Va l ley B ik e Pa th North Shore Bike Path I -94I 94N RT 41 W RT 60 S RT 41 S RIDGE RDW EVERETT RD S WAUKEGAN RDW DEERPATH N WESTERN AVEGREEN BAY RDN LAKE RDN SHERIDAN RDS OAK KNOLL DRE ILLINOIS RD BUENA R D E D E ERP A T H E WESTLEIGH RD E OLD ELM RDS GREEN BAY RDN MCKI NLEY RDS TELEGRAPH RDSHERI DAN RDS VALLEY R DW WESTLEIGH RDN FIELD DRS BEVERL Y PLE W E S TMINSTE R W OLD ELM RD C STS TIMBER LNCO N W A Y FA R M S DRPARK LN S ESTATE LND STWESTERN AVEMUIR AVE F O S T E R A V E E CENTER AVE A R B OR DR E NORTH AVE W CONWAY RD E W O O D L A N D RD N WASHI NGTON RDE SCRANTON AVE S HU N T ER LNA C ADEMY RDN EL M T RE E RDW MELLODY RD S WAVEL A N D RDSMITH AVE H STHIGH STE PROSPECT AVE N BANK LNW GAGE LN ROCKLAND RD PRAIRIE AVE E BLODGETT AVE N OAKWOOD AVES WEST FORK DRW ARBOR LN W SHERIDAN PL BURRIS AVE 1S T S T S S U R REY LNN KING MUIR RDN MAYFLOWER RDOAK TERSAFFORD AVE E SHERIDAN PL E ON W E N T S I A RD 9 T H ST 3 R D ST TALBOT AVE E SPRUCE AV E S HARLAN LNS WESTERN AVEARMO UR D R S BUTL E R DRW LAWRENCE AVE NORTH AVE W CARROLL RD HIGHWOOD AVES KATHRYN LNQUASSEY AVE CRABTREE LNS CIR CLE LNS MIL L B URNE RDW WINWOOD DR LFC2 RD ARDEN SHORE DR RAVINE AVE E WALDEN LN W OLD MILL RD E LONGWOOD DR W ONWENTSIA RD E F O S TE R P L ATKINSON RD N F O REST VIEW DRBASIL RD E WITCHWOOD LN E SHERIDAN RD LYSTER RDW BOWL I N G GRE E N D R W INVERL I E T H R D RT 176 N RIDGE RDE RYA N PL S MT VERNON AVES BASSWOOD RDN EDGEWOOD RDE WASHINGTON AVE W MIDDLEFORK DR N FIEL D CTW WESTMINSTERN WESTMOR E L A N D R D E LINDEN AVE E LOC H LNS KURTI S L NN KNO L L W O O D RD E MARION RD W KOHL AVE PINE CTJENSEN LNE HIGHVIEW TER S CENTRAL AVES WILSON DRW FARM RD E BRIAR L N B STS ASPEN DRE NORTHMOOR RDWIMBLEDON RDBANK LNZENNI E GREENVIEW PL W ASH LAWN DR E R IN GWO O D R D S E LAUREL AVE RAVINE FOREST D R11TH ST S C A M P U S E V I NE A VE E RINGWOO D R D NWESTOVER RDROBINSON D R S ESTES AVEW LONGMEADOW LN RONA N R DLINCOLN AVELOCKARD LNN WAUKEGAN RD S FOREST HILL RDSHERWOOD DR A L B R E C HT D R S EVERGREEN DRE PARK AVE BRYANW LAKEWOOD DR S CHE ROKEE RDS COUNTRY PLS S UFFOLK LNW ALDEN LN N B A Y S H O RE DRMAWMAN AVEW GA VIN CT S FAI RVI EW AVEN WOODBINE PLW WILD ROS E L N E W ALNUT RDN GRIFFITH RDE SCOTT STBOBBEW KENNICOTT DR W A C O R N TRLN NORTHSHORE DR N SUMMIT AVES HI GHLAND AVEW O L D BR ID G E R D E S PRING L N FOREST COVE RD LA ND SDO WN E LN S STABLEWOOD LNN BIRCH A VE N CENTRAL AVEE ASHL E Y R D S ALEXIS CTE GLENWOOD RD W S U M M E R F IE L D D R N BURR OAK RDE GREEN BRIAR LN S MCCORMICK DRW ARC A D Y DRMACLAREN LNN FOO TBALL DRE ATTERIDGE RD W KAJER LN N MEADOW LNPLEASANT AVEBURTIS A VEW CASTLEGATE CT N AHW A H N E E L N S STO NEGAT E RDN HASTINGS RDS LOWELL LNW COVENTRY DR N GOLF LN W TISBURY LN S PADDOCK LNW SAN C T U A R Y LN N WA R WI CK RDN HAWTHORNE PLW TALL G RASS LNW MELVIN AVE S SAUNDERS RDS POLO DRBIRCH RDMOFFETT RD S IE M A N S LITTLEFIELD CTE RAVINE PA RK DR EUCLID AVE S BRO A DSMOORE DRS WINDSOR CT E PEMBROKE DR LAKELAND DR JAMES ST W BLODGETT AVE CARRIAGE PARK LN SUNSET TERCLOVER LNS MAR LANE DRW SA D D LE R U NGAGE LNN FOR ES T PARK DRW ANNA LN M IC H I GAN AVEEVOLUTION AVEN CLOVER AVEPARK PLNORTHERN AVEE Q U A IL DR S MINTHAVEN RDN HAWKWEED LNE RT 41MEARS PLN MAPLE CTE GRANBY RDJAMES CTHAMI L TON CT E GARDNER LN E PINE LN I 94ROCKLAND RD N RT 4 1 N RT 41 S SAUNDERS RDN RT 41 W OLD MILL RDI 94N WA U K E GAN RDQUASSEY AVE N WAUKEGAN RD E LINDEN AVE E WOODLAND RDCRABTREE L N PINE CT0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.50.15 Miles Sunrise Park Lake Forest BeachLake Forest CBDNorthwestern LF Hospital West LF Business District Deerpath Middle School Carriage Way Shopping Center Lake Bluff Elementary School Conway Office Park Skokie Preserve Forest Bluff School Lake Bluff CBD Lake Bluff Middle School Lake Forest High School Fort Sheridan Lake Forest Graduate School of Management Fort Sheridan Preserve Elawa Middlefork Savanna Number of Workshop Groups Identifying Location as Local Destination 1 2 3 - 4 Lake Bluff Feb 2, 2012 Lake Forest Jan 30, 2012 !(1 !(2 !(3 - 4 Regional Bike Trails !Metra Stations Rail Road Lines !Discovered Regional Destinations Outside of Project Area Discovered Local Destinations Community Workshops: Lake Forest, Jan 30, 2012 Lake Bluff, Feb 2, 2012 Analysis of Public Input A public workshop was held in Lake Forest to identify local destinations, regional connections, and local hazards for cyclists in Lake Forest. The information gathered at the workshop and from survey data collected at the beginning of the planning process was used to develop the proposed bike network in an effort to create a Bike Friendly Community for Lake Forest. Figure 5 highlights the key local destinations in Lake Forest and Lake Bluff based on the public input. The Metra stations, Forest Park and Beach and the Conway Ofﬁ ce Park were all called out as important destinations. 80% of cyclists in Lake Forest stated that they ride for health and recreational purposes. Building a bike network will encourage more utilitarian trips to be completed by bike. 80%80% of cyclists0% of cyclists FtttdtFtttd Survey Says... FIGURE 5: 65 PAGE | 15DRAFT SECTION TWO : FRAMEWORK ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! WaukeganGurnee Chicago Glenview Skokie NilesDes Plaines Northbrook Long Grove Arlington Heights WheelingPalatine Mundelein Highland Park Libertyville Evanston Grayslake Mettawa Mount Prospect Vernon Hills Buffalo Grove Park Ridge Elk Grove Village Wilmette Deerfield North Chicago Old Mill Creek Beach Park Glencoe Winnetka Lake Bluff Lincolnshire Morton Grove Wadsworth Riverwoods Northfield Gages Lake Lincolnwood Itasca Park City GolfLakefront Golf RoadDes Plain es Ri verSkokie V a lle yHoward/Sibley Willow Road North w e s t Corri dor Deerfield Road Millenium Trail GlenviewCentralAlgonquin Dundee Road Higgin sEverett/Old Elm Elgin O'HareIrvin g ParkFairfield/QuentinEdens ExpresswayGolf Rd N Waukegan RdSkokie BlvdTri State TollwayIllin ois R o ute 2 1 Rand R d E Higgins Rd Mil w a u k e e A v eN Mi l waukee AveC aldwell Avenue Peterson Avenue E Ra nd Rd Lin coln Av e nueI-290N United States Highway 45Interstate 290W Higgins Rd Miner Street Golf Road S L ak e StN Lake StUnited States Highway 45Harlem AveIllinois Route 58 W Dempster St Illinois To l l way E Dundee Rd I-290 EN R a n d R d Cicero AvenueGreen Bay RdW Dundee Rd East Touhy Avenue Ma n n hei m RoadE Northwest Hwy E a s t R a n d R d S Cumberland AveN Riv er RdWa u k e g a n RdMelvin Amstutz HwyI-Pass W Northwest Hwy East Higgins R o a d W Higgins Road N Harlem AveE Golf Rd Mannheim Rd; Lee StW R a nd R d Interstate 290Illinois Route 58 E Northwes t Hw y E Dundee Rd G o l f RdIllinois Tollway United States Highway 45Tri State TollwayE d e n s E x p r e s sw a y E Ra nd Rd United St a t e s H ighway 45 Illinois Tollwa y Melvin Amstutz HwyN Uni ted States H i g h wa y 4 5 Wau ke g a n Rd0 0.9 1.8 2.7 3.6 4.50.45 Miles Lake M ich igan Independence Grove Libertyville Munderlein Abbott Park Old School FP, St. Marys Rd Mettawa Bannockburn Botanic Gardens Evanston Lake Forest Lake Bluff Number of Focus Groups Indentifying Location as a Regional Destination !1 Focus Group !2 Focus Groups !3 Focus Groups Existing Regional Trails Rail Road !Metra Stations Discovered Regional Connections Community Workshops: Lake Forest, Jan 30, 2012 Lake Bluff, Feb 2, 2012 85% of respondents indicated that it is important that bike routes connect Lake Forest to destinations beyond the city limits. 85%85% of respon5% of respon idi td thtidi td th Survey Says... Regionally, several destinations were identiﬁ ed in proximity to Lake Forest as shown in Figure 6. The regional destinations most accessible to Lake Forest are located along existing major north-south bike paths. Looking forward, new and improved connections to the north and west are desired. The information collected at the public workshops was consistent with the survey data collected at the beginning of the process. FIGURE 6: 66 PAGE | 16 DRAFT SECTION TWO : FRAMEWORK !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Rob e r t M cC l o r y B i k e P a t h Skok ie Va ll ey B i ke Pat hEverett/Old Elm North Shore Bike Path Skok ie V a ll e y B i k e T ra i lI-94I 94N RT 41 W RT 60 S RT 4 1 S RIDGE RDW EVERETT RD S WAUKEGAN RD W DEERPATH N WESTERN AVEGREEN BAY RDN LAKE RDN SHERIDAN RDS OAK KNOLL DRE ILLINOIS RDE D E ER PATH BU E NA R DE WESTLEIGH RD S GREEN BAY RDE OLD ELM RD S TELEGRAPH RDSHERI DAN RDS VALLEY RDW WESTLEIGH RDN FIELD DRS BE VERL Y PL E WESTMINSTER W OLD ELM RD C STS TIMBER LNCONWAY FARMS DR PARK LN S ESTATE LND STMUIR AVE F O S T E R A V E E CENTER AVE E NORTH AVE W CONWAY RD ARBOR DR E WOODLAND RD N WASHINGTON RDE SCRANTON AVE S HUNTER LNACADEMY RDN ELM TREE RDW M ELLOD Y R D S WAVELAND RDSMITH AVE WESTERN AVEH STE PROSPECT AVE N BANK LNW GAGE LN ROCKLAND RD E BLODGETT AVE N OAKWOOD AVES WEST FORK DRW A RB O R LN W SHERIDAN PL BURRIS AVE N MA Y F L OWE R R D1 S T S T S SURREY LNN KING MUIR RDSAFFORD AVE OAK TERE SHERIDAN PL TALBOT AVE E ONWENTSIA RD E SPRUCE AVE 9 T H ST 3R D S TS WESTERN AVES HARLAN LNW LAWRENCE AVE S BUTLER DRNORTH AVES KATHRYN LNHIGHWOOD AVE QUASSEY AVE RAVINE AVE CRABTREE LN S CIRCLE LNS M ILLBUR NE RDLFC2 RD ARDEN SHORE DR E W ALDEN LN W OLD MILL RD BLAIRE LONG WOOD DR W ONWENTSIA RD ATKINSON RD E F O S T ER PL BASIL RD N FOREST VIEW DRW WOODLAND RD E WITCHWOOD LN E SHERIDAN RD W BOW LING GREEN DR S WEDGEWOOD DRW INVERLIETH RD RT 176 S MT VERNON AVEN RIDGE RDE WASHINGTON AVE E NILES AVE E LINDEN AVEN F I ELD CTW WESTMINSTER S STABLE LNE LOCH LN S KURTI S LNW KOHL AVE N K NOL LW O O D RD E MORNINGSIDE DRE MARION RDPINE CTJ E NSE N LN E HIGHVIEW TER S ROCKEF E L L ER RD E BRIAR LN S ASPEN DRB STE NORTHMOOR RDN BURTON DRWIMBLEDON RDW ASH LAWN DR BANK L NZENNI E GREENVIEW PL E LAUREL AVE S WALLACE RDN AHWAHNEE RDE VIN E A V E 11TH ST S C AMP U SLINCOLN AVER O NA N R DS SHERIDA N RDN WAUKEGAN RD LOCKARD LNSHERWOOD DR W HAWTHORNE CT E PARK AVE BRYANALBRECHT DRE WALDEN RD S EVERGREEN DRE COLLEGE RD S T UR I CU M RDS COUNTR Y PLMAWMAN AVEW LAKEWOOD DR S CHEROKEE RDE RO S E MAR Y R DN BAY SHORE DRW ALDEN LN S FAI RVI EW AVEW GAVIN CT E WALNUT RDN WOODBINE PLBOBBEN SUMMIT AVEW KENNICOTT DR W AC O R N T RL W OLD BRIDGE RD S STABLEWOOD LNN BIRCH AVEFOREST COVE RD LA ND S DO WN E L N S ALEXIS CTN BURR OAK RDE GREEN BRIAR LN W ARCADY DR OAK AVEN FOOTBALL DRSUNRI SE AVEW KAJER LN N MEADOW LNS S T ONEGAT E RDW C O V E N T R Y D R S LOWELL LNN HASTINGS RDW TISBURY LN N GOLF LNS PADDOCK LNS WINDRIDGE DRW BROADLAND LNBAYONNE AVEW MELVIN AVE S SAUNDERS RDBIRCH RDMOFFETT RD S IEM A N W WILSON DR FACULTY CIR S F R A N Z D R LAKELAND DR JAMES ST W BLODGETT AVE N PEMBRIDGE DRBRIAR LN N FOREST PARK DRW ANNA LN E B A R AT CT W YALE CT N CLOVER AVENORTHERN AVEOAKRIDGE AVES MINTHAVEN RDE Q U A IL DRE RT 41MAIN ST N MAPLE CTHA M I LT O N C TJAMES CTN JUNE TERE GARDNER LN E ROSE TERS WAUKEGAN RDI 94N RT 4 1 I 94W OLD MILL RD BUENA RDQUASSEY AVE PINE CTN WA UK E GA N RDN RT 41 E WOODLAND RD GREEN BAY RD0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.50.15 Miles´ ! !Metra Stations Rail Lines Existing Bike Trails Hazards identified during Lake Bluff Community Meeting (Feb 2, 2012) ! !1 !2 - 3 4 - 5 Hazards identified during Lake Forest Community Workshop Jan 30, 2012 (shown by number of workshop groups identifying hazard area) cEcE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE Locations of reported accidents involving bicycles in Lake Forest (May 2010-Feb 2012) Discovered Areas Hazardous to Cyclists Community Workshops: Lake Forest, Jan 30, 2012 Lake Bluff, Feb 2, 2012 Over 50% of cyclists would be encouraged to bike more if pavement markings and signage were installed in Lake Forest. Over 50% ofOver 50% of ld bld b Survey Says... An overlay of reported bike crashes from the past ﬁ ve years and indentiﬁ ed hazard areas called out by participants at the public workshops are represented in Figure 7. Based on survey data and the input from the workshops, crossing busy intersections and conﬂ icts with vehices while sharing the road were key issues stressed regarding bicycle safety in Lake Forest and Lake Bluff. Education on how to “share the road” and proper bicycling ettiquette will be important moving forward with this plan. A series of “Dream Routes” were identiﬁ ed at the public workshops and used as the basis for evaluation to determine the bicycle network. While all roads can be used by cyclists, the Bicycle Master Plan recommends those routes that bypass busy, narrow streets and still connect to key destinations. Looking at a 2-mile radius around the two Metra stations shown in Figure 8, it is clear how bikeable Lake Forest could be with some minor improvements to support bicycles on the roadways. FIGURE 7: 67 PAGE | 17DRAFT SECTION TWO : FRAMEWORK !(!( !( Everett/Old ElmMi d d l e f o r k Sa v a n n a ! ! ! ! ! ! !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(Robe r t McC lo ry B i ke P a t hSkokie Va lley B ike Pa th North Shore Bike Path I-94 I 94N RT 41 W RT 60 S RT 41 S RIDGE RDW EVERETT RD S WAUKEGAN RDW DEERPATH N WESTERN AVEGREEN BAY RDN LAKE RDN SHERIDAN RDS OAK KNOLL DRE ILLINOIS RD BUENA R D E D EER P A T H E WESTLEIGH RDN WAUKEGAN RDE OLD ELM RDS GREEN BAY RDN MCKINLEY RDS TELEGRAPH RDS VALLEY R DW WESTLEIGH RDN FIELD DRS BEVERLY PLE W E S TMINST E R W OLD ELM RD C STS TIMBER LNCONWAY FA R M S DR SHERIDAN RDPARK LN S ESTATE LND STWESTERN AVEMUIR AVE F O S T E R A V E E CENTER AVE A R B OR DR E NORTH AVE W CONW A Y RD E W O O D L A N D RD N WASHI NGTON RDE SCRANTON AVE S HU N TER LNA C ADEMY RDN EL M T REE RDW MELLODY RD S WAVEL A N D RDSMITH AVE H STHIGH STE PROSPECT AVE N BANK LNW GAGE LN ROCKLAND RD PRAIRIE AVE E BLODGETT AVE N OAKWOOD AVES WES T FORK DRW ARBOR LN W SHERIDAN PL BURRIS AVE 1 ST ST S S U R REY LNN KING MUIR RDN MAYFLOWER RDOAK TERSAFFORD AVE E SHERIDAN PL E ONW E N T S I A RD 9 TH S T 3 RD ST TALBOT AVE E SPRUCE AV E S HARLAN LNS WESTERN AVEARMO UR D R S BUTL E R DRW LAWRENCE AVE NORTH AVE W CARROLL RD HIGHWOOD AVES KATHRYN LNCRABTREE LNS CIR CLE LNS MIL L B URNE RDW WINWOOD DR LFC2 RD ARDEN SHORE DR RAVINE AVE E WALDEN LN W OLD MILL RD E LONGWOOD DR W ONWENTSIA RD E F O S TE R P L ATK INSON RD N F O REST VIEW DRBASIL RD E WITCHWOOD LN E SHERIDAN RD LY STER RD W BOWL I N G GRE E N D R W INVE R L I E T H R D RT 176 N RIDGE RDE RYA N PL S MT VERNON AVES BASSWOOD RDN EDGEWOOD RDE WASHINGTON AVE W MIDDLEFORK DR N FIEL D CTW WESTMINSTERN WESTMOR E L A N D R D E LINDEN AVE E LOC H LNS KURTI S L NN KNO L L W O O D R D E MARION RD W KOHL AVE PINE CTJENSEN LNE HIGHVIEW TER S CENTRAL AVES WILSON DRW FARM RD E BRIAR L N B STS ASPEN DRE NORTHMOOR RDWIMBLEDON RDQUASSEY AVE BANK LN ZENNI E GREENVIEW PL W ASH LAWN DR E R IN G WO O D R D S E LAUREL AVE RAVINE FOREST D R11TH ST S CA M PUS E V INE A VE E RINGWOO D R D NWESTOVER RD ROBINSON D R S ESTES AVEW LONGMEADOW LN RON A N R DLINCOLN AVELOCKARD LNS FOREST HILL RDSHERWOOD DR A L B R E C HT D RS EVERGREEN DRE PARK AVE BRYANW LAKEWOOD DR S CHEROKEE RDS COUNTRY PL S S UFFOLK LNW ALDEN LN N B A Y S H O RE DRMAWMAN AVEW GA VIN CT S FAI RVIE W AVEN WOODBINE PLW WILD ROS E L N E W ALNUT RDN GRIFFITH RDE SCOTT STBOBBEW KENNICOTT DR W A C O R N TRLN NORTHSHORE DR N SUMMIT AVES H IG HLAND AVE W O L D BR ID G E R D E S P R IN G LN FOREST COVE RD LA N D S D OWNE LN S STABLEWOOD LNN BIRCH A VE N CENTRAL AVEE ASHL E Y R D S ALEXIS CTE GLENWO OD RD W S U M M E R F IE L D D R N BURR OAK RDE GREEN BRIAR LN S MCCORMICK DRW ARC A D Y DRMACLAREN LNN FO O TBALL DRE ATTERIDGE RD W KAJER LN N MEADOW LNPLEASANT AVEBURTI S A VEW CASTLEGATE CT N A HW A H N E E L N S S T ONEGAT E RDN HASTINGS RDS LOWELL LNW C O VENTRY DR N GOLF LNW TISBURY LN S PADDOCK LNW GLOUCE S T E R XINGW B R O A D LAND L NW S AN C T U A R Y LN N WA R WI CK RDN HAWTHORNE PLW TALL G RASS LNW MELVIN AVE S SAUNDERS RDS POLO DRBIRCH RDMOFFETT RD SIE MAN S LITTLEFIELD CTE RAVINE PA RK DR EUCLID AVE S B R O A DSMOORE DRS WINDSOR CT E PEMBROKE DR LAKELAND DR JAMES ST W BLODGETT AVE CAR R IAGE PA RK LN SUNSET TERBARK CLOVER LNS MAR LANE DRW SA D D LE R U NGAGE LNN FORES T PARK DRW ANNA LN M IC H I GAN AVEEVOLUTION AVEN CLOVER AVEPARK PLNORTHERN AVEE Q U A IL D R S MINTHAVEN RDN HAWKWEED LNE RT 41 MEARS PLN MAPLE CTE GRANBY RDJAMES CTH A M I LT O N C T E GARDNER LN E PINE LN I 94SHERID AN RDN RT 4 1 N RT 41 S SAUNDERS RDN RT 41 W OLD MILL RDI 94QUASSEY AVE ROCKLAND RD E LINDEN AVECRABTREE L N PINE CTE WOODLAND RD 0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.50.15 Miles Sunrise Park Lake Forest BeachLake Forest CBDNorthwestern LF Hospital West LF Business District Deerpath Middle School Carriage Way Shopping Center Lake Bluff Elementary School Conway Office Park Skokie Preserve Forest Bluff School Lake Bluff CBD Lake Bluff Middle School Lake Forest High School Fort Sheridan Lake Forest Graduate School of Management Fort Sheridan Preserve Elawa Middlefork Savanna ,,2 Miles1/2 M i l e Where can you bike in 15 Minutes? FIGURE 8 An average bicyclist can cycle 2 miles in 15 minutes. Looking at Lake Forest and Lake Bluff with this lens offers a glimpse into the possibilities for a bicycle friendly community. 68 PAGE | 18 DRAFT SECTION TWO : FRAMEWORK Proposed Bicycle Network The proposed Bicycle Network in Figure 9 identiﬁ es Core Routes and Branch Connections that facilitate movement through the community on bike. In order to improve the comfort level for cyclists on the identiﬁ ed routes, bicycle facilities can be installed to improve the Bicycle Level of Service (BLOS). Core Routes and Branch Connections were determined based on public input and analysis of the existing roadways. An example of how to use the Bicycle Master Plan is included later in this report. Priority should be given to improvements on Core Routes when feasible. A Priority Table, based on ease of completion, importance to the bicycle network and upcoming projects is included in Appendix D. CORE ROUTES Core Routes are deﬁ ned as critical to the bicycle network and provide connections not easily made on other streets or paths. For example, the existing bike paths within Lake Forest connect major destinations within the City and beyond and form the core of the Bicycle Network. Proposed Core Routes accommodate east-west movement on bikes. Improvements should be planned for the Core Routes to accommodate more regular bike trafﬁ c. Core Routes are utilitarian in nature and serve to support a mode-shift from vehicles to bicycles for short trips. • Robert McClory Bike Path (existing trail) • Skokie Valley Bike Path (existing trail) • North Shore Bike Path (existing trail) • Waukegan Road (existing side-path) • Rt 60 • E Deerpath (Lake to McKinley) • Ahwahnee-Onwentsia Corridor • W. Deerpath (Ahwahnee to Middlefork Savanna Trail) • Laurel Avenue • Everett/Old Elm Corridor BRANCH CONNECTIONS While all streets in Lake Forest should be considered part of the bicycle network, the key road segments or Branch Connections identiﬁ ed in the Bicycle Master Plan provide a higher level of connectivity to the Core Routes and key destinations. These routes could beneﬁ t from additional enhancement to support bicycling on the identiﬁ ed corridor. • Beverly Place • Conway Farms Drive • Field Court/Field Drive • Mayﬂ ower-Lake Road Corridor • Middlefork Drive • Ridge Road (by Grove Campus) • Telegraph Road • Westleigh Road • Existing paved neighborhood park pathways INTERSECTIONS Wide, busy intersections are challenging for bicyclists to cross. Improving key intersections can help facilitate east-west movement through the City. Intersections identiﬁ ed in the plan may require collaboration with the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) to complete improvements. However, projects on routes leading to and from the intersections should be evaluated for bicycle compatibility and treated in a manner that would enhance and support future intersection improvements. Key intersections identiﬁ ed in this plan are those routes that cross Waukegan Road, Highway 41, and Route 60. Given the nature of these major roads, with heavy trafﬁ c levels and higher speeds, providing enhancements to improve bicycle safety is important. 69 PAGE | 19DRAFT SECTION TWO : FRAMEWORK PAGE | 19 FIGURE 9: PROPOSED BICYCLE NETWORK ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,# ! # # # # #Trail WayHill St North Ave Old TrlDato AveUniversity AveBroa dle y 's Ct W Old Mill RdI 94N RT 4 1 S RT 41 S RI DGE RDW EVERETT RD N WESTERN AVEGREEN BAY RDN SHERIDAN RDS OAK KNOLL DRE ILLINOIS RD BUENA R D E WESTLEIGH RD S GREEN BAY RDN MCKINLEY RDS VALLEY RDW WESTLEIGH RD S BEVERL Y PL W OLD ELM RD C STS TIMBER LNPARK LN S ESTATE LND STMUIR AVE F O S T E R A V E E CENTER AVE A R B OR DR E NORTH AVE W CONW A Y RD E W O O D L A N D R D N WASHINGTON RDS HU N T ER LNAC ADEMY RDW MELLODY RD S WAVELAN D RDSMITH AVE H STW GAGE LN E BLODGETT AVE S WEST FORK DRW ARBOR LN W SHERIDAN PL S S U R R E Y LNJENK IS S ON A VE OAK TERSAFFORD AVE WESTERN AVEE SHERIDAN PL E SPRUC E AV E ARMO UR D RS BUTLE R DRW LAWRENCE AVE NORTH AVES KATHRYN LNQUASSEY AVE CRABTREE LN S CIR CL E LNS M IL L B URNE RDW W INWOOD DR ARDEN SHORE DR RAVINE AVE W OLD MILL RD E L O N G W OOD DR E F OS T E R PL ATKINSON RD N F O REST VIEW DRBASIL RD E WITCHWOOD LN W BOWL I N G GR E E N D R W WASHINGTON AVE W INVE R L I E T H R D RT 176 N RIDGE RDE RYA N PLN EDGEWOOD RDE NILES AVE N F IELD C T W WESTMINSTER E LOC H LNS KURTI S LNN K NOLLWOOD RD E M O R N INGSIDE DR W KOHL AVE PINE CTE HIGHVIEW TER S RO CKEFELLE R R D B STS ASPEN DRE NORTHMOOR RDN BURTON DRZENNI E GREENVIEW PL W ASH LAWN DR S CAMPU S W CENTER AVE ROBINSON D R W LONGM EADOW LN RON A N R D SI G N E C T S FOREST HILL RDSHERWOOD DR W HAWTHORNE CT G STS EVERGREEN DRE WALD E N R DBRYAN W LAKEW OOD DR S CHEROKEE RDN B A Y S H O RE DRMAWMAN AVEW GA V IN CT S FA IRV IEW AVEN WOODBINE PLW WILD ROSE L N E SCOTT STBOBBEW KENNICOTT DR N NORTHSHORE DR N SUSSEX LNFOREST COVE RD S ALEXIS CTN BURR OAK RDE GREEN BRIAR LNOAK AVEW KAJER LN W KIMBE R L Y L N E TURI C U M RD S LOWELL LNW B R O A D L AND L NN HAWTHORNE PLW HERON RDS SAUNDERS RDW A R R I N G TO N DRBIRCH RDS ARCADY DRC A M B R I D G E R D EUCLID AVE E CRAB TRE E LN S B R O A DSMOORE DRJA MES ST W ANNA LN W KESWICK LN E QUAIL D RN RT 4 1 I 94S FOREST HILL RDMAWMAN AVEN RT 41 ROCKLAND RD 00.510.25 Miles Route 60 Middlefork Dr Westleigh Rd Old Elm Rd Laurel Ave Mayflower Deerpath Everett RdConway Farms D rLake Bluff Metra Station Fort Sheridan Metra Station West Lake Forest Metra Station North Shore Bike Trail Lake Rd Onwentsia RdAhwanee RdField Dr,To Des Plaines River Trail Robe r t M cC lo r y B ik e Pa t hMid d l e f o r k S a v a n n a T r a i l , To Des Plaines River Trail ! ! ! ! !! !,To Ch icagoBotanic Ga rde ns,To Evanst onand Chicag o, To Des Plaines River Trail ,To Waukeganand Kenosha Telegraph RdWaukegan RdRidge Rdy ! ! ! Skokie Valley Bike Path Trail Access Northwestern Lake Forest Hospital Fort Sheridan Forest Park/Beach Library LFHS Market Square Elawa Farm Conway Office Park Grove Campus Deerpath !Townline Park P E M B R O K E D R Lake Bluff ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( East Lake Forest Metra Station Ce nt ral Busines s Distr ict: M c Clo ry Bike Pa th Co nn ect ion! Deerpath Middle School Skokie River Forest Preserve Nor th c ro f t P a r kEverett Park Waveland Park South Park Triangle Park D eerpath Derwen MawrNature Preserve Deerpath Community Park Skokie Va l ley B ike Pa th Draft Connection Opportunities Draft Core Routes Desired Destination Trail Access Points (Existing) Draft Key Branch Connections Existing Trail ! #Metra Stations Key Intersections ! ,,( nmnmnm Parks and Open Space Cemetery West Skokie River Preserve Everett Farm Melody Farms ! Skokie Valley Bike Path Trail Access Highwood Metra Station,To Route 20 Bi ke PathTo Abbot t Par k and Waukegan, Coordinate Waukegan Side Path with the Village of BannockburnCoordina te Pa th w i th Vi l lage of Lake B l uf f !!Potential Railroad Crossing Potential Railroad Crossing ,,,,,,,70 PAGE | 20 DRAFT SECTION TWO : FRAMEWORK Possible enhancements might include: • Pavement Sensors Providing for pavement sensors in areas identiﬁ ed for bicycle use help to encourage bicyclists to follow the rules of the road by treating bicycles with the same importance as vehicles when alerting a trafﬁ c light to change. • Timing of Trafﬁ c Lights In some instances, the duration of trafﬁ c lights could be modiﬁ ed to improve the compatibility of a route for bicyclists and allow sufﬁ cient time for a bicycle to cross a large intersection without negatively disrupting vehicular ﬂ ow. • No Turn on Red Prohibiting right turn on red for motor vehicles provides a safer environment for bicyclists waiting to cross a major intersection. In cases where cars are permitted to turn on red, turn lanes should be clearly marked and pavement markings should clearly identify a safe path for bicyclists. • Bike Boxes Pavement markings and clear deliniation of bicycle areas help to promote consistency and predictability of cyclists along a route. Figure 10 provides a sample of how a bike box could be conﬁ gured at a busy intersection such as Westleigh Road and Highway 41. CONNECTION OPPORTUNITIES Connection opportunities are important connections identiﬁ ed in the Bicycle Network that require additional planning and collaboration with private land holders or other government entities. These connections go beyond evaluating a roadway and adding a bicycle facility to improve compatibility and highlight more creative areas for future bicycle connections. These opportunities relate to new development areas such as the Northwestern Lake Forest Hospital site and older establishments such as Lake Forest College and Lake Forest Academy and can help enhance the proposed bicycle network through private Master Plans. This plan recognizes the importance of the larger community institutions in completing a Bicycle Network and encourages continued communication and collaboration with the City of Lake Forest. Other connection opportunities require joint effort from several government jurisdictions such as providing a connection from Field Drive in Lake Forest to Bradley Road in unincorporated Lake County to establish a more direct connection to Rt 176 and beyond. These connection opportunities are called out with brown arrows in Figure 9. CASE STUDY - ROUTE 60 CORRIDOR The Route 60 corridor is identiﬁ ed in the Bicycle Master Plan as a Core Route with several connection opportunies (Figure 11). The roadway has a high number of vehicles- traveled-per-day and a high posted speed limit. These conditions make an on-road facility challenging and not desired for the majority of riders. Despite the challenges associated with this corridor, Route 60 provides connections to regional trails and local destinations including Townline Park, Lake Forest Academy and Conway Ofﬁ ce Park.Cars stop here Bike Lane Bikes wait here FIGURE 10: SAMPLE BIKE BOX 71 PAGE | 21DRAFT SECTION TWO : FRAMEWORK The design of the Rt 60 bicycle facility could take on many different characters from a central median to a winding pathway. ! ! !,,,,,,,,W RT 60I 94W DEERPATH N RT 41 S RT 41 W WESTLEIGH RDS RID GE RDACADEMY RDW MELLODY RDN FIELD DRN WAUKEGAN RDS WAUKEGAN RDCONWAY FARMS DRS SAUNDERS RDN KING MUIR RDN RIDGE RDN F IELD C T S WALLACE RDN AHWAHNEE RDW LONGMEADOW LN S SUFFO LK LNN SUSSEX LNN CHILTERN DRN AHWAHNEE LNS STABLE LNW T I SB UR Y LN N SU F F OL K L NN WARWIC K RDFACULTY CIRN RUE FOR E T DRN MELLODY RDW Y A L E C T N SAVANNA C T WOODLAND LN S AHWAHNEE RDS ASBURY CTW E S TB RI DGE CI R S DANBURY CTW NORTH POND LN N HIGH HOLBORNW SAUNDERS RD AMBE R LEY C T S E DGE F I E LD LNS ASHLAND LNS CANTERBURY CTW J AC Q U E LYN LNS NEWPORT CTW VERDA LN S BRADFORD CTS M E A D O W L A K E L N W PARKMEAD LN W EDGECOTE LN W MELLODY RDI 9400.250.50.125 Miles ´ Route 60 Westleigh Rd Deerpath Conway Farms D r! ! !,,,,,,,,,,W RT 60I 94W DEERPATH N RT 41 S RT 41 W WESTLEIGH RDS R IDGE RDACADEMY RD W MELLODY RDN FIELD DRN WAUKEGAN RDS WAUKEGAN RDCONWAY FARMS DRS SAUNDERS RDN KING MUIR RDN RIDGE RDN FI E L D CT S WALLACE RDN AHWAHNEE RDW LONGMEADOW LN S SU FFO LK LNN SUSSEX LNN CHILTERN DRN AHWAHNEE LNS STABLE LNW TISB U RY L NN S U F F OL K L NN WARWICK RDFACULTY CI RN RUE FORET DRN MELLODY RDW Y A L E C T N SAVANNA CT WOODLAND LN S AHWAHNEE RDS ASBURY CTW ES T B R IDGE C IR S DANBURY CTW NORTH POND LN N HIGH HOLBORNW SAUNDERS RD A M B ERLEY C T S ED GE F I E L D LNS ASHLAND LNS CANTERBURY CTW JACQ U ELYN LNS NEWPORT CTW VERDA LN S BRADFORD CTS M E A D O W L A K E LN W PARKMEAD LN W EDGECOTE LN W MELLODY RDI 94Enhanced Connection Deerpath Westleigh Rd Conway Farms D rRoute 60 ,,Future Connections Between Trails Existing Trails Rivers and Streams !Access Points (Existing) Opportunities for Sharrows Opportunities for Signed RoutesI-94I-94Fiel d Driv e Fiel d Driv e Waukegan RoadSkoki e Va l ley T ra i l Waukegan RoadSkokie Va l l ey Tra i lMiddlefork-Savanna TrailMiddlefork-Savanna TrailFIGURE 11: ROUTE 60 CORRIDOR The Rt 60 Corridor has several opportunities for enhanced connections. Recognizing the existing barriers such as railroad tracks and wetlands, the Master Plan identiﬁ es key connections that would enhance and facilitate east-west movement in Lake Forest. A railroad crossing north of Rt. 60 is identiﬁ ed as a priority. HOW CAN THE CONNECTION BE ENHANCED? WHAT COULD ROUTE 60 LOOK LIKE?,Potential Railroad Crossing Access to and across Rt. 60 Access to and across Rt. 60 Potential Railrroad Crossing 72 PAGE | 22 DRAFT SECTION TWO : FRAMEWORK FIGURE 12: PROPOSED MCKINLEY TWO- WAY SIDE PATH CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT Encouraging people to bike to and around the Central Business District will increase economic development and promote active transportation options for errands, shopping and socializing. The East Lake Forest Train Station is a transportation hub for commuters and visitors to the Central Business District. Bicycles are an important consideration to preserving a vibrant and active downtown. The City of Lake Forest is working to secure grant funding to improve conditions for bicyclists in the Central Business District including a bike path connection and additional bicycle parking at the train station. ROBERT MCCLORY BIKE PATH CONNECTION The Robert McClory Bike Path was constructed in the former Chicago North Shore and Milwaukee Railroad right of way. The bike path is separated from vehicular trafﬁ c throughout Lake Forest, except from concrete apronMcKINLEY ROADconcrete apronconcrete bituminous concrete apronWESTERN AVENUE8 10.0'3.0'5.5' 701.75 698.3 11 698.4 698.6 698.2 698.5 698.3 700.75 699.5 S N S N 701.6 703.6 Crosswalk • 10-foot Bike Path proposed between McKinley Road and parking lots. • Buffer bumpout proposed to provide a landscape area in front of the train station and improve the pedestrian crossing. • Provides new accessible ramp from McKinley crosswalk to the train station. • Provides opportunity for covered bike parking associated with the bike path. • Relocates bike crossing to controlled intersections to improve safety and predictability of cyclists in the Central Business District. 73 PAGE | 23DRAFT SECTION TWO : FRAMEWORK Woodland Road (north of the train station) to Illinois Road (south of the train station). Between Woodland and Illinois Roads bike trafﬁ c is routed through a series of parking lots serving the Metra Train Station, and the City of Lake Forest Central Business District, a distance of approximately 1/2 mile. Improving the connection of the McClory Bike Path through the Central Business District to create a safe bicycling environment is recommended. Several public comments were received regarding the existing conditions of roads and trafﬁ c patterns in this area and the need to improve the connection for all users of the Robert McClory Bike Path. The proposed separated bike path along McKinley Road provides a continuous route between Illinois and Woodland Roads. As the design of this connection is ﬁ nalized, the following considerations are critical to the success of the project. • The path material should be consistent with the existing asphalt path with minimal pavement markings. • Signage along the connection speciﬁ cally, and Robert McClory Bike Path generally, should be minimized to preserve the character of the bike path. • Signage limited to the necessary directional signage needed to direct cyclists to the Central Business District and Metra station is appropriate. • Sufﬁ cient space should be installed between the path and the parking spaces on McKinley to protect bicyclists from open car doors. • Careful attention to the approach and treatment of intersections to ensure predictibility and safety of all modes of transportation is required. See Figures 13 and 14. • Landscaping should be installed to effectively screen parked cars from McKinley Road. • Location, size, and design of the bicycle parking structures and modiﬁ cations to the landscaping and streetscape in front of the East Lake Forest Train Station will be considered by the Historic Preservation Commission, consistent with standard City practices. • Given the nature of the Robert McClory Bike Path as a multi-user pathway, design techniques to slow the ﬂ ow of bicycle trafﬁ c through the Central Business District is encouraged. • If after further study a separated side path is determined to be infeasible, way ﬁ nding signage or marked, shared lanes for bicycling should be considered. FIGURE 13: SAMPLE SIGNAGE ANNOUNCING INTERSECTION FIGURE 14: SAMPLE INTERSECTION TREATMENT Source: League of Illinois Bicyclists (Presentation at UIC, 2010) Source: League of Illinois Bicyclists (Presentation at UIC, 2010) The intersection of the proposed path with Deerpath and Westminster should be designed to increase visibility and provide safe crossing for all modes of transportation. 74 PAGE | 24 DRAFT SECTION TWO : FRAMEWORK SIGNAGE AND MAPS Signage is an important component of the Bicycle Master Plan. Signage helps to identify a bicycle route, remind motorists and bicyclists to share a roadway, and provides way ﬁ nding information to key destinations. CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT The Central Business District is a hub for the Bicycle Network in Lake Forest. Clariﬁ cation of the signage around the Central Business District is recommended as part of this plan to direct cyclists to key destinations and Before - “Walk Bikes” signs imply that no bike riding is allowed in the Central Business District FIGURE 15: CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT SIGNAGE After - install “Walk on Sidewalk/Ride on Street” signs to encourage predictable behavior create a bike friendly environment in the Central Business District. The East Lake Forest Train station serves as a warming house for bicyclists using the Robert McClory Bike Path and commuters taking the train toward Chicago or Kenosha. Standard directional and wayﬁ nding signage is encouraged in this area to support bicycle activity. Figure 15 provides an example of how signage could be clariﬁ ed to encourage the pedestrian character of the downtown, while still encouraging bicyclists to ride to the Central Business District. 75 PAGE | 25DRAFT SECTION TWO : FRAMEWORK FIGURE 16: SAMPLE SIGNED ROUTE - CONWAY FARMS Remind people to “share the road” BIKE ROUTE SIGNAGE There are several different types of bike route signage including signs to “Share the Road” shown in Figure 16 and basic “Bike Route” and Directional signage shown in Figure 17 and Figure 18. This type of signage can supplement pavement markings on a preferred bicycle corridor or stand alone as a reminder to all users that bikes and cars should be expected on the roadway. Installation of bike route signage is an affordable and effective way to establish a bicycle network. Whenever possible, existing sign poles should be used to avoid visual clutter along the roadways. Bike Route Identiﬁ cation combined with wayﬁ nding signage FIGURE 17: SAMPLE BIKE ROUTE AND DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE INSTALLATION AT LONGMEADOW In addition, regulatory signage should be installed in key location to remind cyclists of the State law to ride in a manner that does not impede the normal ﬂ ow of trafﬁ c. For example, in instances where approaching cars are present, cyclists should ride single ﬁ le and in no case ride more than 2 riders abreast. Figure 19 provides an example of how signage could be clariﬁ ed along preferred streets for cycling. PUBLICATIONS The City of Lake Forest has been selected to work with the League of Illinois Bicyclists to create a “Bike to Metra” brochure in an effort to raise awareness of how to utilize biking as part of a daily commute. The pamphlet will promote bike routes and destinations of interest in Lake Forest including the shops and restaurants in the Central Business District. FIGURE 18: SAMPLE DIRECTIONAL SIGN When vehicles are present, bicyclists should ride single ﬁ le and in a manner that does not impede vehicular travel in accordance with State Law. FIGURE 19: SAMPLE REGULATORY SIGN Single File When Vehicles Are Present 76 PAGE | 26 DRAFT SECTION TWO : FRAMEWORK BICYCLE PARKING Bicycle Parking is an important component of a bicycle friendly environment. Well-placed bicycle parking can encourage cyclists to make a trip on bike and also decrease clutter and hazards throughout the Central Business District and at key destinations (See Figure 21). Creative solutions to provide additional bicycle parking, such as the “BOOKS” rack at the Public Library are encouraged. TYPE OF BIKE RACKS The type of bike rack may vary depending on the location, character and anticipated capacity. Bicycle rack design should follow standards outlined in the Bicycle Parking Guidelines prepared by the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals. The chosen bike rack should: • Support the bicycle in an upright position. • Stabilize the wheel of the bicycle from tipping. • Support all types of bicycles. • Enable both the frame and wheel of a bicycle to be secured. Observed bicycle parking in the Central Business District within a doorway to a local business. Blocking the entrance to buildings in not only a nuisance but a safety concern as well. Temporary bicycle corrals at key locations in the Central Business District will help promote bicycle use. DESTINATION BICYCLE PARKING Providing bicycle parking at key locations requires collaboration with private property owners and The City of Lake Forest. Continued monitoring of bicycle parking throughout Lake Forest is encouraged to facilitate and encourage bicycle use to key destinations. • Bicycle parking should be considered as part of new development in the Business and Ofﬁ ce Zoning Districts and Special Use Permits. • Bicycle parking should be provided at all City owned buildings and parks. • Bicycle parking should be located in a manner that does not restrict pedestrian access to building entrances or use of the sidewalk. • Bicycle parking should be located within 50 feet of a desired destination and be visible from the main entrance to a destination or park. • Temporary Bike Corrals are encouraged to support bicycling in the warmer months. Figure 20 provides an example of a temporary bike corral on Western Avenue within existing vehicle parking spaces. FIGURE 20: EXAMPLE OF TEMPORARY BICYCLE PARKING IN CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT 77 PAGE | 27DRAFT SECTION TWO : FRAMEWORK Currently, bike parking Currently, bike parking is here, but...is here, but... ...people park their ...people park their bikes here. bikes here. ...consider moving bike parking to a better location...consider moving bike parking to a better location FIGURE 21: OBSERVATION OF EXISTING BICYCLE PARKING ISSUES IN CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT Possible Covered Bike Parking at East Lake Forest Train Station. Structures in this area should not block views of the historic station and will be considered by the Historic Preservation Commission. FIGURE 22: EXAMPLE OF COVERED BICYCLE PARKING COMMUTER BICYCLE PARKING Covered, long-term bicycle parking at the two train stations in Lake Forest should be installed to promote bicycling to and from the train stations. Additional consideration of commuter bicycle parking at major ofﬁ ce centers such as the Conway Ofﬁ ce Park should be considered. Covered bike parking should: • Be located in a manner that does not negatively impact historic structures or landscapes. Figure 22 provides a conceptual idea for bicycle parking at the East Lake Forest Train Station. • Be located within 50 feet of the train station or destination. • Be safe and secure. • Protect bicycles from the elements. The provided bicycle parking is located too far from the front door and is not used by cyclists. Providing visible, well located bicycle parking is essential to creating a bicycle friendly community. 78 PAGE | 28 DRAFT SECTION TWO : FRAMEWORK Toolbox of Bicycle Facilities Signage Pavement Markings Bike Lanes • Signed bike routes identify destinations and connections using standard signage. Given the historic character of Lake Forest, careful attention to the placement and number of signs will be critical to the success of this tool. Signage in key areas will help guide residents & visitors around town. • Share the Road signage identiﬁ es a preferred bicycle route in Lake Forest and provides a visual sign for motorists and bicycles to share the road. • Destination and mileage signage is appropriate to direct visitors to the Central Business District and key destinations throughout town. • Pavement markings help to identify preferred bike routes in the city. Tools like “sharrows” and bike boulevard markings provide clear direction to share the road in circumstances where a designated bike lane is not feasible due to road width constraints. • Intersection improvements such as “bike boxes” help to identify placement for cyclists at busy intersections. • Colored bike lanes assist in directing bicycles to a preferred location on the roadway and crosswalks. Appropriate locations include intersections, crosswalks, key connections to destinations and bike paths and in circumstances not easily navigated by bicycle but critical to the Bicycle Network. • A minimum of 5 feet in each direction is needed for a standard bike lane. Given the narrow streets in Lake Forest, very few streets are suitable for bike lanes without signiﬁ cant improvements to widen the road. • Road design should be in compliance with current AASHTO design guidelines included by reference at the end of this plan. A copy of the 1999 Guide is available at the City of Lake Forest. • In areas where only 4 feet are available within the existing roadway, wide shoulders could be incorporated into the Lake Forest street network to provide cyclists with a safe, designated area to share the road with motor vehicles. LOWER FINANCIAL IMPACT 79 PAGE | 29DRAFT SECTION TWO : FRAMEWORK 2-way Side-Path Paths/Trails • Off-road trails are typically located through wooded areas or along railroads and rivers and are excellent for the recreational rider. • A minimum of 10 feet in width with 2 feet of clearance from shrubs and other hazards is recommended. • Signage along trails should be limited with key destination and directional signs installed at access points. • Access to paths and trails should be well marked, free of vegetation and accessible with depressed curbs. • Bike paths should be free of debris and tree roots. • Path lighting should be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission or Building Review Board. • Side-paths are best located along busy streets with limited curb cuts or conﬂ icts with turning vehicles. • Side paths may be appropriate in instances where a bicycle connection is needed and on-road facilities are not desirable or feasible. • A 10-foot minimum width is recommended for a two-way cycle path. In cases where right of way is limited, a two- way path of no less than 8 feet may be considered. • “No Turn on Red” signage is important to protect cyclists traveling along side-paths to avoid conﬂ ict with turning vehicles. • Vegetation may be installed between the road and the bike path but should not block views of cyclists on the path from the drivers on the road. GREATER FINANCIAL IMPACT 80 PAGE | 30 DRAFT SECTION TWO : FRAMEWORK Application of Bicycle Facilities Careful evaluation of the bicycle facilities included in this plan is critical to the success of the bicycle network. Priority should be given to the Core Routes and Branch Connections identiﬁ ed in this plan. Determination of facilities should be based on current road conﬁ guration, current and anticipated use of the corridor, streetscape character and overall consistency with the City’s Capital Improvement Plan. Core Routes are expected to faciliate more bicycle trafﬁ c than Branch Connections. Greater impact facilities such as pavement markings and side paths may be necessitated based on the posted vehicle travel speed and the road conﬁ guration. In situations where a segment of a corridor is proposed for infrastructure improvement, consideration should be given to the entire corridor when choosing a bicycle facility. When possible, on-street facilities should be evaluated in advance of more expensive options such as side paths and off-road trails. Bicycle improvements should correspond with Capital Improvement Projects and speciﬁ c projects may require consideration by City Boards and Commissions in advance of ﬁ nal approval by the City Council. CASE STUDY - WESTLEIGH ROAD A combination of bicycle facilities are appropriate for the Westleigh Road corridor given the difference in road width and number of motor vehicles present on the road between Western Avenue and Waukegan Road. 1. Evaluate Character and Challenges The road and sidewalk conﬁ guration changes along Westleigh Road. The road segment east of Highway 41 has wide lanes and drainage ditches on either side of the road as shown in Figure 23. Sidewalks are found on one or both sides of the street in this area. Extended curbs from side-streets that intersect with Westleigh Road protrude into the existing shoulder on Westleigh Road. The location and possible hazard of these curbs should be evaluated prior to installation of a bicycle facility on this road to determine the necessity of additional roadway improvements. West of Highway 41, Westleigh Road changes to a residential lane with no curb and a sidewalk on the south side of the road. Given the varied character along the route, multiple types of on-road facilities could be appropriate. 2. Determine the Lowest Impact Facility Given the character of the roadway, and the fact that this corridor is a major vehicular route with several cross streets and driveways, on-road bicycle facilities are more appropriate to ensure safety of bicyclists and motorists. The existing sidewalks support pedestrian and younger cyclists along this route. Given the width of the roadway east of HWY 41, pavement markings would be more effective than signage to clearly designate where cyclists should travel on the roadway. Continuation of pavement markings along the entire route is appropriate. FIGURE 23: WESTLEIGH ROAD - EXISTING Wide vehicle travel lanes and a moderate speed limit make Westleigh Road a good option for bicyclists. 81 PAGE | 31DRAFT SECTION TWO : FRAMEWORK Opportunity for a Wide Biking Shoulder on Westleigh Rd. ~4-5 ft Wide Shoulder or Bike Lane Wide Shoulder or Bike Lane ~10-11 ft ~4-5 ft ~10-11 ft Existing Street Configuration on Westleigh Rd. ~15 ft~5 ft ~15 ft ~30 ft Street Width Narrower Travel Lanes Existing Walking Path ~5 ftExisting Walking Path ~30 ft Street Width FIGURE 24: SAMPLE WESTLEIGH ROAD DIET 3. Review National Standards for Bike Facilities The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Ofﬁ cials (AASHTO) regulations require a minimum of 5 feet for a designated bike lane. However, other design standards such as the National Association of City Trafﬁ c Ofﬁ cials (NACTO) Design Guidance for Bike Lanes indicate that a minimum of 4 feet is necessary to safely designate a bike area on the road. Figure 24 demonstrates an example of a “road diet” for Westleigh Road, east of Highway 41. The existing 15 foot wide vehicular travel lanes could be reduced to 10 feet to allow for a bike lane to designate an area for bicyclists. Reducing the width of vehicle travel lanes has been proven to slow trafﬁ c and support adherence to the posted speed limit creating a safer environment for motorists, cyclists, and pedestrians. Alternatively, the travel lanes could be reduced to 11 feet in both directions, more typical of the engineering standards in Lake Forest, to clearly designate an area for motor vehicles and bicycles along a designated bicycle route. The wide shoulder could be utilized for cyclists in this area. Opportunity for Wide Shoulder for Cycling on Westleigh Rd Existing Street Conﬁ guration on Westleigh Rd 82 PAGE | 32 DRAFT SECTION TWO : FRAMEWORK FIGURE 25: SAMPLE WESTLEIGH SHARROW - WEST OF HIGHWAY 41 Before: Narrow lane, no designation for bicyclists After: installation of a sharrow is a cost effective way to designate a road as a preferred bike route. A greater impact solution to improve this route for cycling is to widen the road east of Highway 41 two or more feet to allow for a 5 foot bike lane and wider vehicular travel lanes. The width of the road along Westleigh Road, west of Highway 41, does not support bike lanes or the installation of a wide shoulder given the drainage ditches and surface restraints in this area. Figure 25 provides a graphic representation of how the addition of a “sharrow” designates an area of the roadway for bicycles. Sharrows alert motorists and bicyclists to share the road while preserving the historic character of the roadway. A sharrow implies that bikes will use this route, but cars may have to wait to pass cyclists along this portion of the road since there is not enough roadway for both to travel side by side. In all cases, bicyclists should move to single ﬁ le when a vehicle is present and should not ride more than two abreast. The major intersections along Westleigh Road should be reviewed and updated as appropriate to improve safety and predictability at the crossing. 4. Determine Location of Key Destinations. Westleigh Road is a Branch Connection between Waukegan Road and East Lake Forest. The Skokie Valley Bike Path is easily accessed from Westleigh Road and destination and directional signage would be appropriate along this route. New bicycle signs should utilize existing trafﬁ c signs and poles to limit clutter along the roadways. 5. Obtain Appropriate Permits and Approvals Bike facilities are most cost effective when implemented at the time of a Capital Improvement Project. Depending on the type of project, presentation at a public hearing may be appropriate. Figure 26 establishes a process for review and consideration of bicycle improvements on City streets. 6. Identify Grant Opportunities Several grant opportunities are available for communities that have a Bicycle Master Plan in place. Creating local and regional connections for bicycles is important. A summary of current grant opportunities is provided in Appendix B of this report. 83 PAGE | 33DRAFT SECTION TWO : FRAMEWORK Project Identified Review Bicycle Master Plan Evaluate Lowest Impact Facility (BLOS) Develop Design Concept Key Considerations: •Grant Requirements •Historic District •Streetscape •Impact to Parks •Impact to Trees •Landscaping Bike Connection in Plan Identify Grant Opportunities Project Approval: Hist. Pres. Commission Building Review Board Plan Commission Parks and Recreation City Council Building Permits Bike Connection NOT in Plan FIGURE 26: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT REVIEW PROCESS PROCESS 1. Evaluate which bike facility will maintain a Bicycle Level of Service (BLOS) rating of B or higher on all Core Routes and a rating of C or higher on all Branch Connections. 2. Evaluate facility designs for neighborhood context and immediate surroundings. 3. Evaluate intersections in the context of other bike facilities as well as safety for all modes of transportation. 4. Identify key destinations along route and evaluate availability of bike parking at destinations along the proposed facility. 84 BLANK PAGE DRAFT PLAN MARCH 2013 85 BICYCLE T UNE-UP: BIKE FRIENDLY PLANNING • Engineering • Education • Encouragement • Enforcement and Trafﬁ c Safety • Evaluation and Planning SECTION THREE 86 PAGE | 36 DRAFT SECTION TWO : FRAMEWORK Engineering Priorities 5e’sThe Engineer Educate Encourage Enforce Evaluate Designate Bike Routes Use the ﬁ ve E’s to provide a bike friendly community and support new and experienced riders. TRAIL AND SIDE PATH IMPROVEMENTS • Provide adequate clearance of trees and shrubs along all bike trails and side paths. • Repair damaged pavement along all bike trails and side paths. • Verify that stop signs are present at all major intersections along bike trails and side paths to notify bicyclists to stop at the intersection ahead. • Widen existing Side Path on Waukegan Road to meet minimum standards in plan. POLICY & REGULATORY • Consider requirements to provide bike parking for new businesses. • Install regulatory and directional signs on designated routes. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS • Implement bicycle facilities identiﬁ ed in the Plan. • Maintain roads edge to edge. • Install bike friendly sewer grates along Core Routes and Branch Connections that are ﬂ ush with the pavement and do not create a hazard for cyclists. • Improve road material at railroad crossings to protect bike wheels. • Use non-slip paint for pavement markings. • Prioritize snow removal on Core Routes and Branch Connections. Provide Way-ﬁ nding Signs 87 PAGE | 37DRAFT SECTION TWO : FRAMEWORK ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! # ! # # # # #Trail WayHill St North Ave Old TrlDato AveUniversity AveBroa dle y 's CtW Old Mill RdI 94N RT 4 1 S RT 41 S RIDGE RDW EVERETT RD N WESTERN AVEG REEN BAY RDS OAK KNOLL DRE ILLINOIS RD BUENA R D E WESTLEIGH RD S GREEN BAY RDN MCKI NLEY RDS VALLEY RD W WESTLEIGH RD S BEVERLY PLW OLD ELM RD C STS TIMBER LNPARK LN S ESTATE LND STMUIR AVE F O S T E R A V E E CENTER AVE A R B OR DR E NORTH AVE W CONW A Y RD E W O O D L A N D R D N WASHI NGTON RDS HU N T ER LNAC ADEMY RDW MELLOD Y RD S WAVELAN D RDSMITH AVE H STW GAGE LN E BLODGETT AVE S WES T FORK DRW ARBOR LN W SHERIDAN PL S S U R R E Y LNJ E N KISS ON A V E OAK TERSAFFORD AVE WESTERN AVEE SHERIDAN PL E SPRUCE AV E ARMO UR D RS BUTLE R DRW LAWRENCE AVE NORTH AVES KATHRYN LNQUASSEY AVE CRABTREE LN S CIR CL E LNS M IL L B URNE RDW WI NWOOD DR ARDEN SHORE DR RAVINE AV E W OLD MILL RD E L O N G W OOD DR E F OS T E R PL ATKINSON RD N F O REST VIEW DRBASIL RD E WITCHWOOD LN W BOWL I N G GR E E N D R W WASHINGTON AVE W INVER L I E T H R D RT 176 N RIDGE RDE RYA N PLN EDGEWOOD RDE NILES AVE N F IELD C T W WESTMINSTER E LOC H LN S KURTI S LNN K NOLLWOOD RD E M O R N INGSIDE DR W KOHL AVE PINE CTE HIGHVIEW TER S RO C K EFELLE R R D B STS ASPEN DR E NORTHMOOR RDN BURTON DRZENNI E GREENVIEW PL W ASH LAWN DR S CAM P U S W CENTER AVE ROBINSON D R W LONGMEADOW LN RON A N R D S IG N E C T S FOREST HILL RDSHERWOOD DR W HAWTHORNE CT G STS EVERGREEN DRE WALD E N R DBRYAN W LAKEWOOD DR S CHEROKEE RD N B A Y S H O RE DRMAWMAN AVEW GA V IN CT S FAI RVIE W AVEN WOODBINE PLW WILD ROSE L N E SCOTT STBOBBEW KENNICOTT DR N NORTHSHORE DR N SUSSEX LNFOREST COVE RD S ALEXIS CTN BURR OAK RDE GREEN BRIAR LNOAK AVEW KAJER LN W KIMBE R L Y L N E TURIC U M R D S LOWELL LNW B R O A D L AND L NN HAWTHORNE PLW HERON RDS SAUNDERS RDW A R R I N G TO N DRBIRCH RDS ARCADY DRCA M BR I D G E RD EUCLID AVE E CRABTREE LN S B R O A DSMOORE DRJAMES ST W ANNA LN W KESWICK LN E Q U A IL DRN RT 4 1 I 94S FOREST HILL RDMAWMAN AVEN RT 41 ROCKLAND RD 00.510.25 Miles ´ Route 60 Middlefork Dr Westleigh Rd Old Elm Rd Laurel Ave Mayf lower Deerpath Everett RdConway Farms D rNorth Shore Bike Trail Lake Rd Onwentsia RdAhwanee RdField Dr,To Des Plaines River Trail Robe r t McC lo r y B i k e Pa thMi d d l e f o r k S a v a n n a T r a i l , To Des Plaines River Trail ,To Rou te 20 Bike PathRecommended Bicycle Facilities ,To Chic agoBot ani c Gardens ,To Evanstonand Ch icago , To Des Plaines River Trail ,To Waukeganand Kenosha Telegraph RdWaukegan RdRidge RdFort Sheridan De e rp a th P E M B R O K E D R Lake Bluff Skokie River Forest Preserve Nor th c r of t Pa rk Everett Park Waveland Park South Park De erpat hDerwen Mawr Nature Preserve Deerpath Community Park Skokie Va l l ey B ike Path Cemetery West Skokie River Preserve Everett Farm Melody FarmsTo Abbot t Park and Waukegan, Connect to Bike Bridge Further evaluation and study of selected routes should be completed prior to implementing recommended facility. Intersection improvements may need to be completed in conjunction with the recommended bicycle improvement. Coordinate Path with the Village of BannockburnCoord ina t e Pat h w i th Vi l lage of Lake Blu f f Bike Lane or Wide Shoulder Trail Access Points (Existing) Protected Bike Lane or Separated Bike Path Existing Trail #Metra Stations ! Sharrow Signed Bike Route Recommended Bike Facilities: Route priorities are identiﬁ ed in Appendix D. FIGURE 27: RECOMMENDED BICYCLE FACILITIES 88 PAGE | 38 DRAFT SECTION THREE: BICYCLE TUNE-UP Education & Trafﬁ c Safety Be Predictable! Share the Road! Engineer Educate Encourage Enforce Evaluate Source: City of Lawrence, KS (www.lawrenceks.org) 5e’sThe Use the ﬁ ve E’s to provide a bike friendly community and support new and experienced riders. ACTION STEPS • Provide access to rules of the road on City Website and distribute Trafﬁ c Safety Cards. • Establish Police Community Training Events and presentations to students in the schools. • Educate Police Ofﬁ cers and post current bicycling regulations at the Public Safety Building. • Encourage driver education programs to include lessons on how to share the road as a driver and a cyclist. • Sponsor Bike Rodeos for young children on an annual basis. • Encourage local bike shops and advocates to provide bicycle maintainance classes for students and adults. • Support the establishment of Bike Clubs in the community including the schools, Senior Center, and CROYA. • Remind riders and drivers of the rules of the road annually in the Spring issue of the Dialogue! An important component of the Bicycle Master Plan is education. Educating bicyclists on how to ride when cars are present and motorists on how to coexist on the road with bicyclists will help encourage people to ride more and drive less. There are several resources available that provide access to the rules of the road to provide clear expectations of how all modes of transportation will behave on the street. 89 PAGE | 39DRAFT SECTION THREE: BICYCLE TUNE-UP Encouragement Engineer Educate Encourage Enforce Evaluate Perks for bikes! Explore Lake Forest! 5e’sThe Use the ﬁ ve E’s to provide a bike friendly community and support new and experienced riders. In order to encourage more people to ride bicycles in Lake Forest and promote healthy lifestyles, The City supports and encourages community events and facilities that promote bicycling. All special events should follow standard City procedures and obtain the appropriate approvals in advance. POSSIBLE ACTIVITIES TO ENCOURAGE BICYCLING • Community Bike Rides – coordinate with local bike clubs and stores. • Bike to School/Work Days – coordinate with schools and Lake Forest High School Environmental Club. • Discounts Days for bicyclists – coordinate with the Chamber of Commerce and the City’s Economic Development Coordinator. • Bike and Dine Events – coordinate with Chamber of Commerce and the City’s Economic Development Coordinator. • Temporary Bike Corrals in the Central Business District during the summer and at special events such as the Fourth of July Fireworks and Saturday morning Farmer’s Market. • “Bike Sheridan Road” or “Bike the Square” events where the roads are closed to cars for a morning to allow bicyclists to experience the roads car-free. 90 PAGE | 40 DRAFT SECTION THREE: BICYCLE TUNE-UP Enforcement Engineer Educate Encourage Enforce Evaluate 5e’sThe Use the ﬁ ve E’s to provide a bike friendly community and support new and experienced riders. The Lake Forest Police Department played an active role in the development of this plan. The Police Department already utilizes bicycle patrol in Lake Forest and continues to set an example of how to follow the “rules of the road” while cycling on the streets. • Obey trafﬁ c laws, signs and signals. • Ride in the right lane, except when passing another vehicle, preparing for a left turn or avoiding hazards. • Ride on paved shoulders and bike lanes when present and free of hazards. • Ride on the right, never ride against trafﬁ c. • Ride no more than two abreast, returning to single-ﬁ le if riding two abreast impedes the ﬂ ow of trafﬁ c. • Use hand signals to indicate right or left turns, slowing or stopping. • Use a headlight, taillight and reﬂ ectors at night. • Act like a vehicle on the roads -- bicycles have the same rights and responsibilities. • Never assume motorists see you or that you have the right-of-way. • Wear appropriate gear to protect yourself: helmet, glasses and gloves. RULES OF THE ROAD - THE BASICS Be Safe! Know the Rules! 91 PAGE | 41DRAFT SECTION THREE: BICYCLE TUNE-UP Evaluation and Planning Engineer Educate Encourage Enforce Evaluate 5e’sThe Use the ﬁ ve E’s to provide a bike friendly community and support new and experienced riders. The Bicycle Master Plan is not a static document but should be evaluated every 5 years to ensure consistency with current trends and that the improvements are meeting the needs of residents. The Bicycle Level of Service tool and other resources identiﬁ ed in Appendix B should be used to evaluate bicycle routes and help to inform the design of proposed modiﬁ cations to increase the bicycle compatibility of a route. ACTION STEPS • Add 15 miles of designated bicycle routes in Lake Forest by 2025. • Install “Share the Road” signage on all designated routes to raise awareness of bicycling in Lake Forest. • Maintain a bicycling section on the City of Lake Forest Website to serve as an information source for residents and visitors including a feedback form. • Actively seek grant funding sources for projects. A list of current grant opportunities is included as Appendix B. • Prepare an annual report to the City Council on the progress of implementing bicycling improvements, give a review of bicycle crashes and establish priorities for the coming year to continue to improve safety and conditions for bicycling. WHAT MAKES LAKE FOREST A BIKE FRIENDLY PLACE? Bicycle parking at k e y destinations Safe intersection cros s i n g s f o r a l l m o d e s o f transportation Smooth roads Covered bike parking at train stations and key employment hubs for commuters Traf ﬁ c regulations that support bicycle use Bike lanes and pavement markings to alert bicyclists and motorists to share the road Way-ﬁ nding signage to help cyclists ﬁ nd key destinations Making all drivew a y s a t r a i l h e a d a n d using the roads t o a c c e s s d e s i g n a t e d bike trails 92 BLANK PAGE DRAFT PLAN MARCH 2013 93 APPENDICES: • Appendix A: Community Survey Summary • Appendix B: Resources • Appendix C: Deﬁ nitions • Appendix D: Engineering Priorities SECTION FOUR 94 PAGE | 44 DRAFT APPENDIX Appendix A: Community Survey Summary 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% Narrow vehicle travel lanes Unclear/unknown traffic rules and regulations pertaining to bikes Volume of cyclists on the road Limited visibility of cyclistsPercent of Respondents 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Bike lanes on roads Paved paths along roads physically separated from motor traffic Paved shoulders on roads Wide shoulders on roads Signed bike routes on roads Education for motorists on how to deal with bicyclists in traffic Increased inforcement of traffic laws Wide vehicle travel lanes "Share the Road" signage Education for bicyclists on how to deal with motor traffic Secure bike parking at destinations More trail amenities (bike racks, benches, restrooms, etc.) Significant increase in cost of driving Number of Responses Not Important Moderately Important Extremely Important 1. When driving on streets where cyclists are present, what challenges currently exist in Lake Forest? 2. Which conditions would encourage you to bike more than you do today? Most of the respondents indicated that they would be “extremely” or “moderately” encouraged to ride more often if there were marked bike lanes on the roads. The majority also indicated that paved or wide shoulders on roads would also encourage them to ride more often. Many indicated that signed bike routes, education of motorists and cyclists and increased enforcement of trafﬁ c rules would be encouraging as well. Seventy-eight percent of respondents indicated that narrow vehicle travel lanes are an issue in Lake Forest when it comes to driving on streets where cyclists are present. Respondents identiﬁ ed unclear or unknown trafﬁ c rules and regulations pertaining to bikes as the second most common issue. 95 PAGE | 45DRAFT APPENDIX 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% Yes No 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% Yes NoPercent of Respondents 3. Do you think it is important for bike routes in Lake Forest to provide connectivity beyond city boundaries? 4. Do the existing bike facilities in Lake Forest provide adequate connectivity within Lake Forest? The majority of respondents (71%) indicated that Lake Forest does not provide adequate connectivity within the City. Over 85% of respondents indicated that it is important that bike routes connect Lake Forest to destinations beyond the City limits. 96 PAGE | 46 DRAFT APPENDIX 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0% Excellent Good Fair PoorPercent of Responses 84.5% 15.5% Yes No 5. What is your opinion of availability of bike trails and paths in Lake Forest? 6. Would you take longer routes to your destination in order to use bike facilities? Forty-ﬁ ve percent of respondents indicated that the availability of bike trails and bike paths in Lake Forest is only fair; while 39% indicated that the availability is good. 97 PAGE | 47DRAFT APPENDIX 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 Number of Responses Extremely Discouraging Moderately Discouraging Not Discouraging 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 3-5 miles More than 10 miles 0-2 miles 6-10 miles 7. Which situation discourages you from riding a bike more often or from not riding at all? 8. How many miles do you typically ride your bike during a single trip? Responses to the survey indicate that bikes are used in Lake Forest for a variety of trips including recreation purposes and exercise, commuting, and to run errands. Over 30% of respondents indicated that they ride 3-5 miles during a single trip and 28 % ride more than 10 miles for a typical ride. Responses to the survey indicate that cyclists are more discouraged from riding more by unsafe road conditions, the speed and volume of motor vehicles, and the lack of bike facilities. Lack of secure bike parking also discourages a large percentage of cyclists. Seceral responses also indicate concerns about the speed and volume of other cyclists. 98 PAGE | 48 DRAFT APPENDIX 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% Member of a bicycle team or club Cheaper than using a car Commuting to work/school Destinations (Errands/Shopping) Health and Exercise Recreation Percent of Responses 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0% Daily 1-3 times per week 1-3 times per month Less than once a month NeverPercent of Responses November to April May to October 9. Why do you ride your bike? 10. How often do you ride your bike in Lake Forest? Most respondents who live, work or attend school in Lake Forest indicated that they bike for health and exercise as well as for recreation. Almost 50% of respondents indicated that they also ride their bikes to run errands or to go shopping. Twenty six percent of respondents indicated that they use their bikes to get to and from work or school. Most respondents indicate that they ride their bikes in Lake Forest more often during the warmer months of May to October than November to April. However, over 15% of respondents indicate that they still ride their bikes 1-3 times per week during the winter months and 24% ride 1-3 times per month during that time. Fifteen percent of respondents ride their bikes daily during the warmer part of the year. Thirty-two percent of the total “daily” riders cycle for the purpose of getting to and from school. 99 PAGE | 49DRAFT APPENDIX 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0% Casual Intermediate ExpertPercent of Responses 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% A Lake Forest Resident Attending School in Lake Forest A Resident of Another North Shore Community Employed in Lake ForestPercent of Respondents 11. What do you consider your level of biking experience? 12. Are you... Most respondents were of “intermediate” or “casual” level of experience (45% and 35% respectively). The majority, 66%, of respondents were Lake Forest residents. Nineteen percent of respondents attend school in Lake Forest. 100 PAGE | 50 DRAFT APPENDIX 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 15 and under 16-25 26-35 36-45 46-55 56-65 66 or upPercent of Responses Respondent Age Respondent Age 13. Respondent Age 393 people responded to the Bicycle Master Plan Survey. The highest response came from people aged 36-45 (almost 30%). The second largest group of respondents were aged 16-25 and represented 19% of the total responses. 101 PAGE | 51DRAFT APPENDIX Appendix B: Resources DESIGN CRITERIA The proposed planning and design of the routes identiﬁ ed in the Bicycle Master Plan should follow the industry standards and accepted design guidelines in the State of Illinois. The following manuals, as updated by the State, or Advocacy Groups should be consulted as part of the implementation of any new bicycle facililty. • Active Transportation Alliance • Bicycle Parking Guidelines - Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals • Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities - AASHTO, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Ofﬁ cials • Illinois Bicycle Rules of the Road - Secretary of State • League of Illinois Bicyclists (LIB) • League of American Bicyclists (LAB) • Manual on Uniform Trafﬁ c Control Devices, Part 9 - Federal Highway Adminstration, U.S. Department of Transportation • Urban Bikeway Design Guide - NACTO, National Association of City Transportation Ofﬁ cials Surface Transportation Program (STP)Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)Safe Routes to School Program (SRTS)Transportation Enhancement Activities (TEA)Congestion Mitigation/Air Quality Program (SMAQ)Recreational Trails Program (RTP)Federal Transit Administration Capital Funds (FTA)Transit Enhancements (TE)Bridge (BRI)State and Community Traffic Safety Program (402)State/Metropolitan Planning Funds (PLA)Transportation and Community and System Preservation Pilot Program (TCSP)Access to Jobs/Reverse Commute Program (JOBS)Federal Lands Highway Program (FLH)Scenic Byways (BYW)Bicycle lanes on roadway ***** **** ** Paved Shoulders ******* ** Signed bike route * *** ** ** Shared use path/transportation trail ******* ** ** Recreational trail *** Spot improvement program ***** ** Maps **** * * Bicycle parking facilities * *** **** Bicycle share (capital costs only, operations not eligible) Bicycle storage/service center * *** *** * Sidewalks, new or retrofit ***** **** ** Crosswalks, new or retrofit ***** *** ** Trail/highway intersection ******* ** Signal improvements ***** ** Curb cuts and ramps ***** ** Traffic calming ***** Safety/education position *** Police Patrol ** Helmet Promotion **** Safety brochure/book * ***** Training * ***** http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bicycle_pedestrian/guidance/bp-guid.cfm#bp4 Source: "FHWA Guidance - (Updated October 22, 2008) Bicycle and Pedestrian Provisions of Federal Transportation Legislation" ******** FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES (REVISED A PRIL 2012) 102 PAGE | 52 DRAFT APPENDIX Appendix C: Deﬁ nitions AASHTO (AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS) A nonproﬁ t organization representing highway and transportation departments in the US with a goal to foster the development, operation, and maintenance of an integrated national transportation system. ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION A form of travel that is powered by the human body. Most popular active modes of transportation are cycling and walking, but also includes in-line skating, using a wheelchair, riding a skateboard, cross country skiing, canoeing and kayaking. ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION A type of transportation that does not utilize the use of a private car such as bicycling or riding a train. BICYCLE (BIKE) FACILITY Improvements and provisions made to accommodate or encourage bicycling such as: new or improved lanes, path or shoulders for the use of bicyclists, trafﬁ c control devices, shelters and parking facilities for bicycles. BICYCLE LEVEL OF SERVICE (BLOS) A nationally recognized measure of on-road bicyclist comfort level as a function of a roadway’s geometry and trafﬁ c conditions as developed by the League of Illinois Bicyclists. BICYCLE PARKING: Infrastructure speciﬁ cally designed for the safe parking of bicycles. BICYCLE (BIKE) ROUTE - Signed: A roadway designated as preferential for bicycle use by adding “bike route” signs, without providing other speciﬁ c bicycle facilities. BIKE BOX: A colored area at a signalized intersection that allows bicyclists to pull in front of waiting trafﬁ c. Designed to be used only at red lights, the box is intended to reduce car-bike conﬂ icts, increase cyclist visibility and provide bicyclists with a head start when the light turns green. Of particular concern is the “right hook” collision that can happen when drivers turn right as a bicycle starts straight through an intersection. Bike boxes have been shown to be most effective when paired with a brightly colored bike lane that extends through the intersection, to remind motorists that cyclists may be traveling straight. BIKE LANE: Portion of a roadway which has been designated by pavement markings for the preferential or exclusive use of bicyclists. BIKE TRAIL: A bikeway physically separated from motorized vehicular trafﬁ c by an open space or barrier. COMPLETE STREET: A street that is designed for all users alike: motor vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists. IDOT: Illinois Department of Transportation. 103 PAGE | 53DRAFT APPENDIX LANE (TRAVEL) Lanes on the road designated for vehicular trafﬁ c LEAGUE OF ILLINOIS BICYCLISTS (LIB): A not-for-proﬁ t organization dedicated to improving bicycling conditions in Illinois and a statewide advocate for all Illinois bicyclists, promoting bicycle access, education, and safety. LIMITED ACCESS ROADWAY: A highway or arterial road for high-speed trafﬁ c with limited or no access to adjacent property, some degree of separation of opposing trafﬁ c ﬂ ow, use of grade separated interchanges to some extent, prohibition of some modes of transport such as bicycles or horses and very few or no intersecting cross-streets. MODE-SHIFT: Transitions from one mode of transportation to the other as the advantages are acknowledged. NACTO: National Association of City Transportation Ofﬁ cials. A coalition of several US largest cities with a mission to ”encourage the exchange of transportation ideas, insights and practices among large cities while advocating for a federal transportation policy that prioritizes investment in infrastructure in the nation’s large cities and metropolitan areas.” PAVEMENT SENSORS: Sensors embedded in the pavement of the road triggering trafﬁ c signals to change. Many pavement sensors are not sensitive to bikes. UTILITARIAN USE OF A BIKE FACILITY: The use of a bike facility for the purpose of transportation such as commuting or running errands rather than for recreation. ROAD DIET: Reducing the width of a vehicle travel lane to accommodate bicycle improvements. SHARROW: A street marking installed just right of center in a vehicle travel lane to indicate an area for bicyclists. Sharrows are used when vehicle lane width is not great enough to allow a car and bike to move side by side. Cars passing bicycles on a route with sharrows may need to cross the road centerline when on-coming trafﬁ c has cleared to move around the cyclist. SHOULDER: The portion of the roadway contiguous with the traveled way for accommodation of stopped vehicles. Shoulders are recognized as the best way to accommodate bicyclists in rural areas. TRAFFIC VOLUME: The average amount of trafﬁ c passing on a street measured in Average Annual Daily Traf ﬁ c Count (AADT or ADT), which is the average number of cars per day on a given section of a road. AADT is reported as one number, indicating both lanes of trafﬁ c combined or as two numbers, one for each lane of trafﬁ c. Low = Under 2,000 AADT; Medium = 2,000 to 10,000 AADT; High = Over 10,000 AADT. 104 PAGE | 54 DRAFT APPENDIX High Med. Low ImprovebicyclecrossingattheintersectionswithHWY41andRoute43 byincorporatingbikeboxesandsensors.X Improvetheroadwaysurfaceconditions.X Replaceexistingsignageandinstallupdatedsignage.X InstallSharrows.X ImprovebicyclecrossingattheintersectionswithHWY41andRoute43 byincorporatingbikeboxesandsensors.X InstallsharrowsbetweenHWY41andWaukeganRoad.X InstallSharetheRoadsignage.X Improvetheroadwaysurfaceconditions.X "RoadDiet"betweenRoute41andWesternAvetoprovideawide shoulder/bikelaneforbicyclists.X CoordinatewithStateauthoritiesandsurroundinglandholdersto developavisionforRoute60corridorandthesurroundingconnection opportunitiesincludingarailroadcrossingnorthofRoute60. X ImprovebicyclecrossingattheintersectionswithRoute43bysensors andpavementmarkingsatcrossing.X ImproveintersectionwithGreenBayRoad.X InstallwayfindingsignageonWesternAvetoWoodlandRdtoprovidea connectiontotheRobertMcCloryBikePath.X Improvetheroadwaysurfaceconditions.X InstallwayfindingsignagealongLaurelAve.X ImprovebicyclecrossingattheintersectionswithRoute43by incorporatingbikeboxes.X ImproveintersectionwithHWY41.X InstallSharrows.X Improvetheroadwaysurfaceconditions.X ProvideconnectiontoMiddleforkSavannaTrail.X Installwayfindingsignageshowingalternativeroutealong Ahwanee/Onwentsia.X Installwayfindingsignageand"BikeRoute"signs.X ProvideimprovedbicycleparkingatForestPark.X Improvetheroadwaysurfaceconditions.X Installwayfindingsignageand"BikeRoute"signs.X Improvetheroadwaysurfaceconditions.X Route60(Route41toTollway) Connection Improvement/BicycleFacility PriorityLevel Everett/OldElmRoads(Fort SheridantoWestMetraStationand IͲ94Overpass) WestleighRd LaurelAve(RobertMcCloryBike PathtoSkokieValleyBikePath) Deerpath(SkokieValleyBikePathto MiddleforkSavannaTrail) Deerpath(RobertMcCloryBikePath toForestPark) OnwentsiaͲAhwanee Appendix D: Engineering Priorities 105 PAGE | 55DRAFT APPENDIX High Med. Low Installwayfindingsignageand"BikeRoute"signs.X Improvetheroadwaysurfaceconditions.X Installwayfindingsignageand"BikeRoute"signs.X Improvetheroadwaysurfaceconditions.X Installsharrows.X Installwayfindingsignageand"BikeRoute"signs.X Improvetheroadwaysurfaceconditions.X Providebicycleparkingatofficebuildings.X Installwayfindingsignageand"BikeRoute"signs.X Improvetheroadwaysurfaceconditions.X Installwayfindingsignageand"BikeRoute"signs.X Improvetheroadwaysurfaceconditions.X Installwayfindingsignageand"BikeRoute"signs.X Improvetheroadwaysurfaceconditions.X Coordinateregionalconnectionswithstateauthorities,VillageofLake Bluff,VillageofBannockburnandsurroundinglandownersX Providewayfindingsignage.X ModifyexistingsidepathtomeetstandardsoutlinedintheBicycle MasterPlan.X Improvethepathwaysurfaceconditions.X ProvideamultiͲuseconnectionbetweenIllinoisandWoodlandRoads. X Providewayfindingsignage.X Clearpathwayofbrushandvegetationthatrestrictsvisibilityandis hazardoustotrailusers.X Improvethepathwaysurfaceconditions.X Providewayfindingsignage.X Clearpathwayofbrushandvegetationthatrestrictsvisibilityandis hazardoustotrailusers.X RidgeRd(SkokieValleyBikePathto SeniorCenterandNorthcroftPark) WaukeganRd(LakeBluffͲLake ForestBannockͲConnection) RobertMcCloryBikePath SkokieValleyBikePath PriorityLevel LakeandRavineTour(RingwoodͲ MayflowerͲSpringͲLakeͲSpruceͲ McCloryBikePath) ConwayFarms(EverettRdtoRoute 60) FieldDrive(Route60toMunicipal ServicesBuilding) MiddleforkDrive(WaukeganRd.to MiddleforkSavannaTrail) TelegraphRoad(WestLakeForest TrainStationSouthtoBannockburn) Improvement/BicycleFacilityConnection 106 BLANK PAGE DRAFT PLAN MARCH 2013 107 Keep on Pedaling! 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST ORDINANCE NO. _________ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2-65 OF THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST Adopted by the Mayor and City Council of The City of Lake Forest this __th day of ______, 2013. Published in pamphlet form by direction And authority of The City of Lake Forest Lake County, Illinois this __th day of ________, 2013. 115 THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST ORDINANCE NO. _________ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2-65 OF THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST WHEREAS, under Article IV, Section 9 of the City Charter, the Mayor and Aldermen of the City are deemed to be conservators of the peace; and WHEREAS, Section 2-65 of the City Code also provides that the Mayor and Aldermen of the City are deemed to be conservators of the peace; and WHEREAS, pursuant to P.A. 90-540, the Illinois General Assembly amended Section 3.1-15-25 of the Illinois Municipal Code, 65 ILCS 5/3.1-15-25, to require mayors and aldermen to successfully complete a training course administered by the Illinois Law Enforcement Training Standards Board in order to exercise the power of arrest as a conservator of the peace; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined, pursuant to its home rule authority, that the requirements of P.A. 90-540 are appropriate standards for the exercise of the power of arrest and therefore are in the best interests of the City and its residents to adopt this Ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, COUNTY OF LAKE, STATE OF ILLINOIS, as follows: SECTION ONE: Recitals. The foregoing recitals are incorporated as the findings of the City Council and are hereby incorporated into and made a part of this Ordinance. SECTION TWO: Amendment to Section 2-65 of the City Code. Section 2-65, entitled "Arrests," of Article IV, entitled "Officers and Employees Generally," of Chapter 2, entitled "Administration," of the Lake Forest City Code is hereby amended in its entirety, so that such Section 2-65 of the City Code shall hereafter be and read as follows: Sec. 2-65. ARRESTS--- (a) Subject to the requirements of Section 2-65(b), the The Mayor and the members of the City Council, as well as every member of the police 116 department, are hereby declared to be conservators of the peace with such powers to make arrests as are given to the conservators of the peace by statute. (b) Only after receiving a certificate attesting to the successful completion of a training course administered by the Illinois Law Enforcement Training Standards Board, may the mayor, aldermen, or sworn members of the police department have power (i) to arrest or cause to be arrested, with or without process, all persons who break the peace or are found violating any municipal ordinance or any criminal law of the State, (ii) to commit arrested persons for examination, (iii) if necessary, to detain arrested persons in custody over night or Sunday in any safe place or until they can be brought before the proper court, and (iv) to exercise all other powers as conservators of the peace prescribed by this Code or State statute. SECTION THREE: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. Passed this ____ day of _________________________, 2013 AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Approved this __ day of _________________________, 2013 _____________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk 117