CITY COUNCIL 2013/04/15 Agenda
THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Monday, April 15, 2013 7:30 p.m.
City Hall Council Chambers
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 7:30 p.m.
Honorable Donald Schoenheider, Acting Mayor
Kent Novit, Alderman First Ward Jack Reisenberg, Alderman Third Ward
Catherine Waldeck, Alderman First Ward Stanford Tack, Alderman Third Ward
David Moore, Alderman Second Ward Robert Palmer, Alderman Fourth Ward
George Pandaleon, Alderman Second Ward Michael Adelman, Alderman Fourth Ward
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS 7:35 p.m.
1. Comments by Mayor
A. Appointment of Holly Brown as Chairman to the ELAWA Farm Commission
B. Appointment of Georgia West to the ELAWA Farm Commission
A copy of the Volunteer Profile sheet begins on page 22.
C. Proclamation for Arbor Day April 26,2013
A copy of the Proclamation is on page 25.
2. Comments by City Manager 7:40 p.m.
3. Comments by Council Members 8:00 p.m.
A. Finance Committee Report
1. GFOA Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting for FY12
CAFR
PRESENTED BY: Elizabeth Holleb, Finance Director (847)810-3612
The City of Lake Forest has been notified by the Government Finance Officers
Association (GFOA) that it has been recognized for the 34 years in a row in
receipt of the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting
for the FY 12 Audit (CAFR). Assistant Finance Director Diane Hall deserves
special credit or preparing the CAFR. A copy of the letter can be found on
page 26.
1
April 15, 2013 Agenda
2. Consideration of an Ordinance approving a Fee Schedule for The City of Lake
Forest Relating to Water Rates. (First Reading and Final Approval)
PRESENTED BY: Elizabeth Holleb, Finance Director (847-810-3612)
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Staff requests first reading and final approval of an
Ordinance approving a modified fee schedule for The City of Lake Forest.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: As discussed at the February 19 and March 18 Finance
Committee meetings, it is recommended to increase water rates by 3.00% effective May
1, 2013. For customers inside the City, the rate would increase from $4.99 to $5.14/1000
gallons and for customers outside the City, the rate would increase from $6.85 to
$7.06/1000 gallons. The proposed rate increase will ensure proper funding of the FY14
water fund operating budget and the water fund Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
The attached survey on page 27 demonstrates that The City of Lake Forest’s rate
structure continues to be competitive with surrounding communities.
BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed rate increase is projected to generate $172,791 in
additional revenue for Fiscal Year 2014, based on a five-year historical average of water
consumption.
The projected increase in cost for typical consumers annually is as follows:
• Single resident with minimal summer landscape water consumption - $6.14/year
• Family with summer landscape water consumption - $31.82/year
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Waive First Reading and grant final approval of the ordinance
(page 28) approving a fee schedule for The City of Lake Forest.
B. Public Works Committee Report
1. Electric Vehicle Discussion
A copy of the memo is attached on page 49.
2. Appointment and Approval of a Three-Year Engineering Services Agreement
for the City Surveyor and Engineer
Staff Contact: Michael Thomas, Director of Public Works (810-3540)
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Staff is requesting appointment and approval of a
three year agreement with GeWalt Hamilton to provide engineering services through
April 30, 2016.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: At the October 15, 2012 City Council meeting, staff
requested approval of an agreement with GeWalt Hamilton to provide engineering
services to the City. The agreement was approved for services through May 6, 2013.
2
April 15, 2013 Agenda
From October 16, 2012 through February 24, 2013, the City has spent $8,139 for 77 hours of
engineering services. Staff anticipates using approximately 30 additional hours for the
months of March and April at an estimated expense of $3,120.
The City Surveyor and Engineer is needed to fulfill all statutory requirements and assist with
plan reviews for watershed development, commercial development, and IEPA / IDOT
permits. Recent plan reviews have primarily focused on applications that fall under the
regulations of the Watershed Development Ordinance governed by the Lake County
Stormwater Management Commission. In addition, GeWalt Hamilton spent time
reviewing plans for Forest Park, the proposed Route 60 Median Project, and most
recently, the City’s watermain study. The assigned engineer from GeWalt Hamilton has
been extremely responsive and has been able to participate in a multitude of meetings
requested of him. Staff has been very pleased with the engineer’s quality of work as well.
BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT: GeWalt Hamilton has proposed to hold their current rates
through April 30, 2014. Beginning in F.Y. 2015 their rates would increase approximately 4%
but would hold through April 30, 2016. Attached on page 53 is the draft agreement.
Staff’s estimates professional engineering services not to exceed 200 hours per year and
has budgeted accordingly in the F.Y. 2014 operating budget.
As noted in the original interview process, Gewalt Hamilton intends on performing
engineering services for all current and future Lake Forest College development. If/when
such applications are made, staff recommends that such plans be reviewed by Bleck
Engineering as the City’s secondary engineering firm.
Additionally Gewalt Hamilton Associates pledged not to perform any other engineering
services for private Lake Forest clients while working as the role of City Surveyor and
Engineer. Gewalt Hamilton personnel reviewed and acknowledged receipt of the City’s
“Gift Ban Act and Ethics Ordinance”.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Appoint and approve a three year agreement for the City
Surveyor & Engineer to Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. through April 30, 2016. Bleck
Engineering will be appointed as the City’s secondary engineering firm if / when private
engineering plans within Lake Forest are received from Gewalt Hamilton Associates.
OPPORTUNITY FOR CITIZENS TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
ITEMS FOR OMNIBUS VOTE CONSIDERATION 8:30 p.m.
1. Approval of the March 18, 2013 regular City Council minutes
Copy of the minutes are attached beginning on page 67.
2. Check Register For Period February 23 - March 22, 2013
Fund Invoice Payroll Total
3
April 15, 2013 Agenda
General 458,875 1,063,663 1,522,538
Water & Sewer 61,604 107,841 169,445
Parks & Recreation 146,435 290,723 437,158
Capital
Improvements 21,266 657 21,923
Bond Funds -
Projects 0 0 0
Motor Fuel Tax 30,374 0 30,374
Cemetery 7,265 13,936 21,201
Senior Resources 12,364 18,446 30,810
Deerpath Golf
Course 53,864 14,867 68,731
Fleet 95,789 36,989 132,779
Debt Funds 500 0 500
Housing Trust 0 0 0
Park & Public Land 0 0 0
All other Funds 282,304 139,185 421,489
$1,170,641
$1,686,307 $ 2,856,947
3. Approval of a Resolution Reallocating 2013 Volume Cap to the Village of Buffalo
Grove, Illinois
Staff Contact: Elizabeth Holleb, Finance Director (847-810-3612)
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Staff requests approval of a resolution reallocating the
City’s 2013 private activity bond volume cap to the Village of Buffalo Grove, Illinois for the
private activity bond clearinghouse (PABC) pool, as recommended by the City Council
Finance Committee.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Federal Tax Reform Act of 1986 imposes a limit on the
aggregate amount of “tax exempt private activity” bonds (also known as volume cap)
that can be issued by a State. Pursuant to these federal regulations, the State of Illinois
has developed a formula by which the State ceiling is allocated among governmental
units in the State having authority to issue such bonds.
The Illinois Private Activity Bond Allocation Act provides that a home rule unit of
government is allocated an amount equal to $95 multiplied by its estimated population,
which for Lake Forest in calendar year 2013 is $1,847,560 (19,448 x $95). By May 1, 2013,
the City must take action to grant, reserve or transfer its allocation, or the amount is
reserved by the Governor’s Office for a pool. The City may transfer its allocation to any
other home rule unit of government, the State of Illinois or any agency of the State.
This year, the City has received one request to transfer its volume cap, as follows:
Organization Proposed Use Amount of Transfer Fee
Village of Buffalo Grove
(Lake County Partners)
Private Activity Bond
Clearinghouse
0.5% or $9,237.80*
4
April 15, 2013 Agenda
* Paid upon issuance of bonds utilizing the allocated volume cap
Home rule units are not prohibited from charging a fee for transferring their cap. In prior
years when economic conditions were more favorable, home rule units were able to
induce developers to pay a higher transfer fee than that offered by Lake County
Partners. In recent years, however, fewer developers have sought the volume cap due
to low interest rates and declines in development activity.
Because the volume cap amount for most municipalities is too small to assist with eligible
projects, Lake County Partners created the Clearinghouse in 2000 as a way for Lake
County communities to pool their cap and make best use of the allocation locally. Lake
County Partners reports that in the past several years, they have seen little activity in the
private activity bond market, but they are currently working with a potential bond
application at this time. Since its inception, the clearinghouse has funded nearly $200
million in local projects, including the construction of 360,000 square feet of new
manufacturing space, creation of 648 new manufacturing jobs, renovation of 1,600 multi-
family dwelling units, purchase of an estimated 251 homes by “first-time homebuyers”,
expansion of a Montessori School, and construction of a new solid waste disposal “cell”.
This is the eighth year under home rule status that the City has been allocated volume
cap. The City has transferred its volume cap to Buffalo Grove for the past six years. To
date, fee income of $8,574.78 has been received.
BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT: Upon issuance of bonds utilizing the City’s volume cap, a transfer
fee payment of .5% would be due to the City. Should the entire 2013 allocation be
utilized by the pool, the City would receive $9,237.80.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approval of a Resolution (page 73) Reallocating 2013 Volume
Cap to the Village of Buffalo Grove, Illinois.
4. Approval of a Contract for Annual Recreation and Croya Transportation Services
Staff Contact: ANTHONY ANASZEWICZ, PROGRAM MANAGER, 810-3941
TODD NAHIGIAN, CROYA MANAGER, 847-810-3982
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Staff requests approval to award a three year
agreement for summer Recreation transportation services to Olson Transportation and
reject the CROYA bus portion of the bid.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The City of Lake Forest’s Recreation Department uses school
buses for their summer camps and the CROYA Department uses them throughout the
year for their monthly trips and retreats. The summer camps provide daily transportation
to all Lake Forest residents enrolled in Superstars Day Camp, McCormick Day Camp as
well as all daily afternoon swim shuttles and field trip bussing for various camps.
CROYA uses school busses for destination based monthly field trips and retreats
throughout the year for middle school and high school students as part of their programs.
5
April 15, 2013 Agenda
Under the City’s financial policies and in an attempt to secure best pricing for these two
city departments, the bus transportation needs were put through the formal bid process
in March 2013 for a three year service agreement. A three-year agreement is
advantageous to lock in future expense and maximize service delivery due to familiarity
with camp schedules and City streets. Public notice to solicit bids was provided on
February 14th, 2013 with a bid opening date of March 1st, 2013. The chosen timetable was
driven by the summer camp schedule in order to prepare the routes for the upcoming
camp programs and distribute them to our participants.
Staff recommends awarding a three-year agreement for services for the Recreation
Department portion to Olson Transportation as the lowest bidder for Recreation services.
Staff recommends rejecting the CROYA portion of the bid from all three companies. This
recommendation is based on the knowledge that the bid specifications for the CROYA
excursions may have lacked some pertinent information that produced inconsistent bids
results. CROYA will seek new quotes, following the City purchasing policies, with better
defined specifications for their bus service needs.
BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for the Recreation Department’s camp bussing is
budgeted in Fund 220 operating budgets and is paid for by program fees. Staff received
three (3) bids for the annual program bus service as detailed below.
Bus Bid Data Overview:
Olson
Transportation
Durham School Services First Student
Recreation Dept.
FY '14 $ 39,887.00 $ 40,572.00 $ 43,250.00
FY '15 $ 40,684.74 $ 41,384.40 $ 44,114.60
FY '16 $ 41,496.51 $ 42,213.45 $ 44,996.82
Total $ 122,068.25 $ 124,169.85 $ 132,361.42
CROYA
FY '14 $ 6,830.00 $ 3,600.00 $ 3,360.00
FY '15 $ 6,830.00 $ 3,672.00 $ 3,425.40
FY '16 $ 7,055.00 $ 3,745.44 $ 3,495.84
Total $ 20,715.00 $ 11,017.44 $ 10,281.24
Summary of Project Budget:
FY ’14 – FY ‘16
Funding Source
Amount Budgeted Amount Requested Budgeted?
Y/N
Recreation
Department
Operating Fund 220
$ 134,700.00 $ 122,068.25 Y
CROYA Operating
Fund
N/A N/A N/A
6
April 15, 2013 Agenda
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve a three year contract with Olson Transportation for the
Recreation Department bus services in the total amount of $122,068.25 and reject the bid
for CROYA bus service.
5. Approval of a Contract with Konica Minolta for the Purchase of Four Multifunction
Copy Machines.
Staff Contact: Carina Walters, Assistant City Manager (847) 810-3680
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Staff is seeking City Council approval to enter into a
contract with Konica Minolta for the purchase of four multifunction copy machines. Two
copy machines for the Fire Department, one for the Senior Center and one for Municipal
Services.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The City of Lake Forest currently has 10 multipurpose copy
machines. These machines are either leased or owned. In addition, these machines are
maintained by three different companies.
As staff completed a thorough analysis of all equipment throughout the City, it was
determined there could be economies of scale in consolidating all of the City’s machines
into a single contract. The City could save money when leasing or buying new machines
in bulk and potentially lock in a unified monthly service rate. With respect to IT, by
standardizing the type of copy machines on the print server, this streamlines
troubleshooting maintenance and the deployment of printer resources. In streamlining
the City’s multipurpose copy machines it could significantly improve internal
accountability and management of the City’s copy machines.
In summer 2012 a Request for Proposal (RFP) was released based on a thorough
comparison of all leases, purchase contracts and maintenance agreements.
Specifications in the RFP were based on departmental needs to maintain optimum
efficiency. A total of nine vendors responded to the RFP.
In response, a committee of City staff was formed with representatives from the Office of
the City Manager, Finance, IT, Senior Center, Public Works and Fire to evaluate the bids.
Several of the vendors were disqualified as they did not meet the specs requested in the
RFP; however, after careful review Konica Minolta (Bizhub), Illinois Paper (Ricoh), Simply
Proven (Toshiba) and Chicago Office Technology (Xerox) were selected by the
committee for demonstrations.
Each machine was utilized for a one week period at Municipal Services and the Fire
Station. Each machine was connected to the City network to enable City staff to use all
available functions in the evaluation of each machine.
After a thorough vetting of the four different copiers tested, the Konica Minolta machine
met all expectations and criteria required by all departments. Staff is recommending the
purchase of the four copy machines through Konica Minolta. Although Konica Minolta is
not the lowest bidder these machines were intuitive, had excellent printing quality,
scanning capabilities, searchable PDF capability and they were the quietest.
Additionally, Konica Minolta has demonstrated a history of excellent service. Currently
7
April 15, 2013 Agenda
the Recreation, City Hall and the CROYA Department have Konica Minolta machines
and are quite satisfied with quality and service. The copier being replaced at Dickinson
Hall is also a Konica Minolta and they have experienced the same reliable quality and
service.
BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT: Bids for the four copiers were received and opened on October
25, 2012. Staff compared the purchase of the machines versus leasing the individual
machines over a period of 5 years.
The following is a summary of the bids received:
Bidder Purchase Price
Annual
Maintenance
Purchase
plus Annual
Maintenance
60 Month
Lease
Illinois Paper *38,741$ 9,156$ 47,897$ 42,540$
Konica Minlota *40,073 11,019 51,092 54,917
Chicago Office Technology *45,250 6,079 51,329 83,144
Ricoh 37,992 18,283 56,275 40,802
Impact Networking 36,904 20,229 57,133 52,390
Simply Proven *43,000 16,350 59,350 47,733
Image Systems 43,800 18,960 62,760 54,120
North Shore Bus.Did not meet specs
Cannon Did not meet specs
* Machines were included in the demo
** Annual maintenance calculated based on maximum copies generated per year
Below is an estimated summary of Project budget:
FY2013 Funding Source Amount
Budgeted Amount Requested Budgeted
Y/N
Capital Fund $15,000 $11,088 Y
Senior Resources
$0 $9,437
N
General – Fire (2) $0 $19,548
N
RECOMMENDED ACTION: If appropriate and should the City Council desire, Staff
recommends that the City Council approve awarding the contract for the purchase of
four copy machines to Konica Minolta in the amount of $40,073, with the additional
annual maintenance of $11,019. The funding for the Senior Resources will come from
reserves and the two fire copiers will come from savings in the FY13 General fund.
Although the purchase of the Senior and Fire machines was not contemplated in the FY13
budget, purchase of the machines is recommended because it is more cost effective
8
April 15, 2013 Agenda
than leasing over time. Maintenance costs are budgeted within the department
operating budgets.
6. Award of Bid for a Greens Mower for the Golf Course Maintenance Section
Included in the FY2014 Capital Equipment Budget
Staff Contact: Michael Thomas, Director of Public Works (810-3540)
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Staff is requesting City Council authorization to
replace a green mower for Deerpath Golf Course’s maintenance operation. The greens
mower is a riding reel mower that is designed to minimize compaction to the green’s turf.
The replacement unit is equipped with a greens tender that stands the grass up prior to
cutting and a system of rollers that smooth out uneven surfaces. The unit is scheduled to
be replaced in fiscal year 2014. Staff followed the required bidding procedures as
outlined in the City’s purchasing directive. If the low bid is awarded by City Council, staff
anticipates receiving this mower by mid-May.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Over the past ten years, Deerpath Golf Course’s
maintenance staff has standardized their equipment with the John Deere product line.
Very similar to how the City’s fleet is primarily General Motors products, Deerpath’s
maintenance staff has also realized the same benefits with “like” equipment. Many parts
on the John Deere line of mowers are interchangeable to include filters, hydraulic lines,
wheels, tanks, etc. This provides for ease of use amongst the maintenance staff and
more efficient preventative maintenance throughout the golf season. The existing unit, a
1992 Jacobsen Greens King IV, will be traded-in upon receipt of the new mower.
BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT: The hollow tube frame on the existing Jacobsen mower has
separated three times in recent years and continuously needs to be reinforced. Three
reels are in need of replacement and the engine has been burning oil over the past two
years. With these existing issues in mind, the following bids were received on March 28,
2013:
Greens Mower: Budget Amount $45,000
Vendor Make / Model Bid Amount Trade Amount Net Amount
J.W. Turf John Deere 2500B 35,170 500 34,670
Erb Turf Eqpt. John Deere 2500B 36,545 475 36,070
*Frontier Ag. & Turf John Deere 2500B 36,970 450 36,520
Reynolds Golf & Turf John Deere 2500B 37,164 500 36,664
*Late Bid
The Golf Course maintenance staff have worked with J.W. Turf for many years and notes
that their technical and warranty support have been excellent along with their next day
delivery for all parts.
FY2014
Funding
Source
Account Number
Account
Budget
Amount
Requested
Budgeted?
Y/N
Golf Fund 510-6301-454-7502 $45,000 $34,670 Y
9
April 15, 2013 Agenda
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Award of bid for a greens mower to the lowest responsible
bidder, J.W. Turf in the total net amount of $34,670; this is $10,330 under the budgeted
amount of $45,000.
7. Award of contract for Onwentsia Road Skokie River Watermain Replacement
Project.
Staff Contact: Robert Ells, Engineering Supervisor (810-3555)
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Staff requests City Council award the contract for the
Onwentsia Road Skokie River Watermain Replacement Project to RJ Underground, Inc.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The project involves replacing the existing aged watermain
located under the Skokie River along the North side of Onwentsia Road. The Onwentsia
Road watermain project limits are 100’ east and west of the Skokie River. The existing
undersized 6” cast iron watermain under the Skokie River has a history of main breaks and
will be replaced with 8" HDPE watermain. Most of the Onwentsia Road watermain
installation will be installed utilizing a trenchless direction bore technology under the
Skokie River.
The preparation of plans and specifications including performing field surveys and design
were prepared by in-house Engineering staff thereby allocating the design saving costs
to other CIP projects. The Engineering staff will also provide daily inspectional services.
BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT: Bids for the Onwentsia Road Skokie River Watermain
Replacement Project were received and opened on March 29, 2013. City received a
total of three (3) bids. It is staff’s opinion that the bids received were competitive when
compared to bids received in past years.
The following is a summary of the bids received:
BIDDER BID AMOUNT
RJ Underground Inc. $ 45,237.00
Berger Excavating $ 54,752.50
RA Mancini, Inc. $ 120,000.00
Engineer’s Estimate $ 50,000.00
The low bidder, RJ Underground, Inc., installed the new watermains along Tanglewood
Court and Basswood Road in 2012. The projects were completed on time and the work
was deemed satisfactory to City staff.
Below is a summary of Project budget:
FY2013 Funding Source Account
Budget
Amount
Requested
(incl. 5% contin.)
Budgeted?
Y/N
10
April 15, 2013 Agenda
Water and Sewer Fund $ 50,000 $ 47,498.85 Y
If awarded, the project would commence on or about April 22 and be completed within
30 days of the start of construction. The homeowners residing within the limits of the
project and other homeowners in the vicinity will be notified two weeks prior to start of
construction. The City website, under “Construction Updates”, will also provide details on
the construction schedule.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends awarding the contract for the Onwentsia
Road Skokie River Watermain Replacement Project to RJ Underground, Inc. in the amount
of $47,498.85. This amount includes authorization to expend, if necessary, an additional
amount not to exceed 5% of the contract award for unforeseen change orders that may
occur during the administration of this project.
8. Award of contract for Wilson and West Fork Drive Watermain Replacement Project
Staff Contact: Robert Ells, Engineering Supervisor (810-3555)
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Staff requests awarding the contract for the Wilson
and West Fork Drive Watermain Replacement Project to RA Mancini, Inc.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The project involves replacing existing aged watermains
located under Wilson Drive and West Fork Drive. The Wilson Drive watermain project limits
are from West Fork Drive to Farm Road. The West Fork Drive watermain project limits are
from Wilson Drive to Littlefield Court. The existing undersized 6” cast iron watermain along
Wilson Drive will be replaced with the City standard 8" PVC watermain. The existing 8”
cast iron watermain along West Fork Drive will be replaced with the City standard 8” PVC
watermain.
Each year, as part of the Capital Improvement Program budget, staff evaluates the
condition of existing watermain infrastructure in terms of age, capacity, watermain
breaks, and other capital improvement projects scheduled on that street. Based on these
factors staff developed an annual Watermain Replacement Program schedule to
maintain City’s water distribution system at an optimum functional level. The watermain
replacement program was presented at the November 19, 2012 joint Finance and Public
Works Committee meeting.
A majority of the Wilson and West Fork Drive watermain will be installed utilizing a
trenchless, directional drilling technique, thereby creating less excavation and
disturbance in the construction area.
The preparation of plans and specifications including performing field surveys and design
were prepared by in-house Engineering staff thereby allocating the design saving costs
to other CIP projects. The Engineering staff will also provide daily inspectional services.
BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT: Bids for the Wilson and West Fork Drive Watermain Replacement
Project were received and opened on March 15, 2013. City received a total of six (6)
bids.
11
April 15, 2013 Agenda
The following is a summary of the bids received:
BIDDER BID AMOUNT
RA Mancini, Inc. $ 894,462.50
Berger Excavating $ 915,068.50
Anchor Construction $ 947,200.00
RJ Underground Inc. $ 999,916.00
Alamp Concrete Contractor $ 1,031,485.00
Bolder Contractors, Inc. $ 1,072,138.50
Engineer’s Estimate $ 1,179,980.00
The low bidder, RA Mancini, Inc. has previously worked in The City of Lake Forest. Most
recently they completed the installation of new watermains along Park Avenue and
Greenleaf in 2011. The project was completed on time and the work was satisfactory to
City staff.
Below is a summary of Project budget:
FY2014 Funding Source Account
Budget
Amount
Requested
(incl. 5% contin.)
Budgeted?
Y/N
Water and Sewer Fund $ 1,200,000.00 $ 939,185.62 Y
If awarded, the project would commence in mid-May and be completed within 90 days
after the start of construction. The homeowners residing within the limits of the project
were notified in writing in early spring about this potential project. Upon confirming the
start date of the project, another letter will be sent to the above mentioned residents two
weeks prior to start of construction. The City website, under Construction Updates, will
also provide details on the construction schedule.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends awarding the contract for the Wilson and
West Fork Drive Watermain Replacement Project to RA Mancini, Inc. in the amount of
$939,185.62 to include authorization to expend, if necessary, an additional amount not to
exceed 5% of the contract award for unforeseen change orders that may occur during
the administration of this project.
9. SUBJECT: Award of a Contract for a Pavement Management Program
Staff Contact: Robert Ells, Engineering Supervisor (810-3555)
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Award of a contract to Infrastructure Management
Services (IMS) to perform a structural analysis on the City’s entire network of streets and
selected parking lots.
12
April 15, 2013 Agenda
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: In 1991, The City of Lake Forest began a comprehensive
Pavement Management Program which was a much needed resource used to make
sound decisions in choosing streets to be rehabilitated under the Annual Pavement
Resurfacing Program. The Pavement Management Program involved performing a
structural analysis on the City’s entire street system and then using this information to
predict the rate of deterioration of each specific pavement section contained within all
of streets in the City. This information is useful in that it determines the most optimal time,
both financially and operationally, to rehabilitate a specific street. Additionally, the
program evaluates multiple rehabilitation alternatives.
Since this initial testing, the City has undertaken subsequent testing approximately every 5
years (1994, 1999, 2004 and 2010). This 5-year cycle of testing was adopted to
synchronize with our 5-year Pavement Resurfacing Program, a component of the 5-year
Capital Improvement Program.
Over time, recommendations generated by the Pavement Management Program
became suspect due to the age of the data collected. Staff is realizing drastic changes
in pavement conditions not reflected in the pavement ratings, especially on the streets in
the late stages of their expected lifecycle. Staff is proposing that the City now procure
the services of IMS on a 3-year cycle to update our Pavement Management Program
and establish an updated list of streets to be included in the current 5-year Pavement
Resurfacing Program.
BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT: Staff proposes to utilize the $60,000 currently slated for
preliminary design for improvements to the drainage and traffic flow at Deer path and Rt.
41(FY 2014 General Fund). These requirements will now be incorporated into the IDOT
Pump House Replacement Project without cost to the City.
The IMS contract proposal is attached on page 75.
Below is a summary of project budget:
FY2014 Funding
Source
Amount
Budgeted
Amount
Requested
Budgeted?
Y/N
General $60,000 $59,629 Y
If awarded, the project would commence in May, 2013 and be completed by the end of
August, 2013. This will allow staff to incorporate the updated pavement analysis ratings
into the FY 2015 Capital improvement Program.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Award of contract to IMS to perform a structural analysis on the
City’s entire network of streets and selected parking lots for a not-to-exceed amount of
$59,629.
10. Award of Lake Forest share of the joint 2013 Annual Street Resurfacing (ASR)
Program contract.
Staff Contact: Robert Ells, Engineering Supervisor (810-3555)
13
April 15, 2013 Agenda
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Staff requests awarding Lake Forest share of the joint
2013 Annual Street Resurfacing Program contract to Peter Baker & Son.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: In 2010, City conducted the pavement structural analysis
test, on the entire City street inventory of approximately 130 miles. The test culminated in
developing a 5-yr annual pavement rehabilitation program identifying the streets to be
resurfaced each year.
City Staff have previously briefed the Council on Municipal Partnership Initiative (MPI), a
program that takes advantage of economies of scale, for securing low bid prices,
among neighboring municipalities who bid similar projects each year. This year, City
joined forces with Lake Bluff to do a joint bid for the ASR program.
In 2013, City plans to resurface approximately 6 center-lane miles of streets. A copy of the
map is attached on page 83. The streets to be resurfaced are:
Street From To
Ashley Road Ringwood Road Keith Lane
Bank Lane Wisconsin Avenue Market Square
Bank Lane Illinois Road Vine Avenue
Estate Lane Everett Road Old Mill Road
Forest Ave Westminster Deerpath
Gage Lane Waukegan Road Route 41
Golf Lane Deerpath North End
Havenwood Lane Sheridan Road East End
Hawkweed Lane W. Laurel Avenue North End
Illinois Road Washington Road Stone Gate Road
Keith Lane Ashley Road Havenwood Lane
Littlefield Court Old Mill Road North End
Maple Court Maplewood Road South End
Maplewood Sheridan Road Mayflower Road
Oakwood Avenue Woodland St. Mary’s Parking Lot
Overlook Drive Ringwood Road East End
Red Fox Lane Westleigh Road South End
Ringwood Rd N Sheridan Road Mayflower Road
Rosemary Road Washington Road Mayflower Road
Summit Place Summit Avenue Oakwood Avenue
Thorne Lane Rosemary Road North End
Vine Avenue Green Bay Road Western Avenue
BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT: The project was bid in early March with the bids opened on
March 15, 2013. A total of three (3) firms bid the joint project. The bid price consists of bid
14
April 15, 2013 Agenda
quantities that are to be completed by both municipalities as part of their respective
resurfacing program.
The following is a summary of the bids received:
BIDDER BID PRICE
Peter Baker & Son $1,831,543.94
Curran Contracting $1,924,414.56
Johnson Paving $2,133,777.36
Alamp $2,135,047.00
The breakdown of the bid specific to Lake Forest bid items are summarized below:
BIDDER LAKE FOREST SHARE
Peter Baker & Son $1,427,331.34
Curran Contracting $1,493,397.81
Johnson Paving $1,673,215.66
Alamp $1,674,801.40
Engineer’s Estimate $1,499,706.88
The low bidder for the combined bid, Peter Baker & Son, has considerable experience
working in Lake Forest and has been performing projects in a satisfactory manner.
As part of annual pavement inspection for potholes and in response to resident inquiries,
City staff evaluates the condition of the streets to add a street or two to the Annual Street
Resurfacing program provided the estimate is within the budgeted amount. One such
street is Oakwood Avenue between Summit Place and Woodland Road and between
Deerpath and St. Mary’s parking lot. Both sections of Oakwood have surface
deterioration thereby causing inconvenience to motorists.
The Engineer’s estimate to repave these sections of Oakwood is approximately
$97,445.00. Based on Peter Baker & Son bid for the Lake Forest share of the 2013 ASR
program, adding Oakwood Avenue to the original contract would be still under the
budgeted amount of $1,550,000. In order to maximize savings for the City and take
advantage of competitive bidding prices, staff recommends adding Oakwood to the
Lake Forest share of the 2013 Annual Street Resurfacing program.
The breakdown of Peter Baker & Son bid between the various funds is summarized below:
FUND BAKER BID PRICE
(INCL. 4% CONTIN.) ENGINEER’S ESTIMATE
Capital Fund $1,550,000.00 $1,499,706.88
15
April 15, 2013 Agenda
Both municipalities are scheduled to award their respective contracts in the month of
April and the Lake Forest share of the combined bid from Peter Baker & Son in the
amount of $1,427,331.34 is lower than the Engineer’s Estimate.
City Engineering staff will provide daily inspectional services for Lake Forest portion of the
contract.
If awarded, work on this project is expected to begin in mid-May and be substantially
completed by mid-August. Upon award of the contract, both municipalities will meet
with the contractor to get a tentative schedule for each community. The property
owners near the vicinity of the construction work for Lake Forest portion of the 2013 ASR
program will be notified in advance of the start of construction. The City website, under
Construction Updates, will also provide the details the construction schedule.
Below is an estimated summary of Project budget:
FY2013 Funding Source Amount
Budgeted
Amount
Requested
Budgeted?
Y/N
Capital Fund $1,550,000.00 $1,550,000.00 Y
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends awarding the Lake Forest share of the joint
2013 Annual Street Resurfacing Program contract to Peter Baker & Son in the amount of
$1,550,000.00 to include authorization to expend, if necessary, four percent contingency
for unforeseen change orders that may occur during the administration of this project.
11. Award of Bid for the Recreation Classrooms at Everett Park HVAC Replacement
Project Included in the F.Y. 2013 CIP Budget
Staff Contact: Dan Martin, Superintendent of Public Works (810-3561)
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Staff is requesting City Council authorization to award
a bid for the 2013 Recreation Classrooms at Everett Park HVAC Replacement Project to
Core Mechanical, Inc. The project includes replacing two existing 17 year old unit
ventilators with two new split systems including two ERV’s (Energy Recovery Ventilation
systems). The project would be scheduled for completion by the end of June 2013.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: In 1996 as part of the Everett Park Improvement Plan (T.I.F.
Funding) The City renovated the field house restrooms and built two classrooms for the
Recreation Department. Other park improvements included constructing the garage
and two picnic shelters. The Recreation Center utilizes the classrooms for early childhood
education programming. As part of the Recreation renovations the City is responsible for
the infrastructure and maintenance in that portion of the building.
The existing classroom HVAC system consists of two separate unit ventilators, one for
each classroom. These large bulky cabinet units (measuring 4’ x 9’) reside within the
classrooms which causes a multitude of issues to include:
16
April 15, 2013 Agenda
• The noise from each unit disrupts classes to the point where teachers shut them
down.
• The units are used as tables causing many of the vents to be covered up, thereby
reducing their effectiveness.
• Maintenance and repairs to the units causes disruption to the classes.
The City acquired the services of Lakefront Engineering to determine the best way to
address the current issues. The proposed course was to remove the unit ventilators from
the classrooms and replace them with two split systems. The new units would consist of
two air handlers installed above the drop ceiling and two A/C condensers located on
the roof. This would address the current issues by relocating the noisiest part of the system
to the roof, the air vents would now be in the ceiling, and maintenance of the system
would take place outside of the classroom.
During this process it was found that the air exchange rate for the classrooms does not
meet the current code requirements. It was determined that the best course of action is
to add an ERV (Energy Recovery Ventilation) system to each split system. The upfront cost
for the equipment and additional duct work would be higher, but the benefits would be
two-fold. First, the ERV’s pre-condition the air, improving the operational efficiencies of
the larger equipment. This provides greater long term savings through reduced energy
consumption. Secondly, the new units will supply the proper fresh air exchange providing
a cleaner, healthier atmosphere.
BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT:
On March 22, 2013, staff received the following bids for this project:
Company Bid Amount
Core Mechanical, Inc. $64,800
Martin Petersen Company $84,900
McDonough Mechanical Services $84,927
Westside Mechanical Services $89,300
Premier Mechanical, Inc. $92,000
Air Con Refrigeration & Heat $94,900
Amber Mechanical $114,400
After a detailed review of the bids, Core Mechanical’s proposal met all of the required
project specifications and their references gave favorable responses. The additional
funding needed for the overage will be covered by savings from other completed
projects over this past fiscal year.
FY2013
Funding
Source
Account Budget Amount
Requested
Budgeted?
Y/N
CIP $50,000 $68,040 Y
17
April 15, 2013 Agenda
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Award of bid to Core Mechanical, Inc. in the amount of
$64,800. Additionally, staff is requesting a 5% or $3,240 contingency for any unforeseen
problems during the project.
12. Award of Contract for Thermoplastic Lane Marking
Staff Contact: Dan Martin, Superintendent of Public Works (810-3561)
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Staff requests approval to award the contract for
Thermoplastic Lane Marking to Superior Road Striping.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The City of Lake Forest, as a member of the Northwest
Municipal Conference, also belongs to the Suburban Purchasing Cooperative (SPC). The
SPC is made up of 134 communities in the six county region of Northern Illinois to include
the Northwest Municipal Conference, the South Suburban Mayors and Managers
Association, the DuPage Mayors Conference and the Will County Government League.
One of SPC’s annual joint purchasing initiatives is to have thermoplastic lane markings bid
for member agencies. SPC’s lane marking specifications meet Illinois Department of
Transportation (IDOT) standards. Bids and selection of the lowest responsible and
responsive bidder are approved by IDOT.
The 2012 SPC/IDOT lane marking contract was awarded to Superior Road Striping, Inc. of
Melrose Park, Illinois. In February 2013, the Suburban Purchasing Cooperative’s Governing
Board approved the first of three possible one-year extensions to Superior Road Striping,
Inc. with a 4% price increase. The table below shows the cost difference between the
contract City Council awarded in 2012 and the proposed 2013 contract. With the
contract extension, Superior Road Striping, Inc. agrees to all terms and conditions set forth
in the original contract and must comply with all IDOT rules and regulations. The
company will also adhere to all prevailing wage and certified payroll regulations.
BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT: The City of Lake Forest’s lane marking needs are on a rotating
four zone cycle. The first of four zones was completed in 2012. This year’s request is for
another 164,930 feet of thermoplastic pavement marking, to include 4”, 6”, 12” and 24”
wide lines as well as various letters and symbols. The total cost for the Lake Forest’s 2013
striping and marking will be $99,135. This is less than the $100,000 included in the FY2014
Capital Improvement Budget for this work.
Below is a summary of the project budget.
FY2014 Funding Source Amount
Budgeted
Amount
Requested
Budgeted?
Y/N
311-0050-431-67-22 $100,000 $99,135 Y
RECOMMENDED ACTION: The recommended action is to award a contract for
thermoplastic lane marking to Superior Road Striping, Inc. in the amount of $99,135.
Contractor 2012 Awarded Contract 2013 Proposed Contract
Superior Road Striping $98,704 $99,135
18
April 15, 2013 Agenda
13. Consideration of a Request for an Extension of Tentative Plat Approval for the Spiel
Subdivision. (Approve a motion granting the request.)
STAFF CONTACT CATHERINE CZERNIAK,
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (810-3504)
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: The Spiels are requesting a 12-month extension of the
previously granted tentative plat approval for the subdivision of their property, the Spiel
Subdivision.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: On May 21, 2012, based on a recommendation from the
Plan Commission, the City Council granted tentative plat approval of the Spiel
Subdivision. Tentative plat approval is valid for 12 months. Section 38-17 of the City Code
authorizes the City Council to grant up to two 12-month extensions of tentative plat
approval based on a determination that the property owner has demonstrated “good
cause”.
As required by the Code, the Spiels submitted a written request for a 12-month extension.
The request for extension is based on two factors: the process for obtaining the required
permits for work within the wetland is still in progress and the Spiels hope to bring the
subdivision forward as the economy continues to strengthen. The Spiels further detail
these reasons in their letter which is included in the Council packet along with the
previously approved tentative plat of subdivision and a vicinity map all beginning on
page 84.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve a motion granting a 12-month extension of the
tentative plat for the Spiel Subdivision.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the Thirteen Omnibus items as presented.
ORDINANCES 8:40 p.m.
1. Consideration of an Ordinance Amending The City of Lake Forest Liquor Code
(Second Reading, Final Approval)
PRESENTED BY: VICTOR FILIPPINI, CITY ATTORNEY
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Staff is requesting City Council review and final
approval of an Ordinance amending the City’s Liquor Code.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Mayor is the designated Liquor Commissioner. In such
the Commissioner and the City Council have the authority to establish licensing and other
regulations related to the sale of alcoholic beverages.
At your March 18 Council meeting, Attorney Victor Filippini outlined modifications to the
liquor code to ensure its accuracy and in compliance with state law and current local
19
April 15, 2013 Agenda
practices. Since that meeting, staff has made further modifications in accordance with
the City Councils recommendations.
This evening, Victor Filippini will walk the Council through all of the suggested
modifications. The code amendment attached on page 87 of your council packet
includes the four new licenses for Kemper Sports, Westwood Bistro, Presbyterian Homes
and the BMW Special Event. The proposed ordinance does not include any classification
or license for gas stations within the community.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: If appropriate and should the City Council desire, approve final
reading of the liquor code as presented.
NEW BUSINESS 9:00 p.m.
1. Consideration of a Resolution Directing the Plan Commission to Consider
Amending the Code to Establish a Review Process for the Extension of Private Roads
Outside the City Limits (Approval of Resolution)
STAFF CONTACT: CATHERINE CZERNIAK,
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (810-3504)
PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Consideration of a Resolution directing the Plan
Commission to consider a Code amendment establishing a review process for extensions
of private roads outside of the City limits.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Currently, the City of Lake Forest Code does not provide a
process for review or approval of extensions of private roads outside the City limits. A
Resolution directing the Plan Commission to consider whether such a process should be
established; and if so, what that process should be, is included in the Council packet
beginning on page 121. An established review process would allow an evaluation, in a
public forum, of proposed extensions of private roads outside the City limits to assess
impacts on the City. Impacts could include, but may not be limited to, increased
demand for City services or impacts on adjacent neighborhoods within the City of Lake
Forest.
If the Council chooses to approve the Resolution, City staff will work with the City Attorney
to prepare a draft amendment establishing a process for review of proposed extensions
of private roads outside of the City limits. The draft amendment will be presented to the
Plan Commission for public hearing and deliberation. At the conclusion of its work, the
Plan Commission will make a recommendation to the City Council and if a Code
amendment is recommended, the amendment language will be forwarded to the City
Council for consideration and final action.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve a Resolution directing the Plan Commission to hold
a public hearing to consider amendments to the Code to establish a process for review
and approval of the extension of private roads outside the City limits.
ADDITIONAL ITEMS FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION
20
April 15, 2013 Agenda
ADJOURNMENT INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS MATTERS OF LAND DISPOSITION AND
LAND ACQUISITION. 9:05 p.m.
Office of the City Manager April 12, 2013
The City of Lake Forest is subject to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities
Act of 1990. Individuals with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who require
certain accommodations in order to allow them to observe and/or participate in this
meeting, or who have questions regarding the accessibility of the meeting or the
facilities, are required to contact City Manager Robert R. Kiely, Jr., at (847) 234-2600
promptly to allow the City to make reasonable accommodations for those persons.
21
22
23
24
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, Arbor Day will be officially observed in the State of Illinois on Friday,
April 26, 2013, by proclamation of the Governor and the planting of trees
on Arbor Day is a traditional activity throughout the State and The City of
Lake Forest, and
WHEREAS, Lake Forest, with its environment of natural areas, is particularly
dedicated to the observance of this day and has consistency throughout its
history enacted ordinances to preserve its trees and other natural assets,
and
WHEREAS, citizen groups, garden clubs, and private and public institutions have
actively supported preservation efforts and the renewal of natural areas
through tree planting and landscape projects, and
WHEREAS, the celebration of Arbor Day 2013 in Lake Forest will include the
distribution of 2,000 Swamp White Oak seedlings to students in public
and private elementary schools, and Arbor Day 2013 will be celebrated
throughout the day in programs at schools and other locations; and at
Mellody Farms (located at 350 North Waukegan Road, Lake Forest), on
Friday, April 26th at 10:00 a.m., where the City’s official Arbor Day trees,
one Swamp White Oak tree, will be planted, and
WHEREAS, trees in our City, wherever they are planted, increase property values,
enhance our business and residential areas, beautify our community, and
are a source of joy to gladden the hearts and promote the environmental
well-being of present and future generations, and
WHEREAS, The City of Lake Forest has been recognized as Tree City USA for thirty-
two consecutive years by the National Arbor Day Foundation,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Donald P. Schoenheider, Mayor of The City of Lake Forest, do
hereby proclaim Friday, April 26, 2013, as ARBOR DAY in The City of Lake Forest,
and I urge all citizens to support efforts to protect our trees and woodlands, to support our
City’s forestry program, to plant trees on this day, and to join in the celebration
ceremonies.
IN WITNESS HEREOF, I have hereunder set my hand and have had the Seal of The City
of Lake Forest affixed this 26th day of April, 2013.
____________________
Donald P. Schoenheider
Mayor
25
26
Water Fee SurveyRates as of May, 2013ResidentialResidentialWater RatesSanitary Sewer (billed through municipality)CommunityRates Per 1000 gallon Rates per 1000 gallon TotalFuture YearsBannockburn**$7.79$5.80$13.59No projected annual increase at this timeLincolnshire** $4.43$5.27$9.70Approximately 3% per yearDeerfield **$5.20$3.93$9.13No projected annual increase at this timeNorthfield$6.26$2.45$8.71No projected annual increase at this timeEvanston$3.22$5.27$8.49Increases on water & sewer but are not set Wilmette$3.33$4.60$7.93No projected annual increase at this timeLake Bluff (M)$6.60$1.10$7.707% spread over the next 6 yearsNorth Chicago (M)$4.55$1.90$6.45Water = 6% for 3 years, Sewer =20% for FY14Lake Forest - Proposed (M)$5.14$1.16$6.30Lake Forest - Current (M)$4.99$1.16$6.15Glenview (M)$4.90$1.29$6.197.5% to 9% over next 5 yrs, water rates onlyGlencoeGlencoeGlencoeGlencoe$4.55$4.55$4.55$4.55$1.28$1.28$1.28$1.28$5.83$5.83$5.83$5.83 No Response - May 2012 rates providedNo Response - May 2012 rates providedNo Response - May 2012 rates providedNo Response - May 2012 rates providedGurnee (M)$4.10$1.30$5.402014=$4.21, 2015=$4.33.Winnetka$3.98$1.39$5.37Increases on water & sewer but are not set Northbrook$4.08$0.80$4.8818% increase 5/1/2014Skokie$4.48 included $4.48Increases based costs to break evenHighland Park$2.42$1.07$3.49No projected annual increase at this time** Water supplied by Highland Park(M)= Indicates community assesses flat meter fees per billing cycle in addition to the consumption rates.Meter SizeWater Sewer Small = 5/8th - 1 inch$10.00$5.00Medium = 2 - 4 inch$100.00$20.00Large = 6 inch and above$500.00$100.00The City of Lake ForestLake Forest customer charge/qtr.2/12/20132:06 PMG:\Finance\Water Tax Survey\Water Rate Survey\Water Rate Survey FY2014.xls27
THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST
ORDINANCE NO. _________
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A
FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST
WHEREAS, The City has established various fees and charges as part of its
codes, ordinances, rules, regulations, and policies, which fees and charges are
reviewed from time-to-time; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed such fees and charges, and
hereby determines that it is necessary to adjust certain existing fees and charges,
and/or to establish formally other fees and charges; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interests
of the City and its residents to adopt this Ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, COUNTY OF LAKE, STATE
OF ILLINOIS, as follows:
SECTION ONE: Recitals. The foregoing recitals are incorporated as the
findings of the City Council and are hereby incorporated into and made a part of
this Ordinance.
SECTION TWO: Approval of Fee Schedule. The City Council hereby
approves the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit A (“Fee Schedule”). To the extent
any provision of any code, ordinance, regulation, rule, or policy of the City is
28
2
contrary to the Fee Schedule, such provision is hereby deemed amended so that the
Fee Schedule shall control. Any fee or charge not otherwise listed on the Fee
Schedule shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
SECTION THREE: Effective Date of Fee Schedule. The fees and
charges set forth on the Fee Schedule shall take effect as of the date noted on the
Fee Schedule.
SECTION FOUR: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force
and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication in pamphlet form in the
manner provided by law.
Passed this ____ day of _________________________, 2013 AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Approved this __ day of _________________________, 2013 _____________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk
29
3
Exhibit A
Schedule of Fees and Charges
30
The City of Lake Forest
Effective May 1, 2013 or As Noted PROPOSED
Fees and Charges FY2014
Amount $$
%Projected
Fund FY2014 FEE CHANGE Revenue
1. Public Works
Water Utility Fees/Charges
Turn Off Water Fee Water 75 n/c
Turn Off Water Fee After Hours Water 100 n/c
Turn On Water Fee Water 75 n/c
Turn On Water Fee After Hours Water 100 n/c
Water Main Taps:Water
1 Inch Water 500 n/c
1-1/2 Inch Water 1,000 n/c
2 Inch Water 1,300 n/c
3,4,6 and 8 inch taps Water 900 n/c
Water Meter Fees:Water
3/4 Inch Water 470 n/c
1 Inch Water 540 n/c
1-1/2 Inch Water 910 n/c
2 Inch Water 1,165 n/c
3 inch Water 2,615 n/c
4 inch Water 3,950 n/c
6 inch Water 6,840 n/c
Plant Investment Fee - SF Water 2,900 n/c
Multi-Family Dwelling - new structure Water 2,652 n/c
Residential pools, sprinkler systems Water 459 n/c
Nonresidential buildings - new structures and additions Water 1.02/sq ft of entire n/c
Water interior area of the building n/c
Institutional buildings - new structure and additions Water .94/sq ft of entire n/c
only if eligible for fed and state tax exempt status Water interior area of the building n/c
General Fees
Sticker for Leaf/Grass Bags General 1.00 per sticker n/c
Sanitation
Special Pickup General $ 40 per cubic yard n/c
White Goods General 65 n/c
White Goods W/CFC General 90 n/c
Licenses
Exhibit A
4/15/13 City Council 1 of 18
31
The City of Lake Forest
Effective May 1, 2013 or As Noted PROPOSED
Fees and Charges FY2014
Amount $$
%Projected
Fund FY2014 FEE CHANGE Revenue
Scavengers - collects and disposes of multi-family and 1,500 per company n/c
commercial waste
Scavengers - collects and disposes of residential and 750 per company n/c
commercial roll -offs
Scavengers - collection and cleaning of portable toilets 200 per company n/c
2. Community Development
Water Utility Fees/Charges
Water Service Inspection Fee Water 50 n/c
Home Inspection Fee Water 150 n/c
Home Inspection Fee - Re-Inspection Water 50 n/c
General Fees
Zoning Analysis General 100 n/c
Building & Development Fees:
Service Contracts:
Lake Bluff General Per Agreement n/c
Bannockburn General $5,000 min.n/c
& 50% over that
Plan Review :
Remodeling up to $12,000 General 55 n/c
$12,001 to $48,000 Remodeling General 55 n/c
$48,001 - $120,000 Remodeling General 55 n/c
over $120,000 Remodeling General 55 n/c
Additional fee for plan reviews that require more than 2 hours General $55 per additional hour n/c
New Construction - SFD General 400 n/c
New Construction - 2FD General 230/unit n/c
New Const. - Com. & Multi. Fam.$572+$50/n/c
3 or more units 1,000 Sq. Ft.n/c
Plan Re-Submittal Fee General $ 140 per re-submittal n/c
Alterations to Approved Plans General $ 140 + $55 per hour fee n/c
for reviews n/c
requiring more than 2 hours n/c
Building Scale Calculation Fees
4/15/13 City Council 2 of 18
32
The City of Lake Forest
Effective May 1, 2013 or As Noted PROPOSED
Fees and Charges FY2014
Amount $$
%Projected
Fund FY2014 FEE CHANGE Revenue
Single Family residence - first review General 400 n/c
with completed Building Scale worksheet/detailed plans General 200 n/c
Two-family dwelling General $ 189 per unit n/c
with completed Building Scale worksheet/detailed plans General 120 n/c
Additonal reviews (for revised plans)General 102 n/c
On-site inspection for an existing dwelling General 102 n/c
Office meeting to discuss for building scale calculation General 50 n/c
Building Scale Waiver Request General 100 n/c
Building Review Board Fees
Signs/Awnings/Landscaping/
Lighting/Fences General 75 n/c
Two or more of above General 125 n/c
Storefront Alterations General 100 n/c
New Commercial building, school, hospital or multi-family building General 700 n/c
per building
Alterations or major additions to commerical buildings, schools, General 323 n/c
hopitals or multi-family buildings - per building
New multi-building projects - per building General 850 + 175 for more than n/c
4 buildings (per building)n/c
Satellite Dish General 100 n/c
Changes to approved building materials General 60 n/c
Demolition with replacement structure General 2,230 n/c
Demolition partial and replacement addition General 1,310 n/c
Demolition w/o Replacement Struture General 1,310 n/c
Replacement/new single family home/duplex structure General 1,310 n/c
Variance from Building Scale Ordinance General 367 n/c
Revisions to Approved Plans General 225 n/c
Historic Preservation Commission Fees
Demolition (complete) and replacement structure General 2,450 n/c
Demolition (partial) and replacement structure General 1,529 n/c
Removal of less than 50%
New Residence on Vacant Property (building scale fee also)General 1,050 n/c
Additions & Alterations to Existing Residence (building scale fee also)General 500 n/c
Revisions to Approved Plans General 225 n/c
Variance from Building Scale Ordinance General 367 n/c
Rescission of local landmark designation, amendment of
local landmark designation or historic map amendment General 2,500 n/c
4/15/13 City Council 3 of 18
33
The City of Lake Forest
Effective May 1, 2013 or As Noted PROPOSED
Fees and Charges FY2014
Amount $$
%Projected
Fund FY2014 FEE CHANGE Revenue
Project Fees
Red Tag , per violation, per day General 300 n/c
Stop Work Order General 750 n/c
Storage Tank - Removal
SF and Duplex properties General no fee permit issued n/c
Multi-family and Commercial properties General 200/tank n/c
Street Obstruction - first 30 lineal fee of public right-of-way General 30 n/c
Street Obstruction - for each 20 lineal feet or fraction therof in excess
of 30 feet General 10 n/c
Re-Inspection all permits (failed/no show)General 175 n/c
Additional Inspections General 50 n/c
Off Hour Inspections General $50 administration fee plus per hour cost of inspector n/c
Const. Codes Comm. Fees:
Variances from Construction Code General 250 n/c
Administrative Appeals General 150 n/c
Demolition Tax Cap Imp/12,000 n/c
Afford Hsing
Zoning Board of Appeals
Variations from Zoning Codc General 287 n/c
Administrative Appeals General 150 n/c
Special Use Permit - Existing Developments General 655 n/c
Legal Ad Publication (as required)General 50 n/c
Plan Commission
Minor Subdivisions-Tentative Approval 2,3 or 4 lots General 2,184 n/c
payable at time of application
Minor Subdivisions-Final Approval General 250+35/lot plus n/c
engineering and recording fees n/c
Major Subdivisions-Tentative Approval 5 or more lots General $3,822+35 for each n/c
General lot over 5 n/c
Major Subdivisions-Final approval paid prior to recording of plat General $400+35/n/c
General plus $5/lot n/c
4/15/13 City Council 4 of 18
34
The City of Lake Forest
Effective May 1, 2013 or As Noted PROPOSED
Fees and Charges FY2014
Amount $$
%Projected
Fund FY2014 FEE CHANGE Revenue
General over 10; +n/c
engineering and recording fees n/c
Planned Preservation Subd Special Use Pemit plus minor/major subd fee General 2,500 n/c
Zoning Change General 3,328 n/c
Filing fee for all other developments General 788 n/c
Code Amendment General 3,328 n/c
Extension of Tentative Subdivision Plat Approval General 150 n/c
Administrative Property Line shift General 250 n/c
Legal Ad Publication (as required)General 50 n/c
Permits
Building Permits repair and maintenance under $6,000 General 30 n/c
Building Permits - $100,000 or less General 1.5% of total construction n/c
General (50 min)n/c
Building Permits - over $100,000 General 2% of 1st n/c
General $200k;n/c
General 1% of next n/c
General $300 + .5%n/c
General over $501,000 n/c
Underground storage tank removal General $50 per tank n/c
(single family and duplex)
Hot work General 25 n/c
Permit Extensions General $150 adminstration fee plus 20% of the orignal n/c
permit fee - 6 month extension
Adminstration Demolition General 250 n/c
Driveway Permits:
Residential - new curb cut General $50 per cut n/c
resurface driveway - no change General 25.00 per cut n/c
reconfiguration or change of material General 50 n/c
Commercial General $500 + $50/n/c
General unit n/c
Multi-Family General $500 + $50/n/c
General unit n/c
Sign Permits
Lights General $10/sq.ft.n/c
No Lights General $5/sq.ft.n/c
4/15/13 City Council 5 of 18
35
The City of Lake Forest
Effective May 1, 2013 or As Noted PROPOSED
Fees and Charges FY2014
Amount $$
%Projected
Fund FY2014 FEE CHANGE Revenue
Satellite Permit General 100 n/c
Satellite dish General 1.5% of cost, 50 min n/c
Plumbing
Irrigation Systems General 2.00 per head n/c
General $ 60 min n/c
Plumbing - base charge General 60+$5.50/fix.n/c
Recording of Public Right-of-Way agreement General 40 n/c
for sprinkler system
Sanitary Sewer General $50 min + 1.00/ft over 50 ft n/c
Storm Sewer General $50 min + 1.00/ft over 50 ft n/c
Street Opening
Electrical General $100, plus $1 per unit beyond 100 total units n/c
Electrical Service General 75 n/c
Electric - motors General $75 + .50 per horsepower n/c
HVAC
Residential - New or replacement
1 or 2 units General 52 n/c
Each additional unit General 45 n/c
Duct work General 52 n/c
Commercial New General $52 per 1,500 n/c
General sq ft of floor area n/c
Commerical - replacement of existing units General same as residential n/c
Sign General 1.5% construction cost n/c
General 50 min n/c
Construction Trailer Permit (Commercial Construction Sites only)General $100 per month n/c
Purchase of Parking
Space per Zoning Code General to be set by City Council at the time n/c
of approval based on market costs
Vending Licenses
Health -Restaurant (20 or Less)General 250 n/c
Health - Restaurant (21-99)General 350 n/c
Health - Restaurant (100 + Seats)General 600 n/c
Health - Itinerant Restaurant General 250 n/c
Health - Food Store General 100.00 n/c
Health - Limited Food Store (selling candy)General 50.00 n/c
Food Vendor (delivery)General $150/Veh.n/c
Milk Vendor (delivery)General $100/Veh.n/c
4/15/13 City Council 6 of 18
36
The City of Lake Forest
Effective May 1, 2013 or As Noted PROPOSED
Fees and Charges FY2014
Amount $$
%Projected
Fund FY2014 FEE CHANGE Revenue
Health - Milk Store General 100 n/c
Ice Vending Machine per machine General 110 n/c
Food Vending Machine per machine General 55 n/c
Candy Vending Machine per machine General 55 n/c
Pop/Soft drink Vending Machine per machine General 55 n/c
Milk Vending Machine per machine General 55 n/c
Tobacco vending machine per machine General 50 n/c
Card/Trinket Vending Machine per machine General 55 n/c
Amusement Machine per machine General 110 n/c
HVAC Contractor General 60 n/c
Electrical Contractor General 60 n/c
Juke Box General 25 n/c
Pool Table General 25 n/c
Elevator Inspection Fee General Variable n/c
DVD Vending Machine License General 110 n/c
Tree and Vegetation Removal
Application Review Fee General $30 n/c
Removal of Heritage Tree General $ 40 per tree n/c
Removal of tree 10" DBH or larger within the streetscape preservation General $ 40 per tree n/c
area, the front yard or the corner side yard
Removal of trees or vegetation from a Conservation Easement General $ 35 per 1 1/2 acre site n/c
Removal of trees froma Tree Preservation or No Disturbance area General $ 35 per tree n/c
Removal of trees or shrubs from any ravine or bluff General $ 35 per 1 1/2 acre site n/c
Removal of trees or shrubs from a public right of way General $ 35 per 1 1/2 acre site n/c
or other public property
Bonds
Permit Renewal - for projects with estimated construction General 13% of permit fee n/c
costs of $200,000 or less refundable upon completion
of project within one year
Permit Renewal - for projects with estimated construction General 17% of permit fee n/c
costs of more than $200,000 refundable upon completion
of project within 18 months
Fire Protection Fees:
Life Safety Plan Review Fee - New Constr/Addition General $ 500 min or .05 s.f.n/c
includes all floors
4/15/13 City Council 7 of 18
37
The City of Lake Forest
Effective May 1, 2013 or As Noted PROPOSED
Fees and Charges FY2014
Amount $$
%Projected
Fund FY2014 FEE CHANGE Revenue
Life Safety Plan Review Fee - Remodel/Alteration General $ 60 min or .05 sf n/c
includes all areas
Fire Suppression Systems (Plan review and 2 inspections)
Single Family/Duplex Residential
New General $120 or .05 per s.f whichever is greater n/c
Addition/Alteration General $60 or .05 per s.f for scope of work area n/c
whichever is greater
Flush/Pump test General No fee inspection (test)n/c
Commercial/Multi Family
New General $500 or .05 per s.f. whichever is greater n/c
Addition/Alteration General $250 or .05 s.f. for scope of work area whichever is greater n/c
Specialized Suppression (FM 200, clean agent)General $150 per system ( in addition to above fees for the overall system)n/c
Underground Flush Test General 75 n/c
Fire Pump Test General 175 n/c
Stand pipe riser General 100 n/c
Fire Alarms
Single Family/Duplex Residential General $75 or .05 per s.f. whichever is greater n/c
Commercial/Multi Family - New General $75 or .05 per s.f. whichever is greater n/c
Commercial/Multi Family - Addition/Alteration General $75 or .05 per s.f. whichever is greater n/c
Inspections/Tests
Annual Underground Flush test Water $75 + cost per gallon of water, at current rate as n/c
established by the City Council, based on pipe size
Annual Fire Pump Test Water $175 + cost per gallon of water, at current rate as n/c
established by the City Council, based on pump size
Other
Hood and Duct Extinguishing System - New General $300 per system n/c
Hood and Duct Extinguishing System - Alteration General $100 per system n/c
Altenative Letter of Credit Review General $100 per review n/c
Conditional Certificate of Occupancy (single family
and duplex)General $200 per unit n/c
Conditional Certificate of Occupancy (multi-family
and commercial)General $250 or $25 per square foot, whichever is greater,n/c
to a maximum of $1,500
4/15/13 City Council 8 of 18
38
The City of Lake Forest
Effective May 1, 2013 or As Noted PROPOSED
Fees and Charges FY2014
Amount $$
%Projected
Fund FY2014 FEE CHANGE Revenue
3. Finance
Water Utility Fees/Charges
Water Sales/1,000 Gallons
Effective with Water Bills mailed on or after May 1, 2013
Lake Forest Water 4.99 5.14 3.00%172,791
Del Mar Woods Water 6.85 7.06 3.00%0
Other Non resident users Water 6.85 7.06 3.00%Negligible
Sewer Charge/1,000 Gallons (winter usage)Water 1.16 n/c
Customer Charge - Water (Inside)
5/8" to 1.5" meter Water $20/quarter n/c
2" to 4" meter Water $100/quarter n/c
6" and above meter Water $500/quarter n/c
Customer Charge - Water (Outside)
5/8" to 1.5" meter Water $25/quarter n/c
2" to 4" meter Water $110/quarter n/c
6" and above meter Water $525/quarter n/c
Customer Charge - Sewer
5/8" to 1.5" meter Water $5/quarter n/c
2" to 4" meter Water $20/quarter n/c
6" and above meter Water $100/quarter n/c
Beach Parking Fee
Beach Parking
Temporary (R)General 85 n/c
Temporary (NR)General 910 n/c
Parking Permits
Resident-Full Year Parking 313 n/c
Resident-Monthly Parking 30/Month n/c
Resident - Unlimited Parking 1,000 n/c
Employer Purchased-Full Yr. Parking 180 n/c
Employer Purchased-Monthly Parking 20/Month n/c
Non-Resident-Full Year Parking 626 n/c
Non-Resident - Monthly Parking 60/Monthly n/c
An envelope of 10 tokens Parking 25 n/c
Telegraph Road Annual Parking Permit fka quarterly/daily Parking 700 n/c
Daily Parking Fee-Telegraph Parking 3 n/c
4/15/13 City Council 9 of 18
39
The City of Lake Forest
Effective May 1, 2013 or As Noted PROPOSED
Fees and Charges FY2014
Amount $$
%Projected
Fund FY2014 FEE CHANGE Revenue
Daily Parking Fee-All Other Parking 3 n/c
Licenses
Car , purchase on line General 80 n/c
Lt. Truck (under 8,000 lbs.) purchase on line General 80 n/c
HeavyTruck (8,000+ lbs.) purchase on line General 105 n/c
Motorcycles, purchase on line General 40 n/c
Car and Lt Truck General 85 n/c
HeavyTruck (8,000+ lbs.)General 110 n/c
Motocycles General 45 n/c
Senior Citizen 65 and over General no discount n/c
Transfers General 5 n/c
Penalties General 50%n/c
Dog License General 10 n/c
Cat License General 10 n/c
Auto Dealer License General 50+20/Veh n/c
Disabled vehicle sticker (circuit breaker)General 45 n/c
Real Estate Transfer Tax Cap Imp $4.00 per $1,000 n/c
4. Parks and Recreation
Golf Course Fees/Charges:
Seasonal Fees-Resident: effective February 15, 2013
Class A -Adult Single DPG 1,293 n/c
Class B -Adult Combo DPG 2,242 n/c
Class C -Limited DPG 960 n/c
Class D -Junior DPG 577 n/c
Class F - Senior Citizen DPG 768 n/c
Limited Plus DPG 818 n/c
Seasonal Fees (Non-Resident) effective February 15, 2013
Class A -Adult Single DPG 1,760 n/c
Class B -Adult Combo DPG 2,578 n/c
Class C -Limited DPG 1,086 n/c
Class D -Junior DPG 641 n/c
Class F - Senior Citizen DPG 1,074 n/c
Limited Plus DPG 857 n/c
4/15/13 City Council 10 of 18
40
The City of Lake Forest
Effective May 1, 2013 or As Noted PROPOSED
Fees and Charges FY2014
Amount $$
%Projected
Fund FY2014 FEE CHANGE Revenue
Daily Fees-Resident: effective January 1, 2013
Weekday-9 DPG 28 n/c
Weekday-18 DPG 42 n/c
Senior Citizen 18 (weekday)DPG 36 n/c
Weekend 9 DPG 32 n/c
Weekend -18 DPG 50 n/c
Weekday Twilight DPG 37 n/c
Weekend Twilight DPG 39 n/c
Daily Fees-Non-Resident: effective January 1, 2013
Weekday.-9 DPG 33 n/c
Weekday.-18 DPG 49 n/c
Senior Citizen 18 (weekday)DPG 40 n/c
Weekend 9 DPG 34 n/c
Weekend-18 DPG 54 n/c
League Play DPG 23 n/c
Weekday Twilight DPG 39 n/c
Weekend Twilight DPG 41 n/c
Promotional Rounds (PNI and Others)DPG 42 n/c
Electric Golf Carts: effective January 1, 2013
9 Holes DPG 24 n/c
18 Holes DPG 34 n/c
9 Holes Single Rider DPG 12 n/c
18 Holes Single Rider DPG 19 n/c
Range Balls
Small Bucket DPG 4 n/c
. Large Bucket DPG 6 n/c
Double Bucket DPG 15 n/c
Promotional Cart (PNI and other)DPG 27 n/c
Pull cart - 9 holes DPG 4 n/c
Pull cart - 18 hoes DPG 5 n/c
USGA Handicap Fees - Members DPG 34 n/c
Permanent Tee Time - Weekend DPG 300 n/c
Permanent Tee Time - Holidays DPG 50 n/c
4/15/13 City Council 11 of 18
41
The City of Lake Forest
Effective May 1, 2013 or As Noted PROPOSED
Fees and Charges FY2014
Amount $$
%Projected
Fund FY2014 FEE CHANGE Revenue
Rental Clubs DPG 20 n/c
Locker - 18 inch DPG 105 n/c
Locker - 12 inch DPG 95 n/c
Park Fees
Park Picnic Permits
0 - 50 People Parks/Rec 50 n/c
51 or more People Parks/Rec 50 n/c
Picnic Tables Parks/Rec 25 per table n/c
Grills Parks/Rec 85 per grill n/c
Boating and Beach Fees - effective February 1, 2013
Boat Ramp/Sailboat Permits-Recreation
Boat Ramp (R)Parks/Rec 424 n/c
Boat Ramp 2nd boat/ half season Parks/Rec 212 n/c
Boat Ramp (R) (Sen.) Parks/Rec 318 n/c
Boat Ramp (R) (Sen) 2nd boat/ half season Parks/Rec 159 n/c
Boat Ramp (NR) Parks/Rec 2,692 n/c
Year round storage Resident Parks/Rec 1,882 n/c
Year round storage Resident senior Parks/Rec 1,234 n/c
Year round storage non-resident Parks/Rec 5,666 n/c
Seasonal Boat Storage Resident Parks/Rec 1,273 n/c
Seasonal Boat Storage Resident Senior Parks/Rec 865 n/c
Seasonal Boat Storage Non-resident Parks/Rec 4,814 n/c
Winter Sailboat Storage (R) Parks/Rec 668 n/c
Winter Sailboat Storage (R) Senior Parks/Rec 668 n/c
Winter Sailboat Storage (Nonresident)Parks/Rec 2,409 n/c
Sailboat Racks Resident Parks/Rec 410 n/c
Sailboat Racks Resident Senior Parks/Rec 313 n/c
Sailboat Racks Non-resident Parks/Rec 2,417 n/c
South Beach Parking Permit (R)Parks/Rec 123 n/c
South Beach Parking Permit (R) (Sen.)Parks/Rec 92 n/c
South Beach Parking Permit (NR)Parks/Rec 1,511 n/c
South Beach Parking Permit Employee/Retiree Parks/Rec 84 n/c
Extra vehicle decal resident - center isle Parks/Rec 123 n/c
Extra vehicle decal senior - center isle Parks/Rec 92 n/c
Extra vehicle decal nonresident - center isle Parks/Rec 1,511 n/c
Daily Boat Launch resident Parks/Rec 38 n/c
4/15/13 City Council 12 of 18
42
The City of Lake Forest
Effective May 1, 2013 or As Noted PROPOSED
Fees and Charges FY2014
Amount $$
%Projected
Fund FY2014 FEE CHANGE Revenue
Daily Boat Launch nonresident Parks/Rec 60 n/c
Winter Sailboat Rack Storage Parks/Rec 101 n/c
Resident Guest Daily Parking Pass, limit 5 per season Parks/Rec 10 n/c
Nanny Parking Pass Parks/Rec 85 n/c
Senior Caregiver Parking Pass Parks/Rec 85 n/c
Non resident beach fee, weekends and holidays Parks/Rec 10 n/c
Fitness Center Fees - effective May 1, 2013
Fitness Center Membership Fees
Individual resident rate Parks/Rec 353 n/c
Individual resident rate - 6 months Parks/Rec 243 n/c
Individual resident rate - 3 months Parks/Rec 181 n/c
Individual non-resident rate Parks/Rec 423 n/c
Individual non-resident rate - 6 months Parks/Rec 314 n/c
Individual non-resident rate - 3 months Parks/Rec 217 n/c
Couple resident rate Parks/Rec 551 n/c
Couple resident rate - 6 months Parks/Rec 441 n/c
Couple resident rate - 3 month Parks/Rec 270 n/c
Couple non-resident rate Parks/Rec 662 n/c
Couple non-resident rate - 6 months Parks/Rec 553 n/c
Couple non-resident rate - 3 months Parks/Rec 324 n/c
Family resident rate Parks/Rec 772 n/c
Family resident rate - 6 months Parks/Rec 662 n/c
Family resident rate - 3 months Parks/Rec 357 n/c
Family non-resident rate Parks/Rec 925 n/c
Family non-resident rate - 6 months Parks/Rec 816 n/c
Family non-resident rate - 3 months Parks/Rec 430 n/c
Senior resident rate Parks/Rec 265 n/c
Senior resident rate - 6 months Parks/Rec 182 n/c
Senior resident rate - 3 months Parks/Rec 136 n/c
Senior non-resident rate Parks/Rec 317 n/c
Senior non-resident rate - 6 months Parks/Rec 235 n/c
Senior non-resident rate - 3 months Parks/Rec 163 n/c
Senior couple resident rate Parks/Rec 413 n/c
Senior couple resident rate - 6 months Parks/Rec 331 n/c
Senior couple resident rate - 3 months Parks/Rec 203 n/c
Senior couple non-resident rate Parks/Rec 497 n/c
Senior couple non-resident rate - 6 months Parks/Rec 415 n/c
Senior couple non-resident rate - 3 months Parks/Rec 243 n/c
4/15/13 City Council 13 of 18
43
The City of Lake Forest
Effective May 1, 2013 or As Noted PROPOSED
Fees and Charges FY2014
Amount $$
%Projected
Fund FY2014 FEE CHANGE Revenue
Student resident rate Parks/Rec 269 n/c
Student non-resident rate Parks/Rec 323 n/c
Matinee resident rate Parks/Rec 178 n/c
Matinee non-resident rate Parks/Rec 212 n/c
All-inclusive - member - effective December 6, 2012 Parks/Rec 279 n/c
All-inclusive - non-member - effective December 6, 2012 Parks/Rec 620 n/c
5. OCM
General Fees & Charges:
Birth certificates (January 1, 2010)General $10 first/$4 additional n/c
Death certificates (January 1, 2013)General $14 first/$6 additional n/c
On-line data entry fee by city staff ( January 1, 2010)General 10 n/c
Passport General 30 n/c
Solicitors Permit General $40 n/c
Solicitors Permit General $30 n/c
Licenses
Raffle License General 25 n/c
Tobacco License General 125 n/c
Landscapte License (March 1 to Feb 28)General 100 n/c
Alcoholic and Beverages:
Class A General 2,700 n/c
Wine Tasting General 275 n/c
Corkage Fee Option General 0 n/c
Class A-1 General 600 n/c
Class A-2 General 600 n/c
Class B General 2,200 n/c
Class B-1 General 2,000 n/c
Class C General 2,000 n/c
Class C-1 General 2,200 n/c
Class C-2 General 2,400 n/c
Class C-3 General 2,600 n/c
Class C-4 General 2,800 n/c
Class C-5 General 3,000 n/c
Class C-6 General 800 n/c
4/15/13 City Council 14 of 18
44
The City of Lake Forest
Effective May 1, 2013 or As Noted PROPOSED
Fees and Charges FY2014
Amount $$
%Projected
Fund FY2014 FEE CHANGE Revenue
Class C-7 General 800 n/c
Class D General 2,500 n/c
Class E General 3,000 n/c
Class E-1 General 2,400 n/c
Class F General 100 n/c
Class F-5 General 1,100 n/c
Class F-6 General 600 n/c
Class G General 200 n/c
Class G-1 General 600 n/c
Class H-1 General 600 n/c
Class H-2 General 1,100 n/c
Daily Liquor Licenses
Class F-1 General 75 n/c
Class F-2 General 175 n/c
Class F-3 General 75 n/c
Class F-4 General 75 n/c
Impact Fees
Library Library see ordinance
Fire and Emergency Services General see ordinance
Park Site PPL see ordinance
Park Development PPL see ordinance
Police General see ordinance
Public Works General see ordinance
School District 67 (information only)pay School see ordinance
High School District 115 (information only)pay School see ordinance
6. Police
General Fees & Charges:
Bank ID Card Fee General 25 n/c
Adult Finger Print Fee
Resident or Employee General 25 n/c
Non-resident General 200 n/c
Licenses
Taxicab General 50 n/c
Taxicab Driver General 50 n/c
4/15/13 City Council 15 of 18
45
The City of Lake Forest
Effective May 1, 2013 or As Noted PROPOSED
Fees and Charges FY2014
Amount $$
%Projected
Fund FY2014 FEE CHANGE Revenue
Taxi Business License (paid at City Hall)
New General 100 n/c
Renewal General 100 n/c
Fines & Penalties:
Overtime Parking - Lot General $15/25/50 n/c
Improper Parking - Lot General 15/25/50 n/c
Parking in Prohibited Area- Lot General 15/25/50 n/c
Overtime Parking - Other General $15/25/50 n/c
Improper Parking - Other General 15/25/50 n/c
Parking in Prohibited Area- Other General 15/25/50 n/c
Parking at Boat Ramp General 125/150/175 n/c
No Vehicle License General 75/100/125 n/c
No parking east of Sheridan Road General 125/150/175 n/c
No Animal License General 15/25/50 n/c
Dog-At-Large General 40/55/70 n/c
Code Violations General variable n/c
Motor Code Violations General variable n/c
Dog Barking General 15/25/50 n/c
Leaf Burning General 15/25/50 n/c
Handicapped Parking General 250 n/c
Dog Public Nuisance General 100/500/750 n/c
Burglar Alarm Fees General 0/50/100/250 n/c
7. Fire
General Fees & Charges:
Ambulance-Resident ALS transport General 587.40 n/c
Ambulance-Resident ALS2 transport General 703.98 n/c
Ambulance-Resident BLS transport General 524.40 n/c
Ambulance-Non Resident ALS transport General 735.63 n/c
Ambulance- Non Resident ALS2 transport General 903.98 n/c
Ambulance-Non Resident BLS transport General 666.74 n/c
Ambulance - Mileage General 6.05 per mile n/c
8. Engineering
Sewer System Connection Fee
4/15/13 City Council 16 of 18
46
The City of Lake Forest
Effective May 1, 2013 or As Noted PROPOSED
Fees and Charges FY2014
Amount $$
%Projected
Fund FY2014 FEE CHANGE Revenue
Single Family Dwelling 825 n/c
Two - family Dwelling 825 per unit n/c
Multi-family Dwelling 165 per population equiv n/c
1,650 min
Non-Residential Buildings 165 per population equiv n/c
1,650 min
Institutional buildings with Fed and State tax exempt status 825/connection n/c
Site Grading
Site Grading - New construction 500 n/c
If no grading, request may be submitted for a waiver of the requirement of 100 n/c
grading plan
Resubmittal 125 n/c
Revisions to approved grading plans 125 n/c
Tree fencing inspection fee 125 n/c
Site grading security (financial guarantee - refundable)3,000 per acre of development n/c
Water Shed Development Fee: Revised Fee Schedule
General Fees
Sediment and Erosion Control Only
Single Family Residential Lot (See site grading ordinance)see ordinance n/c
Single Family Residential Lot (within regulatory floodplain)750 n/c
Development (<10 acres)850 n/c
Development ( ≥ 10 acres)1,000 n/c
Minor Development
Without detention 2,000 n/c
With detention or Fee - in - lieu 3,000 n/c
Major Development
With detention or Fee-in-lieu 4,500 n/c
Within regulatory floodplain ( < 10 acres)3,000 n/c
Within regulatory floodplain (≥ 10 acres)4,000 n/c
Wetland Fees
Category I Wetland impacts less than or equal to 1 acre 500 + appropriate General fee n/c
Category II Wetland impacts greater than 1 acre and less than 2 acres 750 + appropriate General fee n/c
Category III Wetland impacts greater or equal to 2 acres or impacts a HQAR 1,000 + appropriate General fee n/c
Category IV Wetland impacts involving either restoration, creation 500 (< 1 acre) + applicable Gen fee n/c
or enhancement 1,000 (≥ 1 acre) + applicable Gen fee n/c
Resubmittal fee 1/3 of total Watershed Permit Fee/each resubmittal n/c
4/15/13 City Council 17 of 18
47
The City of Lake Forest
Effective May 1, 2013 or As Noted PROPOSED
Fees and Charges FY2014
Amount $$
%Projected
Fund FY2014 FEE CHANGE Revenue
Earth Change Approval 1,000 + applicable Watershed Permit Fee n/c
Securities - financial guarantee refundable 3,000 per acre of development n/c
Variances 2,200 + applicable Watershed Permit Fee n/c
Appeals 550 + applicable Watershed Permit Fee n/c
Flood Plain Analysis and Report 35 n/c
Construction Engineering Standards Manual 35 n/c
9. Senior Resources
Membership Dues
Residents of Lake Forest, Lake Bluff and unincorporated
Lake Forest and Lake Bluff Senior Resources $35 per person n/c
$55 per family n/c
Outside of Lake Forest and Lake Bluff Senior Resources $45 per person n/c
$65 per family n/c
Circuit Breaker participants Lake Forest and Lake Bluff Senior Resources $10 per person n/c
residents only $15 per family n/c
Car and Bus rides Senior Resources $3/fee each direction n/c
$6 round trip n/c
Taxi subsidy- Lake Forest and Lake Bluff residents Senior Resources 16 coupons/month n/c
living within the Lake Forest High School District for a value of $3/each n/c
4/15/13 City Council 18 of 18
48
Memorandum
TO: Chairman Kent Novit, Public Works Committee
Members of the Public Works Committee
Robert Kiely, Jr., City Manager
FROM: Michael Thomas, Director of Public Works
DATE: April 15, 2013
RE: ANALYSIS OF ELECTRIC/HYBRID/4-CYLINDER CAR PURCHASE
Introduction
Included in the FY2013 Capital Equipment Budget is $35,000 to replace one of the
five cars Community Development uses for its daily inspections. The proposed
replacement is an electric vehicle, specifically the Chevrolet Volt. Staff received
bids for a Volt in late July 2012, and with the August City Council meetings being
cancelled, requested authorization from both the Public Works and Finance
Committee Chairman to purchase the vehicle from the low bidder. At that time,
concerns were raised about the financial payback of purchasing an electric vehicle
and staff was asked to follow-up with a more thorough analysis of possible options.
Background
At their May 7, 2007 meeting, the Finance Committee reviewed a report by staff on
the potential use of hybrid and alternate fuel options in the City’s fleet. The review
included discussion on CNG (Compressed Natural Gas), propane, E-85, hybrids, and
4-cylinder gas engine vehicles. The Committee understood that because
Community Development vehicles accrued such low miles each year and the
payback period would be long, it was not financially sensible to pursue any of these
vehicles. The Finance Committee concluded the item with following motion: “When
purchasing equipment, the City shall consider purchasing equipment that uses E-85
gasoline as long as the performance is equal and there are no environmental costs
associated with the E-85 gasoline.” The motion carried unanimously. Since that
meeting, all gasoline vehicles purchased (Police Impalas, Police & Fire Tahoes, ½-
ton pick-up trucks) are E-85 flex fuel vehicles, which has become standard.
However, because the City purchases its own fuel and does not have the storage /
pumping capacity for E-85, it is important to note that the City has never used E-
85 fuel for any of these vehicles.
Community Development Cars
The City’s practice has been to transfer used Police Department Impalas to
Community Development, Building Maintenance, or the City’s Pool Vehicle fleet
once the units reach 100,000 miles. The oldest Impalas, or the ones costing the
most to maintain, are simply rotated out when new Police cars are put into service
and the old ones are passed down. On average, the Community Development
49
Page 2 of 4
Department accrues approximately 5,000 miles per year per with each of their five
cars. On average, Community Development drives approximately 35 miles per day.
Since the vehicles are already owned by the City, there is neither a charge nor an
inter-City fund transfer to “purchase” the cars from the Police Department.
Vehicle Options
The following is a list of possible options for consideration:
1. Chevrolet Volt $38,000 – bids received in July 26, 2012
2. Ford C-Max Hybrid $23,813 – Illinois State Bid
3. Ford Focus SE (4-cylinder) $16,576 – Illinois State Bid
4. Used Chevrolet Police Impala $ 0 – No charge
Chevrolet Volt
The Volt is a gas-electric hybrid, but unlike the
Toyota Prius and other hybrids, the Volt moves only
from electric motors. The gasoline engine is used to
supply energy to the batteries through a generator.
Chevrolet notes that the Volt is estimated to
provide 38 miles of driving per day gas-free. The
lithium-ion battery is charged with a 120V charging
unit over at 10-16 hour period of time. If the car is
driven over the estimated 38 miles in a day, a 1.4L
gasoline powered engine takes over. General
Motors provides an eight-year, 100,000-mile warranty on the lithium-ion battery's
161 components. It is estimated that in eight years, the battery pack and all of its
components will cost approximately $3,500-$6,000 to replace.
Ford C-Max Hybrid
Fords C-Max Hybrid operates on the
combined energy of an electric motor
powered by a lithium-ion battery and a 2.0L
Atkinson-cycle I-4 gas engine. The gas
engine kicks in extra power when needed and
provides the main source of power. Ford
estimates the vehicle to attain approximately
47 miles of City driving before requiring a
charge. Ford Motor Company also provides
an eight-year, 100,000 mile warranty on its
hybrid electrical components. It is estimated that in eight years, the battery pack
and all of its components will cost approximately $7,300 to replace.
50
Page 3 of 4
Ford Focus SE
The Ford Focus SE has a 2.0L direct injection 4-
cylinder engine with an estimated 26 mpg for City
driving.
Used Chevrolet Impala
The Chevrolet Impala has a 3.9 L V-6 gas engine.
The City’s records indicate that the Community
Development Impalas achieve, on average, 18 mpg
for City driving.
Payback Period
Used Chevrolet Impala
Average Annual Usage 9,100 miles
Gallons per Year (18 mpg) 505 gallons
Annual Fuel Cost ($3.50/gallon) $1,768
Chevrolet Volt
Purchase Amount $38,000
Less Trade ($3,000) $35,000
Annual Fuel Savings $1,768
Payback Period 20 years
Ford C-Max Hybrid
Purchase Amount $23,813
Less Trade ($3,000) $20,813
Annual Fuel Savings $1,768
Payback Period 12 years
Ford Focus SE
Average Annual Usage 9,100 miles
Gallons per Year (26 mpg) 305 gallons
Annual Fuel Cost ($3.50/gallon) $1,225
Purchase Amount $16,576
Less Trade ($3,000) $13,576
Annual Fuel Savings $543
Payback Period 25 years
51
Page 4 of 4
Staff Recommendation
The practice of reallocating used Police Department Impalas to Community
Development, Building Maintenance, and City’s Pool Vehicle fleet has occurred for
over thirty years. For this analysis, it continues to be economically sensible to
transfer used Chevrolet Impalas to other City departments, as they have already
been paid for in-full. However, staff recognizes that there are environmental
benefits of pursuing an electric or hybrid car. The decision therefore becomes a
policy issue for the City Council.
52
March 29, 2013
Mr. Michael Thomas
Director of Public Works
City of Lake Forest
800 North Field Drive
Lake Forest, IL 60045
Re: Contract Extension
City Engineering Services
Lake Forest, Illinois
Dear Mr. Thomas:
Thank you for inviting Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. to continue to serve as the City Engineer of Lake Forest.
Our firm is well qualified to perform this work and is quite interested in continuing to serve the City of Lake
Forest.
If you should have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc.
Steven D. Berecz, P.E.
Secretary/Senior Engineer
sberecz@gha-engineers.com
53
CITY OF LAKE FOREST
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This AGREEMENT is dated as of the ____ day of ___________, 2013 (“Agreement”),
and is by and between the CITY OF LAKE FOREST, an Illinois municipal corporation
(“City”) and the Consultant identified in Section 1A of this Agreement.
IN CONSIDERATION OF the recitals and the mutual covenants and agreements set
forth in the Agreement, and pursuant to the City’s statutory powers, the parties agree as follows:
SECTION 1. CONSULTANT.
A. Engagement of Consultant. The City has an existing agreement with the
Consultant to provide professional engineering consulting services as City Engineer on an as-
needed basis with a term set to expire on April 30, 2013. The City desires to extend the term of
the agreement with the Consultant identified below to perform and to provide all necessary
professional consulting services to perform the work in connection with the project identified
below:
Consultant Name ("Consultant"): Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc.
Address: 850 Forest Edge Drive
Street
Vernon Hills, Illinois 60061
City State Zip
Telephone No.: (847) 478-9700
Email: dstrahan@gha-engineers.com
Project Name/Description: PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES AS CITY
ENGINEER
Agreement Amount: T&M
B. Project Description. Consultant shall provide as–needed engineering consulting
services relating to municipal engineering services and to fulfill the statutory requirements
normally conducted by a City Engineer. This work shall be “on-call” as requested or directed by
the City’s Director of Public Works or his designee.
C. Representations of Consultant. The Consultant has submitted to the City a
summary of hourly rates and key personnel, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A to this
Agreement ("Statement"). The Consultant represents that it is financially solvent, has the
necessary financial resources, and is sufficiently experienced and competent to perform and
complete the consulting services set forth in the Request and the Statement ("Services") in a
manner consistent with the standards of professional practice by recognized consulting firms
providing services of a similar nature in the Northeastern Illinois region.
54
D. Agreement Amount. The total amount billed by the Consultant for the services
under this Agreement shall be limited to actual services performed as authorized by the Public
Works Director or his designee as outlined in the Request. Hourly Rates will match the rates in
Exhibit A, including reimbursable expenses, unless amended pursuant to Section 8A of this
Agreement.
E. Agreement Length. The agreement shall be in effect through April 30, 2016
starting upon the date this agreement is pursued. Hourly Rates will match the rates in Exhibit A
and will remain in effect until April 30, 2014. Hourly rates from May 2, 2014 until April 30,
2016 will match those rates stated in Exhibit A.
SECTION 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES.
A. Retention of the Consultant. The City retains the Consultant to perform, and the
Consultant agrees to perform, the Services.
B. Services. The Consultant shall provide the Services pursuant to the terms and
conditions of this Agreement.
C. Commencement; Time of Performance. The Consultant shall be prepared to
commence the Services immediately upon receipt of written notice from the City that this
Agreement has been fully executed by the Parties (“Commencement Date”). The Consultant
shall diligently and continuously prosecute the Services until the completion of the Services or
upon the termination of this Agreement by the City.
D. Reporting. The Consultant shall regularly report to the Public Works Director, or
his designee, regarding the progress of the Services during the term of this Agreement.
SECTION 3. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.
A. Compensation. The total amount billed for the Services during the term of this
Agreement shall be limited to actual services performed as authorized by the Public Works
Director or his designee. Hourly Rates will match the rates in Exhibit A and will remain in
effect until April 30, 2014. Hourly rates from May 2, 2014 until April 30, 2016 will match those
rates stated in Exhibit A.
B. Invoices and Payment. The Consultant shall submit invoices in an approved
format to the City for costs incurred by the Consultant in performing the Services. The amount
billed in such invoice for the Services shall be based on the rates set forth in the Statement. The
City shall pay to the Consultant the amount billed within 30 days after receiving such an invoice.
C. Records. The Consultant shall maintain records showing actual time devoted and
costs incurred, and shall permit the authorized representative of the City to inspect and audit all
data and records of the Consultant for work done under the Agreement. The records shall be
made available to the City at reasonable times during the Agreement period, and for a year after
the termination of the Agreement.
55
D. Claim In Addition To Agreement Amount. If the Consultant desires to make a
claim for additional compensation as a result of action taken by the City, the Consultant shall
provide written notice to the City of such claim within 15 days after occurrence of such action as
provided by Section 8D, Notice, of this Agreement, and no claim for additional compensation
shall be valid unless made in accordance with this Section. Any changes in the Agreement
Amount shall be valid only upon written amendment pursuant to Section 8A, Amendment, of
this Agreement.
E. Taxes, Benefits, and Royalties Each payment by the City to the Consultant
includes all applicable federal, state, and City taxes of every kind and nature applicable to the
Services as well as all taxes, contributions, and premiums for unemployment insurance, old age
or retirement benefits, pensions, annuities, or similar benefits and all costs, royalties, and fees
arising from the use on, or the incorporation into, the Services, of patented or copyrighted
equipment, materials, supplies, tools, appliances, devices, processes, or inventions. All claim or
right to claim additional compensation by reason of the payment of any such tax, contribution,
premium, costs, royalties, or fees is hereby waived and released by Consultant.
F. Final Acceptance. The Services, or, if the Services are to be performed in
separate phases, each phase of the Services, shall be considered complete on the date of final
written acceptance by the City of the Services or each phase of the Services, as the case may be,
which acceptance shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed.
SECTION 4. PERSONNEL; SUBCONTRACTORS.
A. Key Project Personnel. The Key Project Personnel identified in Exhibit A shall
be primarily responsible for carrying out the Services on behalf of the Consultant. The Key
Project Personnel shall not be changed without the City's prior written approval.
B. Availability of Personnel. The Consultant shall provide all personnel necessary
to complete the Services including, without limitation, any Key Project Personnel identified in
this Agreement. The Consultant shall notify the City as soon as practicable prior to terminating
the employment of, reassigning, or receiving notice of the resignation of, any Key Personnel.
The Consultant shall have no claim for damages and shall not bill the City for additional time
and materials charges as the result of any portion of the Services which must be duplicated or
redone due to such termination or for any delay or extension of the Time of Performance as a
result of any such termination, reassigning, or resignation.
C. Approval and Use of Subcontractors. The Consultant shall perform the
Services with its own personnel and under the management, supervision, and control of its own
organization unless otherwise approved by the City in writing. All subcontractors and
subcontracts used by the Consultant shall be acceptable to, and approved in advance by, the City.
The City’s approval of any subcontractor or subcontract shall not relieve the Consultant of full
responsibility and liability for the provision, performance, and completion of the Services as
required by the Agreement. All Services performed under any subcontract shall be subject to all
of the provisions of this Agreement in the same manner as if performed by employees of the
Consultant. For purposes of this Agreement, the term “Consultant” shall be deemed also to refer
56
to all subcontractors of the Consultant, and every subcontract shall include a provision binding
the subcontractor to all provisions of this Agreement.
D. Removal of Personnel and Subcontractors. If any personnel or subcontractor
fails to perform the Services in a manner satisfactory to the City, the Consultant shall
immediately upon notice from the City remove and replace such personnel or subcontractor. The
Consultant shall have no claim for damages, for compensation in excess of the amount contained
in this Agreement or for a delay or extension of the Time of Performance as a result of any such
removal or replacement.
SECTION 5. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.
A. Confidential Information. The term “Confidential Information” shall mean
information in the possession or under the control of the City relating to the technical, business,
or corporate affairs of the City; City property; user information, including, without limitation,
any information pertaining to usage of the City's computer system, including and without
limitation, any information obtained from server logs or other records of electronic or machine
readable form; and the existence of, and terms and conditions of, this Agreement. City
Confidential Information shall not include information that can be demonstrated: (1) to have
been rightfully in the possession of the Consultant from a source other than the City prior to the
time of disclosure of said information to the Consultant under this Agreement (“Time of
Disclosure”); (2) to have been in the public domain prior to the Time of Disclosure; (3) to have
become part of the public domain after the Time of Disclosure by a publication or by any other
means except an unauthorized act or omission or breach of this Agreement on the part of the
Consultant or the City; or (4) to have been supplied to the Consultant after the Time of
Disclosure without restriction by a third party who is under no obligation to the City to maintain
such information in confidence.
B. No Disclosure of Confidential Information by the Consultant. The Consultant
acknowledges that it shall, in performing the Services for the City under this Agreement, have
access to or be directly or indirectly exposed to Confidential Information. The Consultant shall
hold confidential all Confidential Information and shall not disclose or use such Confidential
Information without express prior written consent of the City. The Consultant shall use
reasonable measures at least as strict as those the Consultant uses to protect its own confidential
information. Such measures shall include, without limitation, requiring employees and
subcontractors of the Consultant to execute a non-disclosure agreement before obtaining access
to Confidential Information.
SECTION 6. STANDARD OF SERVICES AND INDEMNIFICATION.
A. Representation and Certification of Services. The Consultant represents and
certifies that the Services shall be performed in accordance with the standards of professional
practice and care practiced by consulting firms in performing services of a similar nature in
Northeast Illinois at the Time of Performance.
B. Indemnification. The Consultant agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by
law, to indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officials, and employees (collectively, City)
57
against all damage, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and defense costs, to
the extent caused by the Consultant’s negligent performance of professional services under this
Agreement and that of its subconsultants or anyone for whom the Consultant is legally liable.
The City agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold harmless the
Consultant, its officers, directors, employees and subconsultants (collectively, Consultant)
against all damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and defense costs, to
the extent caused by the City’s negligent acts in connection with services provided under this
agreement and the acts of its contractors, subcontractors or consultants or anyone for whom the
City is legally liable. Neither the City nor the Consultant shall be obligated to indemnify the
other party in any manner whatsoever for the other party’s own negligence.
C. Insurance. The Consultant proposes, and agrees that the Consultant shall provide
certificates and policies of insurance evidencing the minimum insurance coverages and limits set
forth in Exhibit B to this Agreement within 10 days following the Commencement Date. Such
policies shall be in forms, and from companies, acceptable to the City. The insurance coverages
and limits set forth in Exhibit B shall be deemed to be minimum coverages and limits and shall not
be construed in any way as a limitation on the Consultant’s duty to carry adequate insurance or on
the Consultant’s liability for losses or damages under this Agreement. The City shall be named as
an Additional Insured on all policies except for Worker’s Compensation, Professional Liability (if
applicable). Each such additional Insured endorsement shall identify the City as follows: The City
of Lake Forest, including its City Council members and elected and appointed officials, its officers,
employees, agents, attorneys, consultants, and representatives.
D. No Personal Liability. No elected or appointed official, or employee of the City
shall be personally liable, in law or in contract, to the Consultant as the result of the execution of
this Agreement.
SECTION 7. CONSULTANT AGREEMENT GENERAL PROVISIONS.
A. Relationship of the Parties. The Consultant shall act as an independent
contractor in providing and performing the Services. Nothing in, nor done pursuant to, this
Agreement shall be construed (1) to create the relationship of principal and agent, employer and
employee, partners, or joint venturers between the City and Consultant; or (2) to create any
relationship between the City and any subcontractor of the Consultant. The consultant shall have
no right to receive any employee benefits including, but not limited to, health and accident
insurance, life insurance, pension, sick leave and/or vacation. Consultant agrees to pay all taxes
including, but not limited to, employment taxes due in respect of the consulting fee.
B. Conflict of Interest. The Consultant represents and certifies that, to the best of its
knowledge, (1) no City employee or agent is interested in the business of the Consultant or this
Agreement; (2) as of the date of this Agreement neither the Consultant nor any person employed
or associated with the Consultant has any interest that would conflict in any manner or degree
with the performance of the obligations under this Agreement; and (3) neither the Consultant nor
any person employed by or associated with the Consultant shall at any time during the term of
this Agreement obtain or acquire any interest that would conflict in any manner or degree with
the performance of the obligations under this Agreement.
58
C. No Collusion. The Consultant represents and certifies that the Consultant is not
barred from contracting with a unit of state or local government as a result of (1) a delinquency
in the payment of any tax administered by the Illinois Department of Revenue unless the
Consultant is contesting, in accordance with the procedures established by the appropriate
revenue act, its liability for the tax or the amount of the tax, as set forth in Section 11-42.1-1 et
seq. of the Illinois Municipal Code, 65 ILCS 5/11-42.1-1 et seq.; or (2) a violation of either
Section 33E-3 or Section 33E-4 of Article 33E of the Criminal Code of 1961, 720 ILCS 5/33E-1
et seq. The Consultant represents that the only persons, firms, or corporations interested in this
Agreement as principals are those disclosed to the City prior to the execution of this Agreement,
and that this Agreement is made without collusion with any other person, firm, or corporation. If
at any time it shall be found that the Consultant has, in procuring this Agreement, colluded with
any other person, firm, or corporation, then the Consultant shall be liable to the City for all loss
or damage that the City may suffer, and this Agreement shall, at the City’s option, be null and
void.
D. Termination. Notwithstanding any other provision hereof, the City may
terminate this Agreement at any time upon 15 days prior written notice to the Consultant. In the
event that this Agreement is so terminated, the Consultant shall be paid for Services actually
performed and reimbursable expenses actually incurred, if any, prior to termination, not
exceeding the value of the Services completed determined on the basis of the rates set forth in
the Proposal.
E. Default. If it should appear at any time that the Consultant has failed or refused
to prosecute, or has delayed in the prosecution of, the Services with diligence at a rate that
assures completion of the Services in full compliance with the requirements of this Agreement,
or has otherwise failed, refused, or delayed to perform or satisfy the Services or any other
requirement of this Agreement (“Event of Default”), and fails to cure any such Event of Default
within ten business days after the Consultant’s receipt of written notice of such Event of Default
from the City, then the City shall have the right, without prejudice to any other remedies
provided by law or equity, to pursue any one or more of the following remedies:
1. Cure by Consultant. The City may require the Consultant, within a
reasonable time, to complete or correct all or any part of the Services that are the subject
of the Event of Default; and to take any or all other action necessary to bring the
Consultant and the Services into compliance with this Agreement.
2. Termination of Agreement by City. The City may terminate this
Agreement without liability for further payment of amounts due or to become due under
this Agreement after the effective date of termination.
3. Withholding of Payment by City. The City may withhold from any
payment, whether or not previously approved, or may recover from the Consultant, any
and all costs, including attorneys’ fees and administrative expenses, incurred by the City
as the result of any Event of Default by the Consultant or as a result of actions taken by
the City in response to any Event of Default by the Consultant.
59
F. Mutual Cooperation. The City agrees to cooperate with the Consultant in the
performance of the Services, including meeting with the Consultant and providing the Consultant
with such non-confidential information that the City may have that may be relevant and helpful
to the Consultant’s performance of the Services. The Consultant agrees to cooperate with the
City in the performance of and the completion of the Services and with any other consultants
engaged by the City.
G. News Releases. The Consultant shall not issue any news releases or other public
statements regarding the Services without prior approval from the City Manager.
H. Ownership. Designs, drawings, plans, specifications, photos, reports,
information, observations, calculations, notes, and any other documents, data, or information, in
any form, prepared, collected, or received by the Consultant in connection with any or all of the
Services to be performed under this Agreement (“Documents”) shall be and remain the
exclusive property of the City. At the City’s request, or upon termination of this Agreement, the
Consultant shall cause the Documents to be promptly delivered to the City.
SECTION 8. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
A. Amendment. No amendment or modification to this Agreement shall be
effective unless and until the amendment or modification is in writing, properly approved in
accordance with applicable procedures, and executed.
B. Assignment. This Agreement may not be assigned by the City or by the
Consultant without the prior written consent of the other party.
C. Binding Effect. The terms of this Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit
of the Parties to this Agreement and their agents, successors, and assigns.
D. Notice. All notices required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall
be in writing and shall be delivered (1) personally, (2) by a reputable overnight courier, or by (3)
by certified mail, return receipt requested, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid.
Unless otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, notices shall be deemed received upon
the earlier of (a) actual receipt; (b) one business day after deposit with an overnight courier as
evidenced by a receipt of deposit; or (c) three business days following deposit in the U.S. mail,
as evidenced by a return receipt. By notice complying with the requirements of this Section,
each Party shall have the right to change the address or the addressee, or both, for all future
notices and communications to the other party, but no notice of a change of addressee or address
shall be effective until actually received.
Notices and communications to the City shall be addressed to, and delivered at, the following
address:
Michael Thomas
Director of Public Works
800 North Field Drive
Lake Forest, IL 60045
60
Notices and communications to the Consultant shall be addressed to, and delivered at, the
following address:
Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc.
850 Forest Edge Drive
Vernon Hills, Illinois 60061
Attention: Steven D. Berecz, Corporate Secretary
E. Third Party Beneficiary. No claim as a third party beneficiary under this
Agreement by any person, firm, or corporation shall be made or be valid against the City.
F. Provisions Severable. If any term, covenant, condition, or provision of this
Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the
remainder of the provisions shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected,
impaired, or invalidated.
G. Time. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.
H. Calendar Days and Time. Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement, any
reference in this Agreement to "day" or "days" shall mean calendar days and not business days.
If the date for giving of any notice required to be given, or the performance of any obligation,
under this Agreement falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or federal holiday, then the notice or
obligation may be given or performed on the next business day after that Saturday, Sunday, or
federal holiday.
I. Governing Laws. This Agreement shall be governed by, construed and enforced
in accordance with the internal laws, but not the conflicts of laws rules, of the State of Illinois.
J. Authority to Execute.
1. The City. The City hereby warrants and represents to the
Consultant that the persons executing this Agreement on its behalf have been properly
authorized to do so by its corporate authorities.
2. The Consultant. The Consultant hereby warrants and represents to
the City that the persons executing this Agreement on its behalf have the full and
complete right, power, and authority to enter into this Agreement and to agree to the
terms, provisions, and conditions set forth in this Agreement and that all legal actions
needed to authorize the execution, delivery, and performance of this Agreement have
been taken.
K. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the
parties to this Agreement and supersedes all prior agreements and negotiations between the
parties, whether written or oral relating to the subject matter of this Agreement.
L. Waiver. Neither the City nor the Consultant shall be under any obligation to
exercise any of the rights granted to them in this Agreement except as it shall determine to be in
its best interest from time to time. The failure of the City or the Consultant to exercise at any
61
time any such rights shall not be deemed or construed as a waiver of that right, nor shall the
failure void or affect the City's or the Consultant's right to enforce such rights or any other rights.
M. Consents. Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement, whenever the consent,
permission, authorization, approval, acknowledgement, or similar indication of assent of any
party to this Agreement, or of any duly authorized officer, employee, agent, or representative of
any party to this Agreement, is required in this Agreement, the consent, permission,
authorization, approval, acknowledgement, or similar indication of assent shall be in writing.
N. Grammatical Usage and Construction. In construing this Agreement, pronouns
include all genders and the plural includes the singular and vice versa.
O. Interpretation. This Agreement shall be construed without regard to the identity
of the party who drafted the various provisions of this Agreement. Moreover, each and every
provision of this Agreement shall be construed as though all parties to this Agreement
participated equally in the drafting of this Agreement. As a result of the foregoing, any rule or
construction that a document is to be construed against the drafting party shall not be applicable
to this Agreement.
P. Headings. The headings, titles, and captions in this Agreement have been
inserted only for convenience and in no way define, limit, extend, or describe the scope or intent
of this Agreement.
Q. Exhibits. Exhibits A and B are attached to this Agreement, and by this reference
incorporated in and made a part of, this Agreement. In the event of a conflict between the
Exhibit and the text of this Agreement, the text of this Agreement shall control.
R. Rights Cumulative. Unless expressly provided to the contrary in this
Agreement, each and every one of the rights, remedies, and benefits provided by this Agreement
shall be cumulative and shall not be exclusive of any other rights, remedies, and benefits allowed
by law.
S. Counterpart Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several
counterparts, each of which, when executed, shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which
together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
62
ATTEST: CITY OF LAKE FOREST
By: By:
Margaret Boyer, Deputy City Clerk Donald P. Schoenheider, Acting Mayor
ATTEST: CONSULTANT
By: By:
Steven D. Berecz, Corporate Secretary Bruce L. Shrake, President
63
EXHIBIT A
HOURLY RATES & KEY PERSONNEL
Hourly Rates
Staff Description Rates for:
5/1/13 to 4/30/14
Principal Engineer $150/hr
Senior Engineer/Project Manager $124/hr
Professional Eng./Project Consultant $104/hr
GIS Professional $104/hr
Staff Engineer $96/hr
Senior Engineering Technician $98/hr
Engineering Technician II $84/hr
Engineering Technician I $60/hr
Clerical $48/hr
Staff Description Rates for:
5/1/14 to 4/30/16
Principal Engineer $156/hr
Senior Engineer/Project Manager $128/hr
Professional Eng./Project Consultant $108/hr
GIS Professional $108/hr
Staff Engineer $100/hr
Senior Engineering Technician $102/hr
Engineering Technician II $88/hr
Engineering Technician I $62/hr
Clerical $50/hr
All hourly rates include costs for AutoCAD systems/software, vehicles and equipment.
Direct costs are defined as follows:
GHA Direct Costs through 4/30/2016
Mileage $0.50/mi
Vehicles/equipment no charge
CADD software/systems no charge
Black and white printing - up to 11” x 17” no charge
Large-format black and white printing $0.25/sf
Color prints up to 11” x 17” $0.50/page
Large-format color plots $3.00/sf
Expenses such as sub-consultant costs, overnight postage, and messenger services are invoiced without markup.
64
Key Personnel
We propose the following key personnel to be the primary team for the City of Lake Forest, with assistance
from others, as required:
Steven D. Berecz, P.E. is a Partner and Member of the Board, and a Registered Professional Engineer
practicing for the past 19 years as a Civil Engineer with emphasis on municipal engineering, site
development, storm water management and construction engineering. Mr. Berecz is currently the Village
Engineer for the Village of Lincolnwood, and has worked directly for numerous municipalities including the
Villages of Inverness, Skokie, Wilmette, and Niles, and the Cities of Evanston, Des Plaines, and Chicago.
He has also worked with many park districts, school districts, and residential and commercial developers,
and on a variety of civil site design projects.
Due to his vast municipal experience, Mr. Berecz has created a professional relationship with the following
governing entities; Illinois Department of Transportation, Lake County Stormwater Management
Commission, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, US Army Corps of Engineers, and Federal Highway
Administration.
Primary Contact: Mr. Daniel J. Strahan, P.E., CFM is currently the Village Engineer for the Village of
Barrington Hills (Cook, Lake, Kane, and McHenry County); and Assistant Village Engineer for the Villages
of Deer Park (Lake County) and Golf (Cook County). Responsibilities include: Permit review and
enforcement of Zoning, Building, and Floodplain ordinances; Preparation of revisions to septic, grading,
and floodplain ordinances; preparation of 10-year Road Program; Street maintenance and rehabilitation;
engineering review of subdivision plans; local and regional drainage studies, drainage improvement design
and installation.
Mr. Daniel Brinkman, P.E., PTOE is a Licensed Professional Engineer with over 15 years of experience in
the traffic engineering and transportation planning fields. His experience covers both the public and private
sectors, with clients including municipalities, retail and residential developers, school districts, park districts
and hospitals/medical centers.
John Past, PLS, is a Licensed Professional Surveyor with more than 30 years of experience with
emphasis on Topographical Surveys, A.L.T.A/A.C.S.M. Surveys, Settlement Monitoring Surveys, Boundary
Surveys, Plats of Right of Way, Easement, Dedication, Subdivision, and Annexation.
65
EXHIBIT B
INSURANCE COVERAGES
Coverage Limits of Liability
Worker’s Compensation Statutory
General Liability $1,000,000 Each Occurrence
$2,000,000 General Aggregate
Products and completed operations aggregate
$2,000,000
Automobile Liability $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit
Professional Liability $1,000,000 each claim
$2,000,000 Aggregate
Excess/Umbrella Liability $2,000,000 Each Occurrence
$2,000,000 Aggregate
66
The City of Lake Forest
CITY COUNCIL
Proceedings of the March 18, 2013 Regular Meeting
7:30 p.m. – City Hall Council Chambers
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: The Honorable Acting Mayor Don Schoenheider called the meeting to
order at 7:45 p.m. Deputy City Clerk Margaret Boyer called the roll of Council members. Present:
Alderman Novit, Alderman Waldeck, Alderman Moore, Alderman Tack, Alderman Reisenberg, Alderman
Palmer and Alderman Adelman.
Absent: Alderman Pandaleon. Quorum present.
Also present were: Robert Kiely, City Manager; Vic Filippini, City Attorney; Marlo Del Percio, City
Attorney; Catherine Czerniak, Director of Community Development, Michael Thomas, Director of Public
Works; Bob Ells, Engineering Supervisor; Mary VanArsdale, Director of Parks & Recreation; Chuck Myers;
Superintendent of Parks and Forestry; Jeff Wait, Superintendent of Special Facilities and Carina Walters,
Assistant City Manager.
There were approximately 25+ present in the audience.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all in attendance.
Reports of City Officers
1. Comments by Mayor
Acting Mayor Schoenheider thanked Alderman Novit for Sitting in as Acting Mayor at
the February19th Council meeting.
2. Comments by City Manager
Bob Kiely introduced Susan Kelsey, Economic Development Coordinator for the City of
Lake Forest.
A. Lake Forest Business Incubator + Technology Update. The Lake Forest
Business Incubator falls under the strategic plan and is part of local
movement continuum; the goal is to grow local businesses and local jobs.
In now its 5th year the Incubators plan is to fill the office space within Lake
Forest to 100%. James Dean, Meg Barnhardt and John Walsh each gave
an overview on how the Lake Forest Incubator has affected each of their
businesses and how the Incubator will play a key role in their future.
B. Approval of Financial Support for Friends of Parks and Recreation
Foundation Festival & Fireworks was presented by Friends President, Mark
Milliman, who stated this is the seventh (7th) year of the event. The goal of
the Foundation is to offer an outstanding Independence Day Celebration
67
Proceedings of the March 18, 2013 Regular Meeting
for the entire community while showcasing the Friends Foundation and
generating capital and scholarship funds on behalf of the City’s Parks and
Recreation Department. In addition to the Fred Jackson Golf Outing
which fundraises approximately $15,000 annually, the Festival and
Fireworks is the Foundation’s largest fundraising event. The Foundation’s
Festival goal is to net over $50,000 annually for the benefit of the Parks and
Recreation Department. The 2013 event is scheduled for Thursday, July 4th
and attendence is estimated to exceed 11,000. This event has become a
family tradition that is enjoyed by residents of all ages. With the support of
Lake Forest Bank & Trust, the 2013 Festival will feature Dennis DeYoung,
formerly of Styx as the main stage entertainment, and The Onwentsia Club
has agreed to again allow the staging of the fireworks on its property.
Alderman Moore moved to approve waiving personnel expense up to a maximum of
$25,000 and provide a fireworks contribution of $10,000 to the Friends of Parks and
Recreation Foundation for the July 4, 2013 Festival and Fireworks, seconded by
Alderman Palmer.
The following voted “Yea” Aldermen Novit, Waldeck, Moore, Tack, Reisenberg, Palmer
and Adelman. The following voted “Nay” None. 7 Yea 0 Nay, Motion carried.
Bob Kiely, City Manager, gave an update on EAB following a conversation that was
held in the finance meeting. EAB can be broken into three parts;
1 Resident Guide- May 2013
Website link to information, in addition to a workshop on Saturday June 1
at Gorton Community Center for Lake Forest and Lake Bluff residents.
2 Parks & Public Property 2013
Development and inventory of additional City Properties; forward that
data to PPL and P & R Board.
3 Street Trees ROW 2013
From an esthetics standpoint use the data from PPL & P & R Board to
determine treatment vs. removal. The City Council will need to adopt a
tree removal policy at the recommendation of the PPL and P & R Board.
City staff recommends that the Council __________ on upcoming and the long term
issues with EAB as this is a dynamic, ever-changing program that deals with a living
68
Proceedings of the March 18, 2013 Regular Meeting
organism. Action taken: Council plans to increase FY 14 CIP for EAB from 200,000 to
400,000.
3. Comments by Council Members
A. As a result of the “Report on February 20th Community Engagement Meeting-
Granny Flats” Alderman Moore made a recommendation to direct the Plan
Commission to consider and hold public hearings on possible amendments to
the Zoning Code to authorize secondary living units on properties in existing
coach houses, carriage houses, and garage apartments. He recommended that
the “Opportunities” and “Concerns” from the Community Engagement Forum
be used to guide research, study and discussion. He also recommended that the
Construction Codes Commission hold discussions on minimum health and life
safety standards for accessory building living units.
Alderman Novit moved to make the recommendation, seconded by Alderman
Pandaleon. Motion carried unanimously by Voice Vote.
Acting Mayor Schoenheider encouraged residents to attend the Community
Engagement Meetings as City Council is seeking feedback and input from residents.
Community Engagement Meetings Schedule as follows;
Apr
18
Community Engagement Forum: "Differentiated
Housing Opportunities"
7-8:30 p.m. Gorton Community
Center
May
16
Community Engagement Forum: "Native
Plantings"
7-8:30 p.m. Gorton Community
Center
Jun
20
Community Engagement Forum: "Refuse
Collection & Recycling"
7-8:30 p.m. Gorton Community
Center
July
18
Community Engagement Forum:
"Water/Waste/Recycling & Energy"
7-8:30 p.m. Gorton Community
Center
Sep Community Engagement Forum: "Vitality of the 7-8:30 p.m. Gorton Community
69
Proceedings of the March 18, 2013 Regular Meeting
19 Central Business District" Center
Oct
17
Community Engagement Forum: "Ravines" 7-8:30 p.m. Gorton Community
Center
Nov
21
Community Engagement Forum: "Resolving
Disputes with Neighbors"
7-8:30 p.m. Gorton Community
Center
OPPORTUNITY FOR CITIZENS TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
None
Acting Mayor Donald Schoenheider read the ITEMS FOR OMNIBUS VOTE
CONSIDERATION
1. City Council Approval to Authorize Winter 2013/2014 Salt Purchases
2. Award of Purchase for the Replacement of a One-Ton Dump Truck for the Parks
Section Included in the FY2014 Capital Equipment Budget
3. SUBJECT: Approval of Capital Expense and award of bid for Replacement of
Recreation Center Public Restroom Lockers and Benches
4. Approval of a One-Year (1) New World Software Maintenance Agreement with
New World Systems covering Police and Fire Software Programs.
5. Consideration of an Ordinance Approving a Recommendation from the Building
Review Board. (First Reading and if desired by the City Council, Final Approval)
6. Approval of the March 4, 2013 regular City Council minutes
Alderman Novit moved to approve the six Omnibus items as presented, seconded by
Alderman Palmer. The following voted “Yea” Novit, Waldeck, Moore, Tack, Reisenberg,
Palmer and Adelman. The following voted “Nay” None. 7-0 Motion carries.
70
Proceedings of the March 18, 2013 Regular Meeting
1. Consideration of an Ordinance Amending The City of Lake Forest Liquor Code
(First Reading)
The City Council directed the City Attorney and City staff to take a comprehensive look
at the liquor code to make sure it was up to date and in compliance with state law and
current local practices. In addition the liquor code was to be reviewed to ensure what
type of liquor license and numbers of liquor licenses are available for each category.
The Mayor is the designated Liquor Commissioner. The Commissioner and the City
Council have the authority to establish licensing and other regulations related to the
sale of alcoholic beverages.
City Attorney Victor Filippini gave an overview of what was updated in the current
liquor code. In an effort to consolidate licensing categories the code was paired down
from twenty-eight (28) to nineteen (19) and two (2) new special use licenses were
added. A provision was added to provide flexibility in conditions and waiving fees;
waiving of fees for a government unit on City property and conditions to authorize the
Liquor Commissioner through conditions on permits; a better impact rather than
another class of sales. Other changes to the code included eliminating the restriction
on gas stations, adding changes in law and best management practices.
Alderman Reisenberg made a motion to accept first reading, with the provision that
wording restricting licensing gas station to sell liquor is replaced, and clarification as to
fees and time frame is made to specific classes as discussed, seconded by Alderman
Moore.
The following voted “Yea” Novit, Waldeck, Moore, Tack, Reisenberg, Palmer and
Adelman. The following voted “Nay” None. 7-0 Motion carries.
NEW BUSINESS
None
ADDITIONAL ITEMS FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION
None
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Alderman Palmer made a motion to adjourn at 9:00pm,
seconded by Alderman Novit. Motion carried unanimously by voice vote.
71
Proceedings of the March 18, 2013 Regular Meeting
Respectfully Submitted,
Margaret Boyer
Deputy City Clerk
72
RESOLUTION NO. _______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, ILLINOIS
REALLOCATING 2013 VOLUME CAP
TO THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, ILLINOIS
WHEREAS, the City of Lake Forest, Lake County, Illinois the (“Municipality”), is a
municipality and a home rule unit of government duly organized and validly existing under
Section 6(a) of Article VII of the 1970 Constitution and laws of the State of Illinois; and
WHEREAS, certain tax exempt private activity bonds may be issued only if sufficient
volume cap pursuant to Section 146 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
“Code”), is available for the bonds; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Code, the Municipality has been allocated volume cap equal
to $95.00 per resident of the Municipality in calendar year 2013, or $1,847,560.00 for the
issuance of such tax exempt private activity bonds; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 6 and Section 6.1 of the Illinois Private Activity Bond
Allocation Act, 30 ILCS 345/1 et seq. (the “Bond Allocation Act), and the Guidelines and
Procedures promulgated thereunder, the Municipality may, prior to May 1, 2013, reallocate to
other home rule units of government the volume cap allocated to the Municipality by the Code
for their issuance of such tax exempt private activity bonds or for subsequent transfer or
reallocation; and
WHEREAS, the Municipality has not used any of its 2013 volume cap and has no
present intention to use the same; and
WHEREAS, the Lake County Partnership for Economic Development, Inc. has offered
Lake County home rule communities the opportunity to participate in a program to combine their
respective volume cap allocations and create a Private Activity Bond Clearinghouse Pool (the
“Pool”) to facilitate the issuance of tax-exempt private activity bonds to finance, manufacturing
and multi-family housing commercial projects in Lake County, Illinois, for economic development
purposes (“Eligible Projects”); and
WHEREAS, the Village of Buffalo Grove, a home rule unit of government (“Buffalo
Grove”), pursuant to its Resolution No. 2001-51 adopted December 17, 2001, agreed to host
the Pool and to reserve its own volume cap, and accept volume cap reallocated to Buffalo
Grove by other home rule units of government, for the issuance of tax-exempt private activity
bonds placed through the Pool to finance Eligible Projects; and
WHEREAS, Buffalo Grove has requested that the Muncipality reallocate all of its 2013
volume cap to Buffalo Grove to be used for the issuance of tax-exempt private activity bonds
placed through the Pool to finance Eligible Projects;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE GOVERNING BOARD/COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS, as follows:
Section 1: Pursuant to Section 6 and Section 6.1 of the Bond Allocation Act and the
Guidelines and Procedures promulgated thereunder, the Municipality irrevocably
agrees to, and does hereby, transfer and reallocate all of its 2013 volume cap to
Buffalo Grove to be used for the issuance of tax-exempt private activity bonds
placed through the Pool to finance Eligible Projects as directed by the Advisory
Committee created pursuant to Buffalo Grove Resolution No. 2001-51.
73
Section 2: This Resolution shall constitute the agreement of the Municipality to a different
allocation under Section 146(e)(3) of the Code and the writing required under
Section 6 of the Bond Allocation Act.
Section 3: The Municipality covenants and warrants that it has taken no action or issued
bonds that would abrogate, diminish, or impair its ability to fulfill the written
agreement, covenants, and undertakings on its part under this Resolution.
Section 4: As required by the Bond Allocation Act and the Guidelines and Procedures
promulgated thereunder, a certified copy of this Resolution shall be transmitted to
the Office of the Governor of the State of Illinois. Any and all appropriate and
proper officers, officials, agents, and employees of the Municipality are hereby
authorized, empowered, and directed to take all necessary and advisable
actions, and to execute all such documents and certificates, as may be
necessary to further the purposes and intent of this Resolution.
Section 5: The Municipality shall maintain a written record of this Resolution in its records
for so long as the bonds to which the volume cap transferred by this Resolution is
reallocated remain outstanding.
Section 6: This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
approval as required by law and is enacted by the Municipality pursuant to its
powers under the laws of the State of Illinois and the Illinois Constitution of 1970
and its home rule powers.
PASSED this _____ day of __________________, 2013.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
APPROVED this _____ day of _______________, 2013.
____________________________________
(Authorized Official)
ATTEST:
__________________________
(Authorized Official)
74
IMS Infrastructure Management Services LakeForest2013Update Plus Parking Lots.docx Page 1 of 8
IMS Infrastructure Management Services
1895-D Rohlwing Road, Rolling Meadows, IL 60008
Phone: (847) 506-1500 Fax: (847) 255-2938
www.ims-rst.com
April 5, 2013
City of Lake Forest
800 North Field Drive
Lake Forest, IL 60045
Attention: Brian Joyce, Engineering Assistant
Reference: 2013 Pavement Management Update and Parking Lot Survey
Dear Mr. Joyce:
IMS Infrastructure Management Services is pleased to submit our proposal to update the City’s pavement
management program. The project will include testing the City’s entire street system and city designated
parking lots. Network level testing using block-to-block referencing will be performed on approximately 140
test miles of pavement designated by the City. The field investigation will include a Laser RST surface
condition survey, Dynaflect-based deflection testing, GPS referencing and a review of environmental and
external factors. Digital images will be provided at 25’ intervals. IMS will install the current version of the
PavePRO Manager software with the updated field data. The pavement management software will be
linked to the City’s GIS and City staff will be trained in software operation and data interpretation.
The parking areas will be evaluated using a manual surface condition survey and can include deflection
analysis as an option. Surveys will be performed at times when the lots have the least number of vehicles.
Reports will be generated to include pavement conditions and recommendations for maintenance and
rehabilitation activities.
IMS can also conduct an optional ROW asset survey to inventory and assess multiple ROW assets such as
pavement markings or a sign inventory. The sign inventory can include a retroreflectivity survey to meet the
MUTCD requirements. IMS can retain the GPS referenced digital video so that the City can have the
option of extracting ROW assets in the future without incurring the additional expense of re-driving the
streets.
The proposed update will ensure that the City’s pavement management program is complete and accurately
reflects current conditions. It will also provide information on the benefits of the rehabilitation strategies
used by the City. This street information along with optional ROW data collected by IMS and/or City staff
can be used to meet many of the reporting requirements of the GASB 34 “modified approach”.
A description of the elements of the proposed update program with corresponding cost summary is set forth
on the following pages. Pricing is from the official schedule submitted by IMS to the Northeast Illinois
Partnering Contract (a consortium of North and Northwest Chicago municipalities).
We look forward to our continued work with the City of Lake Forest. If you have any questions regarding
this proposal or new IMS services, please feel free to contact our office. We are available to make a
presentation of our pavement or ROW asset services to you and/or other City departments upon request.
Very truly yours,
IMS INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Donald L. Hardt
Manager of Client Services
75
IMS Infrastructure Management Services LakeForest2013Update Plus Parking Lots.docx Page 2 of 8
PAVEMENT UPDATE & ASSET MANAGEMENT PROJECT APPROACH
1. Surface Condition Survey
Surveys are completed using the Road Surface Tester (RST). The City will receive a continuous, objective,
and accurate survey of the surface condition of the street network. Retests will be performed using previous
sectioning wherever possible. These network-level surveys with intersection-to-intersection test sections will
be linked to the City’s GIS. The RST provides a great deal of flexibility and can easily adjust test section
lengths to meet previously established test sections and/or any revised City goals. Single-direction testing
will be performed on the two-lane streets. Two-direction testing will be used on divided streets and arterials
and collectors with four or more lanes of
traffic. The surface condition survey is
conducted continuously over the entire
length of the test section and is not
based on sample sections. The
information gathered in this survey
includes inventory, roughness, rut
depth, cracking, texture and distress.
The effects of environmental conditions
will be considered in conjunction with
the surface condition survey.
To provide the City with a ROW asset
data collection option, IMS will collect continuous digital video during the surface condition survey. The RST
combines an inertial navigation guidance system with GPS to geo-locate visible pavement and ROW
features. The simultaneous pavement and ROW asset data collection capability of the RST is unique in the
industry. It provides an efficient and cost-effective means to populate both pavement and asset
management systems.
The presence of any failed or broken concrete slabs within a test section will be recorded for further detailed
identification during the deflection survey. The number of failed slabs will be recorded during the deflection
survey and used by PavePRO Manager software to give the City an option to address individual slab
removal and replacement as a maintenance/rehabilitation strategy for concrete pavements.
2. Deflection Testing
Each street test section surveyed by the Laser RST will receive a deflection test. This testing will be
performed using the Dynaflect device and the results of this testing will permit an analysis of the structural
capabilities of the existing street section. IMS
utilizes all five sensors of the Dynaflect in its
structural analysis. This provides valuable
information on the capabilities of the pavement, base
and subgrade sections, and the interaction between
these sections. Deflection testing was performed on
previous surveys for the City and will provide a solid
basis for comparison to previous results. Although
most Chicago area agencies include structural
analysis as part of their program, the PavePRO
software can be used with or without deflection data.
76
IMS Infrastructure Management Services LakeForest2013Update Plus Parking Lots.docx Page 3 of 8
3. GIS and Pavement Management
IMS will provide a link between the City’s GIS program and the pavement management data to enable the
City to display and generate color-coded maps
based upon existing pavement conditions, street
rehabilitation plans or most any of the data in the
pavement management program. The City can
use the query function of its mapping program to
display the pavement management data. It may
also be possible to use its mapping program to
make queries of other infrastructure plans in
conjunction with their street rehabilitation plans to
determine if conflicts exist between plans. The
future addition of ROW assets would also be
linked to the GIS and entered in the asset
management software. To most effectively
maintain this link, IMS will require a copy of the
City’s current electronic centerline map prior to
field data collection activities.
4. Digital Images
In conjunction with the surface condition survey, each test section is recorded on GPS referenced digital
videotape with forward and rearward directed video cameras and used as part of IMS’ Quality Control and
Quality Assurance procedures. Additional cameras can be used to expand the viewing area or include
features of special interest to the City. IMS will provide digital images with one view at 25’ intervals for
viewing in PavePRO Manager and/or through the City’s GIS. Many agencies find these images valuable as
a “point-in-time” record of their roads and as a source of information for a variety of engineering,
legal/investigative, and administrative uses. They can also be beneficial in assessing damage from a
natural disaster or unforeseen event.
The PavePRO Manager software includes an image module. This enhancement allows for the attachment
of digital images to each test section. The City can then access all the pavement management data from a
selected block and view multiple digital
images for the identified section on his/her
computer monitor. The digital images will be
captured directly from the continuous video
performed as part of the RST survey, but can
be expanded to include images generated
from a City-owned digital camera, and/or
result from scanned photos or drawings.
IMS uses an automated image capture
process that is cost effective and provides for
a user-defined frequency for the number of
pictures per section.
77
IMS Infrastructure Management Services LakeForest2013Update Plus Parking Lots.docx Page 4 of 8
5. Parking Lot Survey
City selected parking lots will be evaluated using a modified surface condition survey and revised analysis
technique. The project can be performed with or without deflection testing. Surveys including deflection
are stationed in a more formal format and provide data similar to the street survey. Surface only
programs are analyzed through IMS-based SurfPRO software and use more flexible stationing criteria.
The reports are similar and provide information related to existing conditions and recommendations for
future maintenance and rehabilitation planning scheduling of field surveys will be adjusted to hours of use
and percentage of open spaces.
6. Pavement Management Software Implementation and Training
IMS will provide the current version of PavePRO Manager software fully loaded with IMS collected field
data. Any City condition data and maintenance histories can be added following staff training. The
software will be installed on the City’s computer network. Since the software is provided with a site
license, it can be used on laptops, field
computers or by other departments at no
additional charge. The software provides
information on existing conditions, future
performance, viable maintenance and
rehabilitation strategies, optimization, schedules,
budgets and multiyear programs. The program
is kept current by City staff through input of
rehabilitation activities.
IMS will provide training for City staff in the
operation and interpretation of these programs.
Update training is usually completed as two half
day on-site sessions and can include actual
operators, managers, and field staff.
7. Right-of-Way Asset Management System (Optional)
Although the pavement management software provides for pavement inventory, IMS can provide
ROW asset inventory and management software for the acquisition of additional pavement and ROW
features. Signs and supports, traffic signals, street lights, pavement striping, pavement markings,
sidewalks, ADA ramps, curbs and gutters, inlets, manholes, trees, driveway aprons, medians, fences,
pavement and ROW hardware can be provided to a level of detail determined by the City. Data collection
for the ROW asset inventory can be performed
simultaneously with the surface condition survey using
IMS’s RST or through a variety of techniques using City
and/or IMS staff.
Digital video extraction to collect asset information is the
most cost effective approach to develop and map
comprehensive asset inventories. The asset survey can
be performed as part of the initial pavement
management program or deferred to a future program or
budget period. The digital video can also be stored by
IMS to allow for future extraction activities without
having to re-drive the street network.
78
IMS Infrastructure Management Services LakeForest2013Update Plus Parking Lots.docx Page 5 of 8
Right of Way Asset Database/Software
Inventory Attributes &
Condition Images
Network Inventory DistanceInertial Nav
GPS Coordinates
Inventory, GPS & distance
are integrated with the images
to form intelligent AVI Files
The field information is
processed using Analyst to
identify, assess and geolocate
all assets following the Master
Asset List protocols. Images
may also be extracted.
The Analyst output data is
formatted, QA’d and then
loaded into the final
application
Prior to the start of any ROW asset survey, a Master Asset List is created to define the information that the
City wants to know about each selected
asset. It is the equivalent to a “data
dictionary” and sets the rules for the asset
extraction process.
The actual ROW asset survey uses the GPS
referenced digital video from a minimum of 3
cameras on-board the RST. The images
and GPS data are merged on a frame-by-
frame basis with the street inventory. They
are post processed using specialty Trident
3D Analyst software to record the location,
attribute information, condition and picture of
each requested asset. Extracted asset data
is loaded into the selected asset
management software and/or the City’s GIS.
8. Optional Retroreflectivity
IMS can perform retroreflectivity surveys using two methodologies. A subjective survey can be performed
using one of three methodologies accepted by the MUTCD. The subjective method is an automated night-
time survey and is generally less costly than the measured approach. This methodology requires that each
street be driven in both directions. The measured approach uses a retroreflectometer to measure the
reflectivity as part of a manual or “feet on the ground” survey. This methodology can be used to measure
the retroreflectivity of power failure folding stop signs at
intersections with traffic signals. Both approaches are
usually performed as a phase II activity. Phase I is the sign
inventory, that includes sign location, attributes and general
condition using asset extraction techniques described above.
It should be noted that although “subjective” may sound less
accurate or not as good as “measured”, it actually is an
excellent approach and meets the MUTCD requirements.
The goal is to determine whether our aging population can
see a particular sign at night as well as they can during the
daylight conditions.
9. Project Timing
The data collection phase of the proposed update program including the RST survey and deflection testing
will be completed within a four week period. Data processing, GIS linkage, and digital images will
immediately follow the fieldwork. The current version of PavePRO Manager software with updated test
results will be delivered within 60 days of completion of the field testing. Software training and the
presentations will be scheduled following data processing completion. Optional ROW asset extraction can
also follow the data processing and image preparation. Optional retroreflectivity testing can be performed
following the development of the sign inventory. The ROW asset deliverables require approximately 90
additional days. The data collection would be done in conjunction with other Chicago Metro area agencies.
79
IMS Infrastructure Management Services LakeForest2013Update Plus Parking Lots.docx Page 6 of 8
FEE SCHEDULE
The cost summary is based on the following fee schedule. It is derived from the official schedule submitted
by IMS to the Northeast Illinois Partnering Contract (a consortium for North and Northwest Chicago area
municipalities). It is based on scheduling surveys in conjunction with other area projects to eliminate
mobilization charges.
Project Initiation $1,500.00
Network Referencing $1,000.00
RST Surface Condition Survey $130.00/ test mile
Deflection Testing $120.00/ test mile
Data Processing $20.00/ test mile
Development of Structural Indices (3rd Party Software) $15.00/ test mile
PCC Slab Survey (for streets with no deflection testing) $20.00/ test mile
Pavement Width Measurements (for streets with no deflection testing) $10.00/ test mile
PavePRO Manager Software $3,000.00
3rd Party Software Special Quote
Data Configuration & Data Load (3rd Party Software) Special Quote
Parking Lot Survey, Software/Report $0.25/sq.yd. - Special Review
Software Training (on site) $1,000.00/day - $600/ half day
Engineering Interpretation, Analysis, Special Reports $125.00/hour
Transfer of Historical Data to a New Program $85.00/hour
PavePRO Software Maintenance and Support $1,000.00/year
GIS Linkage $20.00/ test mile
Digital Images @ 25’ intervals (single view) $13.00/ test mile
Digital Images @ 25’ intervals (additional views) $10.00/mile/view
Digital Video Storage for Future ROW Asset Extraction $10.00/ test mile
GPS/Camera Extraction Set-up & AVI Conversion $10.00/ test mile
ROWMan Software $2,000.00
Master Asset List Development $300.00 - $1,500.00
Project Management 7.5% of Task Activities
Asset Extraction Services (Fee/Asset Pricing)*
Signs and Supports $2.50/sign
Traffic Signals and Supports $2.25/signal and/or support
Light Poles $1.75/pole
Curb and Gutter $1.75/curb block
Storm sewer Inlets $1.75/inlet
Manholes $1.75/manhole
Sidewalks $1.75-$2.25/sidewalk block
ADA Ramps $1.75/ramp
Driveway Aprons (point asset) $1.75/apron
Driveway Aprons (linear asset) $2.25/apron
Railroad Crossings $2.25/crossing
Hydrants $2.25/hydrant
Trees $2.50/tree
Pavement Markings (point assets) $1.75/marking
Pavement Striping (linear assets) $1.75/block
Guard Rails $2.50/guard rail
Medians $2.50/median
Fences $2.50/fence
Ditches $2.25/ditch
Misc. Road and ROW Hardware $2.25/asset
80
IMS Infrastructure Management Services LakeForest2013Update Plus Parking Lots.docx Page 7 of 8
* Unit price per mile estimates for ROW assets are more difficult to develop because of unlimited scenarios
and unknown quantities. Having performed sign surveys for a number of different agencies, we find that the
number of signs ranged from 30 to 109 per mile. Other assets (e.g. sidewalks, light poles, pavement
markings, inlets, trees, etc.) vary dramatically from agency to agency and district to district within the agency
depending on age, terrain, etc. Since there are some advantages to extracting multiple assets during the
extraction activity, IMS has offered a cost per mile alternative in addition to or in lieu of the cost per asset
previously referenced. We believe that this alternative can assist the City in the budget process and
eliminate surprises. If the City has a good estimate of the quantity of some of their assets, the original unit
price per asset offer may be the best approach.
COST SUMMARY
IMS has developed the following pavement management update cost summary for your review.
The estimate is based on the street network of 140 test miles and City selected parking lots (approximately
25,976 sq. yds.). Any new streets added since the last survey and identified on the City’s GIS can be
included in this update.
Activity Quantity Units Unit Rate Total
Project Initiation
Project Initiation 1 LS $1,500.00 $1,500.00
Network Referencing 1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000.00
Field Surveys
RST Surface Condition Survey 140 MI $130.00 $18,200.00
Deflection Testing 140 MI $120.00 $16,800.00
Parking Lot Survey & Report*1 LS $6,494.00 $6,494.00
Data Management
Data Processing 140 MI $20.00 $2,800.00
PavePRO Software Update 1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000.00
PavePRO Software Maintenance and Support 1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000.00
GIS Linkage 140 MI $20.00 $2,800.00
Digital Images (1 view @ 25' intervals)140 MI $13.00 $1,820.00
PavePRO Software Training (2 half days of training) 2 EA $600.00 $1,200.00
Digital Video Storage for Future Asset Extraction 140 MI $10.00 $1,400.00
Project Management 1 LS $3,615.00 $3,615.00
* Multiple parking lots - approximately 25,976 sq. yds. @ $0.25/sq. yd
Pavement Management Update Total $59,629.00
Services are provided on a unit-price basis and the City will be charged only for the actual number of miles
tested and included in the database. The fee schedule is submitted with the assumption that the City will
provide or assist IMS with the following information and services:
Street list and GIS centerline file of roads to be surveyed complete with functional classifications.
Optional asset attributes and condition assessments for the Master Asset List.
Safety vehicle to trail deflection-testing equipment on arterials and collectors, if requested.
Notification and coordination with other departments or agencies, if necessary.
81
IMS Infrastructure Management Services LakeForest2013Update Plus Parking Lots.docx Page 8 of 8
PROJECT APPROVAL - City of Lake Forest
This proposal is submitted in duplicate with each copy being considered as an original. Acceptance is
constituted by signing and returning one copy to our office.
Approved Services (please check off selected services)
Pavement Management Update Program with Parking Lot Survey ($59,629.00)
ACCEPTED:
City of Lake Forest, IL
By: __________________________
Title: __________________________
Date: __________________________
82
I
9
4
FIELD
DR
KENNEDY RD (RT 60)
GAGE LN
WAU
K
EG
A
N
R
D
WALDEN LN
F O S T E R P LL
A
K
E
R
D
GREEN
BA
Y
RD
ILLINOIS RD
O
L
D ELM RD
A R B O R LN
F ARM RD
K
UR
TIS
LNOLD MILL RD
WESTMINSTER ESTATE LNR INGWOOD R D
H
U
N
T
E
R
L
N
W E STMO
RELAND RD
MELO D Y RD
ONWENTSIA RD
LAUREL AVE
KATHRYN LNB
UENA RD
LO N G M E A D O W LN
CARROLL RD
LOCH L
NSAUNDERS RDWINWOOD DR
A C O R N T R
ESTES AVELAKEW O O D D R TURICUMGA
VIN CT
OAK KNOLL DREVERGREEN DRHARLAN LNWILD ROSE LN
SYMP
H
O
NY ST
COUNT
R
Y PL DOUGLAS DRWEST
FORK
D
R
F
A
I
R
V
I
EW
A
V
E
STONE AVESTABLE LNTIMBER LNWESTLEIGH RD
NORTHCROFT CT
BARNSWALLOWFALLS CIR PL
E
D
G
E
F
I
E
L
D
LN
WESTMINSTER
ONWENTSIA CLUB
HI
G
H
L
A
N
D
A
V
E
ARCA DY D RROSEM A RY RD
NORTH AVE
ALDEN LN
F O O TBALL DR
NOBLE AVE
LOUIS AVEBURR OAK RDWESTLEIGH RD
ALEXIS CTWALDEN R
D
WALL
A
CE RD GOLF
LN
W
A
V
E
L
AND
RD
E
LM TREE
R
D
MAYFLOWER RDH A CKBERRY LN
FAIRWAY DR
LOWELL LNOLD COLONY RDAHWAHNEE LNHILLDALE PL
FIORE DRSUMMERFIE L D DR
C A M P U S CIRVALLEY
R
D
CHEROKEE RDLELAND CTWASHI
NGT
O
N
CONWAY RD
REGENCY LN
WED G E W OOD DRB
U
T
L
ER DRPOLO DRLONGWOOD DRCAHILL LNWOODL A ND RD
SCOTT ST
W ILSO N D R
ATTERIDGE RD
R
U
E FORE T
GLENWOOD RD
SPRUCE AV
ASHLEY
PADDOCK LNBRIDLEPARK AVE
LINDEN AVE
B
L
U
FFS EDGE DRSOUTHNO
R
T
H
HAVENWOOD
RD
LNKEITH LNWISCONSINAVELYNETTE DRMAR-LANE DRSUM
MIT
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
A
VRDSPRING LN
WA
SH
IN
GTON CIR
AHWAHNEE RDJAMES CT NA BINGTO N CA M BS DR
SOUTH M EADOW LNC R AB T R EE L N
HONEYSUCKL E RDPEMBRIDGE D
R
MEADOW LNPEMBROKE D R
FRANKLIN
MCCORMICK DRQUAIL D RTARA
LNFRANZ DRW A LNUT RDOAKWOOD AVEBRIAR LN
ASH LAWN WILLOW STAYNSLEY
C
H
U
R
C
H
C O LL E G E R D
S U F FOLK LNLARCHMONT
BARAT CT
M
ALLA R D LNVINE AVE WOODBINE PLHERIT
A
GE CTJENSEN DREDGEWOOD RDCASTLEGATE CTOLMSTEDLANE KI
MMER CTOAKDALE AVEGRIFFITH
RDRYAN PLCOVE N TRY DRCLOVER AVEHAWTHORNE PLGREENWOOD AVE
NORTHMOOR RDROSE
WOODHILL LNPINE OAKS CIR
BRIDGE LN VIEW
SAVANNA
CTRIDGE RDWHITE OAKEXETER
PL
A
S
P
E
N
D
R JUNE TERSANDPIP E R LN
HIGHVIEW TERR
G RANBY
LEXINGTON DRSUNSET
GARDNER LN
TERR
BROADLAND LN
WHITMORE
GREENVIEW PL
B IG O A K SHE R O N R D
MERRITTL A W R E N C E A V E SEQUOIA CTPINE LN
GREEN BRIAR LN
NORTH POND LN
MILLS CT
PRAIRIE AVESHAWNEE LNSUMMIT AVSIR WILLIAM LNRED FOX LNHAWKWEED LNTHOMAS PL
NEGAUNEE LNRIDGEARMOUR
WOODLAWN
BRECKENRIDGE J E N N I F E R C T HOLLAND CTASHLAND FLETCHERHOLDEN CTFARLIN WESTERN
AVEMT VERNON AVESTONELEIGH CT
CASCADE TIVERTONBURTONME
A
D
O
W
L
A
K
E
LN
LNCIRR
DRD
PL
ANNALN
MARKET SQ
MICHGAMME LN
BIRCH CT
CONCORD DR
JACQULYN
LN
VERDA HWY 41
D E E R PATH GREEN BAY RDL
A
K
E
R
D
CIRCLE LN
D E E R P A T H
TELEGRAPH RDWES
T
E
RN
A
V
E
B
E
V
E
R
L
Y
P
L
DEE R PATH MCKI
NLEY RDTI
MBER LNTALLGRA S S LNMCKI
NLEY RDG
R
E
E
N
B
A
Y
R
D
GREEN BAY RDGLENWOOD R DSHERIDAN RD
WESTERN AVES
HERIDAN RDS
H
E
R
I
DAN RDWAUK
EG
A
N
R
D
OLD MILL RDWAUKEGAN RD (RTE 43)MARIO N AVE GRANDVIEW LN WOODED LNWINSTON RDMAYWOOD RDSTONEGATE LNWINTHROPLN GREENLEAF AVERAVINEPARKDR
BROAD SMOO R E
KAJER LN
EAST
MINTHAVEN RDFOX TRAIL CTSTABLEWOOD LNRDBUENAHIGHKNOLLWOODBARCLAYCIRKIRKHILL
LNJAMESSTLN FARNHAMLN
OLD ELM RDSAUNDERS RDRIDGE RDEST AT E LN
RINGWOOD RD
RIDGE
RD
O LD ELM RDHWY 41OAK KNOLL DRBUENA RDW E S T M INSTER CA MPUS
CI
R
CARROLL
RIDGE RD
LAUREL AVE
FOREST HILL RDMELLODY
R OS E M ARY RD
H
W
Y
4
1I 94 SP RU CE A V
M
IL
L
B
U
RNE RDOLD MILL RD
D E ERPATH
M
A
Y
F
L
O
WE
R RDKENNEDY RD (RTE 60)
M O R N IN G S I D E DR
KNOLLWOO D R D
NILES AVE
OVE
RLOOKDR
ST
O
N
EHASTINGS RDDR
M
T
V
E
R
N
O
N
A
V
EWOODSTREAMCT
AVECTWILSHIRE RD
KIMBERLY
WINDHAVEN CTCASCADE CT SOLD BARNLNS A D DLERUNHOLB
ORN KING MUIR RDLN
CONWAY FARMS DRACADEMY RDFORESTELM TREE RDEVER ETT RDI 94 FIELD DRWAUKEGAN RD (RTE 43)J
AMES C T S
TURICUM RDHWY
4
1
EVERETT RD EVERETT RDWA
U
K
E
GA
N
R
D
(
R
T
E
4
3
)
DEERPATH
L
AKE RD H
W
Y
4
1 BANK LNILLIN
O
IS RD
LINDEN AVEILLIN O IS R D
FOREST HILL RDSHERIDAN RDC H EROKEE
R
D
S
H
E
R
I
D
A
N
R
DROCKE
F
E
L
LERRD GATERD
CHERRY AVE
MAPLE WOOD RD
FROSTPL WIL
D
WOODRDWESTMINSTER
WISCONSIN
OAKWOOD AVEW O O D LA NDRDLNCHRISTIN ALNSU
R
R
E
Y
LNDOVER RDSHAWFORD WAY
LARKSPUR CT
CT N RIDGE
RDSUSSEXLNKNOLL
AVEI
L
L
I
NOIS RDBARBE R R Y LNAV
GOLDENROD LNOAKBOWLINGGREENDRWILSON DRLITTLEFIELDDRDRSTRATFORD CT WEDGEWOOD CTLN
CTDEVONSHIR
EPARLIAMENT CTWIMBLEDON CT
OLD MILL RD
SALISBURY LN TANGLEWOODCTSETTLERS' SQUARE
S
H
E
F
F
I
E
L
D
C
TBARRY'S CTYOR
KTOW
N
E
LN
CAST
L
EDRNEW
REILLY LNPINE CROFT
LNWAUKEGAN RD ( RTE 43)KNIGHTSBRIDGECTCONWAY F
A
R
M
SDR
RI
D
G
E
R
D
R
D
WESTLEIGH RD
BASSWOOD RDBLACKTH ORNLNPO P L A R RDLNW
A
RWICKRDRDKENNINGTON TERR
CHILTERN DREDGCOT
E LN
TIS B U R Y
RD
1
LN
PARKMEADLN
INVERLIETH RD HATHAWAYCIRMEADOWOODDRMONTICELLOCIRDR
GREENVALERDHALLIGANCIRDRNORTHCLIFFWAY KING
MU
IR
TERRINVERLIETH
DEERPATHSQMIDDLEFORK DR DRCTMCGLINNINCTKENNICOTT DR EMMONSCTA
V
EWOODROCKLAND RD (RTE 176)
W OO D B IN E
LN
LNV
ALL
EY RDBU
E
N
A
R
DKNOLLWOOD R DCIRCT
2 34 5
6
7
8
1 MARQUETTE CT2 PRINCETON CT3 HARVARD CT4 STANFORD CT5 CORNELL CT6 ACADEMY WOODS DR7 ACADEMY RD8 YALE CT
1
2
3
4
56
7 8 9101112
13
SOU
T
H
S
H
O
R
E
LN
1 BERKSHIRE DR2 WOODWARD CT3 ANDOVER CT4 STOCKBRIDGE CT5 GREENWAY DR6 WHARTON DR7 BUCKINGHAM CT8 ST GEORGE CT9 BALMORAL CT10 WINDSOR CT11 BRISTOL CT12 EATON CT13 CAMELOT CT
LAKE FOREST HOSPITALWEST CAMPUSLAKE COUNTY FOREST PRESERVEDEERPATH GOLF COURSEKNOLLWOOD CLUBLAKE COUNTY FOREST PRESERVEELAWALAKE FOREST COLLEGELAKE FOREST NATURE PRESERVERECYCLING CENTERFOREST PARK BEACHGROVE SCHOOLBARAT COLLEGENORTHCROFT PARKWAVELAND PARKLAKE FOREST CEMETERYWEST PARKST MARY'S SCHOOLDEERPATH COMMUNITY PARKRECREATION CENTERPUBLIC SAFFETYCHEROKEE SCHOOLLAKE FOREST WATER PLANTGORTON COMMITY CENTER
FIELD CT
PL
RDAVE
EVERETT SCHOOLRD
GR
O
V
E
CT
TRILLIUMLN
KENNETTLNRANCHRD HARLANCTCRESTCT KENDLERCTIVYCT MAPLECTHEATHER
LN THORNE LNOXFORDRD
LORRAINE
CIR
LN
RD
14 ASBURY CT15 CANTERBURY CT16 NEWPORT CT17 DANBURY CT18 BRADFORD CT19 OLD BRIDGE RD
14 15
19161718
WINDRIDGE
OAK GROVE LN
KNOLLDRCT
LN
O'LEARY LN
GLOUC E S T E R CRKESWICK LN
AM BERL EY CT1
2
3
1 MAGNOLIA LN2 WESTBRIDGE CIR3 ELDERBERRY CT
CEDAR LN RO B IN SON D R
CHALMERS
CT2013 Asphalt Paving
Pavement Resurfacing
YEAR, FISCAL YEAR
2013, 2014
µ
April 05, 2013
MTF- Final 83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
1
Walker, Shelley
From:Boyer, Margaret
Sent:Wednesday, March 20, 2013 3:37 PM
To:Walters, Carina
Subject:FW: Alcohol at gas stations
From: Kiely, Robert
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 3:18 PM
Subject: Fwd: Alcohol at gas stations
Fyi, per Cathy's request. We will include in the agenda packet write‐up for the April 1 meeting.
Bob Kiely
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Held, Jim" <HeldJ@cityoflakeforest.com>
Date: March 20, 2013, 8:29:52 AM CDT
To: "Schoenheider, Don" <SchoenheiderD@cityoflakeforest.com>
Cc: "Waldeck, Cathy" <WaldeckC@cityoflakeforest.com>, "Walters, Carina"
<waltersc@cityoflakeforest.com>, "Czerniak, Cathy" <CzerniaC@cityoflakeforest.com>, "Kiely, Robert"
<KielyR@cityoflakeforest.com>
Subject: Alcohol at gas stations
Mayor Schoenheider,
I did a quick survey of area chiefs regarding alcohol sales at gas stations.
Highland Park No
Riverwoods No
Kennilworth..retail sales of alcohol prohibited, but may be getting changed
Bannockburn No
Lake Bluff No
Highwood Yes
Deerfield No
Skokie No
Glencoe No
Winnetka No
I also copied Alderman Waldeck as this was brought up by her on Monday.
Should I receive more results I will put add them.
James E. Held
Chief of Police
City of Lake Forest
847‐810‐3802
119
2
heldj@cityoflakeforest.com
120
THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST
RESOLUTION NO. ____________
A RESOLUTION REGARDING ZONING AMENDMENTS FOR
USE OF PROPERTY FOR ACCESS TO UNINCORPORATED LOTS
WHEREAS, The City of Lake Forest (the “City”) is a home rule special charter
municipality established and existing in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois
of 1970; and
WHEREAS, the City has a long tradition of utilizing its zoning and planning authority to
ensure that compatible uses are maintained in its various neighborhoods; and
WHEREAS, the City contains numerous properties within its corporate limits that are
adjacent to lots located outside of Lake Forest (the "Outside Properties"); and
WHEREAS, the City has no jurisdiction or control over any Outside Properties; and
WHEREAS, because uses of Outside Properties can impact the City in unanticipated
and undesirable ways, and may also impose additional demands on City facilities and services,
the City desires to regulate the use of properties within Lake Forest from being used to provide
access to Outside Properties; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City and
its residents to direct the Plan Commission of The City of Lake Forest (the "Plan Commission")
to evaluate and propose regulations to control the use of properties within Lake Forest as
means of access to Outside Properties (including an assessment of the use of the Outside
Properties) to determine their impacts on the City and its residents;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, COUNTY OF LAKE, STATE OF ILLINOIS, as follows:
SECTION ONE: RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are incorporated in, and made a
part of, this Resolution by this reference as findings of the City Council of The City of Lake
Forest.
121
2
SECTION TWO: DIRECTION TO PLAN COMMISSION; NOTICE TO PUBLIC. The
Director of Community Development is directed to publish appropriate notices, and the Plan
Commission is hereby directed to hold a public hearing, regarding proposed regulations and
procedures with respect to the use of properties within the City as a means of access to Outside
Properties. The public shall be deemed to have notice that the City is considering a Zoning
Code amendment regarding use of properties within the City as a means of access to Outside
Properties as of the effective date of this Resolution.
SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect
upon the passage and approval.
PASSED THIS ___ DAY OF APRIL, 2013.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
APPROVED THIS ___ DAY OF APRIL, 2013.
_______________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________
City Clerk
122
WINTER OPERATIONS MONTHLY REPORT
MARCH EVENT SUMMARY
Plowing – 2 Events
Salting – 5 Events
Snow Hauling – 3 Events
Sidewalk Plowing – 1 Event (over 4 days)
Snow Accumulation – 7”
WINTER OPERATIONS SUMMARY REPORT THRU MARCH 2013
LABOR SUMMARY
FY2013 Salary Budget: $136,211
OT Hours OT Cost Balance
November 2012 0.00 $0.00 $136,211.00
December 2012 359.00 $15,295.06 $120,915.94
January 2013 348.25 $13,994.59 $106,921.35
February 2013 1,729.00 $72,501.86 $34,419.49
March 2013 613.25 $26,371.32 $8,048.17
YTD Total: 3,049.50 $128,162.83 $8,048.17
SALT SUMMARY
(in tons)
Starting
Tonnage
Delivered Total
Used
Balance
Available
November 2012 2,400.00 0.00 0.00 2,400.00
December 2012 2,400.00 0.00 (231.00) 2,169.00
January 2013 2,169.00 0.00 (490.00) 1,679.00
February 2013 1,679.00 650.00 (1,295.00) 1,034.00
March 2013 1,034.00 550.00 (518.00) 1,066.00
YTD Total: 1,200.00 (2,534.00) 1,066.00
MARCH 2013
S M T W T F S
1
2 3
4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30
123